(BFW) LVMH Says Is ‘Relatively Confident’ on 2015



LVMH Says Is ‘Relatively Confident’ on 2015
2015-02-03 17:39:48.390 GMT


By Heather Burke and Andrew Roberts
(Bloomberg) -- LVMH sees rebound in cognac volume in China
in 2015, according to comments in presentation documents.
* 4Q organic sales growth 13% in U.S., 7% in Japan, 5% in
Europe
* 4Q organic rev. declined 6% in Asia
* 4Q organic rev. by unit (from presentation documents):
* Wines & Spirits down 1%, Bloomberg est. down 3.2%
* Fashion & Leather Goods up 4%, est. 0%
* Perfumes & Cosmetics up 7%, est. up 6%
* Watches & Jewelry up 3%, est. up 4%
* Selective Retailing up 8%, est. up 5%
* Selective Retailing up 8%, est. up 5%</li></ul>
* LVMH Key Quarterly Earnings Metrics: Analyzer
* Earlier: LVMH Earnings Miss Estimates as Chinese Spend Less
on Luxury

Link to Company News:MC FP <Equity> CN <GO>

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporters on this story:
Heather Burke in London at +44-20-3525-2044 or
hburke2@bloomberg.net;
Andrew Roberts in Paris at +33-1-5365-5015 or
aroberts36@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-3525-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net
Andrew Rummer

(BFW) MORE: S&P Cuts Various EU Bank Ratings on Unlikely Govt Support



MORE: S&P Cuts Various EU Bank Ratings on Unlikely Govt Support
2015-02-03 17:55:10.97 GMT


By Laura Kaster
(Bloomberg) -- S&P takes various rating actions on certain
systemically important U.K., German, and Austrian banks to
reflect that extraordinary government support to the benefit of
senior creditors is now unlikely; unresolved questions about how
legislation may operate in practice.
* Lowered by long-term ratings by one or two notches:
Barclays, Credit Suisse, HSBC Holdings, HSBC USA and Lloyds
Banking Group
* Outlooks on these companies are now stable, with the
exception of Lloyds, which is positive
* Outlooks on these companies are now stable, with the
exception of Lloyds, which is positive</li></ul>
* Lowered long-term ratings by one or two notches, lowered
short-term rating, outlooks now stable: Royal Bank of
Scotland, Standard Chartered
* Placed on CreditWatch with negative implications on long-
term ratings: Standard Chartered, Royal Bank of Scotland,
Commerzbank
* Placed on CreditWatch with negative implications the long,
short-term ratings: Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, Nationwide
Building Society, Santander UK , Deutsche Bank, NORD/LB
Covered Finance Bank, UniCredit Bank, Erste Group Bank,
Raiffeisen Zentralbank Oesterreich and UniCredit Bank
Austria



For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Laura Kaster in New York at +1-212-617-9604 or
lkaster2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Arie Shapira at +1-212-617-1488 or
ashapira3@bloomberg.net

FT : US economy cannot go it alone, says Jack Lew

The US economy appears to have entered a period of “self-sustaining” growth, but governments in other major economies need to do more to stimulate demand, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew warned on Tuesday.
In a written testimony to Congress, Mr Lew said US growth of 2.5 per cent last year and robust forecasts for this year indicated that the US was set to grow “substantially faster than all of the other advanced economies combined” in 2015. But he signalled US concern about the health of the world economy as a whole.

“While the recovery in the US economy has helped to drive global growth, the rest of the world cannot depend on the United States to be the sole engine of growth,” Mr Lew said.
He cited a G20 pledge last year for more to be done to stimulate domestic demand around the world but hinted at US frustration that other major economies were not doing more.
“Our strength allows us to maintain our leadership in the global community, and while we must lead by example, we cannot do it alone,” he told the hearing.
The US was the only major economy apart from Spain to have its growth outlook upgraded last month by the International Monetary Fund in an update to its economic forecasts.
While the US economy decelerated in the fourth quarter of 2014, expanding at an annualised 2.6 per cent pace compared with 5 per cent in the previous period, its growth rate was still faster than the average set in the first 21 quarters of the recovery.
That strong performance contrasts sharply with other major economies, including notably the eurozone, which has been heading into deflation. The US is expected by the IMF to grow at three times the rate of the euro area this year.

Mr Lew gave voice to broader fears among US officials that the rebound in the US could be curtailed by sluggish demand overseas. That worry was formally flagged up by the US Federal Reserve last week when it added “international developments” to a list of swing factors informing its interest rate policy.
With central banks elsewhere cutting interest rates — and the European Central Bank having embarked on quantitative easing last month — the US dollar has been surging, creating headwinds for US exporters. The Fed has been laying the ground for a rate increase this year from the current 0 per cent to 0.25 per cent level, with a move expected in June or later in the year.
That could put further upward pressure on the dollar, prompting complaints from big US companies whose earnings are being squeezed by the rising currency.
Mr Lew’s warning came a day after the administration of President Barack Obama unveiled a highly political budget proposal that calls for Congress to loosen the pursestrings and deliver more help to a struggling American middle class while also continuing to reduce the deficit.
Mr Lew also defended an administration proposal for a one-off 14 per cent tax on overseas profits of US-based multinationals and other plans for corporate tax reform.
Calling the president’s plan for corporate tax reform “pro-growth”, Mr Lew said the US needed to do more to make sure the tax system did not encourage US businesses to relocate their operations overseas.
“Tax reform must seek to balance the need to reduce tax incentives to locate overseas with the need for US companies to be able to compete overseas for the investments and operations absolutely necessary to serve and expand into foreign markets in ways that benefit US jobs and economic growth,” he said.

>>>Smith & Nephew to be acquired? Stryker most likely buyer



From: LCHEKROUN@makor-cm.com At: Feb 3 2015 15:25:30
To: LAURENT CHEKROUN (MAKOR SECURITIES LLP)
Subject: Fwd:>>>Smith & Nephew to be acquired? Stryker most likely buyer

Smith & Nephew to be acquired? Stryker most likely buyer


In this pre-event note we try to answer the following:

 

1. Why would Stryker acquire and indeed pay a hefty premium for Smith& Nephew? and

2. What that premium would look like?

 

Around Christmas (late December), rumours linked Stryker to Smith&Nephew.

Such rumours have been ongoing for years BUT we show in our note how market shares have changed and Stryker is in need of acquisitions. Smith&Nephew is a very good fit.

January is the busiest month for Smith Nephew executives as they devote time to their FY report (Due Feb 5th).

We suggest that Q1 and in particular February is a key month for a formal approach if one is to be made because excecutive time is available for due dilligence meetings and because the bidder would want to work with the recent set of audited accounts (February) given the size of the acquistion.

We  conduct several valuation analyses including comparable company analysis, precedent transaction analysis and DCF modelling. We also analyse prior synergies when mergers occur in the sector

We conservatively conclude thatStryker may need to offer in excess of 1350p per Smith&Nephew share for the offer to be considered full value. 

And if a formal bid comesforth other suitors may also have a look

 

SN/ LN: Current share price:  1190p

Potential offer price: 1350p

 

Spread

Gross potential                 160p

% upside potential          13.5%

 

PDF attached

 

 

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up: ODP +18%, NBG +17.2%, WPZ +15.1%, CLF +11.9%, AUO +10.7%, SPLS +10.3%, CSIQ +10.2%, ESPR +10%, LC +9.6%, OCN +7.5%, EXXI +7.4%, CRNT +7.3%, LLNW +7.1%, IDTI +7.1%, RTEC +6.8%, BBEP +6.6%, FRO +6.1%, ADVS +5.5%, HW +5.2%, AN +5%, OAS +4.5%, RIG +4.2%, FN +4.2%, ANR +3.9%, FCX +3.2%, SSNC +3.1%, AGCO +3.1%, WLL +2.9%, LNKD +2.9%, RDS,A +2.8%, OI +2.8%, BHP +2.7%, PBR +2.7%, CLR +2.7%, ST +2%, CRC +1.9%, PLAY +1.7%, PLAY +1.7%, ACMP +1.6%, AGNC +1.6%, EMR +0.9%

Gapping down: RSH -33.4%, SSYS -25.1%, RCII -14.1%, ZIOP -9%, ONTX -6.6%, DDD -6.6%, XONE -5.9%, PBF -4%, PRLB -3.8%, FXCM -3.3%, SD -3.2%, MTSI -2.5%, LMNX -2.5%, PEGI -2.1%, SABR -2.1%, WEN -1.5%, ADM -1.3%, HIG -1.2%, NLY -0.7%, IMS -0.7%

>>> Shipments of iPhone devices to top 50 million units in 1Q15, say Taiwan make

Shipments of iPhone devices to top 50 million units in 1Q15, say Taiwan makers

Shipments of iPhone devices are expected to top 50 million units in the first quarter of 2015, increasing 14.4% from 43.7 million units shipped in the year earlier period, according to an estimate by sources in Taiwan's handset supply chain.

The estimate comes after Apple reported that it shipped 74.5 million iPhone devices in the fourth quarter of 2014, accounting for 51.2% of its total revenues of US$74.6 billion recorded in the quarter.

Demand for smartphones in the Greater China area during the upcoming Lunar New Year holidays will maintain sales of iPhone devices in the first quarter, the market watchers said.

Apple's sales in the Greater China area, mainly China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, totaled US$16.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, increasing 70% from a year earlier, according to company data.

The ratio of Asia-Pacific sales to Apple's total sales is expected to continue to rise, said the watchers.

Barron's : Byron Wien: the Beauty of Lower Oil Prices

Byron Wien: the Beauty of Lower Oil Prices
The Wall Street veteran discusses the geopolitical benefits of declining oil revenues for Russia and Iran.

The Ten Surprises of 2015 that I released a month ago have two prevailing themes. The more dominant is that the decline in the price of oil is generally a positive for the world.

It puts money in the pockets of consumers everywhere and it is likely to force Iran and Russia to be more conciliatory in geopolitical negotiations because both countries are suffering not only from the drop in the oil price, but also from the sanctions imposed on them.

The second theme is that in spite of notable economic problems in Europe, China and Japan, the United States equity market will have another good year.


(The definition of a surprise is an event which the average investor would only assign a one-in-three chance of happening, but which I believe is probable, having a better than 50% chance of taking place. While I usually I get five or six of the Surprises more or less “right,” I don’t create the list to get a high score, but rather to stretch my thinking and that of my readers.)

The first Surprise is that the Federal Reserve raises interest rates sooner than expected.

Investors are broadly in agreement that the first increase in short-term interest rates will occur around mid-year or later, but I believe we will see the Fed act sooner than that, probably in the first quarter. Many believe this is unlikely because Europe is near or in a recession and Japan is suffering as well. They reason that increased rates will only make the dollar stronger and hurt our trading partners.

The lower-than-expected wage increase component of the December employment report is another reason for deferring a rate increase. My view is that the Fed is most responsive to domestic data: the U.S. economy has been growing at 5% real during the last two quarters, unemployment has dropped below 6% and wages are starting to increase. Although inflation is not currently a problem, the increase in rates is likely to be small and more an indication of a change in policy focus than a vigorous attempt to slow down an overheating economy. I believe the dollar will not appreciate much more against the euro and the yen because goods from Europe and Japan are sufficiently competitive at present levels.

The most important part of this Surprise is that the change in Fed policy has little effect on long-term interest rates and the yield curve will flatten. There is so much liquidity throughout the world, seeking some level of safe return, that I don’t expect much of a rise in long-term interest rates. One negative effect of this move is the possibility that it may set off a short-term correction in the equity market. The Fed is no longer pursuing an accommodative monetary policy and the rise in short-term rates may be a cause for one of the inevitable periodic declines we experience every year. It usually takes several rate increases before a significant correction occurs (as set out in Edson Gould’s “three steps and stumble” rule).

Cyber-terrorism has been in the news and the second Surprise is that our luck runs out in protecting our major financial institutions from attack. Our enemies place a high priority on crippling our financial system. Invading the information structure of a major money center bank and forcing it to close for a period of five days, thereby depriving customers of the ability to deposit or withdraw funds, would accomplish that objective. Fear that our banks are vulnerable to cyber-attacks would reverberate throughout the economy. This Surprise is based on the view that the attackers are more able than the cyber-security specialists protecting these institutions. We have already seen the havoc that can be wrought by cyber-attacks with the Sony incident last Thanksgiving. This Surprise suggests more serious trouble lies ahead. There is nothing our enemies want more than to hobble the American economy and this would partly accomplish that goal.

In spite of rising short-term interest rates and cyber-security issues, I still believe 2015 will be a good year for United States equities. This is the third Surprise. I expect reasonable real growth of 3% from the economy in spite of slowdowns elsewhere in the world. Revenues should expand 4% and earnings 8% because of share buybacks, productivity, mergers and acquisitions and other factors.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 is selling at less than 16 times the consensus estimate of earnings for 2015 of $125, about the historical average. If the index were to trade at 19 times, well below the bubble range of 25 to 30 times, it would reach the 15% appreciation estimate. That is likely to make it the best-performing equity market among major industrial countries. A strong U.S. economy lies behind the earnings increase; housing and capital spending are expected to be important contributors to 2015 growth.

The European economy is the focus of the fourth Surprise. European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi has been talking about implementing quantitative easing for some time and now he is finally going to do it. The Surprise is that it has little impact and Europe remains on the brink of recession. There is some precedence for this in the U.S. experience. The Federal Reserve expanded its balance sheet from $1 trillion in 2008 to $4 trillion in 2014 and the increase mainly pushed stock prices higher and kept interest rates low. I estimate only 25% of the quantitative easing found its way into the real economy. The recovery took place as a result of natural, not monetary, forces in the business environment. I believe that the slowdown in Germany, resulting partly from diminished Russian trade, will have an impact on the rest of Europe and that the European stock market will be down in 2015.

In the fifth Surprise, I express similar concern about Japan. Shinzo Abe’s first two arrows, fiscal and monetary stimulus, looked like they were working and the country was showing reasonable growth. Most observers were curious to see the impact of the third arrow, structural reform, on the economy. As last year developed, the increase in the sales tax had a greater negative effect than expected and Japan went into a recession in the third quarter. A slowdown in China and other parts of the world also contributed to the weakness. Abe is determined to get the country back on a growth path and is prepared to step up the stimulus to accomplish this. He will suspend the second sales tax increase, which was scheduled for this year, and implement further measures. The Surprise is that it doesn’t work and Japan remains in recession during 2015. The Nikkei 225, not excessively valued, remains flat, but further weakness in the yen causes it to be down in dollars.

China is the subject of the sixth Surprise. Looking at the economic statistics being reported by the country, the official growth rate has been stated at over 7%, but credit expansion of 15%–20% annually is required to achieve it. This amount of credit growth is unsustainable in my view, and the surprise is that China faces up to the fact that growth has slowed and announces it to the world. The new leadership commits to rebalancing the economy toward the consumer and away from investment spending on infrastructure and state-owned enterprises. Recent reports indicate China has been spending heavily on projects like airports, highways, tunnels and rail transport; in a shift, what money is spent on infrastructure goes to air, water and ground pollution control rather than housing and transportation. The objective of rebalancing the economy is proceeding, with significant increases in service sector jobs. These pay less than those in manufacturing plants, so the buying power of those employed is not rising as fast as the number of workers employed. Nevertheless, more people in China are moving from an agricultural to an urban environment for work. While China’s growth rate is slowing, it is still impressive for the world’s second largest economy. It has probably reached the point where the law of large numbers makes faster growth difficult without excessive credit creation. I am not alarmed by the slowdown in China; I believe it was inevitable. I am encouraged by the effort to rebalance. In no case do I expect a housing collapse or a hard landing.

The drop in the price of oil has significant geopolitical as well as economic implications, and this is the subject of the seventh Surprise. I believe the decline in petroleum revenues will deepen Iran’s economic problems. For some time now, the people of Iran have been yearning for the sanctions to be lifted so they can benefit from the economic opportunities available elsewhere in the world. They see little in the nuclear weapons development program that would benefit the average Iranian. Recent comments by leaders in Iran indicate a possible softening of their weapons objective. Lower oil prices make this change even more likely. If Iran would agree to suspend its nuclear weapons effort in some meaningful way, this would be a positive for Middle East stability and the general world order.

The price of Brent slipping into the $40s would also have an important impact on the leadership of Russia. This is the eighth Surprise. The economy there was suffering even before the sanctions were imposed and the price of oil collapsed. Conditions have worsened since then. The country is running out of foreign exchange reserves and a crisis may be approaching. Some believe China may offer a bailout plan involving a prepayment for oil and gas deliveries, augmenting agreements already in place. I am skeptical. Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin, has said that his people can endure temporary hardship. I believe the situation is serious, the people are losing confidence in Putin, and he may become more willing to compromise on his territorial expansion plans and recognize the independence of Ukraine with a promise of some autonomy for Eastern Ukraine. If he agreed to comply with a twelve point program proposed four months ago, the sanctions could be lifted. At some point, Putin in his desperation complies, but he is humiliated in the process and resigns. Ruling Russia has proven to be exasperating for him and he decides to seek a less pressured life. Later on in the year, as demand from the developing world improves, the price of oil begins a steady climb back toward $70 for Brent.

I believe the sharp decline in oil prices has excessively upset the high yield market. Energy securities account for almost 20% of high yield and their decline has had an impact on everything in this asset class, creating a buying opportunity. The buying opportunity in energy securities is the ninth Surprise.

In the tenth and final Surprise I argue that the Republicans will try to position themselves as the party that rises above internal dissension so that it can get constructive legislation passed in Washington. I cite as examples the Keystone pipeline, the tax code and immigration. Obama has threatened to veto the pipeline and many think the pipeline is not necessary with oil prices low. Others believe the project will not create many jobs and is harmful to the environment. Many Republicans don’t want to support any of the various forms at tax reform other than reducing corporate taxes. Even more do not want to relax any aspect of immigration that provides relief to illegal entrants, even if they have children born here. Right after last November’s election, it looked like the Republicans’ primary objective was to repeal the Affordable Care Act. They now realize that might be futile and it would be better to prove to the American people that Republicans can improve life for them. They only lost the presidency by four points in 2012. If they could capture some portion of the Hispanic vote, which overwhelmingly supported Obama, their chance for victory would improve. Jeb Bush could help them accomplish this and he is likely to be the candidate.

In the period since the Surprises were announced, I have gotten some criticism that they were not bold enough. A few even believe several were consensus views and not at all surprises. There were those who thought the Fed would raise rates, but most thought it would be later in the year, not earlier as I believed. Many thought the market would rise, but not as much as 15%. Europe’s recession was expected, but few thought Mario Draghi’s stimulus would have little effect. Few thought China would admit to growing at less than 7%, although many saw the economy there softening. Most believe Shinzo Abe would get Japan’s economy growing again. Few thought Iran would negotiate a pullback from its nuclear development program or that Russia would recognize Ukraine’s independence and Putin would resign. A major money center bank closing because of cyber terrorism wasn’t on anyone’s list and the Republicans working together to get something done was given a low probability. So I believe the Surprises fulfilled their mind-stretching objective.

This year I have four Also Rans, which I didn’t believe had more than a 50% chance of happening or I did not think were as important as the ten I picked. The first one is that water becomes the focus of environmentalists, moving air pollution to second place. Large parts of the United States experience droughts, diminishing agricultural production. In China and India literally hundreds of millions of people are without safe drinking water, making them susceptible to disease. Conflict over water rights becomes an important political issue in Asia.

The second Also Ran involves Internet commerce. Commercial hotels and conventional taxi services didn’t complain about Airbnb and Uber when they were minor business irritants, but now that they are big global operations, pressure is increasing to make sure that each establishment and vehicle has the proper insurance and pays the appropriate fees and taxes. Making independent participants comply is difficult and this sector of stocks suffers a sharp correction.

In the third Also Ran, Brazil has a comeback. Dilma Rouseff becomes pro-business in order to improve the country’s growth and moves away from her socialist policies. The country has vast natural resources and a growing middle class, giving it considerable potential. Investors start accumulating Brazilian equities again.

Finally, in the last of the Also Rans, I suggest that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner candidate for President in 2016, bows out of the race. She very much wants to be the first woman to hold office, but she doesn’t want to lose. If Jeb Bush were the Republican candidate and attracts a reasonable number of Hispanic voters, and some liberals who are suspicious of Clinton’s ties to Wall Street and Hollywood don’t vote, the race could be very close. If she runs and wins, the difficulty of getting important legislation passed in a Republican Congress could also be exasperating and discourage her further. This combination of factors may cause her to withdraw, throwing the Democrats into frenetic confusion.

Now let’s see how the year turns out.

(BFW) *KOHN SAYS RISK THAT GREECE AND EURO AREA DON'T AGREE IS SMALL


BFW 02/03 10:26 *BOE'S KOHN SAYS U.K.'S FINANCIAL EXPOSURE TO GREECE IS `SMALL'
BFW 02/03 10:25 *BOE'S KOHN SAYS SITUATION WITH GREECE AND EURO AREA IS `RISKY'
BN 02/03 10:24 *BOE OFFICIAL DONALD KOHN SPEAKS AT LONDON PARLIAMENTARY HEARING
BFW 02/03 10:24 *BOE'S KOHN SAYS HE EXPECTS GREECE, EURO AREA TO MAKE AGREEMENT
BN 02/03 10:12 *BOE OFFICIAL TAYLOR MAKES COMMENTS TO LAWMAKERS IN LONDON
BFW 02/03 10:11 *BOE'S TAYLOR SAYS GEOPOLITICAL RISKS UNUSUALLY LARGE AT MOMENT

*KOHN SAYS RISK THAT GREECE AND EURO AREA DON'T AGREE IS SMALL
2015-02-03 10:28:04.335 GMT

--SCOTT HAMILTON

-0- Feb/03/2015 10:28 GMT