FT : Tesla’s biggest independent investor cuts stake in electric carmaker

Tesla’s biggest independent investor cuts stake in electric carmaker
Edinburgh-based Baillie Gifford reaps estimated $17bn profit after surge in valuation

Tesla’s biggest independent shareholder has cut its investment in the electric carmaker, generating profits of about $17bn in just eight months after a six-fold surge in the company’s valuation.

Scottish fund manager Baillie Gifford said on Wednesday it had reduced its stake in Elon Musk’s company to less than 5 per cent in August to comply with guidelines limiting the weight of a single stock in clients’ portfolios.

The Edinburgh-based group, with £262bn in assets under management and more than 200 of its clients owning positions in Tesla, now holds $19.7bn of the company’s stock, or 4.25 per cent.

“We remain very optimistic about the future of Tesla. We intend to remain significant shareholders for many years,” said James Anderson, co-manager of Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, Baillie Gifford’s flagship fund. 

The Scottish investment manager has sold just under half of its Tesla shares so far this year, reducing its holding from 7.7 per cent at the end of December, which was then worth just $5.8bn. It was the second-biggest shareholder after Mr Musk at the time.

Tesla’s share price has rallied nearly 500 per cent this year. It was trading at $422.56 on Wednesday after a 5-for-1 stock split in August that was designed to make the shares more affordable for retail investors. 

Baillie Gifford started investing in Tesla in January 2013 when the share price, adjusted for the stock split, was less than $7. Clients of Baillie Gifford are sitting on profits from investing in Tesla conservatively estimated at between $17bn and $20bn. 

The Palo Alto-based group intends to raise an additional $5bn by selling shares to invest in its “cybertruck” pick-up model and to fund its international expansion including plans for a European manufacturing and battery centre in Germany. 

Mr Anderson said Tesla no longer faced difficulty raising large amounts of fresh capital from outside sources, but Baillie Gifford would consider increasing its investment again if there was any serious setback in the share price. 

“Tesla is driving forward a transportation and energy revolution in the face of persistent scepticism and often downright hostility. The possibility of averting climate disaster would be significantly reduced without Tesla’s efforts,” said Mr Anderson.

Tesla’s stock trades at more than 300 times the group’s expected earnings this year but Mr Anderson dismissed concerns about the expensive valuations attached to many tech stocks.

He believes investors have to be ready to pay “unreasonable prices” for high-growth stocks because the scale of future returns can be dramatic, an approach that has influenced other portfolio managers.

Bold bets on US tech stocks, Chinese equities and innovative private companies have transformed Baillie Gifford in less than 20 years from a little-known Edinburgh-based investment boutique into the UK’s fastest-growing asset manager.

It has retained its early structure as an unlimited liability private partnership, an arrangement which is unique among modern fund management companies.

FT : My mission to prove second-hand can be luxurious

My mission to prove second-hand can be luxurious
Why stylist Bay Garnett is bringing Oxfam to London’s Selfridges

Bay Garnett is on a mission to make thrift stores as luxurious as any boutique on Bond Street. This month, the fashion editor and Vogue contributor has worked with Oxfam and Selfridges to create a pop-up shop to sit alongside some of the biggest names in luxury. It’s part of a broader Project Earth initiative by the department store, aimed at challenging consumers and brands to think and act more sustainably.

“I liked the concept of shifting thrift and second-hand clothes into a different context,” says Garnett. “I just wanted to play with the idea of doing a really good edit, and then putting those items next to Gucci or Celine or Prada, in a store that has all the bells and whistles of a luxury space.”

Opening on 7 September, the store will be located on the second floor of Selfridges, selling clothes, bags and selected homewares that Garnett has sourced from Oxfam’s shops and warehouses. Those pieces include a “really brilliant jumpsuit by Jean Paul Gaultier, like a superhero outfit”, as well as heritage jackets and maximalist dresses, à la Alessandro Michele’s Gucci.

Crucially, all the pricing has been done by Oxfam, so you won’t see the big mark-ups that often come with second-hand clothes. Money from the sales will go straight back to the charity.

Garnett has long campaigned for buying second-hand clothes. In the 1990s, she edited Cheap Date, a London-based, anti-establishment fashion magazine dedicated to thrift shopping. Within its pages, she made fake campaigns that changed the names of luxury brands to second-hand buzz words: “Yves Saint Laurent became Salvation Army, Christian Dior became Charity Donor, and Burberry became Borrowed.”

She started working with Oxfam four years ago, first on a fashion show called Fashion Fighting Poverty, which kicked off London Fashion Week in 2017, and then for Second Hand September, an initiative challenging consumers to refrain from buying new clothes for a month. The face of the first campaign was supermodel Stella Tennant – this year, the charity has enlisted I May Destroy You star Michaela Coel to front the cause.

“Now so more than ever, because of sustainability and all the stuff that’s just become urgent, I feel really quite passionate about it,” adds Garnett. “Second-hand clothes are, really, the only sustainable way to buy clothes. And I know that’s not realistic – and I don’t just buy second-hand clothes, but I think there has to be more of it. In a way, this is a nice pointer to that.”

WSJ : Tesla’s Share-Sale Plans Boost Bonds

Tesla’s Share-Sale Plans Boost Bonds
Prices for the company’s traditional bond due in 2025 reached a record 104.36 cents on the dollar Tuesday

Prices for Tesla Inc.’s TSLA -4.67% traditional bond due in 2025 reached a record 104.36 cents on the dollar Tuesday, according to MarketAxess, after the electric-car maker said it would sell up to $5 billion in stock, bolstering its balance sheet after a 5-for-1 stock split Monday.

That marks a rebound from lows around 79 cents during the worst of the pandemic’s market turmoil and the latest big swing in the company’s bond prices. Since snapping up the company’s first conventional bond offering in 2017, investors have questioned where Tesla would get the money to repay debt as it burned cash and struggled to turn a profit. In 2018, the bonds were near 85 cents on the dollar following a ratings downgrade and stock price declines.

For many, Tesla’s surging market value has now answered that question. Shares have soared since the March lows, fueled by investors’ bets that the company and its technology are poised to change the world. Tesla shares have climbed more than 7% this week alone, powering the company to a market capitalization of around $442 billion—bigger than Fiat Chrysler Automobiles FCAU -1.27% NV, Ford Motor Co. F 0.15% and General Motors Co. GM 0.54% combined.

While stock investors’ enthusiasm for the company’s prospects has helped send shares through the roof, bondholders remain more circumspect about the company’s prospects. In part, that is because Tesla has often spent more cash than it generates. Its high valuation means it can easily raise money, but skeptics say Tesla will have to become a consistent cash generator to make its bonds trade consistently at higher levels.

Tesla in July reported a fourth-consecutive profitable quarter for the first time in company history and is on pace to sell around 430,000 vehicles in 2020, according to estimates by research firm CreditSights, far fewer than its U.S. competitors. The company had about $8.5 billion in debt, excluding vehicle and energy-product financing, at the end of last quarter.

Tesla has added more than $366 billion in market value this year, despite posting just $120 million in net income during the first two quarters, supported by selling regulatory credits and improving profitability in China. Shares fell 4.7% Tuesday after the company disclosed its stock-selling plans.

“It’s been a roller-coaster ride for bond investors,” said Hitin Anand, industrials analyst at CreditSights. “Right now, the good news is Tesla has a lot of options at the table.”

Those options make the company’s debt more appealing to some, because it gives the company more ways to raise money to repay bondholders. While Tesla’s growth and potential to reshape the automobile industry have helped power stock gains, debt investors tend to worry more about companies producing stable cash flow that can be used to make interest payments.

“We did not find the [company’s bonds] attractive when they were issued, but we do now because of Tesla’s access to very low cost capital,” said Bill Zox, chief investment officer at Diamond Hill Capital Management.

Chief Executive Elon Musk, the company’s largest shareholder, has had a complicated relationship with fundraising, expressing reluctance toward issuing stock over concerns that it would dilute existing shareholders. The company raised $2 billion through a secondary stock offering in February and sold more than $2 billion of stock and convertible bonds—a hybrid of debt and equity—in May 2019.

Tesla didn’t respond to requests for comment.

A $5 billion stock sale could dilute Tesla shareholders by 2% to 3%, said Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities Inc. But the benefits may outweigh any dilution, he added, since that money will get the company out of debt from a cash perspective, as well as help support the build out of its Gigafactory plants in the U.S. and Europe.

Tesla had around $8.6 billion of cash and equivalents as of June 30, according to company filings.

Prices for Tesla’s convertible bonds have skyrocketed to more than 658 cents on the dollar. That leaves the company with another option to help bring down debt, if needed, since Tesla could induce holders to convert into stock without much added compensation, said Eli Pars, co-chief investment officer at Calamos Investments.

“It all depends on what [Tesla] thinks is its timeline for spending money,” said Mr. Pars.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
:

  • GSX -16.2% (also discloses SEC investigation) HOME -14.7%, SCVL -12.2%, JAMF -9.2%, ALVR -3.8%, HRB -2.3%

Other news:

  • HLNE -4.2% (stock offering)
  • IMVT -3% (prices 5,270,093 shares of its common stock at $33.00/share)
  • BLDP -2.7% (establishes new cross-border $250 mln ATM Equity Program)
  • ICLK -2.6% (commences follow-on offering of up to 7,922,787 American depositary shares)
  • AIR -2.2% (signs new services agreement with Frontier Airlines)
  • HL -1.8% (increases dividend)
  • GOGO -1.8% (S&P CreditWatch revised to positive from negative)
  • NKLA -1.6% (WOR says in August its WI Ventures unit sold 6.5 mln shares of Nikola)

Analyst comments:

  • DAO -2% (downgraded to Neutral from Outperform at Credit Suisse)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up 

In reaction to strong earnings/guidance:

  • GES +7.4%, LE +5.3%, M +5.3%, CAL +2.9%, BF.A +2%, CDMO +0.7%

Other news:

  • AMC +17.8% (expects to reopen at approx 140 additional theatres this week)
  • OSH +12.5% (announces collaboration with WMT to offer clinics at Dallas area locations)
  • VHC +7.8% (confirms motion for relief from judgment brought by Apple (AAPL))
  • FEAC +6.2% (agree to a business combination that will result in Skillz becoming a publicly-listed company)
  • LI +5.1% (reports July and August deliveries)
  • CLNE +4% (has been contracted by New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority to provide its Redeem renewable natural gas to power the MTA's 800 natural gas transit buses)
  • SERV +3.9% (to sell its ServiceMaster Brands businesses to an affiliate of Roark Capital, for $1.553 billion, affirms Q3 guidance)
  • MESO +3.1% (receives ethics approval to include Australian hospitals in the Phase 3 randomized controlled trial of remestemcel-L in ventilator-dependent COVID-19 patients)
  • TGI +2.2% (extends partnership with Airbus)
  • RPM +1.4% (to acquire abrasives manufacturer Ali Industries)
  • RMAX +1.4% (acquires wemlo, a mortgage processing start-up)
  • PRIM +1.4% (files mixed securities shelf offering)
  • GM +1% (to meet with Ivanka Trump on Wed, according to CNBC)

Analyst comments:

  • NVDA +4.7% (target raised to a Street-high $650 from $600 at BofA Securities)
  • Z +4.1% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Deutsche Bank)
  • NLS +2.5% (initiated with an Outperform at William Blair)
  • LUV +1.8% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Berenberg)
  • EQH +1.4% (upgraded to Outperform from Sector Perform at RBC Capital Mkts)
  • TDOC +1% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Berenberg)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • OSH +13%, FEAC +12.3%, VHC +8.9%, AMC +7.6%, LI +6.1%, CAL +5.6%, MESO +2.9%, DOV +2.3%, TGI +2.2%, CLNE +2.2%, RPM +1.4%, RMAX +1.4%, GM +1.3%, CDMO +1.3%, AMGN +0.9%, V +0.6%
  • Gapping down:
    • GSX -16.5%, HOME -13.3%, SCVL -13.1%, JAMF -7.5%, AMRN -4.5%, HLNE -4%, ICLK -2.6%, AIR -2.2%, NKLA -1.8%, GOGO -1.6%, BLDP -0.6%, TBPH -0.5%

FT : Technology has abetted China’s surveillance state

Technology has abetted China’s surveillance state
Beijing’s plan for a digital currency presents yet another opportunity for citizens to be monitored

In the spring, the Chinese Communist party took an important step toward realising President Xi Jinping’s vision of a “China Dream”. In April, the People’s Bank of China announced the establishment of a central bank digital currency that is now being tested in four cities as a prelude to converting the entire economy from cash to digital currency. This is the latest in a long series of initiatives launched to fortify China’s one-party state with innovative new technologies.

The PBoC boasts that the digital currency will “combat money laundering, gambling and terror financing” and improve “the efficiency of transactions in its financial system”. It will certainly advance China beyond the efficient digital payment apps such as WeChat Pay and Alipay that are already widely used. However, fully digitising the currency could give the Communist party unprecedented new levels of control over China’s 1.4bn citizens by allowing it to track their financial transactions. The ability to use cash and to buy gold and US dollars — which cannot be bought with the new digital currency — afford some of the last areas where Chinese have had a modicum of unmonitored freedom.

Many in the west had hoped that technology would prove a liberating force in China. Former US president Bill Clinton once compared the Communist party’s efforts to control the internet to “nailing Jell-O to the wall”. But the party has nonetheless achieved internet sovereignty by establishing fibre-optic gateways into China where incoming data can be “packet sniffed” and censored by 60-odd state agencies dedicated to monitoring and controlling online activity, and by shutting out foreign IT companies. The result is a mutant intranet that is both connected to, but detached from, the world wide web.

Mr Xi’s elevation to party general secretary in 2012 was a turning point. Three years later the state rolled out its “sharp eyes” initiative, blanketing public spaces with networks of CCTV with tens of millions of cameras, most made by Chinese companies such as Hikvision. The goal, the national development and reform commission said then, was to create an “omnipresent, fully integrated, always working and fully controllable” nationwide surveillance system. This system has become enhanced with geolocation data from smartphones and vehicles, facial recognition capabilities and AI interfaces giving Mr Xi’s regime the ability to monitor the daily movements and behaviour of a growing proportion of its subjects.

Then there’s the party’s vaunted “social credit system”, which aggregates police records, political files, financial data, medical records, travel movements, online activity and other information held on individuals to create “trustworthiness scores” designed to rank each citizen’s dependability. A low score might prevent someone from buying a plane ticket or attending university. These digital control techniques were road tested in Xinjiang, the north-western region with a large Muslim Uighur population, which the Brookings Institution has called “arguably the world’s largest open-air digital prison”.

The Covid-19 pandemic has given President Xi an opportunity to tighten things even further. The mandatory installation of phone apps such as the Alipay Health Code, which rates and colour codes someone’s risk of being infectious, allowed the state to track its people 24/7 through geolocation, highway cameras and payments.

Beijing was ultimately successful in bringing the virus under control, but the crisis allowed Mr Xi to expand the state’s ability to track where individuals go online and in real life, weaving a tighter web of controls that comport with his new form of intrusive neo-Maoist totalitarianism that brooks no challenges.

China’s new networked surveillance and control systems are designed not just for domestic use, but also for export to 63 countries. Companies including Huawei, Hikvision and ZTE are securing new sources of revenue and data, as well as strategic leverage. The ties help Beijing counter, even silence, outside criticism of its autocratic and aggressive practices, such as Hong Kong’s new national security law.

Step by step, Mr Xi and the party are turning China into the world’s most ambitious, well-funded and tightly organised research laboratory dedicated to exploring how technology can serve rather than undermine autocracy. The pretension and scope of the surveillance brings to mind George Orwell’s dystopian vision. “We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it,” observed one character in Orwell’s 1984. Mr Xi is unlikely to disprove his rule.

WWD : Retail Workers Face Rough Road in Corporate Bankruptcies

Retail Workers Face Rough Road in Corporate Bankruptcies
Store employees face a disproportionate burden of job insecurity and loss of vital benefits, and tend to lack a strong voice in the process.

As bankruptcy courts attempt to ensure companies’ survival, the dynamics of a fast-paced process designed to prioritize secured lenders — which in the case of many large apparel retailers include banks and hedge funds — pose considerable challenges to the interests of rank and file store employees.
Often, store associates, and even store managers, don’t learn of their company’s bankruptcy filing until just before it happens, and even then, how they’ll fare in the proceedings can largely remain unclear. That uncertainty has been heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic that resulted in the furloughs of tens of thousands of apparel retail employees, and kept non-essential stores closed for months.

The dynamic overall has left workers unsure of whether their company will be successfully sold, or reorganized, or simply wind up liquidating, and if they’ll still have a job on the other side, said Michael Duff, professor at the University of Wyoming College of Law, who teaches labor law and bankruptcy.
“In theory, there’s supposed to be equal treatment outside of the domain of secured creditors,” he said. “[But] not enough questions are asked about how the system operates after that because the folks who are harmed, let’s be perfectly clear, don’t have a seat at the table when discussions are being held regarding bankruptcy policy.”

When a court is asked to weigh the competing interests in a retail bankruptcy, it often reminds its supplicants that its ultimate concern is the fate of the company’s employees.
In the ongoing J.C. Penney bankruptcy, for instance, where more than 70,000 employees’ jobs depend on the retailer’s ability to execute a complex restructuring sale in the next month or so, the Texas bankruptcy judge presiding over the case put it this way: “I’m trying to balance the concerns of everyone involved,” U.S. bankruptcy Judge David Jones said at a hearing Monday. “I have 70,000 people who need a job, I have stores in small towns that don’t have alternatives, I have shareholders who believe that they’re entitled to value.”
Bankruptcy for the employee
In a corporate bankruptcy, employees are generally considered unsecured creditors, lower in the bankruptcy code’s priority scheme for who gets repaid first.
In that category, employees are technically more or less on equal footing as vendors, landlords and others. But unless they have a union representing them, store staff don’t necessarily get a formal role on bankruptcy creditors’ committees that help direct the process, which usually include other large unsecured creditor groups. In 2019, just 6.2 percent of private sector employees belonged to a union, according to data released in January by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
For employees losing their jobs as a result of bankruptcy, labor experts say it can also be challenging to navigate questions about features like severance and payment for unused benefits. While those questions are typically governed by federal and state workplace laws, such protections may be suspended during a bankruptcy.
“Bankruptcy law changes a lot of the law that exists, and that governs employees and others outside of bankruptcy,” said Richard Seltzer, partner at Cohen Weiss and Simon LLP, who has represented the Workers United union in the bankruptcies of Barneys New York last fall, and Brooks Brothers this year. “And it’s sometimes a very hard adjustment to realize that what you depended on normally doesn’t necessarily exist.”


But employees may have some leverage during high profile bankruptcy proceedings that draw public scrutiny, particularly when they are staying on to do things like conduct store closing sales.
As retailers use the Chapter 11 process to re-evaluate leases, close less profitable stores and renegotiate rent on those they plan to keep open, such sales are a valuable source of revenue and a way to offload excess inventory. But they are time-sensitive, even during a pandemic, as they must take place within tight deadlines dictated by the terms of the retailer’s debtor-in-possession loans and any restructuring agreement with lenders.
J.C. Penney, which has reopened hundreds of stores around the country during the pandemic in order to facilitate its quick exit from bankruptcy, has made an acknowledgement of employees’ work in conducting going-out-of-business sales. The retailer, which had paid out roughly $10 million to a group of top executives including a $4.5 million cash incentive to chief executive officer Jill Soltau before its bankruptcy filing in May, has since obtained a Texas bankruptcy court’s approval for additional payments to other employees in its 70,000-strong staff.
In June, Penney’s outlined payments for associates at its closing stores in the form of retention, severance and incentive bonus programs, at a time when those employees were still furloughed after pandemic-related lockdowns in March and April.
The company sought a total of up to $14.5 million in severance for some 2,200 employees, including some hourly associates and all salaried associates including general managers, supervisors, designers and others. It also sought up to $2.5 million in retention bonuses for roughly 9,100 employees including certain groups of managers or hourly associates, and an additional store-closing bonus program to provide a total of up to $250,000 to a group of eligible employees. Penney’s also sought to pay up to $4.3 million for unused paid time off for more than 4,800 eligible employees, according to court filings.
“It is necessary to do so because today those stores are closed and those employees today are on furlough,” said James Mesterharm, managing director at AlixPartners LLP, a financial adviser for J.C. Penney, told the court at a bankruptcy hearing in June. “In order for us to reopen those stores for the going-out-of-business processes and to have store employees help us with that process, to maximize the value of inventory, sales, it is important for us to have an engaged workforce and one that is assisting the company through that process in a productive manner.”
Penney’s, which entered its bankruptcy with some 846 physical stores, has indicated in its Texas bankruptcy court filings this summer that it plans to close more than 240 locations. In June, as soon as some states began to lift lockdowns on non-essential businesses, the retailer began the process of closing some 154 stores, estimating that each store closing sale would take roughly 10 to 16 weeks to complete in order to “maximize the value of the inventory,” as its advisors have told the court.
Life after liquidation
In the case of a liquidation, and particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, retail employees face conditions that can be grueling and often unsafe.
Two former sales employees at the now shuttered Art Van furniture chain described to WWD how, during the store’s bankruptcy sales, they had faced throngs of irate customers crowding stores beyond capacity and demanding to know why they wouldn’t receive their orders. The employees also said they were concerned about having to face large numbers of angry customers in close proximity inside their stores during the COVID-19 outbreak, and losing their health insurance during Art Van’s bankruptcy in March.
“You had people in your face, and they were yelling at you, calling out your name, and you’re trying to explain, ‘You know, I’m sorry, at this point, all I can tell you is to either try and pick something else or we’ll give you something else for the money,” said Shirley Smith, a former sales manager at Art Van’s Taylor, Mich., location, who had worked at the company for 23 years.
“And when people are angry, spit flies, and they’re in your face,” she added. “We were very much at risk, and didn’t know it.”
Laura Virgo, a former Art Van store manager at another Michigan location, described daylong efforts at crowd control, even fielding threats from customers.
“I hadn’t even had a sip of water or used the bathroom all day,” Virgo said of her first day handling a store closing sale in March. “I mean, just like, it didn’t stop. It was overrun, unsafe, there was no regard about our health or safety and putting us in that position.”
“The timing of it, where the liquidation takes place just as the pandemic is coming through, it really diluted the accountability that they should have, to what they did,” Virgo said.
A representative for Thomas H. Lee Partners, an investment company that had acquired Art Van’s assets in 2017, declined to comment.
In June, Democratic lawmakers including Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois introduced “The Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act,” targeted at some of the inequalities built into the process. The bill sought to prioritize paying employees severance, and restricting the kind of bonus payments that bankrupt retailers often seek for their top leadership, according to a statement by Sen. Durbin at the time.
Neiman Marcus, whose bankruptcy is ongoing since May, had paid out some $4 million in bonuses to its chief executive officer Geoffroy van Raemdonck in February, in what the company’s advisers have told the court were performance related bonuses. In addition, the company had also paid out pre-bankruptcy retention bonuses to other executives within a month before it filed for Chapter 11, at a time when it had furloughed the vast majority of its roughly 13,200 employees.
In July, the retailer also won the Texas bankruptcy court’s approval for a Key Employee Incentive Plan that would provide up to $10 million in bonuses to a group of executives. And its proposed reorganization plan, which is subject to a confirmation hearing scheduled for this week, also includes a management incentive plan, one of its advisers said in court.
Neiman Marcus has brought back most of its furloughed employees at this point, and has currently opened 43 Neiman Marcus stores, two Bergdorf Goodman stores, and five Last Call stores. But most of its Last Call locations will be shuttered as part of the bankruptcy, and full-time associates of those closed stores were offered “severance and access to job placement services,” a company representative said.
While the Democrats’ bill isn’t expected to gain traction in a Republican-controlled Senate, and is generally viewed as more of a symbolic gesture, it still plays a role in articulating the inequities of the bankruptcy process, said Duff, the University of Wyoming law professor.
“I almost don’t care whether it’s political theater or not,” he said, of the bill. “The fact that somebody took the time to craft an alternative vision of what bankruptcy could look like, I think is important.”