WSJ : Europe’s EV Troubles Run Deeper Than China

Europe’s EV Troubles Run Deeper Than China
European auto industry is starting to resemble a deer in the headlights—of a Chinese electric vehicle. Tariffs may not be enough to solve problem.

China is speeding ahead in the electric-vehicle race. Europe’s antisubsidy investigation into Chinese EV makers reflects this new reality, but tariffs alone aren’t enough to keep Europe’s automakers in the fast lane.

The European Union has launched a probe into whether state subsidies have given Chinese EV makers an unfair leg up as they accelerate into European markets. That shouldn’t be surprising given the importance of the auto industry to Europe—and how rapidly Chinese rivals have emerged as global leaders over the past couple of years. It also fits with the broad trend of rising protectionism globally, particularly for high-tech sectors such as EVs and batteries.

Imports from China account for around 15% of battery EVs sales in Europe, according to Bernstein. But not all of those come from Chinese automakers: Tesla, shipping from its Shanghai factory, made up 30% of those Chinese exports, says the brokerage firm. Even European carmakers such as BMW and Mercedes have been selling their made-in-China EVs to their home continent.

Subsidies have indeed played a big part in the rise of China’s EV industry. China has grown to become the world’s largest EV market after years of providing financial support and favorable policies for carmakers and battery manufacturers. But some of that largess is now draining away. For example, the government used to pay generous subsidies for EV buyers, but that program expired this year. EV buyers still enjoy tax breaks, however.

And like many other industries in China, local governments still subsidize manufacturers. For example, Chinese EV champion BYD booked around 14.7 billion yuan of government grants, equivalent to $2 billion, in 2022. That’s equal to around 3.5% of its revenue last year. Most of those grants were asset-related, probably meaning things like subsidies for building plants. But such subsidies, amortized as income over several years, add up to only around 0.4% of 2022 revenue—or about 10% of net income.

Subsidies, and other policies, certainly helped to kick-start China’s EV industry. But its EV makers have now become globally competitive, especially since the growing Chinese market gives them a big advantage in scale. Around one in three cars sold in China are either battery EVs or plug-in hybrid—and all of the top-selling models are Chinese brands, apart from Tesla. China’s large cluster of suppliers, including battery manufacturers, have helped lower costs. Only 7% of the content for BYD’s Seal sedan came from non-Chinese suppliers, according to UBS.

Higher tariffs are one potential outcome of the investigation, although not foreordained. China-made EVs still generally sell for much more in Europe than they do back home.

But the threat of tariffs could still push Chinese EV makers to switch some domestic production to Europe. UBS estimates that switching production to Eastern Europe would mean 3% higher production costs for Chinese EV makers, on average, than shipping them from China with the existing 10% tariff.

Trade barriers can brake China’s EV ambitions in Europe—at least a little. Ultimately though, European automakers will need to accelerate themselves, rather than hoping the government can solve the problem by adding a bit of extra drag to the competition.

FT : Abcam founder to vote against proposed $5.7bn acquisition by US Danaher

Abcam founder to vote against proposed $5.7bn acquisition by US Danaher
Jonathan Milner says deal materially undervalues Cambridge-based life sciences company

The founder of UK life sciences company Abcam plans to vote against a proposed $5.7bn acquisition by US group Danaher, pushing instead to replace the board and take back the reins as chief executive. 

Jonathan Milner, who has a 6.1 per cent stake in the Cambridge-based company, argues the $24-a-share deal materially undervalues Abcam, which creates custom antibodies, among other products, for scientists to use in research.

He is concerned that management may not have given other buyers enough consideration, and questions whether they prioritised negotiating their own bonuses rather than getting the best deal for shareholders. 

Shares in Abcam were trading at $23.36 before the deal was announced in late August, having risen about 40 per cent after Milner launched a campaign for changes on the board in late May.  

He said he had spoken to other shareholders and analysts who shared his concern, and was now requesting an emergency general meeting to try to replace the board, including putting himself forward as the company’s new chief. 

“The fact remains that there is a smoking gun that this was not a fair and full process because of the timing of it and the rumours around other bidders not getting a look in,” he told the Financial Times. 

He said Danaher’s forecasts for Abcam’s performance in 2024 were “so ridiculously materially different” from the company’s own guidance that it was “really quite alarming”. For example, Danaher forecast an 11 per cent lower earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation margin than the middle range of Abcam’s guidance.

Abcam said Danaher’s offer was the “highest and best price” received after a “thorough and extensive sale process”, engaging with more than 30 potential counterparties, including more than 20 potential strategic acquirers.

“It is unfortunate that Jonathan Milner has prejudged the deal without the full facts that will be published in the scheme circular,” the company said. “We look forward to engaging with shareholders about the full extent of the process and the value maximising proposition of the transaction for shareholders post publication of the scheme circular.”

Milner launched Abcam in 1998, spinning it out from work he was doing at the University of Cambridge. He was replaced by the current chief Alan Hirzel in 2014 but remained on the board until 2020. 

Milner argues that the company has been mismanaged since his departure from the board, with poor governance, cost control and execution. In late May, he launched a campaign to overhaul the board and nominated himself for the post of executive chair. A month later, he withdrew his plans after the company said it was pursuing strategic alternatives. 

Milner is also advocating for Abcam to list on the main market of the London Stock Exchange after it dropped its Aim listing last year in favour of a sole listing on Nasdaq. Milner believes Abcam should maintain its presence on Nasdaq, where most British biotechs go public, but could also benefit from renewed interest in the sector from UK fund managers. 

“The appetite in the UK at the moment is really bullish,” he said. “I want to fly the flag for British biotech, to keep Abcam plc headquarters in the UK, protect UK jobs and protect its mission. All of those things are in danger.”

Danaher did not comment on Milner’s comments on the deal valuation but said it was committed to keeping Abcam headquartered in the UK, where it employs almost 5,500 people.

Event details and information
Decentrali

FT : Defence tech start-up Helsing raises funds at €1.5bn valuation from Saab

Defence tech start-up Helsing raises funds at €1.5bn valuation from Saab
€209mn deal is latest example of sector defying VC downturn amid Ukraine war, and rising tensions between China and west

European defence technology start-up Helsing has raised €209mn to develop its software that is used to support militaries across Europe, in the latest example of how the sector is defying the venture capital downturn amid the Ukraine war and rising tensions between China and the west.

US venture capital firm General Catalyst led the deal with participation from Swedish defence group Saab. It reflects increased investor interest in the defence tech sector after many had shied away from it in recent years.

Saab said that it was paying €75mn for a 5 per cent stake in Helsing.

That would imply a valuation of €1.5bn for Munich-based Helsing, before including any new funds raised. Company executives declined to comment on the valuation.

Founded in 2021, Helsing uses software to process vast amounts of data and analyse that information rapidly to help militaries in their decision making.

The company has previously received financing from Spotify co-founder Daniel Ek’s investment company, Prima Materia, which backed Helsing in 2021 with €100mn at a valuation of just over €400mn

Helsing’s 220 employees work across offices in London, Paris, and Berlin in addition to Munich.

The group’s latest funding comes as the Ukraine conflict has focused attention not just on hardware such as tanks and ammunition, but also proven to be a showcase for innovative technologies such as sensors, robotics and unmanned systems. Some of these have been developed by smaller, technology-led companies.

In December, US-based defence technology start-up Anduril raised nearly $1.5bn in a deal valuing the company at $7bn, excluding the new cash it raised, in one of the biggest venture capital rounds of the year.

The success of the newer players’ equipment on the battlefield has highlighted the challenges defence industry incumbents face to keep up with the rapid advances offered by more agile technology companies. 

“We felt there was a big capability gap because defence was clearly becoming a software problem,” said Torsten Reil, Helsing’s co-chief executive. “But the companies in the space are largely hardware companies and it is very difficult for hardware companies to make cutting-edge software.”

The war in Ukraine and geopolitical tensions with China have led US venture capitalists in particular to boost their bets on defence technology. US VCs agreed more than 200 defence and aerospace deals in the first five months of this year, worth nearly $17bn — more than the sector raised during the whole of 2019, according to data from PitchBook.

Helsing’s support to Ukraine includes deploying personnel to the country, company executives said.

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls
  • Upgrades:
    • Carnival (CCL) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Redburn Atlantic; tgt $23
    • Etsy (ETSY) upgraded to Outperform from Peer Perform at Wolfe Research; tgt $100
    • First Bancorp (FBNC) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at DA Davidson; tgt lowered to $34
    • First Solar (FSLR) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets; tgt $237
    • JFrog (FROG) upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at William Blair
    • MetLife (MET) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Jefferies; tgt raised to $72
    • Norwegian Cruise Line (NCLH) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Redburn Atlantic; tgt $25
    • Oracle (ORCL) upgraded to Buy from Hold at DZ Bank; tgt $125
    • Prudential (PRU) upgraded to Hold from Underperform at Jefferies; tgt raised to $93
    • Rio Tinto (RIO) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan
    • Semtech (SMTC) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Summit Insights
    • Semtech (SMTC) upgraded to Positive from Neutral at Susquehanna; tgt $30
    • Virtu Financial (VIRT) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Citigroup; tgt $20
  • Downgrades:
    • Arco Platform (ARCE) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan; tgt lowered to $14
    • CS Disco (LAW) downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at MoffettNathanson; tgt $9
    • Carrier Global (CARR) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Mizuho; tgt lowered to $61
    • Digital Turbine (APPS) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $8
    • Frontier Group Holdings (ULCC) downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at TD Cowen; tgt lowered to $8
    • IBEX Ltd. (IBEX) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt lowered to $18
    • J.M. Smucker (SJM) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $145
    • MSCI (MSCI) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Redburn Atlantic; tgt lowered to $554
    • RTX (RTX) downgraded to Hold from Buy at DZ Bank; tgt $79
    • RTX (RTX) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $75
    • Semtech (SMTC) downgraded to Hold from Buy at The Benchmark Company
    • Telefonica S.A. (TEF) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas
  • Others:
    • BJ's Wholesale (BJ) initiated with an Outperform at TD Cowen; tgt $80
    • Dragonfly Energy (DFLI) initiated with a Buy at ROTH MKM; tgt $4
    • Fortrea (FTRE) initiated with an In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt $31
    • First Advantage Corp. (FA) initiated with an Outperform at Wolfe Research; tgt $17
    • Hecla Mining (HL) resumed with an Outperform at BMO Capital Markets; tgt $5.50
    • Herbalife Nutrition (HLF) initiated with a Neutral at DA Davidson; tgt $13.50
    • HireRight Holdings (HRT) initiated with a Peer Perform at Wolfe Research
    • Moody's (MCO) initiated with an Outperform at Wolfe Research; tgt $390
    • RAPT Therapeutics (RAPT) initiated with a Buy at Berenberg; tgt $34
    • S&P Global (SPGI) initiated with an Outperform at Wolfe Research; tgt $453
    • Sterling Check Corp. (STER) assumed with a Peer Perform at Wolfe Research

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • SMTC +2.8%, LH +0.9% (guidance), DV +0.6% (closes Scibids acquisition; provides updates to guidance)
Other news:
  • KITT +17.4% (enters service contract with Shell plc (SHEL))
  • AMC +7.5% (completes at-the-market equity offering)
  • SCNI +5.3% (reports preclinical results for plaque psoriasis treatment)
  • AVXL +4.4% (announces that a follow-on analysis of the landmark Phase 2b/3 study to treat early Alzheimer's disease with the investigational drug blarcamesine did demonstrate a statistically significant slowing in cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer's disease)
  • HSTM +4.3% (authorizes new $10 mln share repurchase program)
  • YUMC +3.9% (unveils "RGM 2.0" strategy and introduces 3-year financial targets at 2023 Investor Day)
  • DVAX +2.3% (supply agreement with Avecia)
  • DDD +2.1% (DDD delivers signed merger agreement to SSYS)
  • SSYS +2% (DDD delivers signed merger agreement to SSYS)
  • FFIE +2% (delivered its vehicle to realtor and Netflix Star Jason Oppenheim at the "Delivery Co-Creation Day")
  • TRIN +1.8% (increases dividend)
Analyst comments:
  • ETSY +3.6% (upgraded to Outperform from Peer Perform at Wolfe Research)
  • FSLR +2.2% (upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets)
  • NCLH +2% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Redburn Atlantic)
  • CCL +1.7% (upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Redburn Atlantic)

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • IBEX -12.7%
Other news:
  • BNOX -19.6% (Announces Update on the a7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (nAChR) Positive Allosteric Modulator (PAM) Collaboration with MSD)
  • IE -13.5% (files for $150 mln share offering)
  • PCT -10% (provided Notice after hours of a Force Majeure Event; intends to engage with the Trustee regarding required adjustments to the September Milestone)
  • GENI -9.9% (commences 20.0 mln share offering)
  • VTLE -7% (to significantly increase Permian Basin Scale through accretive transactions; also stock offering)
  • ALNY -5.5% (announces outcome of FDA advisory committee meeting on patisiran)
  • V -2.3% (announced after hours that it is engaging with its common stockholders on the subject of potential amendments that would authorize Visa to conduct an exchange offer program)
  • SBOW -2% (prices offering of 4.0 mln shares of common stock by co and selling shareholders at $37.00 per share)
  • IMAX -1.9% (expands strategic relationship with Prime Focus into streaming ecosystem)
  • CTLP -1.5% (to delay 10-K filing)
  • EPRT -1.2% (commences 8.7 mln share offering)
Analyst comments:
  • APPS -3.9% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)
  • CARR -1.3% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Mizuho)
  • SJM -0.8% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities)

Le Monde : En Suisse, les clients sulfureux d’un respectable gestionnaire de for

En Suisse, les clients sulfureux d’un respectable gestionnaire de fortune
Une fuite de données révèle que le cabinet Finaport a travaillé pour plusieurs personnalités à haut risque, issues de l’élite russe ou impliquées dans des affaires de corruption.

En Suisse, Finaport est l’une de ces entreprises respectables que la place financière aime à promouvoir. Ce cabinet de gestion de fortune basé à Zurich revendique plus de deux milliards d’euros de placements financiers et immobiliers. Il gère, pour le compte d’une clientèle triée sur le volet, les relations avec les banques et les cabinets d’immatriculation de sociétés offshore. Mais surtout, en tant que porte d’entrée sur le système financier, il est censé être la première vigie dans la lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent : la loi lui impose des vérifications strictes sur les antécédents et l’origine des fonds de ses clients.

Or, des documents confidentiels révèlent que Finaport a, jusque très récemment, géré les fonds de plusieurs personnalités soupçonnées de corruption ou visées par des poursuites judiciaires. La présence parmi elles de plusieurs membres de l’élite russe au profil sulfureux ne manquera pas de relancer le débat sur la complaisance de la Suisse à l’égard de l’argent russe, ravivé par la guerre en Ukraine. Cette enquête menée par Le Monde, en collaboration avec plusieurs médias internationaux, questionne également la surveillance par les autorités des cabinets de gestion de fortune qui, moins exposés que les grandes banques, jouent pourtant un rôle crucial dans l’attractivité financière du pays.

Ces révélations trouvent leur source dans les archives de Finaport, publiées sur le dark Net par un groupe cybercriminel en début d’année après un piratage par un rançongiciel, et repérées par la Radio-Télévision suisse. Le Monde et ses partenaires ont choisi d’exploiter cette fuite de documents malgré son origine criminelle en raison de leur intérêt public. Extrêmement récentes, ces données permettent en effet de lever le voile sur des pratiques en cours sur une place financière suisse qui se prévaut d’avoir nettoyé les écuries d’Augias, après avoir été frappée au cours de la dernière décennie par une série de scandales retentissants (Swiss Leaks, UBS, Suisse Secrets, etc.).

Un million de dollars de pots-de-vin
Si Finaport ne travaille pour aucun oligarque russe sous sanctions, plusieurs des profils de clients mis en lumière par cette fuite de données posent question, pour un cabinet à la réputation jusqu’alors irréprochable. Comme Leonid Reiman, ministre puis conseiller de Vladimir Poutine, entre 1999 et 2008, dont Finaport a géré la fortune entre 2008 et 2021. Les centaines de millions d’euros qui ont circulé au fil des années sur les différents comptes de M. Reiman, hébergés par les banques Julius Baer et Compagnie monégasque de banque, à Monaco, ne cadrent pas avec ses rémunérations officielles, bien inférieures. De quoi réactiver le soupçon d’un détournement massif de fonds publics, alors que l’ancien ministre a déjà été reconnu coupable en 2006 par une cour arbitrale suisse de malversations autour de la vente litigieuse d’un groupe de télécom russe dans les années 1990.

Parmi les nombreux clients russes de Finaport figure également Anatoly Pshegornitsky, un homme d’affaires qui s’est enrichi avec des contrats publics dans le secteur de l’énergie. Le cabinet zurichois a géré ses placements, son yacht et son appartement à Monaco au moins jusqu’au printemps 2022, alors que son nom est mêlé depuis plusieurs années à une affaire de corruption retentissante – dans laquelle il conteste, par la voix de ses avocats, toute responsabilité.

Finaport a également offert ses services à Gustavo Fernando Salazar Delgado, un ancien dirigeant sportif péruvien mouillé dans le gigantesque scandale Odebrecht/« Lava Jato ». Il est accusé par la justice de son pays d’avoir fait transiter plus d’un million de dollars (plus de 930 000 euros) de pots-de-vin vers un responsable politique local par l’intermédiaire de ses sociétés offshore, en 2013. Quelques mois plus tard, il ouvrait, avec l’aide de Finaport, un compte dans la banque suisse Julius Baer, doté de plus de 100 000 dollars. Sollicité, il n’a pas donné suite, comme l’immense majorité des clients cités dans cette enquête.

Haaretz : Israel's President Herzog Asked Macron's Help in Lifting Sanctions on

Israel's President Herzog Asked Macron's Help in Lifting Sanctions on Putin-aligned Jewish Oligarch
U.K., EU have slapped sanctions on Moshe Kantor following Russia's invasion of Ukraine ■ Sources say Herzog raised issue following requests from Jewish organizations

Israeli President Isaac Herzog asked French President Emmanuel Macron for assistance in lifting sanctions against Moshe Kantor, a Jewish Russian oligarch considered close to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Haaretz has learned.

The sanctions were imposed by the U.K. and the EU following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. According to sources at the President's Office, Herzog raised the matter in a phone call with Macron following requests from leaders of Jewish organizations.

Kantor, a major shareholder in Russian fertilizer firm Acron and the former longtime president of the European Jewish Congress, has donated millions of shekels for years to Jewish organizations in Europe and to various bodies in Israel. According to sources in the president’s residence, Herzog raised the issue in a telephone conversation with Macron following appeals from heads of Jewish organizations.

London listed Kantor, a triple citizen of Russia, Britain and Israel who had been living in London for over a decade, among eight “oligarchs” active in industries “which Putin uses to prop up his war economy.”

He has denied the allegations against him, and claimed that the decision to impose sanctions on him constitutes an injustice.

Following his election as president of the European Jewish Congress, some Jewish community leaders warned that the elevation of a Putin associate would damage the EJC in Brussels due to the tension between Russia and the EU. However, in an interview with Haaretz, Kantor insisted that his association with Putin serves the interests of the Jewish people.

After being sanctioned, Kantor stepped down from his role as president of the congress, although he retained control over a Luxembourg-based nonprofit he used to fund various European Jewish organizations for the better part of a year afterward, only relinquishing direct control following a Haaretz investigation into his continuing stewardship of the charity.

According to sources, Herzog and Macron’s conversation about Kantor took place about a week after the Israeli president met with Kantor’s handpicked successor at the European Jewish Congress, Ariel Muzicant, in Austria.

“I’m shocked,” one European Jewish leader, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said of Herzog’s call with Macron. “What else can you say? It’s not appropriate.”

The European Jewish Congress, which was largely funded by Kantor prior to his resignation, has suffered financially due to the sanctions, tightening budgets and cutting security assistance to at least one community. In response, the group began its own lobbying campaign, arguing that its former leader’s inclusion on the list threatened “the well-being and safety of our communities.”

In an open letter to the French president published in French news magazine Le Point last month, Muzicant wrote that “nothing is more false” than the charge that Kantor is “part of the group of oligarchs that surrounds [Putin] and is helping him in his war against Ukraine.”

Other figures associated with the European Jewish Congress have also lobbied Macron on Kantor’s behalf. Last year, Boris Lozhkin, the President of the Jewish Confederation of Ukraine, and Yaakov Dov Bleich, one of the country’s two chief rabbis, called for Paris to “oppose any renewal of the decision to sanction him, not only for his sake but also for the sake of Europe’s Jewish communities who lost a trusted and respected leader.”

Despite his supporters’ claims, Kantor has exhibited close ties to Putin during his time leading the European Jewish Congress, including through his endorsement of the Russian president’s proposal, made during a 2015 meeting with the European Jewish Congress’ Executive Committee, that Western European Jews migrant to Russia to escape antisemitism.

He also was responsible for bringing Putin to Jerusalem in 2020 as part of his World Holocaust Forum, at which the Russian president falsely claimed that 40 percent of the Jews who died in the Holocaust were citizens of the Soviet Union.

Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks to the media after the summit of Caspian Sea littoral states in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan in June 2022.Credit: Dmitry Azarov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP
In a recent interview with Austrian newspaper Der Standard, Muzicant blamed Warsaw, which he accused of harboring a “vendetta” against Kantor, for the sanctions, and indicated that he had pushed for greater support for Kantor from Austria, Germany, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Italy.

Hungary has reportedly pushed for sanctions relief on his behalf.

The European Jewish Congress subsequently leveled allegations of state-sponsored antisemitism against Poland, claiming that Warsaw’s criticism of Kantor constituted an assault on organized Jewry across the continent.

These attacks on Poland came after Warsaw appointed a temporary administrator to take control of Kantor’s stake in fertilizer maker Grupa Azoty, arguing that “there is no room for capital linked to Russian authorities in Poland.”

Kantor’s company said that it will challenge the move in the Polish courts, the European Court of Justice and through international arbitration. A person familiar with the details told Haaretz that Kantor is working to remove the sanctions imposed on him in other countries as well.

FT : SoftBank-backed Arm prices shares at $51 apiece ahead of IPO

SoftBank-backed Arm prices shares at $51 apiece ahead of IPO
Move values UK chip designer at more than $52bn as it prepares to begin trading on Thursday

Shares in UK chip designer Arm have been priced at $51 apiece before trading begins on Thursday, giving the company a market valuation of $52.3bn.

The price is at the top end of a range of $47-$51 a share due to high demand that resulted in its stock being more than five times oversubscribed.

The listing has been watched closely as a barometer for tech initial public offerings. It is the largest listing in two years since electric-truck maker Rivian debuted in 2021, raising about $12bn. Tech valuations have slumped from their coronavirus pandemic-era highs in the past 18 months amid economic uncertainty and rising interest rates.

The IPO will raise about $4.9bn for SoftBank, which has offered 9.4 per cent of the company’s stock. After the IPO, the Japanese group will still control roughly 90 per cent of the company’s shares.

The pricing means Arm’s market capitalisation ahead of the start of trading on Thursday, based on the number of shares outstanding after the IPO, stands at $52.3bn. On a fully diluted basis, if all stock options and other rights are exercised, Arm is valued at $54.5bn.

Big Tech customers of Arm’s chip designs, including Apple, Google, Nvidia, Samsung, Intel and TSMC, have indicated they would buy $735mn worth of Arm shares at the IPO price.

The banks underwriting the listing closed orders for shares on Tuesday, a day earlier than planned. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and BofA Securities are among a 28-strong army of banks selling the Arm IPO.

Earlier on Wednesday, several bankers involved in the IPO said they expected the price to reach as high as $52 a share.

High demand has helped to crack open a window for tech listings in the US after a dearth of deals this year.

On Monday, the San Francisco-based ecommerce company Instacart announced the price range for an IPO that would raise up to $616mn. On a fully diluted basis the listing would value the group at up to $9.3bn, less than a quarter of its private valuation two years ago.

Marketing automation company Klaviyo also announced its IPO pricing on Monday. It said it would sell 19.2mn shares at a range of $25 to $27 a share. This would value the company at up to $6.3bn. It was last valued by venture capitalists at $9.5bn.

SoftBank paid $32bn to acquire Arm in 2016, but the IPO price will be below the $64bn valuation implied less than a month ago in a transaction with its own Vision Fund, the $100bn Saudi-backed investment vehicle the Japanese company manages.

Arm’s core market of smartphone chips has stagnated this year, but it is hoping for growth from artificial intelligence and data centre customers, despite playing only a peripheral role in the technology required to build the kinds of large language models that power ChatGPT and other generative AI systems.

SoftBank originally hoped the deal would value Arm at as much as $70bn. However, it reported flat sales in its latest financial year, and investors have expressed concerns about a drop in profits in the past quarter and the company’s exposure to multiple risks in China.

FT : Biden’s ‘ownership’ of pump prices spells trouble


Biden’s ‘ownership’ of pump prices spells trouble
Petrol prices are back in the headlines. 

Official government stats released yesterday showed that a jump in what Americans are shelling out at the pump had pushed US inflation to 3.7 per cent per cent in August, up from 3.2 per cent in July. 

The data will have caused blood pressure to rise in the White House, where Joe Biden’s team, staring down the barrel of an election year, is frantically trying to convince Americans that the president’s sweeping “Bidenomics” programme is making life better for everyday people. 

The forecourt squeeze is not helping that message. Motorists are now paying an average of $3.85 a gallon for petrol (gasoline on this side of the pond). That figure seems to be edging up daily, according to the AAA: in the last week alone prices are up 5 cents. 

And with crude extending its shift northwards in recent days, in the wake of Saudi Arabia and Russia’s decision to extend production and export cuts to the end of the year, the pinch at the pump is unlikely to let up any time soon. 

Brent settled yesterday at $91.88 a barrel and analysts now reckon $100 oil is not far off. 

As David and I wrote last week, fuel price inflation — visible as it is in shining lights along highways across the country — tends to play an outsized role in voter perceptions of the economy.

Despite having fallen from record levels over $5 a gallon last summer prices are now up by a quarter since the beginning of the year – and more than 60 per cent since Biden took office.

Already Republican politicians are trying to pin the blame on the current administration. Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor and Republican presidential contender, slammed the president for souring relations with the Saudi crown prince. Donald Trump, the front runner for his party’s nomination, lashed out at Biden’s climate policies. 

“Voter perceptions tend to be sticky,” said Kevin Book, managing partner at ClearView Energy in Washington. “That means that a high price today could be a problem next year, even if the price relents.”

In fact, Biden has tied his fate to petrol prices more tightly than any of his predecessors, Book noted: by opting to deploy oil from the country’s strategic petroleum reserve on an unprecedented scale, he “took ownership of the gas price”.

As Jake Sullivan, the president’s national security adviser, said last week:

“It’s really the price of a gallon of gas for the American consumer . . . that is going to be his ultimate metric for whether we’re succeeding or not.”

The move by Riyadh and Moscow to prop up prices has been surprisingly effective, removing 1.3mn b/d from the market, most likely until the end of the year. As the International Energy Agency put it yesterday: “The Saudi-Russian alliance is proving a formidable challenge for oil markets.”

And while the unleashing of SPR barrels on to the market last year coupled with a resiliency of growth in the shale patch ultimately helped to tamp down the surge, this time around options are more limited. 

Benjamin Hoff, global head of commodity strategy at Société Générale, noted that on top of the shale patch’s insistence on capital discipline, the recent uptick in M&A was removing barrels from production, further decelerating domestic output growth.

Meanwhile, Biden’s capacity to again tap the SPR — now at its lowest level since the early 1980s — has become much more complicated.

“The ability of the US to be the blunting force to Opec+ and Saudi Arabia, that it has been historically, has been massively reduced,” Hoff told ES. 

“We’re in a situation where there’s actually not a huge amount the US can do.”

A laxer approach by Washington on sanctions is one option that is likely to come to the fore. A return to browbeating domestic producers is another. 

Whatever the approach, what happens with oil prices over the coming months will play a big role in determining whether the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue will find himself house hunting this time next year.