WSJ : The $50 Billion Question: Can Uber Deliver?

The $50 Billion Question: Can Uber Deliver?

Investors are counting on Uber to upend the delivery business much as it has for taxis, but progress has been slow so far

Uber Technologies Inc. became one of the world’s most valuable startups by creating a new way to transport millions of people in more than 300 cities. But using the same formula to upend the delivery business has turned into a slog.

For more than a year, the San Francisco company has been trying to build what its chief executive once called “an urban logistics fabric” that enables drivers who shuttle passengers with the tap of a smartphone to pick up food, grocery items and packages along the way. In a sign of Uber’s potential, it has more than 200,000 active drivers, roughly double the size of the delivery workforce at United Parcel Service Inc.
So far, though, an Uber same-day delivery program launched a year ago with plans to sign up dozens of retailers has announced partnerships with just six. And one of those, e-commerce company Gilt Groupe Inc., says its arrangement fell short of expectations, partly because Uber was unable to insure high-priced items sold through Gilt’s online store, according to a Gilt spokeswoman.

In recent months, Uber lost out on the opportunity to make deliveries in some cities for Apple Inc. and Starbucks Corp., which discussed tie-ups with Uber but then made deals with startup courier servicePostmates Inc., according to people familiar with the discussions. Popular food-ordering apps Eat24, owned by Yelp Inc., and GrubHub Inc. also held talks with Uber but haven’t reached any agreements.

A food-delivery service called UberEats, launched last fall to speed lunch and dinner items from popular restaurants to Uber users in parts of New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Toronto and Barcelona, sometimes has so few customers that drivers have to throw away food at day’s end.

Advertisement

Uber says it remains committed to making deliveries and still is in an early phase of testing new approaches to the business. “We will continue to experiment and test new products that benefit both customers and the cities in which we operate,” Jason Droege, who runs the delivery project, known internally as UberEverything, wrote in an email to the Journal.

A spokeswoman adds that response to UberEats “has been overwhelmingly positive.” The service could expand to as many as 15 cities in coming months.

Rivals of Uber in the nascent world of on-demand delivery also are betting that the smartphone era is breeding a new kind of shopper who will want many kinds of products delivered as quickly as the hailing of a car.

Investors in Uber are enthusiastic about the potential, valuing the privately held company at $41 billion in its last funding round. Uber is in talks to raise a new funding round at a valuation of $50 billion or more, people familiar with the matter have said, roughly equal to FedEx Corp.’s stock-market value.

“There’s nobody who has as big of a real-time logistics network than Uber,” says Jason Calacanis, a serial entrepreneur who was one of Uber’s first investors. “If they can make another business line work with this infrastructure, that could transform the business.”

Uber, which had revenue last year of roughly $400 million and is planning to invest more than $1 billion in China this year, hasn’t said publicly how big it hopes to become in the delivery business.

Bill Gurley, a partner at venture-capital firm Benchmark in San Francisco and director at Uber, says he has never seen a financial projection for Uber which includes revenue from deliveries. “This company is growing faster than any company I think there’s ever been in Silicon Valley, and that’s on the core product offering,” Mr. Gurley says.

A lukewarm burrito
Same-day delivery has become fiercely competitive, ranging from upstarts such as Instacart Inc. and Deliv Inc., which carry shipments from grocers and shopping-mall retailers, to technology giants Amazon.com Inc., eBay Inc. and Google Inc. Even Lyft Inc., Uber’s largest U.S. rival in ride-sharing, is exploring its own fast-delivery service, says a person familiar with the matter.

The business is a logistical quagmire. One recent evening, Jim Pekarek had 30 minutes to pick up a $7 burrito in San Francisco’s Mission District and deliver it to a customer four miles away.

Driving for ride-hailing service Sidecar Technologies Inc., Mr. Pekarek fetched the burrito from Taqueria Pancho Villa, hurried back to his car, parked halfway on a curb, and sped off. But his recipient was nowhere in sight and didn’t answer the phone.

After consulting a map, circling the block and talking to two customer-service representatives, Mr. Pekarek discovered there was a mix-up between 29th Street and 29th Avenue. He delivered the lukewarm burrito 30 minutes late to the customer, who had sent increasingly impatient text messages that included “Forget it.”

“I’m wondering how this makes financial sense,” says Mr. Pekarek, 33 years old, a videogame developer who picks up passengers and packages for Sidecar, based in San Francisco. Sidecar wouldn’t comment on its financial results.

FedEx offers same-day delivery in more than 20 markets, but such shipments are just a sliver of its overall business. Most customers are happy to wait a day or more for e-commerce shipments, according to Frederick W. Smith, FedEx’s chairman, president and chief executive.

“I think there’s just an urban mythology out there that the app somehow changes the basic cost input of the logistics business,” Mr. Smith told analysts about Uber. “That’s just incorrect.” Uber declines to comment.

Uber has tested deliveries of sushi in Barcelona, designer suits in Manhattan and condoms in Washington, D.C. Mr. Droege’s team now appears to be focusing on UberEats.

He joined the company last year from electrical stun-gun maker Taser International Inc. and was Uber CEO Travis Kalanick’s classmate at the University of California, Los Angeles. The two men joined forces on their first startup, a file-sharing service called Scour.

Uber’s network has one big potential cost advantage. Thousands of its drivers, including 22,000 in San Francisco, are constantly passing by homes and businesses, and those drivers pay for their own cars, gas, insurance and maintenance. Half of Uber’s rides in San Francisco occur through UberPool, a service that matches passengers with others heading the same way.

Mr. Gurley, whose firm is an early Uber investor, says the same technology could match packages and people along similar routes.

One of Uber’s main goals with UberEats is to give drivers a way to earn income and stay on the road from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., a slow period when drivers are prone to drop off the service, according to a person who has discussed the program with Mr. Kalanick. UberEats also keeps drivers downtown so they are nearby when people leave work.

Customers pay a delivery fee of $3, and participating drivers get $12 an hour plus $2 per order and temporary bonuses of as much as $20 a day to start making UberEats deliveries, drivers in Chicago say. Those rates may vary in other cities. Uber won’t comment.

Uber drivers in major U.S. cities have average hourly pay of about $19, excluding out-of-pocket costs, according to Uber.

“As a driver, it’s a win-win,” says Ramon De Leon, 47, a former pizza delivery driver turned social-media strategist who drives a red Volkswagen Tiguan for Uber in Chicago. “We dedicate three hours of our day, and with a guaranteed base [pay] plus commission, it’s well worth your time.”

But delivering food creates new challenges for drivers, who have to get out of their cars to pick up the food from a drop-off point, store hot items in heated bags plugged into their cars’ cigarette-lighter outlets and sometimes park illegally while they wait for customers to show up at the curb.

Mr. De Leon says some people have ordered UberEats unintentionally when they actually want an Uber. The company shuts off the delivery service at 2 p.m. and instructs drivers to throw away any remaining food.

He doesn’t expect Uber to disrupt the food-delivery business as much as it has with taxis because it would be hard for Uber to expand beyond the two menu items it offers a day. “What Uber’s doing is getting you a burger from a place you can’t walk to,” Mr. De Leon says.

Uber is also experimenting with bike couriers. Last year, the company started UberRush in New York, aimed at small businesses that see it as a more modern alternative to a traditional bike messenger service.

Shoppers who buy a new suit on Suitsupply’s website during certain promotional periods can select UberRush as a same-day delivery option for $15 extra, compared with free one-day shipment from UPS. At checkout, Uber’s software summons a bike courier to the retailer’s shop in SoHo to pick up the suit and deliver it.

Retailers and customers can watch on a smartphone screen as a package moves across a map. “By being an Uber customer, I already knew how this service worked,” says David Heath, co-founder of New York socks retailer Bombas, who has used UberRush to send socks across town.

Uber’s smartphone savvy doesn’t automatically win over larger businesses, partly because they often rely on complex enterprise software to track inventory and manage shipments.

For example, one national apparel retailer discussed letting Uber handle same-day deliveries from its Manhattan locations to nearby customers but decided to pass because Uber didn’t have a way to link to the retailer’s inventory-management software, a person familiar with the matter says.

If a customer ordered a shirt, Uber’s software had no way of determining if the shirt was available in a specific size and color.

Insurance problems
Gilt hoped that offering free same-day delivery last December through Uber would appeal to last-minute holiday shoppers. But Uber’s insurance policy covered only up to $1,000, forcing Gilt to use a local bike messenger for pricier items, including a $24,000 handbag sold in the promotion. “It was a worthwhile initiative overall that yielded incremental revenue,” says a Gilt spokeswoman.

There was a different snag when Uber announced short-term partnerships last year to deliver high-end jewelry for Alexis Bittar Inc. to customers in New York. When the retailer got “multiple orders at a time, we could not secure that number of Ubers at once,” says a spokeswoman.
Uber ended an experiment delivering toiletries and other household items in Washington, D.C., after six months. There was no minimum purchase price, which meant drivers could go across town to deliver a $1 pack of chewing gum.

“This rarely every happened,” Uber’s spokeswoman says. Uber learned “what our users valued” and “areas where we can make the experience even better.”

Many of Uber’s favorite transportation tactics, such as raising fares to lure drivers onto the road during peak demand, won’t work in the world of logistics, where shipments happen at a fixed price and in a specific amount of time.

“If you are running a supply-chain operation and it starts giving you ‘surge’ pricing of 30% more than you are used to paying, your transportation budget can get blown very quickly,” says David Vernon, a logistics analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein and former executive at shipment giant DHL.

Uber won’t comment on how many deliveries are needed for the business to be profitable. Sidecar’s chief executive, Sunil Paul, says that “sending a driver to go pick up a $4.99 package and have them go spend 30 minutes on a delivery is not a profitable activity.”

Mr. Paul is working to solve the problem through what he calls “bundling,” or moving packages in tandem with people who are traveling a similar route. Hundreds of Sidecar drivers are now shuttling flowers, hot meals and even bags of weed, through a partnership with a medical marijuana service.

Sidecar says half of its rides in San Francisco are now package deliveries. The company guarantees Mr. Pekarek $22 an hour to $35 an hour when he does deliveries, more than he typically makes driving people. But he hasn’t yet gotten a delivery request and a passenger at the same time.

A Sidecar spokeswoman says the reason is because most of Mr. Pekarek’s deliveries have been hot food orders, which require faster movement. “People and packages in the same car are ideally suited for deliveries with bigger delivery windows such as two to four hours,” she says.

In order for Sidecar and Uber to sharply increase delivery volume, both companies might need to direct drivers to pick up certain items at a specified time. That could cause a legal headache for Uber, which is fighting two lawsuits that argue drivers should be classified as full-time employees.

Uber has countered that drivers are independent contractors, citing their ability to choose which passengers they want to pick up.

“As Uber tries to exert more control over how and when the drivers are doing work, that brings them closer to an employee status,” said Jeffrey Hirsch, a law professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Jeff Holden, Uber’s chief product officer and one of Amazon’s earliest supply-chain executives, says Uber’s delivery business is “still very nascent.” Mr. Kalanick, Uber’s chief executive, “is not about celebrating things that are not there yet. He likes to talk about what’s really working in scale.”

When Uber celebrated its fifth anniversary this month, there were subtle signs that Mr. Kalanick has reined in his ambitions.

“In a world where technology can deliver the ride you need within five minutes, just imagine all the other goods and services that you could one day get delivered quickly and safely with just the single touch of a button,” he said. The comment was Mr. Kalanick’s only reference to deliveries, and it came in the last 90 seconds of a 30-minute speech.

(Jefferies) Global Pharma : Top Picks : AbbVie, Pfizer & AstraZeneca

AbbVie is our Top Pick globally followed by PFE and AZN (Top Pick in Europe). We also remain very positive on Roche (pipeline), and ZTS (M&A/ Bayer spinversion) as well as on LLY, for which we have updated our estimates in this note and increased our PT to $100. We remain cautious on ABT (lack of catalysts), GSK (-ve earnings momentum) and BMY (mid-term IO threats/ valuation).

>>> UBS on Tom Tom

UBS on tomtom

TomTom - Call with Head of Automotive and bid speculation
Key points from conference call with head of TomTom Automotive
We hosted a call with TomTom's VP of Automotive with the following key takeaways: 
1) the company is confident on market share gain vs Nokia HERE going forward and believes it has c25% share in mapping and sees the market as a duopoly. 
2) TomTom expects the take-rates of embedded navigation systems (currently 30%) to significantly increase (towards 100%) as we move to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and highly automated driving (HAD). 
3) ADAS/HAD components that we believe could bring incremental value to the maps longer term. 
4) The company expects to provide a key component to these systems in the form of mapping/navigation but that it will be down to OEMs/Tier 1 suppliers to build the overall systems. The call supported our view that TomTom is well placed to benefit from the move to ADAS but is full valued.

Where does TomTom differentiate from Nokia HERE?
One of the key focus areas of the call was on differentiation vs competition. While the market is a duopoly, TomTom is building what it sees as three differentiators: 1) Its new mapping platform with continuous instead of batch updates of the maps. 2) High quality maps which incorporate much more detail of the road environment for highly automated driving. 3) A modular product strategy that can enable customers to take selected pieces of the TomTom offer to work within their overall solution.

Press speculation that autos OEM consortium looking at TomTom
Press speculation on Saturday (Sueddeutsche Zeitung reported by Bloomberg) said that management from autos OEMs (Daimler, BMW, Audi) had met for due diligence talks with TomTom representatives. The same autos OEMs had previously been speculated as working towards a bid for Nokia's HERE maps business and we maintain our view that it would make sense for a consortium of OEMs to acquire a mapping asset.

Valuation: €10.30 DCF-based price target
We maintain our Neutral rating at a price target of €10.30. TomTom trades on c24x PE 2016E vs peers on 14.4x and 1.8x EV/Sales vs peers 1.5x. We believe TomTom is well positioned with current focus on Automotive/ licensing and Telematics but valuation looks full at this point

(BofA-ML) 66 trading days to go...Before FED Hike ?

* 66 trading days to go…
…until the Fed hikes rates on Sept 17th for the first time since 2006. Government bonds on course for 2nd worst annual performance in past 30 years, another symbol of 2015’s Twilight Zone as the era of excess liquidity comes to an end.

* 3 reasons why past Fed performance is no guide to future performance
Volatility in credit & equity markets should be owned: credit & equity bull markets have been ZIRP-led; U-turns have followed other central banks “exit from zero”; Fed rarely hikes from zero…last time they did in 1937 a recession and a 49% plunge in the Dow Jones quickly ensued.

* Using the classic Fed roadmap...
…on June 17th traders go long EM and US stocks, short gold, Euro & Yen. On Sept 17th traders go long commodities, and short US stocks, defensives sectors, EM bonds; as tightening progresses, investors allocate more to EAFE & EM equities, US tech & commodities, reduce exposure to Investment Grade bonds.

* It ain’t 1937…
…but we remain tactically cautious until Greece resolved, buy SPX calls, remain structurally bullish the US dollar, bullish stocks, bearish rates & opportunistic in EM, buy developed market banks, sell corporate bonds & reduce MBS exposure.

* My Big, Fat Greek Dreading (and other risks)
To the upside: concerns over Greece prove misplaced, investors over-hedge Fed risks, passage of TPP boost investor & corporate confidence, tech’s creative disruption = higher PE, lower CPI. To the downside: inflation surprises to upside.

WSJ : EU Antitrust Chief Vestager Warns Against Big Telecom Mergers

EU Antitrust Chief Vestager Warns Against Big Telecom Mergers
Telecom operators in the region have been on a deals blitz over the past 18 months

BRUSSELS—Europe’s antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager fired a warning shot at the region’s telecom industry, arguing that a wave of mergers between national telecom operators could harm consumers and probably won’t lead to greater investment.

Telecom operators in the region have been on a deals blitz over the past 18 months, with companies in the U.K., France, Spain and elsewhere looking to share the burden of rising costs as revenues slide.

Speaking at an event in Paris on Monday, Ms. Vestager said she didn’t buy the arguments of incumbent telecom operators that they needed to merge with rivals in the same country to increase their investment in networks.

“I’ve heard this claim quite often, but I have not seen evidence that this is the case,” Ms. Vestager said.

Instead, she said there was “ample evidence” that “excessive” consolidation may lead to higher bills for consumers, and that it “reduces the incentives in national markets to innovate.”


The comments are the clearest sign yet that Ms. Vestager may take a tougher approach toward telecom mergers than her predecessor, Joaquin Almunia, who waved through a series of deals that reduced the number of mobile operators in several EU countries from four to three, including in Germany and Ireland.

Telecom operators hit back swiftly at Ms. Vestager’s remarks. The EU’s telecom industry “should be built upon companies [that] operate at an efficient scale to deliver better broadband for consumers and that are better suited to compete globally,” said Steven Tas, Chairman of the European Telecommunications Network Operators’ Association, whose members include Germany’s Deutsche Telekom AG and Orange SA of France.

Operators argue that their deals are necessary in order to finance network upgrades and invest in new technology at a time when they’ve seen revenues sputter.

So far this year, telecom firms have announced deals worth nearly $67 billion, the highest level for that period since 2000, according to Dealogic. In the U.K., broadband operator BT Group PLC has agreed to pay $19 billion for EE, which would combine the country’s biggest fixed and wireless operators respectively, while Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. plans to merge its U.K. unit with Telefonica’s O2. In Italy, Hutchison is in talks with Amsterdam-based telecom company VimpelCom Ltd. about forming a joint venture between their mobile-phone subsidiaries in the country.

BT said on Monday that its U.K. deal wouldn’t reduce the number of fixed or mobile operators in the country, and would “benefit customers as well as support investment and innovation.”

“The combined company would invest heavily to ensure the U.K. is a leader when it comes to ultrafast broadband and [fifth generation wireless infrastructure],” a BT spokesman said.

In her speech, Ms. Vestager highlighted the beneficial effects of new competitors in the telecom market, including Free Mobile, which entered France in 2009.

“Following that entry, the overall level of telecoms investment in France grew, and remains at higher levels than at the moment of Free’s entry,” she said.

Still, Ms. Vestager’s stance appears to be at odds with recent remarks from other top officials at the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the commission’s new president and Günther Oettinger, digital commissioner, have both called for relaxing restrictions on mergers in the industry as a way to encourage investment, especially amid global competition.

In a recent interview, Europe’s top digital chief Andrus Ansip said: “It’s not up to the European Commission to say how many players there have to be in this European marketplace, it’s up to the market to say how many players they will accept.”

(BarCap) May China auto sales deteriorate

*Global Autos & Auto Parts: May China auto sales deteriorate
+1.2% growth in May (+6.4% Y/Y YTD): Passenger vehicle (PV) wholesales (including minibus) in China were 1.6mn in May 2015, +1% y/y, decelerating from 4% y/y in April and 9% in March. The MSRP cut from foreign OEMs in April and May (VW/GM) did not seem to lead to improving sales. The growth deceleration was driven by an 11% y/y decline in sedan sales offset by strength in SUV and MPV (+43% y/y, +9% y/y, respectively). Sales growth in premium segments (Audi, BMW and Mercedes) in May slowed to 2% y/y from 5% in April. Sales of domestic brands (Great Wall, Geely, BYD, Chery and Changan combined) rose 11% y/y in May, continuing to outpace the overall market due to their stronger position in low-priced SUVs, but also decelerated from +19% y/y in 4M15. Their market share increased 1.7ppts y/y to 19.0% from 17.3% in May 2014.

(CS) Kering update, cut to Underperform

KERING (UP, TP EUR140): Our below consenus EPS estimates mainly reflects our cautious stance on Gucci. We see downside risk to the shares ahead of 2Q results due on 27 July. We see risk to consensus expectations of flat organic sales at Gucci as we model a 4% decline in 2015e. We think the market is too optimistic on a 2H growth recovery given the short-term headwinds of simplifying the breadth of the product lines, launching lowerprice products, rationalising wholesale and its store base. We believe Gucci will find it difficult to avoid cost deleverage as it has very few levers to pull to control costs. Rental cost inflation is still running high in the industry and Gucci cannot cut its marketing budget in the midst of a repositioning strategy. Puma should also face some margin pressure from its dollar sourcing from 4Q15, which does not seem to be discounted into market expectations.

(CS) BAT & IMT

BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO (OP, TP GBp3800): We reinstate our rating on BAT that has arguably the most consistent track record in consumer staples (constant FX EPS growth). Where the model may differ in the coming years is the use of cash flow. With net debt/EBITDA over 2.5x following recent M&A the short-term emphasis will be on debt reduction instead of buybacks. Imperial Tobacco may well receive plaudits for its new-found US exposure, but BAT also now also earns c20% of its net profit in the US (2016 estimate) - and arguably through a better business in its 42% stake in Reynolds. Associates now play a key role in BAT's valuation with Reynolds being 22% of the group's market cap, with the 30% stake in ITC representing a further 12%. Both these businesses trade at a higher 2016E P/E multiple than BAT (21x and 17x respectively) - strip these out and BAT's multiple would drop from 14.8x to 13.5x, in line with Imperial Tobacco.

IMPERIAL TOBACCO (OP, TP GBp3600): We reinstate coverage with an Outperform rating and a price target of £36. We raise our 2015/16 EPS by 15%. The $7.1bn acquisition of some US brands from Reynolds has the potential to be a game changer for Imperial since it transforms the US business. We believe the deal ticks both the strategic and financial logic boxes, with a starting return on investment target of 10%+. Elsewhere the group's core European market (65% of profits pre the U.S. deal) looks to be stabilising after 3-4 pretty torrid years.The 13.6x 2015/16E earnings is a significant 35% discount to staples versus long term average 30%.

>>> What to look at today - 16th of June 2015

Dow -0.60% S&P -0.46% Nasdaq -0.42% Russell -0.31% VIX 15.39 (+11.68%)
US Market closed lower, below 100d MA, Greece is still main catalyst for pushing sentiment down. Equities held near their afternoon levels after Germany's Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that Eurozone officials have agreed on a plan B in the event Greece is unable to come to terms with its creditors. According to the report, a special summit will be held on Friday night if this week passes without a deal. Furthermore, it is expected that capital controls will be imposed, but enforcement of those measures would be in the hands of the Greek parliament. countercyclical side looked a little better with the health care sector (+0.03%) eking out a slim gain. The utilities sector (-0.2%) finished ahead of the broader market while telecom services (-0.6%) and consumer staples (-0.7%) underperformed. Volume were inline with average @ 715mil shares. US After Hours GPS +1.0%, LAKE +0.5%, CPST -14.4%, PFIE -12.3% following earnings/guidance Asia equity markets are generally lower with the exception of Australia, as headwinds from Greek uncertainty and selloff on Wall St going into Wednesday's FOMC weighed on sentiment. China markets were hit particularly hard, falling as much as 2.5% in the morning session before paring some of those losses by midday break. Ongoing clampdown on margin trading activity along with another active week of IPO issuance are widely attributed to renewed pressure on the mainland and the swoon in Shanghai Composite to 1-week lows. In Europe, Germany's Bild cited comments from Greek Fin Min Varoufakis who said Athens does not intend to present a new list of reform proposals at the upcoming Eurogroup meeting on Thursday. This is in line with the hardline stance taken by Syriza politicians expressed over the weekend, and the subsequent downside in EUR/USD on those comments was marginal. For the session, EUR/USD traded in a 20pip range above $1.1260.

Nikkei -0.53% Hang Seng -0.59% Shanghai -2.09%

Eur$ 1.1278 JPY 123.57 GBP 1.5610 EURCHF 1.0484 RUB $54.5175 WTI $60.17 (+1.09%)

S&P -0.14% EuroStoxx-0.23% Dax-0.16% SMI-0.35%


Macro :
- Greece Won’t Present New Proposal to Eurogroup to Unlock Aid

Keep an eye on :
- AIR FP : Airbus Contract With OneWeb Worth About $1.4B, Les Echos Says
- AIR FP : JetBlue Eyes Long-Range Airbus for Growth Overseas: Reuters
- AF FP : Air France Files Claim Against Pilots Over Costs Plan: Figaro
- COTY US : Coty Said to Win Auction to Buy 3 P&G Units: NY Post --> +7.5% in after Hours
- DELB BB : Delhaize Prepares for Potential Greek Euro Exit, De Tijd Reports
- DB1 GY : Deutsche Boerse considering bid for 360T - Boersen-Zeitung http://bit.ly/1IGz4Lo
- DTE GY : German Mobile Spectrum Auction Reaches EU3.98b After 144th Round
- FDR FP : Credit Agricole, SocGen, CDC Buy FDM Stake From FDR
- GSK LN : GSK rumoured to be in line for GBP 92bn approach from Johnson & Johnson or Roche - Daily Mail
- HSBA LN : HSBC, JPM in Talks on Moving Some Business to Luxembourg: Times
- LG FP : Lafarge to Buy Out Stake in Lafarge India Pending Holcim Merger
- LHA GY : Lufthansa to Miss Score Targets, Handelsblatt Reports
- EGL PL : Mota-Engil to Sell as Much as EU95m of Bonds Due Feb. 2020
- NUM FP : French Antitrust Approves Hiridjee to Buy Outremer Amid SFR Deal
- SSE LN : SSE Urges U.K. Govt to Move to ‘National Pricing’ in Energy Mkt
- UCG IM : UniCredit’s Vita Says No Interest in Postbank: Handelsblatt