>>> Barrons weekend summary: positive on BHI, MGM

Barrons weekend summary: positive on BHI, MGM 

* Cover story: Donald Trump's proposal to slash the corporate tax rate form 35% to 15% might be too much, since it could significantly reduce the government's tax haul and add to the country's large debt burden, but a cut to 22% would be revenue-neutral, allowing businesses to produce just enough additional taxable income to offset the effect of the lower rate. 

* Features: 1) Profile of Michael Petry, chief portfolio manager for Danske Invest Hedge Fixed Income Strategies, believes global bond investors will have to navigate markets in which more interest-rate hikes will follow the one likely to occur in December; 2) Positive on BHI: The logic behind Baker Hughes' planned merger with GE's oil-and-gas unit makes sense, and could set up the new company-which would be less tied to oil-price cycles-to profit as energy prices rise; 3) Under a Trump administration, more merger deals are likely to succeed, and M&A arbitrate could remain a profitable investment strategy, yielding annualized double-digit percentage returns; 4) Positive on MGM: Company stands to benefit from Las Vegas' move to diversify beyond gambling into areas such as entertainment and professional sports, and it should continue to see strong earnings and cash flow. 

* Tech Trader: Positive on PSTG, NMBL, NTNX: Promising flash-based data-storage-equipment vendors could be takeover targets for larger tech companies that are falling behind in innovation, such as HPE and CSCO; VEEV, TEAM, and NOW could also be of interest to bigger rivals. 

Trader: A cut of six to seven percentage points in corporate tax rates should result in a 10% increase in earnings-per-share for small caps, says Jason Pride of Glenmede; Short-sellers have been taken by surprise by the post-election rally, and don't seem as if they're going to fight the new upward trend for now; Cautious on AXP: Card company has lagged in boosting its rewards program and could be squeezed by a trend in which consumers are paying off their balances each month. 

* Interview: Larry Jeddeloh, founder of TIS Group and publisher of the firm's Institutional Strategist newsletter, likes pipelines, defense stocks, and the dollar, and is betting against 10-year Treasuries (picks: UUP, ENB, ETP, ITA, GD, TBF). 

* Small Caps: Positive on TRCO: Chicago-based broadcaster took a hit because of a drop in political advertising during the presidential election, but the company is asset-rich, the market doesn't appear to appreciate the value of its properties-and its asset value could be twice its current share price. 

* Follow-Up: 1) Cautious on PG: Company has narrowed its focus with the sale of many of its brands, but the shares, which are up since last November, could stall if these efforts don't prove sufficient, and investors may want to take profits; 2) Puerto Rico's new governor, Ricardo Rossello, is viewed on Wall Street as a serious leader who wants to put the island on stronger financial footing, and his efforts to restructure its debt could benefit municipal bond holders. 

* European Trader: Italy's December 4 constitutional referendum-which seeks to strip the upper house of much of its power-could fail, leading to the fall of prime minister Matteo Renzi's government, which would endanger banks and put more pressure on the plummeting euro. 
* Asian Trader: The execution of the Indian government's unprecedented decision to take 500- and 1,000-rupee notes out of circulation was badly flawed, a situation that could derail the country's growth next year. 

* Emerging Markets: A stronger dollar resulting from the election of Donald Trump means emerging market currencies are likely to weaken, traders will flee risky assets, and emerging-market stocks and bonds should get cheaper. 

* Commodities: The cotton market has been heating up as winter "sweater season" approaches, but prices are likely to drop amid a global oversupply that hasn't been dented by shortfalls in India and bad weather in China. 

* Streetwise: Sentiment is crucial to the way the market operates; the fact that it matters can be seen in a recent CivicScience consumer survey, which found that American voters changed their holiday-gift plans after the election.

FT : Opec oil deal dominates market tone for the week

Opec oil deal dominates market tone for the week
Also — will there be fresh Wall Street records and what lies in store for gold bugs?

Will Opec deliver a meaningful production cut?
All eyes are on Vienna and Opec’s annual gathering with a keenly awaited decision on production levels. An Opec deal on Wednesday that delivers a concrete supply reduction of at least 1m barrels a day, with non-members such as Russia on board could boost oil beyond its recent $40-$50 range.
While traders pushed Brent towards $50 a barrel earlier last week, news on Friday that Saudi Arabia would not attend a meeting with Russia and Kazakhstan on Monday, prompted a pullback in the crude benchmark below $48.
The price action underscores the high stakes for oil traders should Opec stumble in trying to distribute a production cut among members before ministers convene their meeting. A sticking point appears to be Iran, recovering after years under western sanctions, and which believes it should be treated as a special case without any output restraints.
‘’A successful solution is likely to see oil move above $50 a barrel while a weak deal could see oil return below $45,’’ says Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank. However, that’s guarantee volatility will ease for crude he warns.
‘’Complying to agreed production limits has historical been a major challenge for Opec and the market is likely, once the initial rally has run its course, to adopt a wait-and-see approach while we wait for signs that the agreed cuts are being implemented.’’

Can a grand slam US equity market set fresh records?
Wall Street begins a new week after Thanksgiving, in a bullish frame, led by small-caps. Not surprisingly flow data last week showed more money leaving bonds and heading for shares. Equity bulls clearly like the prospect of a fiscal shot in the arm for the economy and a lower US tax rate boosting earnings in 2017. Hence an array of records being set with all four main US equity indices climbing into uncharted territory last week as investors for now ignore the prospect of corporate margins being eroded by higher wages and interest rates.
Mike Bell, global market strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, says: “An improving growth outlook in the US but with potential political risks to trade argue for both US and international investors to favour US domestic focused equities which benefit from rate rises, such as financials.”
Andrew Milligan, head of global strategy at Standard Life Investments, says equities have scope to rally further so long as Trump focuses on his domestic agenda for boosting the US economy and does not recycle his campaign rhetoric about trade and immigration, topics that have the potential to rattle investors. ‘’A steady trickle of positive domestic news is good for US equities.’’
He adds that the prospect of rising wages as the economy strengthens may well squeeze corporate margins, especially for smaller companies. However there is a case for a virtuous cycle whereby higher wages spur greater spending and productivity rises as Capex is boosted.

Can the euro and yen hold the line against the dollar?
A dominant US dollar, supported by rising expectations for a more active policy response from the Federal Reserve in 2017, has registered far and wide across global foreign exchange. Among the majors, the euro has slid 4 per cent from $1.10 to $1.05 since the US presidential contest triggered a sell-off in bonds and propelled US equities into record territory. The yen has slumped more than 7 per cent from ¥105 towards ¥114 over the period.
While the dollar cooled its heels towards the of last week, the monthly US jobs report due on Friday could spur another strong run for the global reserve currency. Having priced in a Fed rate tightening next month, markets also expect a robust jobs number for November after a gain of 161,000 in October.
Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman says the forces that have driven the dollar higher remain. ‘’One of the most important of these drivers has been the increase in US interest rates.’’ With a two-year Treasury yield of 1.16 per cent, the highest level seen for the policy sensitive benchmark since April 2010, it’s tough to bet against the dollar.

Does an ETF steamroller crush gold bugs?
Back in July all was well in the gold market with the price topping $1,375 an ounce as investors pumped money into exchange traded funds such as GLD. A stronger dollar and rising bond yields since the US election have triggered a big reversal in sentiment for gold, with the potential for a much bigger slide. Gold has dropped below $1,200 a troy ounce for the first time since February as ETF outflows have risen to their highest level since July 2015. As holdings in the funds become unprofitable at current prices, analysts warn the market could see further liquidation as analysts estimate 100-200 tonnes of gold has been bought above current levels. For gold bugs, memories of a year-to-date gain of 30 per cent back in July are fading fast. Gold remains up 11 per cent for 2016.

FT : Bayer-Monsanto deal is a bet on GM crop expansion

Bayer-Monsanto deal is a bet on GM crop expansion
Global planting of genetically modified seeds has slipped but long-term prospects look better

Bayer chief executive Werner Baumann pledged to create a “global leader in agriculture” when he unveiled the company’s blockbuster takeover of Monsanto in September.

Making a success of the $66bn deal will depend in significant part on the continued expansion of the market for genetically modified seeds, which Monsanto has led since the first commercial GM crops were planted in 1996.

Yet global planting of GM crops declined slightly in 2015, after two decades of rapid growth, and there is little sign of a sustained upturn in the near future. The markets for the crops that have led GM expansion so far — maize, soyabeans, cotton and canola — are largely saturated in the countries that are politically and agriculturally hospitable to GM, and few others are poised for introduction.

According to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, which surveys biotech crops annually, the total area planted fell from 181.5m hectares in 2014 to 179.7m last year. Randy Hautea, ISAAA global co-ordinator, says the small decline, the first in the history of GM crops, reflects low agricultural commodity prices rather than any rejection of the technology by farmers. “We expect it to increase when crop prices improve,” he adds.

The agrochemicals and crop biotechnology consultancy Phillips McDougall says seeds worth $37.2bn were sold in 2015, of which $19.8bn were GM. The total market fell by 8 per cent from 2014, while the GM segment was down 6 per cent, adds Allister Phillips, associate director. He is predicting further small declines in the global seeds market in 2016 and 2017 as crop prices remain low.

The downturn in the agriculture industry has been a key catalyst for the wave of deals sweeping through the suppliers of farmers’ seeds and crop sprays, including Bayer’s bid for Monsanto. The other large transactions are Dow Chemical’s proposed takeover of DuPont, and ChemChina’s planned acquisition of Syngenta.
All the deals are expected to face intense regulatory scrutiny, partly because of the risk that the enlarged companies will have the ability to charge farmers higher prices for seeds and sprays.

Monsanto is the undisputed GM market leader, with $10bn revenues in 2015, which came both from selling seeds and licensing genetic “traits” to other companies. The second-biggest seeds company including GM is DuPont’s Pioneer unit, and Syngenta is also a big player in the technology.

The agricultural consultancy PG Economics says farmers have good reason to buy GM seeds, even though these cost more than conventional alternatives, because they deliver “substantial economic and environmental benefits, allowing farmers to grow more with fewer resources”.

“Where farmers have been given the choice of growing GM crops, the economic benefits realised are clear and amounted to an average increase in profit of over $100 per hectare in 2014,” says Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics. These benefits come from several factors, including increased yields through reduced pest and weed damage, lower pesticide and herbicide costs, and less time and fuel spent spraying chemicals on crops — set against the higher price of GM seeds.

However, Pat Mooney, executive director of ETC Group, an agribusiness monitoring organisation, says farmers in countries where GM seeds are marketed aggressively by suppliers buy them for two reasons that have nothing to do with the technology’s intrinsic merits.


“One is that farmers have little choice,” adds Mr Mooney. “Speaking as a Canadian, it is almost impossible to buy conventional canola in Canada. The other reason is that for the last 20 years the companies have put their plant breeding talent into the GM portfolio and neglected conventional crops.”

The GM technology used so far is not intended directly to increase crop yields, says Mr Phillips. “Farmers adopt [GM] because it saves them money by reducing the cost of other agricultural inputs,” he adds.

Today’s GM crops have two main characteristics, or “input traits” as they are known in the seeds business. Herbicide tolerance enables the farmer to get rid of weeds by spraying the field with a product such as Monsanto’s Roundup that does not harm the crop. Insect resistance adds a bacterial gene that produces a toxin lethal to pests, so the farmer has to apply less pesticide.

The suppliers of GM seeds are now developing more sophisticated input traits — partly to deal with the resistance that weeds and insects are inevitably evolving in response to the first generation of products. This involves adding several herbicide and insect resistant genes to a single seed.

“I do think there is growth left in the GM seeds industry,” says Mr Phillips. The first driver of expansion will be the spread of current input-based technology to regions outside North America where markets are not saturated, particularly in Latin America and Asia.


In the long run GM technology will expand through the introduction of “output traits” which directly enhance crops’ yields or quality.

One that is beginning to make progress in the US is Monsanto’s DroughtGard maize, which is designed to thrive in prolonged spells of dry weather. Other yield-raising characteristics nearing commercialisation are tolerances of exceptional heat and salinity.

New GM crops reaching the market include apples that do not turn brown when sliced, and potatoes that resist “late blight” disease.

But the biggest boost would come from GM varieties of two of the world’s staple crops, rice and wheat, which have been genetically manipulated successfully in the laboratory but not yet commercialised.

This month UK researchers announced plans to grow a trial crop of GM wheat designed to generate higher yields through more efficient photosynthesis. “If we can show that yield increases in the field, even by 5 or 10 per cent, that would be an important development because wheat yields globally have reached a plateau,” says Malcolm Hawkesford, head of plant biology at Rothamsted Research in Hertfordshire.

“In the long run an expansion of GM technology into wheat and other crops could play a big role in ensuring food security, which is a major challenge, given the projected need to increase world food production by 40 per cent in the next 20 years and 70 per cent by 2050,” he adds.

Barron's : The Trump Rally Has Legs

The Trump Rally Has Legs
Bullishness begets bullishness: Investors bet on lower taxes, economic growth. The end of inversions? And, good news for retailers.

The stock market is up more than 3% just in the days since the surprise election of Republican Donald J. Trump. Many bulls are making comparisons to Ronald Reagan’s unexpected, pro-business victory back in 1980, right down to the “Make America Great Again” slogan.
There are important economic differences. In 1980 inflation was 14% and on its way down, and the dollar was at a generational low. Today inflation is 1.6% and rising, while the dollar is at decade highs. In 1982 U.S. unemployment exceeded 10%, double today’s level, and long-term Treasury yields were above 11%, almost five times as high as today’s. Government debt as a percentage of gross domestic product was about 30% back then, and roughly 100% now. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index sold for nine times earnings, half its price/earnings ratio today.
Still, there is one important resemblance that has meaning for the market’s near-term performance. “The similarities in sentiment between then and now are striking,” says Peter Cecchini, chief market strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald.
And markets, he notes, are “often largely a function of sentiment.”
Is the analogy powerful enough to explain how markets might behave? Near term, the market is likely to go higher. The various Republican tax reductions being considered, if enacted, would represent a meaningful increase to the corporate bottom line, particularly for small-capitalization companies. The optimism implied in the rally suggests the market expects Corporate America to reinvest some of those tax dollars in equipment and labor to get the economy and profits growing again, rather than spending only to buy back shares.
An inflection point in sentiment has driven stocks higher. The Trump administration’s first hundred days might actually count for a lot.
BEFORE THE ELECTION, tax “inversions” were a hot merger- and-acquisition topic. An inversion occurs when a U.S.-based company buys or merges with a foreign firm domiciled in a low-tax country, thereby reducing the combined company’s U.S. taxes.

U.S. corporate taxes of 35% are much higher than taxes in most of the rest of the world, and the Obama administration has been keen to stop inversions. A proposed merger between Pfizer (ticker: PFE) and Ireland-domiciled Allergan (AGN) went down in flames, for instance, after the Treasury Department tightened the rules on these deals.
Under Trump, inversions could be much less controversial. What the Obama administration did ham-handedly might yet be accomplished by tax incentives.
The key is the tax reform expected next year when a Republican president works with a GOP Congress. As Keith Moore, event-driven strategist at FBN Securities, notes, a reduction in the corporate tax rate might make inversions moot.
Expect the new government to be less antagonistic to mergers from an antitrust perspective (for more on the subject, see M&A feature). Says a Bush administration senior antitrust lawyer and Trump supporter: “[Trump’s] views are in line with conservative antitrust policy. Under Trump, if there are antitrust issues, we can expect a greater push for divestiture [of overlapping corporate assets] rather than long-term corporate behavioral regulation.”
Another important change might take place, says Moore: Foreign companies, especially Chinese companies, looking to buy U.S. technology or defense-related concerns will get more scrutiny than they did under Obama.
THAT SENTIMENT MATTERS can also be seen in a recent survey of consumers by CivicScience, a polling and market-intelligence firm. CivicScience CEO John Dick says his firm’s research suggests American voters changed their holiday gift-purchase plans after the election.
From Oct. 1 through Nov. 8, CivicScience polled almost 4,700 people who indicated which candidate they planned to vote for. Prior to the election 18% of Clinton supporters said they would spend more this holiday season compared with last year; 29% said they would spend less. After Clinton lost, CivicScience asked the same question again to half of the original respondents. Among Clinton voters, 16% said they would spend more and 34% would spend less.
Among Trump supporters, only 13% said before voting that they would spend more in the coming weeks and 33% said less. After the election, that changed to 18% and 27%, respectively. While the election seemingly affected consumer attitudes, we don’t know what this change means for the aggregate level of spending.
Retail stocks have been among the biggest beneficiaries of the election-fueled rally. Department stores are up 19%, and general merchandise outlets, 17%. The National Retail Federation is projecting a 3.6% rise in holiday retail sales, up from 3.2% last year.

Barron's : A Top European Hedge Fund’s Latest Bets

A Top European Hedge Fund’s Latest Bets
Michael Petry trades everything from mortgage bonds to euro swaps to achieve stellar returns.

Michael Petry enjoyed his job in the late 1990s overseeing foreign-currency reserves at Danmarks Nationalbank, the Danish central bank in Copenhagen. “While ours is a small country of just five million people, managing currencies is the great equalizer, where Denmark can be just as important as Germany and the United Kingdom,” says Petry.
But the more he learned about foreign-exchange cross rates and derivatives trading, the more he realized the many things central bankers couldn’t do. “The primary goal of the central bank for the past several decades isn’t profits,” notes Petry, “but maintaining a tight exchange rate with, first, the German Deutsche mark, then with the euro, which it has done exceedingly well.” Denmark never joined the euro zone and has its own currency—the krone—though it is a member of the European System of Central Banks. Petry and his co-workers at the central bank bought and sold the krone to keep it aligned with the euro.

In 2000, however, the opportunity to generate profits arrived, and Petry jumped at it, becoming a senior dealer of swaps and options trading at Danske Markets, part of Danske Bank (ticker: DANSKE.Denmark), the country’s largest lender. Five years later, he moved to an affiliate, Danske Capital, which runs 107 billion euros ($113 billion) for local retail clients and global institutional customers. Petry, now 46, is the chief portfolio manager for the firm’s flagship hedge fund, Danske Invest Hedge Fixed Income Strategies, which handles $1.15 billion, making it one of Scandinavia’s largest funds.
Petry, who was born in Viborg, a town in northern Denmark, believes global bond investors will have to navigate markets in which a U.S. interest-rate hike in December will be followed by a couple more in 2017. And by the end of next year, he thinks, continental growth will allow the European Central Bank to start tapering its quantitative-easing program. Amid these currents, fixed-income investors will also have to cope with the uncertainties caused by Donald J. Trump’s election as president and the U.K.’s decision to exit the European Union.
THE FUND TENDS TO stay a little closer to home, with the bulk of its portfolio in Scandinavian securities. It does, however, buy euro-, sterling-, yen-, and U.S. dollar–linked products. The firm has used its qualitative and quantitative skills to become one of the top performing fixed-income arbitrage players in the world. Since its inception in 2005, the fund has generated annualized gains, net of fees, of more than 12%, with volatility of less than 9%, through October 2016. Its trailing one- and five-year records are even more impressive, up more than 15% a year, with volatility under 6.4%. That means it generates consistently high returns while effectively managing its risk. It’s particularly notable since the fund employs leverage. For this package, it charges a relatively modest 0.75% annual management fee along with a 20% performance fee.
Although the fund uses about 50 different strategies, one of its mainstays is Scandinavian mortgage bonds. Mortgage securities may conjure images of the U.S. financial crisis, but these are highly rated debt issues from mortgage firms that keep the mortgages on their books and are responsible for maintaining a healthy pool of them to support the bonds. The securities have never defaulted in over two centuries.
Since the start of the financial crisis, the fund has been long Swedish and Danish mortgage bonds of various maturities, profiting from the spread between their yields and the fund’s hedging and financing costs. Its sweet spot is bonds with three-to-five-year maturities, which it often buys at auction at a slight discount and holds for one to two years. Petry has found this trade to be a consistent winner.
Earlier this year, market turmoil opened a gap between five-year Danish mortgage bond rates and five-year swap rates, which mirror five-year Euribor yields. By buying the mortgage bond and shorting the swap, Petry hedges his interest-rate risk and bets that the rate spread will narrow. Because short-term rates are negative in Europe, he also collects a small profit by borrowing to finance his position. “This extra benefit will likely continue as long as the ECB keeps short-term rates negative,” Petry says. So far this year, the trade has added two percentage points to the fund’s performance.

The fund’s trades can be intricate, but its goals and methods are straightforward. Using proprietary software, Petry and his team of three managers constantly scan millions of pair trades to identify when interest-rate spreads between two fixed-income instruments are reaching historical extremes.
“Focusing on historical-spread shifts instead of short-term blips helps us reduce risk, giving us high conviction about our investments,” says Petry. He further limits risk by booking modest gains if spreads start to move in the expected direction, rather than waiting for them to fully normalize.
Late last year, for example, Petry saw that the spread between five-year Swedish swap rates’ five-year forwards and equivalent euro rates had spiked to 0.75% from 0.50%, breaking the previous historical high. (Five-year forward rates reflect anticipated yields 60 months into the future.)
Since the Swedish central bank’s key inflation target is generally the same as that of the ECB, these rates don’t generally deviate much, and Petry couldn’t detect a fundamental reason for this anomaly. So the fund went long the Swedish swap and short the euro swap.
The gap quickly widened to a full percentage point, so Petry added to his position. That spread proved to be the inflection point. He started selling when the spread fell back to 0.75% in May 2016. This month, it was down to 0.65%, and the fund continued to book profits. Petry retains 25% of the original stake, believing there is more narrowing to come. To date, the trade has added 0.5 percentage point to the fund’s 2016 profit.
Petry and company have no problem cutting their losses if a trade doesn’t seem to be working. “We can always get back into a trade if conditions become more compelling,” Petry says, “but we know markets can stay irrational longer than investors can remain liquid.”

The fund has to be vigilant about risk because it typically uses 30-to-50 times leverage to enhance returns; low levels for securities with longer duration (and higher volatility), higher amounts for shorter-duration plays. But Petry applies an equal amount of leverage on both sides of most trades, focusing on the change in rate spreads—not the return offered by a single interest-rate move. This means that, unlike traditional fixed-income investors, the fund will have no problem profiting when, as expected, rates start moving up.
The firm’s resolve to control losses, as well as its historical perspective, were on display with a bet on 20-year euro swap rates going out two decades. Rates on this derivative have been trending down since 2001 because of Europe’s slowing growth and declining interest rates. But when it collapsed below 2% during the financial crisis, rebounded, and then bounced off that level several times during subsequent banking and sovereign debt crises, Petry felt 2% had been set as a bottom for this instrument.
So when it again fell through 2% in the third quarter of 2014 as the ECB started talking about added monetary easing, the fund established a short position that eventually represented 5% of its risk exposure.
“We felt inflation and growth would inevitably return and, with them, normalizing interest rates, which would send this forward rate back well above 2%,” explains Petry.
Unfortunately for Danske, the ECB then went further than expected and committed itself to quantitative easing and negative rates, which pulled the floor out from under the trade. So the fund liquidated half the position, taking a half percentage-point loss. But Petry decided to keep a portion because he sees these forward rates as “absurdly low” and believes it won’t require much news about growth for them to spike upward.
WHAT DOES THE NEXT YEAR hold for global fixed income? “The election of Trump has introduced all kinds of uncertainty,” says Petry. But he sees opportunities, owing to the president-elect’s commitment to infrastructure and job creation, which means rising government and consumer spending and the likelihood of higher interest rates. “I’m expecting this to have a spillover effect in Europe, as growth continues to improve and long rates normalize,” he says.
But he’s most concerned about the return of increasingly nationalistic governments. “Victories for Brexit and Trump are triumphs for more-isolationist policies, ignoring the value that trade treaties have had on the promotion of stability,” Petry says. Accordingly, he fears the West may be entering a period in which the lack of cooperation between nations may lead to more international turmoil, capable of turning warm issues hot. “And markets don’t like that,” he adds.
Trump may remove some bank regulations in the U.S., but Petry thinks European banks will continue to shed their market-making role and sell off debt from their portfolios. Fewer players mean less liquidity and more volatility, especially if conflicts arise. That may be a chilling prospect to many, but it offers opportunities for a nimble trader who profits from mispricing.

Barron's : A Critical Referendum on Dec. 4, for Italy and the Euro

A Critical Referendum on Dec. 4, for Italy and the Euro
If Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s reforms are rejected, his government could fall, endangering banks and putting more pressure on the plummeting euro.

Italians will go to the polls on Dec. 4 in a referendum on constitutional reforms, a vote that has far-reaching implications for the stability of the country and the euro.

Voters will be asked to strip the Senate, or the upper house, of much of its power, leaving the lower house, the Chamber of Deputies, as the primary lawmaker. Approval of the referendum would make Italy easier to govern, smoothing passage of legislation and increasing government steadiness.

Prime Minister Matteo Renzi could be staking his political future on approval, essentially turning the referendum into a vote of confidence on his pro-reform government. It’s a gamble he could lose. Polls suggest that voters will reject the referendum, delivering a blow to Italy’s economic reforms and continuing an antiestablishment trend that has seen the United Kingdom opt to quit the European Union and Donald J. Trump win the U.S. presidency. In both those instances, opinion polls mostly were wrong.

Renzi appears to be backtracking on his threat to resign if the proposals are rejected. Regardless, a negative outcome is likely to lead to a period of political complexity, which means uncertainty for investors.

“IT IS A CRITICAL MOMENT,” says Francesco Filia, CEO and chief investment officer at Fasanara Capital, who believes that investors should be positioned for disorder.

To some extent, markets already have factored in a rejection of Italy’s referendum. Italian stocks are down 23% in 2016, making Milan by some distance the worst-performing major market in Western Europe. In contrast, the Stoxx Europe 600 index is down 6.4%.

Yields on Italian government bonds, known as BTPs, have ballooned. On Friday, the 10-year BTP yielded 2.10%. The yield spread between 10-year BTPs and German government bonds, or Bunds, of similar maturity has widened to 186 basis points (1.86 percentage points) from 97 basis points at the start of 2016.

The best-case scenario for markets is for the referendum to win approval. Renzi would remain in office, domestic investment could accelerate, and markets could outperform. It would be especially positive for Italian banks, as two of the leading players— UniCredit (ticker: UCG.Italy) and Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (BMPS.Italy)—need to be recapitalized.

Stocks that have been undeservedly hit in this year’s selloff could rebound. One is aerospace and defense company Leonardo-Finmeccanica (LDO.Italy), which makes AgustaWestland helicopters and is a parts manufacturer for the Eurofighter Typhoon and the U.S.’s F-35 Lightning II.

Its shares have rallied recently but are down 6.1% in 2016. “An Italy risk premium has been created in this stock,” says Laurent Ducoin, head of European equities at Amundi, which owns Leonardo-Finmeccanica stock. The shares, which closed Friday at 12.12 euros ($12.84), trade for just 12.3 times estimated 2017 earnings, well below their peers.

IN THE EVENT the reforms are rejected and Renzi resigns, the implications are much more complicated. It is possible that Renzi’s center-left Democratic Party-led government could form a new administration, headed by one of his cabinet members, with a short term and a narrow mandate, such as writing a new electoral law. Italian equity markets probably would underperform, and the political malaise could delay capital injections at the beleaguered banks. Spreads on the 10-year bonds could widen.

In a worst-case scenario, a new government couldn’t be formed and national elections would be held, paving the way for popular euro-skeptic parties led by the Five Star Movement to put together a new administration. They could push for a referendum on continuing membership in the euro zone, which would have a destabilizing effect on the entire area.

If that happens, the euro, whose decline against the dollar has accelerated in the past few months, could face more stress. “The systemic consequences for the whole area would be material,” maintains Deutsche Bank senior economist Marco Stringa. “So the euro would probably depreciate, although it is difficult to calibrate by how much.” On Friday, the European currency was worth $1.059.

This outcome likely would precipitate a massive widening of BTP spreads and plummeting stock prices.

While Italy will take center stage in coming weeks, the road is littered with political risk in Europe in 2017: There will be elections in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Austria, while the U.K.’s Brexit negotiations are another obstacle. Add to that uncertainty about the policies of Trump and his administration, and markets could be unsettled for a while.

Barron's : Trump Victory Could Be a Boon to Deal Stocks

Trump Victory Could Be a Boon to Deal Stocks
Trump’s administration will likely be more lenient on mergers. How to capture double-digit returns.

The Obama administration took a tough antitrust stance on corporate mergers and acquisitions, but investors expect a more relaxed attitude under President-elect Donald J. Trump. Yet even as deals seem more likely to succeed, M&A arbitrage—a bet that a transaction will go through—could remain a profitable investment strategy, yielding annualized double-digit percentage returns.
Here’s how it works: Shares of the target company in a pending acquisition typically sell at a discount to the final offer price until the deal closes. The spread between the market price and buyout price reflects investor uncertainty that the transaction will occur, for regulatory or other reasons. The wider the spread, the greater the perceived risk.

Investors who buy the seller’s shares have an opportunity to lock in a relatively quick and secure profit, as spreads tend to narrow with the approach of a deal’s closing date, and disappear when the transaction is done. Some practitioners of “merger arb,” especially professional investors, also short the buyer’s stock, which usually falls ahead of the closing date.
There are four main risks to M&A, and to M&A arbitrage: financing, contract issues, shareholder approval, and regulatory objections. The last weighed particularly heavily on M&A activity in the past year.
SINCE THE ELECTION, however, arbitrage spreads have tightened to 8% to 9% from 11%, reflecting the market’s belief that Trump-appointed regulators will have a lighter touch. “History suggests Republicans have been less regulatory in nature and more favorable to deals,” says Alex Vogel, a managing partner at VogelHood Group, a Washington-based policy, research, and consulting firm that evaluates regulatory risk.
With interest rates rising and bond prices falling, M&A arbitrage also looks less risky than other yield-oriented investment strategies, says Ilya Feygin, senior strategist at WallachBeth Capital.
The market currently offers several attractive merger-arbitrage opportunities, including some all-cash deals with a high likelihood of closing on schedule. WallachBeth likesHarman International Industries (ticker: HAR), which drew a $112-a-share cash bid fromSamsung Electronics (005930.Korea), the electronics giant, earlier this month. Harman, which makes automotive infotainment systems, recently fetched $109.50.

The linkup is unlikely to pose antitrust problems. Samsung and Harman don’t have materially overlapping businesses, and vertical deals tend not to be blocked, Feygin says. He expects the takeover to close next spring. Based on Harman’s price, investors could realize an annualized return of 5.6%.
Another merger-arb investor, Jean-François Comte, co-president of Lutetia Capital, likes privately held Bass Pro Shops’ $5.5 billion, or $65.50-a-share bid for rival Cabela’s(CAB), which would create an outdoor-sporting-goods empire. Cabela’s shares shot up 15% after the deal was announced Oct. 3, and traded last week at $62.18. Some skeptics see antitrust risk, but Comte is confident, given the plethora of small retailers competing in the market for outdoor sports equipment. Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) also is a player. He looks for the deal to close by spring, for an annualized return of 15.3%.
ONE ADVANTAGE OF merger arbitrage is that its returns don’t depend on the stock market, says Roy Behren, co-manager of the Merger fund. NXP Semiconductors(NXPI), which received a $110-a-share cash bid in October from Qualcomm (QCOM), is a fund holding. NXP recently traded for $99.33, 10.7% below the bid.
A Qualcomm-NXP pairing would be the largest deal in the semiconductor industry’s history. That alone suggests it will attract regulatory attention. But Qualcomm specializes in smartphones, while NXP makes automotive products, an area in which Qualcomm hopes to expand. Behren expects the transaction to close in nine months, pending regulatory approval in other nations, including China. He’s looking for an annualized return of 12.6%.
Another deal expected to yield a double-digit annualized return is Danone ’s (BN.France) proposed $12.5 billion purchase of WhiteWave Foods (WWAV). Shares of WhiteWave are trading at $55.12, versus a buyout offering price of $56.25. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reportedly is examining the deal. The Cornucopia Institute, which represents small organic farms, has complained it would concentrate organic dairy production. Danone, which owns Stonyfield Farm, an organic yogurt brand, would be acquiring WhiteWave’s organic milk and yogurt brands.
Lutetia’s Comte says the antitrust risk is “probably overblown.” The companies might need to divest some product lines, but the market is highly competitive, with relatively low barriers to entry. Earlier in November, Dean Foods (DF) and Cropp, an independent-farmer cooperative, announced a partnership under which Dean would process, refrigerate, and deliver organic milk. That is a positive for the WhiteWave acquisition, he says. Spreads tightened on the Dean news.
WallachBeth’s Feygin thinks Rockwell Collins ’ (COL) $62-a-share cash-and-stock bid for B/E Aerospace (BEAV) should be in any merger-arb portfolio. Since both make components for aircraft cockpits, there’s fear U.S. or foreign regulators will block the marriage. Also, one large Rockwell holder reportedly might try to disrupt the deal. While one or both might have to divest minor operations to satisfy regulators, Feygin expects the deal to close by mid-2017, offering investors an annualized return of 10%-15%.

Most merger-arbitrage investors recommend buying several deal stocks as insurance against the failure of any one transaction. That seems particularly advisable if betting on the largest pending deal: AT&T ’s (T) controversial $109 billion offer for Time Warner (TWX), announced last month. Candidate Trump said merging the media companies would put “too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.” But President Trump might feel differently.
AT&T’s bid equals $107.50 a share, 15.9% above Time Warner’s recent $92.78. As the spread suggests, investors fear the Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department will withhold approval. But says VogelHood’s Vogel: “Our analysis and data on past deals says this deal gets done.” If he’s right, it would be a home run for arbitrageurs, returning an annualized 15.6%.
Another huge deal, the $66 billion bid by Germany’s Bayer (BAYN.Germany) thatMonsanto (MON) has accepted, also is controversial. Monsanto is trading about 20% below the $128-a-share offer, with good reason. Even under Trump, the merger, which would create a agricultural-chemical and seed behemoth, faces tough antitrust hurdles, especially in Europe. This one might be more suited for speculators than investors.

>>> Clinton campaign says it will join efforts by the Green Party to push for re

Clinton campaign says it will join efforts by the Green Party to push for recounts in some battleground states that had close margins of victory for Trump 
- Clinton campaign lawyer stresses that the campaign's own investigation has not uncovered any evidence of hacking of voting systems, but has decided to take part in the effort to "ensure that it is fair to all sides."
- The Green Party has asked for a recount in Wisconsin and has said it will also ask for recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan.
- In a statement today President-elect Donald Trump said that "the election is over...The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, 'We must accept this result and then look to the future...This is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded, and the results of this election should be respected instead of being challenged and abused, which is exactly what Jill Stein is doing."

>>> Verbund open to acquisitions in Germany

Verbund open to acquisitions in Germany (translated)

Verbund [VER:AV], a state-controlled Austrian energy group, is open to the idea of growing via acquisitions in Germany, Euro am Sonntag reported. The German magazine quoted Wolfgang Anzengruber, the chief executive of Verbund. Anzengruber gave an interview in the context of the German government plan’s to restrict electricity trading with Austria from 2018 onwards.
When asked if the so-called “electricity border” could lead to Verbund seeking acquisitive growth in Germany, Anzengruber answered that he cannot rule out such buys and that Verbund would look at suitable targets in terms of electricity producers and municipal utilities.
Verbund has a market cap of EUR 4.806bn

>>> Infineon has not been approached by potential bidders from China

Infineon has not been approached by potential bidders from China (translated)

Infineon [IFX:GR], a German semiconductor group, has not been contacted by potential bidders from China, Euro am Sonntag reported. The German-language magazine quoted Reinhard Ploss, the chief executive of Infineon. Ploss was asked about a potential Chinese bid in connection with other German technology experts being approached by the Chinese firms.
Without naming sources, the article suggested that Ploss probably no longer has to worry about takeover bids from China after Infineon recently acquiring California-based rival International Rectifier [IR]. The deal supposedly makes Infineon a security-relevant business for the US government, which means that a sale to a Chinese company is more or less taboo.
On a different note, Ploss explained in the report that he believes that Infineon’s capital-intensive production process are likely to fend off potential bidders from the US. He said that Infineon is not a “bargain” and that any bidder would have to prove that they can do a better job than Infineon.
Infineon has a market cap of EUR 18.15bn.
The original article was published in this week’s print edition of Euro am Sonntag on page 34 (“Invest Aktien” section).