WSJ : Bitcoin Loses a Highly Valued Asset—Anonymity

Bitcoin Loses a Highly Valued Asset—Anonymity
U.S. authorities are making arrests and seizing funds with the help of new tools to identify criminals through cryptocurrency transactions

James Zhong appeared to have pulled off the perfect crime.

In December 2012, he stumbled upon a software bug while withdrawing money from his account on Silk Road, an online marketplace used to hide criminal dealings behind the seemingly bulletproof anonymity of blockchain transactions and the dark web. Mr. Zhong, a 22-year-old University of Georgia computer-science student at the time, used the site to buy cocaine.

“I accidentally double-clicked the withdraw button and was shocked to discover that it resulted in allowing me to withdraw double the amount of bitcoin I had deposited,” he later said in federal court. After the first fraudulent withdrawal, Mr. Zhong created new accounts and with a few hours of work stole 50,000 bitcoins worth around $600,000, court papers from federal prosecutors show.

Federal officials closed Silk Road a year later on criminal grounds and seized computers that held its transaction records. The records didn’t reveal Mr. Zhong’s caper at first. Authorities hadn’t yet mastered how to track people and groups hidden behind blockchain wallet addresses, the series of letters and numbers used to anonymously send and receive cryptocurrency. One elemental feature of the system was the privacy it gave users.

Mr. Zhong moved the stolen bitcoins from one account to another for eight years to cover his tracks. By late 2021, the red-hot crypto market had raised the value of his trove to $3.4 billion. He still lived in a modest house in Athens, Ga., and dressed in shorts and T-shirts. He also had a lake-house getaway in Gainesville, Ga., a Lamborghini sports car and a $150,000 Tesla.

In November 2021, federal agents surprised Mr. Zhong with a search warrant and found the digital keys to his crypto fortune hidden in a basement floor safe and a popcorn tin in the bathroom. Mr. Zhong, who pleaded guilty to wire fraud, is scheduled to be sentenced Friday in New York federal court, where prosecutors are seeking a prison sentence of less than two years.

Mr. Zhong’s case is one of the highest-profile examples of how federal authorities have pierced the veil of blockchain transactions. Private and government investigators can now identify wallet addresses associated with terrorists, drug traffickers, money launderers and cybercriminals, all of which were supposed to be anonymous.

Law enforcement agencies, working with cryptocurrency exchanges and blockchain-analytics companies, have compiled data gleaned from earlier investigations, including the Silk Road case, to map the flow of cryptocurrency transactions across criminal networks worldwide. In the past two years, the U.S. has seized more than $10 billion worth of digital currency through successful prosecutions, according to the Internal Revenue Service—in essence, by following the money. Instead of subpoenas to banks or other financial institutions, investigators can look to the blockchain for an instant snapshot of the money trail.

Government investigators exploit a feature of bitcoin and many other digital currencies: Every transaction is stored forever in blockchain’s online ledger and open for anyone to see. Since Mr. Zhong’s heist, authorities and private firms have compiled the equivalent of a blockchain address book to aid the IRS, Federal Bureau of Investigation and state and local authorities investigating cybercrimes. The blockchain-analytics company Chainalysis Inc., based in New York, said it has mapped more than a billion wallet addresses, separating out legitimate and questionable holdings and identifying the exchanges where the cryptocurrency is converted to cash.

“If there’s one thing the blockchain does really well, it preserves evidence perfectly,” said Jonathan Levin, a pioneer cryptocurrency sleuth and one of the founders of Chainalysis.

When bitcoins are stolen, the criminal is now “like a guy that robbed a bank in the snow,” said Matthew Price, a former IRS investigator who now runs investigations for cryptocurrency exchange Binance Inc. The criminal’s name might be unknown, he said, but digital breadcrumbs, like footprints in the snow, remain for authorities to follow.

Federal investigators have used blockchain-tracing techniques to shut down a child pornography website, disrupt funding for terrorist organizations and, in the Justice Department’s largest-ever financial seizure, retrieved $3.6 billion from a New York couple charged with laundering the proceeds of the 2016 hack of cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex. With each case, more accounts are added to the government’s blockchain address book.

These advances make it difficult for criminals to convert their spoils to cash. After government officials publish wallet addresses connected to crooks, no legitimate cryptocurrency exchange wants to do business with them, fearing legal consequences.

Last year, a group that U.S. officials linked to North Korea stole about $720 million by hacking two cryptocurrency services—Harmony’s Horizon Bridge and Sky Mavis’s Ronin Network. In February, the FBI published a list of wallet addresses linked to the $100 million Horizon Bridge theft, effectively stonewalling hackers from withdrawing cash through legitimate exchanges.

Nick Carlsen, an analyst with crypto-security company TRM Labs, said North Korea, which has previously denied involvement in hacking attacks, “can steal huge amounts of crypto, but they seem to have exceeded the illicit crypto industry’s capacity to turn those funds into dollars.”

Bitcoin breakthrough
In a groundbreaking case, Mr. Levin and his business partner Michael Gonager were brought in to investigate the 2014 collapse of Mt. Gox, a cryptocurrency exchange that was once the world’s most popular online destination for buying and selling bitcoin.

They developed software to monitor cryptocurrency transactions, using state-of-the art research, their own data crunching and dogged detective work. “It was really the first time that it had been possible to create a whole entity view of something on the blockchain,” Mr. Levin said.

Working from a San Francisco Airbnb, it took three months for Mr. Levin, an economist, and Mr. Gonager, a computer scientist, to learn that Mt. Gox held fewer bitcoins in reserve than it believed. Today, Mr. Levin said, that kind of investigation would take 30 seconds. All told, thieves had stolen 600,000 bitcoins from the exchange.

The work prompted Messrs. Levin and Gonager to start Chainalysis, which now flags risky sources of funds for more than 200 clients, including the IRS, FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration, as well as banks and cryptocurrency exchanges. The company was recently hired by business partners and creditors of the failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX.

Blockchain analytics provide law enforcement investigators with an important piece of the blockchain puzzle—mapping the flow of cryptocurrency belonging to specific people and groups. Greater regulatory scrutiny of cryptocurrency exchanges has also helped. Exchanges have stepped up systems to identify the parties they do business with—under so-called know-your-customer requirements—and are more responsive to law-enforcement inquiries.

A host of blockchain-analytics companies, including Elliptic and CipherTrace, which is owned by MasterCard Inc., have sprung up. Many of them have hired federal investigators who spearheaded the government’s first cryptocurrency investigations.

Ransomware victims worldwide paid at least $457 million last year to bitcoin addresses controlled by criminals, according to Chainalysis. Ransomware refers to hackers locking up a computer network by encrypting hard drives and demanding money to reopen them. Blockchain-tracking techniques have made it possible for federal officials to recover more stolen funds, which has contributed to a slowdown in ransomware payments. The DOJ has seized about $40 million in ransom payments as of November, according to Eun Young Choi, the director of the DOJ’s national cryptocurrency enforcement team.

In January, about 150 people gathered at a Palo Alto, Calif., community center to learn more about the new investigative tools, including a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department detective, a prosecutor from New York’s Queens district attorney’s office and a police cybercrime investigator from Calgary, Alberta.

Conference organizer Erin West, a Santa Clara County, Calif., prosecutor, described how her county recovered more than $2 million in stolen funds last year from victims of an online scam known as “pig butchering.” The scheme involved offshore criminals befriending victims via text and persuading them to put money into phony crypto investments.

Chris Janczewski, a former IRS agent and now the head of global investigations at TRM Labs, told the story of his rise from auditing small-town tax cheats to his work helping break up a global child-pornography distributor. Like many pioneering blockchain investigators, Mr. Janczewski said he was largely self-taught.

“Chris is the real deal. He’s a detective’s detective that happened upon cryptocurrency at just the right time and figured out how to use the blockchain to identify horrific perpetrators of crimes worldwide,” Ms. West said. “He didn’t have any tools at that time. He just figured stuff out as any good detective would.”

Buying friends
Mr. Zhong told people he had been bullied growing up in Georgia. As a high-school junior, pranksters pulled down his pants while he was at a football game, according to court documents filed in his defense. “I always hated school,” he said in the documents. “At least upstairs in my house, I was myself being on a computer.”

Computers also provided a financial escape. Mr. Zhong was a cryptocurrency pioneer, who in 2009 was mining hundreds of bitcoins a day. They weren’t worth much at the time. But by the time he was in college, he converted some of his digital wealth into $700,000 in cash. He wanted to have a “case full of money like in the movies,” Mr. Zhong said, according to a psychological assessment filed with the court. “He hoped the visual appeal of the cash would impress a female into having sexual relations with him. He stated his plan did not work.”

For five years after the Silk Road theft, Mr. Zhong sat on his digital treasure. In 2017, he embarked on a $16 million spending spree, much of it spent trying to win friends, according to court papers and his lawyer, Michael Bachner. Mr. Zhong gave away 258 bitcoins, many of them on digital devices each loaded with 50 bitcoins and now worth close to $1.5 million. He hosted friends on chartered planes and boats, at sporting events and in fancy hotels, according to court papers and Clayton Kemker, a former bond salesman who became Mr. Zhong’s business partner.

Mr. Zhong made his big mistake on Dec. 16, 2020, according to court records and an analysis of his bitcoin transactions by Elliptic. He combined crypto funds the IRS had linked to the Silk Road thefts with legitimate funds he kept in a cryptocurrency exchange.

With Mr. Zhong’s Silk Road link in hand, authorities went to the bitcoin exchange that handled the transaction. The exchange gave IRS agents an IP address, 45.20.67.1, and Mr. Zhong’s internet service provider confirmed that he had been using that address since 2016. A month later, federal agents searched Mr. Zhong’s house and found the digital storage devices that helped clinch the investigation.

The government seized more than 50,000 bitcoins from Mr. Zhong, which at the time were worth $3.36 billion. A DOJ spokesman declined to comment on the case.

Messrs. Zhong and Kemker had planned a real-estate development that was to encompass 340 apartments, 60,000 feet of retail space and a rooftop bar in Memphis, Tenn. Mr. Zhong pledged $42 million for the project, which has since been abandoned, Mr. Kemker said.

The partnership with Mr. Zhong cost him his life savings, Mr. Kemker said. “He didn’t know how to navigate the business world. He just knew coding and tech.”

FT : UK cracks down on financial fixers for Russian oligarchs Abramovich and Usm

UK cracks down on financial fixers for Russian oligarchs Abramovich and Usmanov
Latest moves target those who ‘assisted sanctioned Russia oligarchs to hide their assets in complex financial networks’

The UK has cracked down on several financial fixers supporting Russian oligarchs such as Roman Abramovich and Alisher Usmanov, the government revealed in a statement.

The latest sanctions, unveiled on Wednesday, target “those who have knowingly assisted sanctioned Russia oligarchs to hide their assets in complex financial networks” and include Cypriots Demetris Ioannides and Christodoulos Vassiliades.

Ioannides was responsible for crafting offshore structures that Abramovich used to hide more than £760mn assets before he was sanctioned in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the statement said.

Vassiliades was “at the centre of a web” of trusts and offshore companies that linked Usmanov and Sutton Place Estate.

FT : Thoma Bravo lost out in race for coveted tech group amid antitrust fears

Thoma Bravo lost out in race for coveted tech group amid antitrust fears
Qualtrics eventually sold for $12.5bn to Silver Lake and CPP in largest leveraged buyout of year

Thoma Bravo, the acquisitions-hungry private equity group, lost out in the race to buy a highly prized technology company that was eventually sold for $12.5bn amid fears US authorities would stymie the deal on competition grounds.

Thoma Bravo had hoped to buy Qualtrics, a software group focused on customer service, and merge it with Medallia, a rival company that it already owns, according to three people briefed on the matter.

However, Qualtrics was eventually sold to Silver Lake and Canada’s largest pension fund, CPP, for $12.5bn last month in the biggest US leveraged buyout of the year. Silver Lake’s bid triumphed even though Thoma Bravo had considered making a higher offer, the people said.

The unsuccessful pursuit underscores the heightened scrutiny that buyout groups are facing from regulators in Washington since Joe Biden became president in 2020. The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have pledged to take a more aggressive stance towards private equity dealmaking.

“The regulatory environment is having an impact,” said Charles Rule, a lawyer at Rule Garza Howley who specialises in antitrust matters. “In the last two or three years the uncertainty over antitrust has led to certain deals not going forward that would have otherwise moved forward.”

Private equity groups started circling Qualtrics in January after its biggest shareholder, German technology conglomerate SAP, said it was looking to sell its stake in the Nasdaq-listed company, worth about $7bn at the time.

SAP’s announcement effectively put the entire company in play as a “take-private” target, generating a flurry of interest from buyout groups. Silver Lake and Thoma Bravo emerged as the frontrunners, the people said.

Thoma Bravo was able to offer slightly more than Silver Lake and CPP because merging Qualtrics with Medallia would have allowed it to make significant cost savings, the people added.

But Qualtrics ended up accepting the Silver Lake offer amid fears that regulators might scrutinise the deal during a lengthy review.

“It is a giant loser if a deal gets hung up on a review,” said one private equity executive.

The Qualtrics deal offers a rare glimpse into the chilling effect that regulators in the Biden administration are having on dealmaking by using the bully pulpit to torpedo putative takeovers before a formal offer is made.

“There is no success greater for us than deterrence,” Jonathan Kanter, head of the DoJ’s antitrust unit, told a conference last month. He said that one way of deterring deals was to commence a formal review, “but I can tell you, there are many more non-public abandonments”.

In an interview with the Financial Times last year, Kanter warned that the DoJ would crack down on private equity groups rolling up swaths of the American economy.

Earlier this year, the DoJ issued a so-called second request review on Thoma Bravo’s planned takeover of cyber security company ForgeRock. The review requires the firm, which manages more than $120bn in assets, to share information with the regulator by May.

Other private equity groups considered bidding for Qualtrics, said two sources briefed on the matter, including Hellman & Friedman and Permira. The pair already own Genesys and Zendesk, which operate in a similar space.

Thoma Bravo, Hellman Friedman, Permira and Silver Lake declined to comment. Qualtrics did not respond to a request for comment.

WWD : Palm Angels Collaborates With Barbour

Palm Angels Collaborates With Barbour
Palm Angels and Barbour teamed to debut three brightly hued takes on Barbour's classic Bedale wax jacket.
This spring, buzzy Milan-based brand Palm Angels has collaborated with heritage label Barbour for the first time to debut a collaborative, brightly hued take on the Barbour Bedale wax jacket.

“Curation defines Palm Angels creative approach: different things that magically come together by the simple fact of being one next to the other. As for Palm Angels and Barbour whose Bedale wax jacket has been uniquely reedited with unreleased new colors to create exactly that magic,” Francesco Ragazzi, Palm Angels’ founder and creative director, told WWD.
A look from Palm Angels x Barbour.
COURTESY OF PALM ANGELS.

The lightweight, unisex jacket — originally designed in the ‘80s — boasts a screen-printed, slightly distressed Palm Angels logo on the back and is available in three exclusive colorways of hot pink, scarlet ibis and vibrant yellow with coordinating 8 wale cord trim, 2 oz. nylon drip strip, high density cotton lining, gold studs, corduroy edged pockets and collar and special-edition tartan detailing. The collaborative wax jacket’s vivid colorways were said to take inspiration from high visibility vests and coats and are available for $599 through the brands and with select retail partners.

Business Of Fashion : Swiss Watch CEOs From Patek to Oris See Slowdown After Boo

Swiss Watch CEOs From Patek to Oris See Slowdown After Boom

The heads of some of the biggest Swiss watch brands, from Patek Philippe to Oris, said demand for luxury timepieces is starting to slow from an unprecedented industry boom during the pandemic.

“I see in the past two months, the market is a little bit slower than before,” said Thierry Stern, the chairman and controlling shareholder of Patek Philippe SA, the family-owned Geneva-based brand.

“I don’t say that it’s very bad — not at all. But I just see that it’s slowing down,” he added in an interview.

Oris, the independent brand, said although its revenues are up by double-digit percentage points so far this year it too is seeing some early signs of softness from retailer orders.

“The sell out has been continuously good but then stocking has been a little bit softer,” co-chief executive officer Rolf Studer said in an interview.

The comments mark an early indication that the luxury watch sector may be cooling after demand and Swiss exports surged to record levels close to 25 billion Swiss francs ($27.6 billion) during the pandemic as a new generation of consumers, particularly in the US, rediscovered mechanical timepieces.

Demand for Patek’s timepieces, which start at around $30,000, still far outstrips supply. But the company’s president said anticipation of new models or ongoing concerns about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and economic uncertainty could be damping consumer appetites.

Oris, whose average watch price is up from 2,200 francs to 2,400, said the US market was still strong as was France but European countries including Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands were more challenging.

“You see that people are a little more cautious,” he said.

Julien Tornare, the head of the Zenith watch brand, warned that there is “quite a bit of instability everywhere” despite ending 2022 with the best-ever sales performance since being acquired by luxury juggernaut LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE in 1999.

Tornare pointed to the “trauma” of the three-year pandemic shutdown of the China retail market, which was the top destination for Swiss watch exports before being surpassed by the US in 2021.

“I think we need to be a bit patient to get back to what we knew before,” Tornare said of Chinese buyers who have yet to fully return to pre-pandemic spending habits since the end of Covid-Zero policies there.

Cooling demand would be a mixed blessing for Patek and other top watch brands like Rolex SA as it might reduce the time that customers must spend on waitlists before getting the call from authorised dealers.

The gap between Patek’s production of about 70,000 watches per year and demand is so big that “it’s not so bad if we see a certain slowdown,” Stern said.

TechCrunch : Elon Musk admits he only bought Twitter because he thought he’d be

Elon Musk admits he only bought Twitter because he thought he’d be forced to

Elon Musk gave a rare interview to an actual reporter late on Tuesday, speaking to BBC reporter James Clayton on a Twitter Spaces. During the interview, Clayton pressed Musk on whether his purchase of Twitter was, in the end, something he went through with willingly, or whether it was something he did because the active court case at the time in which Twitter was trying to force him to go through with the sale was going badly.

The answer (which we all suspected anyway) was that Musk did indeed only do the deal because he believed legally, he was going to be forced to do so anyway. Here’s the relevant transcript from the Twitter Spaces audio:

Clayton: So then you change your mind again, and decided to buy it – did you do that? Did you do that?

Musk: Well, I kind of had to.

Clayton: Right. Did you do that, because you thought that a court would make you do that?

Musk: Yes.

Clayton: Right.


Musk: Yes, that is the reason.

Clayton: So you were still trying to get out of it. And then you just were advised by lawyers, “Look, you’re going to buy this?”

Musk: Yes.

In case you don’t recall (it was all the way back in September/October last year which is basically an eternity ago in current Twitter time), Twitter took Musk to trial to force him to honor his signed obligation to acquire the company for the agreed-upon price of $44 billion, or $54.20 per share. Musk was contending that his obligation was void because Twitter had, he claimed, inflated its real user numbers and understated the number of bots on the platform.

Musk then notified the SEC that he intended to buy the company after all at the price he originally set with the company, a move most agreed at the time was made because his legal case was weak and the trial was clearly not going his way.

FT : An annus horribilis for UK stockpickers

An annus horribilis for UK stockpickers
Active UK managers and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad year

By now it’s widely known that most active managers underperform almost every year, and over the long run the vast majority of them do so. But even by that grim yardstick, UK stockpickers had an absolute shocker in 2022.

FT Alphaville wrote about S&P Dow Jones’s annual “SPIVA” scorecard for US fund managers last month, and today the index provider released its European version.

The results were… not great:

It was a challenging year for active managers in European equities, with the Pan-European Equity category recording its highest annual underperformance rate since the SPIVA Europe Scorecard’s inception in 2014. Fixed income managers had a better year in relative terms, with the majority outperforming in 5 of 11 categories over the one-year horizon. Across both asset classes, however, underperformance rates increased to a similarly high average over a 10-year horizon.

However, the real shocker was the performance of active UK equity funds. A massive 92 per cent of large-cap funds and 97 per cent of mid-cap funds underperformed their benchmarks in 2022. That is the worst annual results on record, S&P noted.

Things were a bit better for UK small-caps fund managers, but only relative to the ’mare that their bigger cousins suffered: About 67 per cent of UK funds specialising in smaller stocks underperformed in 2022.

S&P noted that the dispersion between top and bottom performers was unusually large in Europe and in the UK in particular, given all the volatility. “Certainly, there was a high potential for outperformance in European markets last year. Unfortunately, in many categories, there was also considerable potential for material underperformance,” it deadpans.

The index provider suggests that the unusually bad performance of European fund managers versus US ones in 2022 might boil down to currency shenanigans.

In addition to generating greater volatility, rate hikes in the U.S. strengthened the U.S. dollar, which would have been relatively detrimental to European managers investing in the U.S. who chose to hedge their exposure to the U.S. dollar . . . The S&P 500 EUR and S&P 500 GBP outperformed their currency hedged counterparts by 7.8% and 12.2%, respectively, and with lower volatility.

This may help explain why euro- and pound sterling-denominated U.S. Equity managers displayed a considerably higher underperformance rate than their counterparts across the Atlantic: 67% of European-based U.S. large-cap funds underperformed the S&P 500 (in either reported currency), while our U.S. Scorecard reported that only 51% of U.S.-based large-cap funds did similarly.

However, does this fully explain why UK managers performed spectacularly worse than European ones? Further suggestions in the box below.

TechCrunch : Strava launches integration with Spotify to let users listen to con

Strava launches integration with Spotify to let users listen to content while tracking activities

Strava, the activity tracking and social community platform used by more than 100 million people globally, has announced a new in-app integration with Spotify. The integration allows users to easily access music, podcasts and audiobooks from the Strava app while tracking activities.

Starting today, users can play, pause, resume, skip and browse Spotify content from the record screen on Strava. With this new integration, users will no longer have to switch between the two apps when adjusting the content that they’re listening to.

“We’re excited to partner with a global leader like Spotify to seamlessly integrate music and movement on the platform,” said Mateo Ortega, Strava’s Vice President of Connected Partnerships, in an emailed statement. “This new feature further solidifies Strava’s position at the center of connected fitness and continues to demonstrate the power of the global community of active people on Strava.”

In a statement, Spotify VP of Business Development said one of the streaming service’s biggest goals is to be everywhere where listeners are, and that this integration with Strava is one of the ways it’s allowing listeners to seamless content to the music and audio on its platform.

Spotify isn’t the only popular app that Strava has recently launched an integration with. A few months ago, the company partnered with Snap to launch a new Lens that lets users share their fitness journey on Snapchat. The Strava Activity Lens works by connecting directly to your Strava profile, giving you access to stats and activity maps from your recent workouts.

Founded in 2009, Strava has made a name for itself as one of the leading activity tracking services. It’s also a social network for fitness enthusiasts, as you can share your races and workouts with friends and followers on your Strava feed. You can also post photos, build communities and leave kudos and comments on others’ activities.

Today’s announcement comes as Strava recently acquired Fatmap, a European company that’s building a high-resolution 3D global map platform for the great outdoors. The ultimate long-term goal for Strava is to integrate Fatmap’s core platform into Strava itself.