WSJ : Nissan Presses Partner Renault to Sell Down Its Stake

Nissan Presses Partner Renault to Sell Down Its Stake
Auto makers in talks to restructure partnership as EV becomes bigger focus

Nissan NSANY -1.85% Motor Co. is pressing partner Renault SA RNO 4.91% to sell down a portion of its stake in the Japanese auto maker as part of a grand bargain to reorganize its more than two decade-old alliance with the French car company, according to people with knowledge of the talks.

The negotiations include whether Nissan will join a new unit Renault is creating to house its electric-vehicle assets in exchange for the French car maker winding down its stake in Nissan.

Top executives from Renault and Nissan have been shuttling back and forth between Japan and France to hammer out the details of the deal, which, if agreed, could be announced as early as November, some of the people said.

Nissan executives, including Chief Operating Officer Ashwani Gupta, were in France late last month, when they discussed whether the Japanese car maker would invest in Renault’s new EV business, some of the people said.

Renault is preparing to create two separate divisions within the company to manage a major shift away from fossil-fuel vehicles: one that would focus on EVs and software and another for its traditional combustion engine and hybrid assets, executives have said. Renault plans to hold at least 51% of the new EV entity, with Nissan also owning a stake if it ultimately chooses to participate.

In return for joining Renault’s EV efforts, Nissan is making a number of demands, according to the people close to the talks. One is for Renault to sell down at least part of its 43% stake in the Japanese car maker, a longtime goal for Nissan, these people said.

Renault Chief Executive Luca de Meo is in Japan this weekend to carry on those discussions and attend the Japanese Grand Prix 2022, according to people familiar with his travel schedule.

The Financial Times reported some details of the discussions Friday.

If Nissan decides to join with Renault, the two auto makers will effectively be taking their alliance—a globe-spanning partnership that has been under pressure since the 2018 arrest of longtime leader Carlos Ghosn —into the EV age.

For Nissan, even a partial sale of Renault’s stake in the Japanese car maker would be a critical step in quelling some longstanding tension within the alliance.

The Japanese car maker has chafed at what it saw as an uneven relationship, where the smaller French partner held outsize influence in the partnership by virtue of owning a controlling 43% stake in Nissan. Renault executives, meanwhile, have felt that they aren’t getting enough of a return on their stake in Nissan, and that the funds would be better spent elsewhere if they could get some of their money back.

Renault isn’t opposed to the idea of selling down its stake in Nissan but wants to make sure any agreement is binding and long-lasting, and that it gets a fair return on the sale of Nissan’s shares, said some of the people close to the negotiations. One option under discussion is for Renault to sell Nissan shares if and when they reach certain price points, these people said. Nissan shares have more than halved in value since 2018.

Across the auto industry, executives are trying to decide on how to restructure operations that have long been built around the internal combustion engine for developing EVs, a technology that requires vastly different resources and hefty investment.

German auto-making giant Volkswagen AG last month took its luxury sports-car maker Porsche AG public, a move executives have said will help the company bankroll its transition to electric vehicles and self-driving cars.

Earlier this year, Ford Motor Co. also revamped operations internally to create separate divisions, including one that would be focused solely on electric vehicles and another on gas-engine models. Others like rival General Motors Co. have opted to keep the two businesses combined, a configuration that executives say is necessary because the fossil-fuel side of the business still drives the bulk of the profits.

In creating the new EV division, Renault wants to ensure that it has the wherewithal to invest in future technologies by raising capital from outside investors. Internally, the two new divisions at Renault are known by code names “Ampère” for the EV side and “Horse” for the gas-engine business. Executives have said they plan to take the new EV division public next year.

Mr. De Meo plans to update the market on his strategy at an event on Nov. 8, although there is no guarantee that Nissan would have made a decision about whether to join Renault’s EV unit by that date.

For now, Nissan is debating whether to collaborate with Renault on the spinoff of its EV unit, according to the people close to the talks. By participating in Renault’s EV unit, Nissan would avoid putting further strain on its relationship with the Japanese auto maker’s top shareholder and show the two are collaborating more deeply in EV development, these people said.

Renault’s new EV company could also boost the relatively small amount of revenue Nissan brings in from Europe and help it maintain its footing as EV sales become more competitive in the region, some of the people said.

At the same time, some executives at Nissan believe the company should focus investment on its bigger markets including the U.S. and Japan, as well as China, where sales have slipped in recent years, these people said.

The auto makers are also trying to sort through jointly developed intellectual property and how that would be transferred to the new business, the people familiar with the talks said.

FT : UK and France to take joint control of Sizewell C nuclear plant

UK and France to take joint control of Sizewell C nuclear plant
Negotiations mark new rapprochement between Truss and Macron in the wake of Prague meeting

Britain and France are negotiating to take joint control of a new nuclear power station project in the UK, with an agreement expected within the next two weeks.

The deal over the ownership of the Sizewell C plant in Suffolk, east England, is among the first fruits of a rapprochement between the two countries after years of discord in the wake of Brexit.

UK prime minister Liz Truss met French president Emmanuel Macron in Prague at the inaugural meeting of a new grouping of European states, the European Political Community, on Thursday, where they agreed to press ahead with the project that is vital to Britain’s future electricity supply.

The 3.2-gigawatt Sizewell C plant is expected to be capable of producing electricity for around six million British homes.

Since the UK left the EU in 2020, a series of squalls have hit the relationship. London and Paris have squabbled over migrants crossing the Channel, border queues, French fishing boats and British sewage entering the North Sea.

But on Thursday both leaders agreed to increase their co-operation over energy, migration and convened the first Anglo-French summit for five years to take place in 2023.

Macron welcomed a “new phase of our common relations” at the meeting. The personal relationship between him and Boris Johnson was also often tense with the French leader regarding the former prime minister as an unreliable partner.

The UK and French state-controlled energy group EDF are each expected to take a 50 per cent share in the company developing Sizewell C as part of a move that is also designed to remove Chinese nuclear group CGN from the deal, according to people briefed on the plan.

The UK and French governments would both shoulder development costs, which run into the hundreds of millions of pounds, under the terms of the agreement, but would then be free to sell their stakes to new investors.

The UK is hoping to persuade external investors such as infrastructure and pension funds to provide the additional equity and debt to fund the construction of the plant — which EDF estimated will cost £20bn in 2015 prices — to improve energy security following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

A final investment decision on Sizewell is due in late 2023, after which point EDF would own no more than 20 per cent of the project if construction plans go ahead, the people added.

Britain and France have also been in intense discussions over how to keep power flowing between the two countries this winter, even as Paris struggles with outages at its fleet of nuclear reactors.

One senior Downing Street figure said: “There is a genuine desire to work closely together on the big issues facing Europe and the world. Energy and migration in particular are the areas where both agree collective action and greater co-operation is needed.”

Macron and Truss’s joint statement said they would hold a broader meeting on illegal migration in the so-called Calais format, which includes UK, France, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.

One British official said there “there will be something in weeks rather than months” on combating the illegal trade in migrants.

Negotiations over the annual UK funding for France for border security had been in a deadlock. Under the last agreement, signed in 2021, the UK sent about €60mn to France in exchange for specific policing and control measures along the border but ministers have complained France has not done enough to stop small boat crossings.

FT : US warns Hong Kong over oligarch’s superyacht docked in its waters

US warns Hong Kong over oligarch’s superyacht docked in its waters
Chinese territory will ignore ‘unilateral’ sanctions against boat’s Russian owner Alexei Mordashov


The US has warned that Hong Kong risked becoming a haven for Russian oligarchs after the Chinese territory said it would not enforce western sanctions on a superyacht owned by billionaire Alexei Mordashov that has docked in the city’s waters.

The US state department also said Hong Kong’s business outlook could be further clouded by its government’s inaction as the former British colony’s “reputation as a financial centre depends on adherence to international laws and standards”.

The saga unfolded as the 142-metre Nord, one of the world’s most luxurious superyachts built by German company Lürssen, entered Hong Kong waters on Wednesday. The $500mn vessel has been moored west of the city’s Victoria Harbour.

The yacht, which sails under the Russian flag, left Vladivostok last week, according to Marine Traffic, a tracking website. Nord was described by the studio that designed it as “a warship wearing a tuxedo” as it boasts two helipads, a pool and a fleet of tenders.

Mordashov, one of Russia’s richest men, made his fortune through the steel group Severstal. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the US, EU and UK imposed sanctions on Mordashov and other oligarchs.

“Certain countries may impose unilateral sanctions against certain places on the basis of their own considerations,” a spokesperson for the city’s marine department said on Friday.

“The Hong Kong [government] does not implement, nor do we have the legal authority to take action on, unilateral sanctions imposed by other jurisdictions.”

The US said the statement by the Hong Kong department might encourage oligarchs who are subject to sanctions to live in the city. “The possible use of Hong Kong as a safe haven by individuals evading sanctions from multiple jurisdictions further calls into question the transparency of the business environment,” a US state department spokesperson told the Financial Times.

Lodestone, a Hong Kong-based yacht brokerage that provides support services to superyachts, is listed as the agent for the Nord in Hong Kong. An employee confirmed the listing.

Ryan Mitchell, an assistant professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong with a focus on international law, said it would “raise risks considerably if Hong Kong became widely seen as a popular destination for the assets of sanctioned Russian corporations or individuals”.

“Hong Kong-based corporations or individuals should be aware that they could later face secondary sanctions if they enter into business transactions or relationships with Russian sanction targets,” he added.

Maintenance, insurance and other financial services provided to the yacht could involve institutions that operate in more than one state. This could “give the option to the sanctioning states to intervene with these transactions not directly in Hong Kong but along the chain of payments”, said Michael Tsimplis, a law professor from the City University of Hong Kong.

A visiting pleasure yacht is not allowed to stay in Hong Kong waters for more than 182 consecutive days unless it is properly licensed with local authorities, according to the marine department.

FT : Climate graphic of the week: EU payments for Russian fuel since war reach b

Climate graphic of the week: EU payments for Russian fuel since war reach beyond €100bn
Emissions continue to rise as overall fossil fuel consumption increases during energy crisis


EU countries have imported more than €100bn worth of coal, oil and gas from Russia since the invasion of Ukraine in February, as part of the bloc’s higher overall consumption of fossil fuels so far in 2022, an independent Helsinki-based research group has estimated.

While Europe continued to pay as much to Russia for gas as it did in the first half of 2021 due to skyrocketing prices, it received a fraction of the gas, said the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (Crea).

But the bloc’s estimated overall 11 per cent drop in total gas consumption in the first half of the year was counterbalanced by an increase in the use of oil products by 8 per cent, hard coal by 7 per cent, and lignite by 12 per cent, based on data from the Eurostat government agency.

As a result, EU carbon dioxide emissions were likely to have increased by about 2 per cent in the first half of the year, Crea estimated.

Globally, there was a rise in coal and gas generation in July and August as record drought and heatwaves pushed up electricity demand, the think-tank Ember reported recently.

“We can’t be sure if we’ve reached peak coal and gas in the power sector. Global power sector emissions are still pushing all-time highs when they need to be falling very quickly. And the same fossil fuels pushing us into a climate crisis are also causing the global energy crisis.” said Małgorzata Wiatros-Motyka, Senior Electricity Analyst at Ember.

The EU remains the largest importer of fossil fuels from Russia even though overall volumes have halved since the start of the invasion.

The €100bn milestone highlights how Moscow has continued to draw revenue from the same nations seeking to isolate it. While EU gas imports decreased significantly, and coal imports have now ceased since sanctions came into force in August, Crea estimates the EU still imports around €260mn worth of Russian fossil fuels per day.

“While capping prices and limiting imports from Russia, it’s essential for European countries to accelerate the shift from fossil fuels to clean energy. This year has revealed the reliance on fossil fuels as a fundamental national security and economic vulnerability,” said Crea lead analyst Lauri Myllyvirta.

Indian and Chinese oil buying has also offset most of the fall in Russian shipments to Europe, a recent Financial Times analysis of available data shows, with the biggest volume growth coming from India.


Egypt, which relies on grain shipments from Russia and Ukraine, had also emerged as a significant buyer, Crea reported. This runs counter to its status as host country for the next UN climate change summit.

It was the next biggest fossil fuel importer since the invasion behind the EU, China, Turkey, India, South Korea and Japan.

Egyptian imports of oil peaked in July, up from almost zero before the invasion, Crea said. Similar to India, Russian oil exported to Egypt was often re-exported elsewhere, it added.

In mid-September, the European Commission published new guidance that the transfer of certain goods, including coal, from Russia to third countries “should be allowed to combat food and energy insecurity around the world.”


A ban on EU imports of Russian coal began on August 10, following a wind-down period of four months. However, Crea notes that EU member states failed to enforce a provision in the ban that prohibited EU-owned ships from transporting coal from Russia to third countries.

But Russia’s coal exports have regained about half of the loss of the EU market, with Turkey and India taking more coal. India imported almost no fossil fuel from Russia before the invasion.

>>> US Close Dow -2,11% S&P -2,80% Nasdaq -3,80% Russell -2,87% VIX 31,36 +2,65%


Closing Stock Market Summary

It was a rough session for the stock market on the heels of the September Employment Report. A broad sell off was precipitated by a jobs report that reflected continued strength in the labor market, stoking concerns about continued aggressive rate hikes from the Fed. 

Despite today's heavy sell off, the stock market was able to hold onto gains from the big rally on Monday and Tuesday. The S&P 500 was up 1.5% for the week; the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 2.0% for the week; the Nasdaq Composite was up 0.7% for the week.

The market was led lower today by weak mega cap stocks. The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) closed down 3.8% versus a 2.8% loss in the S&P 500 and a 2.4% loss in the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). 

Semiconductor stocks were another drag on index performance today. The PHLX Semiconductor Index closed with a 6.1% loss after Advanced Micro Devices (AMD 58.44, -9.41, -13.9%) slashed its revenue and gross margin guidance for Q3, citing a "significantly" weaker PC market.

The weak showing from semiconductor stocks contributed to the underperformance of the S&P 500 information technology sector (-4.1%), which closed in last place for the 11 sectors. The info tech sector was able to squeeze out a gain of 1.6% on the week. 

The energy sector (-0.7%) spent most of the session in positive territory and closed with the slimmest loss as oil prices surged. WTI crude oil futures rose 4.5% on the day to $92.47/bbl. The sector also logged the biggest gains on the week, up 13.9%.

Decliner led advancers by a greater than 5-to-1 margin at the NYSE and a nearly 4-to-1 margin at the Nasdaq.

Rising Treasury yields were a headwind for equities today. The 2-yr note yield rose seven basis points on the day, and ten on the week, to 4.30%. The 10-yr note yield rose six basis points on the day, and eight on the week, to 3.88%.

There is no U.S. economic data of note on Monday.

Reviewing today's economic data:

  • September Nonfarm payrolls increased by 263,000 (250,000) following an unrevised 315,000 increase in August
  • September Nonfarm private payrolls increased by 288,000 ( consensus 275,000) following a revised 308,000 increase in August (from 308,000)
  • September Average hourly earnings increased by 0.3% (consensus 0.3%) following a 0.3% increase in August
  • September Unemployment rate was 3.5% in September (consensus 3.7%) following a 3.7% rate in August
  • September Average workweek totaled 34.5 hours in September (consensus 34.5) following the same number in August
    • Today's release of the Employment Situation report for September reflected continued growth in headline employment and monthly average hourly earnings, giving the Fed room to continue its aggressive rate hike campaign.
  • August Wholesale Inventories were up 1.3% following a 0.6% increase in July

Dow Jones Industrial Average: -19.4% YTD
S&P Midcap 400: -20.2% YTD
S&P 500: -23.6% YTD
Russell 2000: -24.2% YTD
Nasdaq Composite: -31.9% YTD

>>> Weekly Market Update

Weekly Market Update: Hopes for a turnaround fade as economic data remains too strong to alter monetary tightening track

After the dismal close last week markets were set up for a bounce when trading commenced on Monday. Highly oversold short-term conditions and key stabilization in government bond yields appeared to be the main catalysts. September ISM manufacturing data was weaker than expected and prices paid fell to the lowest levels since June 2020, which was very well received by the markets. On Tuesday, rates continued to roll away from cycle highs and the relief rally found further legs after the Reserve Bank of Australia raised rates less than markets were expecting. Also softening economic readings continued, such as the JOLTS job openings in the lead up to Friday’s September employment report. Finally worries about a UK financial crisis receded further after PM Truss retracted plans to cut the top tax bracket in the UK. By mid-week the BOE had drastically reduced GILT purchases via its temporary APF.

After US stock markets experienced the biggest two-day gains in more than two years, volatility resurfaced on Wednesday. US economic data was largely stronger than expected with the ISM Services Index holding up notably well, offsetting some of the softer readings seen this week that had stoked hopes the Fed could be nearing a data-induced pause. The OPEC+ decision to cut production by 2M bpd complicated matters, adding to the risk that resurgent oil prices will keep inflation higher for longer. Fed officials appeared to be on high alert to squelch any pivot narrative, picking up their hawkish rhetoric noticeably into the September employment report.

Unfortunately for investors who may have positioned for a weaker employment report, Friday’s jobs data offered few, if any, signs of slack in the labor market. Workforce growth was moderate at best and while wage growth moderated, it remained strong. Employers added 263K workers in September which is still well above the monthly gains of around 50K that many economists think would keep the unemployment rate from falling. To that end, the unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 3.5%, an optic that makes it hard for investors to get behind any narrative calling for a near term pause in rate hikes. Treasury yields rose across the curve and risk assets came under broad pressure, led by significant giveback in the gains made in US stock markets early in week. With traders likely to quickly turn their attention to next week’s September CPI print, the sharp rise in WTI crude back above $92/bbl may rekindled worries of inflation staying higher for longer. Futures markets saw the odds of a 75bps hike at the November FOMC meeting rise slightly to above 80%. For the week, the S&P rose 1.5%, the DJIA gained 2%, and the Nasdaq was up 0.7%.

In corporate news this week, Credit Suisse was reportedly planning to accelerate its efforts to strengthen its finances following speculation over the weekend about potential liquidity issues at the bank. FedEx shares were volatile on Friday on a report that its ground division expects to lower volume forecasts as customers are expecting to ship fewer holiday packages. Tesla shares were hit early in the week after the EV manufacturer reported a miss on its Q3 deliveries, pointing to China demand concerns and increasing challenges in securing transportation capacity for vehicle deliveries. Tesla shares also may have suffered from speculation that Elon Musk may have to sell shares to fund the acquisition of Twitter after the world’s wealthiest man proposed to proceed with the original buyout price with the stipulation that ongoing acquisition dispute litigation was halted. Twitter balked at the proposal as a legal maneuver, and the Delaware judge overseeing the case agreed to delay the trial by two weeks to allow the parties to agree to terms. The semiconductor sector sank on Friday after the White House confirmed new restrictions on sales of chip technology to China, and also due to AMD cutting its Q3 revenue outlook amid weak PC demand and a significant inventory correction across the computing supply chain. Media reports indicated the US government is considering easing sanctions against Venezuela which could allow Chevron to produce oil there in return for new talks between government and opposition leadership.


SUN 10/2
(UK) PM Truss: I do accept we should have laid the ground better, but I do stand by the fiscal package we announced; I will not publish OBR forecasts early, want to work with OBR
OPEC+ said to consider production cut of more than 1Mbpd on Oct 5th; To hold in-person meeting (first since early 2020) - press
(AU) ABC Australia correspondent David Taylor tweets: Credible source tells me a major international investment bank is on the brink
(IT) Gas supplies from Russia to Italy through only entry point completely halted from Oct 1st until regulatory issues in Austria resolved - press
(US) Congress reauthorizes FDA user fee agreements
TSLA Reports Q3 deliveries 343K v 360Ke v 254.7K q/q; Q3 production 365K v 258.6K q/q; Notes it began transitioning to a more even regional mix of vehicle builds each week; It is increasingly challenging to secure vehicle transportation capacity
CSGN.CH Bank of England (BOE) 'monitors' co. amid market turbulence - UK Telegraph [update]
MON 10/3
(EU) EU ambassadors to meet later on Oct 3rd to discuss the 8th package of sanctions against Russia; One diplomat notes there will be no sanctions package without Russian oil price cap - Politico
(UK) Chancellor of the Exchequer (Fin Min) Kwarteng: Confirms not going ahead with 45% tax rate move; There will be no tax cuts ahead of budget on Nov 23rd
CSGN.CH Extends losses to 7% following last week's CEO memo to staff saying Credit Suisse is at critical moment
*(IT) ITALY SEPT MANUFACTURING PMI: 48.3 V 47.5E (3rd straight contraction)
(CH) Swiss weekly Total Sight Deposits (CHF): 669.6B v 747.1B prior
(US) Supreme Court takes case related to social media company liability under Section 130
*(US) SEPT FINAL S&P/MARKIT MANUFACTURING PMI: 52.0 V 51.8E
*(US) SEPT ISM MANUFACTURING: 50.9 V 52.0E (lowest since May 2020); PRICES PAID: 51.7 V 51.8E (lowest since June 2020)
(UK) Chancellor of the Exchequer (Fin Min) Kwarteng: It's been tough but we need to move forward; We need to focus on job at hand with no more distractions
(US) Atlanta Fed GDPNow: Cuts Q3 GDP to 2.3% from 2.4%
(KR) Japan notes that North Korea has appeared to have test fired a missile eastward; Issues warning to seek shelter from missile
POSH Naver to purchase co. at $17.90/shr in all cash deal; enterprise value ~$1.2B
005930.KR To present plans on chip foundry at event; Aiming for 2nm mass production by 2025 and 1.4nm by 2027
(JP) Japan Defense Min Hamada: Missile Launch from North Korea likely longest ever at 4.6K km, Decided to not deploy missile destruction after determining there was no danger to Japan
*(AU) RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA (RBA) RAISES CASH RATE TARGET BY 25 BPS TO 2.60%; LESS-THAN-EXPECTED
TUES 10/4
(UK) PM Truss: Rules out any more mini-budget u-turns; Absolutely determined to press ahead with this growth plan; No decision made on raising benefits yet; Govt focused on helping more people get into work
2317.TW Reports Sept (NT$) Rev 822.3B +40.4% y/y; Notes Q3 Rev better than expected
*(US) AUG JOLTS JOB OPENINGS: 10.05M V 11.09ME (first reading below 11M since Nov 2021, and lowest since May 2021)
(NZ) Fonterra Global Dairy Trade Auction Dairy Trade price index: -3.5% v +2.0% prior
OPEC+ reportedly considering cut to quota of as much as 2.0M b/d - press
TWTR Tesla CEO Musk reportedly proposes in letter to Twitter to proceed with deal at $54.20/shr - press
WEDS 10/5
TSM Follow Up: Said to be negotiating lower prices with suppliers, talks said to focus on price decreases of at least 10% - Digitimes
TSCO.UK CEO: Seeing more frequent shops, smaller basket sizes and less shopping online - post earnings comments
(CN) Reportedly Chinese diplomats in latest conversations with EU counterparts made clear that the use of nuclear weapons by Russia would be viewed as totally unacceptable in Beijing - press
*(US) SEPT ADP EMPLOYMENT CHANGE: +208K V +200KE; Notes annual pay growth for job changers in Sept is down m/m
*OPEC+ JMMC TECHNICAL PANEL SAID TO AGREE ON OIL PRODUCTION CUT OF 2M BPD (biggest cut since 2020) - press
*(US) SEPT FINAL S&P/MARKIT SERVICES PMI: 49.3 V 49.2E
*(US) SEPT ISM SERVICES INDEX: 56.7 V 56.0E
(US) Atlanta Fed GDPNow: Raises Q3 GDP to 2.7% from 2.3%
(US) Association of American Railroads weekly rail traffic report for week ending Oct 1st: 496K total units, -3.9% y/y
(US) September preliminary NA Class 8 Net Orders 56.5K, +169% m/m; Largest net orders ever - FTRintel.com
COST Reports Sept total SSS +8.6% (ex-gas and FX) v +6.3%e
CVX (VZ) Reportedly US is prepared to ease Venezuela sanctions to allow Chevron to produce oil there - press
(VZ) US NSA Official: Venezuela sanctions policy unchanged
THURS 10/6
DGE.UK AGM trading update: Expect operating environment to remain challenging
(EU) EU formally approves 8th package of Russia sanctions; Confirms the beginning of the implementation within the EU of the G7 agreement on Russian oil price cap; Confirms ~€7B worth of additional import restrictions, including steel products, chemicals, machinery and appliances
VNTR Reports Prelim Q3 TiO volumes -25% q/q
(US) Sept Challenger Job Cuts: +30.0K v +20.5K prior; Y/Y: 67.6% v 30.3% prior; Sep planned hires lowest since 2011
(RU) LME confirms discussion paper with options that include an immediate ban on new Russian metal
AMD Cuts Q3 Rev $5.6B v $6.68Be (prior $6.5-6.9B); Macroeconomic conditions drove lower than expected PC demand, significant inventory correction across the PC supply chain
(EU) EU ACEA: Cuts 2022 vehicle sales forecast to -1.0% from +7.9% seen in Feb
*(US) FED'S MESTER (FOMC VOTER): FED WILL NOT CUT RATES AT ALL IN 2023
005930.KR Reports prelim Q3 (KRW) Op 10.8T v 15.8T y/y (12.1Te), Rev 76.0T v 74.0T y/y (78.5Te)
(JP) Japan Sept FX Reserves: $1.24T v $1.29T prior (Largest m/m fall; at lowest amount since Dec 2015)
(JP) Japan Fin Min Suzuki: FX reserves fell most on record in Sept; FX intervention was a factor in fall in reserves
*(US) US Pres Biden: Putin's nuclear threat biggest risk since Cuban Missile Crisis; Warns Putin is 'not joking' about nuclear threat; Warns of 'Armageddon' if nuclear weapons used
FRI 10/7
(RU) According to US intelligence, a member of Russia Pres Putin’s inner circle has voiced disagreement directly to the Russian Pres in recent weeks over his handling of the war in Ukraine - WaPo
CSGN.CH Announces public tender for senior debt securities for up to CHF3B
TSM Reports Sept (NT$) Rev 208.3B, +36% y/y, -4.5% m/m; YTD Rev 1.64T +43% y/y
066570.KR Reports prelim Q3 (KRW) Op 746.6B v 596.8B y/y (v 952.8Be); Rev 21.2T v 18.6T y/y (v 20.1Te)
(EU) ECB said have told some banks recently that it expects pay and dividend restraint; ECB concerned about potential wave of defaults on banks - press
*(US) SEPT CHANGE IN NONFARM PAYROLLS: +263K V +255KE
*(US) SEPT AVERAGE HOURLY EARNINGS M/M: 0.3% V 0.3%E; Y/Y: 5.0% V 5.0%E
*(US) SEPT UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 3.5% V 3.7%E (matched the lowest since Feb 2020); Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.3% v 62.4%e
*(CA) CANADA SEPT NET CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT: +21.1K V +20.0KE; UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 5.2% V 5.4%E
Sep Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index: -3.0% M/M; -0.1% Y/Y; Values saw larger-than-normal declines
FDX Internal memo shows FedEx ground division expects to lower volume forecast as customers expecting to ship fewer holiday packages – press
(US) Atlanta Fed GDPNow: Raises Q3 GDP to 2.9% from 2.7%
(US) AUG CONSUMER CREDIT: $32.2B V $25.0BE

FT : Zuckerberg’s metaverse rush pauses for ‘quality lockdown’

Zuckerberg’s metaverse rush pauses for ‘quality lockdown’
Meta has yet to demonstrate that its $10bn a year bet on an immersive virtual world will be a success

In early September, Mark Zuckerberg rushed to a Meta lab in Pittsburgh, sat before more than 100 high-resolution cameras and prepared to prove his metaverse critics wrong.

The photo shoot was designed to generate a more realistic avatar in the Meta chief executive’s likeness, as the social media giant scrambled to demonstrate that its $10bn a year bet on a futuristic 3D digital world known as the metaverse was not a flop.

In the weeks before, the Facebook founder had faced public ridicule after an earlier cartoon-like avatar selfie went viral for all the wrong reasons.

That rudimentary image was widely derided as “cringe” and “soulless”, piling pressure on Zuckerberg to prove he had not wildly misjudged staking his company’s future on a metaverse vision that had already racked up more than $27bn in operating losses over the past three years.

But the selfie episode is just one hurdle facing Zuckerberg, who believes the metaverse is the next natural evolution in online socialising and is expected to unveil the new avatar as soon as next week.

According to memos and conversations with 10 current and former employees, his 3bn user-strong social media empire is experiencing disruption and challenges as part of the pivot to Meta, and has already been forced to delay future launches and adjust expectations.

In a September memo seen by the Financial Times, Vishal Shah, the vice-president of Meta’s metaverse arm, warned that users and creators had complained that Horizon Worlds — its social virtual reality experience and the closest thing it has to a metaverse so far — was low quality and full of bugs.

He ordered a “quality lockdown” for the rest of the year, telling staff that they need to improve fundamentals before any aggressive expansion. Staffers working on the product had to “reprioritise or slow some things we had planned”, said Shah, adding that he was lowering its user numbers target for the second half of the year.


Mark Zuckerberg faced ridicule for his rudimentary avatar selfie for the metaverse, which was described as ‘cringe’ and ‘soulless’
Some employees warned morale was suffering as teams got restructured to accommodate Zuckerberg’s new vision, which many have not yet bought into. “There are a lot of people internally who have never put on a [virtual reality] headset,” said one metaverse employee.

Meta said in a statement the company was “confident that the metaverse is the future of computing and that it should be built around people”. It added: “Of course we are always making quality improvements and acting on the feedback from our community of creators. This is a multiyear journey, and we’re going to keep making what we build better.”

Into the metaverse
It has been almost a year since Zuckerberg announced his Meta pivot. His plan was eventually to attract 1bn users and “hundreds of billions of dollars of digital commerce a day”, a move that would take between five and 10 years, he said.

Zuckerberg declared that from now on “we’re going to be metaverse first, not Facebook first”, relegating the social media network he founded in 2004 — and brings in the vast majority of its $118bn annual revenue today — to secondary status. Reality Labs, the division dedicated to the metaverse, would see a doubling of its workforce to 20,000 engineers.

Meta currently has more than 83,000 staff after rapidly expanding during the pandemic, and has poached augmented and virtual reality engineering talent from rivals Microsoft and Apple as it looks to beef up its metaverse team.

But the push into the metaverse comes as the group’s market valuation has plummeted from $1tn to less than $400bn over the past 14 months. The company faces several headwinds: a slump in digital advertising revenue, slowing user growth on its Facebook platform and rising competition from deep-pocketed, China-owned rival TikTok.

Last week, Zuckerberg announced a hiring freeze across most teams and belt tightening into 2023 given the tough macroeconomic backdrop. Staffers have also been ordered by Zuckerberg to work with “increased intensity” and a “sense of urgency”, according to a July memo.


Analysts and employees said the coming years would determine whether its metaverse shift was the answer to these problems — new lines of revenue to capture the next generation of internet users, or a giant distraction sucking away resources and limiting the company’s ability to revive its legacy product and rebuild its ad infrastructure.

“The challenge is that they’re so metaverse focused that they’re not investing in the core product that is Facebook and Instagram. All of this is a side show from the real issue which is that Meta continues to get its clock cleaned by TikTok,” said Rich Greenfield, analyst at LightShed Partners.

He added that the level of Meta’s investment in the metaverse was “worrisome” to investors. “The metaverse as Meta envisions it is not investable today. Nobody is buying Meta for the metaverse”.

Big investments
Since the beginning of 2019, more than $27bn has been reported in operating losses for Reality Labs, Meta’s metaverse and virtual reality division.

According to people familiar with the situation, investments have been focused broadly on developing the hardware, such as virtual and augmented reality headsets, that can be used to log into the metaverse, alongside software for its 3D world and the underlying infrastructure needed to support the system.

As well as the avatars that will represent users in the metaverse, the company has been working on activities beyond simple socialising to give them something to do, from working out in virtual fitness programmes to playing games and even venues for education.

At its last results in July, the company said it had $24bn worth of non-cancellable contractual commitments “primarily related to our investments in servers, network infrastructure, and consumer hardware products in Reality Labs”.

Meanwhile, revenues from the division, coming largely from VR headset sales, remain meagre, partly down to the fact the entire VR industry has developed slower than anticipated. In the second quarter, Reality Labs accounted for $452mn out of $28bn in total revenues, and the company warned that it expected Reality Labs revenue in the coming quarter to be even lower.

“It’s a huge gamble,” said one advertising executive. “If you get the timeline wrong [too early] by 10 years then the company is really in jeopardy given how capital intensive this is.”

The recent restructuring and ditching of various projects in order to prioritise the metaverse has knocked morale, according to multiple current and former staffers, with some reporting an unhelpful division between the staff focused on the metaverse and those in the legacy part of the business.

Devon Copley, chief executive of Avatour, a virtual meeting company, said Meta was “leading the industry” when it came to developing the hardware.

However he warned the company was challenged more in developing software for the metaverse.

“The problem is the fragmented nature of the different software product teams and initiatives within the Meta org,” he said, citing the constant reorganisations, “frequent changes of direction” and lack of a “coherent vision” for a social network that incorporates virtual and augmented reality.

Already, the company is struggling to impress creators who develop social experiences in the metaverse. According to a Meta memo shared by one person on their Facebook profile, creators complained at a roundtable last month that Horizon Worlds was “unstable and unreliable” and that Meta staff did not give them updates when they reported bugs, or ahead of launches.

Employees “don’t communicate well or it could be understaffing and things falling through the cracks”, said one metaverse employee.

In Shah’s memo, which was first reported by the Verge, the Meta executive said the Horizon Worlds team had intentionally pivoted to “shipping faster” but that this had led staffers to “trade off quality for the sake of speed”. 

Bugs and stability issues were so bad, Shah noted, that Meta’s own employees were not even using the product.

He added: “The simple truth is, if we don’t love it, how can we expect our users to love it?”

FT : Renault chief flies to Japan for crunch talks over Nissan alliance

Renault chief flies to Japan for crunch talks over Nissan alliance
Negotiations will aim to resolve intellectual property dispute and examine future of French group’s stake

Renault chief executive Luca de Meo has jetted into Tokyo for a weekend of talks with Nissan boss Makoto Uchida aimed at breaking a deadlock over intellectual property and potentially paving the way for a historic restructuring of the carmakers’ alliance.

De Meo’s visit centres on two proposals aimed at securing Renault’s future but which, crucially, require Nissan’s agreement, according to people close to both sides.

The alliance between Renault and Nissan, which was first struck in 1999, has held together despite tensions. But as the global car industry shifts inexorably towards electric vehicles, the pressure on both carmakers to make it work better is building.

The first proposal is the French group’s ambition to offload part of its combustion engine business to China’s Geely, the people said. The plan is part of Renault’s long-term ambition to only sell electric vehicles but, given the historic sharing of technology with Nissan, requires the latter’s consent.

People familiar with the matter said Renault’s plan would most likely be to fold its combustion unit, called “Horse”, into Geely’s Aurobay business that the Chinese carmaker co-owns with Volvo.

It is a step that has drawn strong resistance from Nissan, which does not want technology that it jointly developed with Renault over many years shared with a Chinese company, the people added.

De Meo wants a deal with Geely finalised before the French carmaker’s capital markets day in early November.

The second proposal under discussion this weekend is Renault’s request that Nissan invest in a new “electric vehicle and software” unit that the French carmaker aims to eventually list as a separate company called “Ampere”.

While resolving the dispute over intellectual property is a key aim of the talks, Nissan will use it as a chance to call for a significant reduction of the 43 per cent stake that Renault holds in the company — long a source of tension.

Although historically opposed to such a change, Renault’s opposition has eased as it instead seeks to strengthen co-operation with Nissan on operational projects, according to two people.

Renault executives have argued that the alliance with Nissan will live or die on its ability to forge ahead with joint production plans, opening the door in recent months to potential changes in the ownership structure, the people said.

“There have been discussions about all of this. The important thing now is to persevere with what underpins the alliance, the capital structure in itself is a bit irrelevant,” one of the people added.

As the two companies wrestle with the alliance, their chief rivals are forging closer ties. Stellantis, formed by the merger of Peugeot owner PSA and Italy’s Fiat-Chrysler, is now one of the world’s most valuable carmakers, while Honda and General Motors are co-operating closely on battery technology.

Renault, Nissan and Geely all declined to comment. The French state owns 15 per cent of Renault, and will have sway over any changes to the carmaker’s holding in Nissan. The French economy ministry declined to comment.

FT : Evan Spiegel: Snap’s ad slowdown does not blur vision of augmented reality

Evan Spiegel: Snap’s ad slowdown does not blur vision of augmented reality
Chief executive of social media messaging group sees Spectacles technology as chance for diversification

Despite being one of the smaller social media networks — with around 350mn daily active users — Snap’s messaging services proved so popular during Covid lockdowns that its revenues increased rapidly. By early 2021, chief executive Evan Spiegel was forecasting multiple years of at least 50 per cent annual revenue growth, even without any rise in user or engagement numbers.

But this year’s spike in inflation, and slowing global economy, has hit the company hard. In August, Speigel announced a radical restructuring of Snap, including a 20 per cent reduction of its 6,500-strong workforce and cuts to investment in the augmented reality (AR) technology that had been central to its future strategy. Its share price rallied a little on news of the shake up, but is still down 80 per cent in the past 12 months

Here, the FT’s tech correspondent, Hannah Murphy, asks Spiegel how the economic downturn is affecting Snap’s advertising business model and push into AR hardware and software.

Hannah Murphy: After a pandemic boom, the advertising market now looks pretty bleak. Do you think this marks some sort of turning point or significant moment for advertising?

Evan Spiegel: It’s definitely a turning point, although it’s not just for advertising. It’s definitely more broadly in the economy. We’re seeing persistent and high inflation, and the determination of central banks to reduce the rate of inflation by dramatically, and very rapidly, increasing interest rates, which is having a massive ripple effect through the entire economy. So, advertising is, in many ways, like a proxy for the global economy. It cuts across so many different industries. And as a result, of course, we’re feeling the same challenges that all of our advertising partners are feeling.


Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

HM: Do you think social media groups or businesses that rely on advertising got too excited during the pandemic? Was there not enough caution?

ES: I think the technology industry is always optimistic. And, usually, over the long term, technology tends to have these transformative impacts. Certainly, technology businesses benefited tremendously from the transition online, whether that was ecommerce or people video chatting more, or — of course — using Snapchat to stay in touch with their friends and family. And some of that is very sticky, and some of it is returning to some more normalised growth levels.

But it hasn’t changed the long-term trajectory here: the way that technology is transforming the way that we live and relate to one another. The exceptional and unusual piece of this was really monetary policy, then technological advancement, which, over the last 10 years, has been massively transformative — with mobile technology and, looking into the future, things like augmented reality.

HM: Are there lessons learned from this latest slowdown? What would you change, with hindsight, in order to protect yourselves from future downturns like this? That over-reliance on ad revenue?

ES: It would certainly help to have a more diversified business in terms of revenue, which is why we’re working on things like our subscription product with Snapchat Plus, which is something that we’re very excited about. But I think the very rapid deceleration in our advertising revenue, is, in some ways, a feature of our customers. They have a lot of flexibility and control over their advertising spend.

So, as the economy started to slow down, people could very easily and quickly adjust their plans. That’s one of the reasons why businesses really value digital advertising. Of course, it’s very measurable, you have enormous reach. But also you have flexibility that is sometimes difficult when you’re buying advertising in other mediums.

That was obviously very challenging through this period of time. As we look to the future, hopefully we begin to see a recovery, [and] digital advertising also playing an important role in that — because people can very easily turn it back on as well.

HM: I’ve been referring to you as a social media company, but you’ve described [the business] as a camera company. I’m assuming that’s still applicable today. Can you talk a bit about what that means, exactly?


Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

ES: Absolutely. Snap is a camera company. And we make Snapchat, which is a visual messaging app. And one of the reasons why we talk so much about cameras is because of the way it’s transforming how we live and communicate. In the beginning, Snapchat’s core insight was that visual communication was alive; a lot more fun; a lot more fast and more convenient than text messaging and certainly way more expressive.

So Snapchat gave people a way to stay in touch that strengthened their relationships in a way that was very different, you know, when compared to text messaging or email or something like that. It could get people to that same level of convenience of text messaging, being able to communicate quickly.

[Then] as we looked over time, we saw that there were more opportunities for the camera. Not just to change the way that people communicate, but also the way that people express themselves with augmented reality, and learn about the world through AR platforms and associated tools. As we look towards the future, we believe that the camera is going to play an increasingly important role. So, when we talk about being a camera company, it’s really because we believe in the power of the camera to transform the world.

HM: Tell me a bit more about your vision for augmented reality. How does Snap, specifically, fit into that?

ES: When I first started working on augmented reality, we just wanted to empower people to express themselves. So, in the early days of Snapchat, people were sending selfies back and forth and communicating using our camera. AR really lowered the bar because it gave people new creative tools. You could use a lens that gave you dog ears or something like that, and send that to friends and make them laugh and have fun together.

Then, over time, we took those tools that we were using to build augmented reality lenses, and we made them available to our entire community so that developers could build their own AR lenses. Now, there are hundreds of thousands of developers or 250 million people that are engaged with AR every day, on Snapchat. Millions of lenses have been created. And that really started expanding what was possible with augmented reality.

That got us very excited about the long-term potential for AR and so there’s this great opportunity over the next decade or so, for smartphone augmented reality, which is the primary way people are going to use AR for the foreseeable future.

But longer term, we’ve also been evolving our platform, so that it will transition to things like wearable technology, where you can put on augmented reality glasses and overlay computing on the world around you. This has really been a step-by-step journey together with our community who’s using AR every day in their lives. And then, of course, our developer community as well. We’re building all sorts of amazing new AR experiences.

HM: If we think this immersive, wearable AR is the next computing platform, what’s the day to day [experience]? Is it someone with a headset, walking around and having things beamed into their eye? What does that look like?

ES: In computing, shifts have happened and unlocked totally new behaviours, If you think about the way that desktop computing evolved, that really made the internet accessible: you didn’t have to walk to the library or go visit a mainframe computer; you could sit at home and access the world’s information on your desktop. Over time, of course, we saw that transition to mobile computing, and mobile computing gave you access to your friends everywhere all over the world through communication. So smartphones really transformed the way that we communicate and Snapchat has benefited tremendously from that shift.

As we look towards the future, we believe that computing is going to be experiential, and that will be powered by things like AR glasses. It’s just because that makes computing much more immersive . . . For example, we have this very cool lens you can use to learn how to play the piano: you can sit in front of your piano and put on the glasses and it’ll light up the keys, and help you learn how to play. That’s a really exciting new way to play the piano that’s fully experiential, because you’re actually pressing the keys yourself.

And we know from research that experiential learning is a much faster way to learn than reading a book about playing the piano, or reading sheet music, or maybe even watching a video. So we really believe that augmented reality is going to be an important part of the way that people learn and interact with one another.

HM: On the AR glasses side of things. How far out is that? What’s the timeframe? You mentioned a decade, but it feels like we’ve been hearing that for quite some years now.

We’re going to have to miniaturise that technology and find ways to make it more efficient and evolve an AR platform, so people can make more immersive experiences. So it will take a long time before there’s broad adoption throughout the world

ES: The things that I mentioned are already available today on [Snap’s] Spectacles. We’ve been working on AR glasses for about eight years now. They started as camera glasses, first with one camera, then with two cameras so we could better understand the world in three dimensions, now with the display on the latest generation. So, lots of these experiences are already available today on [Snap] Spectacles, which is part of what’s so exciting.

Over time, of course, we’re going to have to miniaturise that technology and find ways to make it more efficient and evolve an AR platform, so people can make more immersive experiences. So it will take a long time before there’s broad adoption throughout the world in the same way that there’s adoption of smartphones today. But what’s so exciting is that the software platform already exists today, and the hardware is available in the form of Spectacles.

HM: Along with rival platforms, you’ve been hit by tough macro economic conditions — the slowdown — and you’ve had to announce a bit of restructuring. As part of that, you said you were narrowing the scope of your investment in Spectacles. What does that mean, exactly?

ES: It means our efforts are going to be much more focused on the fundamental research and development that’s required to make really compelling consumer AR glasses and less focused on scaling up the production of those glasses, where a lot of the cost is. So, as we talk about broad-based consumer adoption being further into the future, that’s consistent with how we’re investing. We’ll be much more focused on fundamental technology, and improvements to our AR developer platform, but not necessarily scaling the production of AR glasses to millions of people. That’s something that could happen far into the future, but not in the near term.

HM: So, essentially, waiting longer to put out something to consumers?

ES: Maybe waiting longer to put something out at a broad-based scale. So, instead of focusing on the developer community, continuing to evolve the software platform, and investing in fundamental R&D.

HM: Rather than putting out semi-finished versions along the way, waiting until you have one that you’re very, very ready to ship?

ES: We will continue to put out new versions of our glasses, it’s really a question of the scale: how many of those glasses do we make; and how do we distribute them? We won’t make a very large volume of them, or distribute a large volume of them, until we’re a bit further along. But, in the meantime, we’ve actually found it’s been quite effective to continue to create new versions of our glasses, because then developers can use them to build all these experiences.

Today, often with new hardware products, there’s a ‘chicken and egg’ problem — because you buy a new piece of hardware, but there aren’t all the interesting software experiences. And there aren’t the AR experiences that you might want to use with the glasses. So we believe this partnership, where we’re giving new versions of our glasses to developers to play with, helps us build lens experiences that people can use on Spectacles, but also on their smartphones, today.

HM: How else have you narrowed your scope, as part of the sort of recent restructuring. Have, you had to rethink your approach due to any unforeseen technological issues?

ES: We’re always iterating. And evolving. A huge part of the innovation process is trying to learn as quickly as you possibly can. What’s so exciting about innovating on AR at Snapchat is the breadth of engagement with AR on our platform today.

And, as we package up our AR technology and camera kit, and provide that to partners, we’ve also been able to unlock new use cases. I don’t know, if you’ve had a chance to check out the Vogue runway app. It’s pretty fun: you can try on the latest looks fresh off the runway, directly in their application. That’s been a really fun partnership for us.

HM: Do you envisage yourself licensing some of your AR software to other companies and to their headsets?

ES: That’s a great question. We certainly architected our software to be able to do that. But that’s a pretty big strategic decision. And we haven’t made the decision to distribute our AR platform to anyone else’s AR glasses yet. But that’s certainly something we might consider and [it] would be aligned with our strategy so far, which is to take our AR technology, and provide it to partners to run in their own applications. So it’s something we certainly have thought about. But we haven’t made the decision to do that yet.

HM: Do you have an idea of what advertising will look like in this long-term vision of yours, which includes AR glasses?

ES: The important thing with advertising is that it always follows engagement. So the key to building a big advertising business is really innovating so that people love using your product and engage with it a lot. If you can do that, then there are plenty of ways to monetise using advertising.

We have an advertising business today inside of Snapchat . . . so we’ll continue to think about new ways to evolve advertising for augmented reality. But we haven’t thought particularly about how that might work. Like the glasses experience, we’re really focused on doing that inside of Snapchat, because — as I mentioned — advertising really has to follow engagement. And 250 million people are engaging with AR everyday on Snapchat, which makes it a good fit for advertising. Our efforts with glasses are still quite nascent.

HM: Who do you consider your rivals in this space? I know I named Meta, Google and Apple, but I don’t know if there are others.

ES: That’s a good start! I’m sure there’ll be more. Since we started building Snapchat, we’ve always had very large competitors. If you think about it, whether it’s Facebook or Instagram, or Twitter or WhatsApp, all of these companies existed before Snapchat did so we were used to an environment with big, well-funded competitors. We’ll continue to just focus on our community which has been our strategy since the very beginning.

If we can make stuff that people really want to use and have fun using with their friends, I think we can be successful over the long term — and none of those companies have to lose in order for us to win. That’s also an important part of the competitive dynamic.

HM: Speaking of competitors, [Meta CEO] Mark Zuckerberg has his vision of an avatar-filled metaverse where we’ll all one day log in, via VR or AR. So AR or VR is the gateway into this world, and headsets and wearables are presumably part of that. Do you agree with that vision?

ES: We’re very focused on augmented reality, because it’s grounded in the real world. And we think people are gonna want to spend most of their time in the real world with their real friends. AR can be a fun way to share activities and experiences together in the real world. That fulfilment that people get from actually being together is something we really want to support.

People are going to want to use things like avatars . . . [they] have created over a billion Bitmoji, an avatar that we work on here at Snapchat. People love trying out new fashion, There was a great new drop of Jordans that were limited edition, for your Bitmoji, that was really popular in the last week or two. People are gonna want to play with things like virtual fashion and express themselves using avatars. But I would say our focus is primarily on augmented reality. For the reasons I mentioned.

HM: Do you think that there will one day be a big space where billions of people log in to socialise, work and meet, either using AR or VR — this idea of an avatar filled metaverse?

ES: Oh, goodness, probably a bit too early to say. But I’ll certainly be following the developments.

HM: Snap was ahead of Mark [Zuckerberg]’s vision with Bitmoji avatars. They’ve been around for years. So do you already think there’s some form of a future metaverse you would want to be a part of?

ES: We’re still trying to figure out what the metaverse is over here. But again, I think what’s more important is to really focus on delivering value for our community. That’s why AR is so exciting. It’s not something that we have to wait for. It’s something that already exists today, that people are using on their smartphones — hundreds of millions of people are engaging with it, developers are building for it.

HM: What are the biggest challenges to this AR vision of yours?

ES: Augmented reality has always taken long-term focus and execution. And that’s critically important. I think Snap is now at a scale where we can invest over the long term. When we were in my Dad’s house, we were just trying to survive until tomorrow. But, today, you know, we’ve got a really talented team that has such a great vision for the future. We’ve got hundreds of millions of people around the world who love using Snapchat every single day. So, between our community and our team and our ability to invest for the long term, hopefully we can overcome whatever the world decides to throw at us. It’s been a pretty interesting past couple of years.

HM: Among the potential challenges, there’s obviously the technological, and the regulatory, and then consumer demand — winning people over to this way of life. I don’t know which of the three is more challenging.

ES: We’re constantly thinking about how to improve our products for our community. Just trying to keep that focus on really building products that people love: that’s what gives you the inspiration to overcome the technological challenges and drive towards a great product experience.

HM: And I have to ask: why did you kill off Pixy — the little flying selfie drone — only a couple of weeks after it was launched? I actually have one!

ES: It’s such a fun product and obviously there was a great reception. But, unfortunately, it is also a low-margin product. So it is not built for this brave new world!

HM: The other big challenger — more to your existing platform rather than AR — is TikTok. You cater to a similar demographic. How much of a threat are they? How can you protect yourself against TikTok eating your lunch?

ES: The most important thing is to focus on the core value that we provide to our community, which is visual messaging. That’s what’s given our business the resilience to navigate tonnes of competitive challenges over the years — whether that’s Facebook and Instagram or YouTube.

There are always going to be new places for people to watch compelling content. Content is a very, very competitive business. So what’s very important is that we have this durable way that people get value from our service by talking to their friends and family. Of course, over time, we’ve taken that communication use case and then diversified it. So people use our AR platform, they use our map to see what their friends are up to. They want stories from their friends, they also watch spotlight content, which highlights some of the most engaging content created by our community.

So, while we’re going to continue to compete with them, when it comes to our content business, the reason people come to Snapchat every day is visual messaging. And that has proven, over time, to be really resilient because — no matter what — people love talking to their friends and their family.