FT : Multi-manager hedge funds meet their maker

Multi-manager hedge funds meet their maker
Three decades ago, when star traders such as George Soros, Julian Robertson and Paul Tudor Jones were masters of the universe, a new generation of firms began to crop up that looked different to their predecessors.

These funds hired a ton of specialist traders who were given their own profit-and-loss accounts and whose survival was predicated on the whims of the markets. While their trading was theoretically overseen by sophisticated risk management technology, any manager who sustained big losses could find themselves jobless.

The so-called multi-manager method was pioneered by Ken Griffin’s Citadel and Izzy Englander’s Millennium Management. The two launched their firms within a year of each other and still dominate the industry three decades later.

But the business model they pioneered is now at risk of becoming a victim of its own success, DD’s Ortenca Aliaj and the FT’s Harriet Agnew report in this Big Read, amid a fierce talent war and rising interest rates that eat into the healthy returns they’ve been able to deliver for investors.

Over the past five years in particular, multi-manager funds have emerged as the fastest growing and most profitable hedge funds on the scene. 

Their diversified portfolios and ability to slash or raise their level of risk quickly gave them a key advantage during the pandemic when markets went into a tailspin.

But multi-managers often use huge amounts of leverage relative to their peers to juice returns — an average of more than five times their assets, by Goldman Sachs’ calculations — on the guise that they can oversee risk.

That hasn’t meshed well with higher interest rates, which have increased the cost of borrowing and forced funds to spend more money on producing the same outsize returns.

And given that these funds utilise a so-called pass-through expenses model, aka when a manager passes on all costs to their end investors rather than an annual flat fee, investors aren’t too jazzed about shouldering the extra costs.

The platforms’ rapid growth in recent years and a scarcity of the kind of specialised risk-takers who can handle the job has also unleashed a fierce battle for talent, driving pay for top traders sky-high and footing investors with the bill.

One hedge fund investor outlined the fate of multi-managers into two scenarios: either “someone gets pummelled . . . or they lose their edge”.

An uptick in “crowded trades” means these funds are inextricably linked whether they like it or not. A trade gone wrong could ripple across the market. Or, in a less dramatic turn of events, the strategies become so mainstream that profits become unsustainable.

Even Griffin, whose last year topped Bridgewater’s Ray Dalio as the most successful hedge fund manager of all time, acknowledged that the end of an era may be on the horizon.

“Clearly right now the multi-strategy managers are very much in vogue. When you’re most popular is probably when you’re reaching the top of the cycle,” he told the FT.

FT : China Construction Bank warns of pressure on profit margin

China Construction Bank warns of pressure on profit margin
Concerns mount about health of country’s $56tn banking system after cuts to key lending rate
China Construction Bank, the country’s second largest by assets, has warned that its profit margin will stay under pressure this year as concerns mount about the health of the country’s $56tn banking system.

The lender is the first state bank in China to report its second-quarter results. Five of the country’s biggest banks are expected to file earnings in the coming days.

Beijing has tried to balance its desire to stimulate the economy — by reducing borrowing costs — with the need to preserve the stability of China’s banking system.

Lenders this week held the five-year loan prime rate, which underpins mortgage rates, while the one-year rate was cut by 10 basis points rather than an anticipated 15 basis points.

First-half net profit at CCB rose 3.36 per cent year on year to Rmb167bn ($23bn) by the end of June. This is slower than the 5.4 per cent growth seen in the first half of 2022. The net interest margin, a key profitability gauge, stood at 1.79 per cent at the end of June, down from 1.83 per cent at the end of the first quarter and 2.02 per cent at the end of 2022.

Cuts to the loan prime rate have put sector-wide pressure on banks’ profit margins, said Sheng Liurong, chief financial officer at CCB.

“The deterioration of [the net interest margin] will be slower in the second half, as the central bank sounded out support for profitability,” said Sheng, referring to a recent People’s Bank of China report in which the central bank called for lenders to make a “reasonable profit”.

“But the margin will stay under pressure as [the loan prime rate] keeps lowering down and the central bank guides for lower rates on outstanding mortgages.

“The decline in [the loan prime rate] will put some pressure on bank’s net interest margin. But according our preliminary stress test, the impact will be roughly offset by the decline in deposit interest rates.”

A rush to pre-pay mortgages, another pressure point in profitability for the bank, peaked in April at CCB, according to the lender.

Tian Guoli, chair of CCB, downplayed concerns about the bank’s exposure to the property market.

“The market might have thought CCB is falling victim to the property market turbulence, as we relied heavily on mortgages and other property loan business, but the situation is quite the opposite,” Tian told reporters and analysts at an earnings briefing in Hong Kong on Thursday.

“We changed the focus of our property business into the rental housing sector six years ago, and lowered the proportion of loans lent directly to the developers,” he added. “This now fits well with the nation’s policy.”

Another risk for the banking sector is exposure to China’s indebted local governments. Banks could be hit if there are large-scale debt swaps and loan restructuring.

“Debt swaps are actually credit-positive for banks, as the borrowers’ credibility profiling is enhanced and the debt becomes obligations of higher provincial governments,” said Nicholas Zhu, banking analyst with Moody’s Investors Service.

“But if there’s new loan expectation . . . along with the debt swaps, that could be credit-negative because some of the local projects might not be commercially sustainable deals for banks.”

>>> US After Hours Summary: AFRM +6.7%, WDAY +3.3%, ULTA +2.2% higher on earning

After Hours Summary: AFRM +6.7%, WDAY +3.3%, ULTA +2.2% higher on earnings; DOMO -21.8%, MRVL -4%, JWN -3.2%, INTU -1.8% lower on earnings
After Hours Gainers:
Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: AFRM +6.7%, WDAY +3.3%, ULTA +2.2%, GPS +0.4%
Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: GRCL +2.4% (stock offering by selling shareholders), AMRX +1.4% (JAMA Neurology publishes phase 3 results of IPX203), WOLF +1.1% (Director bought 5000 shares), VSAT +1.1% (confirms satellite suffered a power subsystem anomaly; does not impact ongoing customer services), OC +0.5% (CFO to resign, names new CFO)
After Hours Losers:
Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: DOMO -21.8%, PAGS -6.4%, MRVL -4%, JWN -3.2%, INTU -1.8%
Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: HE -4.6% (suspends dividend; also Maui County suing HE over fires according to AP), DOCN -3.2% (CEO to step down, reaffirms Q3 and FY23 guidance), VMD -0.8% (files $150 mln mixed shelf securities offering), BIP -0.7% (TRTN shareholders vote to approve acquisition by BIP), KNTK -0.2% (names new CFO)

>>> US Close -1,08% S&P -1,35% Nasdaq -1,87% RUssell -1,27%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The major indices closed with sizable losses on the heels of NVIDIA's (NVDA 471.74, +0.58, +0.1%) blowout earnings report that was replete with much better than expected Q3 guidance and a new $25 billion share buyback plan. Things looked different at the open, though, with many stocks building on yesterday's gains.

Mega cap stocks rolled over quickly, however, and never regained their opening momentum, which weighed heavily on the broader market. Ultimately, the major indices closed near their lows of the day, which left the S&P 500 below 4,400.

The disappointing price action after NVIDIA's report likely caught many participants by surprise and became its own downside catalyst, which invited increased selling interest. The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK), which had been up as much as 0.9% at its high, registered a 2.0% loss today. The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP), which had been up as much as 0.6% earlier, closed with a 1.0% loss.

Weak semiconductor stocks were another overhang for the broader market, falling prone to a sell-the-news reaction. The PHLX Semiconductor Index sank 3.4%. Even NVDA, which had been up as much 6.6% today, closed near its low of the day with a measly 0.1% gain.

Other notable laggards included Dow component Boeing (BA 217.31, -11.27, -4.9%), which said a new flaw found in the 737 MAX will slow deliveries in the near term, T-Mobile (TMUS 133.32, -3.01, -2.2%), which said it is going to cut approximately 7% of its staff, and Dollar Tree Stores (DLTR 123.88, -18.34, -12.9%), which disappointed with its Q3 outlook.

All 11 S&P 500 sectors closed in the red with losses ranging from 0.2% (financials) to 2.2% (information technology).

Treasury yields settled slightly higher, keeping pressure on stocks, following another encouraging initial jobless claims report and ahead of Fed Chair Powell's speech at the Jackson Hole Symposium on Friday about the economic outlook. The 2-yr note yield rose eight basis points to 5.01% and the 10-yr note yield rose four basis points to 4.24%.

  • Nasdaq Composite: +28.6% YTD
  • S&P 500: +14.0% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +5.8% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +4.8% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +2.9% YTD
Reviewing today's economic data:
  • Initial jobless claims decreased by 10,000 to 230,000 (Briefing.com consensus 240,000) for the week ending August 19 while continuing jobless claims decreased by 9,000 to 1.702 million for the week ending August 12.
    • The key takeaway from the report is that the leading indicator of initial claims is still leading the market to believe that the labor market remains tight, which is something that won't escape the Fed's eye.
  • Durable goods orders declined 5.2% month-over-month in July (consensus -4.0%). Excluding transportation, durable goods orders increased 0.5% month-over-month ( consensus 0.2%).
    • The key takeaway from the report, other than July's weakness was driven predominately by transportation, was that business spending transpired at a tepid pace, evidenced by the 0.1% increase in new orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft.
  • Weekly EIA Natural Gas Inventories showed a build of 18 bcf versus a build of 35 bcf last week.
Friday's economic calendar features:
  • 10:00 ET: Final August University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment ( consensus 71.2; prior 71.2)
  • 10:05 ET: Fed Chairman Powell's Speech at the Jackson Hole Symposium

FT : Norwegian/Fredriksen: shares lack lift even with lighter debt payload

Norwegian/Fredriksen: shares lack lift even with lighter debt payload
The shipping magnate might have hoped for a better return two years after restructuring

Norway-born shipping magnate John Fredriksen has form in using debt to fund growth. With Norwegian Air Shuttle he has done the opposite, injecting much-needed equity from 2019 onward to clean up a messy balance sheet. His Geveran Trading has since become the top shareholder, with a 11.9 per cent holding.

Tossing out the debt baggage got the low-cost carrier off the ground again. Unfortunately, the market has a clear fear of flying Norwegian.

Second-quarter results highlighted the recovery since a forced restructuring in 2021, including talk of a dividend. Net debt at June was NKr3.7bn ($345mn), just over half expected ebitda. Compare that with NKr58bn it held in 2019.

Four years on, after a painful debt restructuring and plenty more equity from Fredriksen, a boom in air travel has produced a quarterly operating profit of NKr538mn. Ignore last year’s NKr2bn refund of jet prepayments by Boeing, and that turns round a loss.

Direction of travel matters more. Norwegian garnered about a tenth more passengers in the second quarter than last year at 5.6mn. Strong bookings this summer and into October augur well. Norwegian may be able pass on any cost inflation that boosted revenues.

Norwegian is not just soaring on powerful updrafts. It aims to grow its dominant Nordic position, just as rival Sweden’s SAS copes with its own bankruptcy. Norwegian last month agreed to acquire local short-haul airline Widerøe for NKr1.1bn. Price-killer Ryanair has taken note, opening a new base in Copenhagen for flights into Europe.

Two years after the restructuring Fredriksen might have hoped for a better return. The share price has gone nowhere. Most of Europe’s airlines look cheap these days, and Norwegian more so. On an enterprise value just two times forward ebitda, the stock trades about a third below peers. A bounce in oil prices since June has hurt airline stocks.

A long-promised travel boom has finally materialised. But investors have chosen to visit other sectors instead.

FT : Head of Lazard in Sweden charged with aggravated bribery

Head of Lazard in Sweden charged with aggravated bribery
Case relates to 2015 acquisition of Swiss vacuum business by Atlas Copco

The head of Lazard in Sweden has been charged with aggravated bribery linked to a takeover of a Swiss company by engineering group Atlas Copco.

Swedish prosecutors allege that Gustaf Slettengren paid a bribe of €138,000 in 2016 to a prominent board member of OC Oerlikon Corporation for information as part of the sale by the Swiss group of its vacuum business to Atlas for €486mn the previous year.

Prosecutors have asked the district court to fine Lazard itself SKr1.5mn ($140,000) over the matter because of Slettengren’s status at the firm.

“The crime is serious considering that the bribe is of a very significant value,” prosecutor Leif Görts wrote in a court filing. “Gustaf Slettengren has, as managing director of the company, the authority to represent the company, make decisions on its behalf, and thus has a leading position.”

The payment to the board member Hans Ziegler was “improper”, Görts added, as it constituted “compensation for board information” he provided to the Lazard group, to be used “in connection with Lazard’s assignment to assist in a business acquisition” between Atlas and Oerlikon.

Slettengren did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court document said he denied the allegations.

The bank said: “Lazard has co-operated fully with the investigation, and we await the outcome of the individual’s judicial proceeding.”

Atlas Copco said it did not comment on an ongoing case to which it was not a party.

Ziegler, a well-known director of a number of Swiss and German industrial companies, was convicted in 2021 in what was regarded as the biggest insider trading case ever in Switzerland. He received a suspended prison sentence of 22 months, a small fine, and confiscation of profits of SFr2mn ($2.3mn).

Swiss prosecutors alleged he used his insider knowledge about 11 companies to amass the profits through personal trading and passing on information to Lazard. A former Lazard banker was also convicted in the case but both were cleared of any bribery charges.

Swedish prosecutors said that the Covid-19 pandemic had delayed their investigation, and meant that any penalty would be lower than if the charges had been brought in a more timely manner.

Lazard has claimed that there is “extensive corporate secrecy” involved in the investigative report, according to the court documents, and has asked for confidentiality. Görts disputes this claim and is pushing for the case to be heard in public.

Atlas Copco has the highest market capitalisation of a listed company based in Sweden, and used the Oerlikon takeover to boost its vacuum business, one of its biggest growth drivers in recent years.

Le Monde : Vous pouvez partager un article en cliquant sur les icônes de partage

D’Evgueni Prigojine à son garde du corps, ce que révèle la liste des passagers de l’avion qui s’est écrasé
Grâce à des documents internes au Groupe Wagner, « Le Monde » recense le profil des victimes probables du crash : des hauts responsables du groupe de mercenaires, et des proches du clan Prigogine, son fondateur, également enregistré sur le vol.

Quelques heures seulement après le crash d’un jet privé Embraer RA-02795 près de Kujenkino, au nord-ouest de Moscou, le 23 août, des chaînes Telegram russophones s’affolent : la liste des sept passagers et des trois membres d’équipage vient d’être publiée par l’agence fédérale de l’aviation. Le nom d’Evgueni Prigojine y est inscrit.
Lire aussi le récit : Article réservé à nos abonnés L’annonce de la mort d’Evgueni Prigojine, un signal pour l’élite russe
Ajouter à vos sélections Ajouter à vos sélections

Le chef des mercenaires Wagner n’est pas le seul cadre du groupe enregistré sur ce vol. D’autres personnalités, parfois haut placées au sein de l’organisation, y figurent également. Grâce à des données ouvertes ainsi qu’à des fuites de documents internes à Wagner, Le Monde a pu éclairer le profil de ces passagers.
Evgueni Prigojine
C’est le chef du Groupe Wagner. Après plusieurs années à le nier, Evgueni Prigojine a finalement reconnu en septembre 2022 avoir fondé le groupe de mercenaires, en 2014. Depuis le début de l’invasion russe en Ukraine, en février 2022, il n’a cessé de prendre la parole pour défendre ses hommes ; jusqu’à s’opposer ouvertement au ministère de la défense russe.

Le 23 juin, lui et une partie de ses mercenaires se rebellent et prennent la direction de Moscou. La mutinerie, avortée, s’est soldée par l’exil d’une partie de ses troupes en Biélorussie.
Dmitri Outkine
IMAGE : MYROTVORETS
C’est un personnage-clé du système Wagner. Né en juin 1970, cet ancien membre des forces spéciales russes part combattre en Syrie en 2013, avec le « Corps slave », un groupe de mercenaires russes. A son retour, il est arrêté avec ses camarades de combat par le FSB, les services de sécurité intérieure : le mercenariat est officiellement interdit par la Russie. Dmitri Outkine échappe à une condamnation par la justice.
La suite de son parcours est plus floue : comment, dans quel contexte et pourquoi rencontre-t-il Evgueni Prigojine ? Dès 2014, il commence à diriger des soldats payés par Evgueni Prigojine, d’après Dossier Center, un groupe d’enquêteurs financé par l’homme d’affaires et dissident russe Mikhaïl Khodorkovski. Dmitri Outkine, qui rend compte directement à Evgueni Prigojine, adopte alors son surnom, « Wagner », qui sera bientôt utilisé pour nommer le groupe tout entier. Depuis, le Groupe Wagner n’a cessé d’étendre ses activités en Ukraine, au Moyen-Orient et en Afrique, longtemps avec l’aval et la complicité du Kremlin.
Le Monde Application
La Matinale du Monde
Chaque matin, retrouvez notre sélection de 20 articles à ne pas manquer
Télécharger l’application
Dans un document interne consulté par Le Monde, Dmitri Outkine, nom de guerre « Neuvième », est listé comme « commandant » d’Evro Polis en 2021, l’entité écran avec laquelle les mercenaires signaient leurs contrats avant de partir en Syrie. Dmitri Outkine est resté jusqu’au bout au cœur de la machine Wagner.
Ajouter à vos sélections Ajouter à vos sélections
Valeri Tchekalov
IMAGE : OK.RU
Cet homme d’affaires de 47 ans occupait, selon Dossier Center, une place importante au sein du Groupe Wagner : il y était responsable du service de sécurité et du soutien logistique des mercenaires. Surnommé « Rover » et détenteur du matricule M-2444, il gérait les projets d’exploitation de ressources naturelles, notamment de pétrole, dans les pays où le Groupe Wagner était actif. A travers sa société Neva, il dirigeait Evro Polis.
Depuis le mois de juillet, il était sous sanctions américaines pour avoir agi au nom d’Evgueni Prigojine, lui-même sanctionné depuis 2019, et pour avoir facilité des livraisons d’armes vers la Russie. « C’est l’employé le plus proche de Prigojine depuis plus de quinze ans, explique Denis Korotkov, membre du Dossier Center. Il était responsable de nombreux projets d’affaire, bien au-delà de ceux liés à Wagner. »
Evgueni Makarian
PHOTO : DOSSIER CENTER
Né en 1985, Evgueni Makarian a rejoint les mercenaires en 2016, sous le matricule M-2300, d’après des documents internes au Groupe Wagner consultés par Le Monde. Evgueni Makarian est également listé comme membre de la 4e section d’Assaut. C’est ce groupe de mercenaires qui a été bombardé par l’armée américaine à Khasham, en Syrie, en février 2018, d’après des informations de Dossier Center.
Sergueï Propoustine
PHOTO : MYROTVORETS
En octobre 2020, Sergueï Propoustine faisait partie du Groupe Wagner sous le matricule М-0394, d’après un document interne consulté par Le Monde. Agé de 44 ans au moment du crash, il a, d’après Dossier Center, rejoint les rangs de l’organisation en 2015, après avoir combattu pendant la seconde guerre de Tchétchénie. Il y est baptisé du nom de guerre « Kedr » (« Cèdre »).
Alexandre Totmine
PHOTO : COMPTE INSTAGRAM
S’il existe peu d’informations sur cet homme, Le Monde a pu retrouver sa trace dans des documents internes du Groupe Wagner. Alexandre Totmine y a pour nom de guerre « Tot », et est enregistré au sein de l’organisation sous le matricule M-5534. Le centre MyRotvorets, qui liste une partie des mercenaires du Groupe Wagner, affirme qu’Alexandre Totmine a servi au Soudan, où le groupe est présent depuis 2017 pour exploiter de l’or.
Selon un média russe qui a récolté des témoignages de ses proches, Alexandre Totmine aurait commencé sa carrière au sein des forces spéciales russes avant de rejoindre le groupe de mercenaires. Il serait récemment devenu garde du corps d’Evgueni Prigojine.
Jusqu’à ces dernières semaines, il publiait régulièrement sur Instagram des photos de lui en Russie, notamment à Saint-Pétersbourg.
Nikolaï Matousseïev
Pour le moment, les données sont trop parcellaires pour établir le profil de ce passager. « Probablement un vidéaste », indique au Monde Denis Korotkov, de Dossier Center.

Les trois membres de l’équipage
Karimov Roustam, commandant.
Levchine Alexeï, copilote.
Kristina Raspopova, hôtesse de l’air.

FT : Rishi Sunak failed to correctly declare wife’s stake in company, says watch

Rishi Sunak failed to correctly declare wife’s stake in company, says watchdog
Prime minister apologises after parliamentary commissioner concludes that shareholding should have been disclosed to MPs

Rishi Sunak failed to correctly declare his wife’s financial interest in a child-minding agency that could profit from government policy changes, a watchdog has concluded.

Daniel Greenberg, parliamentary commissioner for standards, said the UK prime minister’s failure stemmed from “confusion” about the relevant rules and was therefore an “inadvertent” mistake.

Sunak said he accepted Greenberg’s ruling and apologised for the error. The prime minister will not face further action.

Greenberg began a probe into Sunak in April after the prime minister, while being questioned by MPs, did not declare his wife Akshata Murty was a shareholder in Koru Kids, a company that registers childminders.

Koru was one of six agencies listed by the government for childminders to use, and was set to benefit from a pilot programme for incentive payments announced in the March Budget.

Sunak discussed the government’s policy to provide payments to encourage people to become childminders — especially if they used one of the six agencies — at a meeting of the House of Commons liaison select committee in March.

Asked by Catherine McKinnell, a Labour member of the committee, if he had any declarations to make, Sunak said “No. All my disclosures are declared in the normal way.”

Greenberg said his investigation had concluded Murty’s shareholding was a relevant interest that should have been declared to MPs.

The commissioner said Sunak was aware of his wife’s stake in Koru before he wrote a letter in April to Sir Bernard Jenkin, Conservative chair of the liaison committee, and failed to declare the stake.

Greenberg said MPs are expected to draw attention to any “registered or unregistered interests on almost any occasion” — including those of partners — when they could have a potential influence on their actions. 

Sunak had registered his wife’s shareholding in Koru in a private record of all ministers’ interests overseen by civil servants.

But details of the stake had not been included in a publicly available list of ministers’ interests. This list is less comprehensive than the private record compiled by officials.

Sunak had also not included his wife’s shareholding in the register of MPs’ interests because it did not fall under the relevant categories to be disclosed. 

Following Greenberg’s investigation, Sunak’s entry in the list of ministers’ interests has been updated with a footnote about Murty’s shareholding in Koru. 

Greenberg said Sunak had “confused the concept of registration with the concept of declaration” and therefore the “failure to declare arose out of this confusion and was accordingly inadvertent on the part of Mr Sunak”.

The prime minister, in a letter to Greenberg, said his wife’s shareholding in Koru was worth only about 1 per cent of the company’s total value, adding she was not a director and had no decision making role in the agency.

Sunak added that three independent advisers had concluded his wife’s stake did not require full publication on the list of ministers’ interests.

“My comments made during the . . . March 2023 liaison committee hearing and subsequent letter to the chair, were and remain correct,” he said.

Sunak added he had not been advised about the government’s childcare policy before its announcement in the Budget.

“Nor did I attend any ministerial or department meetings in advance of the Budget to discuss the mechanics of the scheme, nor the child-minding agencies to be referenced on the government website,” he added.

FT : China capitalises on US sanctions in fight to dethrone dollar

China capitalises on US sanctions in fight to dethrone dollar
Beijing uses developing world chagrin over Washington’s weaponisation of greenback to push global renminbi

Argentina faced a familiar problem at the end of last month. The South American nation was struggling to repay the IMF $2.7bn from its latest $44bn bailout.

The solution, however, was unconventional. With its net dollar reserves in the red, Buenos Aires settled the payment partly in renminbi. “Argentina will not use a single dollar from its reserves to make the payment,” economy minister Sergio Massa crowed.

The transfer in the Chinese currency was only Argentina’s second to the IMF. “These are indications of broader changes happening in the international financial system, which will become permanent,” a senior official at the Argentine economy ministry said. “These shifts will take time, but they will not be reversed.”

On the other side of the globe, Bangladesh also alighted on the renminbi as the answer to a problem it had in April: how to make stalled payments to Russia for a nuclear power plant. Dollars were not an option because of US sanctions and rouble payment was not feasible for Dhaka, so the two nations opted for the renminbi instead.

Developing economies have long chafed at the dominance of the US dollar in international trade and finance, particularly as America’s share of the global economy has more than halved since the second world war and new powers such as China, India and Brazil emerged.

“De-dollarisation” has been on the anti-imperialists’ radar for decades but the overwhelming power of the US currency meant it amounted to little more than a slogan until recently, economists say.

But with the expansion of US economic sanctions and the explosion of new technologies for international payments, cracks are starting to appear in the dollar’s once-impregnable position. And China, with its embrace of the digital renminbi, or e-yuan, and its drive to develop an alternative global payments system, is hoping to take advantage.

The aim is not to depose the dollar but to chip away at its dominance — and, crucially, to create enough space for China’s economic survival if the US one day targets it with the type of sanctions it has imposed on Russia.

“The US uses its financial power as a geopolitical weapon and the hegemony of the US dollar is a big part of this,” said one Chinese official, who declined to be identified. “If the US targets any developing country with sanctions through the payments system, we will suffer.”

The list of individuals and entities sanctioned by the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac) now runs to 2,206 pages and lists more than 12,000 names. Their use has accelerated sharply in the past decade as successive US presidents have opted for an apparently low-cost, bloodless solution to foreign policy problems.

“The extraterritoriality implied is frightening other governments,” said Christopher Sabatini, Latin America fellow at Chatham House. “When you have a quarter of the world economy under some form of sanctions and the threat that they can be used against any country at any time, that changes the game.”

Agathe Demarais, author of Backfire: How sanctions reshape the world against US interests, traces three key developments: Iran being banned from the Swift global financial messaging network in 2012, economic sanctions on Russia in 2014 after its annexation of Crimea — making it by far the biggest nation ever sanctioned — and the US trade war with China starting in 2018.

“These three events really accelerated the shift in thinking of rogue countries . . . to turn away from western financial mechanisms,” she said.


Greatly expanded western sanctions have not just upset authoritarian states. They have also angered emerging powers such as Brazil, which believe the international financial system should not be weaponised.

“Today there is a lot of discomfort with the international financial system based on the dollar,” Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s top foreign policy aide Celso Amorim told the Financial Times. “The main factor behind that is sanctions.”

Eswar Prasad, professor at Cornell University, agrees that “practically every country around the world, including rivals as well as traditional allies of the US, would dearly love to ditch the dollar-denominated financial system,” though he points out that this is not easy.

The difficulty for emerging powers seeking an alternative is that the dollar is so deeply embedded in the international financial system. Economists have long held that the “network effect” of such widespread dominance will doom any effort to replace the dollar. But across the financial system, China has been chipping away at the US currency, offering its own alternatives.

Beijing’s focus has been to gradually dilute the power of Belgium’s Swift, the global platform through which about 90 per cent of money moved across borders is arranged. China’s strategy to achieve this is multipronged, persistent and starting to show important results, analysts said.

One part is to create a larger pool of renminbi liquidity in offshore capital markets, so as to increase the supply of Chinese currency to traders and investors.

Another is the establishment of the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (Cips), a Chinese rival to Chips, the world’s largest private sector dollar clearing and settlement system, and to Swift. Total settlements on Cips jumped more than a fifth to Rmb97tn in 2022.

Other strands are the international launch of the digital renminbi, which allows for transactions to take place without going through Chips or Swift.

“That is going to become a totally different system . . . completely cut away from the western financial regulators,” said Zongyuan Zoe Liu at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

“The e-yuan coupled with Cips would be quite a potent force for anti-western sanctions because in order for a sanction to be triggered [the US authorities] have to know the information about the transaction.”

China’s desire to promote its own currency has been stymied by the fact that it is not fully convertible. Nevertheless, in March the renminbi surpassed the dollar and became the most-used currency in China’s own cross-border payments, according to China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (Safe).

Stephen Jen, a former Morgan Stanley currency expert, said in a note in April that the dollar was losing its international reserve status much faster than generally accepted. When adjusted for exchange rate movements, he said its share of global reserves had fallen to 58 per cent in 2023 from 73 per cent in 2001.

While there are signs of real progress, other analysts caution that Beijing is still several years away from being able to even dream of breaking the US dollar’s “hegemony”.

One success has come in offshore capital markets. Cross-border debt denominated in renminbi has boomed this year with sales of “panda bonds” by foreign issuers rising to Rmb75bn ($10.4bn) so far — already surpassing the full-year record set in 2021, according to Chinese data provider Wind.

Issuance of renminbi-denominated “dim sum” bonds in Hong Kong is also at a new high over the same period, having topped Rmb320bn, according to data from Bloomberg.

In energy markets, where dollar pricing is the global norm, President Xi Jinping told Gulf Arab leaders at a summit in Saudi Arabia last December that he wanted to see the Chinese currency used to trade oil and gas. The first renminbi-settled LNG transaction on the Shanghai exchange was reported in March between China’s national oil company and France’s Total.

Emerging powers have also been quick off the mark with digital payments systems, such as WeChat Pay in China, India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI), Pix in Brazil or Kenya’s mobile money service M-Pesa.

The west is lagging behind, with the US and Europe still examining the possibility of digital currencies and payments systems still dominated by Visa and Mastercard.

“China has pilot projects to settle bilateral trade in e-yuan with Thailand and the UAE [United Arab Emirate],” said Demarais. “This is a clear case of countries using technology to pre-empt sanctions, and China really wants to have a first-mover advantage.”

Few believe the dollar is likely to be toppled from its perch soon. But they do see an increasingly fragmented international financial system, with the renminbi playing a bigger role. All this will satisfy emerging powers’ desire to diversify.

“This is less about the dollar losing its position as the world’s top currency,” said Daniel McDowell, a professor at Syracuse University. “But I genuinely do believe there are risks here for US power, especially the ability to use sanctions against China.”