Barron's ; Europe’s Auto Sector Is Cheap. Get Ready for a Rebound.

Europe’s Auto Sector Is Cheap. Get Ready for a Rebound.

The global semiconductor shortage has made this year a tough one for the European auto industry but it also makes the sector a potential buying opportunity heading into 2022.

Chip supply issues have forced production cuts at the world’s largest car makers, with many seeing problems continuing into 2022. European car sales hit a record low in October, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association.

It’s not just sales that are flirting with lows; it’s valuations too. The MSCI Europe Automobiles and Components index currently trades at 6.8 times forward earnings, not far off record lows of 5.2 times in April 2020, and well below the 14.6 times for the wider MSCI Europe index.

Investors may need patience, though, as the first half of the year is likely to be plagued by chip shortages and production woes. The issues will subside at some point, and the recovery will then take hold, auto makers and analysts say.

Morgan Stanley strategists, led by Graham Secker, named autos as their ‘top cyclical value pick’ but cautioned that the near-term is uncertain. Still, “the sector is likely to see easy comparables and good EPS momentum roll into 2022,” they said.

JPMorgan analysts see global production recovering in the second half of 2022, at which point suppliers “should clearly outperform” car manufacturers. French car parts supplier Faurecia (ticker: EO.France) is a top pick due to its strong exposure to fast-growing regions, such as China, and customers like major manufacturers Tesla (TSLA) and Stellantis (STLA). The bank has a 60 euro ($67.89) target stock price, a 54% gain from a recent price of €39.48.

Shares have fallen 18.5% in the past month as the threat of the Omicron variant hit the sector, and Faurecia issued a second profit warning, citing downward revisions to automotive production in Europe. Deutsche Bank analysts, which also have Faurecia as one of their European top picks for 2022, said the outlook was “relatively de-risked” following the company’s warning. “We continue to see Faurecia as well positioned to capture volume upside,” they said. Deutsche Bank’s Christoph Laskawi has a €50 price target with a Buy rating.

Faurecia, with a market value of €5.4 billion, employs more than 114,000 people across 266 industrial sites and 39 R&D centers in 35 countries. The company estimates that one in three vehicles in the world use its technology.

The company’s merger with German automotive lighting group Hella, expected to close in early 2022, may be a trump card in the investment case. The acquisition will create the world’s seventh largest global automotive supplier, according to Faurecia. Still, the merged entity trades at 8.1 times estimated 2022 earnings, a 30% discount to peers, UBS analyst David Lesne noted.

“The Hella deal upside is not priced in, in our view, as the merged entity currently trades on a sharp discount,” he said. “Delivering on the synergies (not reflected in our estimates) could provide further upside.” The deal also helps Faurecia reduce its exposure to sales of internal combustion engines from 25% to less than 10% by 2025.

Traditional car manufacturers still stand to benefit from the volume recovery and ought not to be ignored. Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany), which Barron’s highlighted in this column in September as a buying opportunity, remains a good option for investors.

The stock has fallen 25% from 2021 highs reached in April, and its recent price of €184 looks attractive, particularly when the German auto maker’s ambitious electric vehicle plans are factored in. Analysts have an average target price of €249.52.

Barron's : Here Are Barron’s 10 Top Stocks for the New Year

The U.S. stock market hasn’t followed the script in 2021. The S&P 500 index returned 26% through Dec. 16, well ahead of the roughly 10% gain projected, on average, by strategists at the start of the year.

Many expected value stocks to finally best their growth counterparts after a decade of underperformance. But after a strong start this year, value is ending in a familiar place, about five percentage points behind growth, based on the large-cap Russell 1000 index.

Every December, we identify 10 promising stocks for the new year. Our picks for 2022 have a value tilt and reflect input from Barron’s writers, in particular Eric J. Savitz, Al Root, and Nicholas Jasinski.

The selections: Royal Dutch Shell (ticker: RDS.B), IBM (IBM), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Hertz Global Holdings (HTZ), Amazon.com (AMZN), Visa (V), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A and BRK.B), Nordstrom (JWN), AT&T (T), and General Motors (GM). Nine are new; Berkshire is the only holdover.

Our picks for 2021, out on Dec. 18, 2020, narrowly trailed the S&P 500, returning 26.9% on average, less than a percentage point behind the benchmark average. We nabbed some big gainers in Alphabet (GOOGL), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Eaton (ETN), and Apple (AAPL), but flopped with Merck (MRK), gold miner Newmont (NEM), and Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE).

READ MORE ON OUR OUTLOOK FOR 2022
Don’t Expect Big Returns From the Stock Market Next Year, Experts Say
The backdrop for stocks could be tougher in 2022 after three consecutive years of big gains—the S&P 500 returned 31.5% in 2019 and 18.4% in 2020. The Federal Reserve is widely expected to raise interest rates in 2022. That could help value stocks finally win out over their growth counterparts.

Here are Barron’s 10 stock picks for 2022, in alphabetical order:

Amazon.com
Amazon.com ’s dominance in two major businesses makes it a rarity. It has a 40% share of the U.S. e-commerce market and about half of the lucrative cloud-computing sector, through Amazon Web Services. An estimated 85 million U.S. households are Prime members.

The stock, recently at $3,377, has trailed the market in the past year. It still isn’t cheap, trading for 66 times projected 2022 earnings, but none of its megacap internet peers has better prospects. Amazon’s fastest-growing businesses, like AWS and advertising, have high margins.

Evercore analyst Mark Mahaney sees 20%-plus annual revenue gains and expanding margins over the next two to three years. He has an Outperform rating on Amazon, with a price target of $4,300.

Mahaney calls Amazon the “TAMiest” of the megacap internet companies because of the huge opportunities in retail and cloud computing, while offering “the best mix shift in tech.” TAM refers to “total addressable market.”

With more than $60 billion in annual sales, Amazon Web Services could be worth $1 trillion alone. That means investors are paying about $700 billion for the rest, which includes the leading online retail business, offline shopping (including Whole Foods Market), advertising, media (Amazon Prime Video, Audible), and logistics, including warehouses, trucks, and planes.

Two potential pluses for 2022 would be a spinoff of AWS or a long-awaited stock split.

AT&T
There is a price for everything, including AT&T, which recently hit a 13-year low. The stock, now around $23, is off 18% in 2021 and amounts to a cheap play on the depressed telecom and media sectors.

The shares have been hit lately by renewed concerns about competitive conditions in the wireless market. The bull case is that AT&T will become a simpler company with less debt after it combines its WarnerMedia business with Discovery (DISCA) in a deal due to close in mid-2022. A more focused management could deliver strong results after years of distraction from overpriced acquisitions.

And the wireless business could get more rational, considering that there are only three leading players: AT&T, Verizon Communications (VZ), and T-Mobile US (TMUS).

AT&T now yields 9%; that should fall to about 6% after a planned dividend reduction following the WarnerMedia deal. Here’s the math: AT&T plans to pay out about 40% of $20 billion in projected 2023 free cash flow. That equates to a roughly $1.10 annual payout. That should translate into a 6% yield after reflecting the current value of Discovery stock that will be received by AT&T.

The company may spin off Discovery to holders or exchange the Discovery stock for AT&T shares with holders in a split-off. Whatever the mechanism, AT&T should have one of the highest yields in the S&P 500.

Berkshire Hathaway
When Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett made his initial equity gift to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2006, he wrote that Berkshire’s stock is an “ideal asset to underpin the long-term well-being of a foundation.”

“The company has a multitude of diversified and powerful streams of earnings, Gibraltar-like financial strength, and a deeply imbedded culture of acting in the best interests of shareholders.”

That’s still the case 15 years later.

The Class A stock, at about $454,550, is up 31% this year. Buffett refuses to pay a dividend, but Berkshire has ramped up its stock buybacks and should repurchase more than 4% of its shares this year. It trades for 1.35 times our estimate of year-end book value, a cheap level, given that its businesses are probably worth much more than their carrying values.

Berkshire’s stake in Apple (AAPL) alone is worth $160 billion, following the iPhone maker’s recent run-up.

General Motors
Tesla (TSLA) may not be the only winner as the auto industry transitions to electric vehicles. General Motors is as well positioned as any of its peers and is valued at less than a tenth of Tesla, at $85 billion. GM, at about $58, trades for eight times projected 2022 earnings.

Led by CEO Mary Barra, GM has lofty plans to roughly double its annual revenue to about $300 billion by 2030. That includes $90 billion in sales of electric vehicles, up from a projected $10 billion in 2023. GM is expected to soon unveil its all-electric Silverado.
Investors are skeptical that GM can manage a tricky EV transition and achieve anything close to its ambitious goals, but the stock already discounts a lot of doubt.

“GM has built a scalable platform and is a leader in both autonomous vehicles and batteries,” says investor Ross Margolies of Stelliam Capital Management.

General Motors’ controlling stake in Cruise, a top player in autonomous driving that plans to roll out robo-taxis in the coming years, is worth about $17 billion based on the latest minority investment. GM talks about generating $50 billion of revenue from Cruise by 2030.

A GM bull, Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas has a $75 price target on the stock, and conservatively ascribes no value to its legacy car business.

GM enthusiast Ryan Brinkman at J.P. Morgan looks at it differently, saying that investors effectively are getting Cruise and other newer businesses for free, based on the high profitability of its sales of pickups and sport utility vehicles powered by internal combustion engines.

Hertz Global Holdings
Rental cars are the best business in travel now, as auto shortages have led to strong pricing and high used-car prices.

Hertz Global Holdings and rivals Avis Budget Group (CAR) and privately held Enterprise—which control a combined 95% of the U.S. market—are cleaning up after years of mediocre returns.

Jeffries analyst Hamzah Mazari has said, “What once was a dysfunctional oligopoly with no pricing power is a functional oligopoly with pricing power.” Anyone who has rented a car since the spring can probably attest to that.

Hertz, which emerged from bankruptcy in June, is in great shape for 2022. It will have a clean balance sheet with minimal net debt (excluding asset-backed securities) after the payoff of high-rate preferred stock, and is taking profitable initiatives like the purchase of 100,000 Teslas by the end of 2022 and a deal to sell used cars through Carvana (CVNA).

Hertz shares, at about $21, are inexpensive, trading for less than nine times projected 2022 earnings. J.P. Morgan analyst Brinkman has an Overweight rating and a $30 price target, citing “strong industry tailwinds and a multitude of company-specific drivers.”

IBM
IBM could be one of the big turnaround stories of 2022. Barron’s highlighted the company’s improving outlook in a recent cover story, calling it “ Microsoft Jr.”

Under CEO Arvind Krishna, IBM has spun off a pedestrian business of managing data centers into Kyndryl Holdings (KD), refocused on the cloud and artificial intelligence, and vowed to start growing again for the first time in about a decade.

Wall Street is skeptical about IBM’s prospects, but one bull, BofA Global Research’s Wamsi Mohan, has compared Krishna to Satya Nadella, the Microsoft CEO who transformed the company over the past seven years.

IBM, whose shares trade around $126, is valued at 11 times projected 2022 earnings. And it has the highest dividend yield in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, at 5.3%.

If Krishna is successful in boosting sales and margins while making IBM relevant again, there could be a lot of upside in a largely forgotten stock.

Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson is shaking off its stodgy image as it moves to develop a broad and underappreciated drug portfolio and spin off its consumer business.

The stock, now priced around $173, trades for a reasonable 17 times projected 2022 earnings of $10.38 a share and has a secure 2.5% dividend yield.

The world’s largest healthcare company recently spent a day highlighting opportunities among its existing drugs and its pipeline. These include Darzalex for multiple myeloma, Tremfya for psoriasis, and Rybrevant for lung cancer.

Johnson & Johnson aims to expand its pharmaceutical sales by 5% annually, to $60 billion, by 2025 and have 13 drugs with annual sales of $1 billion or more.

Some analysts came away impressed. Citi Research’s Joanne Wuensch lauded the “breadth and depth” of the drug portfolio. She has a Buy rating and $192 price target. J&J is also a big producer of medical devices.

The spinoff of the consumer products business, which includes Tylenol, Listerine, and Band-Aids, may not add a lot of value, however. And the company’s potential legal liability for talc and opioids remains a risk.

Some investors would like to see Johnson & Johnson ramp up a small buyback program, given its earnings power and conservative balance sheet. J&J boasts one of only two triple-A credit ratings among U.S. corporations. Microsoft has the other.

Nordstrom
Nordstrom looks like a cheap play on high-end retailing. At about $20, the stock trades for about 10 times projected 2022 earnings and for just 50% of sales, based on its enterprise value (market value plus net debt), a discount to nearly all of its peers.

Evercore analyst Omar Saad is among the few Wall Street bulls on Nordstrom. He sees a favorable risk/reward. He projects $2.20 in 2022 earnings and says the stock could hold at about $20, even if profits fall to $1.50. In a bullish scenario in which margins and sales outpace expectations, Nordstrom could earn $4 a share and the stock could top its high of $46 in March.

The company gets 40% of its sales online and has rationalized its physical footprint to about 100 full-service stores, while using small neighborhood stores in urban areas for online pickups, returns, and alterations.

Given its family control, Nordstrom is apt to resist any attempt by activist investors to spin off its online business along the lines of what Macy’s (M) and Kohl’s (KSS) are facing.

Still, a deal for the company isn’t out of question, given a digestible market value of little more than $3 billion.

Royal Dutch Shell
Energy supplies could be tight and prices high for years. Royal Dutch Shell stands to capitalize as one of the world’s top energy operations. It trades at a significant discount to its U.S. peers, Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX).

Shell’s U.S.-listed shares trade around $43, just seven times projected 2022 earnings, against a price/earnings ratio of 11 for Exxon and 12 for Chevron. Shell yields 3.9%, less than Exxon or Chevron. Shell, however, has a conservative payout ratio at about 30%, after a sharp dividend cut in 2020.

Shell is “one of the cheapest large-cap stocks in the world,” wrote activist investor Dan Loeb of Third Point, which has taken a stake.

Its best business may be the world’s largest liquefied natural-gas operations, which requires only modest annual capital expenditures.

Loeb’s push for a breakup of Shell looks like a long shot, but it’s possible that the company will take public a part of the world’s biggest network of service stations.

Bernstein analyst Oswald Clint praised the energy giant’s recent move to simplify its corporate structure by domiciling in the United Kingdom and collapsing its two share classes into one. Clint sees the company’s stock buybacks ramping up in 2022 and has a price target of $63 on the American depositary receipts.

Shell’s discount to its U.S. rivals reflects the intense pressure in Europe to scale back its oil and gas operations. That remains a risk, but Shell is committed to its core business.

Visa
Visa is the juggernaut of the payments business, processing over $13 trillion in transactions during its fiscal year ending in September.

The stock, at about $214, looks appealing after a 15% decline from a 52-week high in July.

Visa trades for about 30 times projected earnings of about $7 a share in its current fiscal year. While not cheap, its multiple looks reasonable, considering its lucrative global duopoly with Mastercard (MA), the shift away from cash, new services, and the prospect of double-digit annual revenue and earnings gains. Merchants may gripe about interchange fees, but Visa remains indispensable.

Visa sees revenue rising in the “high end of midteens” in its current fiscal year, and analysts forecast 20% growth in earnings per share. The company continues to see recovery from depressed pandemic activity.

David Rolfe of Wedgewood Partners, a Visa holder, says, “Visa will get a big boost when borders reopen—but even after that normalizes, Visa should be able to grow volumes and revenue at double digits.”

Morgan Stanley analyst James Faucette has an Overweight rating and a $280 price target on the stock.

Barron's : Don’t Expect Big Returns From the Stock Market Next Year as Interest

Don’t Expect Big Returns From the Stock Market Next Year as Interest Rates Rise

For investors, this has been a year like no other. Stocks soared, bonds slumped, Bitcoin went bonkers—on the upside and down—and nonfungible tokens became a head-scratching asset class, after an NFT of a digital collage by an artist known as Beeple sold at auction for $69 million. By our math, that equates to 339 times the annual salary of the chairman of the Federal Reserve, which flooded the pandemic-plagued U.S. economy with trillions of dollars in stimulus over the past two years, inflating the price of numerous assets.

This past week, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell announced that the U.S. central bank will accelerate the taper of its stimulus spending in a bid to combat the highest inflation rates since 1982. Therein lies the first clue that 2022 is unlikely to resemble the year now drawing to a close. The Fed’s hawkish turn paves the way for an increase in interest rates—probably several—for the first time since 2018. Meanwhile, corporate earnings and economic growth are expected to decelerate next year. About the only constant: the persistence of Covid-19.

ALSO READ:
Barron’s 10 Stock Picks for 2022
Telecom Stocks Suffered This Year. That Won’t Change in 2022
Auto Makers Made Some Bold EV Promises. Now They Have to Deliver.
Will the Chip Shortage Finally End in 2022?
All of this adds up to a forecast for diminished equity returns, negative returns on bonds, and increased volatility across asset classes. With the stock and bond markets both priced for perfection, equity investors will need to focus next year on quality companies that can control their own fate, irrespective of macroeconomic trends. Fixed-income investors might need to look beyond traditional bonds for decent yields, while investors in commodities and real estate could find attractive inflation hedges.


Uncredited
Here’s a look at the economic and investment outlook for 2022, based on our conversations with economists and market strategists over the past few weeks.

The Economy
The Covid-induced recession of 2020 officially lasted just two months, but was one of the deepest economic contractions in history. The rebound has been just as dramatic, and should continue in 2022. At the same time, supply-chain pressures, labor shortages, and inflation all could persist. The fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus could restrain travel and leisure spending, but an increase in the vaccinated population should help society carry on.

“Consumer and capital spending will continue to drive the economy next year, but we’ll return to a more normal growth rate,” says Wall Street economist Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.

He sees U.S. gross domestic product increasing by 3.3% in 2022, down from this year’s expected growth rate of more than 5%.

““Consumer and capital spending will…drive the economy next year, but we’ll return to a more normal growth rate.”

— Economist Ed Yardeni
The key variable for investors in 2022 will be the path of inflation, and central banks’ response. Returns for many asset classes could depend not just on when, but also how forcefully the Fed and other central banks withdraw the stimulus unleashed in 2020.

Based on the consumer price index, U.S. inflation rose by 6.8%, year over year, in November. Most economists expect inflation to remain high in the first half of 2022, before easing as supply-chain issues are resolved. But the consensus is for inflation to settle around 3%, well above the Fed’s 2% target and the 1.5%-to-2% range seen during much of the decade preceding the Covid pandemic.

The Economy: Still Strong
Although forecasts vary, the U.S. economy could continue to grow at a decent pace in 2022, propelled by strong consumer demand. The Fed's favorite inflation measure looks likely to peak.
“Inflation is set up numerically to abate; we won’t get another rise in energy prices [on the order of this year’s increase],” says Diane Swonk, chief economist at Grant Thornton. Yet, inflation has become more “broad-based,” she notes, pointing to rising shelter costs and wages, in particular. “There is the risk of it becoming entrenched and producing a wage-price spiral,” she says.

Even after supply pressures ease, strong household balance sheets and a tight labor market are likely to keep consumer demand high, while giving workers leverage and pushing up wages. That should put a floor under inflation at about 3%, but price increases won’t be economically destructive. “This isn’t the type of inflation that kills growth,” says Jefferies’ chief financial economist, Aneta Markowska. “This isn’t a stagflationary scenario.”

The Fed is still injecting stimulus into an economy that hardly needs it, economists say. Based on the Fed’s latest announcement, its asset-buying program is on pace to end in March. The median forecast of policy committee members calls for three quarter-point rate hikes in 2022, followed by three more in 2023.

The bond market is pricing in a targeted federal-funds rate of 0.75%-1.00% by the end of next year, up from 0%-0.25% now. That’s not a high nominal level of interest rates, and they will remain negative after adjusting for inflation. But three increases would mark a meaningful shift that could be felt across financial and other markets.

Ultralow interest rates push investors to take more risks, moving from Treasuries into corporate credit, from bonds to stocks, and from defensive shares to more speculative ones. When rates begin to rise, investors typically reverse course.

Equities
The S&P 500 index has returned 26%, including dividends, this year, following an 18% return in 2020. Strategists forecast more-muted gains for next year, with year-end targets ranging from the mid-4000s to the low-5000 area, versus Thursday’s close of 4668. A target of 5100 implies a price increase of around 9%, before a dividend yield of about 1.3%.

Expect a tug of war between rising earnings and pressured price/earnings ratios, capping the market’s gains. S&P 500 earnings are on track to rise nearly 50% this year; the average Wall Street forecast calls for profit growth of about 9% in 2022. As interest rates rise, the present value of future earnings will fall.

RELATED MARKET DATA
Stocks

Mike Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s chief investment officer and chief U.S. equity strategist, has an above-consensus earnings forecast for 2022, but he’s below consensus on valuation. He expects the S&P 500’s P/E ratio to contract to 18 by the end of ’22, in line with the five-year average and still in the top quintile for the past 30 years, but below the current multiple of roughly 21.

Stocks: A Mixed Picture
Market strategists see muted gains, if any, for the S&P 500 in 2022, as inflation persists, the Federal Reserve ends its asset-buying program, and interest rates rise.
“When the Fed goes from a $1.4 trillion annualized pace of asset purchases to zero in four months, that will absolutely have an impact on multiples,” he says. “That’s not the end of the world, but it does make the opportunity set narrower.”

Valuation pressure on the major stock indexes makes stock-picking all the more important. Companies that can control their own fate should be able to weather a macro storm best. Strong profit margins and pricing power will be key, and below-average valuations will provide a cushion if the broad market’s P/E contracts.

Wilson screened for companies that meet those criteria and are recommended by Morgan Stanley analysts. The list includes AbbVie (ticker: ABBV), Activision Blizzard (ATVI), Cisco Systems (CSCO), Comcast (CMCSA), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), and Oracle (ORCL).

Wilson recommends a defensive tilt for 2022, and favors healthcare and real estate. Both sectors have relatively stable earnings and face less risk from the supply-chain issues and wage pressures afflicting some other sectors. Valuations below the market average and positive exposure to rising rates also make financials, especially banks, attractive for 2022, Wilson says.

Saira Malik, chief investment officer and head of global equities at Nuveen, expects valuations to hold fairly steady next year, but sees earnings growth slowing sharply and volatility increasing. “Multiples will start to contract when earnings become an issue,” she says. “We’ve already seen earnings growth peak, but we haven’t seen a peak in actual earnings.”

Malik also finds more to like under the market’s surface in 2022 than at the index level, and she sees better value beyond the S&P 500. She prefers companies with pricing power and cyclical exposure to an economy still growing at an above-average rate. She’s also looking outside the U.S., to other developed markets including Europe’s, which investors can track via the Vanguard FTSE Europe exchange-traded fund (VGK). Emerging markets sport cheaper valuations than the S&P 500, but China’s regulatory and economic issues makes them a less attractive bet.

Energy is Malik’s favorite sector for 2022. Energy-company shares have below-market multiples, and higher oil and gas prices should provide a tailwind as supply stays tight and demand increases. U.S. energy companies are increasingly focusing on returning cash to shareholders, rather than pursuing production growth, making them more attractive to a broader universe of investors.

ConocoPhillips (COP) is one of Malik’s picks, and also makes Wilson’s screen. Malik sees the Houston-based company lifting its dividends and stock buybacks, and is a fan of its management team. She applauds Conoco’s recent acquisitions, including Concho Resources and Royal Dutch Shell ’s (RDS.B) assets in the Permian Basin. Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) is another energy pick for both Malik and Wilson.

Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities’ head of U.S. equity and quantitative strategy, is overweight healthcare for 2022, which she calls “the forgotten sector” because it has lagged behind the S&P 500 by eight percentage points since the start of 2020. That’s despite strong near-term fundamentals and an attractive long-term outlook, with aging demographics and innovations in medical robotics, new drug-development technologies, and advanced treatments expected to boost future sales.

Most healthcare companies fit the quality theme. Demand for their products doesn’t depend on economic cycles, and research-intensive businesses are hard for new entrants to disrupt. S&P 500 healthcare stocks are trading at a near-record discount, relative to the index, Subramanian says.

The Health Care Select Sector SPDR (XLV) includes a basket of S&P 500 stocks in the sector. Nuveen’s Malik also recommends Zimmer Biomet Holdings (ZBH), a maker of artificial knees, hips, and other medical devices. As elective procedures that were deferred during the Covid pandemic resume, Zimmer will benefit, she says. The stock trades for 15 times expected 2022 earnings.

For broad quality-factor exposure, there’s the iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL), says Gargi Chaudhuri, head of Americas investment strategy at BlackRock ’s iShares unit. That fund includes shares of large- and mid-cap U.S. companies with strong balance sheets, high returns on equity, and stable earnings. Chaudhuri also recommends more-concentrated industry bets via the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT).
Banks are a popular call for 2022. Lower-than-average valuations and excess capital on industry balance sheets make for an attractive starting point. Plus, banks’ bread-and-butter business model of extending loans will benefit from higher interest rates. Subramanian also sees the potential for higher dividends and buybacks in the sector in 2022, offering investors “inflation-protected yield.”

Another Wilson screen for quality stocks levered to inflation yields many financials, including Charles Schwab (SCHW), U.S. Bancorp (USB), and PNC Financial Services Group (PNC).

Fixed Income
Persistent inflation and the beginning of the Fed’s next tightening cycle will reverberate through the fixed-income markets in 2022. The low yield on the 10-year Treasury note has been one of the more puzzling features of this year; it peaked at about 1.75% in March before falling back below 1.25% by the summer and 1.41% recently.

Fixed-income strategists see the 10-year yield climbing to about 2% next year—not a huge move but enough to drag down bond prices, which move inversely to yields.

Treasuries still play a role in a balanced portfolio, says Dan Ivascyn, group chief investment officer at Pimco. “We think high-quality bonds still provide protection against many negative economic scenarios, [although] less than they would have provided in the past,” he says. “We saw it recently with the onset of Omicron-related concerns; you had a big rally [in bonds].”

Andy McCormick, head of fixed income at T. Rowe Price , expects more volatility in 2022 as the Fed tapers its bond purchases and begins to raise interest rates. That should mean wider credit spreads—the difference between the yield on a corporate bond and a risk-free benchmark like Treasuries. He’d like to see spreads widen before adding more aggressively to his corporate bond holdings.

“Bonds do three things: protect principal, serve as a hedge against equities, and provide income,” says McCormick. “The third category is tested now, with negative real rates. But the other two still apply in times of stress.”

Fixed Income: Yielding to Reality
With inflation running hot, the Fed is expected to lift interest rates next year. That could put the 10-year Treasury yield at or above 2% for the first time since mid-2019.
Unlike traditional bonds, Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, see the value of their principal rise with inflation, protecting against nominal price increases in the economy. They pay a fixed rate of interest twice a year on that adjusted principal. When inflation is present, the interest payments increase.

TIPS have been in high demand in 2021: the iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) has returned more than 4.5% this year, versus a 1.5% loss for the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond index. Chaudhuri recommends that ETF for 2022, along with the iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP).

She also cites the iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT), which includes a basket of bonds whose interest payments will rise as benchmark interest rates increase. As such, it provides some protection against the Fed’s policy shifts next year.

McCormick makes the case for income-generating assets with floating rates. Bank loans are one option, with generally low duration exposure. The T. Rowe Price Floating Rate fund (PRFRX) is active in that space, and the firm recently agreed to acquire $53 billion private credit manager Oak Hill Advisors.

Investors might need to look far beyond traditional bonds to generate attractive yields in 2022. Areas such as bank loans, private credit funds, and business development companies, or BDCs, plus strategies like covered call writing look promising. ETFs with exposure to these include SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan (SRLN), Virtus Private Credit Strategy (VPC), VanEck BDC Income (BIZD), and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call (QYLD). All sport yields that dwarf those of most traditional bonds.

“The bottom line is that yields are low,” says Ivascyn. “So, to maintain the same type of income level you’ve grown accustomed to, you generally have to take on more risk. There are rarely free lunches in markets.”

Commodities
Commodities could be a good place to seek inflation protection in 2022. Jeff Currie, Goldman Sachs ’ global head of commodities research, says a commodities “supercycle” is in the early innings of a multiyear stretch. That’s not just pandemic-related: Years of underinvestment in global oil and gas projects will keep supply tight, relative to demand, for years to come.

Currie doesn’t expect the shift to renewables to begin to slow demand growth for fossil fuels until 2025, or to put pressure on prices until the early 2030s. And, industrial metals prices should boom as governments spend on decarbonization and infrastructure. He has 2022 targets of $12,000 per ton for copper and $3,250 for aluminum, implying plenty of upside for both. He sees U.S. crude oil around $80 a barrel at the end of next year, some 15% above the current level.
BlackRock’s Chaudhuri recommends having commodities in a diversified portfolio, and points to the iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). It includes a basket of futures tied to energy, metals, and agricultural commodities. When inflation is high and dollars lose value, commodities priced in the currency are worth more dollars.

That’s true for real assets broadly, too. Chaudhuri recommends exposure to infrastructure assets via the iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA), which could benefit from recently passed infrastructure legislation. She also likes real estate investment trusts, or REITs, via the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR). Both funds provide dividend income and act as potential inflation hedges.

Bottom line: Even if 2022 brings more turmoil, there should be many places where investors can hide—and prosper.

>>> US Close Dow -1.48% S&P -1.03% Nasdaq -0.07% Russell +1% VIX 21.57 +4.86%

Closing Stock Market Summary

The S&P 500 fell 1.0% on this quadruple witching-options expiration Friday, as the market was influenced by growth concerns and technical factors. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.5%, while the Nasdaq Composite decreased just 0.1% and the Russell 2000 gained 1.0%.

The COVID-19 situation seemed to weigh on the market with sporting events continuing to get postponed, President Biden warning of "winter of severe illness and death" for those unvaccinated against COVID-19, and former FDA Commissioner Gottlieb suggesting that businesses in New York might voluntarily close for a few weeks due to surging cases.

All 11 S&P 500 sectors closed lower, led by the cyclical financials (-2.3%), energy (-2.3%), and industrials (-1.7%) sectors; the Treasury yield curve flattened amid increased demand for longer-dated maturities; and oil prices ($70.93, -1.43, -2.0%) settled sharply lower. The real estate sector (-0.3%) declined the least.

Technical factors were most evident in the S&P 500, which found support at its 50-day moving average (4604) after it dipped below the level in the morning. The mega-caps lifted the benchmark index off those lows, as investors presumably saw their recent declines as a good buying opportunity.

Similarly, small-caps and retail stocks saw some relief after lagging in recent weeks, benefiting from rotation-minded activity. The Russell 2000 and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT 87.99, +0.45, +0.5%) both entered the session in correction territory, or down more than 10.0% from recent highs.

Oracle (ORCL 96.61, -6.61, -6.4%) saw no relief after The Wall Street Journal reported that the company is in discussions to acquire Cerner (CERN 89.77, +10.28, +12.9%) for as much as $30 billion. ORCL shares fell 6% while CERN shares rose 13%.

Rivian (RIVN 97.70, -11.17, -10.3%) dropped 10% after missing EPS estimates while FedEx (FDX 250.32, +11.80, +5.0%) rose 5% on pleasing earnings news. FedEx also authorized a new $5 billion share repurchase program.

Recapping the price action in the Treasury market, the 2-yr yield increased three basis points to 0.64% while the 10-yr yield decreased two basis points to 1.40%. The U.S. Dollar Index gained 0.7% to 96.68.

Investors did not receive any economic data on Friday. Looking ahead, the Conference Board will release its Leading Economic Index for November on Monday.

  • S&P 500 +23.0% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite +17.7% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +15.6% YTD
  • Russell 2000 +10.1% YTD

WSJ : Family Business Deals Help Fuel Carvana’s Explosive Growth

Family Business Deals Help Fuel Carvana’s Explosive Growth
Online used-car seller says it will keep striking new deals with companies controlled by CEO’s father, Carvana’s largest shareholder

When Ernie Garcia III came up with a plan to disrupt the used-car market by taking it online, he got help from his auto-dealer father.

A decade later, the company he created, Carvana Co. CVNA -2.37% , is worth nearly $40 billion and sold around 400,000 cars this year. It is still leaning on Mr. Garcia III’s father for support.

Mr. Garcia III spun Carvana out of DriveTime Automotive Group Inc., a 132-dealer chain started in the 1990s by his father, Ernie Garcia II. Mr. Garcia III grew up around the business, and went to work there shortly after graduating from Stanford University in 2005 with entrepreneurial ambitions.

The Garcias took Carvana public in 2017 with agreements to pay DriveTime for various business services. Last year, Mr. Garcia II’s companies took in around $85 million in revenue from providing extended warranties to Carvana buyers, collecting on their loans, and selling or leasing real estate, according to Carvana filings.

Carvana, known for its car vending-machine towers, has continued to strike new related-party deals with companies controlled by the elder Mr. Garcia, a Carvana spokeswoman said, “because they provide the most value in delivering exceptional customer experiences and growing into our opportunity as quickly as possible.”

When Carvana was having trouble meeting customer demand this year, it bought thousands of cars from DriveTime to help catch up. To add buildings for another 1,000 employees at its Phoenix-area corporate campus, Mr. Garcia II bought the land. To help pay for inspection centers getting cars to customers faster, Carvana purchased a building from Mr. Garcia II and sold it for more.

Mr. Garcia II isn’t a Carvana executive or board member but controls around 85% of its voting shares with his CEO son. He has also profited handsomely, selling $3.6 billion of Carvana stock since October 2020.

Publicly traded companies often shun related-party transactions because they raise questions about whether shareholders, or the related parties, are getting the best deal in a transaction. They require additional disclosure under accounting rules and securities law.

Elizabeth Gordon, accounting chair at Temple University who researches related-party transactions and corporate governance, said such deals can be a form of efficient contracting between trusted parties, benefiting shareholders.

“But of course the real concern is, what is your conflict of interest?” she said.

The Carvana spokeswoman said: “At certain companies, there may be concerns with related-party agreements creating risks for investors,” but she said the roughly 20 times increase in Carvana’s stock since its initial public offering has “presumably resolved any potential concerns.”

Carvana’s share price has rocketed through the pandemic. Despite a recent pullback, it is by far the country’s most valuable publicly traded auto retailer. Investors betting on Carvana’s fast growth have sent the company’s market capitalization to nearly double that of rival CarMax, Inc.

“To the extent we find future related-party agreements that benefit our customers and shareholders, we expect to continue utilizing them,” the Carvana spokeswoman said. Payments to Garcia family companies represent less than 1% of the company’s overall expenses, she said.

The younger Mr. Garcia stands to personally benefit from many of the deals.

Public records in Arizona and Texas show Mr. Garcia III is the sole beneficiary of a trust that owns 11.31% of DriveTime and two other companies supplying services to Carvana, Bridgecrest Credit Co. and SilverRock Automotive Inc. With his children, Mr. Garcia III is the beneficiary of a second trust owning another 11.31% of the companies.

Those stakes haven’t previously been reported, and Carvana hasn’t disclosed them. The father, Mr. Garcia II, has sole control of one trust and shares control of the other.

The Carvana spokeswoman didn’t respond to requests for comment about the younger Mr. Garcia’s stakes or why they haven’t been disclosed by the company.

Clay Scheitzach, general counsel for Mr. Garcia II’s DriveTime, said all related-party transactions involving Carvana and DriveTime or its affiliates are fully disclosed and vetted by both sides. He said the companies support Carvana in its mission to disrupt car sales and hope to keep earning its business.

Related-party transactions are cleared by Carvana’s four-person audit committee. The committee only may approve “those transactions that are in or are not inconsistent with our best interests and those of our stockholders,” according to Carvana disclosures.

The audit committee head is Ira Platt, an early investor in Carvana who was on the board at both DriveTime and Bridgecrest before Carvana went public.

A second audit committee member, Greg Sullivan, worked at DriveTime between 1995 and 2007, including as its CEO.

Mr. Platt and Mr. Sullivan didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The father, Mr. Garcia II, had been in the used-car business since the early 1990s. It was a fresh start after pleading guilty in 1990 to a count of bank fraud for taking out a loan and facilitating a real estate transaction that benefited Charles Keating’s Lincoln Savings & Loan Association before it collapsed.

In a 2013 securities filing, Mr. Garcia II said he pleaded guilty after facing severe financial pressure and received a minimal $50 fine due to his cooperation with the investigation.

Carvana was born in 2012 while the younger Mr. Garcia was working as treasurer at DriveTime. He said in a conference interview posted online that he came up with the idea for Carvana while on an assignment to come up with ways to save money. He spent a couple of days at car auctions and said he saw an industry that was the butt of jokes and stuck in the past.

His pitch in Carvana’s April 2017 IPO was for a “refreshingly different and convenient car-buying experience” that eliminated haggling. Customers could pick the car they wanted online, get a loan and schedule delivery in as little as 10 minutes.

Carvana said it could grow quickly in new markets with limited investment compared with bricks-and-mortar dealers. It leased space at DriveTime sites to store and inspect cars, and outsourced resource-intensive collections on customer loans to another company Mr. Garcia II owns.

Some of the deals boosted Garcia family companies. SilverRock, which provides extended warranties that Carvana sells to customers, hit snags renewing an Arizona license in 2018 because it was in negative equity, according to a licensing renewal request to Arizona’s insurance department. It told the department that its financial position was improving from contracts with Carvana and DriveTime, and that it would soon be profitable.

Mr. Scheitzach, DriveTime’s general counsel, said it would be inaccurate to draw conclusions about the overall financial position of the SilverRock group from a filing by one company.

Another Garcia family company, Bridgecrest, saw its loan servicing portfolio more than double to above $10 billion, driven by the Carvana business, according to filings from both companies. It earns between 0.54% and 1.41% in fees for managing loans packaged into public securitizations for Carvana, according to Mr. Scheitzach.

Bridgecrest changed its name from DT Credit Co. after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau imposed an $8 million fine on its parent company and DriveTime in November 2014 for allegedly harassing borrowers. The companies didn’t admit or deny the findings.

Mr. Scheitzach said the name change was unrelated and reflected the expansion of Bridgecrest’s business beyond servicing DriveTime loans.

The related-party agreements are important to Carvana’s earnings. Around 12% of Carvana’s gross profit last year, or $93.6 million, came from commissions for selling SilverRock extended warranties.

“They’re at the edge of the envelope,” said Amy Westbrook, a law professor at Washburn University who has studied large startups. “They have a convoluted tangle of interrelated companies and related party transactions, and it’s very difficult to understand or pull apart.”

The problem with related-party transactions with large shareholders, she said, is “they don’t need to make money from this entity because they own the other entities.” Carvana “doesn’t have to make money for them to make money,” she said.

The Carvana spokeswoman said: “When we believe a related-party agreement provides the most value to Carvana’s customers and shareholders, we pursue it and appropriately disclose it.”

Carvana has grown at breakneck speed and has invested heavily, sacrificing profits to gain market share. It has yet to turn in a full-year profit. One big cost is building a national network of inspection centers to process cars. It has a goal to sell two million vehicles a year.

To make its money go further, Carvana has been buying inspection sites, selling them and leasing them back for 25 years, so-called sale and leasebacks that are a way for growing companies and retailers to raise cash from real estate.

One such deal went through Mr. Garcia II’s real-estate company, Verde Investments Inc.

Verde was leasing an inspection center to Carvana in Tolleson, Ariz. It sold the center to Carvana in September 2020 for $21.7 million net book value, according to Carvana company filings. Carvana immediately sold the center for $50 million to a Phoenix investment firm with an agreement to lease back the property for 25 years. The price included building improvements Carvana made.

In December 2019, Verde bought land around Carvana’s Tempe, Ariz., headquarters outside Phoenix and applied to develop a 14-acre campus. It described Carvana as the future land owner with plans to hire 1,000 employees. Verde got planning permission for the development in August.

In November, Mr. Garcia III told analysts that Carvana was caught short by surging demand for cars this year and needs to catch up. It started buying vehicles directly from DriveTime this year, acquiring roughly $66 million worth of cars from its onetime parent through September, according to company filings.

“We’re going to be working hard to grow the capacity of the business as quickly as we responsibly can,” Mr. Garcia III said.

FT : Russia publishes ‘red line’ security demands for Nato and US

Russia publishes ‘red line’ security demands for Nato and US
Moscow blames alliance for ‘hostile acts’ as tension persists over military build-up near Ukraine

Russia has published a set of stringent demands it is making of the US and Nato, which would end all prospect of Ukraine or other former Soviet states joining the transatlantic alliance and rewrite many of the principles upholding European security since the end of the cold war.

Moscow’s demands go even further than the “red lines” mentioned by President Vladimir Putin, who has said they are needed to insulate Moscow from the threat of attack, and many have previously been ruled out by Nato and its members. Russia’s foreign ministry posted them on its website on Friday after handing them to the US this week.

The US and EU are worried that the proposals could be a prelude to war after Russia deployed about 100,000 troops near its border with Ukraine in recent weeks.

Putin, who denies Moscow plans to invade its neighbour, has blamed the tensions on Nato for supplying Kyiv with advanced weaponry and holding “provocative” exercises near Russia’s borders.

Sergei Ryabkov, a deputy Russian foreign minister, told reporters that Moscow wanted to begin negotiations over its proposals in Geneva as soon as possible.

“US and Nato have aggressively escalated the security situation in recent years, which is absolutely unacceptable and extremely dangerous,” Ryabkov said. “Washington and its Nato allies must immediately end their regular hostile acts against our country.”

US president Joe Biden agreed to discuss Putin’s grievances further in a video call last week but has given no indication that Washington could accept the demands. Ryabkov said Russia was not encouraged by the US’s initial response and called on the White House to take Moscow’s demands seriously.

Under the draft proposals, Nato would have to seek consent from Moscow to deploy troops in former Communist countries in Europe that joined Nato in May 1997.

“Our position is that all these things need to be removed and it’s necessary to return to the 1997 positions,” Ryabkov said.

Nato would have to refrain from “any military activity” in Ukraine, eastern Europe, the southern Caucasus, and central Asia; pledge not to deploy any missiles close enough to hit Russia; and limit exercises to previously agreed numbers in border zones.

A separate treaty with the US would require each side to keep their bombers, naval vessels and missiles out of striking distance of the other party, as well as limiting all their nuclear weapons to their own territory. The US would also pledge not to set up bases in any former Soviet countries or partner with their militaries.

Alliance members have begun discussing potential responses to the proposals, including a mirror list of demands that could be presented to Moscow before any diplomatic talks.

Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg did not rule out discussions on the contents, but said the alliance was “clear that any dialogue with Russia would also need to address Nato’s concerns about Russia’s actions, be based on the core principles and documents of European security and take place in consultation with Nato’s European partners such as Ukraine”.

Nato members want to avoid dismissing the Russian proposals out of hand and giving Putin a propaganda victory, while at the same time making clear that many of the demands — including ruling out Ukraine’s potential membership of the alliance — are unacceptable.

Alliance officials are also aware that without negotiations to defuse tension and reverse Russian troop deployments, Moscow may seek to establish its militarisation of the border as an accepted baseline.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • FRPT -10.9%, RIVN -7.6%, X -4.9% (guides Q4 adjusted EBITDA below consensus), SCS -3.7%, DRI -3.5%

Other news:

  • FUTU -7% (responds to media report; "Futu has been abiding by the same rules and regulations and adopting the similar industry practices")
  • ZME -6.7% (management changes) GM -3.1% (Cruise CEO Dan Ammann to leave the company)
  • JNJ -1.9% (CDC confirms it expressed a clinical preference for individuals to receive an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (PFE BNTX MRNA) over JNJ's COVID-19 vaccine)
  • TSHA -1.6% (initiates clinical development of TSHA-118 for treatment of CLN1 disease)
  • BIIB -1.6% (EMA has recommended the refusal of the marketing authorisation for Aduhelm a medicine intended for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease)
  • DOV -1.5% (announces two acquisitions in clean energy)
  • FB -1.2% (takes action against the surveillance-for-hire industry; says "We alerted around 50000 people who we believe were targeted by these malicious activities worldwide using the system we launched in 2015")

Analyst comments:

  • SBUX -1.6% (downgraded to Neutral from Outperform at Robert W. Baird)
  • CMS -1.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • FDX +5.8% (also authorizes new $5 bln share repurchase program), NX +1.8%, WGO +0.8%

Other news:

  • LYEL +4.5% (FDA clears IND application to initiate Phase 1 trial for LYL797)
  • NXST +2.9% (FOXA and NXST launch NEXTGEN TV broadcasting in Los Angeles)
  • AACI +2.6% (acquires Rezolve Mobile Engagement Platform in $2 bln deal)
  • DYAI +2.5% (has entered into a Research, License and Collaboration Agreement with Janssen Biotech, one of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) )
  • UIHC +1.9% (UIHC to transition its personal lines insurance business in GA, NC, and SC, to HCI)
  • CO +1.8% (rejects non-binding proposal from Alternate Ocean Investment Co)
  • NAAC +1.5% (announces business combination with TeleSign)
  • UPS +1.5% (in sympathy with strong FDX earnings report)
  • EOSE +1.4% (TTI and EOSE sign term sheet regarding supply and collaboration agreement)
  • MRK +1.3% (NEJM publishes positive results from its Phase 3 MOVe-OUT trial)

Analyst comments:

  • SIX +2.7% (upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse)
  • IRTC +2.5% (upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan)
  • IVZ +2.1% (upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets)
  • FXLV +1.7% (upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan)