>>> US Revlon reports net sales decreased 5.3% y/y on a pro forma basis to $645.

Revlon reports net sales decreased 5.3% y/y on a pro forma basis to $645.7 mln; Reports adjusted net loss of ($24.7 mln) compared to net income of $13 mln in prior year period (17.75)
  • As Reported net sales were $645.7 million in the second quarter of 2017, an increase of 32.1% compared to the prior-year period, driven by the acquisition of Elizabeth Arden. On a Pro Forma basis, net sales decreased by 5.3%, or 3.9% XFX, as declining consumption in core beauty categories in the North America mass retail channel more than offset strong international growth. On a brand basis, net sales growth in Revlon color cosmetics and Elizabeth Arden products was more than offset by sales declines in Almay, SinfulColors, CND and American Crew.
  • As of June 30, 2017, the Company had drawn $87.5 million on its Revolving Credit Facility and had over $300 million of liquidity, consisting of $83.2 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, as well as $231 million in available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company has taken steps to improve its domestic liquidity position, such as repatriating cash to the U.S. using tax-effective methods and effectively managing its working capital needs. Net cash used in operating activities in the first six months of 2017 was $139.2 million, compared to net cash used by operating activities of $51.9 million in the same period last year.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up:
  • PDLI +19.8%, YELP +19.5%, EPZM +16.9%, GPRO +16.3%, WTW +14.9%,ANET +13.8%, SPPI +13.2%, MDRX +11.4%, AJRD +9.1%, HDP +8.8%,ETSY +8.5%, CLMT +8.4%, CBB +8.3%, CFRX +7.7%, MX +7.4%, IOTS+7.1%, MTZ +7.1%, BLDR +6.6%, KND +6.6%, WING +6.3%, ASPN +6.3%,FIVN +6%, CARA +4.7%, WU +4.7%, UNVR +4.4%, ARWR +4.1%, KDMN+4%, GEVO +3.9%, ELY +3.8%, JONE +3.7%, CI +3.4%, NBIX +3.2%, OEC+3.2%, OEC +3.2%, VGR +3.1%, UNIT +2.8%, SRC +2.7%, SRCI +2.7%,AMC +2.6%, WTI +2.6%, PETX +2.6%, IRWD +2.2%, VRNS +2%, FSTR+2%, PGRE +1.9%, BRS +1.8%, GBT +1.5%, GSBD +1.5%, MCHP +1.4%,FFG +1.3%, BEP +1.3%, KHC +1.1%, CTRL +1.1%, CRC +1.1%, JOBS+1.1%, EPR +1%, TXMD +1%, MAIN +1%
Gapping down:
  • EFII -29.5%, AAOI -27.3%, CFMS -20.6%, ABTL -20%, PI -19.9%, NGVC-16.5%, CHUY -14.1%, SYNA -13.3%, FLR -13.1%, APLP -13%, MELI -11%,INFN -10.6%, DVAX -9.4%, BIO -8.9%, YRCW -8.6%, CARB -8.4%, VIAB-7.8%, INFI -7.4%, BGS -7.1%, NPTN -6.5%, APPN -6.4%, MEET -6.3%,OVAS -6%, VTL -5.1%, SMCI -4.8%, BNFT -4.6%, AXDX -4.3%, INTT-4.3%, AVID -4.2%, GST -4.1%, NE -4.1%, AG -3.9%, IPHI -3.8%, HBM-3.8%, ACLS -3.4%, LITE -3.1%, AAXN -3.1%, SM -3%, UEIC -2.8%, DGLY-2.7%, VVUS -2.7%, HTGC -2.5%, OCLR -2.3%, RLJ -2.3%, ACIA -2.1%,UE -1.9%, SWN -1.9%, BAS -1.7%, GRUB -1.6%, NYMT -1.6%, CERS-1.6%, CZR -1.6%, LOCO -1.5%, PBPB -1.4%, FNSR -1.2%, ATVI -1.1%,CLNE -1.1%, JUNO -1.1%, GSAT -1%

NY Post : Legendary oil trader forced to shutter hedge fund amid low prices

The oil trading “God” has spoken — and is said to be closing down his main hedge fund because he just can’t make a profit with such low-priced oil.

Low volatility and plummeting prices in crude helped contribute to a 30 percent decline in Andy Hall’s Astenbeck Fund this year through June 30.

While the tough market in oil is bad news for uber-traders like Hall, it is great news for American motorists, for example, who have seen low pump prices for months.

Legendary trader Hall, who earned the nickname “God” after earning $100 million in profits in 2008 thanks to perfectly timed oil trades, doesn’t see a quick turnaround in low crude prices on the horizon.

West Texas Intermediate crude closed Thursday at $49.03 a barrel — and except for a few days has traded below $60 since December 2014.

It is down 8.7 percent this year.

“It looks increasingly like oil prices will be range-bound for some time to come,” Hall wrote in a letter to investors last month, a copy of which was obtained by the Financial Times.

It is a humbling end for Hall’s main fund.

In 2008, the turmoil of the financial crisis made him a king on Wall Street. And why not? He already had his own castle in the German town of Astenbeck and 5,000 works of fine art — including Andy Warhol works — as proof of his oil trading prowess.

Soon after Hall left Citigroup, he reportedly raised $1 billion in 2010 for his new hedge fund: Astenbeck Capital Management.

But the last few years have not been quite so kind to commodities traders.

Hall’s decision to cut bait comes as the hedge fund’s flagship fund fell roughly 30 percent in the first half of the year, Bloomberg first reported, citing sources.

“The exit of Andy Hall is very concerning. He is only one of many funds that no longer feel the energy market is a good trading risk-reward value,” David Greenberg, former New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) board member told The Post.

“I don’t expect to see huge spikes in the $100-115 range again, barring a major event in the Mideast, in which we could see a short-term spike,” Greenberg said.

Goldman Sachs said on Wednesday that big oil companies have been able to adapt to the $50-range thanks in part to cost-cutting.

The low prices and low volatility make it tough for traders to quickly make up for losing bets.

“In the past you could be wrong but still trade around your position, and you could end up even,” Greenberg said.

“Now there’s a real lack of intraday volatility, which makes it harder for funds both short-term and long-term to sustain losses in their portfolio,” he said.

Reps for Astenbeck Capital Management declined to comment.

Hall did not respond to requests to comment.

(BAML) The Flow Show - The Apple of my High (no PDF)

The Apple of my High


Key takeaways

·        Flows this week: $7.3bn into bonds, $2.3bn into equities, $0.4bn into gold

·        YTD tech fund inflows on pace for record 18% AUM growth in 2017

·        Bull & Bear indicator at 7.6, forthcoming sell signal needs stronger EM inflows & reversal of HY outflows

 

Talking Points

Flows this week: $7.3bn into bonds, $2.3bn into equities, $0.4bn into gold.

3 highlights: risk-off in fixed income with inflows to Treasuries & IG, outflows from TIPS (biggest in 5 weeks) & HY; largest health care outflows in 6 months as US reform prospects diminish; US equity outflows contrast with inflows to RoW (YTD almost $100bn into Europe/Japan/EM vs flat flows to US).

Tech fund flows: YTD inflows to tech on pace for record 18% AUM growth in 2017 (Chart 2); tech follows EM debt as big inflow winner YTD (Chart 3Chart 2); but despite strong EPS growth (Chart 4) inflows to tech slowing (Chart 1).

Bull & Bear: BofAML Bull & Bear indicator at 7.6, below "sell signal" trigger of 8; BB indicator has triggered "sell" 11 times since 2002...backtest ofsell signals revealed in table below; forthcoming sell signal requires stronger EM inflows and reversal of recent HY outflows.

 

 

 

Table 1: Bull & Bear indicator historical "sell" signals

 

 

 

 

Global equities (MSCI ACWI)

EQ / HG

HY / GOV

10y swap sprd

 

Start date

End date

B&B

Max upside foregone*

Max (3m) drawdown

Max (2m) drawdown

Max (1m) drawdown

Cross asset: Max (3m) drawdown

 

 

4/23/2002

4/30/2002

8.1

0.0%

-21.5%

-8.8%

-3.4%

-24.3%

-15.4%

-11.8ppt

 

1/14/2004

2/10/2004

8.1

1.3%

-6.6%

-4.3%

-2.4%

-6.6%

-3.6%

-14.2ppt

 

1/25/2006

5/15/2006

8.0

9.3%

-10.4%

-10.4%

-9.5%

-6.7%

-0.5%

-6.0ppt

 

12/29/2006

3/5/2007

8.0

3.8%

-6.4%

-6.4%

-6.4%

-7.2%

-2.0%

-10.7ppt

 

10/31/2007

11/8/2007

8.0

0.0%

-17.8%

-8.6%

-8.6%

-22.5%

-11.2%

-18.7ppt

 

10/21/2009

12/1/2009

8.0

1.1%

-7.3%

-5.3%

-5.3%

-7.0%

-1.6%

-8.0ppt

 

4/7/2010

5/18/2010

8.7

2.1%

-16.3%

-16.0%

-15.0%

-19.3%

-9.1%

-16.5ppt

 

10/20/2010

12/14/2010

8.3

3.7%

-5.8%

-5.8%

-5.8%

-5.0%

-3.2%

-12.0ppt

 

4/19/2011

5/26/2011

8.0

4.9%

-16.8%

-8.5%

-5.9%

-19.9%

-9.7%

-16.1ppt

 

3/13/2012

4/3/2012

8.1

1.1%

-13.6%

-11.3%

-4.9%

-16.6%

-6.9%

-16.7ppt

 

1/9/2013

3/12/2013

8.6

4.2%

-2.3%

-2.3%

-2.3%

-3.7%

-1.6%

-18.8ppt

 

Backtested Median

2.9%

-12.0%

-8.5%

-5.9%

-11.9%

-5.3%

-13.1ppt

 

Actual Median

2.1%

-2.3%

-2.3%

-2.3%

-3.7%

-1.6%

-18.8ppt

 

* Upside return measured from start date of "Greed" signal to market peak. Backtesting is hypothetical in nature and reflects application of the screen prior to its introduction. It is not intended to be indicative of future performance. Past performance should not and cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance. The table above presents backtested (shaded) and actual (unshaded) performance of the‎ indicator. There has only been one actual "sell" signal since 2013 and global equity market rallied another 4.2%‎ before a modest 2.3% drawdown.
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Investment Strategy

 

Asset Class Flows (Table 2)

 

Equities: 8 straight weeks of inflows ($2.3bn; $6.8bn into ETFs, $4.5bn outflows from mutual funds)

Bonds: 20 straight weeks of inflows ($7.3bn)

Precious metals: first inflows in 5 weeks ($0.4bn)

 

Table 2:  Global asset class flows, $mn   

 

Wk % AUM

YTD

YTD %AUM

 

Equities

0.0%

197,137

2.5%

 

ETFs

0.2%

261,153

10.2%

 

LO

-0.1%

-64,019

-1.2%

 

Bonds

0.2%

236,528

5.9%

 

Commodities

-0.2%

6,845

4.4%

 

Money-market

0.5%

-27,746

-0.8%

 

* week of 8/2/17; Source: BofAML Global Investment Strategy, EPFR Global 

 

 

Fixed Income Flows (Chart 5)

32 straight weeks of IG bond inflows ($5.8bn)

Outflows from HY bond funds 6 of past 7 weeks ($0.7bn)

27 straight weeks of inflows to EM debt funds ($1.9bn)

Inflows to muni funds 8 of past 9 weeks ($0.1bn)

Inflows to bank loan funds 3 of past 4 weeks ($0.1bn)

First outflows from TIPS funds in 5 weeks ($0.3bn)

First inflows to govt/tsy funds in 3 weeks ($0.2bn)

Equity Flows (Table 3)

US: 7 straight weeks of outflows ($2.7bn)

EM: 20 straight weeks of inflows ($2.2bn)

Japan: inflows 7 of past 8 weeks ($0.8bn)

Europe: inflows 18 of past 19 weeks ($1.3bn)

By style: US value fund outflows 14 of past 15 weeks ($0.3bn), outflows from US growth ($1.6bn), first inflows to US small caps in 7 weeks ($1.7bn)

By sector:  inflows to financials ($0.1bn), real estate($0.3bn); outflows from tech ($0.1bn), materials ($0.6bn), energy ($30mm), utilities ($0.1bn), healthcare ($0.9bn, largest in 27 weeks), consumer($0.6bn)

 

Table 4: The Asset Class Quilt of Total Returns

 

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017*

Commodities
31.8%

US Fixed Inc.
8.3%

Commodities
25.9%

MSCI EM
56.3%

REITS
32.0%

MSCI EM
34.5%

REITS
37.5%

MSCI EM
39.8%

US Treasuries
14.0%

MSCI EM
79.0%

Gold
29.2%

US Treasuries
9.8%

REITS
23.8%

S&P 500
32.4%

S&P 500
13.7%

S&P 500
1.4%

S&P 500
12.0%

MSCI EM
48.5%

US Treasuries
13.4%

US Treasuries
6.7%

Gold
25.6%

MSCI EAFE
39.2%

MSCI EM
26.0%

Commodities
21.4%

MSCI EM
32.6%

Gold
31.9%

US Fixed Inc.
4.5%

MSCI EAFE
32.5%

MSCI EM
19.2%

Gold
8.9%

MSCI EM
18.6%

MSCI World
27.4%

REITS
11.7%

US Treasuries
0.8%

Commodities
11.8%

MSCI EAFE
33.4%

US Fixed Inc.
11.7%

Cash
4.4%

US Treasuries
11.6%

MSCI World
33.8%

MSCI EAFE
20.7%

Gold
17.8%

MSCI EAFE
26.9%

Commodities
16.2%

Gold
4.3%

REITS
31.7%

Commodities
16.8%

US Fixed Inc.
7.8%

MSCI EAFE
17.9%

MSCI EAFE
23.3%

US Fixed Inc.
6.3%

US Fixed Inc.
0.6%

MSCI EM
11.2%

MSCI World
25.4%

REITS
8.5%

Gold
-0.7%

US Fixed Inc.
10.3%

REITS
33.5%

MSCI World
15.2%

MSCI EAFE
14.0%

Gold
23.2%

MSCI EAFE
11.6%

Cash
2.1%

MSCI World
30.8%

REITS
15.9%

S&P 500
2.1%

MSCI World
16.5%

REITS
0.7%

US Treasuries
6.0%

Cash
0.1%

Gold
8.6%

S&P 500
20.7%

Cash
6.2%

MSCI EM
-2.4%

Cash
1.8%

S&P 500
28.7%

S&P 500
10.9%

REITS
10.7%

MSCI World
20.7%

MSCI World
9.6%

Commodities
-35.6%

S&P 500
26.5%

S&P 500
15.1%

Cash
0.1%

S&P 500
16.0%

Cash
0.1%

MSCI World
5.5%

MSCI EAFE
-0.8%

MSCI World
7.5%

Gold
17.5%

Gold
-5.4%

REITS
-7.8%

REITS
-2.4%

Commodities
23.9%

Commodities
9.1%

MSCI World
10.0%

S&P 500
15.8%

US Treasuries
9.1%

S&P 500
-37.0%

Gold
25.0%

MSCI World
12.3%

MSCI World
-5.0%

Gold
8.3%

US Fixed Inc.
-2.2%

Gold
0.1%

MSCI World
-0.9%

US Fixed Inc.
2.6%

REITS
13.1%

S&P 500
-9.1%

S&P 500
-11.9%

MSCI EM
-6.0%

Gold
19.9%

Gold
4.6%

S&P 500
4.9%

Cash
4.9%

US Fixed Inc.
7.0%

MSCI World
-40.3%

Commodities
18.9%

MSCI EAFE
8.2%

REITS
-9.4%

US Fixed Inc.
4.5%

MSCI EM
-2.3%

Cash
0.0%

REITS
-3.4%

REITS
1.3%

US Fixed Inc.
5.8%

MSCI World
-12.9%

MSCI World
-16.5%

MSCI EAFE
-15.7%

US Fixed Inc.
4.1%

US Fixed Inc.
4.7%

Cash
3.1%

US Fixed Inc.
4.4%

S&P 500
5.5%

MSCI EAFE
-43.1%

US Fixed Inc.
6.1%

US Fixed Inc.
6.8%

MSCI EAFE
-11.7%

US Treasuries
2.2%

US Treasuries
-3.3%

MSCI EM
-1.8%

Gold
-10.4%

US Treasuries
1.1%

US Treasuries
4.0%

MSCI EAFE
-14.0%

Commodities
-19.5%

MSCI World
-19.5%

US Treasuries
2.3%

US Treasuries
3.5%

US Treasuries
2.8%

US Treasuries
3.1%

Cash
5.0%

REITS
-50.2%

Cash
0.2%

US Treasuries
5.9%

Commodities
-13.3%

Cash
0.1%

Commodities
-9.5%

MSCI EAFE
-4.5%

MSCI EM
-14.9%

MSCI EAFE
1.0%

Cash
0.6%

MSCI EM
-30.6%

MSCI EAFE
-21.2%

S&P 500
-22.1%

Cash
1.1%

Cash
1.3%

US Fixed Inc.
2.6%

Commodities
2.1%

REITS
-10.0%

MSCI EM
-53.2%

US Treasuries
-3.7%

Cash
0.1%

MSCI EM
-18.2%

Commodities
-1.1%

Gold
-27.3%

Commodities
-17.0%

Commodities
-24.7%

Cash
0.3%

Commodities
-9.8%

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Investment Strategy, Bloomberg; * 2017 annualized returns

 

(TechCrunch) Edge computing could push the cloud to the fringe

Edge computing could push the cloud to the fringe

Peter Levine, a general partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, has an interesting working theory. He believes that cloud computing is soon going to take a back seat to edge computing — and we will very quickly see the majority of processing taking place at the device level.

As crazy as that sounds — and he fully recognizes that it does — Levine says it’s based on sound analysis of where he sees computing going — and he believes his job as an investor is to recognize where the industry is heading before it happens.
He theorizes that as devices like drones, autonomous cars and robots proliferate, they are going to require extremely rapid processing — so fast, in fact, that sending data up to the cloud and back to get an answer will simply be too slow.
When you consider that it’s taken the better part of a decade for most companies to warm to the idea of going to the cloud, Levine is saying that we are already about to supplant it and move onto the next paradigm.
That’s not to say that the cloud won’t continue to have a key place in the computing ecosystem. It will. But if Levine is right, its role is about to change fairly dramatically, where it will be processing data for machine learning purposes, acting as an adjunct to more immediate data processing needs.
Levine isn’t alone in this thinking by any means. Other companies are beginning to recognize this, too, and we could be about to witness a massive computing shift just as we’ve begun to get used to the previous one.
I feel like we’ve been here before
If the idea of processing data at the edge sounds familiar, it should. Levine points out computing has gone in massive cycles, shifting from centralized to distributed and back again, and the coming move to the edge is just another manifestation of that.
Photo: Peter Levine
In his view, it only makes sense that the next trend will swing back to a distributed system driven by the sheer volume of Internet of Things devices. When the number of devices on the planet is no longer limited by the number of humans, it has the potential to raise the number of computers in the world by an order of magnitude, and that will force a change in the way we think about computing in the future.
Levine says we are at the very beginning of this change, as we start to see the development of autonomous cars and drones, but he sees a future where this will eventually lead to the on-going proliferation of an abundance of smart devices — and it’s going to happen quickly.
Processing massive amounts of data
As Levine puts it, “Think about a self-driving car, it’s effectively a data center on wheels, and a drone is a data center with wings and a robot is a data center with arms and legs and a [ship] is a floating data center…” He adds, “These devices are processing vast amounts of information and that information needs to be processed in real time.” What he means is that even the split-second latency required to pass information between these systems and the cloud simply takes too long.
Think about a self-driving car, it’s effectively a data center on wheels.
— Peter Levine

If a car needs to a make decision, it needs the information instantly and no amount of latency is going to be acceptable.
Danielle Merfeld, VP at GE Global Research, says her company faces a similar kind of issue. GE makes huge machines like locomotives and gas turbines, generating tons of information, and they realized a few years ago, as the sensors on these massive machines generated ever-more data, it was going to require processing on the device itself at the edge, while moving only the most valuable data to the cloud for machine learning purposes.
Each machine leaves data exhaust, and if they share the best data in the cloud, and deliver it back to each individual machine, they can begin learning from one another in this virtuous cycle of data creation, processing and recirculation.

I feel the need for speed
Deepu Talla, VP and GM at Nvidia, the company that’s making GPU chips that are helping fuel AI and robotics, says there are a number of reasons companies move to the edge, but it starts with a need for speed and pure practicality.
Talla says it’s not just big machines that Merfeld and Levine are talking about. For some Internet of Things devices, like connected video cameras, it also ceases to be practical to send the data to the cloud just because of the pure volume involved.
As an example, he points out that there are already a half a billion connected cameras in place today with a billion expected to be deployed worldwide by 2020. As he says, once you get over 1080p quality, it really ceases to make sense to send the video to the cloud for processing, at least initially, especially if you are using the cameras in a sensitive security zone like an airport where you need to make decisions fast if there is an issue.
Then there’s latency. Talla echoes Levine’s thinking here, saying machines like self-driving cars and industrial robots need decisions in fractions of seconds, and there just isn’t time to send the data to the cloud and back.
He adds that sometimes there are privacy issues where data could be considered too sensitive to send to the cloud and might remain on the device. Finally, companies may want to keep data at the edge because of a lack of bandwidth. If you are dealing with a location where you can’t stream data, that would mean having to process it at the edge. There wouldn’t be a choice.
AWS and Microsoft have noticed
AWS and Microsoft are always looking for what’s coming next, so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the biggest public cloud providers have some products aimed toward the edge market already. For AWS, it’s a product called Greengrass, which is providing a set of compute services directly on IoT devices when public cloud resources aren’t available for whatever reason.
For Microsoft, it’s Azure Stack, which offers a set of public cloud services inside a data center, giving a customer public cloud-like resources at the data center level without having to move it back and forth from the public cloud.
It’s only a matter of time before we see other vendors and whole new companies begin to offer their own take on edge computing
What does it all mean?
In fact, if this change happens as Levine predicts, he thinks it’s going to have a profound impact on computing as we know it. He believes it will require new ways of programming, securing and storing data, and will change how we think about machine learning. “Every area of the compute stack gets upended as we see centralized computing come back,” he said. That would represent a tremendous opportunity for both startups and VCs — especially those that get in early.
And just as we saw companies ahead of the cloud and mobile curve a decade ago, Levine says he is starting to see companies planting seeds in this area. “After this video and blog series went out, we’ve seen companies come in, and I didn’t know they existed, and they are pitching me,” he told TechCrunch in an interview.
As we’ve seen, no form of computing ever quite goes away when a new one comes along. IBM is still selling mainframes. There are client/server networks inside many organizations across the world today and mobile/cloud will still exist, if and when Levine’s vision comes to pass. But it could change how we think about computing, how we build computers and how we write programs.
Levine firmly believes that the time to start thinking about this is right now, before the change takes hold. After we are in the middle of it, the best ideas will already have been taken and it will be too late.

>>> Europe Pre Market

CS
ALD Int M/P Total fleet inline and guidance reiterated
Andritz -4-5% Sales 6.5% light, revised sales forecast lower
Easyjet +0.5% Traffic stats - load factor 96.8% vs 95.8% in July
Erste +1-2% Q2 NI E362.5m est E339.6m, beat driven by lower loan loss
Gas Nat +1-2% Announced disposal of a minority stake in gas distro biz
Gea Group +3-5% Oliver Capital said in statement its stake reached 3.002%
Harg Lans -5% FCA intends to reassess capital requirements
Lonza M/P Acquires Micro-Macinazione
M&C +1-2% PBT £64m vs our ests £55m, driven by property gains
Merlin Ent +2-3% PBT inline and LFL's fine
Miners UNCH Copper +0.15%, Brent -1.55%, Iron Ore +0.40%, China +0.10%
Munich Re -1-2% Negative read from Swiss Re's numbers
Pearson +2-3% H1 op profit 107m vs 65m, Outlook for 2017 unchanged
RBS +2-3% Revenues and provisions ahead, balance sheet strengthens
Swiss Re -3% H1 Group Net Income 10% below cons, higher losses
Tod's +2% H1 sales inline, EBITDA inline

MainFirst Pre Mkt Indications


*MEDIOBANCA-Q4 Rev 538.8m(548.8),NI 136.3m(112),Div 37c(31)........+1%

*SWISS RE-Prem's 18.15b(18.4),Net 1.2b(1.34),mkt remains tough.....-4%

*TOD'S-H1 Rev 483m(482.5),NI 34.7m(34.7),Ebitda 75.7m(76.07).......-2%

*INTERROLL-H1 Ebit 20.5m(23.7),Sales 203.3m(198.9),Ebitda 29.6m....+1%

*VICAT-Sales 1.25b(1.24),Ebitda 188m(198),Ebit 86m(98),upbeat FY...-1%

*GAS NAT-To sell 20% of Spain distrib unit for €1.5bln.............+0.5%

*AXEL SPRINGER-ABB via Bofa,from Gen Atlantic,2.23m shs @ €54.5....-2%

*ADIDAS-Skechers losses bid to dismiss Adidas tradedmark claims....+0.25%

*ANDRITZ-Rev 1.39b(1.5),Net Inc 68.7m(68.5),Ebita 109.9m(98.5).....-1%

*ERSTE-NI 362.5m(339.6),Rev 1.68b(1.66),NII 1.09b(1.07),OP 690m....+1%

*GEA-Albert Frere & Desmarais disclose 3% stake,ADR +2.5%,SI 10%...+5%

*LONZA-Acquires Micro-Macinazione,no financials disclosed..........U/C

*ALLIANZ-Q2 Rev 30b(28.79),OP 2.93b(2.68),P&C Prems 11.7b..........+0.5%

*EASYJET-12m passengers 78.8m,Load Factor 92.2%,July 8.1m/96.8%....+1%

*CBK-Govt may sell stake after elections own 15.45%,SI 1.4%........-0.25%


Shore


PEARSON - H1 op pft 107m.Divi 5p.Outlook for 2017 remains unchanged.........+1%


MERLIN - Sees Fy profits in line with current expectations..................UNCH


RBS - Op pft 1.69b.Retains 2017 guidance.To be profitable in 2018...........+1%


RPS - strong H1 results,sees FY modestly exceeding mkt expectations.........+5%


EASYJET - July passengers +8.9%,load factor +1.1pp..........................UNCH


MILL' & COP' - RevPar+15.9%.PBT+12.5%,profit pressure on NY and N.Asia op's.-1%


FBD - written premiums +4.9%,PBT €11.9m swings to back in the black.NAV 688c.+2%


YOUGOV - FY trading now seen to be ahead of previous expectations...........+8%


HARG.LANSDOWN - increased capital requirements by FCA,no special divi.......-5%