>>> Walt Disney: Color on Quarter -- >DIS -1.4% premarket testing support near $

Walt Disney: Color on Quarter -- >DIS -1.4% premarket testing support near $95.
  • Macquarie upgraded to Outperform.
  • RBC: Disney's overall results were incrementally positive but structurally neutral. Solid (but not leading) EPS growth + sentiment overhang = Sector Perform as they maintain their $103 price target. Disney is now trading at a P/E discount to the S&P500, which arguably reflects ongoing negative sentiment around cord-cutting, which has resulted in Media being largely left behind in the market rally. Disney is near the bottom end of their expected range of $95-105. They have an upward bias for now, as they think $95 is a support level and Parks fears should abate. They maintain their price target of $103, as they have yet to see the EPS acceleration that would make them structurally more positive.
  • Pivotal Research Group lowers their DIS tgt to $118 from $122. Results were punctuated by soft growth in cable affiliate revenues alongside news that the co would be investing in the technology division of MLBAM (BAM Tech) for $1bn. Concurrently, ESPN announced it will launch an OTT service. Incorporating slightly lighter long-term affiliate fee growth trends vs. prior expectations among other changes, they continue to see long-term value in Disney and recognize that investor sentiment is still too negative on the stock.
  • FBR & Co notes Disney paired F3Q16 earnings with the announcement of the oft-reported plan to take a 33% stake in Major League Baseball Advanced Media (MLBAM) for $1B. Disney coupled this with news of plans for an over-the-top version of ESPN later this year, meant to complement (not replace) the TV channel, and the disclosure that Disney's main channels will be part of DirecTV's planned over-the-top offer. Otherwise, segment profits topped their estimate, mainly because of margin upside at parks.
  • Needham notes pofits were driven primarily by the film segment, which offset underdelivery in TV and Consumer Products. What they liked most about FY3Q included: 1) the purchase of a 33% stake for $1B in BAMTech (slightly dilutive) 2) ESPN will be in DirecTV's skinny bundle; 3) the Sony Vue skinny bundle originally launched without ESPN. After mediocre adoption, they added ESPN and now have 100,000 subs. What they worry most about is: 1) Film and Parks strength (capital intensive, hit-driven) are offsetting weakness at TV and Consumer Products profits (high margin, lower risk), which suggests falling ROICs; and 2) Frozen comps suggest y/y declines in consumer products throughout FY16; Hold.

(Re/Code.net) Disney is investing $1 billion in streaming tech and will launch a

Disney is investing $1 billion in streaming tech and will launch a streaming sports network — but it won’t include ESPN
If cord-cutting ever gets bad, Disney now has an easier way to go direct to consumer.

Disney is buying a one-third stake in streaming video company BAM Tech for $1 billion and will eventually launch what it calls an ESPN-branded subscription streaming service that — here’s the important part — won’t include ESPN.
The deal values BAM Tech, backed by Major League Baseball, at $3 billion.
We told you about a potential deal between the two earlier this year, and now it’s official. The company also said the investment gives it the option to buy a majority stake down the road, which shows it’s pretty serious about streaming video.
Disney already sells some of its channels, including ESPN, to online streaming services like Dish’s Sling. But with its new investment Disney can stream stuff on its own and plans to sell a bunch of ESPN-type channels in a new subscription video service at some point in the future.

Crucially, it won’t include regular ESPN since that’s the channel that makes the most money for Disney, and selling it directly to consumers would hurt its standing with the cable and satellite distributors that already pay Disney a lot of money to carry the network.
But by owning a piece of the tech, Disney has an easy way to sell more of its content directly to consumers, and if cord-cutting ever gets really bad, it can include ESPN in the mix.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: CLNE +19.2%, OPGN +15.4%, ADVM +12.7%, YELP +12.6%, VSAR +11.5%, SUNW +10.7%, VRNS +9.6%, OCN+9%, DXPE +8.9%, BBSI +8.6%, COTV +7.7%, DHT +7.7%, NH +7.3%, YRD +7.3%, HCHC +7%, WATT +6.7%, INFI +5.6%,CDXS +5.3%, LITE +4.9%, HALO +4.8%, RYI +4.4%, JD +4.1%, XONE +3.7%, CEL +3.7%, GFI +3.6%, HL +3.3%, HLIT+3.3%, CRME +3.2%, SWC +3.1%, CDE +3.1%, AG +3.1%, KGC +3%, CPRX +2.8%, GOLD +2.5%, AUY +2.5%, GG +2.4%,ABX +2.4%, EDIT +2.4%, TCS +2.4%, SLV +2.3%, MUX +2.3%, GDX +2.2%, NEM +2.1%, AU +2%, TAHO +1.9%, MT +1.7%,WAGE +1.7%, RBCN +1.7%, IAG +1.6%, ICL +1.5%, BTG +1.4%, PTLA +1.1%, AEZS +1.1%, BHP +0.9%, GLD +0.8%, CYRN+0.8%

Gapping down: GEVO -32.6%, MYGN -30%, SPWR -29%, WGBS -24.8%, TDW -17%, PRGO -12.7%, YUME -10.2%, SIF -9.4%,RPRX -8.6%, GALE -7%, CYBR -5.5%, DPLO -5.1%, LSCC -4.8%, GPRE -4.6%, ARWR -4.5%, OHRP -4.4%, CALL -4.3%, ALDX-4.2%, KORS -4.2%, SEDG -3.8%, OA -3.8%, CALA -3.4%, CSIQ -3.3%, VSAT -3.3%, CLF -2.9%, OMER -2.8%, CONE -2.2%,SPPI -2.1%, VWR -2%, NVAX -2%, LOAN -1.8%, HTM -1.8%, CTSO -1.8%, FSLR -1.5%, PANW -1.5%, JKS -1.5%, DIS -1.4%,MATR -1.4%, SPHS -1.4%, ZBH -1.3%, TSL -1.1%, VRX -1.1%, JAZZ -1%, RIG -0.8%, XON -0.7%, MYL -0.7%, MDVN -0.7%,BIOA -0.7%, EPIQ -0.7%, LUV -0.7%, FTNT -0.5%

(Makor) Who is right, USD/JPY or Nikkei Index ?

Bottom line:  the divergence between USD/JPY and Nikkei needs to be solved in one out of two ways 1) a move lower in Nikkei or 2) USD/JPY needs to play catchup and move significantly higher. Given the long term technical setup I prefer option 2. I will stick to this view as long as USD/JPY trades above 99.02. Feedback welcomed !

 

Chart 1 Divergence between USD/JPY (White) & Nikkei Index (Orange): while the Nikkei Index managed to sustain its gains USD/JPY is falling back to the lower end of its 99/106 range.

 

 

Chart 2 Nikkei 225: The Index broke out from its declining channel making the bottom of wave ‘4’ (14,864) the new pivot level. Overall the Elliot wave setup favors a move higher over time.

 

 

Chart 3 USD/JPY: The CCY pair is trying to base above the 99.02 / 100.6 area. Looking at the wave structure it seems like we are either in some kind of basing process between 99.02 and 107.49 or did not hit a low yet.  

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Barry Lyss - Makor Capital

Sales Equities/Derivatives

 

(BofA-ML) Equity Client Flow Trends : Mid Cap sales at a post crisis High

Clients sell for 5th week; big mid cap sales; weak 3Q for buybacks
Last week, during which the S&P 500 climbed 0.4% to another new high, BofAML clients were net sellers of US stocks for the fifth consecutive week. Net sales of $0.8bn were smaller than the prior week’s ~$2bn, but all three client groups (hedge funds, institutional clients, and private clients) were net sellers again. Institutional clients led the selling, as has been true a majority of weeks this year. And similar to the prior week, clients sold stocks in all three size segments, with the biggest sales of mid caps (fourth-largest in our data history after near-record mid-cap outflows the week before). As we noted last week, mid caps are the most expensive size segment and have generally seen accelerating sales by our clients since earlier this year—four-week average net sales are their largest since mid ‘08 (Chart 25), and cumulative net sales of mid caps YTD are the largest in our data history (Chart of the Week, below). Buybacks by our corporate clients picked up last week, though QTD are tracking at their lowest levels of any comparable period since 2012.

Biggest sales of cyclicals, Health Care; Telecom buying continues
Clients sold stocks in six of the ten sectors last week, along with ETFs (a reversal from net buying of ETFs most weeks this year). Net sales were largest in Health Care and Consumer Discretionary, despite differing trends for these two sectors in 2Q results (most Health Care stocks have positively surprised, while Discretionary has seen a high proportion of sales misses). Tech, along with the defensive sectors of Telecom, Staples and Utilities, saw net buying by our clients last week, with flows into Tech stocks their largest in one year. Cyclical sectors continue to see larger net sales than defensive sectors, which has been true since late June. Telecom continues to have the longest net buying streak (for four consecutive weeks, or since mid-June when looking at four-week average flows).

Other notable flows: institutional clients’ sales nearing records
• Cumulative net sales by institutional clients YTD ($28 bn) have eclipsed sales by this group in 2015 ($26bn), though so far remain below 2013’s record ($33bn).
Redemptions from mutual funds amid poor performance is one likely contributor.
• Hedge funds, institutional clients and private clients all sold stocks in the Financials, Discretionary and Materials sectors last week. No sector saw net buying by all three.
• Pension fund clients were net buyers of US stocks for the third consecutive week. Similar to other institutional clients, Tech stocks saw the biggest buying from this group last week. Their biggest net sales were of Staples stocks. All three size segments saw inflows by this group last week. See Pension fund flows for details.

(DBK) Weekly Flows (wed-Wed) : review of funds’ in/outflows as % of funds’ AuM.

Fund investors still chose EM debt exposure as their preferred risk play, but became more discerned on credit funds over the past week. In a shift to quality, investment-grade bond funds hit 17-week high inflows while high-yield funds suffered their first redemption since June, the latter burdened by low oil prices and slightly receding risk appetite. In the IG space, European funds gained 2.5-year high inflows in the past week and UK funds in particular have experienced a very notable investor interest over the past few weeks – a position which now seems reassured with the BoE’s announcement of a corporate bond purchasing scheme.

Last week, EM surprises turned positive for the first time since June which – paired with the weak Q2 GDP number out of the US (but before the strong nonfarm payrolls last Friday) – led the market to put aside their worries of a hawkish Fed re-pricing. As such, EM equity funds sustained inflows for a fifth week but investors again showed selective tastes for risk exposure, preferring diversified GEM mandates over regional EM mandates (see top right chart). Overall, a combination of weak economic data releases (as of last Wednesday’s close) and an underwhelming stimulus package in Japan, put a more defensive flavour to flows compared to the week prior, with investors withdrawing from DM equities while topping up money market exposure.

(ZH) Bank Of England Suffers Stunning Failure On Second Day Of QE: "Goodness Kno

Bank Of England Suffers Stunning Failure On Second Day Of QE: "Goodness Knows What Happens Next Week"

It started off well enough.
On the first day of the Bank of England's resumption of Gilt QE after the central bank had put its monetization of bonds on hiatus in 2012, bondholders were perfectly happy to offload to Mark Carney bonds that matured in 3 to 7 years. In fact, in the first "POMO" in four years, there were 3.63 offers for every bid of the £1.17 billion in bonds the BOE wanted to buy.
However, earlier today, when the BOE tried to purchase another £1.17 billion in bonds, this time with a maturity monger than 15 years, something stunning happened: it suffered an unexpected failure which has rarely if ever happened in central bank history: only £1.118 billion worth of sellers showed up,meaning that the BOE's second open market operation was uncovered by a ratio of 0.96. Simplystated, the Bank of England encountered an offerless market.

What makes this particular failure especially notable - and troubling - is that while technically uncovered sales of government securities happen frequently, and Germany is quite prominent in that regard as numerous Bund auctions have failed to find enough demand in the open market in recent years forcing the "retention" of the offered surplus, when it comes to a central bank's buying of securities, there should be, at least in practice, full coverage of the operation as the central bank is willing and able to pay any price to sellers to satisfy its quota.
For example, in today's operation, the scarcity led to the BOE accepting all submissions, even as some investors offered prices above the prevailing market. The highest accepted price for the 4 percent bond due in 2060, for example, was 194.00, compared with a weighted average of 192.152, which means that the happy seller obtained a yield well in excess of that implied by the market.
And yet, despite having a completely price indiscriminate buyer, some £52 million worth of bond sellers simply refused to sell to the BOE at any price!
The QE failure quickly raised alarm signals among the bond buying community. In a Bloomberg TV interview, Luke Hickmore, an Edinburgh-based senior investment manager at Aberdeen Asset Management said that “lots of people are bidding us for bonds -- Mark Carney is now bidding me for bonds and he still can’t have them. The problem is he was trying to buy 15-year plus bonds today in the gilt market. That’s a really difficult area.”
Needless to say, immediately after the news that not even the BOE can buy all the bonds it needs to buy at any price, yields on 10 and 30-year gilts quickly dropped to new record lows. "Yesterday we saw a 3.63 cover in the short APF so this is a sharp difference that has really caught the market off guard,” said Daniela Russell of Legal & General Group in London, cited by Bloomberg.
We were surprised they didn't slide even lower. After all, if even the central bank is met with an offerless market, there is simply no price that is high enough, as ludicrous as that may sound, for longer-maturity gilts because the last marginal seller can demand any price from the BOE and they will get it.
As Bloomberg notes, the BOE’s failure to reach its target on Tuesday is an early warning of the challenges it may face in expanding its QE plan. A big part of the problem for the central bank is that it already scooped up about a third of the U.K. government bond market as part of a program that started in March 2009. And, with yields already at all time lows, it has just run into the same problem that wewarned back in 2014 will haunt the BOJ: a lack of willing sellers. Ironically, even as the BOJ has stumbled from one monetary policy embarrassment to another, it never had a failed POMO. It was up to the Bank of England to demonstrate what a bond shortage really means.
But why the lack of sellers? Well, since the BOE paused purchases in 2012, global bond yields have tumbled, meaning investors may be less willing to part with longer-term bonds that tend to offer higher yields than their shorter-dated equivalents. Long-dated U.K. bonds are in particular demand from pension companies that hold the securities to match their liabilities.
“You’d understand why investors might not be keen to offload longer bonds - if you are looking for yields that’s the only place on the curve to be,” said Jason Simpson, a London-based fixed-income strategist at Societe Generale SA.
Longer-dated bonds are “an area where people are hunting down what yield is left - you have to extend out into that area to get anything really,” Aberdeen’s Hickmore said. Carney “is going to say ‘it’s very early days, this is day one of the long-end purchasing.’”
Whatever the reason, and however the BOE will try to justify this striking failure, Mark Carney has a major problem on his hands: according to last week's announcement, the BOE hopes to increase its holdings of government securities by 60 billion pounds ($78 billion) to 435 billion pounds over the next six months. However, if today is any indication, it will fail.
Tomorrow the market's attention will be fixated on the BOE's Asset Purchase Facility website (link) then another open market operation, this time in the seven- to fifteen-year sector, is scheduled to take place. Another uncovered failure like today, and alarm bells will be going off everywhere, not to mention that Gilt yields will implode.
Just as importantly, the BOE has said that "the Bank will announce its response to the shortfall in today's uncovered operation at 9am tomorrow."
We can't wait, and neither can SocGen's Jason Simpson: “It is a bit of a surprise that this went uncovered in the first week of the operation, goodness knows what happens next week.”

WSJ : Alibaba’s Ant Financial Strikes Deal With Ingenico for European Payments P

Alibaba’s Ant Financial Strikes Deal With Ingenico for European Payments Push
Ingenico will allow users of Ant’s Alipay to access its network of offline merchants in Europe

BEIJING—Ant Financial Services Group, the $60 billion financial-services affiliate of online shopping giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., is partnering with France’s Ingenico Group SA to push its mobile-payment system into Europe.
Paris-based payments provider Ingenico will allow users of Ant’s Alipay, China’s biggest online-payments platform by transaction volume, to access Ingenico’s network of offline merchants in Europe, according to a person familiar with the situation. The collaboration comes after Ingenico disclosed in its latest earnings release an agreement to handle some of Alipay’s cross-border online payments.
While no investment will occur, a person familiar with the offline collaboration said Ingenico will receive service charges from Alipay users and expects to see their transaction volume grow. In 2015, Ingenico processed transactions in 170 countries; Alipay currently is accepted in 70 countries.
Ant’s push into Europe with the Ingenico partnership is the latest in its ambitious expansion plans. In June, it bought a 20% stake in Ascend Money, a Thai online-payment provider. A month earlier, Ant Financial orchestrated a collaboration with Uber Technologies Inc. that gives Alipay users the ability to pay for rides in the 68 countries where the ride-hailing service operates. This spring, Ant Financial hired Goldman Sachs Group Inc. veteran Douglas Feagin to spearhead its global push.
The Chinese company has forged other partnerships in Europe and elsewhere. It has collaborated with Wirecard and Concardis to offer mobile-payment services to Chinese tourists in Germany, France, the U.K. and Italy. Last year, it invested in India’s Paytm, one of the country’s largest mobile-payment platforms.

Ant Financial is flush with cash after closing a $4.5 billion fundraising round in April, hanging the $60 billion valuation on the company. It has said in the past that it plans to list shares in an initial public offering, but hasn’t set a timetable yet.