Barrons : How Europe’s Energy Crisis Could Play Out

How Europe’s Energy Crisis Could Play Out

The energy crunch in Europe escalated into a full-blown crisis this past week after Vladimir Putin cut off the pipeline that supplies a third of the natural gas that Russia sends to Europe. Natural-gas prices soared 30% at one point, and Goldman Sachs analysts projected that Europeans will see their monthly energy bills triple this winter to an average of 500 euros, or almost $500, per family at the peak.

When the worst of it hits, utility bills could account for 15% of European gross domestic product, crowding out other kinds of spending and investment. Goldman warns that the repercussions “will be even deeper than the 1970s oil crisis.”

Europe is now on the verge of recession, if not already in one, and the worst looks yet to come. Graham Secker, Morgan Stanley’s chief European equity strategist, expects an imminent recession in Europe that will pull earnings growth into negative territory next year. Result: Europe’s stocks, already off 14% this year, could well fall another 15%, Secker says.

Plenty of investors have already headed for the doors. Withdrawals from European exchange-traded funds last month hit the highest level since the Brexit panic of 2016, BlackRock reported.

European policy makers, initially slow to respond, have snapped into action, but they have few easy options. The European Central Bank has the near-impossible task of dampening inflation while avoiding a deep recession. The ECB raised interest rates by 0.75 percentage points on Thursday, its largest hike ever, and ECB President Christine Lagarde warned of a “really dark downside scenario.”

Countries are reducing power use, mostly through voluntary measures. Thermostats in Spanish office buildings were turned above 80 degrees last month. The lights that normally illuminate Berlin’s famed Brandenburg Gate have gone dark. European Union energy ministers are considering mandatory electricity limits and caps on Russian energy prices, among other measures.



Hundreds of billions of dollars in government support—potentially exceeding Covid bailouts—will soften the blow of high prices. Germany has already authorized €65 billion to help households, and the United Kingdom capped household gas and electric bills at 2,500 pounds sterling ($2,898) a year for the next two years.

The lifeline being extended to households and small businesses may not save larger firms, however. Many are already reeling.

“If there are any shortages, it’s going to be on the industrial side,” says Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Chicago-based Cresset Capital. While natural gas is used to produce electricity and heat homes, it’s also a key input for industrial plants.

The metals industry is facing a “life or death winter” after electricity and gas costs soared over 10 times last year’s levels, a group of chief executives wrote in a letter asking the European Parliament for emergency aid. The products they make sell for less than the cost of keeping the plant running, they argued. Half of the EU’s zinc and aluminum production has already been halted. “We know from experience that once a plant is closed, it very often becomes a permanent situation.”

Government bailouts are likely to soften the pain, but not eliminate it. “You’re talking about a ballpark of over €1 trillion of extra energy costs for people,” Secker says. “Governments will try to socialize some of that with fiscal support. They’re not going to have the ability to do all of it. The number’s too big.” Politically tricky decisions on rationing energy use could still be ahead.

As the crisis deepens, analyst estimates of corporate earnings could well prove too rosy. Analysts on average expect 17% growth in European earnings this year and 2% next year, Secker says. By comparison, Morgan Stanley sees 12% growth this year and a 10% contraction in 2023.

The MSCI Europe Index990400 +2.38% , which contains companies from 15 countries, is now trading at 11.5 times expected earnings, below its historical average of 13.5. Secker sees that dropping to 10 as stocks flag in coming months.

To understand why the outlook is so bleak, it helps to look at how the European power crisis came to be.

The problems actually began more than a year ago. Natural-gas prices in Europe had already more than quadrupled on a year-over-year basis as of last September. Demand had risen as Covid lockdowns waned, and supplies were slow to catch up. In addition, a cold prior winter had depleted the amount of gas in storage.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February vastly exacerbated the problem, because buying Russian energy meant funding Russia’s war. Oil prices have been volatile since the war began, but the impact on natural gas is a bigger deal. Europe relies on gas for about a quarter of its needs, from heating to electricity to industrial production. In some countries, it makes up much more. Italy, now the “sick man of Europe,” relies on gas for 40% of its energy. Europe needs to import most of its natural gas because it has limited capacity to produce it.

Russia provided Europe with 40% of its natural gas before the war. For years, cheap Russian gas powered the economies of countries such as Germany, which was directly linked to Russian supply via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline that runs under the Baltic Sea. Germany was on the brink of doubling its imports from Russia through a new pipeline called Nord Stream 2 when the war broke out.

The war turned the energy crisis into a political one, too. European sanctions against Russia initially spared most energy sources, but European countries began to transition away from Russia regardless. And Russia accelerated the process, ratcheting down the amount of gas it sent through pipelines. The announcement from Russia’s state-controlled energy giant Gazprom that Nord Stream 1 needed maintenance and wouldn’t come back on is the latest blow; analysts think it’s likely the pipeline stays off through the winter. Europe now gets just 9% of its gas from Russia.

The crisis has been particularly acute because other sources of power have underperformed. Droughts have left rivers at a trickle, reducing hydropower by 26%. And a larger-than-usual number of nuclear plants, particularly in France, have been shut down for maintenance this summer. An increase in solar power has taken up some of the slack, but Europe remains undersupplied heading into the winter.

Russia says that Europe started the economic war by imposing sanctions, and sealed its own fate this winter. “We will not supply gas, oil, coal, heating oil. We will not supply anything,” Putin said at a forum in Vladivostok on Wednesday.

There are some positive developments, though, that should give Europeans hope for the next few months. Natural gas spiked briefly above $100 per million British thermal units on Aug. 26 just ahead of the Nord Stream shutdown—six times recent historical levels—but that price didn’t hold. By shutting off Nord Stream 1, Putin has now played his most powerful card and prices have still retreated to $60.

“In terms of power-price hikes, we’ve probably seen the worst,” says Deepa Venkateswaran, a Bernstein utilities analyst. Months of preparation have paid off. Europe vowed to fill its storage tanks to 80% capacity by the end of October, and has already hit 82%, giving it several months of spare capacity. And record cargoes of American liquefied natural gas have been making their way to Europe to fill the gaps. Venkateswaran expects French nuclear plants to come back on-line in coming weeks. Gavekal Research’s Cedric Gemehl thinks “the shortage is unlikely to prove catastrophic.”

Still, the crisis has upended power markets and put the entire electrical system in jeopardy. An executive at Norwegian utility Equinor says that utilities could be on the hook for as much as €1.5 trillion worth of margin calls, and Finland warned of a “Lehman moment” in power markets. Utilities that sell power to traders and to one another use the futures market to hedge. When prices rise, they face margin calls. Some countries have already announced bailouts. Venkateswaran doesn’t expect those margin calls to be anything like the collapse of Lehman Brothers, however, because it’s driven by a sudden spike in prices, not speculation. “It’s contained within the energy system probably,” she says.

In all, it could take months for the crisis to play out and stocks to settle. Ablin is sitting in cash, waiting for more clarity on interest rates. When the Federal Reserve’s cycle of tightening rates slows down, he expects that the euro will rise against the dollar and open up a buying opportunity in European stocks. At that point, he’ll start buying names that pay stable and growing dividends, like the stocks in the First Trust S&P International Dividend AristocratsFID +2.38% ETF (ticker: FID). Among the European names in that index are financial company Allianz ALV +0.63% (ALIZY) and pharmaceutical giant Novartis NOVN +0.74% (NVS).

“What appeals to me is you’re dealing with very high-quality companies,” he says. “Their balance sheets can withstand a pretty ugly quarter. Management has been dedicated to maintaining and growing their dividend. And, as a result of that, they’re going to do whatever they can to manage their cash flow.”

Barrons : Volkswagen Is One of the Cheapest Stocks. A Porsche IPO Could Change T

Volkswagen Is One of the Cheapest Stocks. A Porsche IPO Could Change That.

With the exception of Tesla , auto makers are out of favor with investors. Their shares carry some of the stock market’s lowest price/earnings multiples. Concerns include an expensive transition to electric vehicles over the next decade, and the sustainability of currently high profitability with a potential recession looming in late 2022 or 2023.

Volkswagen (ticker: VOW3.Germany), the world’s biggest auto maker in annual sales, at $275 billion, is a prime example. Its U.S.-listed preferred shares of Volkswagen (VWAPY)—effectively nonvoting common shares—are down 25% this year to $15, and trade for just four times projected 2022 earnings of $3.50 per share. The shares yield 5% based on VW’s annual dividend, paid earlier this year.

Volkswagen plans to address its low valuation with an initial public offering in late September or early October of a 25% stake in its Porsche division. A successful offering would be a positive catalyst for VW’s stock.

The auto maker’s U.S.-listed common shares (VWAGY) trade for around $19. The preferred and common each are equivalent to 1/10th of a German-listed share.

Porsche could be valued at $60 billion to $85 billion, based on published reports, close to Volkswagen’s current market value of $87 billion. Porsche is the most valuable part of Volkswagen’s impressive automotive portfolio, which includes its mass-market VW brand, premium Audi unit, and ultrahigh-end Bentley and Lamborghini marques.

Porsche is a leading luxury-car maker, producing the 911 and 718 sports cars, the popular Cayenne and Macan sport-utility vehicles, the Panamera sedan, and the all-electric Taycan, introduced in 2019, that competes against Tesla’s (TSLA) Model S. Porsche produces about 300,000 vehicles a year, which sell for an average of close to $100,000 each. It has an enviable 20% operating profit margin.

Porsche generated 25% of Volkswagen’s $13 billion operating profit in the first half of 2022, meaning investors effectively could be paying little for the rest of the company’s earnings. Porsche could be valued at 15 to 20 times net earnings. That’s a discount to high-end luxury-auto maker Ferrari ’s (RACE) 40 times, but well above most auto stocks’ single-digit multiples.


“We see incredible value in VW,” says Lawrence Paustian, an equity research analyst at Pzena Investment Management, which holds VW shares. He says VW is attractive, based on its profits and a sum-of-the-parts analysis, and may be the best-equipped incumbent to take on Tesla.

Morningstar analyst Richard Hilgert is bullish on VW, and both he and Paustian favor the cheaper preferred shares. Hilgert has a price-target equivalent to more than $30 per U.S. share. “If any of the traditional auto makers can catch Tesla, it’s VW,” Hilgert says.

Volkswagen is ahead of rivals in developing electric vehicles and constructing battery plants. It has a strong balance sheet, with $28 billion of net cash at its automotive business.

The stock’s low valuation reflects the industry’s challenge of going all-electric in the next 15 to 20 years. Then, there is VW’s complex corporate and governance structure.

VW expects to be able to produce a million EVs in 2023 and possibly two million by 2025, when Tesla could be selling over four million.

It’s unlikely that the Porsche IPO will be followed by distribution of the remaining 75% stake to shareholders, given the integration of Porsche within VW. That’s a mild negative.

VW is controlled by the Porsche and Piech families, which hold a 50% stake in Porsche Automobil Holding (PAH3.Germany), owner of 53% of VW’s voting shares. Investors can also play VW through the U.S.-listed nonvoting shares (POAHY), recently around $6.

Porsche Automobil trades at an estimated 30% discount to the value of its VW stake, but has billions of dollars of potential legal liabilities related to its aborted VW takeover bid more than a decade ago, and VW’s “dieselgate” scandal that started in 2015. Porsche Automobil plans to buy 12.5% of the Porsche IPO.

Like other big German companies, VW has a supervisory board of 20 members, half elected by shareholders and half by labor. But two of the shareholder representatives are named by the German state of Lower Saxony, where VW is based, and they tend to back labor. Lower Saxony owns 20% of VW’s voting stock. This has made it difficult for VW to cut labor costs, which could be a challenge as the industry shifts to the less labor-intensive manufacturing of EVs.

Still, VW is emerging as a legitimate challenger to Tesla. It has a blue-chip brand, a cheap stock, and now, a possible catalyst to create value.

>>> US After Hours Summary: DOCU +17.9%, ZS +10.6% up big on earnings; ZUMZ -10.4%, AOUT -7%, SWBI -6.6% lower on earnings

After Hours Summary: DOCU +17.9%, ZS +10.6% up big on earnings; ZUMZ -10.4%, AOUT -7%, SWBI -6.6% lower on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: DOCU +17.9%, ZS +10.6%, CXM +2%, RH +1.8%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: CTLP +3.1% (names new CEO, also reports earnings), DHT +2.1% (announces new dividend policy with 100% of net income being paid out as dividends), DDD +2% (forms new, wholly-owned biotech called Systemic Bio), AMPY +0.7% (reaches agreement with California to resolve all criminal matters), KR +0.5% (launches Smart Way, a new product line), CAT +0.5% (reaches settlement with IRS that resolves all issues for 2007-2016, without any penalties), VICI +0.2% (increases dividend), CVX +0.1% (granted an interest in three permits offshore Australia)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: ZUMZ -10.4%, AOUT -7%, SWBI -6.6%, FIZZ -5.3%, AVO -2.9%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: RCM -7.5% (files for 179,754,055 share offering by selling shareholder; announces commencement of 15 mln share offering by selling stockholder), PLCE -1.4% (CFO to step down), HMTV -0.6% (shareholders approve previously announced acquisition bid), NLY -0.5% (approves 1-for-4 reverse stock split), LUV -0.3% (reaches labor deal with mechanics), PZN -0.2% (reports August AUM), TMUS -0.1% (authorizes new $14 bln share repurchase program)

WSJ : Snap CEO Sees Challenges in Executing Turnaround Drive

Snap CEO Sees Challenges in Executing Turnaround Drive
Evan Spiegel says TikTok’s level of investment in acquiring users was a surprise

Snap Inc. SNAP 6.41% Chief Executive Evan Spiegel said he’s bracing for a challenging turnaround period as the company tries to revamp itself and rekindle sales growth at a time when digital advertising spending is under pressure.

“We’ve really got to focus on executing. It’s going to be difficult,” Mr. Spiegel said Wednesday at the Code conference in Beverly Hills, Calif.

Despite the near-term challenges that have caused Snap’s stock to plunge about 85% over the past year, Mr. Spiegel said he remains upbeat about the future of the business he co-founded. “I believe we’re far from reaching our full potential.”

Snap last week disclosed plans to slash 20% of its workforce because of deteriorating market conditions and sales growth that had slowed from more than 40% at the start of the year to around 8% in the current quarter to date. “We don’t see a lot of things that make us optimistic and so what we’ve had to do is really restructure our business,” Mr. Spiegel said at Wednesday’s event.

In addition to announcing it was laying off about 1,200 employees, Snap last week said it would also shut down several projects, including its recently launched flying selfie-camera drone, after posting its slowest sales growth in years in July. The company said it was prepared for a period of low revenue growth that could stretch into next year and that the changes it is making should trim annual costs by about $500 million.

Tech companies more broadly are resetting their plans in the face of an economic slowdown. Google CEO Sundar Pichai on Tuesday said he was aiming to make the Alphabet Inc. company about 20% more productive. Amazon.com Inc. CEO Andy Jassy said the company was slowing the pace of its staff growth.

Snap has been hit particularly hard by disruptions in the digital ad market caused by Apple Inc.’s privacy policy changes, inflationary pressures and a broader economic weakening. As firms have pulled back on their ad spending, Snap has been left fighting for ad dollars against other tech giants such as Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. and Google.

The company said the ad market has rapidly deteriorated. In May, Snap posted a profit warning, telling investors that quarterly revenue would likely come in below projections made just a month earlier. It also said it would slow hiring and spending at the time.

Snap also has said that the competition for the ad spending that remains has become more heated. That partly reflects the strong rise of TikTok, the video-sharing app owned by China’s ByteDance Ltd. that has become a household name in recent years.

Mr. Spiegel suggested that the pace of TikTok’s growth was a surprise. “I think what nobody had anticipated in the United States was the level of investment that ByteDance made into the U.S. market, and of course in Europe, it was just something that was unimaginable,” he said. “No startup could afford to invest billions and billions and billions of dollars in user acquisition like that around the world,” Mr. Spiegel added.

Having so many users deliver content to TikTok enabled the platform to expand and helped improve its algorithm, in part by allowing for highly personalized feeds, Mr. Spiegel said. Replicating that sophistication has been a challenge for the established social-media companies now trying to fend off TikTok, he said.

TikTok didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • Rio Tinto (RIO1 TH) +3.2%
    • Iron Ore Surges to $100 as China City Tackles Unfinished Homes
    • Watch European Oil, Mining Stocks Amid Commodities Rebound
  • GSK (GS71 TH) +1.7%
  • Airbus (AIR TH) +1.6%
  • Orsted (D2G TH) +1.5%
    • European Gas-Price Lull Masks Looming Supply, Demand Uncertainty
  • BNP Paribas (BNP TH) +1.5%
  • Raiffeisen (RAW TH) +1.4%
  • Hermes (HMI TH) +1.3%
  • Siemens Energy (ENR TH) +1.3%
  • Coloplast (CBHD TH) +1.3%
    • Coloplast Offers Rare Buying Opportunity, Berenberg Upgrades
  • Equinor (DNQ TH) +1.2%
  • Prosus (1TY TH) -0.8%
    • Legendary China Bets Unwind as Buffett, SoftBank, Naspers Sell
  • Thyssenkrupp (TKA TH) -1.1%
  • ProSieben (PSM TH) -1.8%
    • Morgan Stanley Stays Defensive in Media, Cuts ProSieben, ITV
  • Atos (AXI TH) -2.3%
    • Atos Cut to Sell at Goldman; PT 8 euros