(UBS) Zodiac Aerospace : H1 COI below expectations, full year guidance unchanged

H1 COI below expectations, full year guidance unchanged but challenging

Q: What were the most noteworthy areas in the results?
H1 COI came in at €80.4m (vs. UBSe €146, Bloomberg cons €142m) and includes a
€55m FX tailwind. Guidance for the full year remains unchanged at "COI close to the
level of FY 14/15" implying a challenging target for 2H COI of ~€230m vs. €136m
achieved in H2 FY15/16. Zodic expects the improvement to be driven by a positive
volume effect and a decrease in cost overruns. Zodiac expects to meet Net Debt/EBITDA
<3x covenant without taking into account the hybrid financing set in place. We
estimate that this implies a significant improvement in cash generation in H2 to ~
€360m vs. ~€120m generated in H2 2014/2015. The press release does not offer any
indication about FY 17 targets.
Q: How did the results compare vs. expectations?
Zodiac has already reported its H1 16 sales. Zodiac reported H1 16 group EBITA of
€80.4m (3.2% margin, UBSe €146m), of which Aerosafety EBITA of €50m (UBSe
€53m), Aircraft Systems EBITA of €103m (UBSe €109.4m) and Aircraft Interiors EBITA
loss of €-66m (UBSe -€10m).
Q: How would we expect investors to react?
We expect investor focus to be on: 1) cash and profit generation potential in 2H FY16
and beyond, 2) the learning curve progress on the A350 and C Series, 3) book to bill.
Valuation: trades on 17.3x EV/EBITA, 21.9x P/E
Our €17.5 price target is based on 9% WACC, 5 year profit growth of 18% CAGR
from FY15/16E and cash conversion of 82%, which implies a fair value multiple of
18.8x FY15/16E EV/EBITA.

>>> Street PRe Market Indications

ML
HEINEKEN: 1Q volumes strong, org beer volume +7% vs 2.4% cons.............+3%
WTB: Accor's UK revpar should help Whitbread today........................+2%
GENMAB: U/G guidance, projecting US revs of $400m-$450m vs 250-300 prev...+1%
TLSN: Revs 1.8% miss, but EBITDA 3% beat and '16 guidance raised..........+1%
ABB: Orders and profits beat consensus, Revenues in line..................+1%
VOD: We U/G to Buy, growth acceleration ahead, 3% upside to EBITDA........+1%
MONY: Revs +9%,insurance momentum improved,strong growth in credit cards..+1%
SYNGENTA: Q1 sales flat in local currency, down 7% in USD................unch
ARM: 1Q16 revenues 2% ahead, EPS 1% ahead of consensus...................unch
GKN: Group revs £2,179mn, +1% organic, in-line with cons £2,168mn........unch
BLT: inline w our forecasts, 4% cut to iron ore guidance expected.........-1%
ACCOR:1Q16 Group RevPAR +0.4% in line driven by France -2.5% v BofA -4%...-1%
HOCHSCHILD: Q1 production in line, Net Debt slightly better...............-1%
ASML: Q1 revs €1.3bn, EBIT €231m in-line, Q2 guide +1% ahead of cons......-2%
BUNZL: Q1 IMS inline, though lack of new bolt-on M&A might disappointment.-2%
HANDELSBANKEN: Net Income miss (4.04bn vs 4.18bn). Fee Income fell 6%.....-3%
ZODIAC: 1H results, big miss on op profit & further risks from FAA recall.-5%
CS
ABB +1% Op profit 5% beat, orders better, USD50m one off
Accor +2-3% 1Q revs slightly light, Jin Jiang's stake risen to 14.98%
Arm +1-2% Q1 Rev 276.4 mln est 272.6mln
ASML -1-2% 2Q rev outlook beats ests, gross margin light
Autos -1% Mitsubishi motors -18%, improper fuel economy tests
Banco Sab M/P CS reinstate with NEUTRAL (Valuation)
BHP Billiton -2% FY16 prod inline, expectations met in all key businesses
Brown Group -1% FY revs 1.5% beat, challenging mkt conditions
Bunzl M/P H1 underlying revs flat YoY
Gam -3-4% AuM Chf67.3b (CSe 70.8b), cautious on outlook
Genmab M/P Updates financial guidance inline with market
GKN M/P Statement inline with market expectations
Heineken +2-3% Beer volumes strong +7% est +2.4%
Hochschild M/P On track to achieve its full year production target
Miners -1% Copper -0.25%, Brent -2.45%, Iron Ore +0.65%, China -4.01%
Moneysuper M/P Trading inline, confident of meeting its FY outlook
Novozymes -1% Co keeps guidance for the FY, cuts EBIT growth
Oil -2% Oil lower o/n, Brent -2.45% to $42.95, WTI -2.9% to $39.9
Paddy Power -2% CS reinstate with UNDERPERFORM (Cost synergies poor)
Punch Tav +2% LFL Net income growth of 1.6%, disposals ahead of target
Repsol -2-3% CaixaBank may sell stake for BPI deal
Rentokil +1-2% Org growth in Q1 was 2.8% (vs 1.8% last year)
SAP M/P No's inline with pre-announce, re-iterates 2016 forecast
SHB -2% Adj Net 4% miss, NII 1% light, fees 4% below
TeliaSonera +2-3% Numbers better and raises profit outlook
Telefonica -1-2% CaixaBank may sell stake for BPI dea
Temenos +2% Sales up 24% yoy, management confirmed its 2015 outlook
Trav Perk +2% Q1 LFL 4.2% mkt around 3.5-4%
Virgin Money M/P Short trading statement inline with expectations
Zodiac -3% H1 revs inline, op income looks light
MF
ABB-Ebita 943m(865),Sales 7.903b(7.98),co sights slow China...........+1.3%
*SYNGENTA-Sales 3.74b(3.72),EMEA 1.75B(1.77),NA 986m(996),FCF '16 1b+..-0.5%
*ASML-Rev 1.33b(1.32),Net 198m(184),GM 42.6%(42.6),Q2 GM 42%(46%)......-2%
*ZODIAC-Rev 2.489b,Net 48.9m,Sees +ve vol effect in H2.................-5%
*SARTORIUS-Rev 301.9m(299),Ebitda 72.3m(71.13),NP 29.3m,FY ok..........+1%
*GAM-AUM CHF114.7b(117.8),H1 performance fees lower vs last yr.........-1.5%
*GENMAB-Raises 2016 f/casts as Darzalex drives sales...................+1%
*TEMENOS-Rev 129.4m(124.2),Lic Rev 26.9m(24),Ebit 22.2m(19.8)..........+1%
*SAP-Finals Op CF 2.48b,confirms FY guidance Rev 2.95-3.05b............+1%
*VONTOBEL-Q1 update client assets CHF142.3b,Q1 weaker lower activity...-1%
*FIELMANN-PT 54.1m,External Sales 372.1m,Cons Sales 316.4m.............-4%
*NOVOZYMES-Rev 3.61b(3.61),Ebit 950m(976),Net 745m(729),PT 955m(938)...+1%
*HEINEKEN-Cons Beer Vol 43.5(41.5),Org Beer Vol +7%(2.4),$ & € +ve.....+2%
*ACCOR-Rev 1.16b(1.19),LFL Sales +1.9%(0.3),Revpar Grth 0.4%...........+2%
*TELIA-Sales 20.4b(20.8),Ebitda 6.22b(6.01),Raises FY guidance.........+1%
*SVENSKA H/BK-Net Inc 4.04b(4.18),NII 6.8B(6.85b),FCI 2.17b(2.27)......-2%
Investec
* ABB-Q1 ebitda $943m Vs est $865m, cautious o'look re fx & oil..............+2%
* ACCOR-Q1 lfl sales +1.9%(est +0.3%),overall good start.....................+1%
* ASML-Q2 sales ahead at €1.7bn Vs €1.65bn, Q2 margin guidance light.........-1%
* CARLSBERG- +ve read from HEIA results, we traded 250k y’day, ongoing flow..+1%
* GAM-Q1 AUM falls 4%, sees lower H1 performance fees........................-1%
* GENMAB-raises FY guidance on Darzalex royalties............................+5%
* HEINEKEN-Q1 org beer vols +7%(est +2.4%),looks blowout but keeps guidance..+3%
* NOVOZYMES-Q1 rev in line,net btr. FY sales lwrd on FX,unch on org basis....-1%
* SAP-Q1 confirms pre announced data, confirms guidance......................+1%
* SARTORIUS-Q1 sales and ebitda look small beat, confirms guidance...........+1%
* SHB-Q1 net misses by 3.5%, fees & comms 4% light, CETR1 ratio ok...........-2%
* SYNGENTA-Q1 in line,ChemChina deal complete by yr end(in line)............unch
* TELIA-Q1 sales in line, ebitda 3% ahead, raises FY ebitda guidance.........+2%
* TEMENOS-Q1 looks solid, confirms guidance, hear -ve broker comment away....+1%
* VOPAK-AGM today, confirms outlook, shares volatile last few days...........U/C
* ZODIAC AERO-H1 miss, keeps guidance(mkt won't believe), hit 3% into close..-5%
* ARM HDGS-Q1.Sales ahead, PTP a miss.See FY rev in line.Weak into stmtn...+2%
* BHP Billiton - Q3 In line.Cuts Iron Ore g'nce. Sector Strong ..................+2%
* BUNZL-Q1.Rev +13%,Trends similar to H2 '15. In line with exp's.
.........unch
* ENTEQ-Update. In line with exp's. Chairman stepping down in Sept........unch
* GB GROUP.PreClose.Inc's FY adj. op. pft g'nce to £13.4m.CEO to retire....+2%
* GKN-Q1.Rev +12%, margins lowers. O/look mixed............................-1%
* MONEYS'MKT-Q1.Rev +9%.Confident in meeting FY exp's......................+1%
* N BROWN-FY.FY in-line,trading since year-end subdued.....................-2%
* PUNCH TAVERNS-H1,in-line with management exp's,disposals prog' ahead.....+1%
* RENTOKIL-Q1.Integration of Steritech going well.Conf FY will be i/l.....unch
* TRAVIS PERKINS-Q1, in-line, LFL sales growth of 4.2%.....................+1%
* VIRGIN MONEY-Q1.In-line with est's.Investor meeting today(credit cards).unch

(JPM) Marine Seismic : it’s going to get worse before it gets any better

1Q16 previews and model updates – it’s going to get worse before it gets any better

TGS’ profit warning earlier this month confirmed the negative momentum
building across the seismic space. We now anticipate seismic demand
declining by ~30% in 2016 (after the 34% fall in 2015) and remaining
broadly flat in 2017. Against this backdrop, we think contract segment
margins will remain in the red and MC impairments should continue. We
continue to forecast both PGS and CGG risk breaching their covenants by
end-2016 and that both will likely need another round of renegotiations
with lenders. We continue to advise caution across the sector and remain
UW PGS, and N CGG and TGS. For an investor bullish on the oil price,
we recommend exposure to the relatively higher-quality TGS.
* Seismic demand to remain weak through 2017. We expect seismic
demand to decline by ~30% in 2016, implying demand could be only
~40% of 2012 peak levels (in $ terms). We sense some hope in the
market for a recovery in 2017. However, we forecast E&P capex
declining by another 10% in 2017 and, thus, forecast seismic demand
remaining broadly flat as a base case.
* Contract and MC markets to remain challenged. This weak demand
may require further correction from the supply side to keep a floor under
day-rates. When the market does recover (2017E+), we think day-rates
are likely to remain below previous mid-cycle levels due to the
significant stacked vessel capacity available to the market. Vessel
utilization in 2016 should be helped by the relatively robust multi-client
(MC) capex by vessel operators (Figure 5). We forecast sector MC late
sales declining by another 30% in 2016 and anticipate another round of
MC impairments at YE16.
* Sufficient liquidity, but covenant renegotiations likely required. Post
the successful capital raising, both the levered seismic companies (CGG
and PGS) have sufficient liquidity to last until YE17, in our opinion.
However, we continue to forecast both companies likely requiring
another round of renegotiations from their respective lenders or risk
breaching their covenants by YE16. We think CGG’s capital structure
remains unsuitable for the company and expect the company to address
this in 2017 (link to note).

(JPM) Weir Group : Divergent trends in fracking activity and oil price.

The year is likely to have started on a very weak note with little to suggest we
are about to reach cyclical troughs. We expect the overall order inflow to be
down by 20%, or more, even after taking into account the favourable tailwind
from exchange rates. Given the current uncertain outlook for the oil & gas and
mining industries in terms of capex spending and aftermarket demand together
with the subsequent risk to earnings expectations for Weir, we believe the
shares should trade at a discount to the sector in the near-term. With ~30%
downside to our price target we are maintaining our Underweight
recommendation.
 Weak start to the year. The trading update is due to be released on 28
April. We expect this to show a 45% decline in order inflow for the Oil &
Gas division, which we expect to limit the near-term recovery potential for
this division. We expect the combination of weak demand and increase
price pressure to translate into a 10% decline in order for the Minerals
division, with both the OE and aftermarket falling.
 Share price bounce reflects commodity price rise, not fundamentals.
We do not believe the bounce in commodity prices (WTI or metals) since
the publication of Weir's full-year results has been sufficient to translate
into improved demand. For example, the rig count has continued to fall and
is down 30% over the period, despite a >50% increase in the WTI price. We
believe that the financial challenges of many operators in the fracking and
mining industries limits the scope for a recovery in demand in equipment
the absence of a significant increase in commodity prices and/or
consumption.
 Downside to forecasts remains. The operating profit delivered for 2015
was 40% below Bloomberg consensus at the start of 2015. Given the
prospect of ongoing weakness in demand, both OE and aftermarket, and the
prospect of increased downward pressure on aftermarket prices, particularly
in the Mining division, we believe there remain above-average downside
risks to consensus expectations.
 Valuation. Based on our revised forecasts, the group is trading 2016E
EV/EBITDA, EV/EBITA and PE multiples of 12.4x, 16.1x and 19.6x,
respectively. This leaves Weir trading at a significant premium to our
industrial universe, with an above-average risk to forecasts, in our view.

FT : Saudi Arabia takes out $10bn in bank loans

Saudi Arabia takes out $10bn in bank loans

Saudi Arabia is raising $10bn from a consortium of global banks as the kingdom embarks on its first international debt issuance in 25 years to counter dwindling oil revenues and reserves.
The landmark five-year loan, a signal of Riyadh’s newfound dependence on foreign capital, opens the way for Saudi to launch its first international bond issue. It comes as the sustained slump in crude encourages other Gulf governments, such as Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Oman, to tap international bond markets.

The oil-rich kingdom, which last weekend blocked a potential deal among oil producers to freeze output and bolster prices, has burnt through $150bn in financial reserves since late 2014 as its fiscal deficit is set to widen to 19 per cent of gross domestic product this year.
Strong interest in the loan, especially from Asian banks, came despite rating agency downgrades on Saudi creditworthiness since the oil price collapsed. The government raised the amount it wanted to borrow from $6bn-$8bn to $10bn after the deal was oversubscribed.
“The deal is very successful, with very competitive pricing,” said Elyas Algaseer, deputy regional general manager at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. “There was immense market appetite.”
Saudi Arabia may now raise its first global bond in the wake of the loan deal, bankers said. Institutions that loaned the most would be set to benefit from a mandate to help Riyadh raise the bond.
“The loan is a way for Saudi Arabia to test the waters and set up an international borrowing profile,” said Ewen Cameron Watt, chief investment strategist at BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager. “This is paving the way for the kingdom to transform from a creditor nation into a debtor nation. It's a significant moment of change in debt markets.”
The strategy of raising debt overseas aims to slow the drawdown of foreign reserves and reduce pressure on local banks, which have been supporting state related companies and buying Saudi domestic bonds for almost a year.

The lead lenders, each pledging around $1.3bn, include Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, HSBC and JPMorgan, bankers say. Lenders were required to lend at least $500m to participate.
Mr Algaseer declined to comment on the pricing, but other bankers close to the deal said it had priced at around 120 basis points over US dollar Libor.
The loan is Saudi Arabia's first international debt issuance since 1991, when it raised around $1bn in the aftermath of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
Bankers are now confident that Saudi state-related companies will also seek to raise funds, using the sovereign loan, and later bond, as a benchmark.

Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the king’s powerful son who overseas economic reform, is set to publicise his “vision for Saudi Arabia”, a template for shifting the kingdom into a post-oil era, in Riyadh on April 25.
The “vision” is expected to give more details about the privatisation of state oil company Saudi Aramco, the creation of a sovereign wealth fund and other reforms to boost jobs and investment.
JPMorgan, which has decades of experience banking for Saudi Aramco, has been working with the state oil company since late last year on a plan for an initial public offering, people aware of the matter said.
Saudi Aramco is still evaluating how to organise any flotation, which could either list a portion of the holding company, or a collection of downstream assets, on the Saudi stock exchange. But Prince Mohammed has said he intends to float less than 5 per cent of the holding company by 2018.
The Saudi fundraising comes amid broader debt issuance as neighbouring oil economies also tap international markets.
Abu Dhabi has mandated Bank of America Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan and Citigroup to hold investor meetings this week ahead of the UAE capital’s third international bond.
“Abu Dhabi’s strong fundamentals should support strong demand for any issuance and provide a benchmark for corporates looking to raise debt,” said Ms Malik.
Qatar, which last year raised a loan of more than $5bn, has sent out a proposal request to lenders to manage an international bond issue, bankers said, and Lebanon has announced a sale of two bonds worth $1bn.
HSBC and JPMorgan declined to comment.

FT : Nuclear reactor clean-up weighs on EDF

Nuclear reactor clean-up weighs on EDF

French utility faces questions about whether it has set aside enough to decommission power plants


In 1997 French utility EDF started to dismantle its first nuclear power plant, a 30-year-old heavy water reactor in Brennilis, north-western France. It was expected to cost €250m.
The bill is now set to be at least half as much again, and the decommissioning is still not done. In fact, there has never been a full dismantling of a reactor in France, the only European country to get three-quarters of its electricity from nuclear power.
EDF, the operator of all 58 of France’s reactors, is preparing to build a new £18bn plant at Hinkley Point in the UK that some at the Paris-based company have warned is too dangerous given its stretched balance sheet. EDF’s other big reactor project, at Flamanville in France, is already six years behind schedule and €7.2bn over budget.

Hinkley and Flamanville have focused attention on another looming challenge for EDF: has the company set aside enough money to cover the huge cost of dismantling and cleaning up its existing nuclear power stations in France?
Unlike the UK, where the state has assumed much of the financial risk of taking apart nuclear reactors, in France it all falls on EDF, which has established a €23bn special fund for this purpose.
The €23bn — much of it invested in equities and bonds — has been set aside to cover what EDF estimates will be the €54bn cost of decommissioning the 58 reactors and safely storing their radioactive waste. This includes €23bn for dismantling the power stations, and €26bn for managing spent fuel.
Yves Marignac, director of energy research group WISE-Paris, is one of several European academics who think that the true cost of decommissioning and waste disposal for EDF will be far more than the figure the company anticipates.
“The dismantling programme will cost more than EDF has estimated, maybe three times more,” he says. “It could potentially be disastrous for the group when they have to readjust their assumptions.”
EDF is simply too optimistic, adds Mr Marignac. According to figures published by the European Commission this month, France estimates it will cost €300m per gigawatt of generating capacity to take apart a nuclear reactor, far below Germany’s assumption at €1.4bn per GW and the UK of €2.7bn per GW.
The commission cautions against making comparisons between countries, because member states use different nuclear technologies, among other issues.
But to put things in context, Germany has set aside almost €38bn for the decommissioning of 17 nuclear reactors. France, with more than three times as many reactors, has €15bn less for the same process.
EDF and the French government say they are confident they can deliver on the decommissioning programme, helped by the standardisation of the country’s reactors compared to other countries.
France typically has multiple reactors on one site as well, which further reduces the costs. Brennilis was a prototype, a complicated early model and so “not representative” of the wider fleet of reactors, according to EDF.
In January, a government-commissioned report confirmed previous studies, the first of which was done in 1979, by estimating a cost of €309m per GW to dismantle France’s reactors.
Jean-Marie Chevalier, professor emeritus at Paris-Dauphine university and partner at the Cambridge Energy Research Associates, says that EDF is right that comparing costs between countries is hard.
But if the past in anything to go by, says Mr Chevalier, decommissioning costs for EDF are likely to be revised up. “What is clear is that we are underestimating the future cost of nuclear [decommissioning],” he adds.
Pierre Georges, analyst at Standard & Poor’s, says that for EDF the problem is that €23bn of provisions for decommissioning and waste storage is a large amount for a company that has big borrowings. Net debt stood at €37.4bn at the end of 2015.
“Given the size of these provisions, the already relatively high financial leverage, there is little headroom within [EDF’S] current ratings,” he says, adding that “any material change in the value of the provisions could have an immediate impact on the company’s credit quality”. EDF has an investment grade rating with S&P.
EDF faces several major investments. As well as the £18bn Hinkley Point project, EDF is involved in bailing out reactor designer Areva by buying a controlling stake in its reactor business for €2.5bn. It is also extending the life of France’s existing nuclear power stations until 2025, at a cost of €55bn.
And it is not just the decommissioning of the 58 reactors that is of concern. The estimated cost of storing radioactive waste — potentially for thousands of years — has been steadily rising.
EDF was given a shock in January when an analysis by Andra, the French authority responsible for managing nuclear waste, prompted the government to set the cost of the Cigéo national repository, a planned new disposal facility in north-eastern France, at €25bn.
This was €5bn more than EDF anticipated. The utility is charged with paying for the bulk of Cigéo’s construction.
Fabien Schilz, who is in charge of decommissioning at ASN, France’s nuclear safety regulator, says the disposal of radioactive waste is the “big concern” for him rather than the dismantling of the reactors.
“This is very complicated,” he adds. “We need to dismantle the old nuclear waste storage facilities and move it to a new facility, which is not even built yet.”
There are currently two nuclear disposal sites in France. The most dangerous radioactive material, stored at La Hague in northern France, is due to be moved and buried 500 metres underground at Cigéo.
The new disposal facility is scheduled to begin operations in 2025, but the project has been held up by a long legal process due to local opposition.
EDF says that the gap between its €23bn fund to cover decommissioning and waste storage and the estimated €54bn cost will be closed through the appreciating value of its investments.
The company also says that at the end of 2015, based on projected growth in the value of its €23bn fund, it should cover 99 per cent of the €54bn of costs.

>>> LSE and Deutsche Boerse working on common framework for clearing houses’ han

LSE and Deutsche Boerse working on common framework for clearing houses’ handling of bank defaults 

The London Stock Exchange Group [LON:LSE] and Deutsche Boerse [FRA:DB1] are working on a common framework for clearing houses’ handling of bank defaults, the Financial Times reported.

The newspaper cited two people familiar with the talks who said the LSE and Deutsche Boerse are looking in the long term for customers of the merged group to hold membership of the LSE’s LCH clearing house and its counterpart at Deutsche Boerse, Eurex.

The merged group would advise Eurex and LCH on the procedures for bank defaults, the item said. Banks are typical customers of the two clearing houses, according to the people cited by the newspaper.

Deutsche Boerse and the LSE are in talks with customers and regulators about their plans, one of the people said.

The framework for common procedures for bank defaults and risk management would be a key aspect of the proposed GBP 20bn (EUR 25.30bn) merger of the London Stock Exchange Group and Deutsche Boerse, the item said.

Deutsche Boerse and the LSE have committed to running Eurex and LCH separately, the item said.

The report appeared on page 20 of the UK print edition of the Financial Times on Wednesday, 20 April.


Financial Times

FT : Paulson’s funds plunge nearly $2bn after Allergan and Valeant bets

Paulson’s funds plunge nearly $2bn after Allergan and Valeant bets

John Paulson’s losing bets on Allergan and Valeant have contributed to a near $2bn fall in his funds’ assets in the space of five months, taking the total amount managed by his hedge fund business to its lowest level in almost 10 years.
Paulson & Co, one of the titans of the US hedge fund industry, made billions of dollars betting against subprime mortgages ahead of the financial crisis. Its Advantage Plus fund returned 17 per cent in 2010, following gains of 21.5 per cent in 2009, 37.6 per cent in 2008 and 158.5 per cent in 2007.

But fund documents show that the company’s assets under management had fallen to $14.3bn as of March 1, down from $16.1bn in November, and from a high of $36bn back in 2011.
These numbers are unlikely to have improved since March, given sharp falls in the price of Mr Paulson’s pharmaceuticals holdings.
His funds were down about $250m after a 17 per cent plunge in Allergan shares, his largest holding, on April 5 following news that tough tax rules from the Obama administration had scuppered a takeover bid from Pfizer.
At the same time, Valeant, once favoured by Wall Street, has suffered a series of share price falls following fears over is business model and ability to repay debt. Its shares are trading at about $32.60, having stood at $262.50 in August. Paulson was the sixth-biggest shareholder as of the end of December, according to regulatory filings.
Paulson & Co’s Advantage Plus fund is down 15 per cent this year and Mr Paulson is tapping his own fortune as additional collateral for his firm’s funds as a guarantee for its credit line, according to a person familiar with the returns.
He is faring worse than most event-driven and activist funds this year as well. Hedge Fund Research’s event-driven index advanced 2.7 per cent in the first quarter, while its activist index gained 3.1 per cent.
A spokesman for Paulson & Co declined to comment.
But Mr Paulson is not alone in his woes — 2016 has been a rocky year for hedge funds, with sharp losses incurred by marquee names. Many managers trimmed their bullish bets and added short positions as markets fell in the first six weeks, only to have those short positions hurt them when the market reversed course.
“Bad things happen when you’re the least prepared for them,” Alexandra Coupe, head of asset allocation research at Pacific Alternative Asset Management Company, said of this year’s turmoil.
Part of Mr Paulson’s current strategy is focusing on specialty pharmaceutical companies that may be takeover targets.
According to a presentation that Mr Paulson was giving on April 5, the day Allergan’s share price collapsed, he was telling an audience at his prime broker JPMorgan that the stock was the one “we are most excited about”.

>>> Inwit CEO says Cellnex bid better 'in theory'

Inwit CEO says Cellnex bid better 'in theory' 

Oscar Cicchetti, the CEO of Inwit, the listed Italian transmission company controlled by Telecom Italia, has said that a bid by Spanish rival Cellnex, is better “in theory,” Italian language daily La Stampa reported.

The report cited Cicchetti as saying that this was because the more towers owned by the bidder, the greater the synergies. However, Cicchetti added that in reality the best bid would depend contract conditions.

The item cited Cicchetti as noting that the TI board would decide on the winning bidder at its board of directors meeting on 5 May.

As previously reported a consortium made up of Cellnex and Italian infrastructure fund F2i is bidding for a 45% stake in Inwit, while listed Italian transmission tower network EI Towers is bidding for a stake just under 30%.

As previously reported, the Cellnex/F2i offer is priced at EUR 4.9 a share and the EI Towers offer at EUR 5 a share.

Inwit has a market cap of EUR 2.63bn.

Sourced from print copy: page 19


Source La Stampa