WSJ : European Equities: The Burden of Hope

European Equities: The Burden of Hope

There are good reasons to invest in European equities—the problem is that everyone agrees about them

European stocks have offered investors euphoria and despair in 2015, and are ending the year with modest gains. Many are still betting that Europe can perform in 2016. That in itself is a problem.

This year has offered a wild ride. The Stoxx Europe 600 rose a dizzying 20.9% by mid-April, only to crash back to earth in August as investors panicked over China and deflation; stocks then regained their poise but have been pummeled by disappointment over European Central Bank policy and a renewed rout in commodities. The index is now up 7.3% for the year, far off its peaks; the weakness of the euro means it is down in dollar terms.

But hope springs eternal. Relative to other parts of the globe, the European economic picture still looks supportive. Growth has held up in the face of global headwinds; leading indicators point to continued expansion. Unemployment is falling, low oil prices should boost consumers and fiscal policy has ceased to be a drag. The ECB, despite December’s failure to match market expectations, is still loosening monetary policy, and interest rates are remarkably low while lending is picking up. The backdrop is supportive.

Meanwhile, the performance in 2015 suggests that caution has prevailed in European equities: the winners have been defensive sectors like food and beverage. Yield is still a big focus for investors given the negligible returns available on government and high-grade corporate bonds. Equity investors have been behaving more like bond investors in terms of risk appetite. Relief in commodities, an easing of emerging-market fears, or stronger eurozone growth could all give European markets a boost.

As a result, European equities, along with Japanese stocks, are a common choice as a better bet than their peers in 2016. But that consensus view poses a challenge: if everyone already likes European stocks, it is difficult to see how they can perform. Popular trades are vulnerable to disappointment.

The external risks are clearly large and hard to predict: commodities and China look like wild cards. There are disturbing rumblings in the U.S. credit market, where high-yield bonds are in trouble. But homegrown problems remain too. European earnings have once again failed to pick up in aggregate, although the meltdown in commodities is largely to blame. But with the Stoxx Europe 600 already trading on about 15 times the next 12 months’ earnings, according to FactSet, earnings need to rise. Expectations for next year are moderate, with growth of 7-8% forecast.

The eurozone successfully coped with the renewed threat of a Greek exit in 2015 but political risk isn’t abating: the refugee crisis could ultimately be a much harder problem for Europe to deal with, although so far it has had little market impact.

The base case for European equities is still strong enough for investors to keep the faith. But it isn’t as compelling as it was a year ago. Being popular isn’t enough to guarantee success.

>>> FBR Capital highlights the top 10 potential M&A ideas in Software for the co

FBR Capital highlights the top 10 potential M&A ideas in Software for the coming year 

FBR Capital sees the following names as possible M&A plays in 2016 (in no particular order): (1) Cisco and NetApp, (2) Cisco and FireEye, (3) IBM and Splunk, (4) IBM and Qlik, (5) HP and Box, (6) HP and Qlik, (7) Oracle and Netsuite, (8) Microsoft and Imperva, (9) Microsoft and Qualys, and (10) Symantec and Proofpoint.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down

M&A news: PBY -2.6% (Bridgestone will not counter latest Carl Icahn bid of $18.50/share).

Select metals/mining stocks trading lower: AU -2.9%, BHP -1.2%, BBL -0.7%, RIO -0.2%.

Select oil/gas related names showing early weakness: LINE -6.5%, WLL -4.7%, CHK -4.6%, DO -2.5%, SLB -1.8%, NE -1.7%, COP -1.6%, HES -1.5%, CVX -1.4%, KMI -1.3%, STO -1.2%, XOM -1.2%, BP -1%, RIG -0.8%.

A few Brazil ADRs are lower on light volume: SID -3.5%, BAK -3.1%, VIV -2.6%, PBR -3.2%, GGB -2.5%, BRFS -2.2%

Other news: ENZN -23.1% (trading ex-dividend), AVXL -6.1% (cautious blog mention), INVT -5.1% (following yesterday's ~75% move higher), FXCM -3% (following this week's surge higher), FCX -2.4% (still checking), CENX -2.1% (will delist from the Iceland Stock Exchange; will remain listed on NASDAQ), CLIR -2% (filed $30 mln mixed securities shelf offering), HSBC -1.4% (weakness in overseas trading),BCS -1.1% (still checking), CMCM -0.5% (enters into a new strategic cooperation agreement with Tencent), TERP -0.3% (SunEdison acquires a 33% ownership interest in a 336 megawatt DC portfolio of operating solar power plants from Dominion (D), transfers interest to Terra Nova Renewable Partners), BAC -0.2% (redeems $2 bln of trust preferred securities), FB -0.2% (Reuters details a court ruling that Facebook (FB) must face two shareholder lawsuits stemming from its 2012 IPO).

Analyst comments: STEM -4.4% (ticking lower, target lowered to $1.50 from $2.10 at H.C. Wainwright following news of strategic realignment), VNR -0.6% (downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley), DDD -0.5% (target lowered to $14 at Needham -- Consumer exit is one step in what should be a long road to recovery).

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
M&A news: IRM +3.3% (Iron Mountain reports that it will undertake efforts to address UK CMA concerns over the proposed acquisition of Recall Holdings Limited; Transaction closure is expected in 2Q16), FCS +3% (Fairchild Semi confirms receipt of a revised, unsolicited $21.70/share proposal).

Other news: OHGI +37.3% (upgrades its China mobile VoIP telco Aishuo, due to growth in excess of 12 mln downloads in the past 9 months), ATNM +5.8% (continued strength), SUNE +5% (SunEdison acquires a 33% ownership interest in a 336 megawatt DC portfolio of operating solar power plants from Dominion, transfers interest to Terra Nova Renewable Partners), BLDP +4.4% (continued strength),LPL +3.8% (report indicates LG Display as an iPhone OLED screens supplier), MT +3.3% (modest rebound), GDP +3.2% (continued strength), PLUG +2.7% (light volume, likely BLDP sympathy), HMY +1.8% and GOLD +0.6% (bucking the trend - looking around), SRPT +1.1% (still checking), CCL +0.7% (continued strength), (still checking), RDY +0.5% (announced the re-launch of its Esomeprazole Magnesium Delayed-Release Capsules), LUV +0.4% (light volume, reaches tentative agreement with Transport Workers Union Local 555).

Analyst comments: SKUL +2.5% (initiated with an Outperform at Oppenheimer; $8 tgt)

(La Tribune) Orange veut-il vraiment s’inviter chez TF1 ?

D’après le Canard Enchaîné, l’Etat pousserait l’opérateur historique à prendre une participation de 10% dans TF1 dans le cadre d’un possible mariage entre Orange et Bouygues Telecom. Selon des sources proches du dossier, il s’agirait d’une hypothèse « fantaisiste ».

La possibilité d'un mariage entre Bouygues Telecom et Orange ne cesse d'alimenter les rumeurs. D'après le Canard Enchaîné du jour, ce serait ni plus ni moins que François Hollande qui « tire les ficelles » de cette vaste opération. Pour l'hebdomadaire, l'opérateur historique, dont l'Etat détient 23%, « étudie la possibilité de prendre une participation de 10% dans la chaîne de Martin Bouygues », dans le scénario d'un rapprochement entre Orange et Bouygues Telecom.

A en croire « un des acteurs du feuilleton télécoms » cité par le journal satirique, « les politiques se contrefichent de l'accord sur les télécoms. Tout ce qui les intéresse, c'est TF1. [...] Dès qu'on parle du 20 heures, ils ont les yeux qui brillent ». En d'autres termes, François Hollande favoriserait ce montage pour avoir, via Orange, une influence sur TF1, « le Graal pour tout candidat à la présidentielle », lâche le Canard Enchaîné.

« Aucun commentaire »

Contactés par La Tribune, Orange et Bouygues ne font « aucun commentaire » sur ces informations. Bercy n'a pas, ce mercredi matin, répondu à nos sollicitations. Toutefois, une source proche du dossier affirme que l'hypothèse est « complètement fantaisiste ».


« On a affaire à une sorte de théorie du complot très étonnante, nous dit-on. En plus, si l'Etat veut monter au capital de TF1, il n'a pas besoin d'une telle opération : il peut monter au capital directement sachant que Bouygues en possède 43%. En outre, peut-on vraiment croire qu'on peut prendre le contrôle d'une chaîne avec seulement 10% des parts ? »



TF1 n'est « pas un point de discussion »

D'après une autre source proche du dossier, « si la partie TF1 a été abordée au début [des négociations, Ndlr], ce n'est pas un point de discussion aujourd'hui ». Sur ce point, début décembre, l'agence Bloomberg - qui a révélé que des discussions préliminaires avaient débuté entre Orange et Bouygues pour la cession de la filiale télécoms de ce dernier -, avait évoqué l'intérêt de l'opérateur historique pour TF1. Devant le CSA, Nonce Paolini, le PDG de la chaîne, avait dans la foulée déclaré devant le CSA que son bébé n'était pas concerné par un possible deal Orange-Bouygues Télécom.
Concernant l'implication de l'Etat dans les négociations, beaucoup d'observateurs jugent qu'il souhaite d'abord disposer de garanties industrielles ainsi qu'en matière d'investissements et d'emploi. Sous ce prisme, un mariage de Bouygues Télécom avec Orange aurait davantage la cote auprès des autorités qu'un rapprochement avec le Numericable-SFR de Patrick Drahi, dont la réputation de « cost killer » n'est plus à faire. Le fait qu'Emmanuel Macron, le ministre de l'Economie, a déclaré il y a deux semaines ne pas avoir « de position de principe » contre un retour à trois opérateurs dans l'Hexagone a ainsi pu être perçu comme un feu vert de Bercy.