>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • ASTL -5.7%
Other news:
  • FFIE -10.3% (to Announce FX Business Strategy Update and New Product Details on January 8, 2025 in Las Vegas)
  • PNTG -8.1% (names new chairman)
  • X -7.4% (President Biden will announce decision to block Nippon Steel acquisition of US Steel (X) today)
  • CVNA -3.9% (calls short allegations misleading and inaccurate, according to NY Post)
  • LAES -2.3% (filed prospectus supplement to the Registration Statement with the Commission on January 2)
  • NNBR -2.2% (announces new asset-based lending facility)
  • NEWT -1.7% ( discloses it completed the previously announced sale of its wholly owned subsidiary Newtek Technology Solutions to Paltalk (PALT))
  • BJRI -1.6% (enters into cooperation agreement with activist investor)
  • ITGR -0.9% (announces conversion period for convertible notes)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • LFCR +5.3%, RGP +3.2%
Other news:
  • NUS +13.4% (completes strategic transaction of Mavely for $250 mln)
  • SLRN +10.9% (to Host Virtual Investor Event to Share new Phase 2 Data and Phase 3 Program Design for Subcutaneous Lonigutamab)
  • ETON +4.1% (advances its commitment to rare disease with the acquisition of Galzin)
  • PINE +3.7% (acquires property leased to Lowe's; also updates Q4 activity)
  • MRC +3.5% (authorizes $125 mln share repurchase program)
  • UDR +2.7% (names new COO; to name new CFO)
  • THS +2.2% (completes acquisition of Harris Tea; reiterates FY24 guidance)
  • DCBO +2% (CFO to step down)
  • OZK +2% (increases dividend)
  • WGS +1.7% (names new COO)
  • DKL +1.6% (announces closing of Gravity Water Midstream Acquisition)
  • GGAL +1.5% (ADS offering by selling shareholder)
  • DTI +1.5% (stock offering by selling shareholders)
  • RCKT +1.4% (extended the expiration date of the existing Master Repurchase Agreement)
  • BTBT +1.3% (is required to file periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as of Jan 1)
  • COR +1% (completes Retina Consultants acquisition, raises FY25 EPS guidance to reflect addition)
  • CNH +1% (positive Barron's article)

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 3rd of January 2025 V3(++)

>>> Up
* Argenx ADRs PT Raised to $775 from $665 at Guggenheim (++)
* Boyd Gaming Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT $92
* Carlyle Group Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $60
* Delek US Holdings Raised to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Devon Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $45
* JPMorgan Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $269
* Knorr-Bremse Raised to Hold at Hauck & Aufhaeuser; PT 65 euros (+)
* Matador Resources Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $72
* Phillips 66 Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $143
* Robert Half Inc Raised to Equal-Weight at Barclays
* Shell ADRs Raised to Outperform at Wolfe
* Steel Dynamics Raised to Outperform at BNPP Exane (+)
* Tesla PT Raised to $404 from $298 at Canaccord (+)
* UBS Raised to Outperform at BNPP Exane (+)

>>> Down
* BNY Mellon Cut to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Commercial Metals Cut to Neutral at BNPP Exane (+)
* Dermapharm Cut to Hold at mwb research AG (++)
* Imperial Oil Cut to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Lazard Inc Cut to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Nexstim Cut to Reduce at Inderes; PT 7 euros (++)
* Outokumpu Cut to Underperform at BNPP Exane (+)
* Sinch PT Cut to 38.30 kronor from 55 kronor at JPMorgan
* Voestalpine Cut to Neutral at BNPP Exane (+)

>>> Initiation
* Vaisala Rated New Buy at SEB Equities; PT 56 euros

>>> Call
* BofA Stock Indicator Is Notch Away From Flashing a ‘Sell’ Signal
* Boyd Gaming, Las Vegas Sands Raised at Jefferies; Red Rock Cut
* Morgan Stanley’s Shalett Sees Big Tech’s Reign in Peril in 2025
* Outokumpu Gets Sole Sell-Equivalent as BNP Flags Steel Headwinds (++)
* UBS Raised to Outperform at BNPP Exane on Buyback Potential (+)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
  • Gapping up:
    • SLRN +13%, NUS +12.8%, LFCR +7.4%, RDZN +4.4%, PINE +3.7%, WGS +3%, MRC +3%, UDR +2.7%, DCBO +2%, OZK +2%, GGAL +1.7%, DTI +1.5%, RCKT +1.4%, AVAV +1.3%, KTOS +1%
  • Gapping down:
    • PNTG -8.1%, FFIE -7.6%, ASTL -6.5%, CVNA -3.5%, LAES -3%, NNBR -2.2%, NEWT -1.7%, BJRI -1.6%, THS -1.1%, ITGR -0.9%, AVA -0.8%

WSJ : The Mystery of What’s Causing Young People’s Cancer Leads to the Gut

The Mystery of What’s Causing Young People’s Cancer Leads to the Gut
Obesity and alcohol consumption are first priorities for cancer researchers

Researchers have identified a focal point for the forces they suspect of driving up cancer cases in young people: the gut. They are searching people’s bodies and childhood histories for culprits.

Rates of gastrointestinal cancers among people under 50 are increasing across the globe. In the U.S., colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men under 50 and second for women behind breast cancer. Each generation born since the 1950s has had higher risk than the one before.

“Everything you can think of that has been introduced in our society since really the 1960s, the post-World War II era, is a potential culprit,” said Dr. Marios Giannakis, a gastrointestinal oncologist at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for Health and Human Services secretary, has pointed to ultra-processed foods and chemicals in medicines and the environment. Cancer doctors share some of his suspicions about diet and exposure to contaminants such as microplastics, shards that make their way from packaging or clothing into our bodies through water and food. They are scrutinizing those and other potential hazards including “forever chemicals” and even light.

“We’re all concerned and want to do something quickly and act quickly, but we want to do so based on sound science,” said Dr. Andrew Chan, director of epidemiology at Mass General Cancer Center in Boston.

His team has found connections between early-onset colorectal cancer risk and obesity, consuming a lot of sugar-sweetened beverages and physical inactivity. But those studies don’t prove a direct cause.

Chan’s team is expanding its work to incorporate studies that track more people and analyze blood, tumor and stool samples. They will scour the results for potential carcinogens, then expose mice to them and see if cancers develop.

They plan to first focus on obesity and alcohol, said Yin Cao, a cancer epidemiologist from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, who co-leads the work with Chan. Excessive alcohol use is linked with risk for early colorectal cancer, studies show, along with diets high in fat and added sugars. One study found people who ate more ultra-processed foods had a greater risk of precursors to colon cancer.

The group plans to test ways to lower risks, including whether prescribing weight-loss drugs including Ozempic can help prevent colorectal cancer. Another trial will assign some participants a healthier diet and study whether changes in the bacteria and pathogens in the gut, called the microbiome, affect their risk.

“There’s an interplay most likely between the things we eat, the bacteria in the gut, and what those bacteria produce,” said Dr. Jordan Kharofa, a gastrointestinal-cancer specialist at the University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, who isn’t involved in the study.

Kharofa and other researchers have uncovered links to diets high in sulfur, which results from consuming lots of liquor and processed meat and few fruits and vegetables. Gut bacteria can turn that sulfur into hydrogen sulfide, which could inflame the colon and raise cancer risk.

But some patients don’t fit that description at all.

“They are very, very health conscious, and then they come into your clinic and they’re 33 and they’ve got stage-four colon cancer,” said Dr. Marwan Fakih, a gastrointestinal oncologist at City of Hope in Duarte, Calif. “There’s no question we’re missing something.”

Some researchers are looking at antibiotics, which disrupt the microbiome. One California team analyzed medical records and failed to find a solid link to broad-spectrum antibiotics, but the early results suggest long-term use could increase risk.

At the University of California, Irvine, cancer biologist Selma Masri has shown in mice that changing the body’s internal clock, called the circadian rhythm, changes the diversity and abundance of gut bacteria. Some of the changes were linked to reduced levels of mucus that protects the gut lining from harmful bacteria.

She also found a link between disrupting the circadian clock and colorectal cancer. Masri and some other scientists think near-constant light from cellphones, laptops and other devices could throw off internal clocks and promote cancer growth by tampering with the immune system, metabolism and the microbiome.

“The amount of light pollution that’s gone up has been staggering,” Masri said.

Other researchers used drinking water to expose mice to a chemical called PFOS, used to make products resistant to stains and oil and part of the family of “forever chemicals” known as PFAS. They found changes in mice’s intestinal tissue that could increase their risk of developing colorectal cancer.

“We don’t have all the answers yet,” said Jane Figueiredo, a professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. “There might not be a magic bullet.”

WSJ : From M&A to AI, How CFOs Are Mapping Out the Year Ahead

From M&A to AI, How CFOs Are Mapping Out the Year Ahead
Corporate leaders are searching for greater efficiencies and implementing acquisition plans heading into 2025

Corporate chiefs spent much of the year concerned about inflation and the U.S. election and generally focused on how to wring more operational efficiencies out of their organizations. While 2025 brings more clarity ahead on many fronts, one constant remains: managing change.

Inflation will still be a focus in the year ahead, as consumers continue to watch their grocery bills, and companies weigh the potential inflationary effects of tariffs and their impact on trading partners including Canada, Mexico and China.

2025 will be a watershed year for artificial intelligence, as companies integrate generative AI into their workflows to a greater degree, including in investor relations departments and earnings preparation.

And with the new Trump administration set to take office, expectations for lower interest rates, measures to curb inflation and a pullback in regulatory scrutiny also have some chief financial officers adjusting their game plans and gearing up for “animal spirits” to provide a tailwind for M&A activity in the coming year.

The Wall Street Journal interviewed some top finance chiefs and analysts about their expectations and plans for the year ahead. These are the main themes CFOs are focusing on:

Leveraging AI
Investments in AI will continue to be a theme, said Don McGuire, the chief financial officer at payroll, HR and tax services company ADP. The company already has embedded various AI tools in its sales processes to help with call preparation, prospect prioritization and coaching, McGuire said.

For sales reps, AI tools can “whisper in their ears,” he said. “Things that people used to sit beside you and have a headset, now you can do those things with GenAI tools, and that helps you navigate.”

ADP also uses GenAI to prepare for investor days by going over the topics that dozens of clients will talk about and to outline key themes.

“The big difference with GenAI is you can literally go through tens of millions of interactions and really get deep summarization on what’s happening,” McGuire said.

“So it’s back to doing more with the same, or doing more with less.”

Adapting to tariffs
The threat of tariffs can be expected to ripple through business operations, affecting supply-chain costs and investment priorities, according to Michael Perica, CFO of Rimini Street, an enterprise-software provider.

Key considerations for CFOs will include how to adapt various financial strategies to support supply-chain disruptions. Companies also will need to allocate resources to absorb potential tariff expenses or redirect investments into partnerships with local suppliers to have greater flexibility, Perica said.

In some cases, business projects will be cut as a result of higher tariffs, he forecast.

“We are having conversations as [clients are] prepping for this and what feels like an inevitability, and we are absolutely partnering with folks to help them along and take a look and evaluate what’s a ‘nice-to-have’ project versus ‘got to have,’ ” he said.

Interest rates and the U.S. economy
While equities have surged since the election, the bond market has sold off, said Adam Barsky, the CFO at the New York Power Authority. So the Treasury yield curve is getting steeper, meaning that the cost of debt in the 7-10 year range of the curve has gone higher.

“Higher inflation expectations as well as higher federal debt and deficits are bearish for the bond market while there is uncertainty,” Barsky said. “Once we see what ultimately happens with tariffs, there will be a reset.”

On the U.S. economy, ADP’s McGuire said he sees continued tailwinds helping in terms of growth and the U.S. labor market.

“The U.S. economy does continue to be strong. Unemployment rates and employment participation rates are almost at where they were prepandemic. Things like new business formations, they came back, in the month of September. They continue to be at elevated levels from a historical perspective. The U.S. economy’s pretty resilient and will continue to be so for quite some time,” he said.

M&A
Dealmaking has already been picking up, with a steady rise in the volume of deals valued at over $1 billion during the past year, but even more seems likely in 2025 as the Trump administration reconsiders regulatory efforts.

“Between an incoming change administration and a different economic environment, from an industry perspective, you’re going to see that that kind of momentum will continue to 2025,” said David Dean, managing director for M&A consulting at consulting firm WTW.

Specific sectors to watch include life sciences, financial services and insurance, Dean said. GenAI also will have a role in M&A activity, according to Dean. “One dimension is companies that are trying to buy AI capabilities in one form or fashion,” he noted. Companies also will increasingly use AI to analyze and weigh potential deals, he said.

Whether M&A picks up in 2025 will depend on how much the Federal Reserve cuts rates, however, and exactly which regulatory changes Trump brings, according to Suzanne Kumar, an executive vice president in the global M&A and divestitures practice at consulting giant Bain & Co.

Deal activity in the venture-capital and private-equity sectors will also be a factor, she said. “We still have the sense that the market is idling, and we’re waiting for something to unlock momentum,” Kumar said.

Many buyers and sellers remain at odds when it comes to agreeing on a valuation. Higher rates have made financing more expensive than it was several years ago, and have lowered the projected enterprise value of potential targets. Meanwhile, stock-market valuations have risen over the past year, giving sellers confidence to ask for higher prices.

“What is happening is, if sellers have the option to wait, they are,” Kumar said.

>>> Fannie Mae: Treasury Department and Federal Housing Finance Agency amend pre

Fannie Mae: Treasury Department and Federal Housing Finance Agency amend preferred stock purchase agreements for Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac

"Further information on the key changes in the letter agreements and side letter is provided below:

Restoration of Consent Rights: As amended, the PSPAs restore Treasury's right to consent to a release of the GSEs from conservatorship, consistent with the terms of the PSPAs from 2008 to 2021, and provide Treasury with a right to consent to any discretionary action by the FHFA to commence a receivership of the GSEs.
Commitment to Conduct a Market Impact Assessment: As reflected in the side letter from FHFA to Treasury, prior to releasing the GSEs from conservatorship (except through receivership), FHFA will issue a public request for information outlining in detail one or more specific options for the termination of conservatorship and seek input on potential impacts of each option on the housing market and on the GSEs. This process will increase transparency to the public and key stakeholders and will help inform FHFA's and Treasury's decision making. FHFA will brief the Financial Stability Oversight Council on the public input, including regarding factors that could have potential impacts on U.S. financial stability. FHFA will then provide Treasury with a recommended approach to the termination of the conservatorship, reflecting the public input and assessing potential impacts on the housing market and the GSEs. Treasury will consult with the President prior to consenting to a release of the GSEs from conservatorship.
Technical Updates: The letter agreement updates several provisions of the PSPAs to make corrections or reflect existing practices, including making technical updates to the definitions of "Indebtedness" and "Mortgage Assets"; eliminating certain business-activity restrictions from the PSPAs that have been suspended since September 14, 2021; updating references to the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework to refer to that framework as amended from time to time; and updating notice provisions to allow for electronic communications between the parties."

FT : Joe Biden expected to block $15bn takeover of US Steel President set to ki

Joe Biden expected to block $15bn takeover of US Steel

President set to kill Nippon Steel’s bid in one of his final acts in office

President Joe Biden is expected to block a $15bn deal by Japan’s Nippon Steel to buy US Steel, ending months of frantic lobbying and delivering a setback to Washington’s relationship with its closest Asia-Pacific ally.

In one of his final actions in government, Biden — long opposed to the takeover — is expected to announce as soon as Friday his decision to kill the proposed acquisition of the iconic American steelmaker, according to two people familiar with the matter.

One of those people said the White House had yet to notify Nippon Steel about the decision.

The president’s expected move comes after an inter-agency investment screening review, known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (Cfius), failed to reach consensus by a December 23 deadline on whether the acquisition posed a national security threat.

Two people close to the situation said Nippon Steel was likely to take legal action against the outgoing president’s ruling.

One person said such an action could, during the discovery process, reveal the extent to which the decision had been led by politics rather than national security concerns. The process would also expose the limitations of the Cfius process and its vulnerability to political interests.

Nippon Steel declined to comment.

President-elect Donald Trump had also threatened to quash the deal and vowed to protect the Pittsburgh-based company through a mix of tariffs and tax incentives.

The year-long saga’s conclusion marks the failure of an audacious gambit by the Japanese group that soon morphed into a sensitive political issue in an election year. It also represents a significant departure from the US’s long-standing open investment environment.

Biden’s decision risks undercutting four years of work to reassure allies such as Japan of their special relationship with the US amid strategic competition with China and a shift towards protectionism, support for trade unions and an “America first” sentiment in US politics.

US and Japanese government officials fear broader ramifications for investment and M&A by Japan and other partners in America and implications for the solidity of the US-Japan alliance.

Takahiro Mori, vice-president at Nippon Steel, spearheaded last-ditch efforts by the Japanese steelmaker to win over government officials and union members in Washington and Pennsylvania.

Those efforts included a new proposal this week that offered the government a veto over any reductions in steelmaking capacity at the majority of Nippon Steel’s plants in the US, adding to an array of other assurances on jobs and investment.

The gesture followed concerns from Cfius that US Steel could lower domestic steel production under Japanese ownership, affecting industries of national importance.

However, those moves were of little avail, even as some of Biden’s senior advisers tried to talk him out of obstructing the deal.

Its death marks a victory for Katherine Tai, the US trade representative, and David McCall, president of the United Steelworkers union, who were the deal’s two staunchest opponents.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 3rd of January 2025 V2(+)

>>> Up
* Boyd Gaming Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT $92
* Carlyle Group Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $60
* Delek US Holdings Raised to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Devon Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $45
* JPMorgan Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $269
* Knorr-Bremse Raised to Hold at Hauck & Aufhaeuser; PT 65 euros (+)
* Matador Resources Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $72
* Phillips 66 Raised to Outperform at Wolfe; PT $143
* Robert Half Inc Raised to Equal-Weight at Barclays
* Shell ADRs Raised to Outperform at Wolfe
* Steel Dynamics Raised to Outperform at BNPP Exane (+)
* Tesla PT Raised to $404 from $298 at Canaccord (+)
* UBS Raised to Outperform at BNPP Exane (+)

>>> Down
* BNY Mellon Cut to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Commercial Metals Cut to Neutral at BNPP Exane (+)
* Imperial Oil Cut to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Lazard Inc Cut to Peerperform at Wolfe
* Outokumpu Cut to Underperform at BNPP Exane (+)
* Sinch PT Cut to 38.30 kronor from 55 kronor at JPMorgan
* Voestalpine Cut to Neutral at BNPP Exane (+)

>>> Initiation
* Vaisala Rated New Buy at SEB Equities; PT 56 euros

>>> Call
* BofA Stock Indicator Is Notch Away From Flashing a ‘Sell’ Signal
* Boyd Gaming, Las Vegas Sands Raised at Jefferies; Red Rock Cut
* Morgan Stanley’s Shalett Sees Big Tech’s Reign in Peril in 2025
* UBS Raised to Outperform at BNPP Exane on Buyback Potential (+)

WSJ : China Adds to Sanctions of U.S. Defense Contractors Over Taiwan Arms Sales

China Adds to Sanctions of U.S. Defense Contractors Over Taiwan Arms Sales
Beijing starts year with fresh warning to Trump of economic statecraft at its disposal

China started the year with a broadside against U.S. defense contractors, responding to recently ramped-up Taiwan arms sales by the Biden administration and laying down a fresh warning to President-elect Donald Trump of tools Beijing can use to protect national interests.

Beijing’s Ministry of Commerce on Thursday blacklisted 10 companies as “unreliable entities” barred from doing business in China and said it would block an additional 28 from buying unspecified components that could have dual civilian and military uses.

Most of the defense contractors named have previously been sanctioned by China and have little trade with the country, unlike some of the hundreds of Chinese entities with U.S. operations targeted in punishments by Washington, such as Huawei Technologies.

While the immediate impact is likely minimal, the measures are important as symbolic reminders of the kind of measures China could level more broadly against American corporations in any future conflict.

The ministry cited safeguarding national security in Thursday’s action and Xinhua News Agency said the targeted companies have engaged in military technology cooperation and arms sales with Taiwan in recent years, despite China’s strong opposition.

Beijing’s claim to Taiwan is its pre-eminent source of friction with the U.S., and under leader Xi Jinping, China regularly flexes military muscle with jet fighters and warships that demonstrate how it might conduct an invasion or impose a trade embargo of the island. In a New Year’s address, Xi issued a warning to the U.S. over Taiwan: “No one can ever sever the bond of kinship between us, and no one can ever stop China’s reunification, a trend of the times,” he said.

Despite Beijing’s admonishments, every U.S. administration has sold weapons to Taiwan, most recently Abrams tanks from General Dynamics ordered during Trump’s first term and recently delivered by the Biden administration. Under the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, the U.S. is committed to providing Taiwan with defensive weaponry and is obligated to treat threats to the democratically run island as a matter of “grave concern.”

​During the Biden years through November, the U.S. has reduced a backlog of weapons sold to Taiwan but not delivered, according to a blog post last month by Eric Gomez​, a senior fellow at​ the Washington-based Cato Institute​. Gomez pointed out that the Biden administration has put more emphasis on asymmetric systems and maintenance services to Taiwan, which don’t necessarily cost as much as traditional weaponry.

“While the first Trump administration sold Taiwan more weapons, the Biden administration sold Taiwan a better mix of weapons for Taiwan’s self-defense needs​,” Gomez wrote.

The 10 companies labeled Thursday as unreliable by China are units of defense contractors General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin and RTX’s Raytheon, all of which have been sanctioned previously by Beijing. Some of those groups’ units are among those now blocked from dual-use item purchases, along with Boeing’s Defense, Space & Security unit, which likewise has previously been targeted by Beijing. The companies declined to comment or didn’t respond to questions.

The companies now cut off from dual-use components include some new names, including Texas-based sensor technology maker Intelligent Epitaxy Technology, which said it is studying the announcement.

In a separate notice on Jan 2, the Commerce Ministry said it was mulling export restrictions on certain technologies used to prepare battery components and process lithium and gallium.

China is a large producer and processor of many critical minerals and a draft of the proposed limits was circulated publicly this week to canvas public opinion. Lithium and gallium are metals commonly used in rechargeable batteries and semiconductors.

The measures build on Chinese sanctions in recent months against a number of American drone industry players. One of the companies, California-based Skydio, said the measure was aimed at its elimination in order to “deepen the world’s dependence on Chinese drone suppliers.” Beijing has also blocked specialty minerals germanium and gallium from export to the U.S., which appeared related to U.S. efforts to limit Chinese access to high-end semiconductors. And it has lashed out at critics of its human-rights record, banning some prominent American politicians from China, including Trump’s designee for secretary of state, Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.).

After more than a decade of telling American companies they were at risk for participating in Taiwan sales, China in 2020 first sanctioned American defense contractors Lockheed, Raytheon and Boeing. Also during Trump’s first administration, China in 2019 said it would compile an unreliable-entity list after the U.S. blacklisted Huawei, then in 2023 added Lockheed and Raytheon following Biden administration sanctions on a clutch of Chinese enterprises blamed for building a spy balloon that traversed the U.S.

As the world’s largest trading nation by value, its No. 2 economy and a consistently large absorber of foreign direct investment, China, like the U.S., has a vast ability to conduct economic statecraft. Its actions against American defense contractors, like special investigations into the safety of U.S. agricultural products like wheat and beef, plus thickets of regulation and its claims of final approval over multinational corporate mergers, provide tastes of how Beijing can try to match the U.S. in levering economic heft to pressure a foreign adversary.

More could be in store once Trump returns to the White House, as the president-elect has vowed significant new pressure on Beijing, including with tariffs.

Before his November election, Trump suggested he would like to see a more transactional relationship with Taiwan—raising the question of whether he would step up arms sales to the island—and separately vowed retaliation against China if it were to threaten Taiwan. Trump told The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board in October that Xi wouldn’t dare to move against Taiwan because, he said, Xi sees Trump as “crazy,” but that if he did, “I would say: if you go into Taiwan, I’m sorry to do this, I’m going to tax you at 150% to 200%.”

In addition to unleashing its full military power, Beijing would be expected to use a variety of economic strategies in a showdown over Taiwan.

“China has been using a wider range of economic statecraft tools in recent years, particularly in response to Taiwan-specific policy moves by other countries, and these new sanctions on defense contractors seem to be consistent with that same pattern,” said Logan Wright, a partner at Rhodium Group in Washington.

A 2023 study by Rhodium Group and the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center concluded that Beijing has been more systematic in preparing such defenses than Russia was to counter Western sanctions it faced as a result of invading Ukraine.

The study concluded that the major democratic nations that make up the Group of Seven depend on more than $477 billion in Chinese goods that could be restricted from export by Beijing. At least $460 billion in G-7 direct investment assets would be at risk, it said, though Beijing would also need to consider how such measures could undermine domestic employment and other economic factors.