>>> Fed's Brainard (Dove, Voter): expansive fiscal policies could lead to higher

Fed's Brainard (Dove, Voter): expansive fiscal policies could lead to higher inflation, interest rate increases 
- Gradual path of rate hikes will be appropriate as long as inflationary pressures are muted
- Risks to domestic economy is closer to being balanced
- Confirms that Fed is likely to raise rates more rapidly if fiscal policy changes quickly to eliminate labor market slack
- Full employment is within reach, could be sustainable with the right policy mix

>>> ExxonMobil to buy Bass Family-owned Bopco and other Permian Basin companies

ExxonMobil to buy Bass Family-owned Bopco and other Permian Basin companies for up to USD 6.6bn
17 JAN 2017
ExxonMobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM), an Irving, Texas-based oil and gas exploration company, will buy Bopco, LP and other Permian Basin energy companies from the Bass family of Fort Worth, Texas, for up to USD 6.6bn.
The deal will more than double Exxon's Permian Basin resource to 6 billion barrels of oil equivalent, adding 3.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent in New Mexico’s Delaware Basin.
ExxonMobil, the largest publicly traded international oil and gas company with a market cap of USD 358.11bn, is also the largest refiner and marketer of petroleum products, and its chemical company is one of the world's largest.
Press release:
Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) said today it will more than double its Permian Basin resource to 6 billion barrels of oil equivalent through the acquisition of companies owned by the Bass family of Fort Worth, Texas, with an estimated resource of 3.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent in New Mexico’s Delaware Basin, a highly prolific, oil-prone section of the Permian Basin.
ExxonMobil will make an upfront payment of USD 5.6bn in ExxonMobil shares, and a series of additional contingent cash payments totaling up to USD 1bn, to be paid beginning in 2020 and ending no later than 2032 commensurate with the development of the resource.
Darren W. Woods, ExxonMobil chairman and chief executive officer, said the high-quality properties are a major addition to ExxonMobil’s unconventional liquids portfolio managed by its subsidiary, XTO Energy Inc.
“This acquisition strengthens ExxonMobil’s significant presence in the dominant U.S. growth area for onshore oil production,” said Woods. “This investment gives us an exceptional Delaware Basin position in a proven multi-stacked play that can generate attractive returns in a low-price environment.
“The highly-contiguous position will provide significant cost advantages in developing 3.4 billion barrels of resource, of which 75 percent is liquids. By utilizing ExxonMobil’s technological strength coupled with its unconventional development capabilities we can drill the longest lateral wells in the Permian Basin, reducing development costs and increasing reserve capture.”
The acquired companies, which include the operating entity BOPCO, hold about 275,000 acres of leasehold, and production of more than 18,000 net oil equivalent barrels per day, about 70 percent of which is liquids. This includes about 250,000 acres of leasehold in the Permian Basin, the bulk of that in contiguous, held-by-production units in the New Mexico Delaware Basin, with more than 60 billion barrels of oil equivalent estimated in place. The companies also hold producing acreage in other areas in the United States.
ExxonMobil is producing approximately 140,000 net oil-equivalent barrels per day across its Permian Basin leasehold

>>> Gas Natural appoints Rothschild to conduct Italian unit sale - sources

Gas Natural appoints Rothschild to conduct Italian unit sale - sources

17 JAN 2017
Gas Natural Fenosa [BME:GAS] (GNF), a Spanish gas utility, has appointed Rothschild to dispose of its Italian business which may go on sale next month, two sources briefed on the situation said.

Last month, this news service reported that GNF had entered discussions with a number of banks pitching ideas to either grow or dispose of its Italian business, with Rothschild the front-runner among potential advisers.

GNF is now looking to launch a sale next month, the two sources briefed said. A sector lawyer said he thought the process will likely be a market test, and the company has yet to fully decide if it intends to exit Italy or commit to growing the business.

The unit is being valued at around EUR 700m, the sources briefed and the lawyer said. However, the eventual figure is likely to be less than this, the sources briefed, the sector lawyer and a sector banker following the situation said.

When taking into account any debt placed on GNF’s Italian business, the final sale consideration may be less, the first source briefed said. A figure closer to EUR 500m is more likely, the sector lawyer added.

The structure of regional energy concessions in Italy may hamper the process, the banker following said. Unless the company is the local concession holder it does not have control over developing assets in the area, the banker said.

Italgas [BIT:IG] would be in the best position to consolidate in this space, the banker and second source briefed said.

After Italgas, the unit may be of interest to infrastructure funds, the second source briefed added.

However, with infrastructure funds, there is a difficulty in forming a valuation for the unit, the lawyer said, with its regulated assets being valued on a multiple of the regulated asset base, and its merchant power assets valued using a different metric such as EBITDA.

Players that have been linked to the aborted sale of Eni's [BIT:ENI] gas and power unit would be logical parties with a potential interest in the unit, a third sourced briefed on the matter said, pointing to EDF's [EPA:EDF] Edison, Centrica [LON:CNA], Warburg Pincus, Permira, Bain Capital and CVC as examples.

GNF's Italian business recorded EBITDA of EUR 66m in 2015, according to GNF's annual report.

GNF has been present in Italy since 2002 and owns four subsidiaries: Gas Natural Italia, Gas Natural Vendita Italia, Gas Natural Distribuzione Italia and Gas Natural Rigassificazione Italia.

GNF and Italgas did not respond to requests for comment. Rothschild declined to comment.

(Recode.net) Sony Pictures potential target for Amazon, Apple, Facebook or Alpha



From: LAURENT CHEKROUN (MAKOR SECURITIES LO) At: 01/17/17 15:12:46
Subject: (Recode.net) Sony Pictures would make an interesting buy for a tech giant
Sony Pictures would make an interesting buy for a tech giant
Exclusive movies and TV shows might entice Amazon or Apple or Facebook or Alphabet.


The big contest between tech giants Amazon, Alphabet, Apple and Facebook is getting you to use only use their product; really a fool’s ambition.

So short of having the better, cooler tech, the best way to keep people coming back (or locked in) is to offer exclusive things the other guys don’t have: Namely, media. So owning a content machine like Sony Pictures Entertainment — and its movies and TV shows — could help a tech company set itself apart.

Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Alphabet are already doing a pretty good job keeping people glued to their services. And as much as they’d like to create a walled garden, they know they can’t do that entirely. But owning a content producer like Sony potentially makes that easier.

Why Sony Pictures? Sony’s entertainment division became a distinct acquisition target last week after chairman and CEO Michael Lynton announced he’ll be stepping down in February and will become chairman of Snap Inc., just ahead of its IPO this year.

Calls for a sale aren’t new. Activist investor Dan Loeb pushed for one a few years ago, and speculation renewed in 2014 after Sony suffered one of the worst hacks in corporate history.

Sony Pictures is still profitable, but the real prize is its TV arm, which is one of the biggest producers of original shows like “The Blacklist,” which airs on NBC. It also owns distribution rights to longstanding hits like “Seinfeld,” which will look for a new home after it finishes its run on Hulu in 2020.

The point is, Sony owns and distributes a lot of original content. Having that in the arsenal could be more important as video has become a kernel tactic among internet companies to set themselves apart from the next guy.

That’s why Amazon produces original movies and shows for its Prime subscribers, why YouTube started a subscription music service (with plans this year to release a TV streaming service), why Facebook is talking to TV studios about licensing its own shows and why Apple wants to create its own movies and TV shows.

Don’t discount the pride (or ego) that comes from being the guy who pays for award-winning movies and TV shows. Few missed Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos grinning at a front-row table at the Golden Globes with Matt Damon.

There are big caveats here. Philosophically, tech companies — especially Facebook and Apple — tend to treat content, whether user-generated or licensed, as a marketing function.

Apple’s latest look at producing original video, for example, is devised to make Apple Music look different from Spotify. Both services already significantly overlap, offering almost all the same artists. So there’s little reason anyone, even audiophiles, would pay for both — unlike online video, where it’s conceivable a Hulu subscriber also pays for Netflix. Given that, buying something as large and potentially expensive as Sony Pictures likely wouldn’t figure into its strategy.

The clear exception, so far, is Amazon, which has already spent billions on original content, and Bezos sees it as adding unbreakable value to its Prime program.

A player like Netflix is less likely to make a serious consideration for something as big as Sony since it would be way out of its price range.

What is Sony Pictures worth? Using a recent deal that would have valued rival Paramount Pictures at $10 billion would bring Sony Pictures’ up to $30 billion*, which is crazy since the total market value of Sony itself is $40 billion.

Tech companies generally don’t go for deals that big. Tech founders and CEOs have yet to bring themselves to sky-high deals usually seen among media titans like John Malone, Rupert Murdoch and Sumner Redstone. That era is over.

(That said, the Hollywood Reporter now says CBS head Les Moonves might want to buy Sony Pictures, which makes sense since he’s always wanted to run a large movie studio.)

But if Silicon Valley’s best and brightest want to fulfill their unspoken ambition to take over the world (isn’t that what they really want?), Mark Zuckerberg and Larry Page and Tim Cook and Jeff Bezos will have to start embracing some brass.

If they wait a bit, these properties could become cheaper. Traditional media businesses aren’t growing as fast as they used to, and all the major entertainment conglomerates are quietly assessing how, or if, they should offload parts of their business. It’s a growing list that now includes prize targets CBS, ESPN and CNN as well as Sony Pictures.

Look at ESPN, for example, which has been contending with softer ratings, translating to fewer ad dollars and less in carriage fees from cable and telecom operators.

CBS executives have been looking to tie up with a tech giant for a few years, according to sources. They know growth isn’t going to sustain in the traditional TV ecosystem since fewer people sign up for pay-TV subscriptions. More on that here.

In fact, all TV networks have come under pressure since their business is built around getting paid per TV subscriber, and there are fewer subscribers every year.

Also, movie studios have generally fallen out of favor by their parent companies — they’re fickle revenue beasts, often the least predictable business unit in the house.

In the case of Sony, it fell to fifth place among movie studios last year with less than $1 billion in box office sales — just a few years after scoring second place in 2012 with more than $1.8 billion.

Sony Pictures may not be the answer. But there’s something real in Peak TV, the idea promulgated by FX president John Landgraf that the explosion in original TV shows — thanks to Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc. — now makes it harder for good shows to stand out.

That only underscores the priority behind owning content studios. The rise in programming from Amazon and Netflix and now possibly Apple and Google means Silicon Valley is just recreating the machine Hollywood created.

There are already good studios in the system. No need to reinvent them, if they’re already available.

* Here’s the math: Since Paramount generates about $2.6 billion a year, only a third of Sony Pictures, that $10 billion value suggests a multiple of 3.8 times its sales. Sony Pictures’ approximately $8 billion in revenue would imply a deal value of $30 billion. Lots of caveats here, given Sony was hacked and it fell to fifth place in the studio rankings. That said, it also potentially shows why Sony CEO Kaz Hirai would unload the unit.

(Recode.net) Sony Pictures would make an interesting buy for a tech giant

Sony Pictures would make an interesting buy for a tech giant
Exclusive movies and TV shows might entice Amazon or Apple or Facebook or Alphabet.


The big contest between tech giants Amazon, Alphabet, Apple and Facebook is getting you to use only use their product; really a fool’s ambition.

So short of having the better, cooler tech, the best way to keep people coming back (or locked in) is to offer exclusive things the other guys don’t have: Namely, media. So owning a content machine like Sony Pictures Entertainment — and its movies and TV shows — could help a tech company set itself apart.

Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Alphabet are already doing a pretty good job keeping people glued to their services. And as much as they’d like to create a walled garden, they know they can’t do that entirely. But owning a content producer like Sony potentially makes that easier.

Why Sony Pictures? Sony’s entertainment division became a distinct acquisition target last week after chairman and CEO Michael Lynton announced he’ll be stepping down in February and will become chairman of Snap Inc., just ahead of its IPO this year.

Calls for a sale aren’t new. Activist investor Dan Loeb pushed for one a few years ago, and speculation renewed in 2014 after Sony suffered one of the worst hacks in corporate history.

Sony Pictures is still profitable, but the real prize is its TV arm, which is one of the biggest producers of original shows like “The Blacklist,” which airs on NBC. It also owns distribution rights to longstanding hits like “Seinfeld,” which will look for a new home after it finishes its run on Hulu in 2020.

The point is, Sony owns and distributes a lot of original content. Having that in the arsenal could be more important as video has become a kernel tactic among internet companies to set themselves apart from the next guy.

That’s why Amazon produces original movies and shows for its Prime subscribers, why YouTube started a subscription music service (with plans this year to release a TV streaming service), why Facebook is talking to TV studios about licensing its own shows and why Apple wants to create its own movies and TV shows.

Don’t discount the pride (or ego) that comes from being the guy who pays for award-winning movies and TV shows. Few missed Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos grinning at a front-row table at the Golden Globes with Matt Damon.

There are big caveats here. Philosophically, tech companies — especially Facebook and Apple — tend to treat content, whether user-generated or licensed, as a marketing function.

Apple’s latest look at producing original video, for example, is devised to make Apple Music look different from Spotify. Both services already significantly overlap, offering almost all the same artists. So there’s little reason anyone, even audiophiles, would pay for both — unlike online video, where it’s conceivable a Hulu subscriber also pays for Netflix. Given that, buying something as large and potentially expensive as Sony Pictures likely wouldn’t figure into its strategy.

The clear exception, so far, is Amazon, which has already spent billions on original content, and Bezos sees it as adding unbreakable value to its Prime program.

A player like Netflix is less likely to make a serious consideration for something as big as Sony since it would be way out of its price range.

What is Sony Pictures worth? Using a recent deal that would have valued rival Paramount Pictures at $10 billion would bring Sony Pictures’ up to $30 billion*, which is crazy since the total market value of Sony itself is $40 billion.

Tech companies generally don’t go for deals that big. Tech founders and CEOs have yet to bring themselves to sky-high deals usually seen among media titans like John Malone, Rupert Murdoch and Sumner Redstone. That era is over.

(That said, the Hollywood Reporter now says CBS head Les Moonves might want to buy Sony Pictures, which makes sense since he’s always wanted to run a large movie studio.)

But if Silicon Valley’s best and brightest want to fulfill their unspoken ambition to take over the world (isn’t that what they really want?), Mark Zuckerberg and Larry Page and Tim Cook and Jeff Bezos will have to start embracing some brass.

If they wait a bit, these properties could become cheaper. Traditional media businesses aren’t growing as fast as they used to, and all the major entertainment conglomerates are quietly assessing how, or if, they should offload parts of their business. It’s a growing list that now includes prize targets CBS, ESPN and CNN as well as Sony Pictures.

Look at ESPN, for example, which has been contending with softer ratings, translating to fewer ad dollars and less in carriage fees from cable and telecom operators.

CBS executives have been looking to tie up with a tech giant for a few years, according to sources. They know growth isn’t going to sustain in the traditional TV ecosystem since fewer people sign up for pay-TV subscriptions. More on that here.

In fact, all TV networks have come under pressure since their business is built around getting paid per TV subscriber, and there are fewer subscribers every year.

Also, movie studios have generally fallen out of favor by their parent companies — they’re fickle revenue beasts, often the least predictable business unit in the house.

In the case of Sony, it fell to fifth place among movie studios last year with less than $1 billion in box office sales — just a few years after scoring second place in 2012 with more than $1.8 billion.

Sony Pictures may not be the answer. But there’s something real in Peak TV, the idea promulgated by FX president John Landgraf that the explosion in original TV shows — thanks to Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, etc. — now makes it harder for good shows to stand out.

That only underscores the priority behind owning content studios. The rise in programming from Amazon and Netflix and now possibly Apple and Google means Silicon Valley is just recreating the machine Hollywood created.

There are already good studios in the system. No need to reinvent them, if they’re already available.

* Here’s the math: Since Paramount generates about $2.6 billion a year, only a third of Sony Pictures, that $10 billion value suggests a multiple of 3.8 times its sales. Sony Pictures’ approximately $8 billion in revenue would imply a deal value of $30 billion. Lots of caveats here, given Sony was hacked and it fell to fifth place in the studio rankings. That said, it also potentially shows why Sony CEO Kaz Hirai would unload the unit.

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
: EDU +2.3%, UNH +0.5%, .

M&A news:
  • CWEI +32% ( to be acquired by Noble Energy (NBL) for approx value of $139 per share), LUX +8.2% (Essilor and Delfin sign agreement of merger through a combination of Essilor (ESLOY) and Luxottica), RAI +4% (British American Tobacco (BTI) to acquire RAI common stock it does not currently own for $59.64 per share)
Select metals/mining stocks trading higher: KGC +4.8%, AU +4.7%, SBGL +4.5%, PAAS +3.7%, GG +3.4%, ABX +3.1%,NEM +3%, SLW +2.8%, GFI +1.7%

Other news:
  • BVXV +27.5% (still checking), BLRX +8.9% (initiaties a second Phase 2a trial investigating BL-8040 in combination with KEYTRUDA for Pancreatic Cancer), MUX +5.5% (reports FY16 production in-line with guidance), AG +4.4% (reports 2016 production +16%), IAG +4.3% (reports Q4 production above guidance), HMY +3.2% (reports H1 gold production rose 8% YoY),RIO +1.8% (reports Q4 production; iron ore shipments in-line with guidance)
Analyst comments:
  • LAMR +1.1% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman), NFLX +1% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Mizuho), AXP +0.6% (upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan), DIS +0.5% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman)

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
:
  • CBK -16.2%, TIF -4.7%, PLG -3.9%
M&A news:
  • NBL -0.5% (to acquire CWEI for $139 per share)
Other news:
  • ADHD -52.6% (reports that the Phase 3 clinical trial of MDX in adults with ADHD missed the primary endpoint)
  • GLBS -26.1% (announced that its previously disclosed private placement/conversion of debt will not occur as planned (previously described on November 28, 2016))
  • UEC -11.9% (confirms underwritten public offering of units of the company at price of $1.50/unit)
Analyst comments:
  • VOD -2.7% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at HSBC)
  • NVS -1.6% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Berenberg)
  • CMG -1.4% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan)
  • TWTR -1.1% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at UBS)
  • NAVI -1.1% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan )
  • ING -1% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman)