Barrons : Uranium Is Back in Demand. Russia and Climate Change Are Why.

Uranium Is Back in Demand. Russia and Climate Change Are Why.

An accident at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan 12 years ago led countries around the world to question the safety of nuclear energy. But atomic energy has been re-embraced by some nations since then. And the potential loss of uranium supplies from Russia, after its invasion of Ukraine a year ago, served as a wake-up call to many who had lost confidence in the power source.

Uranium prices peaked at nearly $64 a pound in April 2022, as “heavy financial buying and other demand pushed the market up quickly” following Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine, says Jonathan Hinze, president at nuclear-fuel consultancy UxC.

Russia is a “major player in both uranium conversion and enrichment,” and the market has seen a “bifurcation” between the West and Russia, says Justin Huhn, publisher and founder of Uranium Insider. This situation has “large implications in the fuel cycle, and especially for uranium demand in the coming years.”

A long-lasting ramification of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is that Western utilities will be highly unlikely return to the same level of business with Russia as they have had historically, Huhn says. The West could also sanction the import of Russian uranium fuel or fuel services, and Russia may decide to cut off the West.

The U.S. gets about 15% of its physical uranium and 24% of its enrichment of uranium from Russia, says Huhn, while Europe relies on Russia for about 20% of its uranium and almost 30% of its enrichment needs.

On April 18, 2022, uranium hit its highest weekly price since just before March 11, 2011, when the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan was hit by a tsunami caused by a massive earthquake, Hinze notes. Fukushima was the worst nuclear disaster in a quarter-century.

The high 2022 uranium price didn’t hold. But “thanks to improved equity markets that have allowed financials like the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (UUT.Canada) and Yellow Cake (YCDA.UK) to raise new money, demand for spot uranium has increased in January and February, leading to prices now nearing $52,” after starting out the year around $48, Hinze says.

“It is amazing how far the industry has moved past the Fukushima accident,” he says. The 2010s were “mostly a lost decade for the nuclear markets.” But since 2020, there has been a “clear rebirth in this sector as countries are pushing for net-zero carbon emissions.”

Huhn says the majority of the public in Japan are now in favor of restarting nuclear plants, showing “just how dramatically sentiment around nuclear energy has shifted in recent years.” He points out that “in terms of human fatalities per unit of energy produced, nuclear energy is the safest form of energy ever conceived.” Nuclear energy also produces an “incredibly small amount of waste relative to the immense amount of energy created,” with that waste highly regulated and safely stored.

Huhn expects to see further upward pressure on uranium prices, products, and services this year and beyond, with increasing volume in the long-term uranium contract market likely to continue to move long-term uranium prices higher.

The uranium spot market will see an “outsize positive influence by virtue of secondary demand from financial interests”—in particular, the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, says Huhn. Uranium Insider, which has a position in the trust, sees it as an “attractive, unleveraged way to play the upside potential” in uranium prices.

The present market is tight, with a deficit in the annual amount of uranium consumed versus annual production, accompanied by the start of a “robust long-term contracting cycle for nuclear utilities,” Huhn says. “The table is set for many years of a supportive environment for rising uranium prices.”

Barrons : This Big French Caterer Is Expanding Its Menu. Consider the Stock.

This Big French Caterer Is Expanding Its Menu. Consider the Stock.

French catering giant Sodexo is once again facing headwinds after the reopening of offices, universities, and sports venues helped it bounce back from the coronavirus pandemic.

The stock (ticker: SW.France) rose 12.1% in the past year, but has slumped almost 5% in the past month to 87.96 euros ($93.44). The likely culprit is investor disappointment that 2023 guidance was only in line with forecasts amid the prospect of a recession and spiraling inflation.

Much of the impact of a downturn has already been priced into the stock. Sabrina Blanc, an analyst at Société Générale, wrote in a recent note that Sodexo has hiked its prices 5% to 6%, which will help mitigate the rising cost of ingredients.

The company’s businesses are varied—from operating the expensive Jules Verne restaurant in the Eiffel Tower to providing food at events like the Super Bowl. And Sodexo is expanding its services beyond catering. It is bundling services by combining office management, maintenance, and cleaning into contracts in order to become a one-stop business partner.

This sets it apart from rivals and makes it harder for clients to directly compare prices. Catering accounts for less than 60% of group revenue, according to Michael Field, an analyst at Morningstar , who says this has fallen from almost 80% in 2005. “There are also several other benefits from this approach, as integrated contracts, by virtue of their increased complexity, are generally longer in length than single-service contracts,” he wrote in a note.

He cites Sodexo’s 10-year contract with Rio Tinto, effectively running a remote mining station in Australia.

These integrated contracts also help the company retain repeat business, which Blanc says reached a high of 94.5% at the end of last year.

Andre Juillard, an analyst at Deutsche Bank, estimates that the stock could increase 19.3%, to €105. Morningstar’s Field has a €111 price target. “Sodexo estimates that the entire market for outsourced food services is only about 50% penetrated, which leaves ample room for the company to increase market share,” he says.

The business has a market value of €12.7 billion and employs 421,991 staff members. It fetches a multiple of 14.4 times this year’s expected earnings and is valued in line with its peers.

In October, it posted operating profits of €1 billion for the year ended in August 2022, an increase from €339 million in the same period the year before. Revenue in 2022 was €21.1 billion, up from €17.4 billion in 2021.

“We are now back up to our 2019 activity levels,” CEO and Chairwoman Sophie Bellon told Barron’s in an email. “Fiscal 2022 was a turning point with a return to positive net new business and record retention.”

She added the Sodexo has had a strong start to the year, and that “we are on the right track to deliver long-term profitable growth and reach our ambition to become the world leader in sustainable food and valued experiences.”

Further growth will come from Sodexo’s small but successful benefits-and-rewards division—customers buy food vouchers to encourage staff members to return to work, and also offer them as rewards for employees.

It saw organic growth of 23.4% over the first quarter. And despite constituting only 4% of group revenue, it contributes about 25% to the group’s operating profit.

“While local and regional players operate in this sector, there are just two firms with global capabilities in this extremely scalable business,” says Field. “It’s another differentiator and a strong source of growth for Sodexo.”

Barrons : C3.ai Stock Rallies as Results Top Guidance

C3.ai Stock Rallies as Results Top Guidance

C3.ai AI +33.65% shares spiked Friday after the provider of artificial intelligence software posted better-than-expected earnings.

Investor interest in C3.ai has surged in recent weeks as the market scrambles for ways to play the emerging artificial intelligence trend.

Built by Siebel Systems founder Thomas Siebel, C3.ai provides AI applications for large businesses and government agencies. The company recently announced C3 Generative AI for Enterprise Search, a tool that includes technology from ChatGPT creator Open AI. The new search tool will be included in the company’s applications starting this spring.

In an interview with Barron’s, Siebel said he sees his company as an aggregator of AI technology, rather than the primary innovator. The CEO sees Microsoft and Open AI, Google, and IBM as the key technology developers. “We just take advantage of whoever has the hottest technology, and take advantage of that, like we do in encryption and machine learning services,” he says.

Siebel says the company’s secret sauce is the “orchestration layer” that pulls together applications and services from various providers into a coherent whole.

Siebel says C3.ai is finding widespread enthusiasm for its new search tool, which uses a Google-style search box interface to access content from enterprise applications that are often harder to master. The company is including the new search capability in all C3.ai applications, but Siebel notes the search feature works with third-party apps as well. The company could make the tool available to firm that aren’t running any C3.ai applications, he says, but concedes “we have not figured it out yet.”

For its fiscal third quarter ended Jan. 31., C3.ai (ticker: AI) posted revenue of $66.7 million, down 4% from a year ago, but ahead of the company’s guidance range of $63 million to $65 million, and above the Street consensus forecast at $64.3 million. On an adjusted basis, the company recorded a loss from operations of $15 million, narrower than the forecast range of a loss between $25 million and $29 million.

C3.ai shares surged 29% to $27.52 in midday trading Friday.

The company said it has successfully shifted most customers to a subscription-based business mode. Subscription revenue in the quarter was $57 million, or 85% of overall revenue. Non-GAAP gross margin was 76%. Remaining performance obligations were $403.2 million.

“We are seeing tailwinds from improved business optimism and increased interest in applying C3 AI solutions to address an increasing range of applications across a broad range of industries,” Siebel said in an earlier statement. “The overall business sentiment appears to be improving. This is a dramatic change from what we experienced in mid-2022.”

The company said it remains on track to be cash positive and non-GAAP profitable by the end of fiscal 2024. Siebel says the company’s high gross margins—in the 78% to 80% range—suggest a clear path to profitability as revenues rise and the company spends less on a percentage basis on sales, marketing, and R&D. The company, unlike other tech companies, isn’t cutting staff, and continues to hire, he adds.

For the fiscal fourth quarter, C3.ai projects revenue of between $70 million and $72 million, a little ahead of Wall Street at $69.9 million, with a non-GAAP loss from operations of $24 million to $28 million.

For the full year, the company now sees revenue of between $264 million and $266 million, with a non-GAAP loss from operations of between $69 million and $73 million. Previous guidance called for revenue of $255 million to $270 million, and a loss ranging from $90 million to $98 million.

As for the recent explosion of interest in AI software, Siebel says the story is just getting started: “We’re in the first half of the first inning and the first guy is at bat.”

Barrons : Elon Musk’s Master Plan Was Short on Details. That Makes It Hard to Va

Elon Musk’s Master Plan Was Short on Details. That Makes It Hard to Value Tesla Stock.

Tesla TSLA +3.61% is trading “more like just another car maker,” wrote Bespoke Investment Group this past week. I don’t think it was a compliment. On Wednesday evening, the company held a new investor day at its equally new Texas Gigafactory. On Thursday, shares sagged 6%.

That’s not how these things are supposed to work. Investor days aren’t a must, like filing an annual report. Companies do it to generate enthusiasm for their strategies and products. Rapturous applause in the moment is good, but a pop in the stock price is better.

In the decade through 2021, most days for Tesla (ticker: TSLA) felt like investor days. The stock gained 18,000%. The company stuck to shareholder meetings and events themed around technology—like a battery day and an AI day. Then, last year, rising interest rates shook frothy stocks, and Tesla dropped 65%. So, on Jan. 2, the company announced a day just for equity enthusiasts.

Speculation began immediately that Tesla would give details on a new, cheap car—maybe not Honda Civic cheap, but Accord-ish, say $30,000. That didn’t happen—hence the disappointment. In February, CEO Elon Musk tweet-promised to share his Master Plan 3, and he did just that. Sort of.

Tesla will help create a sustainable energy economy using 240 terawatt hours of power storage and 30 TWh of renewable generation, which will need $10 trillion in investment, equal to 10% of the world’s economy, which is a bargain, Tesla says, compared with what the gasoline-chugging economy costs. Also, there will be robots—lots of them. Tesla showed a video of its humanoid Optimus, but didn’t offer a live demonstration. Eventually, “I think we might exceed a 1-to-1 ratio of robots to humans,” said Musk. “It’s not even clear what an economy means at that point.”

It’s unclear, all right.

If robots and cars seem an odd fit, Musk points out that robots will work in the factories and be sold for home use, and he calls cars robots with wheels. Speaking of wheels, Tesla said its long-delayed Cybertruck is coming later this year. It said that its new, broader vehicle-production platform will cut costs by 50%.

One investment bank said that “details were limited.” Did it not hear the part about robots outnumbering humans? Another called the presentation “short on specifics.” A third used the word “letdown.”

Tesla shared its first master plan in 2006 and its second in 2016, the year it bought home solar player SolarCity. The second plan called for a flourishing solar business, a vast menu of new vehicles, and fully autonomous driving, with a cash-generating network of robotaxis. So far, the solar business has looked uneven; two vehicle models make up the bulk of sales, which are nonetheless growing quickly; and the other stuff hasn’t happened yet.

Bespoke’s point on Tesla trading like a regular car maker is that statistically, its average rolling one-year correlation to the share prices of Ford Motor F +4.22% (F), General Motors GM +3.74% (GM), Stellantis STLA +2.62% (STLA), and Toyota Motor TM +1.86% (TM) has hit its highest level since 2016. But investors can’t spend their rolling correlations, and Tesla’s 55% gain so far this year, even after Thursday’s dip, easily beats those other stocks.

The question now is how to put a price on Master Plan 3, and how much of it is already reflected in the shares. Adam Jonas at Morgan Stanley is bullish. The most important part of the new plan is immense vertical integration and vast scale that will give Tesla an edge on production costs. “In a race to the bottom, we seriously question how the competition can keep up,” Jonas writes. His price-target math is based on—deep breath now—six parts.

The car business is worth $117 a share, reckons Jonas. That’s based in part on deliveries rising to 7.2 million units in 2030, from 1.3 million last year. Margins, based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda, will hit 20%, versus 11% or so now for Toyota. The second part is robotaxis, valued at $9 a share, based on 425,000 vehicles earning $1.70 a mile by 2030. Then, there’s $29 for Tesla as a supplier to other manufacturers, and $26 for the energy business, and $8 for insurance. Finally, there’s $32 for network services, or subscriptions generating an average of $80 a month by 2030 from 18.9 million users.

Added up and rounded down, that’s $220, suggesting near-term upside of another 15% for the stock.

My own valuation model consists of 32 parts starting with having no idea and ending with wondering whether Optimus will carry me out to my robotaxi. I don’t pretend that pricing such futuristic upheaval is easy. One prognosticator called Tesla stock “too high” less than three years ago, then six months ago said the company would pass the combined value of Apple (AAPL) and oil monopoly Saudi Arabian Oil (ARAMCO.Saudi Arabia), implying that Tesla’s stock price will multiply seven times. Some turnabout—and that guy runs the company.

Let’s turn to nuts. Hormel Foods stock (HRL) has fallen for nine straight days. It’s down 12% year to date, versus a rise of a few percent for the broad market. On Thursday, J.P. Morgan cut the meatpacker to Underweight from Neutral. Hormel has said it’s overstocked on Bacon Bits, Spam, Compleats microwave meals, ribs, and products from the Planters business that it bought from Kraft Heinz in 2021.

The nut business has suffered a double whammy, says JPM. Shoppers have been trading down from lucrative cashews and fancy mixes to workaday peanuts. And in peanuts, Planters hasn’t been holding its own. Hormel is expanding production of Spam and Planters to add packaging options. JPM wonders whether this is wise. It points out that while Hormel has relatively low leverage, it isn’t as low as it used to be, and years of dividend hikes have left payouts as a percentage of profits well above the group average.

This all comes after Mr. Peanut starred in his own Super Bowl ad. If you can’t persuade today’s consumers with an anthropomorphic legume in top hat and monocle, I’m out of ideas.

FT : Plastic ingestion by humans and animals altering cells, scientists say

Plastic ingestion by humans and animals altering cells, scientists say
Study identifies new stomach disease in seabirds caused by microplastics

Alarming new evidence is emerging of the potential harm caused by pervasive plastic pollution, with significant levels of microscopic plastic particles discovered in many human organs and a new disease identified in seabirds.

On average people now consume around 5 grammes of microplastics a week — ingested in food and drink and inhaled by breathing polluted air — Professor Philip Demokritou of Rutgers University told the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting in Washington.

“What is really alarming is that microplastics enter cells and interfere with cell nuclei, which raises concerns about potential DNA damage,” he said. “Another alarming example is that they can interfere with the digestion and absorption of important nutrients.”

Separately on Friday scientists at the Natural History Museum in London announced the discovery of a new disease in seabirds caused solely by the ingestion of plastic. They have called the condition plasticosis — a fibrotic disease caused by small pieces of plastic inflaming the digestive tract. Persistent inflammation damages the tissues, which become scarred and deformed.

Studying flesh-footed shearwaters on Australia’s Lord Howe Island, they found that the proventriculus — the first part of the birds’ stomach — had widespread scarring. Birds that ingested more plastic had more scarring.

“While these birds can look healthy on the outside, they’re not doing well on the inside,” said Alex Bond, the museum’s curator in charge of birds. “This study is the first time that stomach tissue has been investigated in this way and shows that plastic consumption can cause serious damage to these birds’ digestive system.”

Affected birds become more vulnerable to infection and parasites, while they lose some capacity to digest food and absorb vitamins.

At the AAAS meeting Luisa Campagnolo of the University of Rome Tor Vergata outlined recent research by Italian scientists who found tiny plastic particles from various sources in human placentas collected from six women with normal pregnancies.

Another study identified plastic particles “not just in the placental tissue but also in the meconium, the baby’s first faeces — meaning that the particles could cross the placenta into the foetus”, Campagnolo said

“A huge number of different types of plastic particles were identified,” she added. “The most abundant is PVC but basically all other plastic types that are part of everyday consumer products were present.”

Craig Bennett, chief executive of The Wildlife Trusts, the UK conservation group, said the research “underlines my fear that we are witnessing just the very beginning of the plastic problem. Our seas, rivers and countryside are already plagued by plastic pollution. Research shows how humans and wildlife consume microplastics through eating, drinking and breathing.”

FT : Artificial intelligence: in earnings calls, AI is everything, everywhere

Artificial intelligence: in earnings calls, AI is everything, everywhere
In their rush to show off AI capabilities, companies open themselves up to possible inaccuracies

Banks are rightly wary of nascent artificial intelligence technology. Across the rest of the corporate world, however, executives are tripping over themselves to prove their exposure.

Commercial use of AI will supposedly drive efficiencies, improve data analysis and eliminate underperforming staff from the workplace. San Francisco start-up OpenAI has attempted to bring that future closer by introducing tools that let businesses integrate its AI-powered chatbot. Grocery delivery company Instacart plans to create a search engine that answers user food queries. Social media company Snap has launched a chatbot for users who pay a $4-per-month subscription.

Since OpenAI released ChatGPT in late November, companies in every sector have been forced to consider their own AI plans. Data from Sentieo compiled by the FT shows that mentions of AI in investor calls across 9,000 global companies reached a new high in February as they released earnings for the final three months of 2022.


Tech companies are at particular pains to prove their research and development teams have not been left behind. In a call with investors last month, PayPal said it was deploying AI capabilities in its checkout service. This week, Samsara, an internet of things company, said its AI models could analyse driver behaviours and road conditions in real time to show the leading causes of preventable accidents.

Other connections seem more speculative. Fast-food chain Wendy’s told investors it was testing “vision AI” to improve orders. Radio and podcasting company iHeartMedia claimed to be an early adopter of AI, which it said it used to enhance music programming.

In their rush to show off AI capabilities, companies open themselves up to possible inaccuracies. ChatGPT’s creators admit that it can be misleading in its impression of precision. The chatbot has a habit of giving incorrect answers. Businesses may want to use the tech for attention but AI is an experiment, not a replacement for core business functions.

FT : Saudi Arabia looks at tax relief for multinationals relocating HQs

Saudi Arabia looks at tax relief for multinationals relocating HQs
Lack of clarity on regulatory details from Riyadh creates ‘fear and panic’ among executives

Multinationals that relocate their regional headquarters to Saudi Arabia this year with the aim of securing lucrative government contracts would be “likely” to receive tax relief, said the kingdom’s investment minister, as executives fear they could be taxed in more than one jurisdiction.

Many executives said they were still uncertain about the details of the tax regime two years after they were informed of the relocation deadline. Several said a key concern was that, in the absence of a taxation accord between Riyadh and other Gulf states that could fall under the regional HQ’s oversight, subsidiaries’ profits could be taxed twice.

“So the moment you designate that entity as your regional head office, all of your regional profits could then be taxable in Saudi Arabia,” said one executive. “That has caused fear and panic across the patch.”

Investment minister Khalid al-Falih said an announcement would be made soon to clarify the regulations. Saudi Arabia, the world’s top oil exporter and the Middle East’s largest economy, announced its regional headquarters programme in 2021, sending shockwaves through the United Arab Emirates, where most regional corporate head offices are based.

“It is business as usual for them in Saudi Arabia and outside Saudi Arabia,” Falih told the Financial Times. Operations outside Saudi Arabia “will be taxed in those entities’ country of operations. They will not be intermingled or mixed with the regional headquarters,” he said.

“The guiding principle is that the RHQ special purpose vehicle, which will be created in Saudi Arabia, will be only taxed for the limited — almost nothing — profits that they make within the RHQ . . . Most likely the limited income by the RHQ SPV will be granted tax relief,” Falih said.

The regional headquarters scheme is part of an ambitious plan to make Saudi Arabia less reliant on oil revenues by transforming the kingdom into a trade and finance hub. State-owned enterprises, which dominate the economy, are set to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on new projects over the next decade, attracting multinationals to the kingdom.

About 80 companies, including Unilever and Siemens, have already been granted licences to move their regional headquarters to the kingdom, with many expected to be based in Riyadh’s King Abdullah Financial District. PepsiCo announced earlier this month that it had relocated its Middle East chief executive’s office to the kingdom.

The programme underscored the growing competition with the UAE, which for years served as a regional hub for multinationals with its laissez-faire approach to business, socially liberal lifestyle and hub airports.

The UAE, which will start imposing a corporate tax of 9 per cent in May, has responded with a range of incentives to attract companies. Saudi Arabia, which levies a 20 per cent corporate income tax, has promised its own incentives, including exemptions on visa limits and recruitment quotas for Saudi nationals for 10 years. But they have been overshadowed by the uncertainties on taxation.

Many companies feel they have no choice but to move if they want to win lucrative government contracts in Saudi Arabia, the fastest growing G20 economy with billions earmarked for spending on mega projects such as the Neom new city project.

The taxation uncertainty is “paralysing some people from doing things. It was slowing us down. And then we just talked about it today and said guys, we’re going to go ahead and set up that entity in Riyadh,” the executive said.

Falih said the kingdom did not want to saddle the companies with additional costs.

“We realised that we had to do everything we can through policy and regulation to ensure that the companies will not incur additional risks or costs from the alternative jurisdictions for managing their regional operations, and the biggest one of course is taxation,” he said.

But requirements for all senior executives to be resident in Saudi Arabia had been expanded to include demands that they rent accommodation and are paid salaries into a bank based in the kingdom, said one consultant.

“It’s getting more onerous,” he said. “Every month it’s becoming more expensive to rent accommodation and office space as others move in — there just isn’t enough supply.” Securing international schooling for children has also posed a challenge.

One executive said their company had set up a Saudi regional head office, to oversee operations in other Gulf states such as Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar. The UAE office would continue as a regional headquarters for the wider Middle East.

To qualify as a regional HQ under the Saudi plans, the base must have oversight of operations in at least two other states. But Michael Bessey of consultants Albright Stonebridge Group said the latest information from the investment ministry was that Saudi-based regional headquarters should serve as a base for the entire region.

“The requirements are becoming stricter — a company that continues to call Dubai a regional headquarters for [Middle East and north Africa] would probably not be acceptable,” said Bessey. “So companies need to think about how they describe their UAE offices moving forward.”

FT : Supreme Court to hear test case over sewage in UK waterways

Supreme Court to hear test case over sewage in UK waterways
Challenge to United Utilities one of a number of legal claims against water companies

One of Britain’s largest privatised water companies will appear in the Supreme Court on Monday in a landmark case where it will argue it should not be held liable by private landowners and individuals for sewage released into UK waterways.

The legal challenge is one of a number faced by water companies and the government as anger mounts over the mixture of storm water and raw sewage that is pouring into rivers and coastal waters, threatening human and environmental health.

United Utilities argues that the owners of the 129-year-old Manchester Ship Canal cannot seek redress for the release of “untreated foul water” without permission, and that only regulators can take action.

“This case has never been about avoiding accountability,” the water company said. “The aim was to clarify the regulatory position regarding storm overflows.”

Although the High Court has previously ruled in favour of United Utilities, the Environmental Law Foundation, supported by the Good Law Project, is intervening to support the Manchester canal, which is owned by Peel Ports, to try to overturn the decision.

“This case will have significant ramifications for how we can hold water companies to account — by opening up the opportunity for us to sue them and force them to stop polluting our rivers with huge amounts of raw sewage,” said Emma Dearnaley, legal director at the Good Law Project.

Colm Gibson, head of Berkeley Research Group’s economic regulation practice, said that in addition to fines and prosecutions, utility companies were increasingly vulnerable to class action claims.

“Customers are physically connected to companies’ networks and they have standard structures for charging households, making it easier to pass the legal tests for defining who is included in a ‘class’,” he said.

Gibson cited as precedent a £600mn claim faced by BT for allegedly overcharging 2.3mn landline-only customers.

Leigh Day, which is also running the “dieselgate” case against a number of car manufacturers in the High Court, has announced it is preparing claims to be brought in the Competition Appeals Tribunal on behalf of UK water bill payers.

It alleges that water companies are “unlawfully discharging large volumes of raw sewage into England’s waterways, and customers are being overcharged as a result”.

Fideres, an economic consultancy, has also appealed to the Competition and Markets Authority arguing that water companies have exploited the inability of consumers to switch away by providing poor quality services.

It argues that water companies may have overcharged consumers by £1.1bn over the past six years for sewage treatment services that had not been provided since the effluent was dumped rather than treated.

In another case, the Good Law Project is aiming to compel the government to rewrite its plan to reduce sewage discharged during periods of high rainfall. It alleges that the government’s current plan is unlawful as it gives water companies until 2050 to improve storm overflows and put a stop to industrial-scale sewage dumping, while all but excluding coastal waters from protection.

The slew of legal cases threatens to overhaul the regulatory landscape for water companies, which have already been forced to increase transparency as a result of previous court rulings.

In 2012, Yorkshire Water and United Utilities went to the European Court of Justice to claim that England’s water monopolies were private businesses, not “public authorities”, and should be exempt from disclosing when or how much sewage they were releasing.

The UK government supported their “right to secrecy” but FishLegal, a fishermen’s charity, ultimately won. A second case by FishLegal in 2015 forced water companies to open up to freedom of information-style requests.

Faced with public pressure, regulators the Environment Agency and Ofwat have also been setting tougher targets, raising the possibility of claims for not meeting them, lawyers said.

The regulators also have long-running investigations into whether companies have complied with environmental permits, which allow a certain amount of sewage to pour into watercourses during times of heavy rain.

Water UK, which represents the industry, said: “Water companies are focused on delivering against targets set by government and regulators. It is for them to decide on the shape and pace of company obligations.”

FT : Altria exits vaping group Juul after stake plummets in value

Altria exits vaping group Juul after stake plummets in value
Marlboro maker’s $12.8bn investment is now worth just $250mn after legal setbacks

Marlboro maker Altria has swapped its minority stake in Juul Labs for intellectual property rights to some of the e-cigarette company’s heated tobacco prototypes, ending an investment which plummeted in value from $12.8bn five years ago following regulatory and legal setbacks.

The Virginia-based cigarette maker said in a statement after market close on Friday that it had exchanged its 35 per cent stake in Juul for a “non-exclusive, irrevocable global license” for some of Juul’s heated tobacco intellectual property. Despite years of work developing a heated tobacco device, Juul never launched a heat-not-burn product.

Altria’s decision to exit its investment comes after Juul reached a costly settlement for 5,000 lawsuits alleging that Juul fuelled a teenage “vaping epidemic” and the US Food and Drug Administration banned Juul’s products as part of its sweeping review of 6.7mn e-cigarette products.

At the end of last year Altria valued its Juul stake at just $250mn, a 98 per cent writedown on the valuation when it bought into the company in 2018.

Billy Gifford, Altria chief executive, said the move was the “appropriate path forward for our business”. In a second bid to crack the vaping market, Altria is working on a $2.75bn deal to buy e-cigarette company NJOY, which unlike Juul has received approval from the FDA for some of its products, according to two people familiar with the matter.

“Juul faces significant regulatory and legal challenges and uncertainties, many of which could exist for many years,” said Gifford. Despite the FDA ban, Juul’s products remain on shelves after a US appeals court placed a stay on the decision and the regulator launched an additional review.

Gifford said Altria was “continuing to explore all options for how we can best compete in the e-vapor category”. Last year, Altria ended its non-compete agreement with Juul and launched a joint venture with Japan Tobacco focused on heated tobacco products.

A person close to Altria acknowledged that the IP rights may never be developed into a fully fledged product, pointing out that the “technology . . . could or could not potentially become part of the company’s product pipeline”.

Juul did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Juul secured new funding from two existing investors last November but has been forced to cut jobs to preserve cash as it seeks to avert a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.

Juul executives have sounded out tobacco companies including Japan Tobacco and Philip Morris International in recent months about a possible investment, sale or licensing agreement, according to people briefed on the talks who said potential investors were still wary of the remaining legal and regulatory risks.

>>> US Close Dow -+1,17% S&P +1,61% Nasdaq *1,91%


Closing Stock Market Summary

The stock market closed out the week with a decent rally. The main indices moved higher right out of the gate, which had the S&P 500 open above its 50-day moving average (3,987). The positive disposition held up throughout the session and the main indices closed near their best levels of the day. The Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 rose 1.2%, 2.0%, and 1.6%, respectively. 

Price action in the Treasury market was an integral support factor for equities today. The 10-yr note yield settled back below 4.00%, down 11 basis points to 3.96%. The 2-yr note yield fell five basis points to 4.86%. The U.S. Dollar Index also fell 0.5% to 104.50. 

The drop in market rates fueled buying interest in growth stocks. The Russell 3000 Growth Index rose 1.9% versus a 1.4% gain in the Russell 3000 Value Index. 

There may have been some technical buying interest driving today's gains after the S&P 500 found support at its 200-day moving average (3,940) yesterday.

Broad based buying left all 11 S&P 500 sectors in positive territory. The consumer staples sector (+0.1%) registered the slimmest gain, weighed down by an earnings-driven loss in Costco (COST 475.26, -10.43, +2.2%). On the flip side, gains in mega cap components propelled the information technology (+2.1%), consumer discretionary (+2.1%), and communication services (+2.1%) to the top of the leaderboard. 

The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) rose 2.1% versus a 1.4% gain in the Invesco S&P 500. Tesla (TSLA 197.79, +6.89, +3.6%) was a standout after February sales data out of China suggested a 13% rise m/m to 74,402 vehicles, according to Bloomberg.

  • Nasdaq Composite: +11.7% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +9.5% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +9.0% YTD
  • S&P 500: +5.4% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +0.7% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:

  • February IHS Markit Services PMI - Final 50.6; Prior 50.5
  • February ISM Services PMI 55.1% (consensus 54.5%); Prior 55.2%
    • The key takeaway from the report is that activity remained steady in February despite expectations for a slower pace of growth. Prices continued growing, which gives the Fed another argument to continue its rate hike campaign.

Economic data on Monday is limited to the January Factory Orders (consensus -1.8%; prior 1.8%) at 10:00 a.m. ET.