WSJ : Car-Insurance Bills Are Rising, With More Increases to Com

Car-Insurance Bills Are Rising, With More Increases to Come
Rates up as much as 20% as insurers struggle with inflation

Car owners need to buckle up: Higher premiums are starting to arrive as insurers get state approval for rate increases to offset inflation and an increase in serious crashes.

Rates are rising as much as 20% in some locations, as insurers seek increases to compensate for what they believe will be more sustained inflation. Consumers are starting to see the impact when their policies, which typically run for six months, come up for renewal.

Some state insurance departments, including California’s, are pushing back or going slow on approving the increases.

“These cost increases are going to be here for a while,” said Allstate Corp. ALL 2.39% Chief Executive Tom Wilson, speaking about inflation in repairing and replacing vehicles. “So we’ve been raising prices pretty aggressively, as well as reducing our expenses.”

Car insurers have struggled as driving and accidents have rebounded from pandemic lows. Car repairs and replacement vehicles are more expensive. Insurers are paying for longer rental periods than they used to, amid shortages of body-shop technicians and delays in getting repair parts, among other cost pressures. In addition, traffic fatalities surged in 2021 to a 16-year high.

During the first quarter, Allstate increased rates in 28 states an average of 9.3% for its Allstate car-insurance brand. An Allstate senior executive told analysts in an earnings call in early May that, “given the ongoing inflationary pressure, we have increased the magnitude of rate increases we expect to take in the rest of 2022.” Allstate’s underwriting income for its car- and home-insurance unit fell 83% to $280 million in the quarter.

From the middle of last year when some insurers began raising rates aggressively, the industry through early May obtained increases on about 61% of its base of personal-auto premiums, said Elyse Greenspan, an analyst with Wells Fargo Securities. For now, the rate increases are “not enough to offset the elevated loss trend.”

The increases vary by state, with larger rate hikes by big carriers ranging from 7% to 20% as of March, according to filings reviewed by S&P Global Market Intelligence. The average U.S. car-insurance rate was $1,529 last year, according to Zebra, a price-comparison website.

So far, regulators in California, the nation’s most populous state, haven’t approved any recent rate-increase requests. The regulators are concerned partly that Covid-19 premium-relief programs offered by car insurers in general were inadequate, said Deputy Commissioner Michael Soller.

Nationally, those programs spared consumers about $14 billion in payments during early months of the pandemic in 2020 when driving plummeted and insurers enjoyed outsize profits.

The California department is reviewing data from Allstate and other carriers deemed to have the largest gaps between what the state believes they owe consumers and what has been refunded “to determine how best to close the gap,” Mr. Soller said.

Allstate provided average 15% premium reductions to personal auto-insurance customers for three months in 2020, allowed payment delays and took other steps to help policyholders. “From our standpoint, we gave our shareholders $1 billion back, and we were not in any way, shape or form required to do that,” Mr. Wilson said. “We did it because we thought it was the right thing to do.”
Mr. Wilson said that insurers don’t sell policies “to give their money away,” and that most regulators “understand and are supporting price increases.”

As they seek higher rates, “some insurance companies have slowed new-business growth and tightened underwriting standards,” most notably in California, said Matthew Carletti, an analyst with JMP Securities.

The U.S. personal car-insurance industry has turned an underwriting profit in just three of the past 10 years, according to Moody’s Investors Service. That means some insurers over much of the past decade annually sent more money out the door in claims and other expenses than they collected in premiums, before accounting for income earned by investing premiums, though results vary widely across companies.

Many carriers also have other lines of business and operations that have helped them generate profits overall.
When regulators deny or delay approvals for justified increases in the name of consumer protection, it “will have the exact opposite effect on policyholders by threatening the availability of coverage and the solvency of companies providing it,” said Neil Alldredge, president of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies.

Consumer activists see it differently. Birny Birnbaum, executive director of the Center for Economic Justice, said that some “regulators seem to uncritically approve rate increases.”

One noticeable element of the push for higher premiums may be a decline in advertising for car insurance. Insurers don’t want to attract too many new customers at rates they consider insufficient, and cutting marketing expenses can reduce costs to boost results.

Progressive Corp. PGR 3.02% Chief Executive Tricia Griffith said in the company’s first-quarter call in May that once rate increases are approved, the company will boost marketing to spur growth.

“We want to be open for Californians and we’ll work closely with the regulators to make that happen,” she said. Progressive said it provided more than $1 billion in premium credits in 2020, among other actions aiding policyholders.

WSJ : With Elon Musk’s Twitter Bid in Flux, Some Tesla Fans Say Enough Already

With Elon Musk’s Twitter Bid in Flux, Some Tesla Fans Say Enough Already
Electric-car maker’s stock has tumbled around 30% since billionaire disclosed his stake in social-media company

Elon Musk’s Twitter Inc. TWTR 1.64% takeover comments haven’t just riled the social-media company’s executives and staff. They have also frustrated some of the billionaire’s loyal Tesla Inc. TSLA 7.33% backers.

The electric-vehicle maker has lost roughly 30% of its value since April 1, as the will-he-or-won’t-he drama around Mr. Musk’s investment in Twitter—and eventual $44 billion deal to take over the social-media company—has played out. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell around 15% in that time.

The episode has sparked concerns even among some fans of the Tesla chief executive that he might risk stretching himself too thin. Mr. Musk also runs rocket company SpaceX and helped start a tunneling enterprise and a neuroscience startup working on brain-implant technologies. Now with Twitter, some Tesla supporters are concerned that he could lose focus.

“I wish he would walk away,” said Gary Black, managing partner of the Future Fund LLC, which owns roughly $50 million worth of Tesla, according to FactSet. Mr. Black, a Tesla booster, said he views Twitter as a distraction that is likely to demand more of Mr. Musk’s time than the billionaire expects.

A close follower of Tesla recently tweeted at Mr. Musk and the Twitter CEO: “Elon, Twitter is an unnecessary distraction. Just focus on Tesla.”

Mr. Musk has sought to quell such anxiety. “To be clear, I’m spending <5% (but actually) of my time on the Twitter acquisition. It ain’t rocket science!” he tweeted last week. “Tesla is on my mind 24/7.”

Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Concerns Mr. Musk may have taken on too much aren’t new, and he has been able to build Tesla into the world’s most valuable auto maker while also running Space Exploration Technologies Corp., as SpaceX is formally known.

Tesla investors have digested Mr. Musk’s Twitter takeover effort in waves. The company’s stock fell around 8% from April 1—the last trading day before Mr. Musk disclosed that he had taken a large stake in Twitter—through April 25, when Twitter accepted his bid to take over the company. The Nasdaq Composite slid roughly 9% in that time.

Tesla’s tumble continued from there. First, Mr. Musk sold roughly 9.6 million Tesla shares, worth around $8.5 billion, in the days after striking the Twitter deal. Then, facing the continued erosion of Tesla’s stock price, he injected fresh doubt into the Twitter deal, saying that the planned acquisition was “temporarily on hold” citing concerns about fake accounts, though he added at the time that he remained committed to the acquisition.

Twitter has said it is proceeding with the transaction as agreed.

Mr. Musk, whose fortune is made up largely of Tesla stock, disclosed on Wednesday that he no longer plans to rely on a margin loan backed by Tesla shares to finance the Twitter deal. He committed additional equity instead, saying he was seeking additional outside financial backing.

The recent slide in Tesla’s stock price has prompted some, including Mr. Black, to press Tesla to repurchase its own shares. Buybacks can project confidence to investors and support stock prices by reducing a company’s share count. Tesla was sitting on roughly $17.5 billion in cash as of the first quarter.

Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment about whether it was considering buybacks. Asked in April about what Tesla plans to do with its cash long-term, Chief Financial Officer Zachary Kirkhorn said the company was investing in its new factories and products.

It couldn’t be learned whether the comments of some Tesla loyalists are affecting Mr. Musk’s thinking, or if they reflect the views of larger shareholders.

Earl Banning, a Dayton, Ohio, psychologist and Tesla investor, described himself as hesitant about Mr. Musk’s pursuit of Twitter.

“He’s already a lightning rod, and it makes him more of a lightning rod,” said Dr. Banning, a Tesla enthusiast whom Mr. Musk interacts with regularly on Twitter. That hasn’t spurred Dr. Banning to sell Tesla stock, though.

“Elon’s going to continue being Elon,” Dr. Banning said. “I feel that as a long-term shareholder, it will come back to where it should be because they’re executing. They are selling cars, and they’re profitable.”

Tesla reported a record $3.3 billion quarterly profit in the three months ended in March.

Twitter hasn’t been the only issue for Tesla investors to digest. Supply-chain bottlenecks and Covid-19 lockdowns in China have constrained the electric-car company’s sales. Tesla in April sold just 1,512 vehicles made at its Shanghai plant, down 94% from a year earlier.

Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect the company to deliver roughly 292,000 vehicles globally in the three months ending in June, down from 310,048 vehicles in the first quarter. That would mark Tesla’s first quarter-over-quarter decline in deliveries in more than two years.

Meanwhile, Mr. Musk has waded further into politics, saying that he expected partisan attacks against him and that he plans to vote Republican moving forward.

“Unless it is stopped, the woke mind virus will destroy civilization and humanity will never reached Mars,” Mr. Musk tweeted last week.

Last week, news publication Insider reported that SpaceX paid an unidentified flight attendant $250,000 in 2018 to settle a sexual misconduct claim against Mr. Musk, the company’s chief executive. Mr. Musk responded on Twitter, calling the accusations “utterly untrue.”

SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell told company staff in a subsequent email that she personally believed that allegations made against Mr. Musk were false. Neither she nor Mr. Musk addressed whether a settlement was paid. Ms. Shotwell said in the email that SpaceX doesn’t tolerate harassment of any kind.

Some Tesla devotees see opportunity in the share-price decline. John Stringer, who runs a Tesla owners club in Silicon Valley, said he has increased his Tesla holdings in recent weeks.

“This is kind of what comes with the territory,” Mr. Stringer said of Mr. Musk’s unpredictable tweeting and his corporate juggling act.

TechCrunch : Lidar exposes the remnants of an overgrown ancient civilization in

Lidar exposes the remnants of an overgrown ancient civilization in the Amazon
Image Credits: Prümers et al.
It’s Friday and the world is falling apart, so let’s just take a short mental health break with some interesting news out of the field of archaeology, where tech is enabling some fascinating new discoveries. A new lidar-powered analysis of land in the Amazon basin has provided evidence of a previously unknown urban center of “mind blowing” complexity.
To be clear, that doesn’t mean ancient aliens or long-lost technology, just that it far exceeds the expected levels of organization and population that scholars considered possible for Amazonians of 1,500 years ago.
“Nobody expected that kind of society in that region … pyramids 20 meters high,” said Heiko Prümers, of the German Archaeological Institute, in a video produced by Nature. “The whole region has been so densely habitated during the pre-hispanic time, that’s incredible to believe. There is a new civilization, new culture, waiting for us to study them.”

Until recently it was thought that the Amazon had nothing but smaller tribes until the arrival of Spanish and Portuguese explorers — a typically Eurocentric view increasingly challenged by new scholarship. In this case Prümers was intrigued by mounds called lomas, hidden beneath the vegetation but hinting at something greater. Excavations showed that these were not rubbish dumps (as some thought) but organized areas for graves, rites and other things indicative of a complex, hierarchical society.
But finding bumps on the ground under the canopy of a rainforest is far from easy, so in 2019 they set out to scan the area by helicopter, using lidar to reconstruct the contours of the surface below the trees. This technique has proved highly fruitful recently, with whole Mayan cities and even a kilometer-long artificial earthwork uncovered that way.

Image Credits: Prümers et al.

Lidar beams pass between the leaves and branches, bouncing back to provide a surprisingly detailed look at the height of the ground beneath. And more than ever this data can be quickly collected and analyzed to produce a 3D point cloud easily inspected for hidden structures.
What the team found was more than a few new lomas: platforms, huge pyramids, defensive structures, reservoirs and canals and more connecting what appeared to be hundreds of settlements of various sizes. This flies in the face of assumptions that local peoples were nomadic or foraging cultures, not sedentary and agricultural ones.

Lidar imagery of features discovered in the Casarabe city using lidar. Image Credits: Prümers et al.

The Casarabe culture, as it has been named following its discovery, remain mostly a mystery. After all, its existence was only recently confirmed — but this provides a starting point for further investigation.

“We need to be patient and wait for further excavations in those sites to be able to explain something of what we are seeing right now,” said Prümers — though it’s work of a scale and duration that may require him to bequeath it to his students. “For me, who has worked over these last 20, 25 years in that region, it’s sort of a dream coming true! To say at the end of my career that, yeah, we have a new culture? That’s nice, I admit that.”
As in so many domains, tech is an enabler (Prümers estimated it might have taken 400 years of digs to unearth all the things they found using lidar) but can never replace the hard work and expertise that humans bring to the equation. You can read the full paper (it’s open access) in Nature.

Link to Video : https://bit.ly/38ZrSBM

CB : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Clearway Energy Group Powers Up With $1.6B, SpaceX Receives Galactic-Sized Raise
Companies in the energy sector seem like the big winners this week. But startups in and around the enterprise software space also made a big splash with investors. Despite that, the chatter this week mostly focused on the large SpaceX raise because, well, it involves both space and Elon Musk.

1. Clearway Energy Group, $1.6B, renewable energy: The biggest round this week was a large corporate one involving San Francisco-based renewable energy developer Clearway Energy Group. France-based TotalEnergies SE bought half of Global Infrastructure Partners’ stake in the firm for a cool $1.6 billion investment. Clearway is one of the largest developers and operators of clean energy in the U.S. The company has more than 5 gigawatts of wind, solar and energy storage in operation currently. The move is another illustration of energy companies looking to diversify into newer green energy assets as carbon emissions become a top concern globally. The agreement represents TotalEnergies’ largest investment in U.S. renewables to date. In 2011, TotalEnergies bought a controlling stake in San Jose, California-based solar power company SunPower.

2. SpaceX, $1.5B, space travel: Remember when Elon Musk wasn’t in the news every day? Neither do we. This week, along with the neverending Twitter purchase, his SpaceX company made headlines after it was reported the company was raising at least $1.5 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. The Hawthorne, California-based company did not confirm the new round nor the new valuation of around $125 billion. SpaceX raised $1.9 billion in funding in April and has raised a total of $7.8 billion in funding, according to Crunchbase data. Previous investors in the company include NASA, Stack Capital, Bracket Capital and the United States Space Force, among others.

3. Semperis, $200M, cybersecurity: Private equity loves cybersecurity—just look at Thoma Bravo’s deal last summer for email security firm Proofpoint. This week, Hoboken, New Jersey-based Semperis saw some of that love, scooping up a $200 million Series C led by PE giant KKR. Semperis allows companies to secure their active directory both on-premise and in the cloud, as well as offering response tools for identity-focused incidents. Despite the downturn in both the private and public markets, cybersecurity has held strong with growing fears of ransomware and other attacks. Founded in 2014, Semperis has now raised $240 million, according to Crunchbase.

4. Clear Street, $165M, fintech: Now may not be the best of times for the market, but that doesn’t mean people don’t want better access to it. New York-based Clear Street is attempting to offer that after raising a $165 million Series B led by Prysm Capital at a valuation of $1.7 billion. Launched in 2018, Clear Street started with a prime brokerage platform for institutional investors and now will use the new funding to expand to serve fintechs, market makers and other professional traders. In a release, the company said its architecture processes more than $3 billion in daily trading volume. Clear Street has now raised nearly $460 million, according to Crunchbase.
That brings us to an odd four-way tie for the fifth-largest round of the week—with all raising $150 million.

5. (tied) Cribl, $150M, big data: Data observability was big this week with investors. San Francisco-based Cribl raised $150 million in Series D funding led by Tiger Global Management. Cribl’s platform allows users to understand the health of their data and control it. The new round comes less than a year after the company’s nearly $210 million Series C last summer and brings its total funding to $400 million, according to the company.

5. (tied) Firework, $150M, e-commerce: San Mateo, California-based livestreaming commerce and digital platform Firework closed a $150 million Series B led by the SoftBank Vision Fund 2. Founded in 2017, the company has now raised nearly $270 million, according to Crunchbase.

5. (tied) Mainspring Energy, $150M, energy: Menlo Park, California-based onsite power generation provider Mainspring Energy closed $150 million in the first stage of its Series E fundraise led by global growth equity investor Lightrock. Founded in 2010, according to Crunchbase data, the company has now raised nearly $330 million.

5. (tied) Motive, $150M, logistics: San Francisco-based Motive raised a $150 million Series E co-led by Insight Partners and Kleiner Perkins that values the automated operations platform developer at $2.85 million. Motive, formerly KeepTruckin, offers an AI-powered platform that helps improve driver safety and track fleet spending. The platform also offers other logistics and management tools. Founded in 2013, the company has now raised a total of nearly $570 million, according to Crunchbase data.

9. Monte Carlo, $135M, enterprise software: Another company in the data observability space to make the list this week is San Francisco-based Monte Carlo. The company, which tracks data reliability, closed a $135 million Series D led by IVP, valuing the company at $1.6 billion. Founded in 2019, the company has now raised more than $235 million, according to Crunchbase.

10. Booster, $125M, energy: San Mateo, California-based mobile energy delivery firm Booster raised more than $125 million in a Series D led by Rose Park Advisors. Founded in 2015, the company has now raised nearly $214 million, according to Crunchbase.

Big global deals
With the monster rounds raised by Clearway and SpaceX, only one round outside the U.S. broke into the top five rounds globally.
  • London-based Bloom Financial, which helps finance internet brands, closed a Series A worth nearly $380 million.

FT : Swimming pools under threat as operators fear industry collapse

Swimming pools under threat as operators fear industry collapse
Britain’s favourite physical pastime hit by surging energy prices

Swimming, the most popular physical activity in Britain, is at risk as soaring energy prices threaten the closure of hundreds of pools across the country.

It has led to desperate measures with gym and leisure centres lowering pool temperatures, turning down lights and urging swimmers to reduce showering times to save on energy costs to keep pools open.

With inflation hitting a 40-year high and little to help businesses in a government support package announced this week, swimming pool owners fear the sector could “collapse” in the next six months, said Huw Edwards, chief executive of industry association UKActive.

In a survey of nearly a third of the UK’s public pool operators this week, 85 per cent said they would be forced to reduce services in the next six months, while 63 per cent said they were likely to cut staff, according to UKActive, which promotes the interests of gyms and leisure centres.

Mark Sesnan, chief executive of leisure group GLL, which operates 135 facilities with public pools, said the energy crisis had created “a nightmare” and was “harder than the Covid challenge”.

Colin Waggett, chief executive of Third Space, a boutique gym operator in London, added the company was on a “week to week rollercoaster” as it tried to manage costs and maintain its high-end saunas, pools and spa facilities.

“If you offer a certain service and expectation, there is only so much you can do,” he said.

Even before the energy crisis, half of Britain’s 4,000-plus pools were under threat of closure, according to a pre-Covid-19 report by the country’s governing body Swim England.

Its 2019 report estimated around 1,800 pools would shut by 2030 as those built during a boom in the 1960s and 1970s became too old and expensive to upgrade.

With debts piling up following the pandemic and energy price rises of between 100 and 150 per cent since 2019, that closure number is likely to be much higher, said Swim England’s chief executive Jane Nickerson. “Every pool is at risk now,” she said.

It has prompted some gyms to trial a system that uses waste heat from data centres to keep pools warm. This diverts heat generated by data processing machines into swimming pool boilers.

Nickerson said this could be a “game-changer” as data centre owners could offer them to pools at no additional cost to their businesses.

Eight industrial-size data boxes, which provide cloud storage and other digital information, could heat a 25-metre pool, Nickerson added.

Many swimming pool operators have already negotiated energy price rises with their local council backers, but anticipate further increases as “wet-side” activities that are typically lossmaking have recovered faster than gym or sports sessions, which would normally subsidise pools.

In the case of GLL, its energy bill has increased 125 per cent compared with 2019, meaning that it will be £15mn over budget on energy this year, chief executive Sesnan said. This is too much of a strain for a business that only turned a £3mn profit pre-Covid-19.

Consequently, GLL is considering introducing an energy surcharge of up to £1.50 on swimming prices to make up for shortfalls. “We’ve calculated that for every person who uses the pool, it is somewhere between £1 and £2 extra on the energy bill every visit.”

Many pool operators have also turned down air and shower temperatures, replaced old bulbs with LED lighting, ensured pool covers are used at night to retain warmth and improved lagging on pipes, but most say these measures only offer marginal gains.

Ivan Horsfall-Turner, chief executive of Freedom Leisure, which provides public sports facilities, said its energy costs had doubled, forcing the company to reduce temperatures of its swimming pools a 10th of a degree at a time to help customers acclimatise.

“We are still recovering from Covid in terms of getting our income and throughput back, so the last thing we want to do is put our customers off,” he said.

Some pool operators have medium term plans that involve investment in renewable energy sources such as ground source heat pumps and solar panels, but this requires capital that businesses emerging from long months of closure during Covid-19 and steep restart costs do not have.

Even gyms without pools are not immune. Alex Wood, chief financial officer of PureGym, said rising energy costs were “a challenging backdrop for everyone right now”.

James Balfour, chief executive of rival group 1Rebel, said he expected “a lot of consolidation” as inflation hit weak businesses. The fitness studio chain has bought two smaller companies out of administration in the last two months, he added.

Ice rinks are also acutely challenged, said Kirsty Cumming, chief executive of Community Leisure UK.

But it is the swimming pool operators that are likely to be hit hardest, said Sesnan. Unless public swimming pools “get a subsidy from the government or the cost [of energy] comes down, it is inevitable that we will have to close”.

“You can always work out in a gym by opening the windows and turning the air conditioning off, [but] it’s an existential threat to swimming.”

FT : Mercedes considers culling F1 engine client

Mercedes considers culling F1 engine client
Team that supplies McLaren, Williams and Aston Martin says leasing to rivals is no longer “compelling”

Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff said new spending rules have put one of its three Formula One customers at risk of being culled, because the German manufacturer is no longer earning “substantial amounts” from producing engines for its rivals

“Unfortunately, the business of leasing engines is not compelling and interesting because the [governing body] FIA has put in a certain limit that you can charge to your customers, in order to protect the smaller teams,” Wolff said, adding that the Mercedes team itself accounted for the bulk of its profits, which amounted to just under £14mn last year.

Mercedes supplies rivals McLaren, Aston Martin and Williams with engines designed by its high-performance unit in Brixworth, UK. All teams have been subject to increasingly restrictive cost caps over the past two seasons, as F1 owner Liberty Media seeks to narrow the financial gap between the most and least successful outfits.

After winning eight constructor’s championships in a row, Mercedes has struggled with its car this season, losing pace to frontrunners Red Bull and Ferrari. Its clients also faced difficulties in getting ahead of their closest rivals in the middle of the pack during some early races.

Wolff said the production of two engines apiece for three other teams was a burden for Mercedes, whose engineers have been preoccupied with developing upgrades to the cars for its drivers Lewis Hamilton and George Russell.

“I’d rather have six [client cars], push the development further down the line and then make two engines less, because you need to produce two less plus two spares for every team,” he said.

“In an ideal world, I would maybe see us plus two [customers], so actually downsize a bit,” he added, but did not elaborate on which client Mercedes was likely to drop. The relationship between Mercedes and McLaren is the oldest of the three, dating back decades, albeit with a six-year gap.

Wolff’s comments come as Mercedes’ German rivals Porsche and Audi — both VW subsidiaries — are poised to enter F1, in time for rule changes in 2026 that would increase the amount of electric power generation in cars.

One of the VW-owned brands could team up with McLaren, depriving Mercedes of a leasing customer, according to people familiar with the plans.

Speaking before Mercedes’ better showing on the track in Barcelona last week, Wolff also played down Mercedes’ ability to compete for another constructor’s championship this year. “We just need to come back and consolidate third place and then just slowly crawl back,” he said.

While Mercedes has had to contend with a “bouncing” problem on its cars, rivals Red Bull and Ferrari “have continued to develop their car without any of this effect”, Wolff said, and would likely remain further ahead.

>>> US CLose Dow +1.76% S&P +2.47% Nasdaq +3.33% Russell +2.70%

Closing Stock Market Summary: Market rallies into long weekend

The stock market finished a volatile week on a firmly higher note with the S&P 500 (+2.5%) and Nasdaq (+3.3%) rising for the third consecutive day while the Dow (+1.8%) logged its sixth advance in a row, snapping its longest weekly losing streak since 1932.

Equities recorded the bulk of their gains during the first hour of action, adding to their big gains in late trade. The Nasdaq maintained its lead throughout the day while the S&P 500 and Dow returned into positive territory for the month.

Today's economic data was headlined by the Personal Income/Outlays report for April. The report showed a smaller than expected increase in income and a larger than expected increase in spending, but the yr/yr deceleration in the PCE Price Index was viewed as a silver lining that could signal an inflationary peak.

All eleven sectors spent the day in positive territory with six groups gaining at least 2.0%. Top-weighted technology (+3.4%) spent the day near the top of the leaderboard, alongside the consumer discretionary sector (+3.5%). The relative strength in these groups was notable since technology and retail stocks have been among the worst performers during the market's recent slide to levels not seen since early 2021.

Autodesk (ADSK 211.38, +19.75, +10.3%) finished atop the tech sector after beating Q1 expectations and issuing mixed guidance for FY23 while top-weighted components like Apple (AAPL 149.64, +5.86, +4.1%) and NVIDIA (NVDA 188.11, +9.60, +5.4%) also made notable contributions to the rally. NVIDIA's strength helped the PHLX Semiconductor Index (+4.0%) finish the day ahead of the tech sector, though both groups gained 8.1% for the week.

Retail stocks in the consumer discretionary sector were also a notable source of strength even though quarterly reports from the group have shown continued concerns about costs eating into margins. However, Ulta Beauty (ULTA 425.08, +47.12, +12.5%) finished ahead of other discretionary components after reporting better than expected results and guidance while Gap (GPS 11.60, +0.48, +4.3%) finished with a solid gain despite plunging nearly 15.0% at the open in reaction to its Q1 miss and below-consensus guidance. On the bright side, management indicated that performance is expected to improve in the second half of the year.

The improved sentiment in the market masked continued strength in the energy sector (+1.7%), as crude oil returned to its May high. The energy sector gained 8.1% for the week, extending its May advance to 16.9% while crude oil climbed $0.64 or 0.6% to $114.77/bbl, rising $4.72 or 4.3% for the week.

Treasuries had a mixed, but largely little changed, showing on Friday. The Treasury complex climbed for the third week in a row, with the 10-yr yield slipping one basis point to 2.74% today. The benchmark yield surrendered five basis points this week, pausing just above its 50-day moving average (2.73%).

Reviewing today's economic data:

  • Personal income increased 0.4% month-over-month (consensus 0.5%) following an unrevised 0.5% increase in March. Personal spending rose 0.9% month-over-month (consensus 0.6%) following an upwardly revised 1.4% increase (from 1.1%) in March. The PCE Price Index was up 0.2% month-over-month ( consensus 0.3%) and the core-PCE Price Index, which excludes food and energy, was up 0.3% month-over-month, as expected.
    • The key takeaway from the report is that there was a moderation in the year-over-year rates for the price indexes, which will support the peak inflation narrative. The PCE Price Index was up 6.3% year-over-year, versus 6.6% in March, and the core-PCE Price Index, the one the Fed watches most closely, was up 4.9% year-over-year, versus 5.2% in March.
  • The final May reading for the University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment fell to 58.4 from the preliminary reading of 59.1. The final reading for April was 65.2. In May 2021, the Index of Consumer Sentiment stood at 82.9.
    • The key takeaway from the report is that inflation concerns have negatively impacted views on buying conditions for houses and durables, and the future outlook for the economy.
  • The advance goods trade deficit narrowed to $105.90 bln in April from a revised deficit of $125.90 bln (from -$125.30 bln) in March.
  • Advance Retail Inventories increased by 0.7% in April after increasing a revised 3.0% (from 2.0%) in March.
  • Advance Wholesale Inventories increased by 2.1% in April after increasing a revised 2.7% (from 2.3%) in March.

Bond and equity markets will be closed on Monday for Memorial Day. On Tuesday, the market will receive the March FHFA Housing Price Index (prior 2.1%) and March S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index (consensus 20.0%; prior 20.2%) at 9:00 ET, followed by May Chicago PMI (consensus 55.5; prior 58.5) at 9:45 ET, and May Consumer Confidence (Briefing.com consensus 103.7; prior 107.3) at 10:00 ET.

  • Dow Jones Industrial Average -8.6% YTD
  • S&P 400 -10.6% YTD
  • S&P 500 -12.8% YTD
  • Russell 2000 -15.9% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite -22.5% YTD