Barron's : It’s Time to Pump Up Your Oil Exposure

It’s Time to Pump Up Your Oil Exposure

Some worry that oil prices could fall again. But it’s far more likely that crude supplies will tighten, driving prices higher.

It’s time to get bullish on oil. The low in prices is probably already over.

The price of crude oil tumbled to a low of $26 a barrel in February from more than $100 in mid-2014. The spot price of West Texas Intermediate crude settled at $37.26 on Thursday.

Some worry that oil prices could fall again, if heavy production continues in the U.S., Canada, and Kurdish-controlled Iraq and a weak world economy reduces demand. But when all of the risks are weighed, it’s hard not to draw the opposite conclusion: It’s far more likely that crude supplies will tighten, driving prices higher. Investors could play the trend by buying crude-oil futures or shares of the United States Oil exchange-traded fund (ticker: USO), which tracks crude prices.

Saudi Arabia and Russia, both seeking to maintain market share in advance of a price rebound, helped drive prices down by pumping and dumping oil. Yet that era seems to have ended. Saudi Arabia shows no sign of plans to meaningfully increase the country’s supply, according to a recent report from Morgan Stanley. It will retain “spare capacity to ‘surge’ if necessary,” if there are outages elsewhere, as it has done previously, the report says.

Given Russia’s economic malaise, it’s unlikely authorities will push for more output without Saudi Arabia moving first, as doing so would sink oil prices further and hurt the cash-strapped Kremlin.

ELSEWHERE IN THE ARAB WORLD, supply looks like it may be abnormally high and set to fall. In Kurdish-controlled Iraq, a surge in production last year added almost 700,000 barrels per day to supply, making the country the second-biggest global contributor to liquid-energy-supply growth last year, according to the Energy Information Administration.

This increased output was probably induced by a free-for-all approach to the region’s energy deposits amid a lack of clear property rights, says Steve Hanke, professor of economics at Johns Hopkins University. It makes sense for the Kurds to pump a lot of oil and convert it into cash, at least while they hold the territory, he says. When formal boundaries are established, expect production to fall.

Lower prices have already hurt production in non-OPEC countries, such as the U.S. and Canada. Overall, the global supply of oil will turn negative this quarter, partially due to the worsening financial situation on producers outside OPEC, according to a recent report from Barclays.

There is a small risk of increased supply from Iran, which recently saw international sanctions lifted and has stated its desire to increase oil production. But Iran’s oil flow might not be as big as some expect. “Probably some of the Iranian supply was leaking out into the world market already,” says David Roberts, professor of defense studies at Kings College London. On top of that, Iran remains belligerent, so sanctions may be reimposed before the oil flows meaningfully.

Finally, as the world economy continues to develop, it will use more oil.

“The demand for oil keeps going up,” says Hanke. He sees the price headed back to $80 within 30 months as the demand-supply balance rights itself. We are already seeing evidence of that with a huge drawdown in oil inventories—amounting to 4.9 million barrels—last week.

Barron's : How the Yen’s Rise Could Affect the Stock Market

How the Yen’s Rise Could Affect the Stock Market
The puzzling strength of Japan’s currency threatens the country’s exporters and sends U.S. Treasuries climbing.

Shocked! Shocked! Like Captain Renault discovering gambling going on at Rick’s in Casablanca, the revelation that some of the richest folks from around the globe found ways to avoid and evade the tax man with the help of a secretive law firm in Panama should be anything but a surprise.

The only shockers were some of the names in the millions of pages of data leaked from the firm of Mossack Fonseca, in what has been dubbed the Panama Papers. Among them were the now-former prime minister of Iceland, Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson; the father of British Prime Minister David Cameron; Argentina President Mauricio Macri; and three of the seven members of China’s politburo standing committee, including relatives of President Xi Jinping, among others. Associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin also were mentioned, but he vehemently denied any involvement, calling the story another U.S. attempt to undermine him and Russia.

Elsewhere, big money was also under attack in Washington, as new tax rules aimed at curbing so-called inversions effectively scuttled Pfizer ’s (ticker: PFE) proposed $150 billion merger with Dublin-domiciled Allergan (AGN). Meanwhile, the Justice Department sued to block the $35 billion combination of oil-services giants Halliburton (HAL) and Baker Hughes (BHI). Indeed, since 2009, U.S. companies have dropped merger deals worth $370 billion, according to a Financial Times estimate reported last week.

CEOs also got involved in this highly politicized atmosphere. On the campaign trail, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders charged in a New York Daily News interview that General Electric (GE) is “destroying the moral fabric” of America, to which Jeffrey Immelt, GE’s chief executive, took umbrage. “We create wealth and jobs, instead of just calling for them in speeches,” he retorted in a Washington Post op-ed piece.

Hard to believe we’re only about halfway through the primaries, with months to go before the conventions, let alone November’s balloting. Still, it’s difficult to discern what impact the political season is having on the financial markets.

The presidential campaign is topic No. 1, not only in the U.S. but around the globe. Loomis Sayles’ veteran vice chairman, Dan Fuss, noted last week that on a recent trip to Japan, almost every meeting began with a conversation about the White House race, with a certain unnamed candidate (as if one couldn’t guess) dominating the observations.

Despite all the talk, the effect on the markets from the campaign has been hard to gauge, if indeed there has been any. Perhaps there are too many other factors to deal with that are producing persistent, discomfiting day-to-day lurches up and down.

That was apparent last week, especially on Thursday, when stock markets tumbled by 1%-plus, with bank shares—especially European ones—hit hard. At the same time, investors took refuge in their regular redoubts: U.S. Treasury bonds and the Japanese yen.

The rush into U.S. Treasuries was understandable. The highest-quality, most-liquid securities on the planet are also among the highest yielding. That anomaly reflects the descent of yields on many other governments’ securities into the investment Hades otherwise known as negative interest rates. The 1.72% offered by a 10-year U.S. Treasury looks absolutely lush, compared with the 0.1% provided by the comparable German Bund and especially the minus 0.08% on the 10-year Japanese government bond.

That should mean that money is coming to America, as in the Eddie Murphy movie of some years ago. But the dollar has been headed lower, while the yen in particular has been shooting into orbit. The yen’s ascent has been the subject of curiosity and confusion in the markets for a couple of months. After weakening initially to 121 to the dollar after the Bank of Japan pushed some interest rates below zero in late January, the currency has steadily appreciated. Initially, it firmed to the 112 to 114 range (meaning it took fewer yen to buy a dollar) in February and most of March.

But over the past week or so, the yen has surged to 108 to the dollar, hugely disconcerting the Japanese stock markets. According to the most recent Tankan survey of business, Japanese corporations are budgeting an exchange rate of 117.5; a significantly stronger yen would make their wares much less competitive. A warning from Japan’s finance minister, implying intervention, halted the currency’s advance on Friday, if only for the moment.

Yet rarely has a move provoked more sheer head-scratching as the yen leaped higher, which also has come against the euro, which in turn has risen versus the greenback. (Currencies are always traded in pairs, demonstrating the principle aptly articulated years ago by that great monetary theorist, Henny Youngman. In response to the query, “How’s your wife?” he replied, “Compared to what?”)

Currency-market mavens suspect that the counterintuitive rise in the yen and the euro in the past few weeks might be a result of some secret deal to stabilize exchange rates following the steep 25% rise in the U.S. Dollar Index from mid-2014 to its recent peak in early 2016. Since then, the index is off about 6%—even though the Fed made its first rate hike in December and the rest of the world’s central banks are easing monetary policy.

The fall in the greenback and rise in the yen probably reflect speculative flows, says John Vail, chief global strategist at Nikko Asset Management. But it also could indicate a “detente in the currency wars,” he added in a phone conversation on Friday.

Similarly, John Brady, managing director at Chicago futures broker R.J. O’Brien, suggests that global monetary authorities at the Feb. 26 Group of 20 meeting in Shanghai agreed to “cease and desist from additional beggar-thy-neighbor, currency-devaluation monetary policies.”

The European Central Bank adopted additional easing measures last month, including pushing rates further into negative territory. But, Brady observes, it also pledged to support corporate credits on bank balance sheets, such as troubled commodity companies Petrobras (PBR) and Glencore (GLEN.UK). That would mean no further rate cuts to depreciate the euro.

Similarly, Brady continues, the BOJ isn’t expected to further reduce rates or take other easing measures at its policy meeting on April 27 and is likely to eschew further currency depreciation to spur the Japanese economy. That would be in accord with the “whispered” agreement at the Feb. 26 G-20 meeting.

But here’s the rub: China’s currency, the yuan or renminbi. What the world (and U.S. politicians) watch is its exchange rate against the dollar. The yuan has strengthened, from 6.60 to the greenback in January to 6.47 on Friday, but still is weaker than when it was devalued from 6.20 last August. As the yen has gained on the buck, it has risen some 16.5% against the yuan, a bitter pill for Japanese exporters to swallow, he adds. That helps explain why Japan’s Topix is down 16.8% in dollar terms over that span.

WHILE FOREIGN EXCHANGE is the world’s biggest market, with some $5 trillion changing hands daily, it’s not what most readers of this space are most concerned about. Moves in currencies have implications for other asset classes, including stocks.

The yen’s rise also could be the “canary in a coal mine for global risk assets,” according to BCA Daily Insights. Japan’s currency and stock markets tend to be leading indicators for the U.S. equity market, having peaked ahead of the major tops in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index in 2000 and 2007.

There could be two reasons for this, BCA continues. The yen is a “funding currency”; that is, it’s borrowed to finance investments in other, higher-yielding assets in good times. When the tide turns and those positions are unwound, the yen borrowings are repaid, boosting demand for the currency.

In addition, JPMorgan economist Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou writes, reversal of yen currency hedges—a popular strategy that has been used in U.S. exchange-traded funds—by overseas buyers of Japanese stocks could have been huge this year: some $288 billion. BCA adds, “Because of demographic head winds, the Japanese economy is driven by the global business, as opposed to organic domestic demand. Weakness in Japanese stocks could herald slower global growth.”

Weak global growth was cited as a drag for the U.S. economy by Fed Chair Janet Yellen on Thursday evening, in a unique discussion with her three predecessors, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and Paul Volcker. That has provided justification for the Fed to hold off from further rate hikes, even with full employment and 2% inflation, its domestic mandates having largely been met.

Three-quarters of the economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal last week thought the Fed would raise interest rates again in June (only one out of 69 thought a hike was coming at the April 26-27 meeting). Presumably, their forecasts are based on the U.S. economy having met the Fed’s criteria. But the federal-funds futures market on Friday put the chances of a hike at just 16% by June and a shade under 50% by December, according to Bloomberg calculations.

If the futures market is right—and it has been more on target than economists and the Fed—its forecast would jibe with the central bank’s increased sensitivity to global economic and financial conditions. And staving off Fed rate hikes, while the ECB and BOJ cut rates, would support a pact to stabilize rate hikes, if such a scheme exists.

All circumstantial evidence, of course. But these money maneuvers seem to be having more impact than politics, for now.

>>> Esegur up for sale, bidders include Prosegur and Loomis

Esegur up for sale, bidders include Prosegur and Loomis
Esegur, the Portuguese security company, has been put on the block by its owners Novo Banco and Caixa Geral de Depositos (CGD), a source familiar and two sources briefed on the situation said.

Haitong and Caixa Banco de Investimento (CaixaBI) both have mandates on the sell-side, said the first source briefed. Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are beginning to circulate, said the second source briefed. The auction is likely to begin in earnest in the next couple of weeks, said the source familiar.

Half of Esegur is owned by Portuguese bank Novo Banco, formerly Banco Espirito Santo, while the other half is in the hands of state-owned bank CGD.

CGD declined comment. Novo Banco, Haitong and Esegur did not reply to requests for comment. CaixaBI confirmed the deal, but declined to provide details.

Companies interested in Esegur include Prosegur [BME:PSG], Loomis and other international security series players, said the first source.

Prosegur declined to comment. Loomis did not respond to requests for comment.

Cash-in-transit and cash processing are key businesses for Prosegur's growth, said a person familiar with its thinking. Its last deal in the sector was the acquisition of a 33.33% stake of SBV Services of South Africa in February for EUR 19m.

Esegur is the largest Portuguese-owned full service security firm operating in Portugal with annual sales of around EUR 55m.

Barron's : Should Disney Buy Netflix?

Should Disney Buy Netflix?

Walt Disney (DIS) has a lot of problems these days. ESPN is losing viewers; the heir apparent to CEO Bob Iger was just forced out of the company; and one analyst even finds cause for concerns in its booming film business. BTIG’s Richard Greenfield has a solution to all these problems: Disney should buy Netflix (NFLX). He explains why:

Barring a corporate restructuring, the other option for Disney is making large acquisitions to transform its business mix.

Netflix is already a great friend of Disney, in fact, Iger has repeatedly acknowledged how they are in part responsible for Netflix’s success. Disney continues to sell more and more content to Netflix spanning movies and television series, while at the same time struggling to get their own direct-to-consumer content business off-the-ground in the UK.

While we have been quite skeptical that ESPN can go direct-to-consumer, if ESPN were bundled in with Netflix — it would give Netflix the one form of content it does not have in its march to replace linear TV — “live sports.” Combining Disney and Netflix effectively recreates the best of the legacy video bundle, removes the distributor, packaging together great content with best-in-class technology spanning all devices consumers love to use. But the really exciting aspect for Disney, would be to bring in a visionary CEO, who understands the future of content and video programming in Reed Hastings. For Netflix, they get permanent access to the content creation of the world’s most prolific studio. On the other hand, it is quite hard to conceive how Netflix’s great price/value equation is sustainable if it has to incorporate overpriced/inefficient content such as ESPN…

Buying Netflix is an awfully expensive acquire, but it could be Disney’s only hope. Disney’s market cap is currently $157 billion and its enterprise value is $176 billion compared to Netflix’s $45 billion market cap and enterprise value.

We doubt Disney’s board comprehends just how much trouble their broadcast/cable network assets are facing to seek a transaction so near-term dilutive as Netflix, especially given the incredible success they are having content-wise in 2016.

Shares of Walt Disney have dropped 0.3% to $95.87 at 12:19 p.m. today, while Netflix has fallen 1.3% to $103.14.

Barron's : Marked-Down Carrefour Looks Like a Bargain


Marked-Down Carrefour Looks Like a Bargain

The French retailer has seen its stock beaten down. But with more low-priced foods and higher emerging-market sales, the company could see its shares rise 20%.

Shares of French retailer Carrefour have been marked down in 2016, but worries about its growth prospects may be overblown, and the stock could offer a 20% upside.


Carrefour (ticker: CA.France) has lost over a quarter of its value in the past 12 months, outpacing an 18% fall in the Stoxx Europe 600 in the same period, and more than double the 9.3% decline among the index’s retail components.
At Friday’s close in Paris of 23.56 euros ($26.88), Carrefour had a market capitalization of €17.35 billion. Europe’s leading retailer by sales has American depositary receipts listed in New York under the ticker CRRFY that were trading on Friday at $5.37. Five Carrefour ADRs are equivalent to one ordinary share.
Carrefour’s Euronext-listed shares trade for just 13.8 times and 12.4 times estimated earnings for this year and next, respectively. In comparison, Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), the world’s largest retailer, trades at pricier multiples of about 16 for 2016 and 2017.
Carrefour operates some 12,200 stores in 30 countries in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. It pursues an omnichannel approach, owning hypermarkets, supermarkets, and convenience stores, as well as cash-and-carry outlets for food professionals.
In recent years, the French company has sharpened its focus on groceries and invested in low-priced offerings and promotions, as sales of nonfood items declined. As a result, sales are growing steadily, but profit margins are thin.


Net income last year was up 7.1%, to €1.13 billion, or €1.54 per share, on sales of €76.95 billion. Carrefour this year is forecast to post net income of €1.21 billion, or €1.70 a share, on €77.38 billion in sales. Next year, it is projected to earn €1.36 billion, or €1.90 a share, on sales of €80.08 billion.
In France, which accounts for 47% of sales, Carrefour is expanding its network of convenience stores as consumer habits shift from filling their carts once a week to buying less, but more often.
The convenience strategy is paying off, though the company still sees a future for its hypermarkets, which account for roughly two-thirds of sales. Sales were up last year 1.1% in France and 1.2% in Europe, aided by economic recoveries in Spain and Italy.
This is hardly a breakneck pace, but with stronger performances in emerging markets, which generate more than a quarter of sales, annual growth of 3% over the longer term is achievable.
Last year, Carrefour reported a 3% rise in sales, thanks to 7.6% growth in emerging markets. A strong showing in Latin America, where sales were up 16%, more than offset a 9.5% decline in Asia, which was dragged down in part by China’s economic slowdown.


The company’s operating margin in 2015 was 2.4%. Morningstar analyst Ken Perkins reckons that Carrefour could cut costs to achieve an average operating margin of 3% over the next five years.
IN FRANCE LAST YEAR, Carrefour’s operating margin slipped to 3.3% from 3.6% due to the cost of integrating a chain of budget stores that it had acquired, and the transfer of rental income from shopping malls to a joint venture. However, the biggest dent came in Asia, which saw a drop in its profit margin to 0.2% from 1.5%.
The company launched its emerging-market foray ahead of most of its rivals and, as a result, has made deeper inroads. Still, it may need to invest more in those regions to generate attractive returns.
Carrefour plans to hike capital expenditures this year to €2.5 billion to €2.6 billion from €2.4 billion last year to continue the expansion of its network, modernization of its stores, and acceleration in the development of e-commerce channels. Most of that probably will be spent in France.
Following an improvement in free cash flow to €951 million last year, Carrefour’s balance sheet is in good shape. Net debt at the end of 2015 stood at €4.55 billion after repayment of more than €400 million.
On a depreciated cash flow and a sum-of-the-parts basis, Carrefour’s shares could be worth €28 in 12 months’ time, according to analysts at Morgan Stanley, pointing to potential upside of about 20%.
That assessment could be conservative. A consensus of analysts’ estimates points to a price target of €29.23, suggesting gains of as much as 24%. On top of that, the company also offers a generous 3% dividend yield.
Brazilian investor Abilio Diniz seems to like what he sees. In March, his investment vehicle, Peninsula Holdings, raised its stake in Carrefour to 8.05% from 5.1%. Carrefour’s largest shareholder is France’s Moulin family, which owns about 10%.
Carrefour may still be in the reduced-price section, but that may prove to be a good entry point.

>>> Weekly Update

Weekly Market Update: Meandering Markets Await Clearer Signals

US equity markets drifted lower this week in low-volume trading. With little weighty US or global economic data on the calendar, trading sentiment was knocked around by the vagaries of the oil market and the continuing weaker dollar trend. Traders scanned the ECB and Fed minutes in vain for more direction on the institutions' monetary policy views. Interest rates declined globally with US Treasury yields falling to one month lows. Banking stocks continued to face strong headwinds with several managements outlining the difficult environment financial institutions still face. Meanwhile, the US government worked hard to crush several high-profile merger deals. Next week looks pretty light of data as well, although the slow-moving spring quarter earnings season is rapidly approaching. For the week, the S&P500 slipped 1.2%, the DJIA lost 1.2%, and Nasdaq fell 1.3%.

The yen's big move higher - the Japanese currency edged up to 18-month highs against the dollar, with USD/JPY dropping as low as 107.75 - was a big theme this week. The end of the Japanese fiscal year in March brings plenty of yen inflows, as Japan's corporations are required by law to repatriate their overseas profits. However, the Bank of Japan continues to stay away from any big new stimulus programs, the government has refused to consider a 2016/17 extra budget frontloaded with additional stimulus spending, and PM Abe's has made it clear the sales tax will rise to 10% in April 2017 as scheduled, giving traders plenty of reasons to go long yen. Technical considerations played a role, too: the 110 level was a big magnet, as that was the key level breached when the BoJ launched its surprise QE enlargement at the end of October 2014 expanding its asset base to ¥80T. As the USD/JPY breached the 110 level, reports emerged that the BoJ might further expand the asset base at its upcoming April meeting. Government officials repeated all week that they were watching yen strength with concern, but there was no evidence of intervention, especially given Japan is hosting the G7 in May, and Japan has no desire to be seen as an FX manipulator ahead of the meeting given its

The minutes from the March 16th FOMC meeting did little to change the messaged crafted by Chair Yellen in her post-decision press conference or her speech last week: to assure the expansion stays on track, policy will respond to growth threats as much as it does to actual data. The minutes showed several members agreed that hiking rates in April would signal an unjustified sense of urgency, although a couple of hawks had advocated a March hike - in remarks later in the week, Fed Governor George said she voted for a 25 bps hike in March on concerns about creating financial imbalances. Separately, hawk Mester refrained from saying when the Fed should hike next, and also emphasized that the Fed was not behind the curve. Fed fund futures were pricing in less than a 20% chance of a June rate hike as of Friday.

Minutes from the last ECB meeting complicated the policy picture somewhat. The minutes showed the committee did not rule out more rate cuts at the March meeting and judged there was little evidence of unwelcome side effects from negative rates. Recall that during the post-meeting press conference back in March, Mario Draghi stated that he did not anticipate any more rate cuts as the ECB turned to other instruments, which helped fuel the current streak of euro strength. The minutes this week indicated that several council members were willing to consider deeper rate cuts and that future cuts remain on the table. EUR/USD spiked to fresh six-month highs ahead of the release of the minutes, trading up to around 1.4550, but the pair remained rangebound in the 1.1340-1.1420 area this week.

The two-week long slide lower in crude prices bottomed on Monday, with WTI dropping to around $35.50 and Brent to around $37.40. After some uncertainty in recent comments, the Iranians and the Russians both confirmed that Iran would attend the OPEC/non-OPEC production freeze negotiations in Doha on April 17th, although Tehran continues to insist it would only participate in the freeze after its domestic production level rises back to the pre-sanction level of 4.0M bpd. Last week, the Saudis were threatening not to participate in the freeze unless all other producers agreed to the deal. On Friday, the Russians said the deal would likely freeze production at January levels. Separately, weekly inventory reports showed that US crude stocks have started to be drawn down again after nearly two months of big builds. Those drawdowns along with the weaker greenback ushered WTI oil prices back up to just under $40/bbl by Friday afternoon.

Tesla disclosed that it had received 325K Model 3 orders in the first week after the vehicle's debut, indicating to about $14B in future sales. This is nine months ' worth of production under CEO Musk's goal of 500K unit per annum by 2020, and earlier in the week Musk had taken to Twitter to ponder whether he may have been too conservative in his outlook. Some analyst said their estimates were as high as 350K units, and on April 4th Tesla said its first quarter deliveries would only be 14,820 units, versus the 16K guidance it offered back in February. Shares of TSLA gained 10% on the week.

The US Treasury published tough new regulations aimed at tax inversions. The new rules would prevent foreign companies from acquiring multiple US firms over a short period of time, with a new three-year limit on foreign companies bulking up on US assets to avoid ownership requirements for a later inversion deal. Last fall, the Treasury made its first attempt to stop inversions, forbidding them in transactions where continuing ownership of the US parent in the deal is 60-80%. The rules were at least in part implemented to stop the Allergan/Pfizer deal. Just after the first regulations were announced last fall, Pfizer agreed to acquire 59% of Irish firm Allergan in an inversion deal. But Allergan itself was built by serial acquisitions: US firm Actavis bought Irish firm Warner Chilcott in an inversion, then it acquired Forest Labs and finally Allergan, taking the latter's name but remaining in Ireland. Pfizer abandoned the Allergan buy the day after the new rules were announced. There were concerns about Shire's acquisition of Baxalta, and shares of both firms sank on the rule change, although the companies claim the deal is not an inversion.

Separately, the Justice Department sued to stop Halliburton from acquiring rival Baker Hughes, in a deal currently valued around $34 billion that was announced in November 2014 (just as oil prices started to fall). The DoJ said it would not allow deals that enhance shareholder value at expense of competition. The BHI-HAL tie-up would combine two of the world's three leading providers of services to oil and gas companies. The companies were said to have made last-ditch efforts to save the combination, but that the DoJ was uninterested in the various remedies offered.

>>> US Close Dow+0.20% S&P+0.28% Nasdaq+0.05% Russell_+0.41%


Closing Market Summary: Indices End Week Lower as Heavyweights Weigh

The stock market ended a bumpy week on a flat note as the major averages spent the day in a steady retreat off their morning highs. Today's trade also featured a rally in crude oil, continued strength from the yen, and the underperformance of the heavily-weighted health care (-0.4%) and technology (UNCH) spaces. In addition, the Atlanta Fed lowered its GDPNow forecast for Q1 to 0.1% from 0.4%. The Nasdaq Composite (+0.1%) ended the week behind both the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.2%) and the S&P 500 (+0.2%).

The major averages began their day on a higher note as a rally in crude oil and developments overseas stoked risk-appetite. Early headlines cited a downturn in the yen and Italy's new bad-bank fund for the upticks abroad. Additionally, a stronger than expected reading of February exports from Germany (+1.3%; expected +0.5%) also boosted sentiment. As a result, the benchmark index began its day higher by 0.9%.

However, despite a persisting rally in crude oil, equities pulled away from their highs shortly after a lower than expected reading in the February Wholesale Inventories Report led to a revision in the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow forecast. First quarter GDP growth was revised to 0.1% from 0.4%. As a note, the initial estimate on February 1 was for 1.2% growth.

By the end of the day, eight sector remained in the green with energy (+2.0%), materials (+1.0%), industrials (+0.6%), and consumer staples (+0.5%) outperforming. On the flipside, consumer discretionary (-0.5%), health care (-0.4%), and technology (UNCH) led the downside.

Commodity-sensitive energy (+2.0%) topped the board as the space benefited from a 6.7% ($39.75/bbl) gain in WTI crude. Today's rally precedes next weekend's highly anticipated meeting between OPEC and non-OPEC members, which is expected to yield a production cap agreement between major producers.

Money center banks outperformed in the financial (+0.4%) sector as the sub-group responded to headlines, which reported that Italy's bad-bank fund might relieve pressure in the country's banking group as early as Monday. Separately, life insurance names slipped from their best levels as the sub-group responded to the appeal filed by the FSOC in MetLife's (MET 41.89, -0.03) hearing to have its "Too Big to Fail" designation removed. A reversal of the initial decision would result in a larger capital requirement and increased government oversight of the company.

In the health care space (-0.4%), a pullback in biotech component Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN 404.94, -13.54) resulted in a pullback in the broader sub-group. To be fair though, the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 277.35, -3.35) was up as much as 6.5% this week, before pulling back and ending the week higher by 3.4%. Meanwhile, Dow component Pfizer (PFE 32.31, -0.45) ended its day as the second worst performer in the price-weighted index.

Retail names and apparel companies demonstrated relative weakness in the consumer discretionary sector (-0.5%) as comparable sales readings for March disappointed investors. On that note, Gap (GPS 23.85, 3.83) tumbled 13.8% after reporting that comparable sales fell 6.0% in March.

The U.S. Dollar Index (94.22, -0.27) abandoned early strength as the yen rebounded from overnight losses. The dollar/yen pair finished lower by 0.1% (108.15) after trading as high as 108.44. Separately, the euro gained 0.2% against the greenback to end at 1.1400.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury note rose to 1.72% from 1.69% on Thursday. This represents a six-basis point increase from last week's settlement at 1.78%.

Participation on the NYSE floor was below the recent averages as fewer than xxx million shares changed hands.

Today's economic data was limited to the February Wholesale Inventories Report:

  • Wholesale inventories declined 0.5% in February (consensus -0.2%). That marked the fifth straight monthly decline after January saw a sizable downward revision to -0.2% from an originally reported 0.3% increase.
    • The decline in wholesale inventories will compute negatively in the inventory forecast for first quarter GDP. The Atlanta Fed's model forecast for real GDP growth in the first quarter was just 0.4% before the release of the Wholesale Inventories report.
    • The biggest driver of the February downturn was nondurable inventories, which declined 1.1%. The biggest drags there were farm products (-4.2%), drugs (-3.5%), and apparel (-1.3%).
    • Durable inventories declined 0.1% as a 2.0% increase in electrical inventories was offset by a 1.0% decline in both automotive and metals inventories.
    • Wholesale sales declined 0.2% in February on the heels of a downwardly revised 1.9% decline (from -1.3%) in January.
    • The wholesale inventories to sales ratio dipped to 1.36 from 1.37 in January, although it remained well above the 1.31 reading from the same period a year ago.

There will be no economic data of note released on Monday, but China will release March CPI and PPI data at 21:30 ET on Sunday. 

  • Russell 2000 -3.5% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite -3.1% YTD
  • S&P 500 +0.1% YTD
  • Dow Jones +0.9% YTD