WSJ : Fidelity, Once Stodgy and Adrift, Bets on the Reddit Crowd

Fidelity, Once Stodgy and Adrift, Bets on the Reddit Crowd
Abby Johnson, a CEO some doubted, has lifted the firm’s profits while reshaping it for the generation of young investors spurred by the pandemic

Fidelity Investments Chief Executive Abigail Johnson, granddaughter of the financial behemoth’s founder, checks the pulse of the investing world from an unlikely place these days: Reddit’s stock-picking forums.

Not long ago, Fidelity appeared to some adrift and old-fashioned. Profits were down. Its mutual funds’ star stock pickers were losing clients. A firm that once stood as the world’s biggest money manager had slipped behind BlackRock Inc. and Vanguard Group. Some inside the family-controlled firm worried Ms. Johnson wasn’t bold enough to lead it.

Today, Ms. Johnson’s 75-year-old company has placed more bets than nearly any other big Wall Street firm on the future of cryptocurrencies and doubled down on other areas powered by individual investors—and the plan appears to be working.

Seven years into her tenure as CEO, Fidelity is more profitable than ever. It oversees $11 trillion in assets. That figure, which includes assets in Fidelity accounts as well as Fidelity funds held by other brokers’ clients, has more than doubled since Ms. Johnson took over. Fidelity’s individual accounts number more than 70 million, up nearly two-thirds since the end of 2014.


Ms. Johnson, 60, has remade Fidelity with a focus on giving a new generation of individual investors what they’re looking for. She spent heavily on expanding its customer-service workforce and building up tech platforms. She lowered fees on products most popular with small investors, in some cases undercutting Fidelity’s rivals.

Her efforts helped Fidelity ride the country’s biggest wave of new investors since the dot-com bubble. In the months after the 2020 pandemic lockdowns, many cooped up and bored Americans discovered stock-market trading. Since March 2020, customers have opened 12.7 million new retail Fidelity accounts.

Their enthusiasm has revived the brokerage industry and, at Fidelity, accelerated a shift away from the actively managed funds that had been the firm’s core business. Fidelity has arrived at a point where its most important assets no longer are star fund managers.

“Most of it was going to happen anyway,” Ms. Johnson said in an interview at Fidelity’s downtown Boston headquarters. “But what changed was people’s sense of how important it was.”

It can’t be known how durable the trading interest spurred by pandemic restrictions will prove, nor how the new generation of investors might respond to a prolonged market slump. Their faith in the markets could be tested this year, with volatile trading and the S&P 500 down more than 8% through Monday from its record close Jan. 3.

Many of the new investors are so far paying Fidelity little or no fees on the services they use. Ms. Johnson and her team are betting that some of them will stick with Fidelity for decades, and as they age and their financial needs grow more complicated, will turn to the firm for more-lucrative services such as advice.

Ms. Johnson’s path to chief executive was a winding one, delayed while her father, Edward (Ned) Johnson III, waited until he was 84 to cede his CEO role. The wait encouraged whispers by some Fidelity executives that she wasn’t ready. It wore on her, too.

After rising from analyst to running the asset-management business, Ms. Johnson in 2004 tried to force her father from his top position. The plan fizzled after he learned of it and issued enough stock to dilute his children’s ownership in the family business, people familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Johnson removed his daughter as head of the flagship investment-management division in 2005, during a tough stretch for its mutual funds that eroded confidence in her ability to take over the company someday. When he suggested her next role be running Fidelity’s foundation, she balked and raised the possibility of leaving, people familiar with the events said.

Mr. Johnson formed a succession committee, the people said, which would eventually anoint Ms. Johnson as Fidelity’s leader. In the meantime, she took over the business of managing retirement and benefits plans for companies, now known as Fidelity Workplace. Mr. Johnson declined to comment through a spokeswoman.

It was there, in exile at Workplace’s offices in Marlborough, Mass., that Ms. Johnson’s—and Fidelity’s—resurgence began.

The division was among the 401(k) industry’s biggest. It was also a mess. “It had gotten to a size where the lack of discipline and appropriate attention to detail was starting to become evident,” Ms. Johnson said.

Executives said Ms. Johnson finished her stint at Fidelity Workplace a few years later with an appreciation of the benefits of scale, of selling rivals’ funds as well as its own, of tech systems with the capacity to handle surges in client activity, and of connecting directly with individual customers.

She rose to president of Fidelity in 2012 and chief executive in 2014. Succeeding her famed father as CEO, Ms. Johnson needed to find her own leadership voice. Several Fidelity executives said they remember leaving meetings with Ms. Johnson not knowing where they stood. She also earned a reputation among other executives for surrounding herself with deputies who wouldn’t challenge her or the status quo.

One such executive was Jack Haley, a Fidelity lifer whom Ms. Johnson valued for his unwavering loyalty and work ethic, but whom others at the firm saw as a gatekeeper. “Our job is not to tell the Johnsons what’s important,” one former manager recalls Mr. Haley, who served as Ms. Johnson’s de facto chief of staff, frequently saying. Mr. Haley, now retired, declined to comment.

Ms. Johnson began to work closely with the head of the sprawling personal-investments business, Kathleen Murphy. Former Fidelity executives say Ms. Murphy’s candor and skills at navigating the bureaucracy helped Ms. Johnson become a more decisive and confident leader.

Former executives also said Ms. Johnson appeared distrustful of some of the flashier executives who held influence with her father. Job candidates heading to interviews with her were cautioned not to wear cuff links, on the theory these might remind her of a certain type of overly confident male executive prevalent on Wall Street.

By the time she took the CEO reins, the actively managed mutual funds for which Fidelity was best known were leaking client money. The firm still had star managers such as Will Danoff and Joel Tillinghast, but too many of its funds were struggling to keep pace with the stock market’s long rally.

Finding her stride, Ms. Johnson pushed out underperforming fund managers and revamped the pay schemes of those who remained. Portfolio managers, long lavished with perks, began to be held accountable for investment performance to a degree they weren’t before.

The stock-picking unit’s problems ran deeper than its investing performance. A spate of allegations of sexual harassment and bullying came to a head in 2017, when the firm pushed out several executives and hired a law firm to review employee behavior. That year, Ms. Johnson moved her office to the 11th floor of Fidelity’s downtown Boston headquarters, where the stock-fund managers reside.

Some analysts at Fidelity had long complained of unfairness in the way the firm evaluated them, with portfolio managers having a big say. In a 2017 meeting with female portfolio managers, Ms. Johnson asked about the way analysts were evaluated, which included a survey. Fund manager Ramona Persaud responded: “This is the same survey we used when you were running the division,” according to a person who witnessed the exchange. Ms. Johnson changed the analyst-performance surveys and ordered executives to undergo management training.

Ms. Johnson revamped the firm’s index funds by slashing fees and in 2016 dumping the “Spartan” name, calling them Fidelity funds instead to eliminate confusion. Fidelity leaves management of most of its index funds to Geode Capital Management Inc., a firm also owned by the Johnsons as well as current and former Fidelity executives. In a pioneering 2018 move, Fidelity unveiled several index funds with zero fees.

To reposition the asset-management business, Ms. Johnson leaned on an old friend, Bart Grenier. During her 2004 bid for power, Mr. Grenier was among her close allies, viewed by other executives as supportive of her campaign. He left the firm after the bid failed.

Months after Ms. Johnson added the title of chairman in 2016, she brought Mr. Grenier back. He ran its international investing business from London and in 2020 returned to Boston to head asset management.

The firm’s actively managed mutual funds still have profit margins far exceeding anything else Fidelity sells, but some of their prominent managers are well into their 60s. Mr. Grenier has sought to build new offerings such as quantitative tools and environmental, social and governance screens for portfolio managers.

Fidelity is launching a fund to invest in private credit, including loans to midsize companies. It raised money for this from other Fidelity funds and is expected eventually to let individuals invest directly. Mr. Grenier said the active-management business produced organic revenue growth in 2020 and 2021.

The pandemic’s awakening of new interest in stock trading in 2020 flooded brokerage firms with orders and strained Fidelity’s systems. Waiting times on calls jumped, and customers complained.

Fearful of missing a chance to nab a new generation of investors, Ms. Johnson assembled business heads to figure out why they couldn’t hire enough associates. Lieutenants offered reasons such as license requirements in certain customer-facing roles and a tight labor market.

“That’s ridiculous,” Ms. Johnson said, according to one person in attendance. “Hire as many people as you can.”

Fidelity embarked on its biggest-ever hiring spree. It ended 2021 with more than 60,000 employees, up about 22% in a year. Of 16,000 people hired last year, nearly 80% will deal with customers, such as at call centers and branch offices.

The hiring, coupled with buyouts of about 3,000 workers in 2017 and 2,000 last year, radically changed the makeup of Fidelity’s workforce. On average, employees now are younger, less-experienced and more diverse in race and gender. While most of the financial-services world has undergone a similar transition, the changes have been jarring inside Fidelity, where 30-year careers weren’t uncommon.

Dozens of longtime employees, on job-posting and company-gossip message boards and in conversations with human resources, have lamented Fidelity’s transformation and complained of what some called its embrace of “wokeness.”

A Fidelity spokeswoman declined to comment. “Fidelity is committed to continually strengthening diversity and inclusivity, in our workplace and our communities,” Ms. Johnson and Wendy John, Fidelity’s head of global diversity and inclusion, wrote in a 2021 letter.

Many on the management team, too, now are younger and more tech-savvy, and fewer came up through Fidelity’s mutual-fund operation. When Ms. Murphy retired as head of personal investments, her successor came from outside— Joanna Rotenberg of BMO Financial Group.

“We needed a senior management team where everybody had a healthy level of experience managing technology,” Ms. Johnson said at the time.

Ms. Johnson was early among mainstream Wall Street executives to take an interest in cryptocurrencies, and began in 2013 to hold Wednesday-evening meetings to discuss crypto and blockchain technology. Two years later, Fidelity started mining bitcoin, mostly as a research project. It later added a link on retail customers’ accounts to Coinbase, the crypto exchange, to track digital-asset holdings.

Fidelity created a business in 2018 to store and trade bitcoin for sophisticated investors such as hedge funds, and in 2020 launched a crypto fund for deep-pocketed customers. It has also filed with regulators to start an ETF that tracks the value of bitcoin. The cryptocurrency, which hit a record $68,991 in November, has since fallen by half.

Ms. Johnson took aim at a collection of unrelated businesses her father, now 91, had acquired. It was weighing down profits, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Former employees said the portfolio was also cutting into the dividends paid to Fidelity’s shareholders: the Johnson family and a group of Fidelity executives and portfolio managers.

Fidelity sold some of these businesses, including a Maine tomato farm. The rest shifted to other Johnson-family entities. The moves made the company’s profits less volatile, Moody’s said.

Fidelity says its operating profit margin was 34% in 2020, up from 20.5% in 2014. A spokeswoman said margins also grew as it added new customers and lowered costs.

Ms. Johnson said she couldn’t predict whether Fidelity would ever be run by someone outside the family. Her brother, a little younger, is CEO of the family’s Pembroke real-estate investing firm. A daughter, who worked at Fidelity as a client-relationship manager, left the company in December.

Would Fidelity ever merge with another financial colossus? No one has raised the idea with her, Ms. Johnson said.

“I want to create a business for the future,” she said. “I want to create a business that will endure, and you can’t know all the answers to that now.

WSJ : Lockheed Martin, FTC Agree Not to Close Aerojet Rocketdyne Deal Before Jan

Lockheed Martin, FTC Agree Not to Close Aerojet Rocketdyne Deal Before Jan. 27
Lockheed Martin and Aerojet say they still support planned deal

Lockheed Martin Corp. LMT +0.64% said Tuesday that federal antitrust enforcers have rejected its proposed terms to close the $4.4 billion purchase of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc. this month.

Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defense contractor by revenue, said it was “highly likely” that the Federal Trade Commission would sue before Jan. 27 to block its proposed deal for Aerojet, which makes engines for rockets and missiles.

The FTC had no immediate comment.

Lockheed Martin agreed to buy Aerojet in December 2020, but has faced opposition from some defense contractors concerned about the future availability of the rocket motors. Lockheed Martin said it still supported the planned deal, and could decide to challenge any FTC suit or terminate the planned deal.

Aerojet Rocketdyne said it continued to support the proposed deal.

WSJ : GM Pumps More Money Into EVs, Picks Michigan for Big Investment

GM Pumps More Money Into EVs, Picks Michigan for Big Investment
Auto maker doubles down on electric-truck production, plans battery-cell factory with LG Energy Solution

General Motors Co. GM -2.09% confirmed plans for a multibillion-dollar investment to produce electric pickup trucks in Michigan, giving the Great Lakes region a boost as competition intensifies between states to win a bigger role in the industry’s shift to battery-powered cars.

The auto maker on Tuesday said it would convert a suburban Detroit factory into a center for the production of electric pickup trucks and build a battery-cell plant in Lansing, Mich. It plans to spend $4 billion to convert its Orion Assembly factory to build plug-in trucks and will split the cost of the $2.6 billion battery factory with partner LG Energy Solution.

On top of this spending, GM plans to invest about $500 million into two assembly plants near Lansing.

Altogether, GM plans to contribute nearly $6 billion of the $7 billion in the total costs for the projects, a figure that the car company says is its single largest investment in history. The spending is expected to create 4,000 jobs in the state, the auto maker said. Plans for the Orion revamp and the new battery-cell plant were first reported last month by The Wall Street Journal.

The Michigan projects come after years of investment by car companies to expand production in the southern U.S., moving the auto industry’s center of gravity away from the industrial Midwest.

Last year, Toyota Motor disclosed plans to build a battery plant in North Carolina, and Ford Motor invested in three battery plants, two in Kentucky and one in Tennessee, as well as a new electric-truck plant near Memphis, Tenn.

In previous years, Volkswagen AG expanded electric-vehicle output at its factory in Chattanooga, Tenn. Polestar, the electric-vehicle company owned by Chinese car maker Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., produces cars in South Carolina.

“This news is great for us and great for Michigan, the epicenter of the work we’re doing on EVs,” said GM President Mark Reuss. “Michigan will be the recognized hub and leader of innovation in the U.S. for EV [research and development] and manufacturing.”

GM has announced a $35 billion investment into electric and autonomous vehicles through 2025 and plans to have factory capacity for more than 1 million electric vehicles, part of its goal to surpass Tesla in U.S. sales of electric vehicles.

Other global auto makers also are funneling money into electric vehicles, a collective bet amounting to more than $300 billion through 2025, according to consulting firm Alix Partners. Still, EV sales accounted for less than 2% of Ford’s and GM’s 2021 total sales, and remain just a fraction of the autos market overall.

As supply chain disturbances have rattled auto makers, they have increasingly moved toward producing electric-vehicle batteries in house. Car executives have said they want control over that critical part of the electric-vehicle supply chain so they can help advance battery technology and protect against future shortages.

The $4 billion investment in the Orion Assembly plant will support production of the Chevrolet Silverado EV, which GM revealed earlier this month, and the electric GMC Sierra, planned to begin production in 2024. GM projects an electric-vehicle truck production capacity of 600,000 once Orion Assembly and its plant in Detroit are fully operational, though it declined to peg a timeline.

The auto maker built about 925,000 full-size gas-powered pickup trucks in North America last year, according to Wards Intelligence.

The battery-cell factory represents a 50-50 partnership between LG Energy Solution and GM. It is the third plant to be established through this partnership—they have two other factory projects in the works, one in Ohio and another in Tennessee.

FT : Israeli panel recommends fourth Covid vaccine dose for all adults

Israeli panel recommends fourth Covid vaccine dose for all adults
Country is first to back quadruple jabs after study showed they increased protection against severe illness

Israel’s vaccine advisory panel has recommended a fourth dose of a Covid-19 shot for all adults, a world first, as the country battles a surge in infections driven by the Omicron coronavirus variant.

The move follows research showing fourth doses doubled protection against symptomatic Covid and increased protection against severe illness by three to five times, compared with three doses.

Other countries, such as the UK, US and Chile, have signed off on fourth doses for immunocompromised people, such as those living with HIV or certain transplant recipients, but have hesitated on launching a widescale second booster campaign.

Israel’s vaccine advisory committee “recommends that those aged 18 and over be able to be vaccinated with a fourth vaccine dose”, confirmed the Israeli health ministry in a statement. The rollout is subject to approval by health ministry director-general Nachman Ash.

People would become eligible five months after their third dose or after recovering from the disease, the ministry added. In the past fortnight, about 900,000 Israelis have tested positive for Covid.

Israel became the first country to extend fourth doses to over-60s, healthcare workers and people with weakened immune systems in late December. About 600,000 Israelis have already received a second booster and about half of the population have received a third shot.

A senior Israeli government scientist told the Financial Times the recommendation was based on enabling “individual decision-making” rather than “pushing” fourth doses on younger groups. “We are making the people the gatekeepers over the decision,” he said.

He added it was a “quite unusual” recommendation aimed at balancing the “accumulating evidence” of the protection offered against severe disease against “the multiple open-ended questions” about safety risks and the likelihood of waning immunity.

The World Health Organization last week endorsed third doses, saying they should be prioritised for vulnerable people. It did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Israeli decision on Tuesday.

Marco Cavaleri, head of biological health threats and vaccines strategy at the European Medicines Agency, told reporters earlier this month that boosting was not something the agency thought could be done “continuously . . . every three to four months” for the general population. And, also in January, UK vaccine advisers said there was “not an immediate need to introduce a second booster dose”.

“We don’t want to force people to receive it, and to say if they don’t receive it, they are doing something bad,” said Boaz Lev, head of Israel’s vaccine advisory panel. “We want for each person to decide if they want another edge of protection.”

He said although data were limited, evidence pointed towards a fourth dose being “in many ways life-saving”. The latest study on fourth dose effectiveness, conducted by several Israeli universities and the Sheba Medical Center, compared about 400,000 quadruple-jabbed people with 600,000 triple-jabbed and was published on Sunday.

Referring to whether other countries would follow suit with a broad fourth-dose campaign, Lev said: “My crystal ball has broken and I haven’t purchased a new one. Each country . . . is different and they are trying to learn from one another.”

A total of 83,613 people in Israel tested positive for Covid in the latest 24-hour period, as the Omicron wave sweeps the country, bringing with it record-breaking infection rates. As of Tuesday morning, there were 2,256 Covid patients in hospitals, of whom just 177 required mechanical ventilation, according to official data.

FT : Europe must get serious about renovating homes to ease energy crisis

Europe must get serious about renovating homes to ease energy crisis
As prices rise and Russia threatens to ration supply, the EU urgently needs to cut its gas consumption

As Europe enters its coldest months, business and households face gas prices that have more than quadrupled since last year. This could grind on indefinitely if European leaders do not end their dependency on fossil fuels.

The gas price crisis and mounting geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine have once again highlighted that Europe needs a secure, local supply of renewable energy and to cut down gas consumption, much of which goes on heating our homes.

Over 40 per cent of the gas the EU imports is used for heating buildings, and a third of European homes use gas for heating. Reducing energy demand through better insulated homes and accelerating the take-up of renewable heating will help put Europe’s energy dependencies on a new footing.

Before the gas price crisis — and before the pandemic and the highest inflation in decades — 50m Europeans, or one in four households, were already struggling to afford heating. Even those families not personally threatened by energy poverty were directly affected. Gas companies across Europe have folded or shut their doors to new customers. In one case in the Netherlands, 90,000 customers saw their bills suddenly double after their provider was taken over.

Brussels has already pledged a “renovation wave” as part of the EU Green Deal. Now it is time for member states to launch this in earnest. Shortly before the end of last year, the European Commission proposed new legislation to renovate the most energy-hungry buildings ahead of yet another EU leaders’ meeting that discussed the energy price crisis. There is about €1.8tn available, including €670bn from the recovery fund, a third of which is earmarked for climate action. Surveys show that people want to live in energy-efficient homes, and they are looking to their government to speed the transition to greener buildings.

We need to match this political will and public desire with a credibly financed vision of the warm and affordable homes we want to live in, and with the laws and policies to make it happen.

Meeting the Paris climate agreement goals also requires that we change the way we build, insulate and heat our homes. The early impacts of climate change are noticeable in Europe already; a recent model by the Euro-Mediterranean Centre on Climate Change showed that rising temperatures could cause heatwaves to increase at least tenfold by 2050.

Some are already responding. Helsinki — with its 300,000 households, and biting winters — has a clear plan to be climate neutral by 2035, with a complete phaseout of coal and gas for heating. In France, the Abbé Pierre Foundation is trialling support systems to help people on low incomes invest in renovating their homes. The Netherlands has 50 “natural gas-free districts” where the government supports alternative, low-carbon heating sources.

This is a huge economic opportunity for rebuilding a post-pandemic economy, one that takes us closer to net zero. Home renovations can create millions of jobs, especially in small and medium-sized enterprises. In Spain alone, according to trade unions, energy efficiency renovations can create work for nearly half a million people.

At every level, the expertise points to clear social benefits of pursuing this campaign to revamp our homes and doing it now.

Across Europe, the worst-performing homes from an energy efficiency perspective are disproportionately occupied by low-income households, and so far they have largely missed out on renovations. By targeting these homes, we can both reduce energy poverty and ensure the benefits of the Green Deal are felt by the families who need it most.

Better homes also improve air quality, reducing the considerable public health impacts linked to respiratory disease from having to endure the cold and damp, and other effects on people spending more than 90 per cent of their time in ill-designed spaces.

This is a moment of ambition and investment in Europe. The resources and tools are there, as is the strong call for climate action seen in every recent election across EU member states.

Without a decisive change, we face a severe uphill battle to seize these obvious opportunities, while cutting energy bills — and that is without the risks of geopolitical interference and climate turbulence.

The appetite is there, as is a bracing spirit of ingenuity. We need to harness this energy into an inclusive and just renovation effort, which lets Europeans see and feel the Green Deal improving lives in their own homes.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • CS -5%, PETS -4%, RTX -3%, GE -2.7%, XRX -1.9%, JNJ -1.3%, STLD -0.7%

Other news:

  • AJRD -17% (provides update on proposed merger transaction with Lockheed Martin)
  • LULU -4% (stock offering)
  • GMAB -3.1% (reports 2021 total net sales of DARZALEX of $6.023 bln)
  • FTI -2.5% (awarded EPCI contract from Petrobras)
  • FB -2.4% (provides details on new financial reporting structure)
  • CSX -2% (names new CFO)
  • JNJ -1.5% (Janssen Pharma announces conclusions comparing TREMFYA to advanced therapies)
  • NEWP -1.5% (names new CEO)
  • VRSK -1.1% (to sell its 3E business to New Mountain Capital for up to $950 mln)

Analyst comments:

  • KR -3.2% (downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo)
  • QTWO -3.2% (downgraded to Sector Weight from Overweight at KeyBanc Capital Markets )
  • MPC -2.3% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at Piper Sandler)
  • CTXS -2.2% (downgraded to Sell from Neutral at Citigroup)
  • PLAN -2.1% (downgraded to Sector Weight from Overweight at KeyBanc Capital Markets)
  • VMW -2.1% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup)
  • NVO -1.1% (downgraded to Sell from Hold at Liberum)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:

  • MDRX +8.6% (issues upside Q4 rev guidance, also approves new $250 mln share repurchase program), ERIC +5.6%, CFB +4.8%, IBTX +4.5%, LOGI +4.2%, CUBI +1.8%, IBM +1.5%, AXP +1.2%, MMM +1.1%, IPAR +1% (guides Q4 revs above consensus; guides FY22 earnings and revs above consensus), VZ +1%, LMT +0.8%, IVZ +0.7%, BRO +0.6%, ADM +0.6%

Other news:

  • SRRA +66.3% (announces that momelotinib achieved "statistically significant" efficacy across key endpoints; also updates on the financial support for momelotinib)
  • SDC +6% (announces series of strategic actions including reduction of workforce; reaffirms FY21 rev guidance)
  • HLGN +3.8% (stock offering)
  • CPLP +2.9% (increases dividend)
  • EFTR +2.7% (provides pipeline updates; establishes investment agreement with Lincoln Park Capital)
  • DCPH +2.5% (presents results from the INTRIGUE Phase 3 study)
  • SILV +2.3% (Las Chispas Construction Update - Tracking Ahead of Schedule and On Budget)
  • SON +2.2% (to increase prices for all paperboard tubes and cores)
  • VST +1.5% (confirms planned expansion of Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility)

Analyst comments:

  • BPMC +2.4% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Stifel)
  • NKE +0.5% (upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo)

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

  • Gapping up:
    • LOGI +8.1%, SDC +8%, ERIC +6.3%, BRO +6%, HLGN +5.3%, CFB +4.8%, IBTX +4.5%, CPLP +2.9%, IBM +2.9%, SON +2.2%, IPAR +2.1%, MDRX +1.8%, CUBI +1.8%, VST +1.5%
  • Gapping down:
    • CS -3.7%, PETS -2.6%, FTI -2.2%, FB -1.6%, STLD -1.6%, NEWP -1.5%, VRSK -1.2%, LULU -0.5%, WMT -0.5%, ELS -0.5%, UMC -0.5%

>>> Gucci Taps Toy Brand Superplastic to Drop 10 ‘SuperGucci’ NFTs in February

Gucci Taps Toy Brand Superplastic to Drop 10 ‘SuperGucci’ NFTs in February
Gucci is the latest fashion brand to engage with NFTs with the launch of a limited series of digital collectibles.


A tease of the upcoming drop. (Gucci/Superplastic)
Italian luxury fashion brand Gucci is the latest to edge its way into Web 3 with the upcoming drop of 10 non-fungible tokens (NFT) beginning Feb. 1.

The NFTs have been created in collaboration with the cult toy brand Superplastic and co-designed by Gucci's head of design, Alessandro Michele. Each NFT will be given away with a ceramic sculpture handmade in Italy and co-designed by Gucci. The NFT drop will be Gucci’s first.


Superplastic is a company that makes artistic vinyl toys for the collectibles market and has issued NFTs through the Winklevoss-owned Nifty Gateway. Superplastic was launched in 2018 by Kidrobot founder Paul Budnitz and has sold millions of dollars in designer toys and apparel based on characters Janky & Guggimon, Dayzee & Staxx, Kranky, ShüDog.

On Friday, Gucci tweeted about the roadmap and launch of a Discord channel as a place to encourage open conversations with the community about what’s next in the metaverse.

Digital fashion momentum
In May, designer fans were left stunned when a virtual Gucci Dionysus bag was sold on the gaming platform Roblox for 350,000 Robux, or roughly $4,115 at the time. The same physical purse cost $3,400.

Reddit co-founder and VC investor Alexis Ohanian was quick to point out in a tweet, “Remember: this Roblox purse is not an NFT and thus has no value/use/transferability outside the Roblox world – yet it's worth more than the physical one.”


The Superplastic collaboration seems to represent a change of course.

Luxury fashion brands are already making millions of dollars from auctioning NFTs. In September, Dolce & Gabbana launched its NFT collection, Collezione Genesi, which fetched approximately $5.65 million in a sale.

With more fashion brands launching NFTs, many are asking if this is a transformational moment for the fashion industry or merely a bout of trendhopping.


Luxury fashion brand Prada and sportswear giant Adidas announced last week the launch of an NFT project built on the Polygon network that allows fans to contribute their own designs.

Morgan Stanley predicts the total NFT market is expected to grow to $300 billion by 2030 with brands such as Gucci and Balenciaga in the best position to profit from digital collaborations in the metaverse.

So far, the Gucci endeavor does not include an activation in popular open metaverses such as The Sandbox and Decentraland.