>>> Monsanto beats by $0.39, beats on revs; sees FY17 EPS at high end of range,

--> MON +1.35% 47k shares traded

Monsanto beats by $0.39, beats on revs; sees FY17 EPS at high end of range, in-line -- being acquired by Bayer (BAYRY)
  • Reports Q2 (Feb) earnings of $3.19 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.39 better than the Capital IQ Consensus of $2.80; revenues rose 12.0% year/year to $5.07 bln vs the $4.73 bln Capital IQ Consensus. The co's performance was driven in part by strong gross profit growth from its corn and soybean businesses, the absence of the Argentine peso devaluation and benefit from the sale of its Latitude wheat fungicide business. In reporting earnings results, executives reinforce confidence about the cumulative strength of the business, updating full-year guidance to the high end of the range for both as-reported and ongoing EPS.
  • Monsanto also highlights progress in its merger with Bayer (BAYRY) as both parties continue to work toward completion of the transaction by the end of calendar year 2017.
  • Co issues in-line guidance for FY17, sees EPS at the high end of $4.50-4.90, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $4.76 Capital IQ Consensus. This reflects the co's increased confidence in the growth expected for the year and assumes the change in currency rates will have a relatively neutral effect on a full-year basis. From a gross profit perspective, the co continues to expect the Seed and Genomics segment gross profit to increase mid-single digits as a percent year-over-year. Within its Ag Productivity segment, gross profit is still expected to be in the range of $850 to $950 million, though now at the lower end of the range.
  • For third quarter, the company expects as-reported earnings per share to be roughly flat due to the absence of Argentine-related tax matters call-out of $0.50 per share, mostly offset by the expected decline in ongoing earnings per share, from the absence of the alfalfa deal, which equaled roughly $0.34 cents of earnings last year, and the volume timing shift from third quarter to second quarter in the Europe and U.S. corn businesses.
  • For the full year, the company now anticipates these earnings to translate to the high end of the range of $1.2 billion to $1.6 billion of free cash flow, reflecting operating cash flow at the high end of the range of $2.4 billion to $2.8 billion and capital expenditures of $1.2 billion for fiscal year 2017. Overall operating expenses in 2017, excluding the pending Bayer transaction-related costs and restructuring charges, are expected to increase slightly with the growth of Monsanto's business.

FT : Steven Cohen invests in start-up aiming to shake up bank research

Steven Cohen invests in start-up aiming to shake up bank research
Hedge fund magnate invests in company aiming to chart a future for analysts’ research

Hedge fund magnate Steven Cohen and the venture capital firm led by former Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale have invested in a start-up hoping to overhaul the investment banking research model, which has come under intense pressure in recent years.

Mr Cohen’s Point72 Ventures, the VC arm of the prominent hedge fund manager’s family office, and Mr Lonsdale’s 8VC led the investment round in Street Contxt, which says it “helps brokerages, independent research providers, and asset managers distribute, manage, unbundle and value research”. The size of the investment was not disclosed, but the company has raised $15m.

Investment research is one of the most high-profile parts of the banking industry, with star analysts and economists often closely followed for their forecasts. But falling profits and more onerous regulations have forced a cull since the financial crisis.

The number of analysts working at the world’s 12 biggest investment banks fell to 5,981 last year, according to Coalition. That was down from 6,282 at the end of 2015, and 6,634 at the end of 2012, when the data provider began to collect the numbers. Many smaller brokerages and banks have made even deeper cuts, according to analysts.

The pain is expected to intensify in the coming years, especially with the advent of the Mifid II regulatory package in Europe. This will compel asset managers to strip out payment for research, either pushing the costs directly on to clients or covering it themselves, rather than the traditional way of rewarding banks and brokerages through trading commissions. That has spurred several initiatives inside and outside the finance industry, aimed at changing how research is done, distributed and paid for.

“It’s all coming to a head,” said Blair Livingston, Street Contxt’s chief executive and a former RBC and IEX executive. “Wall Street is going through an ecosystem change, where it’s all about content. And there are cost pressures on all sides.”

Street Contxt is a platform where investment banks, independent research boutiques and brokerages can distribute their research. It aims to better tailor offerings to clients such as asset managers and hedge funds, which are swamped by thousands of emailed reports a day, many of which go unread or even unopened.

This longstanding problem for the research industry is being exacerbated by many investment groups trimming how much external research they use. Bigger asset managers, in particular, are building up their own internal analysis groups.

BlackRock’s biggest mutual fund, the $40bn Global Allocation Fund, has halved how much it pays for research through trading commissions over the past two years, from $28.8m in 2014 to $13.4m last year, according to Reuters.

“The asset management industry is currently undergoing immense change, and Street Contxt’s data-driven networks increase transparency and help both brokers and asset managers focus on the analysis that is both most valuable and relevant to traders and the functioning of the markets,” Mr Lonsdale said in the statement announcing the investment.

Reuters - Russia denies Assad to blame for chemical attack, on course for collis

Russia denies Assad to blame for chemical attack, on course for collision with Trump

Russia suggested on Wednesday it would publicly stand by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad despite outrage over a chemical weapons attack, setting Donald Trump's new U.S. administration on course for a head-on diplomatic collision with Moscow.

Western countries including the United States blamed Assad's armed forces for the chemical attack, which choked scores of people to death in the town of Khan Sheikhoun in a rebel-held area of northern Syria hit by government air strikes.

Washington said it believed the deaths were caused by sarin nerve gas dropped by Syrian aircraft. But Moscow offered an alternative explanation that could shield Assad: it said it believed poison gas had leaked from a rebel chemical weapons depot struck by Syrian bombs.

Hasan Haj Ali, commander of the Free Idlib Army rebel group, called the Russian statement a "lie".

"Everyone saw the plane while it was bombing with gas," he told Reuters from northwestern Syria.

"Likewise, all the civilians in the area know that there are no military positions there, or places for the manufacture (of weapons). The various factions of the opposition are not capable of producing these substances."

The incident is the first time Washington has accused Assad of using sarin since 2013, when hundreds of people died in an attack on a Damascus suburb. At that time, Washington said Assad had crossed a "red line" set by then-President Barack Obama.

Obama threatened an air campaign to topple Assad but called it off at the last minute after the Syrian leader agreed to give up his chemical arsenal under a deal brokered by Moscow, a decision which Trump has long said proved Obama's weakness.

The new incident means Trump is faced with same dilemma that faced his predecessor: whether to openly challenge Moscow and risk deep involvement in a Middle East war by seeking to punish Assad for using banned weapons, or compromise and accept the Syrian leader remaining in power at the risk of looking weak.

Trump described Tuesday's incident as "heinous actions by the Bashar al-Assad regime", but also faulted Obama for having failed to enforce the red line four years ago. Obama's spokesman declined to comment.

Washington, Paris and London have drawn up a draft U.N. Security Council statement condemning the attack and demanding an investigation. Russia has the power to veto it, as it has done to block all previous resolutions that would harm Assad.

"BARBARIC REGIME"

Trump's response to a diplomatic confrontation with Moscow will be closely watched at home because of accusations by his political opponents that he is too supportive of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

He has previously said the United States and Russia should work more closely in Syria to fight against Islamic State.

U.S. intelligence agencies say Russia intervened in the U.S. presidential election last year through computer hacking to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. The FBI and two congressional committees are investigating whether figures from the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow, which the White House denies.

The chemical attack in Idlib province, one of the last major strongholds of rebels that have fought since 2011 to topple Assad, will complicate diplomatic efforts to end a war that has killed hundreds of thousands of people and driven half of Syrians from their homes.

Jihadist groups have a strong presence in Idlib alongside other rebel groups, some of which have received backing from powers including Turkey and the United States.

Over the past several months Western countries, including the United States, had been quietly dropping their demands that Assad leave power in any deal to end the war, accepting that the rebels no longer had the capability to topple him by force.

The use of banned chemical weapons would make it harder for the international community to sign off on any peace deal that does not remove him.

British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who two months ago shifted his country's policy by saying Assad should be allowed to run for re-election, said on Wednesday that he must go.

"This is a barbaric regime that has made it impossible for us to imagine them continuing to be an authority over the people of Syria after this conflict is over."

WWD : Mongolia’s Cashmere Industry at a Crossroads

Mongolia’s Cashmere Industry at a Crossroads
Desertification, global warming and an increasing goat population could spell trouble for the sector.

ULAANBAATAR, Mongolia — A cashmere scarf from Hermès — with its colorful dyed yarn and intricate patterning — can go for over $1,000. Shang Xia, a Chinese high-end lifestyle boutique backed by Hermès, showcases cashmere felt robes that retail at around the same price point. Yet the fiber that is painstakingly crafted into these one-of-a-kind pieces has a more humble origin — the cashmere goats of Mongolia.

With more than 25 million goats grazing on the country’s steppes, Mongolia commands the second-largest cashmere stock worldwide, accounting for about a third of the global supply. Last year, according to the Mongolia Wool and Cashmere Association, the country produced 8,500 tons of raw cashmere fiber, and it is expecting that amount to climb above 9,000 tons in 2017.

But the industry — as well as the nomadic herders who raise the goats — is at a crossroads. The rapid, exponential increase in livestock throughout the country has led to the decimation of pastures, which threatens desertification of the lands. Meanwhile, herders who are at a loss for how to gain a more viable income are hit hard by the growing frequency of harsh winter conditions, which is called a dzud — a Mongolian word referring to a weather phenomenon that can leave massive numbers of livestock dead due to heavy snowfall and ice.

Although a dzud used to sweep the country once a decade, Mongolia is currently experiencing one for the second year in a row, with temperatures dipping as low as minus 58 degrees Fahrenheit in the northern part of the country.

So far this winter, 168,000 livestock have perished, affecting more than 265,000 people in herder households, according to the Mongolia Red Cross Society. The number of dead livestock is likely to climb past 300,000 by mid-May, when the first grass sprouts on the ice-covered plains.

Nyamji Dolgosuren, 46, is one of the tens of thousands affected by this year’s dzud. Residing along the snow-covered valley of Khovsgol province, Mongolia’s northernmost region, Nyamji and her family are desperate to keep their cashmere goats alive, going so far as to allow the weaker ones to stay with them in their warm ger, a Mongolian yurt. So far, her family has lost more than 50 animals out of their 300-strong flock of sheep and goats.

“We want to keep the goats safe so that when it gets warm, we can comb out their cashmere and sell it, and then repay our debts,” she said. Her family had borrowed money to buy more hay and feed for her starving herd to get them through the harsh winter,” Nyamji explained.

“We owe about over 500,000 Mongolian tugrik [roughly $200] so far,” she said. “But the snow is still here, and winter is not over yet. It might continue for much longer.”

The price that raw cashmere fetches can vary widely. Nyamji said that the highest amount her family has ever gotten is 60,000 tugrik, or $24, a kilogram. Manufacturers in Ulaanbaatar say that the price is higher in the eastern provinces, where the quality of the goats’ fiber is finer.

This income serves as a direct lifeline for herders, which is why there is an ever-proliferating population of goats grazing upon Mongolia’s plains. In 1990, the number of goats was about 4 million; by 2016, that had skyrocketed to about 25 million. This is problematic for maintaining the pastureland because goats eat every single part of the grass, and an unceasing population of livestock — which includes cows, horses, sheep and camels in Mongolia — will lead to less food if the pasture is not given time to regrow.

The rapid increase of cashmere goats in Mongolia is directly due to the fact that a sheer volume of goats can better a household’s life, said Ulziibodijav Jambal, founder of Bodio’s of Mongolia, a company that sources and produces cashmere garments. Bodio’s also provides dehaired cashmere — a process where the raw fiber is cleaned of its coarser properties — to brands like New York-based cashmere retailer Naadam and Canadian designer Turrath.

Ulziibodijav firmly rejects that the goat population should be controlled by dictating livestock limits to households, despite its exponential increase in the last two decades.

“Generally, if the number of all the livestock in Mongolia were to increase endlessly, then yes, that would affect the pasture and cause desertification,” Ulziibodijav said. “But the way to solve this problem is not to tell the herders what to do or what not to do because it’s their private property and it’s how they make a living.”

He explained that despite the luxury classification of cashmere in the global market, raw cashmere stock does not actually bring wealth to a typical herder household of four. “If a herder has 1,000 goats, he can get 300 kilograms of cashmere every year from it. Raw cashmere is about $30 to $35 a kilograms, which means it is about $9,000 a year,” he said, explaining that this is enough just to get by. “If a family has four people, that means that for the whole year, one person’s income is only $2,250.”

Yondonsambuu G., vice director of the Mongolian Wool and Cashmere Association, said that 40 to 60 percent of the average household income is related to cashmere, and the best way to convince herders to diversify their livestock is for the government to develop the agricultural sector and create a meat-processing industry.

“Currently, the situation is that selling cashmere is the only way to make more money,” Yondonsambuu said. “But from the government’s side, they need to work on creating a meat processing industry, so that they can export the meat….If it can work, then herders may be able to diversify and maybe we can control the number of the goats.”

However, this dream will take at least a decade to be realized, Yondonsambuu said, due to the varying standards of the meat industry.

In the meantime, the value of cashmere in the global market is decreasing due to the large supply of it, said Ulziibodijav. Twenty years ago, China — the number-one supplier worldwide — produced more than 9,000 tons of cashmere, while Mongolia made about 3,000 tons. Now the supply from China has increased to about 20,000 tons, while Mongolia is about half that amount.

“With over 30,000 tons, the supply has tripled and the price has gone down. [Cashmere] will naturally go toward the midmarket range,” Ulziibodijav said.

Erdenetuya Mangaljav, the general director of Sor Cashmere — a company whose clients include suppliers to Hermès and Shang Xia — said that Mongolia needs to focus on refining its fiber quality. She is also a recently elected parliamentarian in Ulaanbaatar, representing the capital’s northern district of Chingeltei.

“China is the number-one global producer, and their quality is also the best because they actually work on breeding the goats. Right now, the government is discussing how to not go after the numbers — we need to try to source better-quality cashmere,” Erdenetuya said, explaining that only 40 percent of cashmere from Mongolia is considered good.

To encourage herders to focus on quality and not quantity — a move that would also be better for the country’s pastures — Erdenetuya said that she and the cashmere association are working on a pricing scale.

“Good-quality cashmere will get a better price and bad-quality cashmere will not get such a high price,” she said. “We’ve already started doing this. For example, we give a higher price to the eastern aimags [provinces] and a lower price to the western aimags because there is a difference in microns in the fiber.”

For her part, she is focusing on producing more value-added garments. “I want to concentrate on making higher-quality yarn and clothing, not on the quantity. I am not really looking to become a mass producer,” she said. “I just want to concentrate on getting the best-quality products to the finest customers.”

Herders across Mongolia are experiencing price fluctuations when it comes to their cashmere stock, which is coupled with the fact that the country is going through an economic slowdown. In northern Khovsgol province, herders interviewed quoted prices for raw cashmere ranging from 45,000 tugrik to 80,000 tugrik a kilogram, roughly $18 to $32 a kilogram.

This reflects how unstable the household income can be, especially if a family’s fortune is reliant on something as capricious as the weather.

Batsuri Sharkhuu, 54, is currently experiencing the toughest winter of his life. Out of his herd of more than 200 goats and sheep, more than 100 have died from the dzud.

“The only chance to survive is to sell these animals but with a winter like this, it is hard to say if I’ll even have any animals left,” he said.

Batsuri explained that when the animals are hungry for food, they would use their hooves to chop at the ice and snow desperately, tiring them out and causing them to die from the severe cold. Some hungry goats would even resort to eating each other’s fur when crowded in a shelter.

“Our only other source of income is from combing cashmere,” he said, adding that last year’s price was about $18 a kilogram. “That is a very low price. About six years ago, it was 70 to 80,000 tugrik [$28 to $32] a kilogram.”

Powerless against the dzud, Batsuri expresses weariness at having half his family’s livestock — in effect, his savings — wiped out by a single winter.

“I’m tired. I have a bad hip, and my wife has problems with her kidney,” he said. “After this winter, we are planning to stop being herders and move to a village instead.”