FT : G7 rejects Russian demand for energy payments in roubles

G7 rejects Russian demand for energy payments in roubles
Putin’s call for oil and gas deals to be paid in Russian currency would ‘violate contracts’, German energy minister says

Energy ministers of the G7 group of major economies rejected Vladimir Putin’s demand on Monday that Russian gas should be paid for in roubles in a stand-off that is raising new doubts about the fuel’s supply to Europe.

The officials unanimously rejected the Russian president’s calls for “unfriendly” countries to pay for gas imports in roubles instead of currencies such as euros and dollars, Robert Habeck, Germany’s economics and energy minister, told journalists on Monday in Berlin.

The statement raised the possibility of gas supplies to Europe being cut off should the two sides be unable to agree on a payment currency. Habeck said G7 countries were “prepared” for “all scenarios”, including a potential halt to Russian energy supplies.

Putin announced last week that Moscow would begin to invoice European gas buyers in roubles, Russia’s latest response to unprecedented western sanctions imposed in a bid to punish him for the invasion of Ukraine.

Habeck — who was speaking after a virtual meeting with ministers from the US, UK, France, Japan, Italy and Canada — said: “All G7 ministers totally agreed that [requiring payment in roubles] would be a clear and unilateral violation of existing contracts.”

Western companies typically agree long-term supply agreements for Russian gas imports and it remains unclear how Moscow will try to implement any change in payment currency. Analysts said most agreements were negotiated in international currencies and it was unlikely they contained clauses to allow for payments in roubles.

European importers of natural gas, including France’s Engie and Austria’s OMV, have said that supply contracts do not include clauses that allow for payment in roubles. They said they intend to continue paying in euros or dollars as specified in their existing deals.

Habeck said Putin’s move to bill Russian energy in roubles showed that he “has his back to the wall” because sanctions were seriously harming the Russian economy.

Laurent Ruseckas, executive director of gas in Europe, Middle East and Africa at S&P Global, said the EU and Russia were engaged in brinkmanship over the flow of gas supplies. If the EU were to introduce a law against paying in roubles, then “either someone blinks, or you go into force majeure”, meaning gas supplies to Europe would be cut off.

If Russian law mandates payment in roubles, state-owned companies such as Gazprom — Russia’s biggest gas supplier — would have to initiate discussions on modifying contracts. That would create a chance for European utilities to seek to renegotiate contract lengths and supply volumes, industry executives say.

Ruseckas said Russia appeared to be adopting an “orderly” approach to switching the payment currency for gas purchased by “unfriendly” countries, even though few signs were emerging of buyers being ready to comply without any concessions.

Officials from Gazprom, the government and the central bank will report to Putin on Thursday on how to implement plans to convert payments into roubles, according to Interfax.

European gas prices were relatively steady on Monday with Front-month futures contracts tied to TTF, Europe’s wholesale gas price, rising as much as 10 per cent to €109 per megawatt hour, before easing back.

Analysts said prices would probably have dropped without the uncertainty over payment terms because Europe had significantly replenished its gas storage levels over the weekend, lifting them to almost double the low they hit in 2018.

The EU has avoided sanctioning energy imports from Russia directly. However, European energy buyers could struggle to find a bank compliant with sanctions to convert euros to roubles. The EU could also respond with its own sanctions to prevent exchanges of euros into roubles.

Germany unveiled targets last week to cut dependence on Russian energy rapidly, vowing to all but wean itself off the country’s gas by mid-2024 and become “virtually independent” of its oil by the end of this year.

WSJ : Biden’s Budget Calls for Increase in Defense Spending, Including Funds for

Biden’s Budget Calls for Increase in Defense Spending, Including Funds for Ukraine
Spending proposal also emphasizes efforts to reduce deficit and fund law enforcement

WASHINGTON—President Biden on Monday released a $5.8 trillion budget that envisions a substantial increase in U.S. defense spending, a sign of the administration’s willingness to devote additional resources to military programs, including aiding Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression.

The Biden administration is seeking $813 billion for military spending in fiscal year 2023, which begins Oct. 1, a roughly 4% increase from the $782 billion enacted for this fiscal year.

The requested increase is more than double than the 1.6% boost the administration sought for military spending in last year’s budget. The proposal calls for $682 million in funding to go to Ukraine for efforts to counter Russia and shore up its security and economic interests.

Mr. Biden’s budget also emphasizes efforts to reduce the deficit and increase law-enforcement spending at the Justice Department. The budget overall is a departure from last year’s request outlining a massive boost in spending on domestic programs and detailed financial blueprint for Mr. Biden’s sweeping education, social and climate-change agenda. In Monday’s proposal, the White House largely glosses over that agenda, which has stalled in Congress.

The shift comes after Russia invaded Ukraine, Mr. Biden’s standing in opinion polls has fallen and Democratic hopes of passing a sweeping economic package have dimmed.

“I’m calling for one of the largest investments in our national security in history, with the funds needed to ensure that our military remains the best-prepared, best-trained, best-equipped military in the world,” Mr. Biden said in a statement. “In addition, I’m calling for continued investment to forcefully respond to Putin’s aggression against Ukraine with U.S. support for Ukraine’s economic, humanitarian, and security needs.”

The budget also includes $17.4 billion for law enforcement at the Justice Department, including $1.7 billion for efforts to combat gun trafficking, and provides funding for the U.S. Marshals and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to address violent crime.

The budget outlines the administration’s policy priorities, but Congress will have final approval over many of its funding requests, while a large chunk of federal spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security happen automatically every year.

The request will face the same political headwinds on Capitol Hill that have helped define Mr. Biden’s first year in office. Democrats have very narrow control of the House and 50-50 Senate, and Republicans have lined up against many of the Biden administration’s proposals. Democrats are bracing to lose control of either or both chambers of Congress in the fall’s midterm elections.

The proposed military spending level would be the largest ever, if enacted, but it wouldn’t be the biggest one-year increase when compared with some previous years during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The larger budget comes after the U.S. ended its 20-year war in Afghanistan in August, but now scrambles to address the crisis in Europe.

U.S. military spending also will likely require additional long-term investments, particularly in the Navy, to stay focused on China as the larger, more strategic threat facing the U.S. U.S. officials say investments in hypersonic missiles, machine learning, artificial intelligence and other military capabilities appropriate for confronting China will require billions of dollars in new investments over time.

Biden administration officials said the 2023 budget emphasizes deficit reduction, aligning with a recent push on the issue.

The administration forecasts a yearly drop of roughly 50% in the U.S. deficit during fiscal 2022, to $1.4 trillion. Under that scenario, the deficit as a percentage of U.S. gross domestic product would fall to 5.8% in fiscal 2022 from 12.4% in fiscal 2021, the budget estimates.

The government so far in fiscal 2022 is running a $476 billion deficit, a 55% reduction from the same point in the prior fiscal year, as spending on Covid-19 relief programs wanes and a stronger economy generates more tax revenue.

Debt held by the public would fall to 101.8% of U.S. GDP in fiscal 2023, compared with the White House’s forecast of 102.4% in the current year. Debt is expected to rise in subsequent years to 106.7% of GDP by 2032. Broadly, the 2023 budget sees debt rising more gradually over time than last year’s proposal.

The budget includes a proposal for a 20% minimum tax rate on income, including unrealized gains in assets, for American households worth more than $100 million. This would apply to the top 0.01% of households, the White House said. That is likely under 20,000 households.

Under the proposal, households worth more than $100 million that don’t pay at least 20% in tax on a combination of their standard reported income and their gains on unsold assets such as stocks would owe additional tax until they have paid the new minimum 20%, according to the White House.

Under current law, capital gains are taxed only when they are realized—when assets are sold—and long-term gains are taxed at lower rates than ordinary income. The White House said that over the next decade the new tax would lower the U.S. deficit by about $360 billion and that the budget plan overall would reduce it by more than $1 trillion.

The tax, which is unlikely to advance in Congress, could have its biggest impact on billionaires such as Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg, whose fortunes are largely composed of unrealized capital gains in the companies that they founded. Using the broader definition of income proposed by the administration, it is possible that they would pay less than 20% and owe the new tax.

Other people might have enough wealth to potentially be subject to the tax but not pay it. That could happen for athletes, entertainers and executives who pay high income-tax rates on their annual earnings. That might also be the case for wealthy people who have recently inherited money and don’t have significant unrealized capital gains.

The administration’s budget proposal sidesteps questions about Mr. Biden’s efforts on a broad climate, education and healthcare package that Democrats have tried—and so far failed—to advance through Congress. Democrats are still in the early stages of figuring out how to resurrect the package in a way that can win the support of centrists such as Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.), who scuttled the House version of the legislation in the 50-50 Senate.

Rather than lay out possible ways to overhaul the legislation, the White House budget broadly reiterates the Biden administration’s goals for the bill, listing a series of policy ideas—including free community college—that died during talks among Democrats last year.

Administration officials said they had segmented ideas related to the economic bill away from the broader budget to give space for Democrats on Capitol Hill to continue talking. While the White House has sought to craft the economic bill such that it reduces the deficit, the budget assumes it will have no impact on the deficit.

“We’ve been clear that the president wants to sign legislation that cuts costs for families and reduces the deficit, but to be conservative the budget” assumes it won’t impact the deficit, said Shalanda Young, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.

The White House said Monday it expects inflation, which is trending at four-decade highs, to begin to ease.

The budget projects a sharp drop in the consumer-price index both in the current year and next. The index, which measures what Americans are paying for everyday items, rose at an annual rate of 7.9% in February. The budget projects the index will rise 4.7% in calendar year 2022 and 2.3% in 2023. Cecilia Rouse, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, noted that the projections were completed in November, before the start of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The situation in Ukraine “will have ramifications that are not reflected in our forecast,” Ms. Rouse said. “The invasion will likely put upward pressure on energy and food prices. That in turn could reinforce inflation that was already an issue prior to the invasion,” she added.

The budget forecasts annual U.S. GDP growth of 3.8% in 2022 and 2.5% in 2023, measured on a fourth-quarter and inflation-adjusted basis. That is a rosier outlook than that of the Federal Reserve, which most recently projected annual GDP growth of 2.8% and 2.2% in 2022 and 2023, respectively.

FT : US lawmakers ask Credit Suisse about compliance with Russian oligarch sanct

US lawmakers ask Credit Suisse about compliance with Russian oligarch sanctions
Request comes after bank asked investors to destroy documents related to wealthiest clients’ assets

US lawmakers have requested that Credit Suisse share details on its handling of sanctions against Russian oligarchs after the bank asked investors to destroy documents related to assets of its wealthiest clients.

Carolyn Maloney, chair of the US congressional committee on oversight and reform, and Stephen Lynch, a member of the committee, asked Thomas Gottstein, Credit Suisse chief executive, in a letter dated March 28 to share information in connection with a Financial Times report that the bank had asked investors to destroy documents related to its richest clients’ private jets and yachts.

The move was intended to stop details from leaking about a Credit Suisse division that has made loans to oligarchs who were later sanctioned.

The FT report “raises significant concerns about Credit Suisse’s compliance” with sanctions imposed by the US and its allies in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the letter stated.

The committee was “particularly concerned” that the Swiss bank’s request to destroy documents coincided with Switzerland’s announcement it would join the US, EU and others in imposing sanctions on Moscow in response to its invasion of Ukraine, according to the letter, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.

Hedge funds and other investors earlier this month received letters from Credit Suisse requesting they destroy documents linked to a securitisation of loans backed by “jets, yachts, real estate and/or financial assets”.

They were also asked to “destroy and permanently erase” any confidential information Credit Suisse previously provided in relation to the transaction, citing a “recent data leak to the media” that it said had been “verified by our investigators”.

The timing and nature of Credit Suisse’s requests raised “significant concerns that it may be concealing information about whether participants in the securitisation deal” — including Credit Suisse, investors and owners of underlying assets — “may be evading sanctions” linked to the conflict in Ukraine, the letter said.

US lawmakers have asked Credit Suisse to produce information dating back to January 2017, including a list of all participating investors in the securitisation deal; communications linked to the storage, destruction or holding of confidential information about loans backed by yachts and private jets; and know-your-customer and due diligence documents related to loans securitised as part of the transaction. The letter asked the bank to submit the material by April 11.

Credit Suisse’s move came after the FT reported how the bank offloaded risks relating to $2bn of loans to a group of hedge funds. The FT report quoted extensively from the transaction’s investor presentation, which lifted the lid on closely guarded business secrets of the bank’s international wealth management franchise.

One slide said a third of the defaults on its yacht and aircraft loans in 2017 and 2018 were “related to US sanctions against Russian oligarchs”. Press reports at the time indicated Oleg Deripaska and brothers Arkady and Boris Rotenberg terminated private jet leases with the bank in those years.

Credit Suisse declined to comment on the letter and directed the FT to a previous statement it made about the investor presentation.

“No data, client-related or otherwise, has been erased within Credit Suisse and, for clarity, this is in no way linked to the recent implementation of additional sanctions — with which we are fully compliant,” the statement said.

The bank is also under investigation by Switzerland’s attorney-general over the investor presentation, following a complaint filed by Swiss politician Carlo Sommaruga this month.

A person close to the bank said the complaint was based on a misunderstanding of the presentation and a misinterpretation of the FT article.

FT : Floating LNG: lack of vessels could stymie a good option for Europe

Floating LNG: lack of vessels could stymie a good option for Europe
Getting hold of niche vessels would be tricky, and supply of the ships will not improve right away

US president Joe Biden’s promise to deliver more liquefied natural gas to Europe will be welcomed in continental capitals. But getting the gas into energy short Germany could be tricky thanks to a dearth of floating terminals to turn that LNG back into gas.

America can offer a virtual gas pipeline to Europe, using specialist LNG tankers. Its export capacity is fairly full but Biden still promised to find 15bn cubic metres for its European allies. Some of that will be diverted from Asian spot cargo routes already offering record-high prices. Though that only replaces less than a tenth of Russia’s supply, everything helps.

Germany, which has no regasification terminals open yet, wants to use floating terminals to receive LNG offshore, turn the fuel into gas and transfer it on to onshore networks. Floating storage and regasification units (FSRU) can be set up in under a year, if you can find them.


France, on Monday, also announced plans for floating terminals. For good reason. Building a regasification terminal can take four years, points out Rystad Energy, never mind any Nimbyism.

Each FSRU has about a quarter of the capacity of bigger onshore plants taking in perhaps 20mn tonnes (27bn cubic metres) of LNG. But the time advantage makes renting these for probably $140,000 daily worthwhile over a few years.

Getting hold of these FSRUs is another story. Only 33 of these vessels exist worldwide, according to VesselsValue, most of them built since 2014. Worse, with no new orders currently recorded, supply will not improve soon.


That means certain Asian shipyards, and current FSRU owners, could do well in the next couple of years. Korean shipbuilders — Hyundai, Samsung and Daewoo — dominate construction of FSRUs which cost up to $350mn to build from scratch over two plus years.

Among owners, Norway’s BW Gas, Hoegh LNG and New Fortress Energy control over half the fleet, almost all of which are already chartered. US listed shares of the related Hoegh LNG Partners and New Fortress Energy have recently surged. Another, Excelerate Energy, plans to hold an initial public offering.

Just finding new sources of natural gas for Europe looks hard enough. But getting the molecules where they are most needed could require a lot more of these niche floating LNG vessels.

WSJ : Roman Abramovich and Ukrainian Peace Negotiators Suffer Symptoms of Suspec

Roman Abramovich and Ukrainian Peace Negotiators Suffer Symptoms of Suspected Poisoning
The Russian oligarch and others developed symptoms they blamed on hard-liners in Moscow who they say want to sabotage talks to end the war

Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich and Ukrainian peace negotiators suffered symptoms of suspected poisoning after a meeting in Kyiv earlier this month, people familiar with the matter said.

Following the meeting in the Ukrainian capital, Mr. Abramovich, who has shuttled among Moscow, Lviv and other negotiating venues, as well as at least two senior members of the Ukrainian team developed symptoms that included red eyes, constant and painful tearing, and peeling skin on their faces and hands, the people said.

They blamed the suspected attack on hard-liners in Moscow who they said wanted to sabotage talks to end the war. A person close to Mr. Abramovich said it wasn’t clear who had targeted the group.

Mr. Abramovich and the Ukrainian negotiators, who include Crimean Tatar lawmaker Rustem Umerov, have since improved and their lives aren’t in danger, the people said. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who has met with Mr. Abramovich, wasn’t affected, they said. Mr. Zelensky’s spokesman said he had no information about any suspected poisoning.

Western experts who looked into the incident said it was hard to determine whether the symptoms were caused by a chemical or biological agent or by some sort of electromagnetic-radiation attack, according to the people familiar. 9i,.89z

FT : Middle East ministers hold talks in Israel on ‘common enemies’

Middle East ministers hold talks in Israel on ‘common enemies’
First meeting in the country signals willingness to co-ordinate over regional security threats


Foreign ministers from across the Middle East have met for a summit in the Negev desert, the first such meeting to take place on Israeli soil, as they try to co-ordinate their response to regional security threats including Iran.

US secretary of state Antony Blinken is also attending the summit, alongside Israel’s Yair Lapid, the UAE’s Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sameh Shoukry of Egypt, Nasser Bourita from Morocco and Bahrain’s Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani — all countries that have established diplomatic ties with Israel.

Lapid on Monday said that the purpose of the Negev summit was to build a “new regional architecture” whose shared capabilities “intimidates and deters our common enemies — first and foremost Iran and its proxies”.

Israeli officials oppose the possible revival of a nuclear agreement with Iran. The US Biden administration has been holding indirect talks in Vienna, mediated by the EU, with Iran for 12 months in the hope of securing an agreement that would lead to Iran drastically reducing its nuclear activity. In return, the US would rejoin the accord and lift many sanctions on the Islamic republic. Gulf states such as the UAE, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia also worry that any revival of the nuclear deal will embolden Iran and its proxies.

“The momentum for this emerging regional bloc is due to the progress of the Vienna talks, which has fuelled common concerns over the prospect of an increasingly confident and wealthy Iran, free of sanctions, increasingly activating its offensive capabilities,” said Yaakov Lappin, a defence analyst. “Blinken’s presence provides an opportunity for this bloc to share concerns and co-ordinate responses with the US to these future scenarios.”

On Sunday, a senior US official warned that a deal to save the nuclear accord with Iran was neither imminent nor inevitable as diplomatic efforts stalled over Tehran’s demand that Washington removes a terrorist designation on the elite Revolutionary Guards.

The Negev summit was hastily arranged late last week after Blinken’s visit to Israel was already confirmed. The UAE, Bahrain and Morocco normalised relations with Israel in 2020; Egypt struck a peace deal with Israel in 1979.

Over the weekend, two Israeli police officers were killed by gun-wielding assailants in the northern city of Hadera. Four Israeli civilians were killed last Tuesday in the city of Be’er Sheva in a combined car-ramming and knife attack. Officials have attributed both events to Palestinian citizens of Israel with known ties to Isis.

The Israeli military announced an increase in its troop presence in the West Bank, while the country’s police and public have shifted to a heightened state of alert.

Israel has been warning for several weeks of the risk of violence escalating during April, with the Muslim holiday of Ramadan and the Jewish festival of Passover taking place at the same time. Ramadan, set to begin this weekend, has historically been a time of heightened religious tensions, especially in Jerusalem and its holy sites. 

FT : UniCredit shareholders urged to vote against Orcel pay

UniCredit shareholders urged to vote against Orcel pay
Proxy adviser Glass Lewis says that Italian bank’s remuneration policy is not aligned with investors’ interests

Influential proxy adviser Glass Lewis has recommended investors reject UniCredit’s remuneration policy next week, as chief executive Andrea Orcel’s pay is set to be a divisive issue at the Italian bank’s shareholder meeting for the second year running.

Orcel received €6.7mn in pay last year, including a €5mn sign-on bonus that was not tied to performance, making him one of the best-paid bank executives in Europe. His package this year includes a €2.5mn salary, as well as a potential €5mn short-term performance related bonus and longer-term incentives.

“Glass Lewis does not believe that the company’s remuneration strategy, as currently constituted, is sufficiently aligned with shareholders’ best interests,” the proxy adviser said in its report ahead of UniCredit’s AGM on April 8. “As such, we do not believe that this proposal merits shareholder support.”

The adviser added that its concerns were “magnified” by the more than doubling of Orcel’s potential severance entitlements, from €7.2mn to €15mn. “While we recognise that €15mn is set as a cap on potential entitlements, we find this quantum to be excessive,” it noted.

Fellow proxy adviser ISS, which holds more sway over UniCredit shareholders, gave its qualified support to the company’s policy, though it added: “The problematic CEO pay package approved in 2021 provides for pay outcomes that might be concerning . . . The company has not sufficiently addressed the relatively high level of dissent on the severance proposal at the 2021 AGM.”

Last year, UniCredit narrowly survived a shareholder rebellion after Glass Lewis and ISS both recommended investors reject the company’s pay policy. More than 40 per cent of shareholders did, with the company attracting support from 54 per cent.

Proxy advisers are influential among passive and large institutional investors, which typically follow their recommendations when voting.

Orcel joined UniCredit as chief executive last year, succeeding Frenchman Jean Pierre Mustier, who voluntarily reduced his salary by a quarter in his final year in response to the pandemic and gave up €2.4mn in bonuses.

When Orcel joined he was in the middle of a long-running legal battle with Santander over the Spanish lender’s abortive attempt to hire him as chief executive in 2018.

Orcel won the case in December and was awarded €68mn in compensation, which was reduced by a Madrid judge to €51.4mn in January. Santander is contesting the judgment.

The Italian bank set its remuneration policy after consulting investors who own more than half its shares, according to a person familiar with the matter. This year it made Orcel’s bonus solely tied to performance and added clawback provisions. UniCredit declined to comment.

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls

  • Upgrades:
    • BNY Mellon (BK) upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $58
    • BASF AG (BASFY) upgraded to Buy from Hold at HSBC Securities
    • Deere (DE) upgraded to Neutral from Underweight at JP Morgan; tgt raised to $440
    • Illinois Tool (ITW) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan; tgt lowered to $255
    • KLA Corporation (KLAC) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman; tgt $430
    • The Duckhorn Portfolio (NAPA) upgraded to Outperform from Sector Perform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt $23
  • Downgrades:
    • Advanced Micro (AMD) downgraded to Buy from Conviction Buy at Goldman; tgt $127
    • Adecco S.A. (AHEXY) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at JP Morgan
    • Alliance Data (ADS) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $67
    • Altria (MO) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt $53
    • Beyond Meat (BYND) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at Piper Sandler; tgt lowered to $29
    • Buzzi Unicem SpA (BZZUY) downgraded to Hold from Buy at HSBC Securities
    • Campbell Soup (CPB) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt lowered to $46
    • Citigroup (C) downgraded to Underweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $60
    • Fifth Third (FITB) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $50
    • Foot Locker (FL) downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at Cowen; tgt $34
    • Guild Holdings (GHLD) downgraded to Equal Weight from Overweight at Wells Fargo; tgt $11
    • Honest Company (HNST) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $6.50
    • Heineken (HEINY) downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Barclays
    • ITT (ITT) downgraded to Perform from Outperform at Oppenheimer
    • KB Home (KBH) downgraded to Peer Perform from Outperform at Wolfe Research
    • Kennametal (KMT) downgraded to Underweight from Neutral at JP Morgan; tgt lowered to $31
    • M&T Bank (MTB) downgraded to Underweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $179
    • Microchip (MCHP) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt $79
    • Qorvo (QRVO) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt $138
    • SEI Investments (SEIC) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt lowered to $65
    • Synchrony Financial (SYF) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $40
    • Teradyne (TER) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt $127
    • Trex (TREX) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $81
  • Others:
    • BigBear.ai (BBAI) initiated with an Outperform at Oppenheimer; tgt $10
    • Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP) initiated with a Buy at UBS; tgt $46
    • Globus Medical (GMED) initiated with an Overweight at Wells Fargo; tgt $80
    • NuVasive (NUVA) initiated with an Overweight at Wells Fargo; tgt $58
    • Roblox (RBLX) initiated with an Outperform at Daiwa Securities; tgt $56
    • Toast (TOST) initiated with a Neutral at Credit Suisse; tgt $22
    • Unity Software (U) initiated with an Outperform at Daiwa Securities; tgt $110