(JPM) US Equtiy Markets - 2016 Outlook - Position for Rotation - pdf attached

Limited upside to US equities. Equity upside will be closely linked to earnings growth delivery. We expect S&P 500 to reach 2,200 by year-end 2016, with an EPS target of $123. This implies 4-5% upside in price and 3-4% upside in earnings. Negative earnings effect from energy is likely to fade away, but strong USD will continue to exert some drag
causing further negative revisions to current 2016 earnings growth estimates of 8.5%. Equity multiple will be limited from re-rating much higher, in our view. The market is of age and already trading at close to 18x (NTM) P/E.

Expect a volatile path—VIX to rise from current level of ~15 to an average of 16-18 in 2016. Higher volatility forecast is based on the rates cycle and uncertainty around central bank policy and extremely low levels of market liquidity. While equity volumes look robust, market depth has declined by more than 60% over the last 2 years, limiting market capacity to absorb large shocks. We forecast higher level of tail risk—a measure of volatility of volatility—with both quiet periods and periods of volatile sell-offs such as August this year as likely. High levels of geopolitical risk will also add to market volatility.

Macro crowding—change in market leadership is warranted. Central bank policy divergence and related macro trends have fueled one of the strongest momentum trades across equities since early 1980s. These macro trends—strengthening USD, weakening commodities and EM assets, falling bond yields—are closely intertwined across markets and asset classes. They’ve had a strong impact on equities. Even though S&P 500 has been range-bound for most of 2015, at the stock level winners have continued to win and losers continued to lose driven by macro forces. In many areas of the market this momentum trade has persisted for several consecutive years. Consumer Disc, for instance, has outpaced Energy in each of the last 7 years, cumulatively outperforming by more than 260%.

This equity trend can also be viewed across style performance. Momentum—closely resembling Low Volatility, but also Growth and Quality styles—outperformed Value by 31% from mid-2013. Momentum is extremely expensive and crowded—valuation spread between Momentum and Value is at historical extremes and dispersion among high momentum stocks is low and falling. Also, the much anticipated Dec. rate hike is a risk to Momentum and a boost to Value, which is seasonally strong around the turn of the year. See Figure 211 for detailed screens of Momentum related “Stocks to Avoid”.

How much further can the current macro divergence persist for and have market expectations already run too far ahead? Several of these equity trends are relying on anticipated central bank actions that would boost the USD and further weaken commodities and EM assets. The risk of this increasingly one dimensional positioning, not just by equity
investors, but also by macro funds, CTAs and risk parity portfolios, is that these trends don’t materialize and trades simply become too crowded and bound to sharp reversals. An example of such crowded and complacent macro positioning was 12/3 post-ECB reaction, where EUR/USD shot up by ~4% intraday (4.9 std. deviation event) and had the 2nd biggest daily move since its inception. While it’s hard to pin-point the exact timing of this rotation, we suggest investors start rotating from expensive, crowded and macro-driven equity Momentum plays towards Value, both across and within sectors. See page 99 for screens of “Stocks to Favor” with more reasonable valuation as part of this rotation.

In line with the above views, at the sector level we continue to favor Financials and Technology, and are upgrading Energy to OW from Neutral. We are downgrading Healthcare from OW to Neutral, and maintain a Neutral stance on Materials, Cons. Staples and Cons Disc (recently downgraded). We stay UW Utilities, Telecom and Industrials.

WSJ : House GOP Bill Includes REIT-Spinoff Ban

House GOP Bill Includes REIT-Spinoff Ban

Proposal part of larger plan to revive and extend dozens of expired tax breaks through 2016

WASHINGTON––House Republicans have proposed banning a popular technique that lets companies spin off their property holdings into tax-advantaged real-estate investment trusts.

A bill released late Monday night by the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee would ban the technique, effective immediately. The proposal is part of a larger plan that would revive and extend dozens of expired tax breaks through 2016, and its fate will be decided in the frenzied final few days before Congress adjourns. Its inclusion in what lawmakers have described as the fallback plan signals at least some consensus on the REIT issue.

REIT spinoffs, often urged by activist investors, have become popular in recent years among retailers, restaurant chains and casino companies. Darden Restaurants Inc., the owner of Olive Garden restaurants, completed one last month. Macy’s Inc. and McDonald’s Corp. have resisted investors’ calls to follow along.

The Internal Revenue Service has raised warnings about some spinoffs and said in September that it was considering new rules. The bill from Rep. Kevin Brady (R., Texas), the Ways and Means chairman, would prevent the technique and prevent spun-off companies from converting into REITs for 10 years. It also contains several other changes to the REIT rules.

Robert Willens, a New York-based tax adviser, said in an email Tuesday that he understood the concerns about whether REIT spinoffs truly separate the real estate from the rest of the business, because they are so interrelated.

“I think it’s dangerous, and totally unwarranted, to deny tax-free status to a spinoff based purely on the ‘identity’ of the parties to the spinoff,” Mr. Willens said of the proposal in Mr. Brady’s bill. “I’m not a fan of this proposal and would hope that ‘cooler heads’ prevail here and the proposal never gets enacted.”

>>> Vivendi does not exclude taking control of Gameloft

Vivendi does not exclude taking control of Gameloft

Vivendi announced today (8 December) that it now holds 26.69% of the share capital of Gameloft, a French company with internationally recognised know-how in mobile gaming. This participation represents a total of 22.7m Gameloft shares acquired on the market for a total amount of EUR 111.6m.

A statement from the company said, "No decision has been taken at this stage regarding a potential public tender offer on the Gameloft shares. In the course of the coming months, Vivendi intends to favour a constructive approach enabling both parties to consider fruitful cooperation. If such an approach does not lead to a favourable conclusion, Vivendi would not exclude taking control of Gameloft.”

(JPM) US Equtiy Markets - 2016 Outlook - Position for Rotation

Limited upside to US equities. Equity upside will be closely linked to earnings growth delivery. We expect S&P 500 to reach 2,200 by year-end 2016, with an EPS target of $123. This implies 4-5% upside in price and 3-4% upside in earnings. Negative earnings effect from energy is likely to fade away, but strong USD will continue to exert some drag
causing further negative revisions to current 2016 earnings growth estimates of 8.5%. Equity multiple will be limited from re-rating much higher, in our view. The market is of age and already trading at close to 18x (NTM) P/E.

Expect a volatile path—VIX to rise from current level of ~15 to an average of 16-18 in 2016. Higher volatility forecast is based on the rates cycle and uncertainty around central bank policy and extremely low levels of market liquidity. While equity volumes look robust, market depth has declined by more than 60% over the last 2 years, limiting market capacity to absorb large shocks. We forecast higher level of tail risk—a measure of volatility of volatility—with both quiet periods and periods of volatile sell-offs such as August this year as likely. High levels of geopolitical risk will also add to market volatility.

Macro crowding—change in market leadership is warranted. Central bank policy divergence and related macro trends have fueled one of the strongest momentum trades across equities since early 1980s. These macro trends—strengthening USD, weakening commodities and EM assets, falling bond yields—are closely intertwined across markets and asset classes. They’ve had a strong impact on equities. Even though S&P 500 has been range-bound for most of 2015, at the stock level winners have continued to win and losers continued to lose driven by macro forces. In many areas of the market this momentum trade has persisted for several consecutive years. Consumer Disc, for instance, has outpaced Energy in each of the last 7 years, cumulatively outperforming by more than 260%.

This equity trend can also be viewed across style performance. Momentum—closely resembling Low Volatility, but also Growth and Quality styles—outperformed Value by 31% from mid-2013. Momentum is extremely expensive and crowded—valuation spread between Momentum and Value is at historical extremes and dispersion among high momentum stocks is low and falling. Also, the much anticipated Dec. rate hike is a risk to Momentum and a boost to Value, which is seasonally strong around the turn of the year. See Figure 211 for detailed screens of Momentum related “Stocks to Avoid”.

How much further can the current macro divergence persist for and have market expectations already run too far ahead? Several of these equity trends are relying on anticipated central bank actions that would boost the USD and further weaken commodities and EM assets. The risk of this increasingly one dimensional positioning, not just by equity
investors, but also by macro funds, CTAs and risk parity portfolios, is that these trends don’t materialize and trades simply become too crowded and bound to sharp reversals. An example of such crowded and complacent macro positioning was 12/3 post-ECB reaction, where EUR/USD shot up by ~4% intraday (4.9 std. deviation event) and had the 2nd biggest daily move since its inception. While it’s hard to pin-point the exact timing of this rotation, we suggest investors start rotating from expensive, crowded and macro-driven equity Momentum plays towards Value, both across and within sectors. See page 99 for screens of “Stocks to Favor” with more reasonable valuation as part of this rotation.

In line with the above views, at the sector level we continue to favor Financials and Technology, and are upgrading Energy to OW from Neutral. We are downgrading Healthcare from OW to Neutral, and maintain a Neutral stance on Materials, Cons. Staples and Cons Disc (recently downgraded). We stay UW Utilities, Telecom and Industrials.

(BofA-ML) Luxury Goods : 2016 year ahead: Luxury sector embedded

2016 year ahead: Luxury sector embedded with earnings & valuation risk

* Sub-market earnings growth to drive sector de-rating
We lower our sector earnings & PO’s again, see table 1. We are now 15% below
consensus 2017. We believe the slowdown in sector earnings growth is structural and
returns have peaked. Our forecasts imply 4% earnings CAGR in the next 3-years, below
the European market, as a result we argue for a sector de-rating from its current 30%
P/E rel. In our view the catalyst for a de-rating will be [1] increased visibility over submarket
earnings growth; and [2] a muted recovery in Chinese luxury consumption.

* Six key themes to drive luxury sector (under)performance
[1] Revenue slowdown structural, not cyclical. BofAMLe 4% rev growth for 2016
White space retail penetration into Asia drove 2/3rds of sector revenue in last 5 years.
Rev now reliant on same-store-sales for growth, difficult given limited pricing power.
[2] Retail store consolidation likely.
We see the potential for store closures in Greater China, given over capacity in Tier 2-3
cities. LVMH has started, expect others to follow suit. Limited cost savings
[3] Margin pressure to persist: retail deleverage & negative geography mix.
Ongoing rent inflation in premium real estate (6-9% pa) would result in retail
deleverage. Historic EBIT margins are now largely irrelevant as they included significant
over-earning in HK, unlikely to return.
[4] RMB devaluation poses significant risk.
Our Global Rates team has high conviction the RMB will decline by as much as 10% vs the
USD in 2016. This would reduce sector EBIT by 7%, and more significantly impact
Chinese sentiment & offshore luxury consumption. UHR, CFR & Burberry most at risk.
[5] Tourism support to fade, particularly in Europe.
Lead indicators suggest tourism would slow into Q4 & 2016. In our view, Europe is the
region with most to lose, LVMH the company.
[6] Digital & Japan the only standout’s.
Consumers increasingly shifting luxury spend online, YNAP only pure-play exposure. Japan
will likely continue to benefit from inbound tourism at the expense of HK (and margins).

* Bearish sector view reflected in U/P on LVMH, CFR & UHR
Our U/P rating on LVMH reflects its expensive P/E rel given sub-market earnings
growth, tough comps from weak EUR & tourism and bullish positioning. Swatch: weak
end demand, inventory build & smart watch threat. Richemont: exposed to weakest
categories in luxury (HK & watches) and margin pressure, vs cons expecting expansion.

* Buy YNAP & Pandora for growth, Kering self-help
Our Buy rating on YNAP reflects its pure play on digital luxury, which continues to take
share. Our high conviction emphasised by its BofAML Europe1 inclusion. Pandora:
above sector EPS growth & returns. Kering: while not immune to macro headwinds KER
has a self-help story, with a turnaround at Gucci & potential divestment of Puma. We
upgrade adidas to Neutral given ongoing strength in the category, supported by
“athleasuire”.

(HSBC) China Aircraft & Parts --> interesting for Airbus - have a look

(HSBC) China Aircraft & Parts : Initiating coverage: Gaining take-off velocity

* Significant technological gains and increasing defence expenditure underpin the sector’s structural long-term growth
* Potential reforms should also improve the longer-term outlook and relative sector attractiveness
* Initiate on eight companies: Buy AviChina, JONHON, AVIC Electromechanical and AVICopter

* Significant progress but still substantial potential. China is one of the few
countries to have established a complex aerospace industry. It has reduced its
dependency on foreign designs/suppliers and is now capable of indigenously
developing more advanced 4th generation fighters (J-20 & J-31) as well as mid-sized
commercial passenger planes (C919). The technology gap with international
suppliers across both military and commercial products is rapidly closing, implying
scope for upside as improving competitiveness drives domestic and international
demand.

* Military upgrading to underpin sector growth: The PLA Air Force (PLAAF) is
undergoing rapid modernisation as it replaces aircraft types dating from the
pre-1980s (e.g. J-7 & J-8) with 3rd generation capability (e.g. J-10, J-11 & J-16) and
develops new transporters, bombers and special mission aircraft. We forecast
military aircraft procurement spend to grow at an 18% CAGR over the next five years.
In addition, we see growth upside from various commercial plane developments
especially as the indigenous programmes (e.g. C919) leverage on the strong and
growing domestic demand from the world’s second-largest aircraft market.

* SOE reforms slower than expected but still offer upside: The defence industry
should benefit from the broader SOE reforms. In particular, potential changes to the
standard “cost-plus” pricing model should boost margins, while asset injections into the
listcos and better management incentive schemes should improve industry efficiency
and profitability.

* Sector top picks are AviChina, JONHON, AVIC Electro and AVICopter: All
aircraft manufacturing in China is grouped within AVIC Group. We initiate on eight of
AVIC’s subsidiaries which have majority revenue exposure to defence spending, with
Buy ratings on AviChina (2357 HK, TP HKD8.3), China Aviation Optical-Electrical
Technology (‘JONHON’, 002179 CH, TP RMB52.6), AVIC Electromechanical
(002013 CH, TP RMB30.6) and AVIC Helicopter (‘AVICopter’, 600038 CH, TP
RMB65.9) given growth potential and relative valuations. We view valuations as fair
for AVIC Aircraft (000768 CH, TP RMB27.30), China Avionics Systems (‘AVIC
Avionics’, 600372 CH, TP RMB29.6) and AVIC Aviation Engine (‘AVIC Engine’,
600893 CH, TP RMB51.0) and initiate with Hold ratings. We initiate on Hongdu
Aviation (600316 CH) with Reduce (TP RMB8.9).