WSJ : Tesla Supplier LG Energy Surges on Trading Debut --> +68% on First dqy Trd

Tesla Supplier LG Energy Surges on Trading Debut
South Korean company trails China’s CATL in EV battery production

Shares in LG Energy Solution Ltd. jumped on their first day of trading, after the world’s No. 2 maker of electric-vehicle batteries raised about $10.6 billion in South Korea’s largest-ever initial public offering.

The offering by LG Energy, which supplies batteries to Tesla Inc., General Motors Co. and Hyundai Motor Co., capitalized on investor appetite for key suppliers in the EV industry as well as electric-car makers themselves.

The run-up in LG Energy’s stock Thursday pushed its market value toward $100 billion—defying broader gloom in global equities as the country’s Kospi Composite index traded more than 3% lower.

Despite the broader market volatility, “there are good structural growth trends” supporting LG Energy’s business, said Yoojeong Oh, investment director for Asian equities at Abrdn.

Mr. Oh said its long record as a leading battery producer was also an advantage, with its customer relationships and intellectual property serving as a barrier to entry for newcomers in the market for higher-end EV batteries.

The deal was heavily oversubscribed, with investor orders vastly exceeding the stock on offer. In total, investors sought to buy equivalent of about $12 trillion in stock, filings showed. It was the largest global IPO since U.S. electric-vehicle making startup Rivian Automotive Inc’s blockbuster listing in November, which raised a total of $13.8 billion including a so-called greenshoe option, according to Dealogic.

The company is the industry’s biggest player after China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., or CATL. While CATL largely caters to its home market, its South Korean counterpart has made its dominance in Europe and aggressive U.S. investments a pitch to investors.

LG Energy is likely to benefit from its expansion into Western markets amid geopolitical tensions, said Neil Beveridge, a senior energy analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein.

“Given the decoupling between China and the West, it seems likely we’re going to see the growth in non-Chinese battery makers,” he said. “I think the U.S. market in particular is going to be very important for its growth over the next three to four years.”

By early afternoon Thursday in Seoul, LG Energy shares had gained 63% from their IPO offer price to reach 489,000 South Korean won per share, or the equivalent of about $408.

That lifted the company’s market capitalization to about 114.43 trillion won, or the equivalent of about $95.6 billion, making it South Korea’s second most valuable listed company after Samsung Electronics Co.

CATL, which had a market value of some $215 billion as of Wednesday’s close, had about 29% of the global EV battery market by units sold last year, followed by LG Energy’s 22%, according to SNE Research.

The share sale totaled about 12.75 trillion won, or the equivalent of about $10.6 billion, including some shares sold by parent company LG Chem Ltd. LG Energy will use some of the proceeds it receives to help fund a $5 billion investment program in the U.S., aimed at ramping up production capacity at factories in Michigan and at a joint venture with GM. It will also use some of the money raised to expand in Europe and China, it said in a filing.

LG Energy had planned to go public last year, but postponed the deal after GM recalled about 142,000 Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles that used the South Korean company’s batteries due to the risk of battery fires. GM said it would recover nearly all of the $2 billion cost of the recall from LG Energy. LG Energy was also involved in a separate recall by Hyundai Motor last year.

Those episodes were temporary setbacks but another big recall could damage its brand, said Mr. Beveridge at Bernstein.

WSJ : Samsung’s Fourth-Quarter Revenue Is Best Ever

Samsung’s Fourth-Quarter Revenue Is Best Ever
South Korean tech giant’s fourth-quarter net profits also rise—by 64%

SEOUL— Samsung Electronics Co. capped off a year where it surpassed Intel Corp. to become the world’s No. 1 chip maker as it logged its biggest-ever quarterly revenue.

The semiconductor industry cashed in on a supply-crunch set off by the pandemic that wreaked havoc across global businesses, hampering production of everything from autos to refrigerators to smartphones. Demand exceeded supply throughout the past year, handing greater pricing power to chip companies such as Samsung and Intel.

The South Korean tech company’s fourth-quarter results reflect the more favorable times. Net profit rose 64% to 10.84 trillion won, or the equivalent of about $9 billion, versus 6.6 trillion won a year earlier. The firm’s semiconductor division was the driver.

Based in Suwon, the company reported record sales of 76.57 trillion won for the quarter ended Dec. 31. That compares with 61.6 trillion won a year earlier.

Samsung’s performance slightly topped market expectations. Analysts polled by S&P Global Market Intelligence on average expected 10.7 trillion won in net profit and 75.5 trillion won in sales.

Samsung, the world’s largest maker of smartphones and televisions, is considered a tech-industry bellwether, as a major electronics manufacturer and components supplier to companies such as Apple Inc. and Sony Group Corp.

For the full year, Samsung’s net profit rose 51% to 39.9 trillion won, while revenue grew by 18% to 279.6 trillion won.

Samsung’s standing as the top chip maker by revenue comes as the semiconductor industry embarks on a spending spree to crank out more advanced chips and to expand capacity. Intel specializes in microprocessor chips that go into PCs and servers. , had been No. 1 for nearly all of the past three decades, ceding the spot to Samsung only in 2017 and 2018 when memory-chip prices surged.

But last year proved particularly lucrative for Samsung’s business in memory chips, which have seen prices jump and are more ubiquitous across the digital world than Intel’s microprocessors. The South Korean firm’s semiconductor revenue for 2021 rose 29% year-over-year to 94.16 trillion won, or $78.4 billion.

That was enough to propel Samsung to the chip industry’s No. 1 by sales, according to Gartner Inc., a tech market researcher.

Samsung’s robust performance comes on the heels of a major shake-up inside South Korea’s largest tech company. Last month, the company replaced all three of its co-CEOs and merged two business units, its mobile and consumer appliances groups, into one. The company said the actions were intended to help lead it into the next phase of growth and to strengthen its business competitiveness.

Samsung said it expected memory demand to stay strong, driven by data-center servers and 5G phones. However, buyer appetite could be curbed due to production constraints created by component shortages and supply-chain issues.

The company has also been ramping up its investment in the contract-chip making business, including a new $17 billion factory in Texas. Chip supply should remain tight this year, said Kang Moon-soo, executive vice president of Samsung’s foundry division, on Thursday’s earnings call.

Samsung’s mobile business division reported a relatively solid quarter due in part to a strong rollout of its premium foldable phones, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Flip 3, that launched in August.

The company’s mobile division logged fourth-quarter operating profit of 2.66 trillion won, a 10% rise from the prior year, while revenue increased 30% to 28.95 trillion won. However, operating profit dropped on a quarterly basis due to a rise in marketing expenses. Component shortages are also curtailing overall phone production.

Samsung is set to debut its latest flagship smartphone, the Galaxy S22, on Feb. 9. Three versions of the phone are expected to be unveiled.

WSJ : Facebook’s Cryptocurrency Venture to Wind Down, Sell Assets

Facebook’s Cryptocurrency Venture to Wind Down, Sell Assets
Diem Association is selling its technology to crypto-focused bank Silvergate Capital for $200 million

Facebook’s ambitious effort to bring cryptocurrency to the masses has failed.

The Diem Association, the consortium Facebook founded in 2019 to build a futuristic payments network, is winding down and selling its technology to a small California bank that serves bitcoin and blockchain companies for about $200 million, a person familiar with the matter said.

The bank, Silvergate Capital Corp. SI -2.52% , had earlier reached a deal with Diem to issue some of the stablecoins—which are backed by hard dollars and designed to be less volatile than bitcoin and other digital currencies—that were at the heart of the effort.

The sale represents an effort to squeeze some remaining value from a venture that was challenged almost from the start. Facebook, now Meta Platforms Inc., FB -1.84% launched the project in 2019 as Libra, pitching it as a way for the social network’s billions of users to spend money as easily as sending a text message.

Libra brought on well-known partners in e-commerce and payments including PayPal Holdings Inc., Visa Inc. and Stripe Inc.—in part to signal buy-in from the finance industry and in part to distance the project from Facebook itself, which was under pressure about policing its platform. Partners agreed to join the Libra Association, a Switzerland-based group that would govern the stablecoin, and pony up millions of dollars each to develop the project.

But it almost immediately ran into resistance in Washington. Officials voiced concerns about its effect on financial stability and data privacy and worried Libra could be misused by money launderers and terrorist financiers. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank had serious concerns. Early backers dropped out, and Mark Zuckerberg was called before Congress, where he defended Facebook’s plan to bring financial services to the world’s underbanked.

While the SEC hasn’t announced major actions against big crypto exchanges, the commission has threatened to sue companies offering crypto lending. WSJ’s Dion Rabouin explains why this one part of the crypto market has drawn such a strong reaction. Photo: Mark Lennihan/Associated Press
In 2020, the group recruited Stuart Levey, a former U.S. Treasury official and top lawyer at HSBC Holdings PLC, as chief executive and ditched the Libra name in favor of Diem.

The stablecoin deal with Silvergate was part of a revamp last year meant to appease regulators.

David Marcus, the Meta executive who oversaw the launch of what would become Diem, left the company last year.

FT : How Germany went from Europe’s economic locomotive to its laggard

How Germany went from Europe’s economic locomotive to its laggard
Supply chain bottlenecks and weak household spending depress growth in eurozone’s largest economy

Germany’s former economy minister Peter Altmaier promised it would act as the “economic locomotive” that pulled the world out of its Covid-19 crisis — but instead the country now looks more like Europe’s laggard.

For a while, Germany was a pillar of relative resilience, its economy shrinking less than most of Europe in 2020. However, for the past year other countries have been rebounding faster and even Italy is expected to regain pre-pandemic levels of gross domestic product before Germany, which is teetering on the brink of a winter recession.

“Germany had a very good first half of the crisis, but in 2021 things reversed,” said Gilles Moec, chief economist at French insurer Axa, adding that weaknesses in the economy were evident “before the pandemic when Germany was already underperforming”.

Much of the recent underperformance of Europe’s largest economy stems from its greater exposure to global supply chain bottlenecks that have hit manufacturing, as well as a weaker recovery in household spending, economists said.

The country’s place near the foot of the European growth table was confirmed this month when its Federal Statistical Office estimated that national output grew 2.7 per cent last year — less than half the expected French and Italian rates and well below the 5.1 per cent growth forecast for the eurozone overall.

When quarterly GDP figures are published for Germany and France on Friday, they are set to underscore the diverging performance of the eurozone’s two largest economies. Analysts expect the German economy to even shrink slightly in the final three months of 2021 compared with the previous quarter, while France is expected to grow by 0.5 per cent. This week the IMF blamed “supply disruptions” for downgrading its 2022 German growth forecast from 4.6 per cent to 3.8 per cent.

The stiffening headwinds underline the challenges confronting Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s coalition government, especially as it plans to squeeze public spending next year when Germany’s constitutional debt brake comes back into force.


Robert Habeck, economy minister, said on Wednesday that “the consequences of the corona pandemic are still being felt and a number of companies are struggling with them”. But despite these “major challenges” he expected the economy to rebound with growth of 3.6 per cent this year.

While most economists agree on the sources of Germany’s recent weakness, there is less consensus on whether the country is likely to catch up quickly or remain in the doldrums for a prolonged period.

The answer is likely to hinge on how long supply snarl-ups continue to leave manufacturers short of many materials from semiconductors to lithium — preventing them from fulfilling record order books.

“Germany is an open and trade-integrated economy so it is more affected by the supply problems that have been created by the pandemic,” said Salomon Fiedler, an economist at investment bank Berenberg.

One of the hardest hit areas has been Germany’s carmaking industry, in which domestic production slumped 12 per cent last year to 3.1m vehicles — down more than 50 per cent from pre-pandemic levels in 2019.

Overall industrial production in Germany was still 7 per cent below pre-crisis levels in November, while in France it was down 5 per cent and in Italy, the eurozone’s third-biggest economy, it was even up slightly.

Marco Valli, chief European economist at UniCredit in Milan, said Germany was held back by its greater reliance on making vehicles, machinery and equipment. “The pandemic has provided a boost for consumer goods and this is much higher for both France and Italy,” he said.


Economists said Germany’s underperformance in 2021 was also related to a shortfall in household spending, which was still 2 per cent below pre-pandemic levels in the third quarter of last year, while French household spending was down less than 1 per cent.

“France has had a stronger recovery of private consumption,” said Katharina Utermöhl, senior economist at German insurer Allianz. “While Germany’s fiscal response was larger, the fear factor among people has been greater.”

Germany has struggled to vaccinate people as fast as its neighbours, with 72.7 per cent of its citizens fully vaccinated, compared with more than 75 per cent in France and Italy. Because unvaccinated people face rising Covid-19 restrictions, this is likely to further restrict Germany’s consumer recovery.

Labour shortages are another constraint. Detlef Scheele, head of the Federal Employment Agency, has estimated the country needs to bring in 400,000 skilled foreign workers a year — far more than it has done recently — to offset the impact of its ageing workforce.

Germany is also likely to be hit by the slowdown in China, its second-largest export market after the US. “If the market on which Germany has been betting for many years is disappointing then, as an export machine, you have a problem,” said Axa’s Moec.

Joachim Lang, director-general of Germany’s BDI business lobby group, said the spread of the Omicron coronavirus variant will cause further disruption to factory production in China and other Asian countries that “threatens to affect supply chains again this year”. 


Nonetheless, most economists still expect Germany to start regaining lost ground once supply bottlenecks ease and coronavirus restrictions are lifted. With a final fiscal stimulus this year — financed by issuing as much as €100bn of extra debt and €7.4bn from the EU recovery fund — the country “could go from one extreme to the other: from recession to growth champion,” said Carsten Brzeski, an economist at Dutch bank ING.

There were early signs of optimism in IHS Markit’s latest purchasing managers’ index survey of German businesses on Monday, which reported its highest level since September and “tentative signs of easing” in supply chain problems.

UniCredit’s Valli predicted Germany’s economy would lag behind France and Italy again this year — before outstripping them with growth of 3.8 per cent in 2023.

“We expect supply bottlenecks to have faded in 2023 and then we expect the German economy to catch up,” he said.

FT : CVC plans overhaul to keep lucrative profit stream private after IPO

CVC plans overhaul to keep lucrative profit stream private after IPO
Firm looks to prioritise investors’ access to management fees as rivals EQT and TPG have done

Europe’s biggest private equity firm CVC Capital Partners plans to overhaul its operations as part of a potential initial public offering, a move that would keep in private hands most or all of the lucrative profits it makes buying and selling companies.

The Luxembourg-based group is considering listing an entity that would allow public investors to benefit from its management fee income, a steady stream of cash from a levy on the pension funds and other institutions whose money it manages, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Relatively little or possibly no money from its other income stream, a 20 per cent share of profits on successful deals that can be far larger, would be available to the public under the plan, the people added.

CVC is the latest buyout group to consider the structure, which has become increasingly popular since Swedish firm EQT adopted it when listing in 2019. Although performance fees from successful buyouts can be far bigger, stock market investors are drawn to management fees, which are more reliable but a smaller proportion of the industry’s profits.

“The light went on” for some CVC executives after EQT’s listing, when an IPO “felt more attractive”, a person with knowledge of the matter said. “Suddenly there’s a group of people saying I love these management fees, I love the sheer predictable dullness of them,” they added.

EQT’s decision to give all its management fee income to shareholders has won it the industry’s richest valuation.

The plan from CVC marks a departure from the approach taken by buyout groups such as Blackstone, KKR, Apollo and Carlyle, which listed between 2007 and 2012 and typically gave public investors access to both income streams in about the same proportions as the firm itself.

A CVC listing would mark a historic transition of a secretive private equity group into a public-facing behemoth. CVC has $122bn in assets under management, according to its website, and has previously invested in Formula One. It owns stakes in the Six Nations rugby tournament, the communications company Teneo, and last year agreed to buy Unilever’s tea business for €4.5bn.

The buyout group is working with Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley as it draws up plans for a listing, said a person with knowledge of the matter, though it is not certain to go ahead.

CVC declined to comment.

The management fee on CVC’s latest private equity fund is 1.5 per cent, with discounts for institutions that commit large sums, according to an investor presentation.

US-based TPG restructured its finances as part of its IPO this month, giving shareholders just 20 per cent of its future performance-based profits, down from 50 per cent had the overhaul not happened

By contrast, Bridgepoint, which last year became the first leading private equity group to list in London since the 1990s, plans to increase the share of performance fee income it gives to public investors to as much as 35 per cent of future funds.

Shares in listed buyout groups have been on a tear for much of the pandemic, and a group of 11 firms collectively gained almost $240bn in market value in 2021. However, shares in Bridgepoint have fallen 24 per cent since the beginning of this year.

CVC last year took steps to bring in outside capital and increase its asset base, which are sometimes precursors to stock market listings of private equity groups.

The firm agreed to sell a minority stake to Blue Owl’s Dyal Capital unit in a deal that valued CVC at about $15bn, according to a person familiar with the matter. Separately, it bought Glendower Capital, which buys stakes in other private equity funds and backs deals where buyout groups sell companies to their own funds.

Facing pressure to lift the returns of their public shareholders, listed buyout groups are incentivised to raise more and larger funds — and to buy other asset managers — in order to increase the pools of cash on which they can charge fees.

FT : A remote village, a world-changing invention and the epic legal fight that

A remote village, a world-changing invention and the epic legal fight that followed
The twisted tale of the battle between Norway’s AutoStore and the UK's Ocado

In the village of Nedre Vats, on the edge of a 700m-deep fjord in the west of Norway, there is a white wooden house with a small red barn. This is the home of the Hattelands, village merchants since the 19th century and builders of a warehouse that sits nearby.

It was in the red barn 40 years ago that Jakob Hatteland, the scion of the family, started a television repair business and expanded into selling electrical components. It became the largest parts supplier in Scandinavia and in the mid-1990s grew too big for the warehouse. Then Ingvar Hognaland, Hatteland’s first, most creative, most determined employee, had an idea.

“I remember Ingvar saying, ‘What’s the biggest thing in the warehouse? Air — there’s too much air,” says Synnove Matre, an executive who still works in Nedre Vats for AutoStore, the company that grew out of Hognaland’s idea. She went on maternity leave but, at the Christmas party that year, they talked again. “Late that night in the bar, I said to him, ‘I want to work on your idea, it’s so cool.’”

Others thought it would never work, but Matre was right. Hognaland’s idea was to use robots to operate warehouses stacked as tightly as possible. It turned out to be so powerful that AutoStore went public last October with a market capitalisation of $12bn. The growth of ecommerce and the home delivery of goods meant that, when the pandemic broke out, his invention’s time had come.

Robots at work on a grid system at the AutoStore software development lab in Nedre Vats, Norway. The concept was the brainchild of employee Ingvar Hognaland, who was seeking ways to stack a warehouse as tightly as possible © Helge Skodvin
If your groceries are supplied by Ocado in the UK (or Kroger in Cincinnati and Atlanta, or Casino in Paris, for which Ocado supplies technology), you have experienced his legacy. The retail industry increasingly relies on automated warehouses, and the approach that Hognaland pioneered and that Ocado built on, is even more advanced than Amazon’s. AutoStore systems are being used in more than 40 countries, with 29,000 robots on wheels.

It would be an inspiring story of inventive genius in logistics, except for one problem: Hognaland’s idea turned out to be so valuable that Ocado adapted it without permission. That set off an ongoing global patent battle between the two companies, with billions at stake. When Ocado won one stage of a US legal case in December, its value rose by more than £1bn that day, while AutoStore’s dropped.

On one side is a quiet, determined Scandinavian company that spent a quarter of a century diligently making its robots work, one step at a time. On the other, an aggressive British disrupter that seized on the idea to turn itself into a juggernaut. And beneath it all, a classic question: does a revolutionary innovation belong to the person who had the idea, or should it belong to the world?

FT : Has the appetite for plant-based meat already peaked?

Has the appetite for plant-based meat already peaked?
Despite sales growth falling in the US and UK, an extra $3bn was invested into the sector in 2021

Neil Rankin is an unlikely plant-based food entrepreneur. The 45-year-old Scot made his name spearheading London’s barbecue restaurant boom a decade ago, serving up steaks, ribs and whole carcasses cooked on open fires.

After deciding that serving even sustainably reared meat would do little to reverse the environmental impact of the industry, he pivoted to vegan burgers and sausages, developing his product in his home kitchen. “I’ve cooked millions of steaks over the past 10 years or so. I think I’ve come to the end of [cooking meat] and plant-based is just so uncharted,” he says.

Eschewing the use of protein processed from legumes such as soya or peas, favoured by many makers of plant-based meat, his quest for a sustainable alternative using vegetables led him to a vegan “meat” using fermented onions, beets and mushrooms.

Rankin’s company Symplicity Foods is now supplying premium burger chains and restaurants in the UK, including Gordon Ramsay’s Street Burger outlets, Soho House, the private members club, and Indian eatery Dishoom. After completing a £2m fundraising round it has just opened a bigger production facility in north London.

Bean patties and tofu burgers have been around for decades, but consumer interest in the new generation of plant-based meats, mimicking the taste, texture and smell of animal meat, surged around the flotation of US start-up Beyond Meat in 2019.

But the push by Rankin coincides with a faltering in sales growth in the sector. After a 46 per cent rise in 2020 on the back of soaring demand at the start of the pandemic, sales in plant-based meat in the US in 2021 fell 0.5 per cent, according to data provider SPINS. In the UK, Kantar numbers show that sales tailed off in the second half of last year, although in December they experienced a rebound.

“We have probably had a bit of a hype cycle, with an awful lot of people trying things once or twice,” says Will Hayllar, global managing partner of OC&C Strategy Consultants. “That has driven very rapid growth.”

The slowdown in growth has taken some executives by surprise. Many had anticipated that the continuing anxiety over climate change and the environmental cost of the meat industry — which accounts for 15 per cent of global carbon emissions — would act as a major spur for plant-based faux meat. Created with the help of biochemists and molecular scientists, it offers a way of cutting meat intake without sacrificing something that many consumers crave and love.


“This category has decelerated across the board,” Michael McCain, chief executive of Maple Leaf Foods, told analysts in November as he announced a review of the Canadian group’s plant-based meat business. Investors have also been unnerved by Beyond Meat’s performance, blamed on a range of issues from Covid-related labour shortages to outages at its facilities, for its relatively subdued US revenue outlook. Its shares now trade at about a quarter of its 2019 peak and the lossmaking group’s market capitalisation, once above $15bn, has slipped below $4bn.

Rankin believes the ebbing of the sales surge is down to products which fail to meet taste expectations. “There are a lot of people that have moved to plant-based because of sustainability issues, but yet they aren’t really satisfied with what’s out there,” he says. Price has also been an issue as plant-based meat makers have struggled to get repeat purchases from customers once the initial excitement has died down.

Primetime audition
During the pandemic, plant-based meat had its “big audition” which triggered the large jump in sales in 2020, says Arlin Wasserman, founder of food strategy consultancy Changing Tastes. But long term that seems to have actually worked against the category, especially in the US.

Buying in large quantities during the lockdowns highlighted “the shortcomings of next-generation plant-based meats”, Wasserman adds. He blames the long list of ingredients with unfamiliar names for making the product look like highly processed food and acting as a barrier to repeat purchases.


“Consumers may buy it once, but after reading the label, slow down their purchases,” he says.

In a Changing Tastes survey of 3,000 adults in the US in December, about 40 per cent said they did not eat plant-based meats or would not eat them in the future despite 39 per cent saying they wanted to reduce their red meat consumption. “It’s an extremely high negative for such a new idea,” says Wasserman.

Clues as to whether plant-based meat is just another fad might be found in the “Gartner hype cycle” of emerging technologies, say agritech consultants and investment experts. Developed by the US research and consultancy group, the curve illustrates what it says are the five phases in the lifecycle of a new technology — the initial surge in expectations and then disappointment when it does not deliver, leading to consolidation or company failures, improved product, and finally mainstream adoption.

Many innovations, including mobile phones, artificial intelligence and electric vehicles follow the cycle. Plant-based meat along with other agri-technologies, such as insects for food and vertical farming, can be plotted against the same curve, says Henry Gordon-Smith, founder of consultancy Agritecture. For plant-based meat, “we are over the peak and already into the ‘trough of disillusionment’.” Gordon-Smith characterises this as a period where start-up failures and industry consolidation lead to improved efficiencies, stronger players and better products, fuelling renewed growth.

The sustainability reasons for reducing consumption of meat — the production of which also contributes to land degradation and water pollution — remain compelling, with the global population predicted to rise by another 2bn before 2050. Continuing investment is being made into alternative proteins, with $3bn raised globally by plant-based start-ups in 2021, up 74 per cent from a year earlier, according to data group PitchBook.

Massimo Zucchero, head of plant-based meal solutions at Nestlé, the world’s largest food group, blames slower US sales growth on reduced media interest and retailers rethinking their strategies and reorganising shelf space. In Europe there is high double-digit growth across most countries, he says. “Yes, there has been a slowdown. [But] the market is going to start growing again.”

Nestlé estimates the value of the plant-based meat category to be around $8bn in terms of sales, with potential growth of around 20 per cent per annum across the next five years.

Hanneke Faber, president of Unilever’s foods division, echoes Zucchero. She too believes that the US phenomenon is temporary and predicts that “going forward this market will continue to grow in the 20 per cent range” every year.


Whether such projections are more than wishful thinking remains unclear. It is easy to eat a plant-based burger at a restaurant, but breaking a shopping habit and wondering if other family members will join in is more difficult, says Hayllar.

“Changing people’s meal consumption habits, changing the way they cook, that tends to be a slower thing to happen.”

The fight for the ‘centre of the plate’
For large food companies, plant-based proteins have widened the opportunity to compete for what they call the “centre of the plate” in western markets, which have for decades been dominated by meat processors and farmers. Now, multinationals are racing to build a business in plant-based protein alternatives, as well as investing for the future in lab-grown meat.

At a tasting event on a floating hotel in London last year, Nestle’s chief executive Mark Schneider predicted that every animal protein would over time have a plant-based alternative as he introduced the company’s latest faux shrimp and egg products, as well as plant-based sausages, mince and chicken alternatives. Fake ham and smoked salmon are also under development.

Hayllar says plant-based protein appeals to consumer goods makers such as Nestlé and Unilever because it is branded, not commodified, enabling them to tap into their marketing strengths and create price differentiation between premium and everyday versions of the product. “One of the interesting things about the [worldwide] shift to plant-based is that it’s been a brand-led move, whereas in a market like the UK the meat is almost all private label [or unbranded] . . . one of the appeals for businesses . . . is that they can market [these products] to shift consumer behaviour,” he adds.

Investing in alternative proteins, including plant-based meats, also offers larger companies the opportunity to burnish their environmental credentials for investors. “It’s one thing they can add to their annual report helping reputational gains. Some see it as a social cost to operate,” says JP Frossard, consumer foods analyst at Rabobank in New York.

Investor advisory and research network Fairr — Farm Animal Investment Risk and Return — backed by institutional investors managing about $47tn, has called on food and meat companies as well as restaurants and retailers to increase their alternative protein offerings to enhance returns and mitigate future supply risk.

Continuous spending on research and development into areas from taste and texture to health and nutrition is needed to make meaningful inroads into plant-based foods and maintain consumer interest, say executives. Unilever, for example, spent €85m on a food innovation research centre at the Wageningen University campus in the Netherlands, with a focus on plant-based ingredients and meat alternatives and other products such as ice cream and mayonnaise, according to Faber.


Frossard says: “You’re not going to survive unless you continue research for a better product — focus needs to be on affordability and taste.”

At a tasting event at a restaurant in London’s Leicester Square, more than 100 of the city’s chefs last November marked the arrival of the latest innovation from Israeli start-up Redefine Meat. The company became the first to commercially launch a “structured” plant-based meat, and the chefs tucked into dishes including “beef cut au poivre” and “lamb cut la Dijonnaise” made from meat produced via a 3D printer.

For the large part, faux meat products have been those made from ingredients pushed through an extruder to resemble mince. Apart from cracking the “holy grail” of cuts of meat, Redefine co-founder Eshchar Ben-Shitrit believes the start-up has worked out how to reproduce the juiciness of real meat.

The next big thing in alternative proteins will be the eventual commercial launch of meats made from cow, pig and chicken cells grown in vats. Although not vegetarian, they are expected to generate lower emissions than live animals. Having gained the world’s first regulatory approval in Singapore in 2020, entrepreneurs behind lab-grown meat are hoping that sometime this year, US food authorities will give it the nod.

Despite the dystopian images of scientists creating meat in laboratories, many consumers in the west seem oblivious to the rise of technology in food, say analysts. R&D has long been a feature in the food industry, with tastes, smells and textures carefully analysed and developed.

“I don’t think many consumers will be put off by the food being invented in a laboratory with some exceptions,” says Wasserman. “So it’s more about how it is produced after it’s invented.”


Seaweed and fermented tomatoes
Executives and analysts believe that the opportunities are too big for plant-based meat to be a flash in the pan. Indeed, the Good Food Institute, a lobbying and consultancy group for alternative proteins, believes that the industry will need five to 10 times more production capacity by 2030 to satisfy demand.

Nestlé sees various opportunities in the category, including emerging markets, especially in Asia where vegan protein-rich products such as tofu have been around for centuries and where consumers are discovering new plant-based foods.

Another area is a whole different plant-based segment that does not try to mimic meat. This is about “putting vegetables at the heart of, the centre of the plate, in a delicious way,” says Zucchero. His colleague Wayne England, head of food strategy at Nestlé, says demand for meat will need to be satisfied by alternative sources because current levels of consumption are not environmentally sustainable. “There is so much more to come to the category,” he says, “the world cannot feed itself with so much meat.”

It is not just the multinationals pushing R&D efforts. On the other end of the spectrum, Rankin says he is busy with development of his own.

He is working on a healthy fat using seaweed and fermented tomatoes and is also looking at the byproducts from his manufacturing process, including the liquid that comes off the fermentation of vegetables which might be turned into products such as gravy. Turning leftover sourdough bread into miso instead of importing the soyabean-based condiment from Japan is another project.

“There’s so much that I don’t think I’m going to get it done in the next year, so I think I’m going to be at this for a fair while,” he says.

Consumers will return to plant-based meats once the products evolve, says Rankin. “The interest [in plant-based meat] isn’t waning,” he adds. “I [just] think the product has not quite caught up with the interest yet.”

>>> US After Hours Summary: NOW +10%, XM +9.7%, LEVI +8%, STX +5.9%, LVS +2.6% higher on earnings; TER -17.7%, LC -12.1%, LRCX -6%, INTC -2.3% lower on earnings


After Hours Summary: NOW +10%, XM +9.7%, LEVI +8%, STX +5.9%, LVS +2.6% higher on earnings; TER -17.7%, LC -12.1%, LRCX -6%, INTC -2.3% lower on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: ARAY +10.6%, NOW +10% (also names new COO), XM +9.7%, LEVI +8%, FLEX +6.7%, MEOH +6.6%, STX +5.9%, AVT +5.4%, CALX +4.9%, WOLF +3.9%, CNMD +2.7%, LVS +2.6%, URI +2.5%, VRTX +1.6%, CCI +1.2%, WHR +1.1%, TSLA +0.7%, XLNX +0.7%, SLG +0.6%, HXL +0.2%, AMP +0.1% (also announces $3 bln share buyback authorization), CNS +0.1%, DRE +0.1%, SEIC +0.1%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: TWNK +9.3% (to be added to S&P SmallCap 600), ATRA +8.9% (enters into strategic manufacturing partnership with Fujifilm), GLPG +7.5% (names new CEO), EEFT +7.4% (to be added to S&P MidCap 400), NFLX +4.7% (Pershing Square and Bill Ackman announce that firm has acquired 3.1+ mln NFLX shares over last few days), CNC +4.6% (CNC and CI had preliminary discussions about takeover of CNC, but talks did not lead to serious negotiations, according to Bloomberg), CMP +4.5% (will move from S&P MidCap 400 to S&P SmallCap 600), JACK +3.1% (will move from S&P MidCap 400 to S&P SmallCap 600), DDOG +2.7% (receives FedRAMP moderate impact level authorization), UPST +2.6% (in sympathy with LC earnings report), MARA +1.2% (names new CTO), GM +1% (to hire 8000 technology workers for EVs, according to Reuters), SCHW +1% (increases dividend), NDAQ +1% (enters into $325 mln accelerated stock repurchase agreement), MRO +0.9% (increases dividend), CMI +0.8% (CEO met with President Biden to support Build Back Better Act), CVX +0.5% (increases dividend), SPOT +0.3% (to remove Neil Young music, according to WSJ), OFG +0.2% (increases dividend, also approves new $100 mln stock repurchase auth), WTS +0.2% (will move from S&P SmallCap 600 to S&P MidCap 400), BLL +0.1% (names new CEO), CWT +0.1% (increases dividend), HCA +0.1% (to build five new hospitals in Texas)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: TER -17.7% (also increases dividend by 10%, expects to buy back $750 mln of stock in 2022), LC -12.1%, SIMO -7.9%, LRCX -6%, MKSI -5.6%, EW -5.2%, PTC -3.1%, INTC -2.3% (also raises dividend by 5%), AZPN -0.5%, RLI -0.2%, ISBC -0.1%, PKG -0.1% (also approves new $1 bln repurchase authorization)

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: EPZM -24.7% (stock offering), ZYME -9.4% (stock offering), GPS -3.2% (will move from S&P 500 to S&P MidCap 400), CI -2.1% (CNC and CI had preliminary discussions about takeover of CNC, but talks did not lead to serious negotiations, according to Bloomberg), RMO -1.6% (files for $350 mln mixed securities shelf offering), CUE -1.4% (reports two objective responses in first interim update from study of CUE-101 and KEYTRUDA), SPPI -0.6% (to be removed from S&P SmallCap 600), OCA -0.4% (terminates merger with Kin Insurance), SWK -0.2% (to restate EPS for last three years), J -0.1% (increases dividend)