>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & downgrades - 5th of July 2021

>>> Up
* Flutter Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank; PT 16,257 pence
* Harbour Energy PLC Raised to Add at Peel Hunt; PT 472 pence
* Legrand Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank; PT 102 euros
* Rexel Raised to Add at AlphaValue
* Stagecoach Raised to Hold at HSBC; PT 95 pence
* Workspace Raised to Neutral at Kempen & Co; PT 880 pence

>>> Down
* Argan Cut to Neutral at Kempen & Co; PT 110 euros
* IMI Cut to Neutral at Goldman; PT 1,700 pence
* Stillfront PT Cut to 110 kronor from 150 kronor at Berenberg
* TAG Immobilien Cut to Neutral at Kempen & Co; PT 27.20 euros

>>> Initiation
* Foresight Group Rated New Buy at Peel Hunt; PT 470 pence

>>> Call
* Harbour Energy Upgraded on Higher Crude Assumptions: Peel Hunt

>>> What to look at today - 5th of July 2021

Asian stocks were steady Monday after U.S. equities extended a rally on speculation the Federal Reserve has scope to continue providing substantial stimulus support. Oil dipped amid OPEC+ tension.
Shares slipped in Japan and Hong Kong, and fluctuated in China, where cybersecurity probes into ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing as well as some other online platforms highlighted Beijing’s push to curb the influence of the nation’s internet companies. Chinese technology firms fell in Hong Kong.
The S&P 500 reached a record for a seventh day Friday after a U.S. jobs report signaled the economy is gaining steam but not at a pace that would prompt the central bank to taper stimulus quickly. U.S. equity contracts edged down. U.S. stock and bond markets are closed for the July 4 Independence Day holiday.
Oil was around $75 a barrel amid an OPEC+ dispute. The standoff between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates leaves the global economy guessing how much oil it will get next month.

Nikkei -0.58% Hang Seng -0.62% CSI -0.51% Shanghai -0.11% Shenzen +0.04%

Eur$ 1.1860 CNH 6.4656 CNY 6.4623 JPY 111.10 GBP 1.3824 CHF 0.9218 RUB 73.3578 TRY 8.6832 WTI$ 75.08 -0.11% Hold 1,788.40 +0.06% BTC 34,150 -1320 ETH 2260 -95

S&P -0.17% Nasdaq -0.14% EuroStoxx -0.07% FTSE +0.18% Dax -0.04% SMI +0.05%

Macro :
- Investors Don’t See End to Record-Breaking Equity Rally Just Yet
- OPEC+ Crisis Deepens as Saudi Arabia Refuses to Budge
- Polar Asset Trader Charged With $3.6 Million Fraud Scheme
- Germany’s Scholz Sees Holdouts Eventually Backing Tax Deal
- Merkel Bloc Widens Lead Over Green Party in German Election Poll

Spacs :
- Apollo Is Said to Plan Its First European SPAC IPO in Amsterdam
- SPAC Spartan Dips After Seeking to Boost Shares in Tie-Up Deal

Keep an eye on :
- AIR FP : Boeing 737 Freighter Ditches Off Hawaii Coast; Crew Rescued
- ALO FP : Norway’s KLP Exits Motorola, Alstom on West Bank Settlement Ties
- CAST SS : Castellum Buys Kielo for ~SEK 6.5B from Blackstone, Brunswick
- CSGN SW : Credit Suisse Head of Asset Management in Spain Exits
- ROO LN : Deliveroo Surges as Short Interest Rises, JPMorgan Hikes Target
- DTE GY : Deutsche Telekom Said to Start $5.3 Billion Dutch Unit Sale
- DIGS LN : GCP Student Living Confirms Receipt of Non-Binding Proposals
- EQT SS : Sweden’s EQT Fund Buys U.S.-Based Cypress Creek Renewables
- ESKN LN : Esken Gets GBP125m Carlyle Convertible Loan to Help Fund LSA
- KCR FH : Cargotec and Konecranes Deal Gets EU Probe Over Antitrust Issues
- LAND SW : Landis+Gyr in 20-Year Pact With National Grid for Smart Meters
- MITRA BB : Mithra to Exercise 2nd Put Option in Share Deal With LDA Capital
- MRW LN : Fortress Agrees to Buy Morrison for About $8.7 Billion in Cash
- NWG LN : EU Clears NatWest, Natixis to Participate in Recovery Bond Sales
- NHY NO : Norsk Hydro Asa: Hydro agrees to sell Hydro Precision Tubing Lichtervelde plant to Aurelius Group
- NYR BB : Nyrstar: Court Suspends Probe, Orders Claimants to Provide Proof
- OCDO LN : U.K. Grocer Ocado Is Seen Many Years Away from a Profit: Chart
- RDM SM : Apollo Global to Buy 67% in RDM for EU1.45/Share; Eyes Delisting (1.45 cvs 1.418 Friday Close)
- 9984 JP : Revolut, SoftBank Fund in Talks on Fundraising, Sky Reports
- ALSPT FP : Spartoo Sells EU23.7 Million of New Shares in Paris IPO
- AM3D GY : SLM Calls Convertible Bondholder Vote on Conversion Date
- STLA IM : Stellantis to Announce Plan to Make E-Vans in U.K., FT Says
- TIV DC : Tivoli Sees 2021 Revenue of About DKK600 Mln Amid Reopening
- TTE FP : Qatar to Buy South African Oil-Block Stakes From TotalEnergies
- TTE FP : TotalEnergies to Forgo Palm Oil From 2023, CEO Tells La Provence
- TRYG DC : Tryg Raises FY Technical Result to Range of DKK3.5-3.8B
- VOW3 GY : Audi Seeks to Double Return on Sales by 2025: Der Spiegel
- WIEN AV : Wienerberger Boosts FY Adjusted Ebitda View, Misses Est.
- WG/ LN : Wood Group to Pay SFO $142 Million to Settle Bribery Case

WSJ : China Widens Data-Security Probe of U.S.-Listed Tech Companies

China Widens Data-Security Probe of U.S.-Listed Tech Companies
Reviews follow a similar move against ride-hailing giant Didi

A unit of China’s cybersecurity regulator launched data-security reviews of apps operated by two U.S.-listed Chinese companies, days after announcing a similar probe into ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc.

The latest action targets two truck-hailing apps operated by Full Truck Alliance Co. YMM 2.26% and an online recruiting app owned by Kanzhun Ltd. BZ -2.13% Both companies went public in the U.S. in June. Like Didi, they were ordered to stop adding users while the probes are conducted.

On Monday, China’s Cybersecurity Review Office, which falls under the Cyberspace Administration of China, said it had begun a data-security investigation into the apps Yunmanman, Huochebang and Boss Zhipin. It said the review is aimed at preventing national data-security risks, maintaining national security and protecting public interests.

Shares in SoftBank Group Corp. 9984 -5.26% , whose Vision Fund owns stakes in Didi Global and Full Truck Alliance, fell 5.3% in Monday trading on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The Hang Seng tech index, a gauge of Hong Kong-listed technology stocks that is dominated by large Chinese companies such as Tencent Holdings Ltd. , fell 1.8%.

Didi raised $4.4 billion in its initial public offering last week, while Full Truck Alliance raised $1.6 billion and Kanzhun raised $912 million earlier in June, according to regulatory filings. Prices of their American depositary receipts all rose above their IPO prices upon their trading debuts, though Didi’s New York-listed securities dropped 5.3%on Friday after the recent regulatory action.

Full Truck Alliance, also known as Manbang Group, provides Uber-like services for China’s trucking industry and was formed in 2017 from the merger of Yunmanman and Huochebang. The two digital platforms connect millions of truckers with companies that need to ship a variety of goods.

Its shares started trading on the New York Stock Exchange on June 22. As of Friday, Full Truck Alliance had a market capitalization of about $20.65 billion. The company is based in Guiyang, in the southwestern province of Guizhou. Aside from SoftBank’s Vision Fund, its high-profile investors include Sequoia Capital China and Tencent.

Before it went public, Full Truck Alliance’s listing prospectus said the company was asked to share details with Chinese regulators on issues such as user protection, pricing and competition. It had warned that “there is no guarantee that such regulatory communications would not result in substantial penalties or orders” that could affect the company’s operations and growth prospects.

In May, Full Truck Alliance and Didi were among 10 transportation-technology companies that were summoned to a joint meeting with officials from eight Chinese ministries and agencies. The authorities discussed the companies’ arrangements with drivers, and their pricing and handling of freight information. They told the firms to rectify issues that had sparked public concerns.

Kanzhun, which is based in Beijing and counts Tencent among its shareholders, started trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market on June 11. The seven-year-old company operates Boss Zhipin—a mobile app that connects job seekers with employers and recruiting professionals, and describes itself as China’s largest online recruitment platform, with around 25 million monthly active users as of March.

The company also previously warned of potential regulatory action from Chinese authorities that could negatively affect its business. Such disclosures are relatively common for technology companies based in China.

Didi said Friday that it would fully cooperate with the cybersecurity review. Over the weekend, Chinese authorities ordered app store operators in the country to remove the mobile app for Didi’s China service. The company said its existing customers who had already downloaded the app wouldn’t be affected.

Full Truck Alliance and Kanzhun didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Monday

WSJ : The Case for and Against Investing in Emerging Markets Now

The Case for and Against Investing in Emerging Markets Now
Economic growth is expected to be relatively strong. But these stocks also carry risks.

Emerging-markets stocks have outpaced developed-market shares over the past 12 months, making them a tempting investment option. So is now a good time to take the plunge, or should investors stay away?

On the plus side, economic growth in emerging markets is expected to surpass growth in developed markets in the next few years. And emerging-markets stocks can be useful to U.S. investors for diversifying a portfolio, since they don’t move in lockstep with U.S. shares.

But emerging-markets shares come with higher volatility than developed-market stocks and an array of risks, including political risk, currency risk, liquidity risk—and economic risk, despite the rosy projections. And investors can get exposure to emerging markets more safely with a portfolio of U.S. stocks that includes companies doing business in those markets.

“Investing in emerging markets is a high-risk, high-reward proposition,” says Eswar Prasad, a trade-policy professor at Cornell University. “Many emerging markets have done well growth-wise, and their financial markets have had periods of success, but it tends not to last too long.”

With that in mind, here’s a closer look at the cases for and against investing in emerging markets now.

The positive case
The biggest advantage of emerging markets today is their potential for stronger economic growth than advanced economies, investment pros say.

“About 90% of the world’s population under 30 lives in emerging markets,” says Michael Sheldon, chief investment officer at RDM Financial Group, Hightower, a wealth-management firm in Westport, Conn. “This may lead to stronger labor-market growth, increased productivity and stronger GDP and corporate profits over time.”

In contrast, developed countries have rapidly expanding senior populations and low birthrates, which makes it more difficult to find workers to fill new jobs, says Karim Ahamed, investment strategist at Cerity Partners, a wealth-management firm in Chicago. That can limit economic growth.

The International Monetary Fund forecasts average annual GDP growth of 5.5% for emerging markets in 2021-23, compared with 3.5% for advanced economies.

Emerging markets also represent diversification opportunities for U.S. investors. That’s partly because economic growth and financial-market performance in emerging markets are less correlated with the U.S. than advanced economies and financial markets are. In addition, emerging markets give U.S. investors currency diversification, which can be helpful when the dollar is weak.

While investors can gain exposure to emerging markets through stocks of U.S. companies that earn revenue from those markets, those stocks won’t give investors the full diversification benefit, Prof. Prasad says.

The strong economic and corporate performance that is boosting emerging-markets stocks also makes their bonds attractive, says Robert Koenigsberger, chief investment officer at Greenwich, Conn.-based Gramercy Funds Management, which specializes in emerging markets.

Inflation is less of a problem in most major emerging markets today than it has been at times in the past. Also, emerging-markets countries’ external deficits generally have narrowed, or totally reversed in some cases. “This should give emerging-market central banks more flexibility to absorb external shocks and deal with post-pandemic inflationary pressures, allowing them to tighten monetary policy without slowing growth momentum too much,” Mr. Koenigsberger says.

The negative case
Emerging-markets stocks are more volatile than those in advanced economies. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index had a standard deviation of 18 over the past 10 years, compared with 14 for the MSCI World Index of developed markets, according to Morningstar. Standard deviation measures volatility, with a higher number representing more volatility.

The factors behind that higher volatility in emerging markets include political risk, economic risk, currency risk and liquidity risk.

And while emerging-markets economies generally have been on a sharp uptrend for years, some also have experienced serious downturns. Russia’s economy, for instance, shrank 2% in 2015, compared with 2.9% growth for the U.S. that year.

Emerging-markets currencies are a double-edged sword, providing diversification but also volatility. “When you try repatriating your investment, everything may be going wrong at the same time,” with the emerging market’s economy, financial markets and currency dropping together, Prof. Prasad says.

A declining emerging-market currency makes an investment less valuable when converted into dollars. And emerging-markets currencies aren’t only vulnerable to trouble in their own country—they also tend to decline against the dollar when the U.S. currency is gaining against other developed-market currencies like the euro or yen, regardless of what’s happening in emerging markets.

Meanwhile, market liquidity isn’t as deep in emerging markets as in advanced ones. “There’s always a risk with emerging markets: It’s easy to bring money in, but not always to take it out,” Prof. Prasad says.

On the bond side, corporate debt outstanding has soared 400% in emerging markets since 2010, Mr. Koenigsberger says. So, plenty of securities are available. But liquidity isn’t just about supply. “Due to fewer banks and smaller market-making operations at those banks, there is insufficient liquidity when investors look to exit the market” in many cases, he says.

Another issue for bond investors: “There are a handful of emerging-market countries—South Africa, Turkey and Brazil, for example—that face high debt levels and large current-account imbalances,” Mr. Sheldon says. These countries are vulnerable to capital flight, which could trigger a plunge in bond prices.

One negative factor for emerging markets in the near term is that countries such as India and Brazil are having trouble dealing with Covid-19. That will likely weigh on emerging-markets stocks this year, Mr. Ahamed says.

How to invest
For those who want to jump into emerging markets, what’s the best way? Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds will suit most investors better than individual stocks and bonds, because researching and trading individual securities in these markets is often difficult.

When it comes to the question of actively managed funds versus passive index funds, “you can make an argument for active management to provide some downside protection,” Mr. Ahamed says. “But an ETF gives you very broad-based exposure in a way that’s generally cost effective, with lower fees.” Most ETFs passively track a market index.

For bond funds, actively managed is the way to go, Mr. Koenigsberger says. The growth of emerging-markets debt amid continuing economic challenges in many countries puts a premium on active management to sort out the winners, he says. Emerging-markets bond indexes tracked by passive funds are usually weighted by market capitalization, so the most heavily indebted issuers have higher weightings. “Emerging-market debt isn’t an asset class that is suitable for index funds,” Mr. Koenigsberger says.

FT : Tesla’s entry to S&P 500 costs investors $45bn

Tesla’s entry to S&P 500 costs investors $45bn
Research suggests market cap-weighted indices have a tendency buy high and sell low

Tesla’s entry into the S&P 500 has cost investors tracking or benchmarked against the index of blue-chip US stocks more than $45bn since December.

The electric vehicle pioneer was already the world’s seventh-largest listed company when it was finally admitted to the S&P at the end of 2020 — more than a decade after entering some other indices such as the Russell 1000.

Its stock had rallied 764 per cent in the 12 months beforehand — partly in anticipation of forced buying on entry to the S&P 500 — and its market capitalisation equalled the total market cap of the nine largest automakers by sales volume, which between them accounted for 94 per cent of global sales in 2020, according to Research Affiliates, a Californian investment house.

Tesla’s share price then fell in the six months after its admission while the stock it replaced, Apartment Investment and Management (AIV), rallied 48 per cent.

This rebalance cost investors 41 basis points of their portfolios, said Rob Arnott, chair of RA, a tidy sum given that the S&P 500 is directly tracked by about $4.6tn of capital, with a further $6.6tn benchmarked against it.

“AIV outperformed Tesla by a stupendous margin,” Arnott said in a blog post. “A pensioner with a $100,000 allocation to the S&P 500 is about $410 poorer as the result of the December index rebalance. Unfortunately, this cost is totally unnoticed by investors because it is baked into the index’s performance.”


While Tesla is an extreme case, Research Affiliates’ analysis suggests market cap-weighted indices have a clear tendency to systematically “buy high, sell low” when they rebalance.

Since 2000, an average of 23 stocks have entered (and left) the S&P 500 each year, sometimes because of corporate action such as mergers, acquisitions or bankruptcy among existing constituents, on other occasions as a result of growth by companies outside the index.

RA found that 65 per cent of new entrants see their share prices rally between the day their impending admission is announced and the day that change becomes effective.

In contrast, 60 per cent of the discretionary deletions from the index fall between announcement and exit dates. On average, deletions underperformed additions by 6.2 percentage points over this period, plus a further 1 point on the day after the change is enacted as index trackers catch up.

Over the subsequent 12 months, prices move in the opposite direction: additions on average underperform the index, albeit by only 1 percentage point, but deletions beat it by an average of almost 20 points.


As a result, RA calculated that investors typically lose 20-40bp a year from “stocks [being] added at too high a price and sold at too low”, during the rebalancing process.

“Traditional indices embody built-in performance-dragging inefficiencies,” Arnott wrote. “The index rebalance is a great opportunity . . . to do the opposite of what the index does: buy the deletion and sell the addition.”

Arnott, whose business is a proponent of factor-based “smart beta” investment, said this was not a criticism of S&P per se, but rather a flaw inherent to all market cap-weighted indices.

Vitali Kalesnik, director of research for Europe at RA, said the rebalancing effect was likely to be exacerbated by hedge funds buying stocks when their impending promotion is announced in the full knowledge that index trackers such as ETFs will need to buy them when they enter the index.

“Who benefits from this? hedge funds and other liquidity providers. Who pays? The investors, a lot of which are pensioners that hold collectively billions of dollars in the S&P,” Kalesnik said. “This applies to all indices and strategies whenever any trading pattern becomes predictable and can be front run.”

While an annual loss of 20-40bp may not be huge, Kalesnik argued this “can be 10 times the stated management fee” for an index tracker, with investors often switching funds in order to save a fraction of this amount.

While indices have little option but to rebalance periodically, RA had some suggestions to lessen the impact.

Selecting additions based on their five-year average market cap can help avoid admitting “hot” stocks that prove to be temporary high-fliers, while banding can limit “flip-flop trades”, additions that are quickly reversed.

Kalesnik said any investor able to postpone trading of the S&P 500’s additions and deletions by a year “can outperform the index”.

Alternatively, tracking an index that represents the full universe of US large-cap stocks, rather than the “very narrow” S&P 500 avoids “entry point risk”, he argued.

Gareth Parker, a former director of index research and design at S&P, who has also worked with RA and is now chairman and chief indexing officer of Moorgate Benchmarks, believed that the selection methodology for the S&P 500, which includes the stipulation that a company should be profitable, was “not ideal”.

“It is essentially ‘active management’. They don’t follow objective, transparent rules.

“The result is anomalies such as adding Tesla, and from memory Google and Microsoft, far later than would have happened if the rules followed the normal approach of adding by size, subject to basic eligibility criteria,” Parker said.

However, he was unconvinced by arguments that market cap indices inherently “buy high and sell low” given that the S&P 500’s track record “is remarkably good when compared to active management, even before fees”.

Aye Soe, global head of product management at S&P Dow Jones Indices, said its data suggested what she termed the “index effect” had actually declined in the past decade, reducing rebalancing-related losses.

“Market cap-weighting is the only way to show proportional representation of assets in an aggregate way, it’s the only macro consistent way,” she added. “People criticise it, but if you look at active managers, most can’t beat it.”

FT : Alpine nimbyism freezes Swiss green energy dreams

Alpine nimbyism freezes Swiss green energy dreams
Risk that ‘Swexit’ may decouple country from EU power grid lends extra urgency to stalled renewables projects

High in the Swiss Alps, where even in mid-June there is snow, workers are installing photovoltaic panels across the face of Europe’s highest dam. 

Switzerland has long basked in its reputation for clean energy: helped by abundant hydropower, less than 10 per cent of the electricity it produces emits greenhouse gases. Yet today, Switzerland’s complex regulatory process and local objections to potential eyesores means new green projects such as at the Muttsee reservoir have become an exception.

As a result, one of the world’s wealthiest and most environmentally conscious societies is in danger of moving backwards. Switzerland is also about to become more dependent on imported energy, just as it faces the growing risk it may decouple from the EU’s electricity grid thanks to an increasingly fractious diplomatic tussle with Brussels.

The government is committed to shutting down the country’s three nuclear plants over the next decade or so. When that happens, Switzerland will lose a third of its current energy generation, and no one is sure how the shortfall will be made up.

“The idea of the project was really to try and show what is feasible,” said Christian Heierli, project leader for power company Axpo at the Muttsee AlpinSolar project. 

Axpo hopes the facility, built with 320 tonnes of material flown by helicopter to 2,500 metres above sea level, will showcase Switzerland’s solar potential.

“There are really only a very few large-scale [renewable] projects in Switzerland,” Heierli said. Getting permits to build solar and wind farms was almost impossible, he explained. “Apart from people installing PV panels on the rooves of their houses, not much else is happening.” 

Bern recognises it has a problem. Last year, Switzerland produced just 311kWh of energy per resident from solar and wind power, according to the Swiss Energy Foundation, a renewable energy think-tank. By comparison, Denmark produced 3027kWh, Germany 2232kWh and the UK 1304kWh. 

The potential for new hydroelectric plants, which account for 58 per cent of supplies, is small with upgrades to existing facilities only increasing output by marginal amounts, experts warn.

At the same time, Switzerland last month rejected long-running negotiations with Brussels over a new framework agreement to codify their sprawling net of bilateral treaties.

As a result, last Thursday, the first of several treaties governing Swiss connections to the EU energy market lapsed. Although there is only a remote chance Switzerland will be cut off from the EU’s grid unless a permanent deal with Brussels is struck, the country risks higher energy costs and uncertain supplies.

That would be particularly burdensome since Switzerland’s energy production is seasonal: in winter months, as rivers freeze, it depends more on energy imports to meet demand.

“We just don’t know how electricity exchange will work with the EU in five or 10 years time,” said Christian Schaffner, director of the energy science centre at ETH Zurich and a former senior official in the Swiss federal energy department. “It’s a big uncertainty.” 

Bulking up on domestically produced, renewable energy might help. Both solar and wind work well in winter, thanks to Switzerland’s geography. At the Axpo Muttsee project, for example, solar panels will produce 50 per cent more electricity per square metre than in the valley below. Colder temperatures improve efficiency, the snow reflects light back on to the panels and the site is often above the cloud line. Such features are common to many potential sites.

The country has the potential — in solar at least — to become a European leader. But without a more flexible regulatory environment, the opportunities for new projects are scant. 

“The regulatory framework has to be fundamentally adjusted in order to increase the expansion of renewable energies,” said Guido Lichtensteiger, a spokesman for Alpiq, one of Switzerland’s biggest power companies. 

Last month, Bern unveiled a package of proposed legislative changes to try and spark more renewable projects. For many, though, the proposals only tinkered with the problem and did little to properly address the country’s complex approval process, which is deeply rooted in Switzerland’s highly devolved political system.

A typical building project for a new power plant requires permission from Bern’s environmental and energy regulatory bodies, and then the same again from the government of the canton it is located in.

Communal building permissions are further required. As with all construction in Switzerland, a single individual can object. Legal wrangles can last years and are sometimes fought at great expense all the way to the Supreme Court. 

In October, the turbines finally began to turn on the Windpark Gotthardpass, one of Switzerland’s biggest renewable projects. But it took 18 years of negotiations to come to fruition.

In the 2017 national referendum to approve the government’s 2050 energy goals, Swiss voters strongly endorsed plans for more construction. Bern’s plans envisage building more than 850 wind turbines in the country over the next three decades. Currently, there are just 37.

But so far little has been achieved. Plans for four turbines in Kulmerau-Kirchleerau were recently scrapped after the local village rejected the proposals.

“Wealthy Switzerland is a stronghold of local opposition that is often explained as a federalist tradition,” wrote Zurich’s NZZ newspaper.

“A lot of the public [awareness] is not there,” added ETH’s Schaffner about the disconnect between Swiss support in principle on a national level and the local reality of new construction.

“[It] is interesting when you think . . . that we built all these dams in the Alps years ago, but now we don’t want to. You probably have to talk to a behavioural scientist to understand why that is.” 

FT : Emirates spearheads airline industry attack on credit card fees

Emirates spearheads airline industry attack on credit card fees
Dubai-owned carrier launches alternative payment scheme designed to avoid hefty charges

is leading a charge by airlines to escape the hefty payment processing fees levied by the credit card industry, after the carrier became the first to adopt a rival system developed by Deutsche Bank.

The Dubai-based carrier has implemented a long-delayed scheme for electronic real-time payments for tickets devised by the German lender on behalf of the International Air Transport Association, the airline industry’s trade body.

The scheme enables real-time payments from customers who book tickets on the Emirates website, with the money transferred directly to the carrier without the involvement of third-parties.

The aim for Emirates and other airlines is that customers opt to use it rather than pay with credit cards such as Visa and Mastercard.

Emirates does not disclose the share of payments it hopes to process via the new system. Between 60 and 70 per cent of all tickets sold by the Middle East carrier are paid with credit cards, while the remainder is cleared via country-specific payments options.

Airlines have to pay credit card companies between 1 and 3 per cent of the ticket price, with larger carriers closer to the lower end of that range, according to industry executives. By contrast, the system adopted by Emirates known as Iata Pay charges a fixed fee of just a few euro cents per transaction irrespective of the ticket price.

“For us, this is a huge difference,” Emirates chief financial officer Michael Doersam told the Financial Times, adding that fees to payment providers were one of the biggest components of its cost of sales.

Iata estimates that prior to the pandemic, airlines globally stumped up $8bn a year for the procession of payments to credit card firms and other external payments service providers.

For Deutsche Bank, Iata Pay is “a key strategic project”, according to Christof Hofmann, the bank’s global head of corporate and payment solutions.

The German lender, which two years ago promised to lower its dependence on volatile investment banking revenue, has identified payments processing as one of its growth markets. Stefan Hoops, head of Deutsche’s corporate bank, told the FT last year that it had the “highest strategic priority”.

The bank last month announced a joint venture with US fintech Fiserv to offer electronic payments services to small and medium sized companies in Germany. Other airlines are in talks over using the new scheme, according to Deutsche.

Emirates has dubbed the new payment system “Emirates Pay”, and Doersam said “we are already seeing the first transactions with Emirates Pay and are very satisfied.”

The carrier may eventually offer incentives for customers to use it — for instance, a bigger luggage allowance, a free upgrade to seats with more legroom, or even special fares that can only be booked using Emirates Pay.

However, Iata Pay has suffered from significant delays. The airline industry body hired Deutsche in early 2018 with a view to rolling it out by the end of that year. However, issues tied to the European open-banking regulations it is based on and the pandemic contributed to the delay.

“Now is the right time to launch it,” insisted Hofmann, pointing to the gradual recovery in air traffic and the easing of pandemic-related travel restrictions.

Iata told the FT that it was “pleased” to “offer this white label solution to airlines” but declined to comment further.

FT : Inflows into equity funds smash records

Inflows into equity funds smash records
Pace of flows, if sustained through 2021, will surpass past two decades combined

Investors are pouring into global equity funds with a fervour never seen before.

About $580bn has been added to the sector in the first half of 2021, putting the category on track for a record inflow, according to data provider EPFR.

Strategists with Bank of America estimate that if the pace of inflows continues at the same clip for the remainder of the year, equity funds will take in more money in 2021 than in the previous 20 years combined.

Equity funds have ploughed those inflows into an ever rising stock market, with major indices climbing to a series of record highs in the past week as the economic recovery from the pandemic gains momentum. The S&P 500 is up more than 15 per cent this year, while the FTSE all world index has gained slightly more than 12 per cent.

Relatively low bond yields — and the fact that more than $12tn-worth of debt trades with a yield below zero — have amplified the appeal of the $117tn global stock market.

“There been a real seismic change in the economy and where the earnings growth is coming from,” said Diane Jaffee, a portfolio manager with asset manager TCW. “Even with the most conservative estimates of inflation, your real return on bonds is negative.”


The inflows have been broad based, with large additions to both global funds as well as funds that buy US, Japanese or European stocks. Investors have in recent weeks also shown a preference for both growth and technology stocks in the US, as they debate how long inflation will remain elevated and whether the so-called reflation trade will continue to wobble.

Additions to sovereign bond funds have, by contrast, been relatively muted this year at $33bn, the EPFR data showed.

Jaffee said she expected investors to continue to favour stocks this year, particularly those in the US where the country has rolled out Covid-19 vaccinations at a much faster pace than most developed markets. But she and others have warned that a jolt to bond yields — for example from a policy mis-step by the US central bank — remain the big risk.

“While we’re at little risk of overtightening just now, the policy miscommunication issue is very much on the table,” said Nicholas Colas, the co-founder of DataTrek.

Colas noted that US stocks did well even in the aftermath of the 2013 taper tantrum, when the Federal Reserve chair prompted market volatility by saying the central bank would at some point curtail its bond-buying programme.

But Colas added: “While the 2013 taper tantrum period was fine for stocks, we can’t entirely discount the possibility that this time could be different.”

Fwd:(TEL) Morrisons Seeks to Win City Over to Fortress Deal



From: Nicolas Marmurek (OSCAR GRUSS & SON IN) At: 07/04/21 21:54:27
To: Laurent Chekroun (MAKOR SECURITIES PAR )
Subject: (TEL) Morrisons Seeks to Win City Over to Fortress Deal
DISCLAIMER

This information represents neither an offer to buy or sell any security nor, because it does not take into account the differing needs of individual clients, investment advice. Those seeking investment advice specific to their financial profiles and goals should contact their Oscar Gruss & Son Incorporated sales representative. Oscar Gruss & Son Incorporated believes this information to be reliable, but no representation is made as to accuracy or completeness. This information does not analyze every material fact concerning a company, industry, or security. Oscar Gruss & Son Incorporated assumes that this information will be read in conjunction with other publicly available data. Matters discussed here are subject to change without notice. There can be no assurance that reliance on the information contained here will produce profitable results. A security denominated in a foreign currency is subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which may have an adverse effect on the value of the security upon the conversion into local currency of dividends, interest, or sales proceeds. The value of securities and depositary receipts of foreign issuers that are denominated in United States dollars are also influenced by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. © 2020 Oscar Gruss & Son Incorporated. All rights reserved.