WSJ : Fed Interest-Rate Decision Tees Up March Increase

Fed Interest-Rate Decision Tees Up March Increase
Officials have accelerated plans to unwind support for the economy amid rising inflation

The Federal Reserve held short-term interest rates steady on Wednesday and signaled intentions to raise them in mid-March, the latest turn toward removing stimulus to temper elevated inflation.

“It will soon be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal-funds rate,” the Fed said in its postmeeting statement.

At a news conference, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank’s rate-setting committee was ready to raise rates at its March 15-16 meeting. “The economy no longer needs sustained monetary policy support,” he said.

The central bank approved one final round of asset purchases, which will bring that stimulus program to a conclusion by March. Officials continued deliberations at their two-day meeting over how and when to shrink the Fed’s $9 trillion securities portfolio, which has more than doubled since March 2020.

The Fed released a separate one-page statement that spelled out high-level principles to guide a process for “significantly reducing” those holdings.

Stocks sold off during Mr. Powell’s press conference on Wednesday afternoon, and yields on 10-year Treasury securities jumped as investors anticipated a more aggressive path of rate rises.

The Fed cut short-term interest rates to near zero and started buying bonds to lower long-term rates in 2020 as the coronavirus pandemic hit the U.S. economy, triggering financial-market volatility and a deep, short recession.

Officials pledged to hold interest rates near zero until inflation was forecast to moderately exceed 2% and until the labor market returned to levels consistent with maximum employment.

Mr. Powell indicated he and his colleagues believe those goals have been met. Both inflation and employment “are calling for us to move steadily away from the very highly accommodative policies we put in place during the challenging economic conditions that the economy faced earlier in the pandemic,” he said.

Brisk demand for goods and shortages for intermediate goods such as semiconductors have pushed inflation to its highest 12-month readings in decades. Inflation rose 5.7% in November from a year earlier, using the Fed’s preferred gauge, and easily surpassed the Fed’s first objective.

But it has been developments in the labor market that provided greater urgency in recent weeks for the Fed to accelerate plans to raise rates much faster than officials anticipated last summer.

Sharp wage gains and a historic drop in the unemployment rate over the second half of last year—to 3.9% in December from 5.9% in June—led officials Wednesday to declare their employment-related goal had also been achieved.

Fed officials face a tricky task of responding to high inflation with two different policy instruments, which could provide more ammunition to slow the economy, but which have in the past caused confusion with markets.

Mr. Powell and his colleagues have indicated they will start the process of shrinking their asset holdings sooner than they did after the central bank stopped buying bonds in 2014. They have also indicated that the process of shrinking those holdings—by allowing securities to mature without reinvesting their proceeds into new ones—is likely to proceed faster than it did the last time the Fed reduced its holdings in 2017.

The Fed said Wednesday that it wants adjustments of its short-term benchmark interest rate, the federal-funds rate, to be the primary way that it responds to changes in the economic outlook. Officials have indicated they would again opt for a path for unwinding their asset holdings that runs on a premapped schedule once they have raised rates. But the statement provided no guidance about when that process might start.

The prospect of more interest-rate increases and a shrinking Fed portfolio to reduce inflation has led to heightened market volatility in recent days, prompting investors to sell shares of some technology companies, cryptocurrencies and other risky assets that enjoyed a boom last year.

The Fed’s turn to tighten policy “is definitely not a sudden revelation and has been more of an evolution, so why the market has just now gotten the message is a little confounding,” said Tom Graff, head of fixed income and portfolio manager at Brown Advisory.

Mr. Graff said markets have taken the Fed’s promises of tighter monetary policy more seriously after officials earlier this month signaled they had begun contemplating plans to shrink their asset portfolio. “If your thesis was that a particular stock valuation made sense because interest rates were always going to remain extremely low, then that was on borrowed time,” he said.

For months last year, Mr. Powell and his colleagues said they didn’t need to raise rates to bring inflation down because they believed high readings stemmed primarily from supply-chain bottlenecks and other difficulties associated with reopening the economy.

Mr. Powell changed course in November and said that the central bank was concerned inflation might become entrenched. That set in motion a policy pivot that has been rapid by Fed standards, given its preference to move in measured steps to avoid whipsawing markets.

The pivot reflected a shifting calculus about the potential for stronger demand to push up prices such as wages and rents that could keep inflation elevated even after bottlenecks and shortages of items such as cars and trucks abate.

Officials are giving more weight to the prospect that the aggressive fiscal- and monetary-policy responses to the pandemic altered traditional recessionary dynamics, buoying wage growth that normally takes longer to recover after a downturn.

A sharp run-up in home values, stocks and other assets has boosted wealth for many Americans, fueling stronger demand and potentially allowing some to retire earlier than they had anticipated, tightening the labor market.

Central-bank officials last month penciled in three quarter-percentage-point interest rate increases this year and three more next year. They based the projections for the increases on a forecast that sees inflation falling below 3% by December and to slightly more than 2% by the end of next year.

Mr. Powell said that, since the Fed’s last meeting, he had become somewhat less confident in his projection of how far inflation would decline this year. “That does raise the risk that high inflation will be more persistent” and that the Fed would have to raise rates more aggressively, he said.

“This outlook is quite uncertain, and we’re going to have to adapt,” he said.

FT : Oaktree scuppers Evergrande restructuring plan by seizing ‘Versailles mansi

Oaktree scuppers Evergrande restructuring plan by seizing ‘Versailles mansion’ plot
Receiver appointed to Hong Kong development that was key to draft $20bn bondholder deal

Oaktree Capital has scuppered a plan to restructure Evergrande’s $20bn of offshore debts by seizing a vast Hong Kong plot where the ailing property developer’s chair had intended to build a Versailles-like mansion.

Los Angeles-based Oaktree this week moved to seize control of the asset — known by insiders as “Project Castle” — after Evergrande defaulted on a loan against which the $158bn asset manager had security, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The 2.2m sq ft project was a key piece of collateral in a planned restructuring of Evergrande’s giant offshore debt load but the plan is now in turmoil after Oaktree appointed a receiver, according to one of the people.

Project Castle was set to form a significant chunk of the assets that would facilitate the restructuring of the company’s offshore debts, one of the people said.

“Evergrande has got the offshore bondholders to stop making noise on the basis there’s a restructuring process coming soon,” said this person. “That land was going to be used to facilitate the restructuring.”

The appointment of the receiver has to be approved by a Hong Kong court, after which the asset “will be removed from the general restructuring of Evergrande”, according to the second person involved.

Evergrande announced on the Hong Kong stock exchange on Wednesday that it “aims to come up with a preliminary restructuring proposal in the next six months”.

The move by Oaktree represents one of the most significant yet from any international player in the ongoing crisis at Evergrande, which last year became a symbol of the vast debts underpinning China’s property sector and now faces a drawn-out restructuring process. Oaktree declined to comment. Evergrande did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Evergrande’s debt restructuring will be the biggest in China’s history and a politically sensitive process for a company whose rapid growth made its chair and founder Hui Ka Yan China’s richest man as recently as 2017 and where tens of thousands of ordinary Chinese citizens hold investments in the company and have bought its homes.

Evergrande has scrambled to reassure creditors after a series of defaults since its finances started to unravel last year.

Investors on international bond markets, where Evergrande has borrowed around $20bn of its more than $300bn in total liabilities, have focused on its offshore assets including listed subsidiaries in Hong Kong. They last week warned over potential enforcement action against the company, which responded with a statement asking them not to take legal action.

Evergrande’s $4.7bn bond maturing in 2025 is trading at around 16 cents on the dollar, meaning bondholders are expecting to get back a tiny fraction of the money they lent the company.

Evergrande had been attempting to sell the residential project, in the Yuen Long area of Hong Kong’s New Territories, since last year as part of its plans to sell non-core assets to minimise losses for creditors. It was reported to be valued at around US$1bn.

Oaktree’s founder Howard Marks, a former acolyte of the so-called “junk bond king” Michael Milken, has a reputation as one of the savviest specialists in distressed investing, where hedge funds try to extract profits from the debts of troubled companies.

In September, Marks told the Financial Times that Oaktree’s long-term time horizon allowed it to ride out the short-term market volatility in China. He said: “Compared with the US, Europe and Japan, I think of China as an economic adolescent . . . tempestuous and volatile but its best decades are ahead.”

Evergrande first began missing interest payments on its offshore bonds in September and was placed in default by Fitch, the rating agency, in December. By that time its liquidity woes had spread across China’s vast real estate sector and several of its peers had also missed international bond payments.

WSJ : SEC Proposes New Disclosure Mandates for Private-Equity, Hedge Funds

SEC Proposes New Disclosure Mandates for Private-Equity, Hedge Funds
Measure would seek to improve regulators’ understanding of private funds’ operations and risks to financial stability

WASHINGTON—Federal regulators proposed measures that would significantly increase their visibility into private-equity funds and some hedge funds, the first in a range of plans to expand oversight of private markets.

The Securities and Exchange Commission voted 3-1 to issue a proposal Wednesday that would increase the amount and timeliness of confidential information that private-equity and hedge funds report to the agency on a document known as Form PF. A main goal, Chairman Gary Gensler said, is to allow regulators to better understand the operations and strategies of private funds for purposes of gauging their implications for financial stability.

Hester Peirce, the commission’s only Republican, voted against the proposal.

The commission, in a meeting Wednesday, is also unveiling a separate proposal that would expand oversight of some trading platforms that match buyers and sellers of U.S. Treasury securities. The agency will seek comment on the proposals before finalizing the rules, a process which could take several months at least.

Net assets managed by private funds, which are accessible only to institutional investors or relatively wealthy individuals, rose to $11.7 trillion in the first quarter of last year from $5.3 trillion in 2013, SEC data show. With the growth have come concerns from some policy makers about the potential for unseen risks to accumulate in a corner of the market that is far less transparent than mutual funds or publicly traded companies.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
How should the SEC approach private-equity funds and Treasury debt? Join the conversation below.

The SEC adopted Form PF as part of the regulatory overhaul following the 2008 financial crisis. Currently, it is filed by private-equity funds and large hedge funds on an annual or quarterly basis with a 60-day lag. The form includes information such as net assets, borrowings and derivative holdings. The SEC and group of federal financial-stability regulators then aggregate that confidential data in public reports.

“We have identified significant information gaps and situations where we would benefit from additional information,” Mr. Gensler said in a statement, noting that regulators have nearly a decade of experience with Form PF data. “For example, we would benefit from more timely information during fast-moving market events.”

Among other changes, Wednesday’s proposal would require large hedge funds to file reports within one business day of incidents such as extraordinary investment losses. Private-equity funds would have to file reports within one business day of events such as removal of a fund’s general partner or termination of a fund’s investment period.

In addition, the proposal would reduce the threshold that triggers reporting as a large private-equity adviser to $1.5 billion from $2 billion in assets under management. It would also require such entities to provide more information about their use of leverage and their portfolio companies.

Mr. Gensler, who was nominated last year by President Biden, has outlined a series of possible ways to address some Democrats’ concerns that private markets have become too big and risky over the past decade or so.

Last year, he said the SEC is considering new rules to increase disclosures by private-equity firms and hedge funds to their investors about their conflicts of interest and sometimes opaque fee structures.

The agency is also working on a plan to require more private companies to routinely disclose information about their finances and operations, and potentially increase the amount of information that some nonpublic companies must file with the agency.

>>> Orpea -16% - stocl lost 50% since Monday - 3Bil Mkt Cap

Attal : Orpea devra être sanctionné si les accusations contre le groupe sont avérées

26/01/2022 | 15:58


PARIS (Agefi-Dow Jones)--Le porte-parole du gouvernement, Gabriel Attal, a évoqué mercredi la possibilité de sanctionner l'exploitant de maisons de retraite Orpea si les accusations à l'encontre de l'entreprise étaient avérées. La gestion du groupe a été mise en cause dans un livre-enquête intitulé "Les Fossoyeurs".
"Les révélations qui ont été faites dans ce livre sont absolument révoltantes [...] si ces faits sont avérés, ils devront évidemment être sanctionnés avec la plus grande sévérité", a déclaré le membre du gouvernement lors d'un point presse.
L'entreprise a démenti les accusations portées à son encontre dans le livre et a saisi ses avocats.
"A la demande d'Olivier Véran [le ministre de la Santé, NDLR], le directeur général d'Orpea a été convoqué par la ministre déléguée chargée de l'Autonomie, Brigitte Bourguignon" qui s'entretiendra avec lui "dans les plus brefs délais", a par ailleurs indiqué Gabriel Attal.
Le gouvernement a aussi demandé à l'Agence régionale de santé (ARS) d'Île-de-France "leur dernier rapport de contrôle inopiné sur" l'établissement francilien mis en cause dans le livre "et les suites qui avaient été données à ce rapport", a poursuivi le porte-parole du gouvernement.
"Nous envisageons, sur la base de ce rendez-vous avec le directeur général d'Orpea et des retours que nous aurons de l'Agence régionale de santé sur ce contrôle et sur ce rapport, de lancer une mission d'inspection indépendante par l'Inspection générale des affaires sociales pour l'intégralité du groupe Orpea", a également indiqué Gabriel Attal.

FT Lex : Lindt: time for Swiss chocolatier to raise the bar

Lindt: time for Swiss chocolatier to raise the bar
With sales set to fall this year, the group might be wise to reposition itself more upmarket

Lindt & Sprüngli enjoyed a chocolate high during the pandemic. The Swiss chocolatier is now a lot less full of beans. Last week, it said organic sales growth would roughly halve to 5-7 per cent this year. The shares remain above pre-Covid levels but have fallen nearly 20 per cent since the new year.

Chocolate is losing its appeal as an anti-covid hedge. Shares in Barry Callebaut, a rival Swiss chocolate maker, gave up early gains on Wednesday after expectation-beating three-month sales figures.

Society and economies are establishing a new normal. The overlay in the case of Lindt is the positioning of its chocolates as affordable luxuries.

Pushing further upmarket would be a canny strategy for Lindt. Demand for durable luxury goods such as handbags are enjoying secular growth.

Lindt needs to expand its distribution, especially of premium products. At present this venerable business concentrates on Europe. North America, where production was hit by supply bottlenecks, contributes less than a quarter of operating profits. Asia is an even smaller source of earnings, according to the same S&P data.

Fast-growing developing markets could offset slower growth in mature economies. The Swiss company can also shore up sales with new products such as sugar-reduced and vegan chocolates.

Operating profit margins are expected to improve to 15 per cent this year. That is better than small UK rival Hotel Chocolat. But chief executive Dieter Weisskopf needs to focus on improving medium-term profitability, even so. That means investments in distribution and advertising to make the brand a little cooler.

Short term, the result would be fewer payouts to rival last March’s Sfr750m ($815m) share buyback. But no one invests in Swiss industry for a fast buck.

High, chocolate-fuelled expectations and Lindt’s reputation for resilience help explain why, despite this year’s falls, its shares still trade at around 45 times forward earnings expectations, far higher than Barry Callebaut and Nestlé. To justify the premium classification of its shares Lindt needs to reinforce the credentials of its chocolates in that market segment.