FT Lex : Euroclear/Fnality: tokenised stocks and bonds have clear advantages

Euroclear/Fnality: tokenised stocks and bonds have clear advantages
Deal paves way for financial institutions to approve and settle digital securities trades using a distributed ledger

Mass mobilisation is needed for any successful revolution. On Monday, Euroclear added a little extra weight to the movement to bring new digital assets into the mainstream. The clearing giant is investing in Fnality, a payments consortium whose members include Nasdaq and UBS. The deal paves the way for financial institutions to clear and settle dealings in digital securities using a distributed ledger system.

Euroclear, in common with other traditional finance institutions, cannot afford to get left behind as digital assets are used more widely. Blockchain-based securities could supplant the conventional stocks and bonds Euroclear handles. They may feature as proxies for the latter as well as outright alternatives.

Existing systems of clearing and settlement involve verification by a centralised body that are both time consuming and costly for participants. Proponents say that it, in contrast, it should be possible to settle large volumes of digital asset transactions using blockchain technology in real time, much faster and more cheaply.

Nearly instantaneous transactions clearly bring benefits. But the biggest savings could come from reductions in cash liquidity requirements for participants. Using synthetic central bank digital currencies, another potential development, would enable this change. This reduces the financing strain and cost for banks on either side of transactions and in theory lowers overall financial stress from funds tied up in the system.

Euroclear settled almost a quadrillion (1,000 trillion) euros of securities transactions last year. It has chosen Fnality for a reason. Set up in 2019, the payments company already has the backing of some of Europe’s largest banks, including Barclays and Santander.

Regulated assets are currently a tiny part of decentralised finance, which is dominated by cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens. That is slowly changing as regulators bring tokenised equities and bonds into their jurisdictions. Volumes are currently small but they could account for over a quarter of listed trading volumes by 2030, according to analysts at Quinlan & Associates. That is too big an opportunity — or risk — for established infrastructure providers to overlook.

NYT : How One Oligarch Used Shell Companies and Wall Street Ties to Invest in th

How One Oligarch Used Shell Companies and Wall Street Ties to Invest in the U.S.

Using a network of banks, law firms and advisers in multiple countries, Roman Abramovich invested billions in American hedge funds.

In July 2012, a shell company registered in the British Virgin Islands wired $20 million to an investment vehicle in the Cayman Islands that was controlled by a large American hedge fund firm.

The wire transfer was the culmination of months of work by a small army of handlers and enablers in the United States, Europe and the Caribbean. It was a stealth operation intended, at least in part, to mask the source of the funds: Roman Abramovich.

For two decades, the Russian oligarch has relied on this circuitous investment strategy — deploying a string of shell companies, routing money through a small Austrian bank and tapping the connections of leading Wall Street firms — to quietly place billions of dollars with prominent U.S. hedge funds and private equity firms, according to people with knowledge of the transactions.

The key was that every lawyer, corporate director, hedge fund manager and investment adviser involved in the process could honestly say that they weren’t working directly for Mr. Abramovich. In some cases, participants weren’t even aware of whose money they were helping to manage.

Wealthy foreign investors like Mr. Abramovich have long been able to move money into American funds using such secretive, roundabout setups, taking advantage of a lightly regulated investment industry and Wall Street’s willingness to ask few questions about the origins of the money.

Now, as the United States and other countries impose sanctions on those close to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, hunting down these fortunes could pose significant challenges.

Last week, the Internal Revenue Service asked Congress for more resources as it helps to oversee the Biden administration’s sanctions program along with a new Justice Department kleptocracy task force. And on Capitol Hill, lawmakers are pushing a bill, known as the Enablers Act, that would require investment advisers to identify and more carefully vet their customers.

Mr. Abramovich has an estimated fortune of $13 billion, derived in large part from his well-timed purchase of an oil company owned by the Russian government that he sold back to the state at a massive profit. This month, European and Canadian authorities imposed sanctions on him and froze his assets, which include the famed Chelsea Football Club in London. The United States has not sanctioned him.

Mr. Abramovich’s assets in the United States include many millions of dollars of real estate, such as a pair of luxury residences near Aspen, Colo. But he also invested large sums of money with financial institutions. His ties to Mr. Putin and the source of his wealth have long made him a controversial figure.

Many of Mr. Abramovich’s U.S. investments were facilitated by a small firm called Concord Management LLC, which is led by Michael Matlin, according to people with knowledge of the transactions who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Mr. Matlin declined to comment beyond issuing a statement that described Concord as “a consulting firm that provides independent third party research, due diligence, and monitoring of investments.”

A spokeswoman for Mr. Abramovich didn’t respond to emails and text messages requesting comment.

Concord, founded in 1999, didn’t directly manage any of Mr. Abramovich’s money. It acted more like an investment adviser and due diligence firm, making recommendations to the directors of shell companies in Caribbean tax havens about potential investments in marquee American investment firms, according to people briefed on the matter.

Big Wall Street banks like Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley often introduced Concord executives to hedge funds, according to people with knowledge of those meetings.

Over the years, Concord arranged more than 100 investments in different hedge funds and private equity firms, according to an internal document prepared by one Wall Street firm. They included funds managed by Millennium Management, BlackRock, Sarissa Capital Management, Carlyle Group, D.E. Shaw and Bear Stearns, according to people briefed on the matter and the document.

Concord kept a low profile. It didn’t have a website. It is not registered with U.S. regulators. One of the few times it surfaced in public was in 2020, when Concord applied for and received a Paycheck Protection Program loan worth $265,000 during the pandemic. (Concord repaid the loan, a spokesman said.)

Concord’s secrecy made some on Wall Street wary.

In 2015 and 2016, investigators at State Street, a financial services firm, filed “suspicious activity reports” alerting the U.S. government to transactions that Concord arranged involving some of Mr. Abramovich’s Caribbean shell companies, BuzzFeed News reported. State Street declined to comment.

American financial institutions are required to file such reports to help the U.S. government combat money laundering and other financial crimes, though the reports are not themselves evidence of any wrongdoing having been committed.
But for the most part, American financiers had no inkling about — or interest in discovering — the source of the money that Concord was directing. As long as routine background checks didn’t turn up red flags, it was fine.

Paulson & Company, the hedge fund run by John Paulson, received investments from a company that Concord represented, according to a person with knowledge of the investment. Mr. Paulson said in an email that he had “no knowledge” of Concord’s investors.

Concord also steered tens of millions of dollars from two shell companies to Highland Capital, a Texas hedge fund. Highland hired a unit of JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s largest bank, to ensure that the companies were legitimate and that the investments complied with anti-money laundering rules, according to federal court records in an unrelated bankruptcy case.

JPMorgan cleared the investment. Highland never learned the ultimate source of the money, the court records show.
Big hedge funds might have accepted the money even if they realized it belonged to Mr. Abramovich. At the time, the oligarch hadn’t been sanctioned.

The manner in which one hedge fund received Mr. Abramovich’s money in the summer of 2012 shows the challenges facing U.S. and European authorities who hope to track down the assets of Mr. Abramovich and other oligarchs.

The manager of the fund, which oversaw billions of dollars but wasn’t a big name on Wall Street, provided a detailed accounting of his involvement on the condition that neither he nor his firm be named.

In 2012, a New York-based wealth manager at Credit Suisse, Gerald McGinley, contacted the fund manager on behalf of what he said was a wealthy family. Mr. McGinley said Concord was representing the family and was interested in investing tens of millions of dollars with the hedge fund.

The fund manager said Credit Suisse told him that in order to receive the investment, he would have to set up a special financial vehicle in an offshore jurisdiction, so that the investment wouldn’t incur U.S. taxes. The hedge fund would receive a small percentage of the total investment as a fee, and Credit Suisse would get 20 percent of that fee.

Accompanied by one of Mr. McGinley’s colleagues at Credit Suisse, the fund manager traveled to Concord’s offices in a drab building in the New York City suburb of Tarrytown. Thick metal doors hid its offices from other occupants of the building. Inside, the walls were devoid of artwork or decorations.

The fund manager didn’t know who Concord’s client was, and he didn’t ask.

Mr. McGinley, who now works at the Swiss bank UBS, didn’t respond to questions about his work with Concord. A Credit Suisse spokeswoman declined to comment.

After initially meeting with the fund manager, Concord executives referred him to HighWater, a firm based in Grand Cayman that specialized in providing “corporate governance services” to investment managers.

For $15,000 a year, plus other fees, HighWater would provide an employee to sit on the board of the financial vehicle that the fund manager was expected to launch to accept the wealthy family’s money, according to emails between the fund manager and a HighWater executive reviewed by The New York Times.

The fund manager also brought on Boris Onefater, who ran a small U.S. consulting firm, Constellation, as another board member. Mr. Onefater said in an interview that he couldn’t remember whose money the Cayman vehicle was managing.

“You’re asking for ancient history,” he said. “I don’t recall Mr. Abramovich’s name coming up.”

The fund manager hired Mourant, an offshore law firm, to get the paperwork in order for the Cayman vehicle. The managing partner of Mourant did not respond to requests for comment.

He also hired GlobeOp Financial Services, which provides administration services to hedge funds, to ensure that the Cayman entity was complying with anti-money-laundering laws and wasn’t doing business with anyone who had been sanctioned by the U.S. government, according to a copy of the contract.

“We abide by all laws in all jurisdictions in which we do business,” said Emma Lowrey, a spokeswoman for GlobeOp, which is now part of SS&C Technologies, a financial technology company based in Windsor, Conn.

John Lewis, a HighWater executive, said in an email to The Times that his firm received four referrals from Concord from 2011 to 2014 and hadn’t dealt with the firm since then.

“We were aware of no links to Russian money or Roman Abramovich,” Mr. Lewis said. He added that GlobeOp “did not identify anything unusual, high risk, or that there were any politically exposed persons with respect to any investors.”
The Cayman fund opened for business in July 2012 when $20 million arrived by wire transfer. The expectation was that tens of millions more would follow, although additional funds never showed up. The Cayman fund was run as an independent entity, using the same investment strategy — buying and selling exchange-traded funds — employed by the fund manager’s main U.S. hedge fund.

The $20 million was wired from an entity called Caythorpe Holdings, which was registered in the British Virgin Islands.
Documents accompanying the wire transfer showed that the money originated with Kathrein Privatbank in Vienna. It arrived in Grand Cayman after passing through another Austrian bank, Raiffeisen, and then JPMorgan. (JPMorgan was serving as a correspondent bank, essentially acting as an intermediary for banks with smaller international networks.)

A spokesman for Kathrein declined to comment. A spokeswoman for JPMorgan declined to comment. Representatives for Raiffeisen did not respond to requests for comment.

The fund manager noticed that some of the documentation was signed by a lawyer named Natalia Bychenkova. The Russian-sounding name led him to conclude that he was probably managing money for a Russian oligarch. But the fund manager wasn’t bothered, since GlobeOp had verified that Caythorpe was compliant with know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering rules and laws.

He didn’t know who controlled Caythorpe, and he didn’t ask.

In early 2014, after Russia invaded the Ukrainian region of Crimea, markets tanked. The fund manager made a bearish bet on the direction of the stock market, and his fund got crushed when stocks rallied.

The following year, Caythorpe withdrew its money from the Cayman fund. Caythorpe was liquidated in 2017.

The fund manager said he didn’t realize until this month that he’d been investing money for Mr. Abramovich.

WSJ : Warhol’s Marilyn Monroe Portrait Goes on the Block for $200 Million

Warhol’s Marilyn Monroe Portrait Goes on the Block for $200 Million
Christie’s to sell ‘Shot Sage Blue Marilyn’ for record asking price at auction in May

An iconic Andy Warhol silk-screen portrait of Hollywood starlet Marilyn Monroe is headed to Christie’s in New York later this spring for $200 million—a record asking price for any artwork at auction.
The 3-foot square silk-screen from 1964 depicts a promotional photo from the actress’s film “Niagara.” The artist transformed the actress into a pop art icon by giving her a bubblegum-pink face, ruby lips and blue eye shadow set against a sage-blue background. The work is part of a signature series of “Shot Marilyn” portraits made famous after a gun-toting visitor allegedly fired a shot into a stack of canvases in the artist’s studio in 1964.
The seller of this “Shot Sage Blue Marilyn” version is an eponymous foundation created by the well-known Zurich dealer Doris Ammann, who died at age 76 last year, and her late brother, Thomas, a dealer who helped sell and catalog the official inventory of Warhol’s works before Mr. Ammann died in 1993.
If successful, this example will smash the artist’s current auction record of $105.4 million set nine years ago when Sotheby’s sold 1963’s “Silver Car Crash (Double Disaster).” Potential bidders will need to spend far more to surpass private sales of Warhol’s work, though. In 2017, hedge-fund billionaire Ken Griffin paid the estate of publishing magnate Si Newhouse at least $200 million for the orange version from the same “Shot Marilyn” series, according to a person familiar with the deal.
Andy Warhol, shown at a 1971 exhibit, transformed Marilyn Monroe into a pop art icon.
PHOTO: PA IMAGES/GETTY IMAGES
The coming sale will test the ebullience of the global art marketplace following months of robust sales. Despite the war in Ukraine, auction houses say collectors feel increasingly confident to put record-setting asking prices on their art trophies headed for sale.

Warhol collectors will also be following this sale closely. The artist created about 8,000 paintings and sculptures between 1952 and his death in 1987. His works turn up at auction so consistently—about 200 works a year—that they have become a bellwether for the entire art market.
On Monday, Christie’s said it intends to auction off “Shot Sage Blue Marilyn” in New York in May with all the theatrical frenzy it gave five years ago to the overall titleholder, Leonardo da Vinci’s $450.3 million “Salvator Mundi,” which carried a $100 million asking price.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
What do you see as the most meaningful impact that Andy Warhol has had on the art world? Join the conversation below.
It has been years since the upper reaches of Warhol’s market underwent a major test, dealers say. Meanwhile, his market pre-eminence has been challenged by younger artists he admired like Jean-Michel Basquiat, whose works have since sold for over $100 million; another example is estimated to sell for $70 million this May at Phillips. Yet collectors have been willing to splurge when prime examples by Warhol come onto the market, including last fall when Sotheby’s sold a nearly 7-foot-tall silk-screen of “Nine Marilyns” from 1962 from the Henry and Linda Macklowe collection for $47.4 million.
The rollicking back story of “Shot Sage Blue Marilyn” could give Warhol some added luster and justify the sky-high asking price, Christie’s said.
Warhol created five silk-screens of the star in this particular “Marilyn” series and experimented with a new screen printing technique he developed and only used for this set, giving each a different background such as red, orange, blue, sage blue and turquoise. The group became the stuff of art-world lore after a performance artist, Dorothy Podber, spotted them stacked against a wall in Warhol’s studio in 1964 and asked if she could shoot them. Warhol agreed, thinking she intended to photograph the works. Instead, she took out a gun and fired at a stack of “Marilyn” works in Warhol’s East 47th Street studio, known as the Factory.
Warhol banished the vandal and repaired the red and blue works that were damaged; the others, including this sage-blue version, remained unscathed. Even so, the incident’s notoriety has since turned these “Shot Marilyns” into plums coveted by some of the art world’s biggest buyers. Owners of other examples of “Shot Marilyn” works include newsprint executive Peter Brant, who said he paid $5,000 for the light blue version in 1967. Greek shipping tycoon Philip Niarchos won the red version at auction for $3.6 million in 1994 when the art market was in a slump. In 2007, Chicago collector Stefan Edlis sold his turquoise version for $80 million to hedge-fund manager Steven Cohen.
Ms. Ammann and her younger brother, Thomas, bought this sage-blue version from Mr. Newhouse, Christie’s said. Over the years it has been exhibited in museums such as New York’s Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Paris’s Centre Pompidou, and London’s Tate. The Ammanns’ foundation, formed as part of Ms. Ammann’s estate and overseen by her gallery partner Georg Frei, said it plans to ply all the proceeds from the Warhol into charitable causes helping children.

WWD : Gianfilippo Testa Named CEO of McQueen, Gintzburger Headed to Versace

Gianfilippo Testa Named CEO of McQueen, Gintzburger Headed to Versace
According to industry sources, McQueen's current CEO Emmanuel Gintzburger will take up a similar title at Versace, replacing Jonathan Akeroyd.
LONDON – Alexander McQueen has a new chief executive officer, Gianfilippo Testa. He’ll succeed Emmanuel Gintzburger who is leaving the group to become CEO of Versace, according to industry sources.
Kering said Monday that Testa will take up his role in May, and report to François-Henri Pinault.
Testa is an Italian national who began his career at TAG Heuer in 2002, and went on to hold a range of roles at LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, specifically at Fendi in Italy, Japan, and Hong Kong.
He joined Kering in 2016 as Gucci president Greater China and since 2019, he has been president of EMEA and VP Global Retail at Gucci. Kering said that Testa’s mission at McQueen will be to “accelerate the expansion of the British luxury house to tap its full potential.”


Kering said that Gintzburger decided to leave McQueen to pursue “new professional challenges outside Kering.”

Related Galleries

“I am grateful to François-Henri Pinault and Kering for their support and trust over the past twelve years,” said Gintzburger. “I thank Sarah Burton (McQueen’s creative director) and her incredible creative vision. I will always keep this extraordinary house and its team in my heart.”
According to sources, Gintzburger will take up the role at Versace left empty by Jonathan Akeroyd, the new CEO of Burberry.
Spokespeople for Alexander McQueen and Versace could not be reached for comment at press time, but an announcement of Gintzburger’s appointment could come shortly.
Gintzburger would be the second McQueen veteran to take on the CEO role at Versace.
Akeroyd helmed McQueen for 12 years, guiding the company through a roller coaster of highs and lows, and most importantly shepherding it through the suicide of Lee Alexander McQueen in 2010.
During his tenure at McQueen, Gintzburger oversaw an aggressive retail expansion plan, traveling the world to open stores with a new interiors concept designed by Burton.
He set an ambitious strategy aiming to double the retail network to more than 130 units in the medium term.
Last year, the McQueen CEO said that opening stores during the COVID-19 lockdowns was a must for the brand.
“With the world going into lockdown and travel being restricted, we felt it was important to continue our retail opening strategy,” he said. “And we had already planned an important expansion of our retail network in most of the key cities worldwide where we a have a strong potential to recruit local, or regional, clientele.”
He said that opening stores was “a way for us to connect with our local communities in their own cities and countries. Of course, we placed a significant emphasis on digital storytelling, but people also need a sense of community, calm and purpose. The physical experience in the store can definitely bring positive emotions,” he said.
As reported, Burton took charge of the concept herself, designing the stores in collaboration with the architect Smiljan Radić, and giving them the clutter-free feel of an art gallery, with high ceilings and dramatic, arty fixtures.

Vice : Microsoft Investigating Claim of Breach by Extortion Gang

Microsoft Investigating Claim of Breach by Extortion Gang
The LAPSUS$ group has previously compromised Nvidia and Samsung. Over the weekend the group published a screenshot that appeared to show access to internal Microsoft systems.


Microsoft is investigating claims that an extortion-focused hacking group that has previously compromised massive companies such as Ubisoft and Nvidia has gained access to internal Microsoft systems, according to a statement from the company.
The hacking group, which goes by the self-designated name LAPSUS$, has successfully breached a wave of corporations recently. LAPSUS$ sometimes makes unusual ransom demands of its victims, including asking Nvidia to unlock aspects of its graphics cards to make them more suitable for mining cryptocurrency. The group has so far not made any public demands against Microsoft.
On Sunday, LAPSUS$ posted a screenshot of what appeared to be an internal Microsoft developer account to their Telegram channel. The screenshot appeared to be from an Azure DevOps account, a product that Microsoft offers that allows developers to collaborate on projects. Specific projects shown in the screenshot include “Bing_UX,” potentially referring to the user experience of Microsoft’s Bing search engine; “Bing-Source,” indicating access to the source code of the search engine; and “Cortana,” Microsoft’s smart assistant. Other sections include “mscomdev,” “microsoft,” and “msblox,” indicating whoever took the screenshot may have access to other code repositories as well.
Do you know anything else about this breach or any others? We'd love to hear from you. Using a non-work phone or computer, you can contact Joseph Cox securely on Signal on +44 20 8133 5190, Wickr on josephcox, or email joseph.cox@vice.com.
Shortly after posting the screenshot, an administrator of LAPSUS$’s Telegram channel deleted the image.
“Deleted for now will repost later,” they wrote.
On Sunday, a Microsoft spokesperson told Motherboard in an email that “We are aware of the claims and are investigating.”
Earlier this month the group said on its Telegram channel that it was seeking employees inside companies who would be willing to work with them, including Microsoft.
“We recruit employees/insider at the following!!!!,” the group wrote on March 10, followed by a list of sectors such as telecommunications firms, large software or gaming companies, or data hosts. In the message, the group explicitly pointed to Apple, IBM, and Microsoft as companies they would be interested in. “TO NOTE: WE ARE NOT LOOKING FOR DATA, WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE EMPLOYEE TO PROVIDE US A VPN OR CITRIX TO THE NETWORK, or some anydesk,” the message added, describing particular ways that the hackers may be able to access target companies’ networks with the rogue employee’s help.
THE SCREENSHOT UPLOADED BY LAPSUS$. IMAGE: TELEGRAM.
Since December, the group has breached the Ministry of Health of Brazil, a slew of Brazilian and Portuguese companies, and then Nvidia and Samsung in February and March respectively, according to a timeline of LAPSUS$ attacks published by cybersecurity firm Silent Push. The group also seemingly took credit for breaching Ubisoft this month.
During some of its attacks, the group made a demand of payment in exchange for not leaking internal data it had stolen from the victims. In the NVIDIA case, the hackers demanded that the company open source its GPU drivers and remove a limitation on its 30-series cards around mining Ethereum, The Verge reported at the time. On its Telegram group, LAPSUS$ also claimed that NVIDIA, or someone working on its behalf, hacked back the attacks and tried to in turn encrypt the stolen material. The group ended up leaking some NVIDIA data as well as data stolen from Samsung.
LAPSUS$ may have also been responsible for hacking gaming giant Electronic Arts, although the hackers didn’t use the LUPSUS$ name until after Motherboard revealed that breach last June. In a later post on an underground forum, a user wrote “the real credits are for LAPSUS$, we will leak a lot more stuff.”
In an email to Motherboard, Stefano De Blasi, cyber threat research analyst at cybersecurity firm Digital Shadows, pointed to two things that make LAPSUS$ different from your common extortion gang. First, the group has never actually deployed ransomware, instead exfiltrating data and using that to blackmail the target. This allows the group to move more stealthily, De Blasi said. De Blasi also pointed to LAPSUS$'s interactive presence on Telegram, and specifically that the group messages with its followers.
Motherboard previously reported that hackers were able to gain access to the contents of MSN, Hotmail, and Outlook users’ email inboxes after abusing access to a customer support portal.

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls

  • Upgrades:
    • Air Products (APD) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan; tgt $275
    • Armstrong World Industries (AWI) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Jefferies; tgt $111
    • Assoc Banc-Corp (ASB) upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo; tgt raised to $28
    • Azenta (AZTA) initiated with an Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt $100
    • Banco Santander (SAN) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Jefferies
    • BlackBerry (BB) upgraded to Sector Perform from Underperform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt $7
    • Caixabank (CAIXY) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Jefferies
    • Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Wells Fargo; tgt raised to $70
    • Deutsche Bank (DB) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities
    • Duolingo (DUOL) upgraded to Overweight from Sector Weight at KeyBanc Capital Markets; tgt $112
    • Eni S.p.A. (E) upgraded to Buy from Hold at HSBC Securities
    • Integral Ad Science (IAS) upgraded to Strong Buy from Outperform at Raymond James; tgt raised to $27
    • Manchester United (MANU) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Deutsche Bank; tgt $18
    • Old Second Bancorp Inc. (OSBC) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at DA Davidson; tgt $22
  • Downgrades:
    • AvePoint (AVPT) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt $7
    • Blend Labs (BLND) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Truist; tgt $7.50
    • Check Point Software (CHKP) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt $130
    • Dingdong Ltd (DDL) downgraded to Underweight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $4.20
    • eHealth (EHTH) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $15
    • Fortune Brands Home & Security (FBHS) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Jefferies; tgt lowered to $95
    • H&M (HNNMY) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan
    • Huntsman (HUN) downgraded to Sector Weight from Overweight at KeyBanc Capital Markets
    • Immunogen (IMGN) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt lowered to $6
    • Installed Building Products (IBP) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Jefferies; tgt lowered to $105
    • JOANN Inc. (JOAN) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Guggenheim
    • TotalEnergies SE (TTE) downgraded to Hold from Buy at HSBC Securities
  • Others:
  • Alleghany Corporation (Y) initiated with an Outperform at Keefe Bruyette; tgt $815
  • American Tower (AMT) added to Positive Catalyst Watch list at Citigroup; tgt $300
  • BioAtla (BCAB) initiated with a Buy at H.C. Wainwright; tgt $25
  • Equinix (EQIX) resumed with a Buy at Citigroup; tgt $950
  • Playtika (PLTK) resumed with a Neutral at Citigroup; tgt $20
  • Silvergate Capital (SI) initiated with a Buy at BofA Securities; tgt $200
  • SpartanNash (SPTN) initiated with a Buy at CL King
  • St James's Place PLC (STJPF) initiated with a Buy at Jefferies
  • United Natural Foods (UNFI) initiated with a Buy at CL King