FT : Victoria Secret owner posts deeper than expected fall in March sales

L Brands disclosed on Wednesday a sharper than expected fall in its March sales, but shares ticked higher after its Bath & Body Works business topped estimates.

The group said its comparable store sales, an important metric for retailers, fell 10 per cent in the five weeks ending on April 1. That was deeper than the 9.1 per cent decline Wall Street was expecting.

Like for like sales at lingerie brand Victoria’s Secret, its largest business unit by revenues, declined by 13 per cent, compared with estimates of a 10.8 per cent fall.

L Brands said the exit by Victoria’s Secret from swimwear and apparel reduced the brand’s comp. sales by 10 percentage points, and the company’s by 7pp. The later Easter holiday also posed a 2 – 3pp headwind to company comp. sales.

Bath & Body Works, which sells items like soaps and fragrances, fared better, posting flat March comp. sales. Wall Street had forecast a 2.2 per cent fall.

L Brands shares climbed by 2.1 per cent in pre-market trading.

FT : City of London to offer free public wi-fi

City of London to offer free public wi-fi

The City of London Corporation has awarded a multi-million pound contract to Cornerstone to build a small-cell network across the Square Mile that will offer a free public wi-fi network and prepare the ground for an upgrade to 5G.

Cornerstone, which is jointly owned by Vodafone and O2, will install small cells on lamposts, street signs and CCTV cameras to flood the City with faster wi-fi speeds capable of providing video calling and streaming services.

It expects the new network, which replaces an existing wi-fi network provided by The Cloud which is now owned by Sky, to be operational by August.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up:
  • TENX +30%, LEDS +19.6%, SCON +15.1%, URRE +12.4%, WYY+11.9%, YUMC +10.4%, KOPN +8.2%, PLUG +8%, MTL +5.2%
  • MACK +5.1%, SUPN +4.3%, BBBY +3.5%, ZPIN +3.3%, JAZZ+3.1%, TIG +3.1%, MDT +2.2%, COST +1.9%, MT +1.6%, VALE +1.6%
  • BBL +1.5%, RIO +1.3%, BHP +1%, TOT +1%, ABB +1%, UN +0.9%,AU +0.8%, GLPG +0.6%, BSBR +0.6%
Gapping down:
  • CAFD -15%, VII -9.4%, SYNC -8.4%, RECN -8.4%, TEUM -6.5%,AMD -2.6%, WGO -2.4%, GPRO -1.9%
  • FRED -1.6%, CLNS -1.5%, SPWR -0.8%, CBIO -0.8%, INNL -0.5%,GSK -0.5%, AZN -0.5%

WSJ : Spotify Finally Readies an IPO...That’s Not an IPO

Spotify Finally Readies an IPO...That’s Not an IPO
Music-streaming service considers a direct listing, bypassing the typical public-offering script

Music-streaming service Spotify AB is readying an initial public offering that is expected by year-end. The rub is this: It may not really be an IPO.

Spotify is seriously considering a direct listing, in which the company would simply register its shares on a public exchange and let them trade freely, according to people familiar with the matter. The company wouldn’t raise any new money or use underwriters to place new blocks of stock.

That would mark a departure from the typical IPO, in which new investors buy shares from the company or its early investors, or both, the night before they start trading. The initial price is set by underwriters following extensive meetings with potential new investors.


In a direct listing, investors purchase shares in the open market after they are listed. The price is set organically based on supply and demand. Spotify, which has raised more than $1 billion in equity, was last valued privately at $8.5 billion in June 2015. The Swedish company is targeting a public valuation of more than $10 billion, the people said. The 10-year-old company may list its shares on a U.S. exchange as early as September.

If the company does list this way successfully, it could create a path for other highly valued technology companies with ready access to cash to quickly move into the public domain without using the typical IPO script.

Spotify last year issued a $1 billion convertible bond to parties including TPG and Dragoneer Investment Group. The interest rate of 5% increases 1 percentage point every six months until the company goes public, giving it a potential incentive to pursue a listing sooner rather than later, The Wall Street Journal has reported. Having a public stock would also give Spotify’s investors and employees the opportunity to cash in their shares.

By pursuing a direct listing, the company could save on hefty underwriting fees and avoid dilution that comes with issuing new shares, according to some of the people familiar with the matter. Its early investors would be subject to less stringent lockups governing the sale of insiders’ shares, those people said. What’s more, the company could avoid the first-day trading pop that characterizes many IPOs shepherded by underwriters. They are good for some investors but also indicate a company left money on the table.

There are risks to this approach, whose consideration by Spotify was earlier reported by Mergermarket. With market forces determining the share price from the outset, the company’s public debut could be more volatile and unpredictable. Also missing would be the large blocks of stock underwriters typically allocate to investors they believe will hold the shares for the long term and promote trading stability.


Spotify, which recently hired banks to advise on the process, could still choose to move forward with a more-traditional IPO, one person said.

Several IPO watchers said they could think of few examples of major companies going public in the U.S. in this way. Direct listings have mostly been used by small companies that don’t anticipate much trading in their stock, including those that have just emerged from bankruptcy. But some sizable companies have used them over the years. Freddie Mac, for example, in 1989 became a public company by listing its existing stock in a similar fashion.

Spotify’s case is the latest sign of the growing antipathy toward public ownership in Silicon Valley and corporate America more broadly. The number of public companies in the U.S. has declined dramatically as private funding sources multiply and officials weigh the cost of increased scrutiny from investors and regulators. When companies go public, they are increasingly doing so in ways that insulate them from such forces, like handing founders outsize voting control, as in Snap Inc.’s recent share sale.

In Spotify’s case, it is an approach that would spell bad news for a key business on Wall Street that is already reeling.

Last year, investment banks generated the smallest amount of revenue from share sales in more than 20 years, according to Dealogic. IPO activity and traditional stock sales by companies that are already public have been anemic.

Spotify’s advisers would get much smaller fees than IPO underwriters typically receive, the people said. In the case of the $4 billion Snap debut, underwriters shared about $100 million—one of the smallest fees on record on a percentage basis.

Spotify wouldn’t be the first company to try to disintermediate Wall Street. Google, now part of Alphabet Inc., employed a so-called Dutch auction in its 2004 IPO in an effort to put more shares in the hands of small investors and avoid a first-day pop.

But in a sign of the difficulty of bucking the traditional approach, Google’s IPO was priced at $85 a share, below the $108 to $135 the company targeted, as investors struggled to pinpoint its value. The shares soon started climbing and now change hands for about $850 apiece.

If it lists directly, Spotify would likely need to renegotiate the terms of the convertible-debt facility it raised last year, one of the people said.

Spotify had agreed that the investors could convert the debt into equity at a 20% discount to the share price if an IPO takes place one year hence, according to a previous Journal report. If it takes place later, the discount increases. Since this wouldn’t be a typical public offering, it may not trigger a conversion. So Spotify may need to negotiate with the investors a price at which they would receive equity.

NYT : President Trump in second NY Times interview says he is considering 'accel

President Trump in second NY Times interview says he is considering 'accelerating' infrastructure plan -- says he may combine it with healthcare or tax reform legislation

Partial Transcript: Trump’s Interview With The Times Link to article : http://nyti.ms/2nNxAKi

  • Yesterday, Speaker Paul Ryan indicated that tax reform will take longer than expected because House, Senate, and White House are still working on plans (see 4/5 16:06)
  • Potential Infrastructure stocks: CAT, MLM, URI, VMC, TEX
  • Potential Healthcare stocks: XLV, HCA, THC, CYH, LPNT, CNC, IBB

WASHINGTON — The following is a partial transcript of President Trump’s interview with The New York Times’s Maggie Haberman and Glenn Thrush. It has been lightly edited for content and clarity, and omits several off-the-record comments and asides.

At least six White House aides were sitting in: Gary D. Cohn, President Trump’s lead economic adviser and a former president of Goldman Sachs; Reed Cordish, an assistant to the president; Sean Spicer, the press secretary; Hope Hicks, a long-serving Trump aide; and eventually Vice President Mike Pence and the chief of staff, Reince Priebus.

MAGGIE HABERMAN, White House correspondent: Seems like it’s actually not been a terrible process for [Judge Neil M.] Gorsuch, right? I mean, it’s been pretty smooth.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: It’s never an easy process. I think it’s been very smooth considering there’s tremendous hostility on the other side. I think it’s been pretty smooth.

Continue reading the main story
The Trump White House
Stories about President Trump’s administration.
No Rest for the Wary: First Family’s Needs Strain Secret Service
APR 6
Trump and Xi’s First Meeting: How Long Will the Cordiality Last?
APR 6
G.O.P. and Democrats Set to Collide on Filibuster and Supreme Court
APR 6
Trump Weighs Infrastructure Bill but Keeps New York Up in the Air
APR 5
A Taste of Trump Family Biographies for Young Readers
APR 5
See More »

HABERMAN: You talk to Democrats privately that will admit —

TRUMP: I do.

HABERMAN: But do they admit to you that they don’t actually have a huge objection to Gorsuch, they think that he’s probably —

TRUMP: They do. They admit that.

HABERMAN: Right. In private.

TRUMP: Elijah Cummings [a Democratic representative from Maryland] was in my office and he said, “You will go down as one of the great presidents in the history of our country.”

HABERMAN: Really.

TRUMP: And then he went out and I watched him on television yesterday and I said, “Was that the same man?”

[Laughter.]

TRUMP: But I said, and I liked him, but I said that was really nice. He said, in a group of people, “You will go down as one of the great presidents in the history of our country.” And then I watched him on television and I said, “Is that the same man that said that to me?”

GLENN THRUSH, White House correspondent: Why do you think Democrats feel the need to oppose Gorsuch? What do you think the politics is?

TRUMP: Well, I think that some of it had to do with the election. They thought they were going to win. You know, winning the Electoral College is, for a Republican, is close to impossible and I won it quite easily. And I think they are still recovering from that, but they are recovering now. I think the Susan Rice thing is a massive story. I think it’s a massive, massive story. All over the world, I mean other than The New York Times.

HABERMAN: We’ve written about it twice.

TRUMP: Huh?

HABERMAN: We’ve written about it twice.

TRUMP: Yeah, it’s a bigger story than you know. I think —

HABERMAN: You mean there’s more information that we’re not aware of?

TRUMP: I think that it’s going to be the biggest story.

THRUSH: Why? What do you think —

TRUMP: Take a look at what’s happening. I mean, first of all her performance was horrible yesterday on television even though she was interviewed by Hillary Clinton’s P.R. person, Andrea Mitchell [the NBC News journalist]. Course you’ve been accused of that also.

HABERMAN: Mostly by you, though.

TRUMP: No, no, no. Mostly by a lot of people. So you know, we’ll see what happens, but it looks like it’s breaking into a massive story.

THRUSH: What do you think are — what other shoes are there to drop on this?

HABERMAN: Yeah, what else could we learn on this?

TRUMP: I think you’re going to see a lot. I think you’ll see a lot.

HABERMAN: In terms of what she did and in terms of [unintelligible]?

TRUMP: I think in terms of what other people have done also.

HABERMAN: Really?

TRUMP: I think it’s one of the biggest stories. The Russia story is a total hoax. There has been absolutely nothing coming out of that. But what, you know, what various things led into it was the story that we’re talking about, the Susan Rice. What’s happened is terrible. I’ve never seen people so indignant, including many Democrats who are friends of mine. I’ve never seen them acting this way. Because that’s really an affront on them, you know, they are talking about civil liberties. It’s such an affront, what took place.

THRUSH: What other people do you think will get ensnared in this? Can you give us a sense? How far this might extend —

HABERMAN: From the previous administration.

TRUMP: I think from the previous administration.

THRUSH: How far up do you think this goes? Chief of staff?

TRUMP: I don’t want to say, but —

THRUSH: President?

TRUMP: I don’t want to say, but you know who. You know what was going on. You probably know better than anybody. I mean, I frankly think The Times is missing a big thing by not writing it because you’re missing out on the biggest story there is.

[Mr. Trump makes a comment off the record, and mentions the Fox News host Bill O’Reilly.]

THRUSH: We’re back on the record?

HABERMAN: Yeah, back on the record, do you think that he’s being unfairly treated? I mean, I watched it because I was curious how he was dealing with everything.

TRUMP: I think he’s a person I know well. He’s a good person. I think he may, you know, I think he shouldn’t have settled, personally, I think he shouldn’t have settled.

HABERMAN: How come?

TRUMP: Because you — should have taken it all the way. No, I know Bill. Bill’s a good person.

HABERMAN: Yeah.

TRUMP: I don’t think Bill would do anything wrong.

HOPE HICKS, White House director of strategic communications: Can we get to infrastructure? [Laughter.] Because I know we are sensitive about time.

HABERMAN: I understand. I just want to ask one last follow-up on that note, and then we’ll move on, not on O’Reilly.

TRUMP: You certainly covered O’Reilly big. Not Susan Rice, boy, O’Reilly [unintelligible]. He’s taking my place. He’s taking my place.

HABERMAN: Sir, if you could give us more information about Rice. If the administration would give us more information —

TRUMP: No, you have a lot of information. No, you have so much information.

HABERMAN: If you would have given it to us last week, we would have written it. Would you declassify some of the information so that —

TRUMP: I don’t want to talk about that.

HABERMAN: No? O.K.

TRUMP: No. I just don’t want to talk about that. It’s such an important story for our country, for the world. What took place.

HABERMAN: Why not talk about it then? With all due respect.

TRUMP: At the right time, I will be.

THRUSH: One last thing on that. Have you actually seen intelligence that leads you to believe that people other than Susan Rice are involved.

TRUMP: I don’t want to comment on anything about — other than to say I think it’s a — I think it’s truly one of the big stories of our time.

THRUSH: Do you think she might have committed a crime?

TRUMP: Do I think?

THRUSH: Yeah.

TRUMP: Yes, I think.

HABERMAN: On infrastructure, just generally speaking, there’s been a lot of reports floating around about this package that you’re looking at. Can you give us the broad outlooks?

TRUMP: We want to do a great infrastructure plan, and on that side I will say that we’re going to have, I believe, tremendous Democrat support. We are also going to have some good Republican support, and I think it’s going to be one of the very bipartisan bills and it’s going to happen. I may put it in with health care.

>>> Fred's beats by $0.05, reports revs in-line; March SSS decline 0.5% YoY; pro

Fred's beats by $0.05, reports revs in-line; March SSS decline 0.5% YoY; provides update on Rite Aid transaction
  • Reports Q4 (Jan) loss of $0.11 per share, excluding non-recurring items of $0.49 per share, $0.05 better than the Capital IQ Consensus of ($0.16); revenues fell 4.5% year/year to $529.7 mln vs the $530.8 mln Capital IQ Consensus.
  • March 2017 Sales
    • Comparable store sales for March decreased 0.5% versus an increase of 1.8% in the year-earlier month
    • The March 2017 comparable store sales reflected the benefit of tax refunds, which were delayed from February to March, but were offset by a later Easter (April 16 this year versus March 27 last year), shifting holiday sales into April.
    • Fred's total sales for the month decreased 2.7% to $208.6 mln from $214.3 mln in March 2016
Rite Aid Transaction update
  • On December 20, 2016, the Company announced that it signed an agreement with Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) and Rite Aid (RAD) to purchase 865 stores for $950 mln in cash. Fred's Pharmacy is working collaboratively with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Rite Aid and the FTC to help obtain the FTC's approval of Walgreen Boots Alliance's pending acquisition of Rite Aid and the divestiture of certain Rite Aid assets to Fred's Pharmacy.
  • Fred's Pharmacy remains committed to purchasing additional assets, including up to 1,200 Rite Aid stores, to the extent necessary to obtain the FTC's approval of the transaction. Completion of the transaction is subject to approval by the FTC, as well as other customary regulatory approvals and closing conditions.
  • Co reiterates that the transaction will accelerate the Company's healthcare growth strategy, generating considerable benefits for our customers, patients, payors, supplier partners, team members and shareholders.

WWD : CEO Talks: Isabel Marant’s Sophie Duruflé and Anouck Duranteau-Loeper

CEO Talks: Isabel Marant’s Sophie Duruflé and Anouck Duranteau-Loeper
The two executives at the head of the original Parisian chic brand talk about job-sharing, e-commerce and stepping out of your comfort zone.

PARIS — Until the sale of her label in July of last year, Isabel Marant was among the rare independent designers at the head of a large business who resisted pressure to open stores and expand into new categories.

Since Montefiore Investment bought 51 percent of its capital, the brand has undergone a quiet revolution, marked by the arrival in November of Anouck Duranteau-Loeper as deputy chief executive, working alongside Sophie Duruflé and Nathalie Chemouny, Marant’s two original business partners and managing directors.

Together, they are mapping out the future of the brand credited with inventing the bohemian Parisienne hipster-meets-tomboy look favored by celebrities such as Beyoncé, Gwyneth Paltrow and Kendall and Kylie Jenner.

In an interview in Marant’s spacious new showroom on Place des Victoires, Duranteau-Loeper and Duruflé detailed the initiatives they are putting into place, which include launching an e-commerce site in June and bolstering the label’s handbag assortment.

The brand is streamlining its operations by bringing retail and wholesale under the purview of Jean Keller, who has been named vice president of global distribution, a new position. Meanwhile, it has grouped accessories for Isabel Marant and its secondary line, Isabel Marant Étoile, into a single collection.

Duruflé noted that with 2016 wholesale revenues of around 150 million euros, or $166 million at average exchange for the period, the house clearly needed a partner to grow, even if its founder was initially reluctant.

“We had been approached by quite a few people over the years and nobody had made a convincing enough case until then for us to consider a possible partnership. The idea was not to sell the house, but to continue moving forward with a strong partner by our side,” she said.

“We wanted to preserve our distinctive, selective positioning. Our aim was not to open 250 stores over the next 10 years. That was often the kind of blueprint that people were presenting to us, and it didn’t appeal to us at all,” Duruflé added.

She felt that Montefiore understood the house’s history. “I think they were really attracted to the personality, the product and everything done so far, without wanting to alter the DNA of the brand,” she said. “We don’t want to betray ourselves and our customers and fans. We want to remain an honest brand.”

The deal marked the first investment in fashion for Montefiore, whose portfolio includes budget hotel chain B&B Hotels, car-hire broker Auto Escape and marketing and opinion research firm BVA.

“It’s a fund that invests a lot in family-run firms, so I think they have a real respect and understanding for entrepreneurs,” said Duranteau-Loeper.

“Their talent lies in being aware of, understanding and appreciating the specificities and flaws that go with that territory — because things are not as smooth as in a big, structured firm — and in supporting a gradual transition,” she added.

She noted the company usually holds its assets for between five and seven years. “That is a time horizon that allows you to work in a qualitative way over time,” she said.

Duranteau-Loeper had been Paco Rabanne’s fashion general manager since 2013 and returned the iconic Sixties brand to the Paris retail scene after a 14-year absence, as well as launched online commerce.

She was drawn to Isabel Marant by its singular identity and the founder’s strong personality. “It has a unique and very precious positioning that must be protected against the general drive toward standardization. Isabel wants to dress sexy, feminine, independent, cool, modern women,” she said.

Marant has a thriving business in shoes, with hits including wedge sneakers and chain-trimmed suede boots, but has in the past resisted diversifying into other categories beyond one-off efforts, including a limited-edition watch and an eyewear collaboration with Oliver Peoples.

Her collaboration with Swedish high-street retailer H&M in 2013 further boosted the label’s global profile.

“Isabel has the legitimacy to be active in a number of segments. It has to be something she wants to do,” said Duruflé. “I think she needs new challenges, and it’s interesting to stretch yourself. The fact that we now have partners has brought these issues to the top of the agenda.”

Handbags, especially, have been a sticking point as Marant is married to accessories designer Jérôme Dreyfuss and has said she does not want to step on his turf. That is about to change, as the brand introduced a permanent handbag line for fall and is looking at possible licenses, including eyewear and perfume.

“Isabel has designed bags in the past, but we never pushed the category. We know that in order to make it work, we need lasting designs, and Isabel was producing different things every season,” said Duruflé. “Now, we are taking a different approach and working on something more permanent.”

Duranteau-Loeper, who spent 10 years at luxury conglomerate LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, and was Céline’s leather goods and accessories director before joining Paco Rabanne, also wants to reinforce Isabel Marant’s ready-to-wear offering, including Étoile.

“Étoile is another important facet of the brand, since revenues are split fairly evenly between the main Isabel Marant collection, Étoile and accessories, representing a third each,” she said. “It is not at all the poor parent. Isabel loves working on Étoile, as these are the pieces she wears on a daily basis.”

Average retail prices for the main collection range between 350 euros and 1,000 euros, or $375 and $1,065 at current exchange rates, while the Étoile line is priced between 150 euros and 500 euros, or $160 and $535, said Duruflé.

A key challenge for Isabel Marant will be the launch of its e-commerce site, in partnership with Yoox Net-a-porter Group. Duranteau-Loeper said online sales should account for 5 percent of revenues within two years.

“Since our network is still small, our current approach to retail is very personalized. We know all our customers, so it’s very tailored, whereas this will be on a larger scale. I think e-commerce is going to bring us a lot, because we will be exposed to a much bigger customer base,” she said.

At the same time, the brand is being careful not to cannibalize its traditional e-commerce partners, whether pure players like Net-a-porter or department stores such as Barneys New York, by carefully tweaking its online offering.

“Our partners have done a great job of representing us for a long time, and they remain important to us. Now it’s about finding our voice. I think the fact that we are launching late allows us to have a functioning ecosystem and carve out our own path. We are convinced the customers who will buy on isabelmarant.com are not the same as those who will find us through our partners, even online,” she said.

Marant also plans to expand its network of stores. It has some 800 points of sale worldwide and 23 freestanding boutiques, of which nine are directly operated. That number will rise to 10 with the imminent opening of its store in Miami’s Design District, which will be followed by a boutique in Oslo.

Previously home to Hermès, the 2,150-square-foot Miami boutique features a new concept designed by Laurent Deroo, the French architect best known for his store designs for A.P.C.

“I think that in the development strategy of the brand, we have always gone for cool locations that are slightly off the beaten track, but not totally. Going into a more established mall in Miami would not have been right for us,” said Duranteau-Loeper.

Isabel Marant makes 80 percent of its revenues outside of France and the executive would like to open another five or six directly operated stores worldwide in the next two years, with a focus on its principal markets: Europe and the U.S. It has only one store in China, located in Shanghai’s Reel mall.

“We are looking for other opportunities in China, but you will be able to count them on the fingers of one hand, for sure,” she said.

Though their job-sharing set-up may be unusual, the two women said the process has been symbiotic, especially since they temporarily took over the management of retail and wholesale operations, pending Keller’s arrival this month.

“We started by defining a budget, and then we each have our areas of responsibility. Our offices are right next to each other, so we spend our day talking to each other through the wall,” Duranteau-Loeper said with a laugh.

“We exchange views about everything, in a very natural and informal way,” added Duruflé. “It’s interesting to have her point of view and input on key issues, so we work on almost everything simultaneously.”

Marant, Duruflé and Chemouny together retain a 49 percent stake in the brand, founded in 1994, but Duruflé admitted the company culture is fast evolving. “I think we still have the same spirit, but this represents a new chapter. I’m not going to say that nothing has changed, because it has changed, of course,” she said.

However, Duranteau-Loeper emphasized that the core values of the label remain the same.

“We approach things more rationally, perhaps less emotionally, but I am convinced that what makes this brand unique, and why people can clearly tell the difference between Isabel Marant and all the brands that try to copy us, is the culture of the house and the value of its designer. These are things we must absolutely keep, so the idea is not to revolutionize the house, but to make it evolve while preserving all its strengths and singularities,” she concluded.