FT : SoftBank move to slash WeWork investment sends shockwaves

SoftBank move to slash WeWork investment sends shockwaves
Reduced funding alarms Silicon Valley but reflects declining sentiment in public markets

This week one of the world’s largest investors radically revised down its investment into one of the world’s most valuable private companies.

SoftBank’s decision to slash its investment in the shared-office provider WeWork from $16bn down to $2bn will have sent shockwaves through Silicon Valley board rooms. The Japanese investor also revealed that its Vision Fund, backed by Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, was no longer involved in the deal. So, has this spelt the end to soaring valuations and mega-funding rounds for start-ups?

Anand Sanwal, chief executive and co-founder of CBInsights, does not think so.

“This is mostly about WeWork being revalued as a real estate company rather than tech company. This does not signal a wider market slowdown in private markets,” he said.

Mr Sanwal may be right. Private markets are awash with cash. Venture capital-backed companies raised $207bn globally in 2018, up 25.9 per cent year on year, while the aggregate value of tech unicorns in the US hit a record $526bn.

If technology companies Uber, Airbnb, Pinterest and Slack were to float this year at their rumoured initial public offering valuations, they would all rank among the 10 largest venture-backed IPOs by value.


But no one is immune from the weakening sentiment seen in the public markets. One leading European venture capitalist said: “I think there is a lot of reason to believe that it will trickle down. It has to trickle down.”

He believes it will be tough for private companies who are preparing to raise a new round of funding and value themselves against comparable public companies whose share prices have recently tumbled.

“There is probably more merit in waiting than in rushing” to close a new round in the current climate, the investor added.

And those with untested business models could also be at risk. Mr Sanwal suggests that for a lot of tech start-ups, their business model is just about raising money. He sees a flight of capital if the malaise in equity markets and economic outlook continues to weaken.

“Over the last many years, tech investing has seen what folks might call tourists entering the space. All the cool kids investing in tech attracted lots of capital — from hedge funds to sovereign wealth funds. When sentiment changes, those folks may run back to their core,” he said.

Reuters - Citadel folds Fundamental Strategies into other units, lays off manage

Citadel folds Fundamental Strategies into other units, lays off manager

NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - Hedge fund powerhouse Citadel, which oversees $30 billion, folded its Fundamental Strategies unit into two other businesses and laid off a portfolio manager, people familiar with the matter said on Friday.
Michael Doniger, director of research and a portfolio manager at Citadel Fundamental Strategies, was let go this week, the sources said. Citadel folded the Fundamental Strategies business, led by Eric Felder, into Aptigon Capital and Global Credit, two other businesses also headed by Felder.
Felder joined Citadel in 2017 as senior managing director in charge of Fundamental Strategies. Last year he took over responsibility for managing Aptigon, one of Citadel's stock-picking businesses.

Felder oversees roughly two dozen portfolio managers.
A Citadel spokeswoman declined to comment. Doniger could not be reached for comment.
Citadel's main multi-strategy fund returned 9.1 percent last year when the average hedge fund lost money.

>>> US trade tariffs among factors driving M&A in flexible packaging, experts sa

US trade tariffs among factors driving M&A in flexible packaging, experts say

  • Aluminum components for packaging at issue
  • US firms seeking international partners, targets
  • PE firms see potential for rollups

US tariffs on imported aluminum are expected to drive additional M&A activity in flexible packaging, a hot-growth sector that was already seeing considerable dealmaking, experts say.
According to Alison Keane, CEO of the Flexible Packaging Association, the 10% tariffs on raw imported aluminum, and other duties on Chinese goods like aluminum foil imposed last year by the Trump Administration, have prompted some US companies to circumvent the duties by looking outside the US for partnerships or acquisitions. That’s because manufacturing packaging outside the US bypasses the tariffs on imported raw materials.
“If you've got a converting facility or partner in Canada, Mexico or even in China or Europe, you’re moving that business over there to escape the tariff on aluminum foil,” she said. And while the new NAFTA may result in a resolution with Canada and Mexico, trade with China could be affected “for a very long time.”
“For the US-centric companies, if they don’t already have a partner [internationally] then they are looking for partners and that may mean a complete merger or some type of contract,” she said.
Keane pointed to October’s three-way merger between Chicago-based flexible packaging producer Rollprint Packaging Products, Singapore-based Alliantz Flexible Packaging and Ireland-based EuroFoil Teo to form a new global company, Paxxus, as a sign of things to come.

Barry Freda, CEO of New Jersey-based World Wide Packaging, a manufacturing of cosmetics packaging, said the tariffs have altered his strategy. The company now plans to acquire an airless packaging business either in Taiwan or South Korea due to the import tariffs on Chinese goods.
“Tell me what Trump’s going to do and I’ll tell you where we want to be,” he said. “If the tariffs go away, then I want to be in China. If they don’t, then I want to be somewhere else.”
WWP manufactures a large portion of its flexible and rigid packaging in China and generated over USD 200m in revenue in 2018.
Flexible packaging is manufactured using paper, plastic film, foil or a combination of the three. It is used in both consumer and industrial products and includes products such as rollstock, bags, pouches, wraps, shrink sleeves and stretch film.

Fast US growth attracting M&A interest
Tariffs aside, the US flexible packaging industry remains ripe for consolidation owing to the huge number of both independent and private equity-backed companies operating in the space.
“It’s become a very hot area over the last five years and I think quite frankly it needs some M&A,” one industry investment banker said. “There’s no question that folks have done it -- and they’ve made money doing it -- but it needs to happen some more.”
Keane estimates flexible packaging generated almost USD 31bn in revenue in 2017 from 400 companies. The sector accounts for around 80,000 employees with around 70% of these located in the Midwest. As the second largest packaging segment behind corrugated, accounting for 19% of all US packaging, it is also the fastest growing, which in itself is attracting M&A interest.
“M&A will definitely continue,” Keane said. “It used to be the big companies buying the small companies but now we’re seeing the big companies consolidating too.” In August last year for example, Bemis [NYSE:BMS] announced that it would merge with Swiss-Australian packaging group Amcor [ASX:AMC] in a USD 6.8bn all-stock transaction.
Meanwhile, Keane named companies such as printing firm TC Transcontinental [TSE:TCL.A TCL.B], The Carlyle Group-backed Novolexand Ohio-based ProAmpac as likely to continue consolidating the space. She added that M&A will also be driven by packaging firms in other segments looking to get into flexible packaging.
However, the banker noted that the pushback against plastics and consumer and company focus on sustainability could have a negative effect on the space.
“As more people move away from plastics back to paper, I think paper-based packaging, which is recyclable and environmentally friendly is likely to be the biggest beneficiary of that,” the banker said.
Private equity firms wrapping up packaging
Flexible packaging also continues to receive healthy interest from PE firms, Keane said, due to growth opportunities driven by high demand for premium dog and cat food, health foods, and the dairy industry. She named The Carlyle Group as an active player in the space likely to continue acquiring going forward.
According to Scott Finegan, managing director at Chicago-based PE firm Pfingsten Partners, the overall packaging space remains attractive owing to its roll-up potential, high multiples and growth opportunities.
“The packaging area in general is a very stable investment not prone to huge drops during recessions,” he said.
In 2016, Pfingsten acquired Oliver Printing & Packaging together with industry veteran Brian Dunsim. In December, the firm acquired a folding carton and pressure sensitive label supplier, Hauppauge, New York-based Disc Graphics, its second acquisition for the platform. It is seeking additional acquisitions in both pressure sensitive labels and folding cartons, but is also separately looking at flexible packaging for a potential new platform.
“It’s an area of interest with probably higher growth than folding cartons and we’ve been looking in that direction,” Dunsim said.

Barron's : A Top U.K. Income Investment Play

A Top U.K. Income Investment Play

Brexit-related clouds have produced another opportunity for investors: Legal & General .

L&G (tickers: LGEN.UK and LGGNF), which specializes in general (nonlife) insurance, asset management, and mortgages, offers a fat dividend yield at a compelling valuation. “It’s a buy for us,” says Ian Forrest, an analyst at United Kingdom stockbroker The Share Centre. “The yield is the most attractive thing. When you look at the forecasts for the company, it suggests dividends are likely to rise.”

Shares have lagged behind the broader U.K. market over the past quarter. L&G lost 5% in the three months through Thursday, versus a 2.9% fall in the FTSE 100 index of the largest listed U.K. stocks. Both figures exclude dividends.

The main investor concerns include the lack of a final deal for Britain’s exit from the European Union, generalized fear of equities in the midst of the U.S.-China trade spat, and concerns over rising interest rates, particularly in the U.S. Many U.K.-based financial firms such as L&G got hit with all three worries.

Britain’s leaving the EU without a trade deal threatens U.K.-based financial firms such as L&G if they want to continue doing business with Europe. As of Thursday, Britain’s Parliament hadn’t signed off on the agreement nominally made between U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May and Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Union. Nothing is clear yet.

The uncertainty led L&G stock to drop, but that also makes it cheap, and the prices reflect overblown worries. Most deals with the EU get cut at the very last minute. If that happens, investors will pile in again.

Shares trade at a forward price/earnings ratio of 7.6 versus an average of 11 over the past five years, according to Morningstar data. The forward P/E is also well below the 11.2 of the broader U.K. market, according to Yardeni Research. At 7%, the forecast dividend yield exceeds the 4.2% yield on the iShares Core FTSE 100exchange-traded fund (ISF.UK), which tracks the FTSE 100. While the yield seems high, it’s been supported by widening profits. “Dividend cover has improved slightly, and that gives some reassurance,” says Forrest.

The potential for capital gains from the stock adds to the attraction. Morningstar says the stock is worth 2.82 pounds sterling a share ($3.61), about 16% above its recent price of £2.44. Adding in the yield would raise the total return further.

The undervaluation belies a positive outlook. “We expect to have an exceptionally busy H2 [the second half of the year,]” said Nigel Wilson, L&G’s CEO, in a recent earnings statement. “We are confident that Legal & General is strongly positioned for growth in H2 and beyond.”

After adjustments for mortality changes, operating earnings grew 5% in the first half when compared with the same period a year before. Profitability of the firm’s annuity business is affected by customer death rates.

The investment unit fared well in spite of rocky markets, with assets under management growing to £985 billion ($1.3 trillion) versus £951 billion in the same period a year before. That increase was helped meaningfully by a 16% jump in international assets to £229 billion over the same period. The firm says it had positive flows in the U.S., Europe, and Asia.

There are risks. L&G’s efforts to enter the potentially lucrative U.S. market may not pay off. Non-U.S. financial firms historically have had a poor success rate there. And the firm could be the victim of a no-deal U.K. exit from the EU, which could impede its business with continental Europe. Interest-rate concerns have subsided over the past couple of weeks, but worries could reignite quickly.

WSJ : Cold War Games: U.S. Is Preparing to Test the Waters in Icy Arctic

Cold War Games: U.S. Is Preparing to Test the Waters in Icy Arctic
Navy explores expansion of operations in far North, going head-to head with rivals Russia and China

WASHINGTON—The Navy is planning to expand its role in the Arctic as climate change opens up more ocean waterways and the U.S. vies with great-power rivals Russia and China for influence in the far north.

A Navy warship will sail through Arctic waters in coming months on what’s known as a freedom of navigation operation, or FONOP, said Navy Secretary Richard Spencer in an interview with The Wall Street Journal this week. It will be the first time the Navy has conducted such an operation in the Arctic.

The Navy also is planning to station resources in Adak, Alaska, which would mark a return to the onetime World War II and Cold War base that operated from 1942 to 1997, when U.S. troops were withdrawn. The new detachment could include surface ships and P-8 Poseidon patrol and reconnaissance aircraft, he said.

“The concept is, yes, go up there,” Mr. Spencer said, adding that plans for new Arctic operations are in early stages. “We’re developing them as we speak,” he said.

The Arctic has become a markedly more contentious military and commercial environment as the changing climate has led to greater ice melt in the summer, opening more navigable waterways and leading to greater sea traffic in once-impassable lanes.

The National Snow and Ice Data Center found that 2018 saw the third-lowest Arctic ice level since satellite data collection began in the late 1970s, part of an adverse trend the center says threatens to further accelerate global warming and negatively affect climate patterns. This could open up more trans-Arctic maritime routes, according to the Government Accountability Office, allowing exploration of untapped petroleum reserves and threatening the borders of countries once insulated by thick ice off their coasts.
The U.S. and allied militaries have used freedom of navigation operations around the world to assert the rights of ships from the U.S. and elsewhere to operate freely in waterways where there are territorial disputes, hoping to discourage or counter excessive claims. Dozens of such operations in the South China Sea have targeted excessive Chinese maritime claims around islands and outposts across the region.

The Arctic mission will be the first time the U.S. Navy will undertake a FONOP in the Arctic, according to Cmdr. Jereal Dorsey, a Navy spokesman. Mr. Spencer said that the planning hasn’t yet addressed which ports would be visited or which ship will be used.

Russia has long worked to develop its Arctic capabilities because of its lengthy northern coastline and use of Arctic waters for trade and national defense, including establishment of military bases.

China, which has declared itself a near-Arctic power, issued a comprehensive Arctic policy last year that included a desire to build a “polar silk road” and to ensure its freedom to operate in the region.

Adak, which sits at the end of the Aleutian Islands near Russia, once served as a U.S. naval facility and still has a functioning airstrip used for commercial flights. The base was closed in the 1990s as part of the Base Realignment and Closure Program, better known as BRAC.

The decommissioned naval station was taken over in 2003 by the Aleut Corporation, founded in the 1970s to settle Alaska-native claims against the federal government. With only a few thousand acres of the island still under government control, the Navy is currently in talks with the corporation, Mr. Spencer said. The Aleut Corporation didn’t respond to a request for comment on the matter.

“It has some amazing facilities,” Mr. Spencer said. “Could we bring some surface ships there? Yes.”

The Navy’s planning is part of a broader move by the U.S. military to expand its influence in a region it has discounted, according to experts and military officials, and doing so is likely to pose a series of challenges.

Expanded military operations in the far north will require coordination with the Coast Guard, which handles a large portion of search-and-rescue missions and other U.S. surface capabilities in the Arctic. Mr. Spencer hasn’t said whether the Navy plans to move into some of these roles, but has said the Navy will work with the Coast Guard.

The Coast Guard also operates the only U.S. icebreaker in the region, a cause of concern among some lawmakers and defense officials because Russia operates dozens of icebreakers and the Chinese are building a fleet of such vessels. The most recent U.S. defense budget includes authorization for new icebreakers, though the first one won’t be ready for use for years.

Ships that regularly sail in icy waters must be ice-hardened or winterized, to withstand the pounding and stress of thick ice and cold temperatures. The Navy’s current fleet hasn’t been designed to operate in icy waters, the GAO said, but some experts and lawmakers have said the issue will have to be addressed.

The Navy is preparing changes to its official Arctic operations policy to include a broader focus on surface warfare, Mr. Spencer said. Existing policy focuses in large part on the Navy’s submarine and air patrol capabilities—not surface navigation.

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R., Alaska) said in an interview that surface navigation was important to emphasize the U.S. role as an Arctic nation.

“I’ve been pressing them to do something—not just with submarines,” Mr. Sullivan said. “It kind of defeats the purpose if you can’t see it.”

The Navy has moved to expand its footprint in the Arctic region in other ways recently. It launched what officials called the Second Fleet in August to focus on the North Atlantic and on expanding Marine Corps training for extreme cold-weather operations.

Currently, 600 Marines are training in Norway, with that country’s forces, and are preparing for land warfare in Arctic conditions, part of a longstanding commitment to such operations.

The coming Arctic freedom of navigation operation and plans for expanded missions in the far north are planned, in part, to better understand how to work and operate in the extreme cold, Mr. Spencer said.

“We’ve got to get up there and learn,” he said. “There’s no other way to do it.”

WSJ : The Big Hangup: Why the Future Is Not Just Your Phone

The Big Hangup: Why the Future Is Not Just Your Phone
The once-revolutionary smartphone is losing its power to amaze—and maybe its singular hold on our lives

Steve Jobs took to a stage a dozen years ago this week to introduce a revolutionary new product to the world: the first Apple iPhone.

That groundbreaking device, and the competitors that followed, changed the way people communicated, ordered dinner and hailed a taxi. The technology world reoriented around the smartphone, supplanting the personal computer, MP3 players, the digital camera and maps. And the mobile economy was born.

Today, it looks like the era of smartphone supremacy is starting to wane. The devices aren’t going away any time soon, but their grip on the consumer is weakening. A global sales slump and a lack of hit new advancements has underlined a painful reality for the matured industry: smartphones don’t look so singularly smart anymore.

While once smartphones were like a centripetal force sucking up tools from dozens of devices, from flashlights to calculators to game consoles, functions are now flying out of phones and onto other products with their own embedded smart connections. Wristwatches can now text emojis. Televisions can talk and listen. Voice-activated speakers can order diapers.

The number of “connected” devices in use that can stream music, clock mileage or download apps has more than doubled to 14.2 billion in the past three years, according to market researcher Gartner Inc. The total excludes smartphones.

What’s shifted most is the smartphone’s monolithic status as the device that software companies and businesses needed to reach mobile users—and for consumers to access their services. Now the universe has expanded to voice apps, car infotainment centers and wearable devices.

“We may even need another word for whatever the smartphone will become because when ‘smart’ is everywhere that term becomes almost meaningless,” said Wayne Lam, a principal analyst at research firm IHS Markit .

Like the arc of the personal computer, smartphones—now more a need in the modern world than a luxurious splurge—are engaged in a race toward the bottom. The industry’s two titans, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. , risk seeing their high-end phones become commoditized, as Chinese rivals Huawei Technologies Co. and Xiaomi Corp. prove capable of making similar devices at lower prices.

Twelve years after the iPhone’s debut, more than half of the world’s population owns a smartphone. While that leaves billions of potential first-time buyers in countries from Indonesia to Brazil, they reside in poorer areas, offering lower profits. Meanwhile, the market in wealthier countries such as the U.S. has become saturated, as the improvements in the devices become more incremental and many consumers have decided they don’t need to get each new upgrade.

As recently as 2015, annual smartphone shipments grew at a double-digit clip. Those days are over: The industry saw its first declines at the end of 2017 and remained negative all last year. A major driver was China, the world’s largest smartphone market, where annual shipments sank 16%, according to government data.

Apple earlier this month made a rare cut to its quarterly revenue forecast, citing slower-than-expected iPhone sales in China. Samsung followed with a warning of its own, telling investors its fourth-quarter operating profit would decline 29%. The South Korean company feels the smartphone strain doubly, as a handset maker and a components supplier to many rivals, including Apple.

Cao Yuqian, a 24-year-old student in Shanghai, had long made a habit of buying a new phone every year—her iPhone 8 Plus is her 10th Apple device. But this year, she’s in no rush to upgrade because leaping to the next generation of iPhones would mean losing the physical home button on the front of the device.

And there’s another reason. “Now it’s a bit pricey,” Ms. Cao said.

Apple Chief Tim Cook this past week stressed that the company’s product pipeline is strong and touted the success it has had beyond the iPhone, selling wearables such as its AirPod wireless headphones and the Apple Watch.

The picture is different in India, where fewer than one in four people own a smartphone and its user base is growing faster than any other country. But the average price for a smartphone there is about $160, or half of what most of the world typically spends, IDC says.

In developed markets, smartphone usage may be reaching its upper limits, as some consumers pull back amid the tech industry’s acknowledgment their products can be addictive, spur anxiety, distract drivers and cast a pall of silence over the dinner table.

Apple and Facebook Inc., for instance, have created systems that track users’ screen time and notify them when they’ve reached preset limits.

Brian McElhaney, 32, an actor, writer and director in New York, became so concerned with his smartphone usage that last year he ditched his iPhone for a $35 flip phone. He only reaches for his deactivated smartphone at night—on his home Wi-Fi—when he needs to access social media apps to post work content and says he can go days without touching it.

“I went whole hog into this technology without really knowing what it was going to do to me,” Mr. McElhaney said of smartphones.

More than a third of consumers look at their smartphones within five minutes of waking up and about 20% said they check their phone more than 50 times a day, a Deloitte survey of 53,000 people in countries around the world found.

Americans on average spend two hours and 33 minutes daily looking at their smartphones in 2019, some 7% more than the prior year, according to eMarketer, which said the rate of growth has slowed from previous years.

When Mr. Jobs, then Apple’s chief executive, introduced the iPhone from a stage at the Macworld expo in San Francisco in 2007, the crowd burst out clapping the first time he showed them how the phone could be unlocked by swiping a finger across the screen. When he used his finger to scroll through the music on the phone, they cheered.

For years afterward, phone makers would routinely amaze consumers with new advancements, from selfie cameras to waterproof designs to plus-size screens. The early flourishes, though, have more than satiated a wide swath of consumers who aren’t lured by wireless charging or augmented reality.

As advances became more incremental, Apple and Samsung saw their once-sizable gaps narrow with lower-cost Chinese rivals like Huawei, Xiaomi and BBK Electronics Corp.’s Oppo. Chinese vendors now make the majority of the world’s phones—crossing that threshold for the first time last year, according to Canalys, a market researcher.

The handset industry is hopeful the forthcoming next-generation 5G networks, which could be 100 times faster in speed, will unlock new uses for the smartphone and entice people to upgrade en masse. Some of those planned changes include better syncing with cars, kitchen appliances and home electronics.

“I don’t think we’ve hit peak utility for the smartphone. I think it continues to grow in importance in our lives,” said John Foster, CEO of Aiqudo, a platform that creates voice-enabled commands for mobile apps.

While the earliest 5G-compatible smartphones are expected to be released to U.S. consumers early this year, carriers are still in the process of upgrading their networks. There will likely be pockets of service in the U.S. in 2019, but widespread network buildout and adoption by consumers and businesses is likely to take years.

Smart-home devices from speakers to home assistants to connected refrigerators offer the ability to relay the weather or guide consumers through recipes, tasks that until recently had fallen to smartphones.

Michael Woods, a 32-year-old federal government attorney in Washington, D.C., said his New Year’s resolution is to reduce his screen time, something his two Amazon Echos and Google Home hub help him with. “Not because I want to get rid of my phone, but just because I want to be more present,” he said.

The breadth of connected gadgets has made it harder to unplug. But the more nascent additions tug on people’s attention differently than smartphones, a potential allure for people irritated by the flurry of notifications from their phones, said Kai Lukoff, a University of Washington researcher studying problematic smartphone use. “With a smart speaker, it only responds to requests I make of it,” Mr. Lukoff said.
A growing number of children have smartphones and new younger users contributed to Verizon Communications Inc.’s larger-than-expected subscriber growth in the fourth quarter, the carrier said last week. But those devices are no longer the only avenue to private social interaction for children and tweens, many of whom now enjoy their own tablets and gaming systems complete with headsets that allow them to talk regularly with friends without a phone.

Device makers will have to prove that they can emerge from what some consumers see as years of marginal improvements in camera, battery and security functionality.

Rick Berkowitz, a 65-year-old in St. Louis, uses his new iPhone XR to monitor stocks, cast yoga videos onto his TV and FaceTime his grandchildren. But the features, other than unlocking his device with facial recognition, leave him unimpressed.

“I personally believe that all these phones have pretty much reached their zenith just like the PCs did,” said Mr. Berkowitz, who runs his own hedge fund.

The challenge tech companies, wireless carriers and device makers now face is birthing the next society-shifting technology.

“What’s not going to go away: the need to have a device that’s constantly with you, to remote control your life. At the moment, we call that the smartphone,” said Jaede Tan, a regional director at App Annie, which tracks smartphone behavior. “Does it become smaller, sit on your wrist, a chip in the back of your mouth? Maybe. The concept needs to remain constant.”

WSJ : This Really Is the Next Revolution in TV Technology

This Really Is the Next Revolution in TV Technology
MicroLED is better looking, more efficient and more versatile than any previous display tech. Now all Samsung, Sony, LG and others have to do is figure out how to manufacture it affordably

LAS VEGAS—One of the most exciting things I’ve seen at this year’s CES tech show was a man putting a TV together. It looked more like he was hanging photos. He’d grab square tiles off a pile, attach them to the wall, then screw a small plate up top. A moment later, the surface would spring to life. He’d attach another, and it would extend the picture. He built a TV one tile at a time, and it looked awesome.

This particular set was a prototype of a new Samsung modular TV project. At CES, the company displayed screens as small as a magazine cover and as large as 219 inches—which it called, aptly enough, The Wall. Samsung’s goal is to let customers choose the exact size and shape of their own TV, assembled like Lego bricks.

You won’t be able to buy The Wall for a while—and even then it’ll likely only be affordable to people who already own several yachts—but in the meantime, Samsung intends to sell a 75-inch 4K TV based on the same technology. It’s called MicroLED, and it’s worth knowing about now, because it’s the biggest change coming to screens in a long time.

Painting the Picture
For years, LCD (aka liquid crystal display) has been the dominant TV tech. But LCD has a downside: Its pixels basically sit in a sheet of glass, and can’t be seen well unless there’s a big light—or many little lights—shining through it. Without the light, your TV would look more like an Amazon Kindle. Backlighting, though, means dark colors can only be so dark.

You won’t be able to buy The Wall for a while—and even then it’ll likely only be affordable to people who already own several yachts—but in the meantime, Samsung intends to sell a 75-inch 4K TV based on the same technology. It’s called MicroLED, and it’s worth knowing about now, because it’s the biggest change coming to screens in a long time.

Painting the Picture
For years, LCD (aka liquid crystal display) has been the dominant TV tech. But LCD has a downside: Its pixels basically sit in a sheet of glass, and can’t be seen well unless there’s a big light—or many little lights—shining through it. Without the light, your TV would look more like an Amazon Kindle. Backlighting, though, means dark colors can only be so dark.

“MicroLEDs are the most interesting and exciting new display technology since the launch of OLED display products beginning in 2010,” said Ray Soneira, chief executive of DisplayMate, a display-technology research company.

Make It So
Samsung may have had the largest MicroLED display at CES—and may be hitting the market soonest with the first living-room-targeted set—but many other companies are working with the technology. TV giants LG and Sony have shown off MicroLED displays of their own. In 2014, Apple acquired a company called LuxVue that was also working on MicroLED displays.

In some ways, the tech may be even better for smaller screens like phones or smartwatches, or future devices like VR headsets and AR glasses. Your phone’s display accounts for a huge amount of its battery drain. Who wouldn’t want a screen that uses less power, looks better and can change its shape and size?

Your MicroLED TV is a long way off. “A very high proportion of displays using MicroLEDs will not happen in the next few years,” said Jamie Fox, an analyst with research firm IHS Markit . “It is still quite early in the progress of this technology.” As much as anything, it’s a manufacturing challenge: Your Samsung Wall would require careful placement of millions of tiny sub-pixels, each smaller than a human hair. That’s expensive, difficult and slow, three words nobody likes coming off the factory line.

Still, MicroLED is the display technology to watch in the coming years. When MicroLED manufacturing ramps up, and costs go down, the idea of dotting every surface with pixels won’t sound crazy. William Shakespeare famously wrote, “All the world’s a stage.” More likely, someday not too far off, all the world will be a screen.

>>> US Stocks Close Mixed ahead of Earnings Se


Closing Market Summary: Stocks Close Mixed ahead of Earnings Season

The S&P 500 (-0.01%) finished just a hair below its flat line on Friday. The benchmark index never traded in positive territory but did close at its session high. It also finished the week with a gain of 2.5%.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (unch), the Nasdaq Composite (-0.2%), and the Russell 2000 (+0.1%) closed mixed, finishing with weekly gains of 2.4%, 3.5%, and 4.8%, respectively.

The S&P 500 sectors also finished mixed with energy (-0.6%), utilities (-0.4%), and materials (-0.4%) weighing on the broader market. Conversely, the consumer staples (+0.3%) and health care (+0.3%) sectors finished atop the standings.

The benchmark index came into the session up 10.4% from its Christmas Eve low, suggesting to many that the broader market had gotten overbought on a short-term basis and was due for a pullback. The S&P 500 was down 0.7% in the early going with weakness presumably being a function of profit-taking as opposed to any news-driven catalyst.

In addition, given the number of earnings warnings already announced this week, and with earnings season set to kick off next week, some took this as another reason to take some profits. Nevertheless, some buying interest throughout the session slowly recouped the broader market's losses. 

General Motors (GM 37.18, +2.45) for its part jumped 7.1% after it increased its adjusted fiscal 2018 and 2019 earnings above consensus. Its strength, however, was not enough to lift the consumer discretionary space (unch).

The lack of a distinctly positive reaction in the market to GM's upbeat earnings news, in light of the market overcoming prior earnings warnings this week, was reflective of a tired market preferring to take a breather. 

U.S. Treasuries closed out the week on a higher note, pushing the 2-yr yield down two basis points to 2.55% and the 10-yr yield down three basis points to 2.70% in the wake of a market-friendly consumer inflation report. The U.S. Dollar Index gained 0.1% to 95.67. WTI crude, meanwhile, snapped its nine-day winning streak, losing 1.9% to $51.68/bbl.

Reviewing the Consumer Price Index for December, which was the only economic report released on Friday:

  • The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for December was right in-line with the consensus estimates that called for a 0.1% month-over-month decline in total CPI and a 0.2% increase in core CPI, which excludes food and energy.
    • The key takeaway from the report is that it supports the Fed's born-again belief that it can be patient with its policy approach given that the core inflation trend is stable around the longer-run target at a time when data here and abroad is revealing some softening in economic activity.

Investors will not receive any notable economic data on Monday.

  • Russell 2000 +7.3% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite +5.1% YTD
  • S&P 500 +3.6% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +2.9% YTD


Click here to read the full comment.

Portfolio Ticker Matches:  WRAPX



This email was sent to you at: sgva@bloomberg.net. To ensure delivery to your Inbox and have images displayed properly, please add update@briefing.com to your Address Book or Safe Sender List.

Briefing.com sends these emails based on the preferences you set for your account. If you no longer wish to receive this email, unsubscribe here. To edit your email preferences, click here. Read our Privacy Statement and Cookie Policy if you have any questions.

Briefing.com offers a wide range of premium services. Free trial requests can be made via our institutional sales or customer service departments.

401 N. Michigan Avenue Suite 1910 Chicago, IL 60611 | 800-752-3013

Copyright © 2019 Briefing.com, Inc. All rights reserved.

Available on the App Store  Get it on Google Play

FT : AB InBev: no mugs

AB InBev: no mugs
IPO of Asian business will help the brewer deal with its bloated balance sheet

Beer drinkers are maligned as overweight guzzlers. In the case of AB InBev, the brewer needs to shed some weight. A balance sheet has been bloated with successive acquisitions. Debt ballooned to €100bn. AB InBev’s market value has waddled downhill ever since the October 2016 SABMiller deal. A change of diet is prescribed, more equity and less debt.

On Friday, reports surfaced that AB InBev could list its Asian business. This region has proven that the brewer’s premiumisation strategy can work well. China has the world’s largest beer market. Introducing SAB brands such as Budweiser and Corona into the Chinese market has meant operating margins for the group in Asia should exceed 27 per cent in 2018, according to Bernstein estimates, double that of three years ago. Chinese beer makers, such as China Resources Beer, Beijing Yanjing and Tsingtao, manage less than a third of that.

As such if AB InBev did list its Asian unit, its valuation should exceed its domestic rivals. Initial reports of a $70bn (€60bn) valuation appear frothy, though. Using analyst estimates of its Asian ebitda (a cash flow proxy), and a multiple of 14 times, comfortably above those of domestic rivals, produces a value of €40bn.

That sounds a big number, a third of its market capitalisation. No wonder its shares jumped after the news. But how much equity is raised matters most to shareholders warily eyeing a net debt to ebitda ratio pushing 5 times. Whatever the amount — perhaps $10bn — that is peanuts compared with its debt load. Moreover, AB InBev will soon have to deal with the entry of Heineken to China this year. The Dutch brewer bought a large minority stake in CR Beer last year.

AB InBev is a heavyweight. Its well-received bond issuance, lengthening maturities not adding to the load, underscores this. Annual free cash flow of over €10bn (before dividends) still means it will need years to trim its balance sheet. An Asian IPO can help accelerate this process.