Barrons : Graphite Is China’s New Trade Weapon. Who Should Take Cover.

Graphite Is China’s New Trade Weapon. Who Should Take Cover.

China just pulled out some heavy artillery in the global tech cold war, though it hasn’t fired just yet.

If you thought lithium was the biggest component in a lithium-ion electric vehicle battery, you’d be wrong. That distinction goes to graphite. This humble element, better known to many from No. 2 pencils, is the basis of the anode, or negative pole, of EV batteries, accounting for up to half their weight. More than 90% of anode-ready graphite is produced in China.

Beijing called attention to this fact on Oct. 20, a few days after the U.S. ratcheted up controls on semiconductor exports to China. Graphite sales from China will require a license as of Dec. 1.

Xi Jinping’s government slapped similar restrictions this summer on two rare earth metals common in electronics manufacturing, gallium and germanium. Gallium prices have jumped by half since then, data provider Argus reports. A graphite squeeze could have a stronger impact still, says Ross Gregory, a partner at Korea-based consultant New Electric Partners. “Rare earths was a flesh wound,” he says. “Graphite would cause some internal bleeding.”

Graphite can either be mined or derived synthetically from petrochemicals. Synthetic production is more common and theoretically easier to replicate. But the pollution and carbon footprint involved can negate the underlying purpose of going green. “You’ll never see China’s huge blast furnaces in Western countries because of the environmental impact,” says Tom Kavanagh, the editor of Argus Battery Materials.

Graphite reserves are spread more evenly around the globe, with Brazil and Turkey among the leaders. China accounts for 80% of mine production, however. Virtually all the rest heads to China for processing. Competing projects are in the pilot stage. Australian-listed Syrah Resources (ticker: SYR.Australia), controls a large mining complex in Mozambique and is building a processing plant in Louisiana. (Its shares jumped 40% on China’s announcement.)

Vianode, a Norwegian outfit part-owned by Norsk Hydro (NHY.Norway) promises to make synthetic graphite while cutting CO2 content by 90%. That’s likely to cost a lot more than the Chinese model, Kavanagh predicts.

Graphite prices have actually fallen lately as China ramped up synthetic production while its economic troubles dampened domestic EV demand, says Kien Huynh, chief commercial officer at Alkemy Capital Investments, which focuses on energy transition metals. “My response to this news is the Chinese are trying to return some pricing power,” he says.

China needs to consider that past trade weaponizations have produced a response, eventually, says Marko Papic, chief strategist at the Clocktower Group. Beijing curtailed rare earth exports to Japan over a territorial dispute for a few months in 2010. Since then, its share of rare earths production has slumped from 90% to 70% as customers devised alternatives.

An all-out graphite squeeze would also affect a range of basic industries that use the element, with blowback for China’s already struggling economy. Instead, Beijing will look to “pick and choose who wins and loses” from access to its graphite, Papic thinks.

No prize for guessing who the intended losers could be. “This could severely affect U.S. auto makers as they shift from internal combustion to EVs” Gregory says.

That’s a less-than-ideal backdrop for Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi, who arrived Thursday in Washington.

“Neither side is interested in fundamentally changing their own behavior for a ‘tech peace,’” says Scott Kennedy, senior advisor in Chinese economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Barrons : Frontier’s Largest Investor Keeps Buying Up Stock

Frontier’s Largest Investor Keeps Buying Up Stock

Frontier Communications
FYBR

-4.81%
stock has lost about a third of its value so far this year, but the communications company’s largest investor continues to buy up shares.

Frontier stock (ticker: FYBR) is off its lows so far in 2023, but it has struggled to build upward momentum. Frontier emerged from bankruptcy in 2021, focused on converting its legacy telecom network to modern fiberoptics. But the stock essentially traded sideways until this year, when a decisive slide set in. With shares in the red, Barron’s recommended buying Frontier stock in July. This script changed earlier this month, when activist investor Jana Partners disclosed that it had invested in Frontier, and planned to push for the sale of the company.

Ares Management
ARES

-0.74%
has been a steady buyer of Frontier stock since March. So far this year, It has paid more than $75 million for 3.7 million shares, an average price of $20.31 each. Ares’ latest purchase was on Oct. 18, when it paid $2.8 million for 150,000 shares, an average price of $18.93 each. According to a form it filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Ares now owns 38.9 million Frontier shares. It remains Frontier’s largest shareholder with a stake of nearly 16%, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Ares didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

In response to Jana’s investment, Frontier has said that its board and management “are focused on driving long-term value for our shareholders, employees, and customers and continue to take actions that enable us to deliver on this objective.”

>>> US Close Dow -1,12% S&P -0,48% Nasdaq +0,38% Russell -1,21%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The major indices all closed near session lows. Negative price action had the S&P 500 (-0.5%) test the 4,100 level, hitting 4,103 at its low. Today's close marks a 10.3% decline in the S&P 500 from the July 31 high (i.e. a technical correction). Meanwhile, a big gain in Amazon.com (AMZN 127.74, +8.17, +6.8%) following better-than-expected earnings and guidance helped support the Nasdaq Composite, which closed with a 0.4% gain.

Other mega caps outperformed alongside Amazon, as evidenced by a 0.5% gain in the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Semiconductor stocks were another pocket of strength after Intel (INTC 35.54, +3.02, +9.3%) beat earnings estimates. The PHLX Semiconductor Index climbed 1.2%.

Just about everything else aside from mega caps and semiconductor stocks declined today. Eight of the 11 S&P 500 sectors decline with six of them registering losses larger than 1.0%. The energy sector (-2.3%) was the worst performer by a wide margin thanks to losses in Chevron (CVX 144.35, -10.40, -6.7%) and Exxon Mobil (XOM 105.55, -2.05, -1.9%) after they reported earnings.

The financials sector (-1.9%) was the next worst performer, weighed down by a loss in JPMorgan Chase (JPM 135.69, -5.07, -3.6%) after CEO Jamie Dimon confirmed that he and his family plan to sell a portion of their holdings.

The only sectors to close in the green -- consumer discretionary (+1.7%), information technology (+0.6%), and communication services (+0.1%) -- house the outperforming mega cap stocks.

The negative bias was partially driven by geopolitical angst after reports that the US carried out airstrikes against Iranian backed targets in Syria, and separate reports that Israel is expanding ground operations in Gaza.

Participants learned about those developments ahead of the weekend when market's are closed for trading and investors can't react in real-time.

Market participants were also reacting to this morning's release of the September Personal Income and Spending report, which featured inflation numbers that are not likely to persuade the Fed to cut rates anytime soon.

The 2-yr note yield fell two basis points to 5.03% and the 10-yr note yield settled unchanged at 4.85%.
  • Nasdaq Composite: +20.8% YTD
  • S&P 500: +7.4% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: -2.2% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: -4.3% YTD
  • Russell 2000: -7.1% YTD
Reviewing today's economic data:
  • September Personal Income 0.3% vs consensus of 0.4%; Prior 0.4%; September Personal Spending 0.7% ( consensus 0.5%); Prior 0.4%; September PCE Prices 0.4% ( consensus 0.3%); Prior 0.4%; September PCE Prices - Core 0.3% (consensus 0.3%); Prior 0.1%
    • The key takeaway from the report is that the PCE Price Index and the core PCE Price Index had a sticky feel to them, meaning they lacked a stronger trend of disinflation. That is apt to keep the Fed in a more hawkish mindset, which doesn't mean the Fed will be moved to raise rates soon. What it does mean is that the Fed won't be thinking about a rate cut anytime soon.
  • October Univ. of Michigan Consumer Sentiment - Final 63.8 (consensus 63.1); Prior 63.0
    • The key takeaway from the report is that the decline relative to the final September reading was owed to weakening sentiment among higher-income consumers and those with sizable stock holdings. Furthermore, expected business conditions weakened among all consumers and year-ahead inflation expectations jumped back to a level last seen in May.

There is no U.S. economic data of note of Monday.

WSJ : Google Commits $2 Billion in Funding to AI Startup Anthropic

Google Commits $2 Billion in Funding to AI Startup Anthropic
Google move follows Amazon investment as tech giants place bigger bets on startups racing to develop artificial intelligence

Google agreed to invest up to $2 billion in Anthropic, building on its earlier investment in the artificial-intelligence company and adding fuel to the race between startups trying to achieve the next big breakthrough in the emerging technology.

Google invested $500 million upfront into the OpenAI rival and agreed to add $1.5 billion more over time, people familiar with the matter said. The investment follows a separate commitment Amazon AMZN 6.83%increase; green up pointing triangle made last month to invest $4 billion in the company, which was founded by former OpenAI engineers in 2021 with the goal of developing rival generative AI models.

Google, owned by parent company Alphabet GOOG -0.03%decrease; red down pointing triangle, already invested $550 million in Anthropic earlier this year.

Google’s new deal, which hasn’t previously been reported, is the latest one that technology giants have struck with artificial intelligence businesses, which need billions of dollars to train more advanced versions of their AI systems. It reflects the excitement among tech giants to align themselves with promising startups trying to seize upon the overnight success of ChatGPT and develop their own AI-powered audio, text and image technology.

In January, Microsoft signed a landmark $10 billion investment in OpenAI, the maker of the breakout ChatGPT bot, adding to the $3 billion it had already invested and giving it a 49% stake in the company. The startup, led by Chief Executive Sam Altman, has committed to using Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform to train its AI models.

The three major providers of on-demand computing—Amazon, Google and Microsoft—have increasingly allied themselves with either Anthropic or OpenAI, the two startups with the grandest ambitions for future artificial intelligence models.

Anthropic’s founders, led by the siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei, left OpenAI two years ago after a dispute with Altman over how to safely develop artificial intelligence.

Since then, Anthropic has been in an intensifying battle with OpenAI to secure the training resources and deep-pocketed backers needed to become the technology’s leaders. Anthropic offers an AI assistant called Claude that competes with ChatGPT, as well as a similar tool it sells to businesses.

Anthropic’s two megadeals with Amazon and Google mean it has raised almost $7 billion in the past year alone. Anthropic has also struck large deals with Amazon and Google to train and run its models.

The AI company was largely bankrolled by Sam Bankman Fried’s FTX until the crypto exchange collapsed last year, pushing Anthropic to find other backers. It turned to the cloud giants as well as more traditional Silicon Valley investors like Spark Capital and Menlo Ventures. Earlier this year, it achieved a valuation of $4 billion.

Anthropic has told investors that the leaders of the AI race could be cemented as soon as next year and has painted a rosy picture of the future where AI tools could lead to virtual assistants, more intelligent search engines and more advanced content generation for things like movie scripts and videogames.

Google has bet big on AI as it tries to catch up to Amazon and Microsoft in the lucrative cloud-computing market, hoping the new software will encourage corporate customers to increase spending.

Shares in parent company Alphabet have fallen more than 10% since it announced lower-than-expected sales growth in Google Cloud during third-quarter earnings on Tuesday, dampening enthusiasm for the unit’s AI push. Google executives said during an analyst call that some customers had recently reduced spending, and the company would continue investing aggressively in cloud.

Besides Anthropic, Google has invested in the AI startups Runway, a maker of video production tools, and Hugging Face, an open-source software service. Google has also spent billions developing its own sophisticated AI systems, including an unreleased algorithm called Gemini that it hopes will compete directly with the technology powering ChatGPT.

WSJ : Abercrombie Sued Over Former CEO’s Alleged Abuse of Male Models

Abercrombie Sued Over Former CEO’s Alleged Abuse of Male Models
Lawsuit claims Mike Jeffries ran trafficking operation and coerced men into sex; retailer has said it is investigating the allegations

Abercrombie & Fitch ANF 0.07%increase; green up pointing triangle was accused in a lawsuit of enabling former chief Mike Jeffries to run an alleged sex-trafficking operation for years.

Jeffries ran Abercrombie from 1992 until 2014 and built the brand into a global fashion giant around sexualized marketing. The CEO allegedly used promises of a job at Abercrombie to lure young men to locations around the world and coerced them to have sex with him and others, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in Manhattan federal court.

The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status, follows a recent BBC investigation where several men made similar claims against Jeffries.

A spokeswoman for Abercrombie declined to comment on the lawsuit, which seeks unspecified financial damages. Abercrombie said earlier this month that it had engaged an outside law firm to conduct an independent investigation into the allegations and that the company was “appalled and disgusted” by them.

The lawsuit was brought by David Bradberry, who alleged that Jeffries victimized men with the help of a network of co-conspirators that included Abercrombie. The suit estimated that “dozens and likely over a hundred young models” were victims.

Bradberry’s lawyers also represented Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers who sued JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank earlier this year. Both banks, which were accused of facilitating Epstein’s sex trafficking, reached settlements totaling around $365 million without admitting wrongdoing.

“Abercrombie profited enormously from the oversexualized exploitation of young men,” said Brad Edwards, a lawyer for Bradberry and other potential class members, adding that the company had a “willingness to enable a sexually abusive and exploitative environment to drive profits.”

The suit against Abercrombie also named the 79-year-old Jeffries, the former CEO’s family office, and Jeffries’ partner Matthew Smith as co-defendants. The lawsuit said Jeffries relied on Abercrombie resources to carry out the scheme, and the company allowed him to pay “hush money” to victims using company funds. It also said Jeffries’ partner had deep and unusual connections to the company, with Smith attending private board meetings, having access to internal documents and making about 170 visits to stores over a more than two-year period.

“Mr. Jeffries will not comment in the press on this new lawsuit as he has likewise chosen not to regarding lawsuits in the past. The courtroom is where we will deal with this matter,” said Brian Bieber, a lawyer for Jeffries. Smith didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Executives at the company, which has about 760 stores across brands including Hollister, have worked for several years to reinvent the namesake Abercrombie brand since Jeffries’ departure. Since 2017, the CEO has been Fran Horowitz, who joined the company in 2014.

Jeffries took the helm in 1992, when Abercrombie & Fitch was part of Leslie Wexner’s retail empire, which included Victoria’s Secret. Wexner hired the retail veteran to revamp what was then a money-losing brand that he had purchased in 1988.

Under Jeffries’ leadership, Abercrombie created a “Look Book” of rules for stores and hired college students to staff them. The company used sexually themed ads and shirtless male greeters to create a cult following with teens, who clamored for its logo-emblazoned T-shirts and sweatshirts. Jeffries stepped down in December 2014 following a string of poor results.

The BBC recently published an investigation that found a highly organized network employed middlemen to track down young men for sex events around the world with Jeffries and Smith. Some of those young men, including Bradberry, accused Jeffries and other men of sexual assault, according to the BBC’s reporting.

Bradberry said in the lawsuit he was approached in 2010 by a man who presented himself as an agent allegedly for young stars. The agent arranged a meeting with a modeling scout who told him that unless he allowed the scout to perform oral sex on him, he wouldn’t get a meeting with Jeffries. After the sex act, the scout allegedly gave Bradberry cash. Bradberry later was invited to casting events where he was sexually assaulted by Jeffries and others, the lawsuit claims.

Ahead of a casting event around May 2010, Bradberry allegedly was provided with Abercrombie gift cards where he was instructed to pick up clothes for himself. He also alleged he received prepaid travel instructions and was told to sign a nondisclosure agreement.

At Jeffries’ home in the Hamptons, the lawsuit said, Jeffries and Smith undressed in a room where other men were having sex, and Jeffries forced Bradberry to take a drug that made him lightheaded. Bradberry alleged that he was raped by Jeffries and forced to have sex with other men, while security guards in Abercrombie attire observed the activity.

Bradberry received $2,500 in cash and was then taken to other casting events in locations including Nice, France, and London—events that he thought would lead to a contract from Abercrombie, according to the suit. Instead, he said he was assaulted again. Bradberry wasn’t hired to work for Abercrombie, his lawyer said.

The lawsuit comes after the company has paid other settlements stemming from Jeffries’ tenure. In 2004, Abercrombie agreed to pay $40 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that said it had discriminated against Black, Hispanic and Asian employees related to a specific look that Jeffries preferred for store workers. The company agreed to implement programs and initiatives aimed at achieving greater diversity throughout its stores. It didn’t admit guilt in the settlement.

In 2012, Abercrombie settled an age-discrimination suit brought by a former jet pilot in 2010. Documents from the suit revealed that Jeffries and Smith established aircraft standards, including a dress code calling for boxer briefs for men, jeans being worn at the hips and an Abercrombie cologne.

FT : Big Oil bets big on extended life for fossil fuels

Big Oil bets big on extended life for fossil fuels

Has Big Oil in the US got its swagger back?

It’s tempting to believe so, in a week where the most significant industry consolidation in two decades gathered pace and the supermajors continued to enjoy a lift from rising crude prices.

As we report today, ExxonMobil, which fired the starting gun on the current M&A race with its $60bn purchase of Pioneer two weeks ago, is still on the hunt for deals, or at least those where “one plus one equals three”.

Exxon also reported third-quarter earnings had risen to $9.1bn, up from $7.9bn in the previous three months, thanks to the oil price increase and more refining activity, although a little lower than expected because of weaker margins in its chemical business and reduced trading.

On Monday, Chevron announced a $53bn deal to buy fellow US producer Hess, the biggest transaction in its history, doubling down on its bet that demand for fossil fuels would remain strong for decades to come. Today it reported third-quarter revenues of $6.5bn, down from $11.2bn last year, but up from $6bn in the previous three months.

This doubling down was attacked by former US vice-president and climate campaigner Al Gore this week in an FT interview as he hit out at the “buddy-buddy” relationship between political leaders and the fossil fuel industry, which he said was damaging prospects for global climate action.

Gore has also criticised the industry’s “capture” of the UN climate change negotiations. Big Oil remains unapologetic: “We are not selling a product that is evil,” Chevron chief Mike Wirth told the FT this week as he laid out a “real world” case for fossil fuels.

The backdrop to the industry manoeuvring is the shift from fossil fuels to cleaner sources of energy.

The International Energy Agency said this week that demand for oil would fall by almost half by 2050 if governments carried through on their green pledges and said that the energy crisis triggered by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, rising tensions in the Middle East and record temperatures highlighted the risk of continuing to rely on fossil fuels. The IEA also laid out the ramifications of governments failing to follow through on their pledges, showing oil demand would barely fall by 2050.

The FT editorial board said recent tie ups are part of the race to be last man standing, a bet that the IEA is wrong, and proof that, as Saudi Arabia’s energy minister said this week, “hydrocarbons are here to stay”. 

What the recent megadeals really show however is that we are in a new age of uncertainty, writes energy editor David Sheppard, who says that those betting the transactions signal robust demand growth may want to think twice.

“You can of course believe that the IEA have got this wildly wrong,” he says, “or that governments will grow tired of addressing climate change, if their populations deem it too complicated or expensive. But within the wide ranges and uncertainty of the IEA scenarios is a glimpse into what the likely path is for the oil sector. Investors should be careful about swaggering blindly towards it.”

FT : ExxonMobil seeks more M&A opportunities after $60bn Pioneer deal

ExxonMobil seeks more M&A opportunities after $60bn Pioneer deal
Quarterly profits at oil group and rival Chevron miss Wall Street expectations

ExxonMobil remains on the hunt for deals even after unveiling its biggest transaction this century, the company said on Friday, as it and rival Chevron reported profits that fell short of Wall Street expectations.

The largest US oil company announced this month it was buying Pioneer Natural Resources in a $60bn acquisition that fired the starting gun on what is expected to be a race to consolidate the sector.

Kathy Mikells, Exxon’s chief financial officer, said the deal did not preclude the supermajor from striking again in the near term.

“It’s important to say that we’re always looking,” she told the Financial Times. “Many times I’ve described us as very inquisitive but also very picky. A deal has got to be what we say is ‘one plus one equals three’.”

Chevron announced its own mega-deal this week: a $53bn takeover of Hess that accelerates the pace of M&A activity in the sector. Pierre Breber, the company’s finance chief, declined to say whether more could follow.

“We’re focused on this transaction,” Breber said in an interview. “It’s a big transaction . . . we’ll focus on executing this one well.”

Exxon reported earnings of $9.1bn, down sharply from $19.7bn last year on the back of lower crude prices, but also shy of the $9.6bn anticipated by analysts, according to LSEG.

Chevron’s earnings for the period of $6.5bn were down from $11.2bn a year ago and short of the $6.9bn pencilled in by analysts, according to LSEG. Surging oil prices last year pushed producers to record profits.

Exxon’s shares were steady in pre-market trading, while Chevron’s dropped 2 per cent.

Analysts and dealmakers expect more multibillion-dollar transactions as big producers aim to stock up on prime drilling spots that they can exploit into the coming decades despite warnings that fossil fuel demand could peak by 2030.

“It’s important to understand that we’re in a depletion business with upstream,” said Mikells. “I think [the deal] puts us in a good position for the long term.”

Pioneer is the biggest operator in the Permian Basin, the engine room of the US oil industry, which sprawls across Texas and New Mexico. By snapping up the company, Exxon will hold a dominant position in the oilfield, with 15 per cent of total crude production.

The deal was Exxon’s second significant transaction of the year after it bought Denbury Resources for $5bn in July to bolster its carbon management business. Denbury owns the biggest pipeline network in the US for transporting and storing CO₂.

In a statement on Friday, Exxon’s chief executive Darren Woods said: “Pioneer will help us grow supply to meet the world’s energy needs with lower carbon intensity while Denbury improves our competitive position to economically reduce emissions in hard-to-decarbonise industries.”

Chevron also announced a deal to snap up oil producer PDC Energy for $6.3bn in May, a transaction it closed this quarter. Its purchase of Hess will give it access to the biggest oil discovery in a decade off the coast of Guyana, where it will be working alongside Exxon, which operates the project known as the Stabroek block.

Both companies have increased capital expenditures this year as they pursue production growth. Exxon spent $18.6bn in the first nine months versus $15.2bn in 2022. Chevron’s outlay over the period rose to $11.5bn from $8.1bn last year.

Chevron’s chief Mike Wirth said the company was “investing to profitably grow our traditional and new energy businesses to drive superior value for shareholders”.