>>> Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Barr: See higher probability than before for

Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Barr: See higher probability than before for a soft landing; There has been a lot of progress on inflation
- Economic activity has been considerably more resilient than expected
- Baseline projection is for below potential growth over the next year and further softening in the labor market; Labor market is tight but supply and demand are coming into better balance
- The full effects of past tightening are yet to come in the months ahead
- Bank supervisors expect banks to be ready and willing to use the discount window
- Monetary policy is best served by focusing on macroeconomic objectives
- The most important question at this point is not whether an additional rate increase is needed this year, but rather how long we will need to hold rates at a sufficiently restrictive level to achieve our goals
- We are at a point where we can 'proceed carefully' on monetary policy (echoing Chair Powell)
- I expect some further softening in the US labor market
- I'm highly attuned to risks to both of the Fed's mandates
- Monetary policy cannot be indifferent to financial risks
- Most banks are managing interest rate risk well
- Not anywhere close to lower bond level for bank reserves

- Q&A: Affirms confidence that we can get to the 2% inflation target
- Likely we are at or near sufficiently restrictive level of rates; Likely we will have to keep rates up for some time
- The amount of credit tightening we are seeing is less than what I feared in March
- It seems like we are seeing the right kind of slowing in the housing market; Goods and housing services inflation is on the right path downward

>>> Biden Administration said to tell China to expect updated rules curbing ship

Biden Administration said to tell China to expect updated rules curbing shipments of AI chips as soon as this month - press
- US official says the PRC has been notified to expect updated rules on AI chips around the one year anniversary of the original rules issued on Oct 7th, 2022. The 'heads up' to Chinese officials is seen by the US as an effort to stabilize relations with the Chinese govt.
- The timing of the new rules has been weighed on by the Biden administration's efforts to ensure that China President Xi will attend the APEC summit in San Francisco in November (14-16th)

WSJ : How AI May Change Entrepreneurship

How AI May Change Entrepreneurship
From coming up with an idea to creating a marketing plan, artificial intelligence adds a whole new element to starting a business

Artificial intelligence is about to change how entrepreneurs start companies—and the odds of making them successful.

Systems such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Microsoft’s Bing and Google’s Bard can assist in almost every step of devising a startup, from coming up with an idea and testing it to performing consumer research and creating a marketing plan. They do those jobs faster and more efficiently than an individual could, and in ways that a human isn’t capable of carrying out.

“In 12 months, it’s going to be a very different way of starting a company,” says Steve Blank, a longtime entrepreneur who helped launch tech companies including MIPS and Convergent Technologies, and is an investor in an AI cancer-diagnosis company.

Below are some of the ways AI can aid entrepreneurs—as well as some caveats about the technology’s limitations.

Generating the bright idea
Finding an unmet need is the first step in creating a startup. It takes inspiration and intuition, careful research and the balancing of risk and reward. And it may turn out that AI can do this faster and more efficiently than any human ever could.

Such systems “could eventually become some of the best identifiers of unmet human needs in history,” says David Schonthal, director of entrepreneurship programs at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.

That is because AI can absorb vast amounts of information and sort through it to figure out what people might want in the marketplace. “AI reads a bunch of data to identify patterns in that data, it acts upon what it senses and then it learns based on what it puts out in the world,” Schonthal says.

That is what entrepreneurs do, he says. But entrepreneurs “are limited by the constraints of their own capacity, their own reach and their biases,” he says. “AIs have an exponentially wider set of data to learn from.”

For instance, an entrepreneur could ask an AI system to identify problems consumers face in using certain products or services, and then have it suggest solutions, says Ethan Mollick, an associate professor who teaches innovation and entrepreneurship at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. The entrepreneur could add limiting factors, such as the cost of each proposed solution. The system may come up with dozens of ideas and variations that an entrepreneur may not have considered, Mollick says.

AI can also help focus an idea. AI systems can be asked questions and then respond: For instance, entrepreneurs can ask the AI to refine its answers, such as to consider a different variable in a startup proposal like whether a product would be popular abroad or whether it could be priced higher. Or entrepreneurs can ask an AI to give an example of a similar product that thrived—or flopped.

“It’s like having the best business-school coach you could have,” says Blank, the entrepreneur.

Surveying the competition
Sure, entrepreneurs may think they have a smart idea for a startup. But perhaps a dozen people already have thought of it. The vast databases that AI systems draw from can provide a bigger research reach than typical internet searches.

Using AI, entrepreneurs can see what has been reported about a business concept in technical reports, financial filings and news articles. They can scan marketing and consumer surveys and check what has been said on social media about related startups. They can see what types of startups were failures and which have thrived.

Testing the concept
Even if entrepreneurs think their startup idea is smart and investment-worthy, they need to test their hunch. AI could help by playing the part of a customer based on a digital persona founders give it.

For example, if a company concept involves the dental industry, entrepreneurs could tell an AI system to pretend it is a dentist with 20 years of experience who runs their own practice. Then the entrepreneur would ask questions about what constraints the “dentist” faces in doing the job and whether the proposed product or service would help.

“You can have a reasonable interview with it,” Mollick says of the dentist persona. “You will not get the same stuff you get out of a human. But if it helps you refine an idea, it’s really valuable.”

The negligible cost and great speed of AI testing is a plus, says Blank. “I could run experiments against hundreds of thousands of different personas simultaneously and I could create websites with artificial products that I could test,” he says.

Moreover, an AI-based system could boost the use of “A/B” testing, in which two or more versions of a website or product promotion are put online to see which generates greater or more positive response. AI could create numerous versions of the tests, promote them through social media and targeted advertising, and then constantly refine the tests based on the responses, says Northwestern’s Schonthal.

Creating a business pitch
AI could also help devise and critique the business pitches that entrepreneurs send to venture capitalists. And it could help an entrepreneur figure out which VC firms are funding what types of startups—and which they are rejecting.

Mollick had one of his classes create startup proposals, then had an AI system—instructed to act like a venture capitalist—critique them. The AI system told the students whether it thought the proposals were unique, potentially profitable, addressed a market need and whether they adequately accounted for factors such as competition and the ability to scale up.

“I had a real VC critiquing them and then the AI VC critiquing them,” Mollick says, and the real VC thought the AI critiques were on the mark.

Promoting a new company
Once a company is funded, it needs to get promoted. Mollick ran an experiment to see how AI could assist in promoting an educational game. “What it accomplished was superhuman,” he says.

First, he asked Bing to find detailed information about the game, an online tool created by Wharton for teaching leadership to business students. Next, he told Bing to pretend it was a marketing expert and come up with a proposed promotional campaign. It produced a credible plan, including identifying the target audience and creating four sample emails touting the game to business educators.

In just 30 minutes, the AI systems that he used “did market research, created a positioning document, wrote an email campaign, created a website [for the product], created a logo and ‘hero shot’ [large centerpiece] graphic, made a social-media campaign for multiple platforms, and scripted and created a video,” Mollick said in a blog post describing the experiment.

Without AI tools, it would have taken him “many hours, maybe days of work,” he wrote.

Not a magic potion
Yet as with all users of AI, entrepreneurs need to be cautious. These systems are notorious for “hallucinations”—giving answers that sound authoritative but are misleading or even made up. What they spew out needs to be verified, experts say.

“I wouldn’t trust any numbers it’s giving you,” Mollick says.

AI presents another concern: It could come up with ideas that are “literal and obvious, which is a way to not necessarily be successful,” says Northwestern’s Schonthal. “What AIs will do is sense what people say they want, which is often different from what they truly desire.”

As a hypothetical example, an AI system could discover that sales of cheese are rising, and in response propose creating a new cheese-distribution system instead of “a truly innovative new business,” Schonthal says. “That abstract piece of the process is still a uniquely human capability.”

Moreover, most AI systems are “trained” on databases of things that happened in the past. “Good entrepreneurs are the ones that are thinking about what might happen in the future,” he says.

FT Lex : Sampo/Mandatum: demerger gives Nordic insurer new lease of life

Sampo/Mandatum: demerger gives Nordic insurer new lease of life
The move will make Sampo the largest pure property and casualty insurer in the region


Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

Low interest rates largely explain the poor performance of life insurers over the past decade. Add low premium growth in developed economies to that and a change of gear at Finland’s Sampo makes sense.

On Monday, the Helsinki-based business completed the demerger of its life business Mandatum, whose shares valued the spin-off at €1.9bn. A dip in Sampo shares suggested little value creation on the day, yet a broader plan to focus on non-life sectors still deserves credit.

The move will make Sampo the largest pure property and casualty insurer in the Nordic region. The shares, along with those of peer Tryg, have long commanded a sizeable premium over the broader European insurance sector. Combined ratios for both close to 80 per cent reflect disciplined underwriting. Capital releases for shareholders will cement the spin-off’s logic.

The turnaround in interest rates is already helping. Sampo estimated its Solvency Capital Ratio would be 193 per cent following the split, at the top end of its targeted range. Higher rates mean insurers need to hold less capital against liabilities anyway. But shedding life exposures will also mean lower targeted capital and a surplus for shareholders. A 10 percentage point fall in targeted SCR would mean about €300mn of returns for Sampo shareholders. 

The story at Mandatum is similar. The standalone life business will generate capital in two ways. First, from its growth business managing pension assets for corporate clients. Second, from winding down an old back book of with-profits policies, generating capital as it does.

Mandatum’s standalone SCR is now at about 232 per cent. A target range of between 170-200 per cent is expected in the medium term. Even at the top end of that would mean an extra €300mn to come back to shareholders on top.

Add that on to the €500mn the company expects to return on ordinary dividends over the next three years and the annual yield moves to 15 per cent. Even in the higher rate environment, that should attract interest.

FT Lex : Rinehart/Liontown: heavy metal billionaire seeks something lighter

Rinehart/Liontown: heavy metal billionaire seeks something lighter
Albemarle’s margin for victory over buying lithium miner reduces every time Hancock increases its stake

Gina Rinehart made her billions from heavy metals. Australia’s richest person seeks one of the lightest, lithium. Her privately held iron ore miner Hancock Prospecting has built a 12.4 per cent stake in locally-listed Liontown Resources. She could block a proposed A$6.6bn ($4.3bn) takeover by Albemarle of the US.

Lithium carbonate prices may have crashed, down 68 per cent year on year. Demand for this key battery input will not do so in the long term. Electric vehicles depend on cells using lithium. Australia offers an important supply.

Rinehart has a reported worth of more than A$34bn. Hancock has plenty of firepower of its own. It last reported more than A$17bn of net cash with billions more piling up annually. Liontown, worth a third of that, sits on Australia’s fifth-largest lithium resource.

Rinehart set her cap at Liontown months ago. Keen to diversify from iron ore, she has been accumulating shares since early April, according to local filings. Her in-price sits below Albemarle’s latest agreed offer of A$3.00 a share.

Rinehart’s stake could yet climb over the current A$800mn. Under deal terms so far, the Albemarle takeover would require 75 per cent approval from shareholders. A vote will not happen until the board recommends the deal. It may not occur until next year, if at all.

Albemarle’s margin for victory reduces every time Hancock increases its stake. This occurred five times last month alone. If it goes over 20 per cent, a mandatory bid would be required. Team Rinehart has intimated it will not pay more than A$3.00 a share. Albemarle could raise its offer to tempt Reinhart to sell. Or perhaps it can work with Hancock as a minority investor.

That is possible. Lithium projects, given the mining and processing skills required, do suit partnerships. Albemarle has one at Wodgina, a larger local lithium project.

Either way, Liontown shareholders have nothing to lose as two industry heavyweights vie for their favour.

FT : Louis Dreyfus profits slide as boost from Ukraine war fades

Louis Dreyfus profits slide as boost from Ukraine war fades
Agricultural trading groups slip from record highs

Louis Dreyfus Company, one of the world’s biggest traders of coffee, sugar and wheat, suffered a fall in profits and sales as the boost from price volatility because of the war in Ukraine faded in its main markets.

The Switzerland-based trader generated net profits of $568mn in the first half of 2023, down from $662mn for the same period last year, while the group’s sales fell from $30.3bn to $25.8bn.

The profits of agricultural trading groups have slipped from the record highs seen in the past two years but they are still well above historical levels.

The Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a major supplier of grain and oilseeds to international markets, disrupted global supplies, sending food prices soaring and threatening a hunger crisis in many parts of the world. But for agricultural trading houses the volatility boosted sales and profits.

LDC’s net profit increased by 44 per cent in 2022 to more than $1bn, up from $697mn in 2021, as net sales went up by more than a fifth.

Prices of key agricultural commodities have since stabilised, with Chicago wheat futures falling from a peak of more than $13 a bushel in March 2022 to below $5.80 last month. Operating costs, meanwhile, have risen, slightly damping the performance of traders.

LDC’s chief rivals Archer-Daniels-Midland, ADM, and Bunge posted a decline in their second-quarter profits over the summer and last month Cargill, the largest privately held US company, reported a drop in profits of 43 per cent for its fiscal year ending May 31, according to documents seen by Bloomberg. 

But ADM and Bunge still beat analysts' expectations, with ADM posting adjusted earnings per share of $1.89, down only slightly from $2.5 in the second quarter of 2022, when the firm generated its highest-ever profits.

Despite declining profits, Cargill’s annual revenue also rose by 7.1 per cent to a record $176.7bn, according to Bloomberg.

LDC attributed its buoyant profits to high crop yields in Brazil and ample demand from China.

“While international trade flows progressively adapted to last year’s turbulent environment, some challenges persisted into 2023 — a context in which LDC pursued its focus on keeping essential food, feed, fibre and ingredient supply chains moving safely, reliably and responsibly,” said LDC’s chief executive Michael Gelchie in a statement.

Although prices of wheat and corn have fallen, the cost of other commodities traded by the group, such as sugar, rice and citrus fruit, have climbed recently as a result of the El Niño sea temperature phenomenon and rising temperatures due to climate change.

FT : Birkenstock targets over $9bn IPO valuation

Birkenstock targets over $9bn IPO valuation
German sandal maker sets price range for New York float next week

German sandal maker Birkenstock is set to be valued at more than $9bn in an initial public offering this month, the latest sign of a revival in the US market for new listings after a dearth of deals since the start of 2022.

Birkenstock said in an updated prospectus that it would sell stock at between $44 and $49 per share, which would raise up to $1.6bn for the company and its private equity owner L Catterton.

At the top of the price range, Birkenstock would have an initial market capitalisation of $9.2bn based on outstanding shares after the offering, or $9.9bn on a fully diluted basis.

L Catterton, which is backed by French luxury fashion house LVMH, is expected to list the business next week.

About a third of the proceeds of the deal will go to Birkenstock, which said it would use the funds to repay debt, with the rest going to L Catterton.

The company and its advisers have lined up anchor investors for the deal. Financière Agache, the family holding company of LVMH chief executive Bernard Arnault, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to $325mn of shares.

Arnault’s son Alexandre is expected to join the company’s board of directors following the IPO, according to the filing.

The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund and Durable Capital Partners plan to buy up to a further $300mn of shares.

The company almost had its plans to list thrown off course by a US government shutdown, which was narrowly averted when lawmakers reached a last-minute deal over the weekend.

Birkenstock, which traces its roots back to 1774, took private equity money for the first time when L Catterton bought a majority stake in a €4bn deal in 2021.

It reported revenues of €1.1bn in the nine months to the end of June, up 21 per cent year on year. However, net profits dropped 20 per cent to €103mn.

It is set to be the third-largest US listing of the year so far, according to Dealogic data.

Bankers have been hoping a successful deal from a well-known consumer brand such as Birkenstock will provide a further boost to the market after a string of tech listings in September.

“It will be important as it’s a different sector, so it gives a broader set of data [to encourage other potential IPO candidates],” said one senior IPO banker.

Arm, Instacart and Klaviyo all priced deals at the top of or above their target ranges last month, though trading in the stocks has been mixed in the weeks since. Overall, companies have raised $17.4bn in US IPOs so far this year, up more than 140 per cent from the same period last year.