WSJ : Novo Nordisk Bets on Riskier Insulin Research

Novo Nordisk Bets on Riskier Insulin Research
The move would bring the Danish pharmaceutical company closer to the risky drug-discovery activities of the wider pharmaceutical industry


ENLARGE
A Novo Nordisk insulin production line in 2013. The world’s No. 1 insulin maker faces rising competition. PHOTO: FABIAN BIMMER/REUTERS
Nearly 10 years ago, executives at Novo Nordisk A/S wondered whether the company’s decadeslong quest to make ever-better insulin had finally come to an end.
The trigger was an impressive set of results for the company’s newest insulin that suggested the product would be difficult to improve upon.
“We just sat there and said, ‘Wow,’ ” research chief Mads Thomsenrecalled of the meeting where he and other executives saw the results. “We had kind of realized we were very close to perfection.”

That realization has forced a gear change at Novo Nordisk, the world’s largest insulin maker. For most of its history, the publicly held Danish company, which is valued at about 700 billion Danish kroner ($105 billion), relentlessly re-engineered the same basic medicine.
Now, it is getting into the complex and more expensive business of inventing new forms of insulin, bringing it closer to the riskier drug-discovery activities of the wider pharmaceutical industry.
In Novo Nordisk’s favor is the sheer scale of the diabetes epidemic, which affects one in 11 adults world-wide and is rising. At the same time, it is grappling with increasingly intense competition—its biggest rival in the insulin market is France’s Sanofi SA—and consumers who are less willing or cannot afford to pay premium prices for incremental improvements.
That tougher environment is reflected in Novo Nordisk’s approach to launching its latest insulin, Tresiba, in the U.S.
ENLARGE


Its list price, at $443.85 for 15ml, according to Truven Health Analytics, is 10% higher than the equivalent volume of its predecessor Levemir. That is low by historic standards: Levemir sold at a 43% premium to its predecessor when it launched 10 years ago, according to Jakob Riis,who runs Novo’s North American operations.
Health plans and employers typically pay a discount to the list price.

Last week, the company announced it would cut about 1,000 jobs from its 42,300-strong workforce to reduce costs. The move underscores Novo Nordisk’s struggle to maintain strong growth amid the competition in the insulin market, which accounts for more than half its sales.
It wasn’t immediately clear what impact the layoffs would have on the company’s new direction.
Novo Nordisk’s research costs are low compared with its peers, according to Dr. Thomsen. He said the company spent about $2 billion on research for each successful drug, compared with $5 billion to $10 billion for most pharmaceutical companies.
Insulin, a hormone produced by the pancreas, converts sugar to a form that can be stored for future use. People with Type-1 diabetes can’t produce insulin; those with Type-2 diabetes don’t produce enough.
Novo and Nordisk, which merged in 1989, were established shortly after the early-1920s discovery of insulin to extract and purify the substance from the pancreases of pigs.
Until recently, most of the company’s research sought to produce a fast-acting insulin that could be injected as a booster at mealtimes and another “basal” variety that would provide a slow, steady supply the rest of the time.
Patients spent an average of $736 a year on insulin in 2013, up from $231 in 2002, according to a recent analysis published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, though the costs can add up to thousands of dollars annually for those on high-deductible health plans.
Novo Nordisk believes it has reached the pinnacle of these efforts with Tresiba, which remains at a near-stable level in the blood for 40 hours, longer than the 24 hours offered by the previous generation.
Now, the company has its sights on new categories of insulin. Among them: one that selectively acts on the liver; one that can be taken as a tablet, not injected; and one that acts only when blood sugar is too high, eliminating the risk of dangerous dips in blood sugar that occur when there is too much insulin in the blood.
“Some of this is really complicated chemistry,” said Thomas Høeg-Jensen, a scientific director at Novo Nordisk who helped to design Tresiba and now leads efforts on glucose-sensitive insulin.
A team of about four scientists spent three to four years developing Tresiba, he said. By contrast, about 10 scientists have been working on glucose-sensitive insulin for four years. He estimated it would take another two years for the scientists to produce a version that could advance into human testing.
“The next steps will take innovation to an even higher level,” Dr. Thomsen said. “But that comes at a very high cost of research and development.”
The amount Novo Nordisk spends on diabetes R&D more than tripled in the last 10 years, to 10.5 billion Danish kroner ($1.6 billion) last year from 3.2 billion kroner in 2005.
Novo Nordisk’s push into more complex research has coincided with a resolve to stick with diabetes and closely related conditions such as obesity, rather than diversify into other disease areas.
The company’s near-exclusive focus on diabetes has helped to make it a top performer in terms of return on research dollars.
Novo Nordisk’s return on research investment, at 15%, is one of the highest in the industry, according to analysis by SSR LLC. By comparison, Novartis AG and GlaxoSmithKline PLC’s returns were 7% and 3% respectively.
Now that the company is venturing into more difficult territory, that narrow focus will be put to the test.
“The convenient explanation for [Novo’s high productivity] is that they just stuck to their knitting,” said Richard Evans, an analyst at SSR. But another is that the “degree of risk-taking in R&D was limited.”
Dr. Thomsen said Novo Nordisk’s research productivity is likely to decline as the company invests in projects that are more prone to fail. But he said Novo Nordisk can afford to take those risks because of the revenue-generating potential of its portfolio, including a treatment called Victoza that increases insulin secretion by the pancreas in Type-2 diabetes patients.
Novo Nordisk also faces competition from companies not historically linked with insulin. Merck & Co. is leading the race to develop glucose-sensitive insulin, having just completed a safety study in humans.
“We are a stubborn company that does make decisions that seem risky to some,” Dr. Thomsen said. “But with the competence of the company, it seems logical to us.”

WSJ : Novo Nordisk Bets on Riskier Insulin Research

Novo Nordisk Bets on Riskier Insulin Research
The move would bring the Danish pharmaceutical company closer to the risky drug-discovery activities of the wider pharmaceutical industry

Nearly 10 years ago, executives at Novo Nordisk A/S wondered whether the company’s decadeslong quest to make ever-better insulin had finally come to an end.

The trigger was an impressive set of results for the company’s newest insulin that suggested the product would be difficult to improve upon.

“We just sat there and said, ‘Wow,’ ” research chief Mads Thomsen recalled of the meeting where he and other executives saw the results. “We had kind of realized we were very close to perfection.”


That realization has forced a gear change at Novo Nordisk, the world’s largest insulin maker. For most of its history, the publicly held Danish company, which is valued at about 700 billion Danish kroner ($105 billion), relentlessly re-engineered the same basic medicine.

Now, it is getting into the complex and more expensive business of inventing new forms of insulin, bringing it closer to the riskier drug-discovery activities of the wider pharmaceutical industry.

In Novo Nordisk’s favor is the sheer scale of the diabetes epidemic, which affects one in 11 adults world-wide and is rising. At the same time, it is grappling with increasingly intense competition—its biggest rival in the insulin market is France’s Sanofi SA—and consumers who are less willing or cannot afford to pay premium prices for incremental improvements.

That tougher environment is reflected in Novo Nordisk’s approach to launching its latest insulin, Tresiba, in the U.S.


Its list price, at $443.85 for 15ml, according to Truven Health Analytics, is 10% higher than the equivalent volume of its predecessor Levemir. That is low by historic standards: Levemir sold at a 43% premium to its predecessor when it launched 10 years ago, according to Jakob Riis, who runs Novo’s North American operations.

Health plans and employers typically pay a discount to the list price.

La Tribune : "Safran n'a pas d'acquisition en vue pour l'instant" (Philippe Peti

Après la vente de la branche sécurité de Safran (Safran I&S), le directeur général du groupe aéronautique et de défense Philippe Petitcolin se confie sur la stratégie du groupe. Programmes civils (moteurs LEAP, CFM-56, Silvercrest) et militaires (Rafale, A400M, Patroller...)


LA TRIBUNE - Quel a été l'élément décisif pour le choix de l'acquéreur de Safran Identity & Security ?
PHILIPPE PETITCOLIN - Nous avons regardé quel était le meilleur projet pour l'avenir de cette activité, tous critères confondus. Et nous avons choisi le projet industriel proposé par Advent qui consiste à rapprocher nos activités de Sécurité de leur société française Oberthur Technologies pour créer un champion mondial des technologies de l'identification, avec une forte implantation en France, des investissements en R&D importants et les meilleures capacités de production.
Pourquoi finalement avoir vendu cette activité ?
Nous avons analysé quelle serait la meilleure option pour développer ces activités et sécuriser l'avenir des personnels, sachant que sa croissance se situe dans le monde du numérique. Dans ce monde numérique, il y a beaucoup à faire dans la sécurité et donc beaucoup d'opportunités. Mais c'est un monde que nous ne connaissons absolument pas chez Safran : nous ne travaillons pas avec les GAFA et n'avons pas l'expertise pour pouvoir attaquer efficacement ces marchés. Nous avons préféré vendre à celui qui serait le plus à même de se développer sur ce marché. Un marché d'ailleurs plus risqué, avec des nouveaux entrants qui arrivent de manière régulière et qui sont par nature déjà plus à l'aise dans ce domaine.
Après cette vente, quelles sont aujourd'hui vos priorités ?
C'est la croissance organique. En 2016, nous allons investir environ 450 millions d'euros en Recherche et Technologies (R&T), pour préparer l'avenir. Cela veut dire trouver des produits comme notre offre green taxiing, améliorer de nouveaux design, travailler sur de nouveaux matériaux, mettre en place de nouveaux process (3D printing), travailler sur le big data. Notre objectif stratégique numéro un n'est pas de chercher à l'extérieur un produit ou une activité que l'on n'a pas en interne, mais d'utiliser l'ensemble de nos talents pour nous développer de façon organique.
Avez-vous néanmoins des acquisitions en vue ?
Pas pour l'instant. Le jour où il y aura des opportunités, nous les étudierons avec beaucoup d'attention. Quels seront nos critères ? Il devra s'agir d'un fournisseur de rang 1, présent dans la haute technologie avec une activité services développée. Enfin, le prix devra être compétitif. Mais faire de la fusion-acquisition n'est pas la priorité.
Quel sera la taille de Safran dans deux, trois ans?
Tout dépendra si notre croissance reste purement organique ou si elle est accompagnée de croissance externe. Dans sa taille actuelle, Safran va continuer à croître au rythme des autres sociétés du secteur. Peut-être un peu mieux, mais on ne fera pas le double ou le triple des autres tous les ans. Si en revanche nous avons la possibilité de réaliser de la croissance externe, le chiffre d'affaires, la taille, le profil du groupe en seront modifiés. Mais je ne vais pas me fixer un objectif de fusion-acquisition, ce serait aller à l'encontre même de ce que doit être une société industrielle. Nous ne sommes ni un fonds, ni une société financière, mais bien une entreprise industrielle.
Donc pas d'OPA hostile ?
Ce n'est pas dans nos gênes de déclencher une OPA hostile. Sauf si nous trouvons une cible qui est vraiment essentielle et nécessaire à notre développement. Ce n'est pas le cas aujourd'hui. L'OPA hostile fait partie des outils pour arriver à cette croissance, mais nous ne sommes pas dans cet esprit aujourd'hui.
Un retournement de cycle d'ici à la fin de la décennie est régulièrement évoqué par les experts et certains professionnels du secteur. Y a-t-il, selon vous, un risque d'un ralentissement des commandes d'avions au cours des prochaines années ?
Nous sommes très confiants dans le domaine des court et moyen-courriers de type A320 ou Boeing 737. La demande pour cette catégorie d'avions est très forte, non seulement pour les versions remotorisées (A320NEO et 737 MAX) équipées de notre moteur LEAP, que pour les versions classiques de ces deux appareils sur lesquels nous sommes fortement présents avec le moteur CFM-56. A tel point que la baisse de la production du CFM-56 (construit par CFM International, notre coentreprise à 50-50 entre Safran et General Electric) au cours des prochaines années sera moins forte que prévue. On table en effet sur une centaine de moteurs supplémentaires en 2017 et 2018. La situation est, en revanche, différente pour les avions long-courriers car on ressent moins cet appétit des compagnies aériennes pour les appareils de génération actuelle dans les années qui viennent.
Vous êtes assis sur un tas d'or dans le domaine des services avec la croissance continue de votre parc de moteurs ?
Je ne vois pas le tas d'or ! Mais oui, nous connaissons une croissance de notre activité services, en particulier dans la propulsion mais aussi dans les équipements, et à un degré moindre dans la défense. C'est le signe d'une offre, y compris technologique, appréciée par nos clients, qui nous permet d'investir dans la recherche et dans les technologies pour développer nos futurs produits.
Malgré le succès des versions remotorisées, l'A320 et le 737 classiques équipés de moteurs CFM-56, la transition entre la production du moteur CFM-56 et celle du LEAP va-t-elle donc prendre plus de temps ?
Pas nécessairement. Cela signifie seulement que le biseau sera un petit peu différent puisque la montée en cadence du LEAP se poursuivra conformément à nos prévisions et que celle du CFM-56 baissera moins vite que prévu.
Les marges sur les dernières commandes CFM-56 doivent être assez faibles, non ?
Détrompez-vous. Contrairement à ce que nous pensions quand nous avons lancé le programme LEAP en 2008, il n'est pas difficile de vendre les derniers moteurs de la génération actuelle. Notre part de marché sur l'A320 classique (CEO) par exemple en témoigne. Depuis le début de l'année, nous avons obtenu quasiment 800 commandes de CFM-56 et notre part de marché cumulée s'élève à 82%. J'ai pris l'exemple de l'A320 car, contrairement au programme 737, nous n'avons pas l'exclusivité du moteur sur ce programme.
Airbus souhaiterait toujours monter en cadence sur l'A320NEO au-delà de 60 avions par mois prévus d'ici à mi 2019. Le LEAP pourrait-il suivre le rythme ?
A ce jour en tout cas, nous ne pouvons pas nous engager sur une cadence de production supérieure, tant chez Boeing que chez Airbus. Il serait irresponsable de vouloir essayer de faire plus aujourd'hui. Nos engagements sont extrêmement sérieux et nous n'irons pas au-delà au cours des trois prochaines années. Nous devons livrer une centaine de moteurs LEAP cette année, 500 l'année prochaine et 1 200 en 2018. En revanche, dans trois ans ou quatre ans, on verra. Si la montée en cadence se passe très bien jusque-là et si la demande est au rendez-vous, on sera prêt à discuter d'une hausse de la production. Mais pas avant.
La montée en cadence de la production du LEAP est-elle à l'abri d'une défaillance de certains sous-traitants?
La solidité de la chaîne des fournisseurs (supply chain) est évidemment un élément clé dans le respect de nos engagements de livraisons. Aussi avons-nous cherché à « dérisquer » la supply chain afin d'éviter une défaillance d'un fournisseur et, si cela arrivait, d'en minimiser au maximum l'impact. C'est pourquoi nous avons sélectionné de préférence des fournisseurs déjà présents sur le programme CFM-56. Cela nous permet d'avoir des entreprises qui connaissent notre façon de travailler et qui savent produire en quantité, puisqu'elles le font déjà aujourd'hui sur le CFM-56. 80% des fournisseurs du LEAP sont déjà des fournisseurs du CFM-56. Nous avons par ailleurs « double-sourcé » la fabrication de toutes les pièces du moteur. Nous pouvons donc compter potentiellement sur deux fournisseurs pour réaliser ces pièces.
Certains investisseurs s'inquiètent d'une inflation des coûts pour mener à bien cette transition ?
Mon travail, c'est simplement de faire ce que nous avons promis de faire. Lors de la Journée Investisseurs en mars, nous avons présenté des courbes d'évolution des coûts de production du moteur LEAP sur lesquelles nous nous sommes engagés. Nous nous y tenons. Les baisses de nos coûts de production sont aujourd'hui liées à la fois à la courbe d'apprentissage et à la montée en cadence de ces programmes.
Le moteur LEAP est en exploitation depuis juillet sur un A320 NEO. Comment se passe la mise ne service ?
Très, très bien. Pegasus, la compagnie de lancement de l'A320 NEO avec des moteurs LEAP (Pratt & Whitney est le second motoriste présent sur l'A320 remotorisé, NDLR), est très satisfaite des performances du moteur. Son président a récemment déclaré que la performance de ses avions NEO était parfaitement en ligne avec celle qu'on lui avait vendue. Il sait de quoi il parle. Pegasus dispose dans sa flotte d'A320 CEO et peut donc vraiment comparer les performances de la version remotorisée de l'A320 avec la version classique. La performance promise aux clients est au rendez-vous. L'A320 NEO vole exactement sur les mêmes cadences que celles du CEO. Au bout de 23 jours, le premier A320NEO équipé de moteurs LEAP avait effectué 196 vols, soit 8,52 vols en moyenne par jour, ce qui représente 7h30 de vol par jour. Il faut néanmoins rester humble. Ce n'est que le démarrage, seuls quelques avions équipés de moteurs LEAP sont en exploitation.
Êtes-vous confiant sur la capacité à livrer la centaine de moteurs LEAP prévue en 2016?
A ce jour, nous sommes en ligne. Mais je le répète, la montée en cadence reste un défi de tous les jours et ça le sera pendant les quatre ou cinq années qui viennent.
Avez-vous accordé à des compagnies aériennes disposant d'une entité industrielle dans la maintenance comme Air France Industrie ou Lufthansa Technik l'agrément d'autorisation pour assurer la maintenance du moteur LEAP?
Ce type d'accord se négocie compagnie par compagnie. Des discussions sont en cours. Ce sont des accords commerciaux et nous n'en parlons pas. Pour autant, nous souhaitons voir se développer, comme pour le CFM56, un réseau d'ateliers de compagnies aériennes ou indépendants pour la maintenance du moteur LEAP.
Bruxelles s'est penché sur les pratiques commerciales de certains motoristes et équipementiers aéronautiques concernant la maintenance.
Effectivement, la Commission européenne s'intéresse au secteur, et n'a pas ouvert d'enquête formelle à ce jour.
La Chine a décidé de créer un motoriste pour ses avions moyen-courriers. Est-ce un danger pour CFM International ?
Cela devait arriver. A partir du moment où le gouvernement chinois a décidé de créer une industrie aéronautique, il devait tôt ou tard se doter d'un outil lui permettant de développer et de fabriquer ses propres moteurs. Un pays qui possède une industrie aéronautique sans avoir son motoriste n'a pas une industrie complète. Une industrie aéronautique chinoise sans motoriste ne peut répondre aux besoins d'un pays comme la Chine, en particulier dans le domaine militaire. Aujourd'hui, la Chine achète principalement des moteurs militaires à la Russie. Cette dépendance ne peut tenir sur la durée. Une puissance comme la Chine ne peut en effet dépendre durablement d'une autre grande puissance pour faire voler ses avions militaires. En revanche, si nous savions que la Chine lancerait un jour son propre motoriste, nous ne savions pas si cette activité serait développée au sein d'AVIC, le groupe public chinois d'aéronautique et de défense, ou si une entité indépendante allait être créée. La Chine a choisi la seconde option. Nous coopèrerons avec cette nouvelle entité comme nous coopérons aujourd'hui avec AVIC, en respectant bien entendu l'ensemble des critères qui sont importants pour nous.

Pensez-vous que le motoriste chinois fera appel aux technologies occidentales ?
Ils feront appel à ce qu'ils souhaitent. Ensuite, les industriels verront ce qu'ils s'autorisent à discuter en termes de transferts de technologies et de coopération.
Le débat sur la motorisation des successeurs des avions court et moyen-courrier avec des open-rotor est-il toujours d'actualité avec l'amélioration attendue des moteurs à architecture classique ?
Pour répondre à cette question, il faut faire un peu d'histoire. En 2008, quand nous avons lancé un programme de recherches sur l'open-rotor, personne ne parlait de remotorisation de la famille A320 ou 737, mais du lancement vers 2012 d'un nouvel avion, doté de nouvelles technologies et de nouveaux moteurs. Avec le lancement en 2010 et 2011 des versions remotorisées de l'A320 et du 737 (qui ne devaient initialement durer que 10 ans), le calendrier de la mise en service de leur successeur a dérapé. Elle était plutôt prévue entre 2022 et 2027. Aujourd'hui, avec le succès des remotorisations introduites sur l'A320NEO et le 737MAX, Airbus et Boeing évoquent désormais 2030-2035. Nous avons donc beaucoup plus de temps pour travailler sur des projets alternatifs à l'open-rotor. Surtout que d'ici là, il y aura peut-être la mise en service d'un nouvel avion équipé d'un moteur à architecture traditionnelle, Boeing ayant annoncé qu'il réfléchissait à lancer un avion « middle-of-the-market » pour 2025. C'est aujourd'hui la priorité des motoristes.
Si Boeing lance son Middle-of-the-Market, un avion de la taille du B757 sur le segment du 200-300 sièges, Safran sera-t-il sur les rangs pour la motorisation?
Oui, si Boeing devait lancer cet avion, nous serions candidats pour gagner ce marché dans le cadre de CFM International. Aujourd'hui, au regard de la taille de l'avion, la vision que nous nous faisons de ce programme nécessiterait une poussée du moteur de 35 à 40.000 Livres. Soit un niveau qui se situe dans le champ de compétence de CFM International, qui s'étend de 18.000 à 50.000 livres de poussée. Ce serait donc un programme à parité entre GE et nous. C'est un point extrêmement important. Concernant, l'architecture du moteur, je pense que celle du LEAP serait sûrement l'une des plus appropriées pour ce projet d'avion.
Comment voyez-vous Safran dans 10 ans ?
Comme un des plus grands groupes d'aéronautique et de défense dans le monde. Nous y travaillons. Nous n'avons pas l'intention de nous recroqueviller sur nous-mêmes. Nous sommes en train de repositionner nos forces et de nous concentrer sur l'aéronautique et la défense. C'est là que nous réalisons aujourd'hui 90% de notre chiffre d'affaires, là que nous devons concentrer nos efforts et là où se situent nos challenges de demain.
Y compris dans la défense ?
La défense reste dans le groupe. Il n'est pas dans mes intentions de changer cela, bien au contraire. Et je suis très content de ce que nous faisons dans l'optronique, qui se développe bien. Le seul bémol dans la défense, c'est la rentabilité financière qui n'est pas au niveau espéré. Nous dépensons proportionnellement beaucoup plus en R&D que nos principaux concurrents américains en particulier, qui ont une base domestique beaucoup plus large. Ce qui leur permet d'amortir leurs coûts plus facilement.
Et le programme de drone Patroller est-il maîtrisé ?
Le Patroller est suivi comme un programme majeur. J'ai une réunion une fois par mois où on me présente l'état d'avancement du programme. Nous sommes dans la phase la plus facile, la phase papier. Je ne veux surtout pas que nous prenions de retard pour les phases d'industrialisation et de production.
Vos relations avec Dassault sont -elles apaisées après le décollage raté du Silvercrest ?
Le programme Silvercrest est remis si l'on peut dire sur les rails. C'est un programme qui a eu les problèmes que vous connaissez. Nous avons réaligné le développement en 3 phases : d'abord une phase de compréhension et de recherche de solutions, une deuxième phase pour la vérification de nos solutions et, enfin, une phase de validation. On entre dans la troisième phase. Nous allons faire tourner un moteur complet avant la fin de cette année. Il sera ensuite monté sur le banc volant, puis sur le Falcon 5X en 2017. Nous espérons une certification moteur début 2018.
Que représente le contrat Rafale en Inde ?
Je ne peux évidemment que nous féliciter de ce nouveau contrat pour le Rafale de Dassault Aviation. Safran fournit les moteurs et de nombreux équipements tels que les trains d'atterrissage, le câblage, les roues et freins carbone ou encore les systèmes de navigation. Outre une vraie reconnaissance des technologies de Safran et de ses partenaires, ce nouveau contrat consolide notre activité et nos emplois sur le segment de l'aviation militaire.
Préparez-vous une augmentation de la poussée du moteur Rafale, le M88 ?
J'aimerais bien. Je pense que parmi les sujets de fond, nous allons être amenés à regarder dans les années à venir l'augmentation de la poussée du M88. Comme le Rafale a grossi et devient plus lourd, il ne me parait pas inconcevable qu'on demande au motoriste un peu plus de poussée. Nos bureaux d'études sont prêts à travailler.
Pourrait-il passer à 9 tonnes ?
Il y a plusieurs étapes, qui ont des coûts et des durées de mise en œuvre différents. On peut déjà travailler sur une étape intermédiaire à un peu plus de 8 tonnes de poussée (contre 7,5 tonnes aujourd'hui, ndlr). On peut atteindre 8 tonnes avec des modifications non structurales. Mais je ne suis pas sûr que cela puisse se concrétiser rapidement en raison des coûts associés.
Avez-vous commencé les modernisations du moteur A400M ?
Oui et nous sommes en ligne avec le plan que nous avions défini avant l'été. Les boites de transmission de puissance (Propeller Gear Box ou PGB) sont livrées aujourd'hui avec une solution intermédiaire (pignon raccourci). Les motoristes travaillent sur une solution définitive qui sera prête en 2017.
Que vous inspire le dossier Alstom ?
Il ne peut y avoir de réponse simple. On ne peut pas à la fois vouloir une concurrence très ouverte et, en même temps, protéger les usines de son pays et, donc, donner un avantage qui ne serait pas dû aux entreprises nationales. Faut-il appliquer les règles de concurrence établies au niveau européen à des sites qui sont quasiment dépendants de la commande publique ? C'est aux politiques d'y répondre. Tout comme résoudre ce paradoxe : être performants à l'exportation tout en étant contre les contrats gagnés par les étrangers en France.
Mais le groupe Safran vit de la commande publique...
Dans les moteurs civils, Safran ne dépend pas de la commande publique. Et si nous perdions le moteur du Rafale, cela ne remettrait pas en cause nos sites de production. C'est vrai que nous aurions plus de difficultés sur des sites d'optronique ou dans la défense, qui dépendent quasiment des commandes de l'Etat. Safran a toutefois pu développer une activité à l'export. Nous avons une seule usine qui dépend beaucoup de la commande publique, c'est celle de Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray qui fabrique des radars routiers.
En même temps, Safran a des projets d'ouverture de sites en France.
Safran va ouvrir avec Air France Industries une usine de réparation de pièces de moteurs dans le Nord de la France. En tant que société qui affronte la concurrence internationale, chaque fois que nous aurons besoin de créer un site, s'il fait sens au niveau compétitivité de le créer en France, nous le ferons avec plaisir. Je n'ai pas d'a priori. Si en revanche, pour des raisons de compétitivité, il apparaît que lancer un site en France créerait un déficit de compétitivité irréversible, on ne le fera pas.
Estimez-vous comme Fabrice Brégier que les nouvelles technologies permettront de relocaliser en France certaines activités industrielles ?
Oui grâce notamment à l'impression 3D, qui est une autre façon de fabriquer les mêmes pièces. Le changement de process peut être une solution pour relocaliser des productions en France. La digitalisation et le big data sont, pour nous industriels, une source de compétitivité. Ils permettent de réduire la non-qualité grâce à tous les capteurs placés sur les machines. Nous avons accès à des milliers de données que nous utilisons pour améliorer la fabricabilité de nos pièces (ndlr, fabrication et traçabilité). En outre, les capteurs sur nos produits (moteurs, trains d'atterrissage etc...) nous permettent de faire de la maintenance et de la réparation prédictive de certains de nos produits. C'est un vrai avantage. Est-ce que cela peut rapatrier de l'emploi en France ? Peut-être.
Votre mandat s'achève en 2018, à un moment où la transition entre la fin de la production du CFM-56 et celle du LEAP ne sera pas achevée. Seriez-vous prêt à demander un changement de statuts pour relever la limite d'âge pour pouvoir être reconduit ?
2018, c'est loin !

(Kepler-Cheuvreux) Safran : Solid execution of Morpho disposal

Solid execution of Morpho disposal
Safran announced yesterday it had entered into exclusive negotiations to
sell its security business to Advent (owner of Oberthur) for a total
valuation of EUR2.425bn. 

The deal is a positive in three ways.
Security business sold at solid valuation levels
The EUR2.425bn deal valuation is a positive surprise, for an entity having
generated EUR1.6bn of sales in 2015 and an EBIT margin estimated in the
range of 7%. This leads to EV/ EBIT transaction multiples above 15x. Such
traction and interest confirm the solid prospects ahead for the division and
the validity of the business plan laid out by Safran management. Combined
with the sale of detection (USD710m upcoming proceeds), Safran managed
to sell its security business for close to EUR3bn, while our approach to the
divisional valuation in our SOP was more in the range of EUR2.2-2.3bn.
Strategic review executed in a disciplined manner
It took Safran less than a year to complete the strategic review of the
security division and identify the right buyers for the respective entities. In
our view, this was a disciplined, but rather well-executed review, limiting
the related uncertainty. In comparison, the L-1 acquisition announced in
September 2010 and closed in July 2011 turned out to be a rather lengthy
process, creating an unwelcome distraction for the company.
Some time to consider use of cash proceeds
The deal announced yesterday will close in 2017, as time is needed to gain
the regulatory approvals. Together with the detection deal set to close in
early 2017, Safran will receive its EUR3bn cash proceeds at some point in
2017. This gives it time to review its cash utilisation and review/ identify all
different options at hands. At this stage, we do not thinkthat the sale of the
security means Safran is compelled to acquire a company in aircraft
equipment. In any case, the timely disposal of the security division proves
that Safran management will apply strict discipline in reviewing its options
to use the cash proceeds.
Safran remains preferred engine maker in Europe
The valuation upside derived from the deal combined with an apparently
smooth entry into service of the Leap engine are all positive for the
company. We will keep a close eye on how the company ramps up
production on the Leap and how costs are controlled. For now, however,
the company may benefit from larger-than-expected CFM56 sales in 2016
and 2017, partly offsetting the Leap ramp-up costs.

(HSBC) Orange - Downgrade to Hold : Sound strategy but lacking positive triggers

* France: competition in both fixed and mobile remains tough, limiting pricing power despite high capex
* Orange is defending market share effectively, but pressure from competitors caps earnings surprise in the short term
* Downgrade to Hold from Buy on lack of catalysts; target price unchanged at EUR15.5

* Downgrade to Hold on lack of triggers, TP EUR15.5 unchanged
Orange trades at 5.3x 2016e EV/EBITDA, a 20% discount to peers, and close to a 17% discount to its 10-year average. But a lack of short to medium-term catalysts leads us to downgrade it to Hold from Buy. We prefer Deutsche Telekom (Buy,
TP EUR18, CMP EUR15) as an alternative exposure to a European large cap incumbent. We see more upside from pricing power in the German market and a stronger pro-forma EBITDA growth (2016e-18e CAGR of 7.7% vs 2.1% at Orange)
driven by the US.

>>> Street Pre-Market Indications

MAINFIRST
*AIRBUS-Sticking to plane delivery targets - COO Le Monde...........+0.5%
*DBK-No deal with DOJ yet,DOJ continsw to discuss outcome-WSJ.......Closed
*EVONIK-Eyeing possible divestments of Dow/DuPont says CEO..........Closed
*TELEFONICA-02 plans to sell shares to Retail Investors-CEO.........+1%
*PHILIPS-Said to be in talks to sell Lumileds ro Apollo($2.8b)......+1%
*ABB-Cevian denies report it met buyers for ABB Assets - SamS......-0.5%
*MAERSK-Open to acq's if right opp comes up (Hanjin / Hyundai ?)....+0.5%
*CARREFOUR-Brazil Unit said to seek up to BRL10b in IPO-Globo.......+0.5%
*NOVARTIS-Cosentyx Skin Clearance maintained for 4 Years............+0.5%
*ING-Plans to cut 5,800 jobs,will take €1 PT Provision in Q4........U/C
*TEMENOS-Major European bank selects co's UniversalSuite............+1%
07:20:14 Opera Software Says CFIUS Regulatory Review Still Ongoing NSN OEGJUO6JIJUP <GO>

CS
Abb M/P Cevian denies report it met buyers for ABB's Power Grid biz
Airbus M/P Sticking to its target to deliver 650 planes this year
Anglos +1% Apollo in Exclusive Talks to Buy Anglo American Coal Assets
Asset Manage +1-2% Hendersons and Janus to merge-an all-stock merger of equals
Autoliv +1-2% Takata received offers of $1-2bn, Autoliv not one of them
BAE Systems +1% Gets GBP 1.3bln to start building new nuclear submarines
Banks -1% DB talks with the U.S. Justice Department are continuing
BP -1% Clair Platform Oil Leak Stopped, Under Investigation
Miners +0.5% Copper -0.40%, Brent +0.25%, Iron Ore closed, China closed
Nordea +1-2% Says FSA sees CET1 ratio requirement at 17.3%
Nyrstar -3-5% Zinc metal guidance at lower end
Philips +1% Said to be in talks to sell Lumileds unit to Apollo Global
Temenos +3% Says major European bank has selected Universalsuite

BofAML EMEA
SVG CAPITAL - Goldman, CPPIB said in talks to bid for SVG Cap Assets (685)...+1%
SHB - Lower than expected SREP increase supportive of capital position (119).+1%
SANOFI - +ve as conf reassures on potential for key product Dupixent (68)..+0.5%
BOWLEVEN - Receives $15m cash proceeds from Etinde Farm-Out transaction (25p)u/c
MINERS - Copper -0.2%, Iron Ore -0.75 with BHP OZ +1.6% and RIO OZ +0.5%.....u/c
ANGLOS - Receives cash proceeds of $1.7b for completed sale of Niobium (968).u/c
NORDEA - Capital req post prelim SREP & PD investigation inline with exp (85)u/c
ERICSSON - Article in DI regarding potential new candidates for CEO job (62).u/c
BT - Sentiment -ve. BT & Ofcom reach impasse over independent Openreach (385)-1%

Barron's: Liberty Media: Better Than Berkshire

Liberty Media: Better Than Berkshire
Led by cable mogul John Malone and CEO Greg Maffei, the nine stocks under the Liberty Media umbrella have delivered, in the aggregate, an annualized 13% over the past decade, compared with 7.5% for Bufftet’s Berkshire Hathaway and 7.7% for the S&P 500.

Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei, above, and Chairman John Malone are masters at creating value for shareholders. Photo: Chris Goodney/Bloomberg

Few people have made more money for investors over the past three decades than John Malone. The billionaire cable-TV investor and operator parlayed a small group of cable systems, originally assembled in the 1970s, into Tele-Communications Inc., before selling it to AT&T in 1999 for $48 billion.
Starting over with a handful of former TCI assets, Malone has, through an often mind-bending series of financial maneuvers, built another cable and media empire, Liberty Media. And together with Greg Maffei, Liberty’s CEO since 2005, he’s still building.
Investors have been well rewarded along the way. Over the past decade, Malone’s investment returns have bested those of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (ticker: BRKA). A holder of the original Liberty Media in 2004, before it split its U.S. and international assets into separate companies, would have realized annualized returns of 13%, compared with 7.5% for Berkshire and 7.7% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 index, according to Christopher Marangi, co-chief investment officer of the value group at Mario Gabelli’s Gamco Investors.



Even after these outsize returns, there is still plenty of room for growth. Liberty’s myriad businesses and assets (see table above) are housed under five main corporate umbrellas—Liberty Media, Liberty Broadband (LBRDK), Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings (LTRPA), Liberty Interactive, and Liberty Global. Within that group of five are nine stocks, including seven tracking stocks. The complex structure can make it challenging for investors, but those who have taken the time to understand it have found it worthwhile.
Tracking stocks reflect the economics of the underlying business but don’t offer direct economic ownership. Liberty has long favored them, based on its view that investors prefer pure plays and will often assign a so-called conglomerate discount to multi-asset or multibusiness enterprises. Trackers remain controversial, with detractors citing the lack of direct ownership as a drawback.
Looking at the nine stocks, Liberty Interactive offers an appealing play on the out-of-favor QVC home-shopping unit. Depressed Liberty Global tracks an improving group of European cable-TV businesses and could become an acquisition target for London-based wireless giant Vodafone Group (VOD).
Liberty SiriusXM (LSXMA), Liberty Broadband, and Liberty TripAdvisor offer a good way to invest in satellite-radio behemoth Sirius XM Holdings (SIRI), No. 2 U.S. cable operatorCharter Communications (CHTR), and online hotel and vacation review site TripAdvisor (TRIP), respectively. These three Liberty stocks either track an equity stake or directly hold an equity interest in the three companies. Barron’s wrote favorably earlier this yearon one of the smaller Liberty entities, Liberty Braves (BATRK), which tracks Liberty’s ownership of the Atlanta Braves baseball team as well as a real-estate development near the team’s new stadium.
“The Malone magic formula starts with good businesses that are within his core competency, then putting the right management teams in place and leveraging those companies appropriately,” says Marangi. The Gabelli funds own a portfolio of Liberty companies. “One of our golden rules for investing in media and cable is to be on the same side of the table as John Malone and to align our interests with his,” he says.
AT 75, MALONE REMAINS A GUIDING FORCE at Liberty—and remains famously averse to paying taxes. Liberty is known for shuffling assets through tax-efficient transactions including spinoffs, tracking stocks, and other financial maneuvers. Marangi counts seven Liberty spinoffs over its history as well as a half-dozen times when tracking stocks were issued. Among the spinoffs are Discovery Communications (DISCA) andStarz (STRZA). Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF) and Starz are set to merge later this year.
“No other executive in the U.S. has mastered the intricacies of the tax code to the same extent that Malone has,” says New York tax expert Robert Willens. “We are consistently in awe of the structures he and his advisors come up with to rearrange his extensive holdings, always without tax consequences, in the most advantageous way.”
In an interview with Barron’s last week, Greg Maffei, the CEO of Liberty’s U.S. businesses for more than a decade, said the Liberty mission is simple: “We’re trying to create value for shareholders.”
Maffei, 56, and Malone see the world similarly and operate a little like Buffett and his longtime Berkshire partner, Charlie Munger. The Liberty duo focuses on strategy, acquisitions, and capital allocation, while leaving the day-to-day management of various Liberty companies to others. “We benefit from our ability to be long-term and often controlling shareholders, and from our experience and industry knowledge,” Maffei says.
But unlike Buffett, who famously has said the holding period for Berkshire businesses is “forever,” Malone and Maffei will sell if the price is right. They orchestrated a sale of DirecTV to AT&T (T) in 2015 in a well-timed deal. Over time, Liberty has excelled at capital allocation, favoring stock buybacks over dividends. This reflects in part Malone’s aversion to taxes. The low-profile Malone wasn’t available to talk to Barron’s.
Malone’s Liberty empire compises companies with a total market value of $80 billion. His personal stake in them is worth about $4 billion. Malone is chairman of four of the five Liberty companies; Liberty TripAdvisor is the exception. He has effective control of the companies through thinly traded super-voting shares (Class B stock), even though his economic interest is usually between 3% and 9% (see table). Maffei controls Liberty TripAdvisor through super-voting stock.



The Malone control structure may not be great corporate governance—super-voting stock disenfranchises noncontrolling holders—but few investors are complaining. Similar arrangements are in place at many family-controlled media companies, including CBS(CBS), Viacom (VIAB), New York Times (NYT), and News Corp (NWSA), the parent ofBarron’s.
The reason for many of the financial machinations, Maffei says, is to avoid taxes on long-held, highly appreciated assets. Liberty got some of its original media assets, including stakes in QVC and Discovery, because TCI wrested them as compensation for agreeing to carry the channels on its cable systems. Malone held on to those assets and others after TCI was acquired by AT&T.
Liberty generally has invested well, getting a 40% equity stake in Sirius XM Holdings, now worth $13 billion, during the 2008-09 financial crisis in return for a much-needed $530 million loan to the satellite-radio company. And Liberty bought 27% of Charter Communications from a group of institutional investors in 2013, and has seen the value of the stake nearly triple since then.
KEEPING TRACK of Liberty’s various companies and tracking stocks is confusing, not least because some of them have the same names.
For example, Liberty Media issued three trackers in April: Liberty SiriusXM; Liberty Braves, for the Atlanta Braves; and Liberty Media, whose main asset will be the Formula One auto-racing business.
Liberty Interactive has two trackers: Liberty Interactive, for QVC, and Liberty Ventures(LVNTA), whose main asset, a $3 billion stake in Liberty Broadband, was acquired through an equity investment in Charter to help fund its purchase earlier this year of Time Warner Cable. Liberty Ventures is in the process of splitting off a $2.7 billion interest inExpedia (EXPE), the online travel site.

John Malone, the storied chairman of Liberty Media, has built his empire via often mind-bending financial moves. Matthew Staver/Bloomberg
And Liberty Global has two trackers: Liberty Global (LBTYK), for the European cable-TV business, and Liberty Latin America & Caribbean Group (LILAK) for its cable and telecom operations in the region.
Here’s an overview for investors of the nine Liberty companies:
LIBERTY INTERACTIVE. After long viewing QVC as a differentiated retailer largely immune to the industry’s ills, Wall Street got worried after the company stated in its second-quarter earnings report that its U.S. business hit a wall in June. QVC shares promptly fell 30% to around $20, where they remain. Investors now fear Amazon.com(AMZN), cord-cutting, and an older customer base. “This company has been around for a long time. You’d think they’d get some credit for adapting to multiple platform changes in the past,” says Mario Cibelli, chief investment officer at Marathon Partners, a QVC holder. “QVC has shown a proclivity to reinvent itself.”
QVC now gets half of its U.S. sales from the Internet, with half of that from mobile. Its strategy is to emphasize regional and house brands while providing entertainment and fostering a sense of community among its shoppers. It has sizable and growing overseas operations in the U.K. and the rest of Europe. Last year it spent $2.4 billion to acquire zulily, a fast-growing online retailer catering to a younger customer base.
QVC’s valuation looks reasonable. It trades for less than 11 times its cash net income of $1.90 a share in the past 12 months. This calculation adjusts net income for noncash goodwill amortization. Bulls such as Gabelli’s Marangi see the stock getting back into the mid-to-high $20s.
LIBERTY GLOBAL has cable-TV operations in much of Western Europe, with 37% of its revenue in the U.K. and most of the rest in three countries: Germany, the Netherlands, and Belgium. Its shares are down 11% this year to $33 and off 30% from their high a year ago, reflecting some competitive challenges and high debt.
“The case for cable could be even stronger in Europe than in the U.S.,” says Marangi. He notes that cord-cutting is less of an issue there because European monthly pricing for cable/Internet-access is half that of the U.S., at about $50 a month.
A merger with Vodafone has been much discussed, though Vodafone announced a year ago that the companies were no longer in talks. While there may be antitrust obstacles to a combination, there would be a lot of benefits, given significant country overlap and the opportunity to offer consumers a bundle of fixed-line and wireless Internet services. UBS analyst Polo Tang has written of potential annual cost benefits of more than $2 billion. Marangi sees upside to $42.
LIBERTY SIRIUSXM. Sirius XM Holdings is an underappreciated story with an entrenched and growing satellite-radio subscriber base totaling 31 million. It has high margins, strong auto-maker relationships, and rising free cash flow that supports an ample stock-buyback program. Sirius shares, around $4.20, are up 30% in the past two years. The Liberty SiriusXM tracker looks appealing at a recent $34 because it trades at about a 13% discount to the value of Liberty’s now-65% stake in Sirius XM.
Maffei calls the discount “annoying” because Liberty Sirius offers a pure play on Sirius XM. One fear is that Liberty will make another attempt to buy Sirius XM at a premium—it tried and failed to do so at a price of around $3.70 in 2014. “We’ve publicly said we’d like to own 100%,” Maffei says. But he insists he won’t overpay. “We’ve been disciplined, and that’s unlikely to happen,” he says.
One bullish factor for the Liberty tracker is that Liberty’s percentage stake in Sirius continues to rise as Sirius buys back stock and could hit 75% or more by the end of 2018, according to Macquarie analyst Amy Yong. The stock could hit $40 if the discount narrows and Sirius appreciates.
LIBERTY MEDIA. Wall Street liked the company’s recent $8 billion deal to buy Formula One. That sent Liberty Media shares up 30% to $29, as the company, which will be renamed Formula One, shifts from an asset play to an operating story. The transaction is classic Malone: complex and leveraged, with benefits that include a low tax rate and modest capital requirements.
Maffei calls it a “great business” with “upside in sponsorship, broadcasting, and venue revenues,” plus a digital opportunity. The Formula One deal, however, wasn’t cheap, at 17 times trailing annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda. The recent run-up in Liberty shares captures some of the upside in Formula One. There are risks. Formula One’s Ebitda is little changed in recent years. Liberty Media now looks fully priced.
LIBERTY BRAVES. Sports franchises are trophy assets, and there are few public plays aside from Liberty Braves and Madison Square Garden (MSG), owner of the New York Knicks and Rangers. Liberty Braves shares trade around $17, giving the company a market value of about $850 million.
The Atlanta Braves were terrible on the field this season, and attendance at home games was weak. The upside could come next season, when the team moves to a new stadium. Based on revenue gains from other major sports teams that moved to new stadiums in the past decade, analysts estimate the Braves team revenue could rise to $325 million in 2017 from about $250 million this year, with pretax profit rising to $60 million from an estimated break even this year.

Looking out a few years, Liberty Braves could lose its tracker designation and become a hard asset, which would help its valuation, although sale prospects for the team look remote anytime soon due to potential tax liabilities. Maffei says sports teams often command four to five times annual revenue. If the Braves revenue hits $325 million, that could imply a valuation for the team of more than $1.5 billion, or $25-plus a share.
LIBERTY TRIPADVISOR. The shares, at around $22, trade close to the value of the company’s holding of 31 million TripAdvisor shares. Liberty TripAdvisor holds a 22% economic interest in the online travel-reviews site. The kicker is that its voting control is 57% through ownership of super-voting shares.
Liberty TripAdvisor holders could benefit from a merger with TripAdvisor if they receive a nice premium for their super-voting shares. A more lucrative scenario would be an outright purchase of TripAdvisor by the likes of Priceline Group (PCLN), Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon, or even Alibaba Group Holding (BABA). With a market value of $9 billion, TripAdvisor could easily be swallowed, although a deal with Alphabet or Priceline could raise antitrust issues.
LIBERTY BROADBAND, LIBERTY VENTURES. The advantage of holding Liberty Broadband, at $72, is that it trades at a 10% discount to the value of its 17% stake in Charter Communications. One bullish scenario, Gabelli’s Marangi says, is that Charter could buy Liberty Broadband for stock. After a 50% rally this year to $270, however, Charter itself is no longer a bargain. Maffei says the discount on Liberty Broadband shares may reflect fears about “taxes or complexity.” He adds that Liberty “historically” has been “pretty good at getting full value.”
While Liberty Broadband amounts to a near-100% play on Charter, Liberty Ventures, which holds stakes in Liberty Broadband and Charter Communications with a combined value of $4.5 billion, is a more diluted Charter play thanks to series of other investments, including stakes in Lending Tree (TREE), FTD (FTD) and Interval Leisure Group (IILG). In a client note, FBN Securities analyst Robert Routh called Liberty Ventures “the most complex” of the Liberty companies due in part to “complex tax benefits that few understand.” The benefit to owning Liberty Ventures is that, at around $40, it recently traded at an estimated 15% discount to its net asset value. Ultimately, Routh wrote, Liberty Ventures could be combined with Liberty Broadband, benefiting Ventures investors.
LIBERTY LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN. The $7.4 billion purchase in May of Cable & Wireless Communications has turned the company into a leader in cable TV, broadband, and telecom in the region. Macquarie’s Yong wrote recently that few businesses offer a “consumer wireline/wireless product across 20 countries and [a] 30-countrywide fiberoptic network.” The Cable & Wireless deal triples its revenue.
Yong carries a price target of $36, compared with a recent price of $29, based on her expectation that the company can trade at 7.25 times estimated 2018 Ebitda

>>> What to look at today - 3rd of October 2016

China official PMIs out over the weekend show continued improvement, with manufacturing in expansion for the 2nd straight month and services edging higher following last month's drop. China mainland markets are closed for the Golden Week holiday, though focus will fall on the property developers after regulators announced some fresh housing curbs - Chengdu and Zhengzhou banned people from buying a 3rd house, Beijing increased down-payments for first-time purchases to 35%. US financial press notes analysts speculate that OPEC production cut of 700K bpd is not large enough and will not happen quickly enough to address global supply glut; Oil prices fell about 0.5% in early electronic trade. After Friday's report that Deutsche is near a $5.4B settlement with US officials over mortgage bonds, a follow-up report on Sunday indicated that while DB is in continued talks with the DOJ, no deal has been presented to senior decision-makers for approvals by either side; Separately, German press reported top German corporates have voiced their support for DB and its integral importance in the economy.

Nikkei +0.88% Hang Seng +1.24% CSI closed Shanghai Closed

Eur$ 1.1231 CMH 6.676* CNY 6.6718 JPY 101.39 GBP 1.2933 CHF 0.9723 RUB $62.9019

S&P +0.03% EuroStoxx -0.15% Dax closed Ibex -0.05% SMI +0.25%

Macro :
- May Tells Sunday Times Brexit Legislation Coming in April or May
- Greek Banks Not at Risk From Turmoil in EU Banks: Stournaras
- China Factory Gauge Stable at Post-2014 High as Services Pick Up
- DAX Leaders Say Strong Deutsche Bank Vital for Germany: FAS
- Italy’s Padoan to Hold Meeting on Banks Tomorrow: Ansa
- ZEW’s Wambach Sees German Economic Boom at Risk From Complacency
- Colombians Reject Peace Accord in Stunning Defeat for Government

Keep an eye on :
- ABBN VX : Cevian Denies Report It Met Buyers for ABB Assets: SamS
- ABG SM : Abengoa 1H Net Loss EU3.7b on Bionergy, Brazil Charges
- AC FP : Kim Kardashian West Robbed At Gunpoint in Paris Hotel as Five Men Escape With Jewellery Worth Millions
- AIR FP : Airbus Sticking to Plane Delivery Targets, COO Tells Le Monde
- AZ IM : Alitalia Seen Posting About EU100m Quarterly Loss: Messaggero
- ALO FP : Alstom’s Belfort Plant Will Be Saved, French Prime Minister Says
- AMUN FP : Amundi, Poste Italiane Said Leading Bids for UniCredit’s Pioneer
- BT/ LN : BT Says Business Rate Increases May Push Up Phone Bills: Times
- CA FP : Carrefour Brazil Unit Said to Seek Up to BRL10b in IPO: Globo
- CU FP : Fosun’s Club Med to Build ‘Joyview’ Mid-Scale Resorts in China
- STZ US : Constellation Said to Consider $1b Sale of Canadian Wine: WSJ
- DBK GY : Deutsche Bank’s Woes Put $2 Trillion of Bonds Beyond ECB’s Reach
- DBK GY : Deutsche Bank to ‘Put Forward Defense in Court’ in Milan Probe
- DBK GY : Cryan Traveling to U.S. to Discuss Deutsche Bank Fine: FAZ
- DB1 GY : Euronext eyes EUR 400m bid for LSE LCH SA clearing house
- EDF FP : French State’s APE Says It Will Take EDF Dividend in Shares
- EI FP : Essilor Seeks EU400m-EU500m Internet Sales 2018: Echos
- RF FP : Eurazeo PME Invests EU54.9m in AssurCopro, Takes 50% Stake
- NXT FP : Euronext eyes EUR 400m bid for LSE LCH SA clearing house
- EVK GY : Evonik Eyeing Possible Divestments of Dow/DuPont, CEO Tells RP
- FB US : Facebook Testing Snapchat-Like ‘Stories’ Feature: Techcrunch
- GLPG NA : Galapagos Is ‘Definitely’ Considering Takeovers, CEO Tells FD
- GOOG US : Google to Reject EU Charges It Has a Monopoly, Telegraph Says
- KLM NA : China Airlines, KLM Plan to Intensify Collaboration: Telegraaf
- MAERSKB DC : Maersk Says Open to Acquisitions If Right Opportunity Comes Up
- NDA SS : Nordea Says FSA CET1 Ratio Requirement 17.3% by Sept. 30
- NOVN VX : Novartis Says Cosentyx Skin Clearance Maintained for 4 Years
- RI FP : Pernod Ricard Sells Frïs Vodka to Sazerac; No Terms
- PHIA NA : Philips Said to Be in Talks to Sell Lumileds to Apollo Global
- SAN FP : Regeneron/Sanofi Skin Drug Improved Itching, Added Data Show
- SIE GY : Siemens Overseers Urge Chairman to Hire More Executives: Spiegel
- TEF SM : O2 Plans to Sell Shrs to Retail Investors, CEO Tells Telegraph
- TSLA US : Tesla Delivers 24,500 Vehicles in 3Q
- TIT IM : Oi Restructuring Adviser PJT Partners to Give Up Role: Reuters
- TUI LN : TUIfly Labor Representatives Oppose Deal With Etihad: BamS
- TWTR US : Google Said to Tap Lazard to Review Potential Bid for Twitter
- UBI IM : ECB Forces UBI to Give Up Plan to Buy 3 Banks: Messaggero
- UBSG VX : UBS Picks 3 Trades for Asset Allocation From Bonds to Equities
- ZAL GY : Zalando Wants 5% of European Fashion Market: Boersen-Zeitung

>>> Asian Update

Asia Mid-Session Market Update: China PMI's show continued stabilization; Deutsche Bank in talks with DOJ, nothing definitive decided on settlement


***Asia Notes/Observations***
- China official PMIs out over the weekend show continued improvement, with manufacturing in expansion for the 2nd straight month and services edging higher following last month's drop. Key manufacturing components saw New Export Orders hit a 4-month high, New Orders in expansion for 7th straight month, Input Prices reaching a 5-month high, and Employment rising to its best level of the year. Some analysts suggest the stable PMIs could keep the PBoC on the sidelines as long as the bounce continues.
- China mainland markets are closed for the Golden Week holiday, though focus will fall on the property developers after regulators announced some fresh housing curbs - Chengdu and Zhengzhou banned people from buying a 3rd house, Beijing increased down-payments for first-time purchases to 35%.
- US financial press notes analysts speculate that OPEC production cut of 700K bpd is not large enough and will not happen quickly enough to address global supply glut; Oil prices fell about 0.5% in early electronic trade.
- After Friday's report that Deutsche is near a $5.4B settlement with US officials over mortgage bonds, a follow-up report on Sunday indicated that while DB is in continued talks with the DOJ, no deal has been presented to senior decision-makers for approvals by either side; Separately, German press reported top German corporates have voiced their support for DB and its integral importance in the economy.
- Tesla surprised with a Q3 preannouncement of sales and production - output was up 70% q/q at 24.5K (15.8K were Model S and 8.7K Model X) and company also maintained its H2 target of 50K deliveries; Q4 seen at or slightly above Q3, despite Q4 being a shorter quarter.

***Equity Futures (23:30ET): S&P e-mini +0.1%, Dax closed, FTSE100 +0.2%***

***FX / Commodities ranges (23:30ET):***
- EUR 1.1225-1.1245; JPY 101.20-101.60; AUD 0.7640-0.7665, NZD 0.7255-0.7285
- Gold +0.1% at 1,319/oz; Oil -0.5% at $48.02/brl; Copper flat at $2.21/lb
- GLD: SPDR Gold Trust ETF daily holdings fall 1.1 tonnes to 948.0 tonnes; 2nd straight decline
- SLV: iShares Silver Trust ETF daily holdings fall to 11,270 tonnes from 11,287 tonnes prior; 2nd straight decline

***Asian Equity Markets (23:30ET)***
- Nikkei +1.1%, Hang Seng +1.3%, ASX +0.9%, Shanghai closed, Kospi closed

***Key economic data:***
- (CN) CHINA SEPT MANUFACTURING PMI (GOVT OFFICIAL): 50.4 V 50.5E; 2nd straight expansion; matches 23-month high; Non-manufacturing PMI (Services): 53.7 v 53.5 prior
- (HK) Macau Sept casino revenue 18.4B patacas v 18.8B m/m, y/y: +7.4% (2nd straight increase after 26 months of decline) v +1.1% prior
- (JP) JAPAN Q3 TANKAN LARGE MANUFACTURING INDEX: 6 V 7E; MANUFACTURERS OUTLOOK: 6 V 8E; ALL-INDUSTRY CAPEX: 6.3% V 6.5%E
- (JP) JAPAN SEPT FINAL PMI MANUFACTURING: 50.4 V 50.3 PRELIM
- (AU) AUSTRALIA SEPT AIG MANUFACTURING INDEX: 49.8 V 46.9 PRIOR (2nd consecutive month of contraction)
- (AU) AUSTRALIA SEPT MELBOURNE INSTITUTE INFLATION M/M: 0.4% (3-month high) V 0.2% PRIOR; Y/Y: 1.3% (3-month high) V 1.2% PRIOR
- (AU) AUSTRALIA SEPT CORELOGIC RPDATA HOUSE PRICES M/M: 1.0% V 1.1% PRIOR
- (KR) SOUTH KOREA SEPT TRADE BALANCE: $7.1B V $7.3BE; Exports Y/Y: -5.9% v -4.2%e; Imports Y/Y: -2.3% v -2.7%e

***Speakers / Press / Fixed Income***
China:
- (CN) China implements additional property control measures in more cities over the past several days - financial press
- (CN) ANZ: China PMI figures indicate that September's economic statistics will be much more resilient than expected
- (CN) ING raises China 2016 GDP target to 6.7% from 6.6% - financial press
- (CN) PBOC pledges to maintain prudent monetary policy and proper level of liquidity - China Daily

Japan:
- (JP) BOJ Gov Kuroda: Reiterates there is plenty of room to ease policy; new framework boosted previous one
- (JP) Japan Chief Cabinet Sec Suga: BOJ govt appointment issue is far in the future
- (JP) Japan PM Abe's advisor Nakahara: BOJ Gov Kuroda may have lost his chance of getting a 2nd term - financial press
- (JP) Japan's top 5 mortgage lenders are keeping their rates unchanged in October; In wait-and-see mode after the latest BOJ policy shift to yield control - Nikkei

Australia:
- (AU) Montgomery Investments: Australia banks' ROE, which averaged 14%, is expected to fall - AFR
- (AU) S&P/ASX200 extending gains above 5,480; 1-month high

***Asia movers***
- 3382.JP Seven & I Holdings +1.2%; Cuts FY16/17 guidance to Net ¥80B from ¥172B, Op profit ¥353B from ¥379B; Rev cut to ¥5.77T from ¥6.14T prior forecast; To take a ¥61B impairment charge
- 7012.JP Kawasaki Heavy: -11.3%; Cuts FY16/17 guidance to Net ¥16.5B v ¥49B prior, Op Profit ¥34B v ¥70B prior, Rev ¥1.51T v ¥1.5T prior (update)
- 6502.JP Toshiba +0.9%; Deutsche Bank Initiates 6502.JP with Buy
- 1381.HK Canvest Environment Protection +1.4%; Awarded Lufeng City waste to energy project; terms not disclosed
- 1190.HK: Bolina Holding +48.6%; Updates on share price activity; There has been negotiation regarding sale of Chairman holdings
- 992.HK Lenovo +0.8%; Sells Beijing Lenovo Research Tower in Beijing for CNY1.78B; gain arising from the Disposal is estimated to be ~CNY1.381B (update)
- 1928.HK Sands China LTD +1.6%, 2282.HK MGM China +3.3%, 27.HK Galaxy Entertainment +3.4%, 880.HK SJM Holdings +2.1%; Macau Sept casino revenue was 2nd straight increase