>>> AI hedge fund VARA loses 44% in July as crowded tech bets unwind August 11,

AI hedge fund VARA loses 44% in July as crowded tech bets unwind

Value Aligned Research Advisors, a hedge fund built around the artificial intelligence investment theme, suffered a 44% loss in July as a sharp selloff in AI-related stocks hit crowded positions across the sector, according to a report by Bloomberg.

The report cites an unnamed person familiar with the performance as revealing that decline reduced gains for VARA’s flagship AI Fund to about 65% for the year through July. The strategy had been up almost 200% through June, according to an investor document.

The New Jersey-based firm managed about $26.4bn at the end of June, just 16 months after launching its hedge fund operations.

Founded by Ben Hoskin and David Field, VARA focuses on companies expected to benefit from the development of transformative AI, including businesses involved in AI infrastructure, data centres and power generation.

VARA reportedly declined to comment on its performance.

VARA’s portfolio has significant overlap with that of Situational Awareness, the AI-focused hedge fund founded by Leopold Aschenbrenner.

Regulatory filings showed that the two managers held 15 common stocks at the end of March. These included CoreWeave, Bloom Energy, IREN, Applied Digital, Core Scientific and Riot Platforms.

The overlapping positions accounted for about 93% of Situational Awareness’ disclosed stock portfolio by value, compared with roughly 27% for VARA.

The Information : Applied Compute in Talks to Double Valuation to $3 Billion on

Applied Compute in Talks to Double Valuation to $3 Billion on Open-Source Demand

The Takeaway
  • Year-old startup Applied Compute in talks to raise hundreds of millions of dollars at around a $3 billion valuation
  • Revenue recently jumped four-fold to around $50 million
  • Investor Elad Gil in talks to lead the round

Applied Compute, a year-old startup that helps companies run and customize open-source models with their own data, is discussing a new funding round that would value it at around $3 billion, more than double its valuation from a round announced four months ago, according to a person with knowledge of the funding.

The financing follows strong revenue growth in recent months. Applied Compute is currently generating around $50 million in annualized revenue, the person said, up nearly four times from what its CEO Yash Patil has said it was generating last November.

Investor Elad Gil is in talks to lead the round, which will likely be the hundreds of millions of dollars, the person said. It’s not clear if the valuation includes the new money. The funding round hasn’t yet closed, and its terms could change.

The fundraise also comes amid rising interest from companies looking to cut AI costs by using and customizing open-source models instead of shelling out money for Anthropic and OpenAI models. Such demand has also benefited startups like OpenRouter, which helps developers access and choose between hundreds of AI models, and inference providers such as Baseten and Fireworks, which help application developers train, customize and run primarily open-source AI models.

Former OpenAI researchers Patil, Rhythm Garg and Linden Li founded Applied Compute in 2025. The San Francisco-based startup helps businesses develop and train custom AI models for specific fields, like financial services and law. It does so through a technique called reinforcement learning, which works by rewarding models for accomplishing certain goals and penalizing them for other behaviors.

Applied Compute has said that it works with customers including food delivery service DoorDash, coding startup Cognition and data labeling firm Mercor to use those custom models to develop AI agents that can take actions on behalf of workers at those customers. Applied Compute is also working on methods to help agents learn and improve from real-world experiences, known as continual learning.

Applied Compute makes money through selling consulting services to businesses to help them customize models, as well as charging those businesses for compute to then run those models on the startup’s infrastructure.

The startup has previously raised $160 million in funding from investors including Kleiner Perkins, Benchmark, Sequoia Capital and Lux Capital.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 11th of Aug 2026 V2(+)

>>> Up
* Acerinox Raised to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 16.10 euros
* Aperam Raised to Overweight at JPMorgan; PT 57 euros
* Coloplast Raised to Hold at ABG; PT 460 kroner
* Gurit Raised to Hold at Research Partners; PT 25 Swiss francs (+)
* Icop Raised to Buy at Equita; PT 37 euros (+)
* Interroll Raised to Buy at Octavian; PT 1,832 Swiss francs
* Outokumpu Raised to Overweight at JPMorgan; PT 6.50 euros
* Saab Raised to Overweight at Barclays; PT 740 kronor

>>> Down
* Bergen Carbon Solutions Cut to Hold at Norne Securities (+)
* Carl Zeiss Meditec Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 22.60 euros
* Femsa ADRs Cut to Neutral at Grupo Santander; PT $130
* Gap Cut to Equal-Weight at Barclays; PT $20
* Legal & General Cut to Sell at Goldman; PT 257 pence
* Legal & General Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 280 pence
* M&G Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 330 pence
* Partners Group Cut to Hold at Deutsche Bank; PT 785 Swiss francs (+)
* Relais Group Cut to Accumulate at Inderes; PT 17 euros
* Royal Unibrew Cut to Hold at ABG; PT 490 kroner
* Under Armour Cut to Underweight at Barclays; PT $5
* YPF ADRs Cut to Neutral at Bradesco BBI; PT $55
* Zegna Group Cut to Underperform at BNP Paribas; PT $12.20

>>> Initiation
* Axactor Reinstated Buy at Arctic Securities; PT 6.50 kroner
* Babcock Reinstated Overweight at Barclays; PT 1,380 pence
* BAE Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 2,200 pence
* CSG NV Rated New Underweight at Barclays; PT 19 euros
* CSG NV Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 18 euros
* Hugo Boss Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT 50 euros
* Kongsberg Rated New Overweight at Barclays; PT 440 kroner
* Leonardo Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 70 euros
* RENK Group Rated New Overweight at Barclays; PT 60 euros
* Rheinmetall Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 1,600 euros
* Saab Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 600 kronor
* Schneider Electric Reinstated Buy at William O'Neil
* Thales Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 330 euros
* Valneva ADRs Rated New Buy at TD Cowen; PT $12

>>> Call
* Carl Zeiss Meditec Cut to Sell at UBS on Rising China Risks (+)
* European Defense Stocks Get Upbeat New Coverage at RBC, Barclays
* Hugo Boss Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT Set at a Street-High (+)
* Partners Group Downgraded at DB on Evergreen Reset Concerns (+)
* Valneva ADRs Rated New Buy at TD Cowen on Lyme Vaccine Potential (+)

>>> The Second Derivative: Why No One Understands the AI Boom

Very interesting article : Https://www.groundbrkr.com/p/the-second-derivative-why-no-one

Here is a simple summary of the article "The Second Derivative: Why No One Understands the AI Boom" by Groundbreaker, along with its direct implications for AI trading.

1. Simple Summary of the Core Argument
The Basic Math Concept
  • The Level (Value): How much money AI companies are making or spending.

  • 1st Derivative (Velocity / Growth): How fast that revenue or compute spend is growing year-over-year.

  • 2nd Derivative (Acceleration): Whether the rate of growth is speeding up or slowing down.

The Main Thesis
Most investors treat the AI boom like the 2000 Dot-Com Bubble (equity hype driven by pure retail speculation). Groundbreaker argues it actually resembles the 2008 Great Financial Crisis (a credit and leverage market driven by interconnected debt and compute commitments).

  • The Trap: Huge AI capital expenditures (CapEx), GPU server debt, and multi-billion-dollar compute commitments are financed on the assumption that AI demand will keep accelerating (positive 2nd derivative).

  • The Turning Point: A crisis doesn't require AI spending or revenues to fall—it only requires the rate of growth to slow down (a negative 2nd derivative / deceleration).

  • The Cascade: If growth decelerates, a flagship model developer (like OpenAI) must cut back on future compute commitments. Because these commitments act as collateralized revenue for cloud vendors (e.g., CoreWeave, Oracle) who in turn owe chipmakers (e.g., Nvidia), a slowdown in acceleration triggers a chain-reaction credit crunch across the entire AI ecosystem.

2. Implications for AI Trading
📉 1. Equity Valuation Risk (Deceleration ≠ Contraction)
  • The Trap: Stock prices peak during the acceleration phase, go sideways during deceleration, and crash long before actual revenues turn negative.

  • Trading Takeaway: Relying solely on headline revenue growth (e.g., "Company X grew revenue 40% YoY!") is a lagging indicator. Once the rate of growth drops (e.g., from 80% to 40%), stock multiples compress rapidly. Watch quarter-over-quarter growth rates, not just total dollars.

🔗 2. Cross-Counterparty Contagion (Supply Chain Risk)
  • The AI boom is heavily circular: AI startups buy compute from cloud providers, who buy chips from Nvidia, while big tech invests in those same startups to boost cloud numbers.

  • Trading Takeaway: Heavily leveraged mid-tier playbooks (like specialized GPU cloud providers or debt-financed AI infrastructure firms) carry high systemic risk. If primary frontier labs scale back hardware commitments, counterparty risk spreads quickly down the supply chain.

📈 3. How to Position as a Trader
  • Divergence Trades: Look for companies with high cash reserves, strong balance sheets, and low debt-to-equity ratios. Companies relying heavily on debt or future compute obligations are the most vulnerable to a shift in acceleration.

  • Option Volatility: As the 2nd derivative slows, market sentiment switches from "fear of missing out" (FOMO) to "fear of bad debt." Expect high volatility and tail-risk repricing in high-beta AI infrastructure stocks.

  • Focus on Realized Monetization: The market will increasingly demand proof of end-user ROI (productivity gains, net software subscription increases) rather than hyper-scaler spending news.

>>> What to look at today - 11th of Aug 2026

Government bonds in Asia Pacific followed Treasuries lower as oil’s four-day rally revived inflation concerns ahead of key US consumer price data later this week. Gold advanced. Bonds dropped in Australia and New Zealand after US 10-year yields rose six basis points on Monday to 4.71%. Treasury futures also fell, with no cash Treasury trading during Asian hours Tuesday due to a public holiday in Japan. A Bloomberg gauge of the dollar held its gains from the previous session. Gold rose for a third day, climbing above $4,400 an ounce. Technical buying was spurred by the metal’s ascent through the 100-day moving average on Monday. Silver and platinum also advanced. Elsewhere, oil held a four-day gain after US President Donald Trump made sweeping new demands on Iran, clouding the outlook for a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Brent was steady around $87.75 a barrel after jumping 5% Monday. Oil’s rally over the past week has revived worries over price pressures after Friday’s softer-than-expected US jobs data tempered expectations for an immediate Federal Reserve interest-rate hike. Attention now turns to Wednesday’s US consumer price index report, which may offer fresh signals on the path for interest rates. Trump lashed out against Iran’s demands for compensation as part of talks to wind down the conflict, dimming hopes of a quick agreement that would reopen the strait.  The president had signaled on Sunday he was prepared to let economic pressure on Iran build, rather than launch fresh strikes. In other corners of the market, sentiment toward the technology sector remained buoyant, with South Korea’s Kospi Index climbing 1.2%. Samsung Electronics Co. was a standout with its shares gaining about 5%. The broader MSCI’s gauge of Asian equities edged up 0.2% after fluctuating between gains and losses.  Futures contracts for the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index rose 0.3%, while European shares were set for a flat start. The yen was also in focus in Asia after the currency weakened 1% Monday, erasing about half of its recent intervention-led rally. The move is psychologically significant for traders, who remain on alert for further official support. The yen was little changed Tuesday at around 159.25 per dollar. Meanwhile, the Australian dollar slipped after the central bank kept its key interest rate unchanged, wagering that higher unemployment and a weakening property market will weigh on economic activity sufficiently to cool inflation. Attention will now shift to the US consumer price index. The headline gauge probably rose 0.1% in July following a 0.4% decline in the prior month, based on the median projection in a Bloomberg survey of economists ahead of Wednesday’s Bureau of Labor Statistics release. Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said it’s possible that a number of rate hikes may be needed to bring inflation down to the target. US After Hours BW +36.9%, FF +20.6%, NIQ +16.9%, QMCO +15.3% sharply higher on earnings; FRMI +24.3% surging on lease agreement; UPWK -20.9%, LIF -19.8%, ELVA -17.6%, RKLB -7.8% lower on earnings.

Nikkei Closed Hang Seng -0.63% CSI +0.15% Kospi +1.39% Shanghai -0.05% Shenzen +0.44%

Eur$ 1.1541 CNH 6.7457 CNY 6.7450 JPY 159.19 GBP 1.3512 CHF 0.8102 RUB 82.5035 TRY 47.7371 WTI$ 82.41 +0.33% Gold 4,382 +0.51% BTC 63,982 -0.20% ETH 1,875 -0.15%

S&P +0.05% Nasdaq +0.18% EuroStoxx -0.03% FTSE -0.07% Dax +0.05% SMI -0.06%

Macro :
- Trump Makes Sweeping New Demands on Iran as Deal Hopes Dim
- Hong Kong May Expand Tax Breaks to Trading Firms, FT Says

Keep an eye on :
- ALC SW : Alcon AG 2Q Core EPS Beats Estimates
- AST US : AST SpaceMobile 2Q Revenue Misses Estimates
- BW US : Babcock & Wilcox Shares Soar After 2Q Revenue Crushes Estimates +35%
- BELL SW : Bell 1H Ebitda CHF173.2M Vs. CHF159.7M Y/y
- BHVN US : Biohaven 2Q Operating Expense Beats Estimates
- BP/ LN : BP to Sell 20% Stake in Venezuela’s Cocuina Gas Field: Reuters
- BP/ LN : Trinidad’s NGC Buys 20% Stake in BP’s Natural Gas Block
- COK GY : Cancom Maintains FY Ebitda Forecast
- CBK GY : UniCredit, Commerzbank CEOs Kick Off Talks on Control Change
- DMP GY : Dermapharm 1H Adjusted Ebitda EU163.2M Vs. EU148.0M Y/y
- GALD SW : Galderma Gets EU Approval for Chin Augmentation Injectible
- GPRO US : GoPro 2Q Adjusted Loss per Share 21C Vs. Loss/Shr 8.0C Y/y
- HIMS US : Hims & Hers Health 2Q Revenue Beats Estimates
- IDIA SW : Idorsia’s QUVIVIQ Class Gets DEA Reclassification Proposal
- ISS DC : ISS 1H Revenue Beats Estimates
- INTC US : Intel Is Said to Near Share Sale Upsize to Raise $20 Billion
- IHG LN : InterContinental Hotels 1H Pretax Profit Beats Estimates
- BGEO LN : Lion Finance Group 2Q Net Income Beats Estimates
- MC FP : Louis Vuitton Seeks Liquor License for New HK Store: Report
- 035420 KS : Naver Invests 10b Won in Anthropic Via VC Fund, Daily Reports
- NIQ US : NIQ Global Intelligence Widens FY Adj. Ebitda Margin Forecast
- NOEJ GY : Norma 2Q Adjusted Ebit EU7.6M
- NOVPB DC : Chinese Obesity Drug Stocks Rally on Gan & Lee Europe Deal
- NUS US : Nu Skin Cuts FY Revenue Forecast
- NVDA U : Nvidia Credit Default Swaps Jump on Reports About Mega Funding
- PLBY US : Playboy 2Q Net Revenue Beats Estimates
- PLUG US : Plug Power 2Q Net Revenue Beats Estimates
- PNE3 GY : PNE Gets Takeover Interest Indicated Below Market Share Value
- RIOT US : Anthropic Strikes $9 Billion Deal With Cloud Computing Firm Riot
- RKLB US : Rocket Lab 3Q Revenue Forecast Beats Estimates
- RVRC SS : RVRC Holding 4Q Net Sales Miss Estimates
- SZG GY : Salzgitter 1H Pretax Profit EU76.3M Vs. Loss EU83.8M Y/y
- SAN SM : Santander to Buy Back Up to €1.825b of Shares
- SPCX US : VinSpace Signs Launch Pact With SpaceX for 2027 Mission
- SPX LN : Spirax 1H Revenue Beats Estimates
- STORB SS : Storskogen 2Q Sales Beat Estimates
- TEG GY : TAG Immobilien Sees FY FFO I at Upper End of Guidance Range
- TECN SW : Tecan 1H Adjusted Ebitda Margin 15.1% Vs. 15% Y/y
- TWEKA NA : TKH 1H Adjusted Ebita EU113.7M Vs. EU80.2M Y/y
- UCG IM : UniCredit Loses Appeal in €400 Million Italian Tax Case, MF Says
- UN0 GY : Uniper Reports 1H Adj. Ebitda of EU711m vs EU379m y/y
- USAR US : USA Rare Earth Q2 Adj. EPS $(0.15) Misses $(0.13) Estimate, Sales $5.821M Miss $8.053M Estimate
- WAMI NO : Wallenius Wilhelmsen 2Q Ebit Misses Estimates

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 11th of Aug 2026

>>> Up
* Acerinox Raised to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 16.10 euros
* Aperam Raised to Overweight at JPMorgan; PT 57 euros
* Coloplast Raised to Hold at ABG; PT 460 kroner
* Interroll Raised to Buy at Octavian; PT 1,832 Swiss francs
* Outokumpu Raised to Overweight at JPMorgan; PT 6.50 euros
* Saab Raised to Overweight at Barclays; PT 740 kronor

>>> Down
* Carl Zeiss Meditec Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 22.60 euros
* Femsa ADRs Cut to Neutral at Grupo Santander; PT $130
* Gap Cut to Equal-Weight at Barclays; PT $20
* Legal & General Cut to Sell at Goldman; PT 257 pence
* Legal & General Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 280 pence
* M&G Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 330 pence
* Relais Group Cut to Accumulate at Inderes; PT 17 euros
* Royal Unibrew Cut to Hold at ABG; PT 490 kroner
* Under Armour Cut to Underweight at Barclays; PT $5
* YPF ADRs Cut to Neutral at Bradesco BBI; PT $55
* Zegna Group Cut to Underperform at BNP Paribas; PT $12.20

>>> Initiation
* Axactor Reinstated Buy at Arctic Securities; PT 6.50 kroner
* Babcock Reinstated Overweight at Barclays; PT 1,380 pence
* BAE Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 2,200 pence
* CSG NV Rated New Underweight at Barclays; PT 19 euros
* CSG NV Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 18 euros
* Hugo Boss Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT 50 euros
* Kongsberg Rated New Overweight at Barclays; PT 440 kroner
* Leonardo Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 70 euros
* RENK Group Rated New Overweight at Barclays; PT 60 euros
* Rheinmetall Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 1,600 euros
* Saab Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 600 kronor
* Schneider Electric Reinstated Buy at William O'Neil
* Thales Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 330 euros
* Valneva ADRs Rated New Buy at TD Cowen; PT $12

>>> Call
* European Defense Stocks Get Upbeat New Coverage at RBC, Barclays

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • Primary Health (PP51 TH) +7.2%
  • Alcon AG (2U3 TH) +5.2%
    • Alcon Results Beat, Implantables Remain Soft: Street Wrap
  • Saab (SDV1 TH) +2.6%
    • Saab Rated New Sector Perform at RBC; PT 600 kronor
  • Games Workshop (G7W TH) +2.2%
  • TAG Immobilien (TEG TH) +1.3%
  • RENK Group (R3NK TH) +1.2%
  • Siemens Energy (ENR TH) +1.2%
  • Prysmian (AEU TH) +1%
    • Prysmian’s Atkore Deal Broadens US Electrical, Data-Center Mix
  • Freenet (FNTN TH) +0.9%
  • Schneider Electric (SND TH) +0.9%
  • Qiagen (QIA TH) -1.4%

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • Siemens Energy (ENR TH) +1.2%
    • Global Gas Turbine Orders Soar to Record Quarter, JPMorgan Says
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) +0.7%
    • Rheinmetall Rated New Outperform at RBC; PT 1,600 euros
  • Qiagen (QIA TH) -1.5%
MDAX:
  • TAG Immobilien (TEG TH) +3.7%
    • TAG Immobilien Sees FY FFO I at Upper End of Guidance Range
  • RENK Group (R3NK TH) +1.2%
    • RENK Group Rated New Overweight at Barclays; PT 60 euros
  • SUSS MicroTec (SMHN TH) +1.2%
  • Deutz (DEZ TH) +1%
  • Freenet (FNTN TH) +1%
SDAX:
  • Patrizia (PAT TH) +3.4%
    • Patrizia 1H Operating Income EU26.5M Vs. EU15.2M Y/y
  • Norma (NOEJ TH) +2.1%
    • Norma 2Q Adjusted Ebit EU7.6M
  • Cancom (COK TH) +1.7%
  • Jungheinrich (JUN3 TH) +1.2%
    • Jungheinrich 2Q Ebit Beats Estimates
  • Carl Zeiss Meditec (AFX TH) -4.5%
    • Carl Zeiss Meditec Cut to Sell at UBS; PT 22.60 euros
  • PNE AG (PNE3 TH) -9.1%
    • PNE Gets Takeover Interest Indicated Below Market Share Value

TechTimes : SpaceX Reportedly Targets Israeli AI Lab Decart: $6B for Faster Infe

SpaceX Reportedly Targets Israeli AI Lab Decart: $6B for Faster Inference
Decart’s optimization stack runs AI eight times faster; would fill gap from xAI exodus

SpaceX is reportedly in advanced talks to acquire Israeli AI startup Decart at a valuation of approximately $6 billion to $7 billion — a deal that would hand Musk's company a proprietary inference-optimization stack capable of running AI models at roughly eight times the industry average speed, and establish SpaceX's first engineering foothold in Israel, according to an exclusive report by Calcalist, Israel's leading financial newspaper. The deal could be signed within a week. If completed, it would be SpaceX's second major AI acquisition since its $75 billion IPO in June, following the $60 billion Cursor all-stock deal announced just weeks after the company went public.

Three-year-old Decart originally entered advanced negotiations with Nvidia — which had invested in the company's most recent funding round — before a larger competing bid caused the founders to pivot to a new buyer, according to Calcalist's exclusive reporting. Multiple sources cited by Calcalist believe SpaceX is now the leading candidate, though Amazon and Dutch-based cloud company Nebius are also believed to be in the picture. Decart declined to comment.

What Is Decart, and Why Do Three Tech Giants Want It
Decart is one of a handful of companies worldwide that has made real-time generative AI video commercially viable at scale, according to Radical Ventures' investment case, from the firm that led the company's most recent funding round. Founded in September 2023 by Dean Leitersdorf, 27, and Moshe Shalev, 38 — both veterans of Israel's elite signals intelligence unit, Unit 8200 — the company has raised approximately $450 million across a rapid series of rounds that reflect the intensity of investor interest in its underlying technology.

The company's calling card arrived in October 2024, when it released Oasis: a demo showing that an AI model could generate a fully interactive, Minecraft-style virtual environment at 20 frames per second, with no two players experiencing the same world. Oasis drew one million users in days and briefly surpassed ChatGPT in downloads. Elon Musk, who tried the platform shortly after launch, posted a single word on X: "wow." Musk and Leitersdorf have stayed in regular contact since then, according to Calcalist. A personal bridge also runs through Shaun Maguire — the Sequoia Capital partner who has backed Decart since its seed round and organized Musk's 2023 post-October 7 visit to Israel, during which Musk toured the Gaza border area.

The Oasis demo attracted attention as a remarkable demonstration of generative technology, but what was genuinely new was the economics underneath it. Decart was not just generating virtual worlds — it was generating them at a cost low enough that the technology could be deployed commercially rather than confined to research demonstrations. The company does not want to be a gaming company; its technology was always aimed at something larger, as the founders have described in interviews.

The Technical Case: What DOS Actually Does
The engine behind every Decart product is a piece of infrastructure called DOS — the Decart Optimization Stack — and it is the primary reason three major technology companies are competing to acquire a startup with "several tens of millions of dollars" in annual revenue and fewer than 100 employees.

DOS is a vertically integrated platform that operates at a lower level of the hardware stack than most AI software companies ever touch. It spans hardware-aware model design, custom kernel tooling, proprietary compilers, and inference optimization — effectively rewriting how an AI model talks to a chip, rather than accepting whatever efficiency the chip provides by default. The result, according to Radical Ventures' Series B announcement: DOS delivers over 1,600 tokens per second for agentic AI inference, compared to an industry average of roughly 200 — approximately eight times faster. On Amazon's Trainium chips specifically, Decart's systems achieve over 80% Model FLOPS Utilization — meaning more than 80% of the chip's raw computing capacity is doing actual productive work, compared to an industry norm closer to 40 to 50%.

What makes DOS commercially unusual is that it is hardware-agnostic: it runs across Nvidia GPUs, Amazon's Trainium accelerators, and Google TPUs, integrating into a customer's existing infrastructure rather than requiring a switch to a specific vendor's hardware, per Radical Ventures' investment thesis. This is the specific reason both chip manufacturers and cloud companies have been paying Decart for access to the technology — and why Nvidia's own acquisition negotiations ended not because the deal fell apart over valuation, but because a higher competing offer arrived.

Built on top of DOS are two product lines. Lucy is Decart's real-time video world model: it transforms live video feeds — from a camera, a screen, or a game — responding to user inputs in under 30 milliseconds and running at 1080p at 30 frames per second. Applications include virtual clothing try-on, dynamic advertising, live streaming, and gaming. Oasis is Decart's world model for physical AI: it generates physically accurate, real-time simulations for robotics and autonomous vehicle training, targeting scenarios that traditional physics-engine tools like CARLA and Isaac Sim cannot produce at scale because those tools require hand-built environments, according to Decart's product documentation. Together, the two product lines — and the DOS stack powering both — make the case that Decart has built not a product but an infrastructure layer: the piece that makes real-time generative AI economically viable at deployment scale.

Chris Penrose, Global Vice President for Telecom at Nvidia, described the significance in a March 2026 collaboration announcement: running Decart's Lucy model on Nvidia's distributed edge computing infrastructure enabled interactive AI applications at global scale with near-instant response times.

Musk's AI Empire and the Gap DOS Would Fill
To understand why SpaceX would acquire a company with modest current revenues at a $6 to $7 billion price tag, it helps to understand the state of SpaceX's AI division after a turbulent 18 months.

SpaceX acquired Musk's AI startup xAI in February 2026 at a valuation of $250 billion for the AI unit, merging under one roof the Grok large language model and the Colossus supercomputer cluster in Memphis. Within weeks of the acquisition, the cultural friction between xAI's research-oriented founding team and SpaceX's hardware-execution culture became visible. All 11 original xAI co-founders departed between February and March 2026 — an attrition rate described by analysts as virtually unprecedented at this scale for a technology company post-acquisition. Musk publicly acknowledged the outcome: "xAI was not built right first time around," he wrote, "so is being rebuilt from the foundations up."

Cursor, acquired in June 2026, represents one layer of that rebuild — developer tools and coding assistance. Decart, if the deal closes, would represent a different and more foundational layer: the optimization infrastructure that determines how efficiently SpaceX's entire AI compute estate runs.

SpaceX's financial disclosures make the logic concrete. In the second quarter of 2026, the company reported $14.1 billion in contracted AI cloud sales — agreements with Alphabet and Anthropic under which SpaceX's compute infrastructure serves as an AI cloud provider. Musk told investors that a $100 billion annualized revenue run rate by December is "not a question mark," according to CNBC's reporting on SpaceX's earnings call. Reaching that target requires that SpaceX's hardware — including the Colossus supercomputer and any future compute expansion — runs as efficiently as possible. DOS is specifically the software that closes that gap.

Calcalist notes that Decart's technology "could help SpaceX generate more computing output from the same physical resources" — an insight that translates directly into margin: more AI revenue per GPU purchased.

What the Integration Risk Looks Like
The xAI co-founder exodus is not only a piece of context — it is the most important precedent for evaluating what a Decart acquisition by SpaceX would actually mean for the company and its founders.

Leitersdorf has spoken in consistent and specific terms about ambitions that exceed any conventional acquisition outcome. In a Calcalist interview about his ambitions, he described his goal as building something comparable to Google, Apple, or Facebook in AI — a company that changes what the world looks like before and after. Shalev described their shared goal at founding: to solve "a huge challenge because we lived in a time that was bigger than us," according to Calcalist's reporting. These are the stated ambitions of founders who have said it would take five years to build something world-changing — at a company that is barely three years old.

A sale to SpaceX, or to Amazon, or to Nebius, resolves the financial question immediately but leaves open whether Decart's founders will thrive inside a larger organization where the engineering culture, execution tempo, and strategic priorities have been set by other hands. The xAI precedent — where eleven accomplished AI researchers departed within weeks of acquisition by SpaceX — is not a prediction of the same outcome for Decart's founders. But it is the most recent data point on what happens when a research-oriented AI lab encounters SpaceX's operating model, and a new acquirer would need to structure the deal differently to avoid repeating it.

Calcalist notes the significance directly: a deal with Musk, unlike a deal with a chipmaker or cloud company that already has an Israeli presence, "could potentially give Decart a different role in the global technology landscape" and bring a major new technology company into Israel. If SpaceX is the buyer, it would establish an R&D center in Tel Aviv — its first engineering footprint in Israel — using Decart as the foundation.

Two Founders From Opposite Worlds
Behind the technical platform are two founders with strikingly different origins who, by Shalev's account, complement each other precisely because of the gap between them.

Leitersdorf is a product of academic acceleration and a prominent Israeli financial family — his brother Yoav founded YL Ventures, a cybersecurity-focused venture capital firm. Leitersdorf began his computer science undergraduate degree at 17, completed his master's shortly after, and earned his doctorate from the Technion at 23, the youngest PhD graduate the institution had recorded until his younger brother Orian surpassed him. His dissertation earned the prestigious ACM PODC Dissertation Award and produced a postdoctoral fellowship offer at the National University of Singapore, which he declined to found Decart instead.

Shalev's path was structurally opposite. Raised in an ultra-Orthodox household in Bnei Brak, he pursued a bachelor's degree in accounting through evening classes while working to support his family, having married young and become a father of two children. At 23, he enlisted in the IDF through a program specifically designed to integrate Haredi men into technical military units. He served in Unit 8200 for 13 years, eventually becoming the right-hand aide to then-unit commander Yossi Sariel, before meeting Leitersdorf by chance at the base in the week after Operation Guardian of the Walls in 2021. Their first conversation, they have said, centered on a "classified technological issue."

They registered Decart as a company on September 7, 2023. Exactly one month later, both were called up for extended reserve duty following the October 7 attacks.

The company recently added Sariel himself to its management. Sariel resigned command of Unit 8200 in December 2024, accepting responsibility for what he described as a "profound intelligence failure" — acknowledging that despite information about Hamas's plans, the unit could not break through its analytical assumptions. He has since joined Decart's leadership while also founding a separate AI company, Alma Labs, which is pursuing Israeli government contracts. His presence at Decart adds a direct connection to Israel's national security infrastructure — a factor any acquirer's due diligence team will weigh.

The Other Bidders
Amazon is named as a potential buyer, though Calcalist notes the company has historically avoided very large acquisition prices. Its most notable recent deal — an $11 billion April 2026 Globalstar acquisition deal — targeted a business generating roughly $250 million in annual revenue. Decart's revenue is described as "several tens of millions of dollars," with uneven growth driven largely by custom engagements with chip manufacturers. At the reported acquisition price, any buyer is primarily paying for the technology and the team, not for current cash flows.

Amazon's interest has a specific technical logic: Decart's DOS stack delivers its most dramatic efficiency gains on Amazon Trainium chips specifically — over 80% Model FLOPS Utilization versus typical production rates — and Amazon has been a strategic API customer since Decart's May 2026 funding round. If Amazon acquires Decart, it secures both the inference optimization advantage for its own AI cloud and prevents a competitor from gaining it.

Nebius — the Amsterdam-headquartered, Nasdaq-listed AI cloud company — is the third named candidate. Nebius has been actively building Israeli infrastructure in 2026: it was selected by the Israel Innovation Authority to build and operate the country's national AI supercomputer, signed an $880 million Mega Or data center agreement for facilities in Israel, and has been acquiring Israeli AI startups, including a reported $275 million deal to buy Tavily in February 2026. An acquisition of Decart would accelerate Nebius's position in Israel while adding world-model inference capability to a company already operating specialized AI cloud infrastructure for major hyperscalers.

Funding History: From $21M Seed to a $6B Exit in Three Years
Decart's fundraising history reflects an unusually rapid compression of the venture-capital cycle for a company building deep technical infrastructure. The $21 million seed round — led by Sequoia Capital with investor Oren Zeev — was already notable for its size at emergence from stealth in October 2024. One month later, Benchmark, one of the most selective American venture capital firms and one that had barely operated in Israel until then, led a $25 million extension at a roughly $500 million valuation.

Less than a year after that, a $100 million round pushed the total to $153 million at a $3.1 billion valuation. In May 2026, Radical Ventures' May 2026 funding round valued the company at approximately $4 billion, with Nvidia and eBay Ventures, Adobe Ventures, and Toyota Ventures also participating. Private investors in that round included OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy and former Disney CEO Michael Eisner.

A sale at $6 billion to $7 billion would represent a roughly 50% to 75% premium to that May valuation in approximately three months — and would be among the largest exits in Israeli technology history, for a company that is just three years old and employs fewer than 100 people.

FT : Luxury fashion’s existential crisis Pastiche has become fashion’s main mode

Luxury fashion’s existential crisis
Pastiche has become fashion’s main mode of creation and the industry — stuck in a rut — has run out of things to copy

I have been an avid fashion fan since 1998, when a fateful visit to Barneys, New York’s famed department store, changed my life. Discovering forward-thinking designers such as Ann Demeulemeester and Raf Simons, Comme des Garçons and Yohji Yamamoto was a transcendental experience. Until then, my fashion consumption was textbook Veblenian — like many aspirational consumers, I thought fashion existed solely to signal one’s monetary status. Now I was confronted with and confounded by the notion that it could also be a deeply creative discipline. The rabbit hole was so alluring that I gave up a career on Wall Street and became a fashion writer.

The end of the 20th century was a pivotal time, when the countercultural mood of the 1990s began to capitulate to poptimism — a mentality that championed mass taste while denigrating the avant-garde. This included fashion. Watching trailblazing, independent designers like Helmut Lang, Jil Sander and Martin Margiela sell their brands in the hope of competing with rising conglomerates such as LVMH and Kering, while promising talents like Veronique Branquinho and AF Vandevorst gradually diminished and eventually closed shop, was dispiriting. The 2010 suicide of Alexander McQueen provided an awful coda to that period. Since then, the aesthetic innovation that characterised fashion has gradually given way to the carefully managed regurgitation of stale ideas. The spirit of auteurship feels overshadowed by the power of the corporate brand.

I have spent a lot of time thinking about why fashion today feels more important than ever, yet creatively enervated. My mind keeps returning to postmodernism and its key characteristics: erasure of the high-low cultural divide, enthusiastic embrace of pop, insistence on pure subjectivity of taste, devaluation of originality, diminishing of critical authority and championing of commerce. 

A year after McQueen took his own life, a new creator was setting the tone in fashion: Virgil Abloh. A Chicago native and creative director for the rapper Kanye West, Abloh found early success with a graphic hoodie that featured a reproduction of Caravaggio’s painting The Entombment of Christ on the front, and “PYREX23” — an amalgamation of the name of cookware favoured by illicit drug producers and Michael Jordan’s jersey number — on the back. It was pure pastiche, and Abloh was an emblematic product of postmodernism.

The output of his popular label Off-White, launched in 2013 with the backing of savvy Italian businessmen, mostly consisted of banal spins on existing clothing archetypes, such as putting words in quotes on garments, like “little black dress” on a little black dress, or “sculpture” on a handbag. Abloh made no secret of his intentions; in a guest lecture at Harvard Graduate School of Design, he said he was only interested in changing an already existing design by 3 per cent as part of his creative process.

The rise of Abloh and designers like him was inevitable; by the 2010s the cultural and commercial forces of postmodernism that brought him to the top had become dogma. Poptimism, pastiche, the dismantling of the cultural hierarchy in the name of “democratisation” and the diminishing of the critical apparatus that counterbalanced marketing-driven narratives provided ample soil for mediocrity. And fashion, by this time thoroughly dominated by the LVMH/Kering duopoly, was there, ready to please its new mass audience. In 2018, Abloh was appointed the artistic director of Louis Vuitton menswear. He died of cancer in 2021.

In the past 15 years, innovation in fashion has all but died, replaced by a continuous recombination of past styles — copies of copies of copies. For a time, this worked well for big brands, which catered to a new type of mass luxury consumer. This global cohort of the newly minted rich and the attendant aspirational class desired to project an image of material success and upward mobility. It wanted to be seen as stylish but was terrified of standing out. The luxury fashion industry responded by pumping out T-shirts, hoodies and sneakers whose only differentiator was the logo, which doubled as the official stamp of fashionability. Conformity was back with a vengeance with a postmodernist alibi: what’s popular is good, high culture is undemocratic, critics are snobs.

Now, the luxury fashion industry looks creatively listless and rudderless, latching on to other cultural disciplines to superimpose meaning on to clothes that in themselves have none. The lack of direction is compounded by the fact that postmodern culture has no sense of historicity: a feeling of continuity with the past that can either set a forward course or provide ground for subversion. Following Picasso, McQueen said that you need to know the rules to break them. In a culture where there are no rules, there is nothing to break. Increasingly, it feels as if there is nothing to create either. 

Postmodernity is characterised by fragmentation of knowledge, which is evident in the piecemeal way information is consumed today through TikTok videos, making it nearly impossible to reconstruct a sense of historical continuity. What’s more, this lack of historicity is attended by a despairing view of the future, and so our culture, including fashion, inevitably returns to the past. Unable to connect with it on any meaningful level, it only mines it as retro, as a series of aesthetic cues without substance to be remixed at will. At a recent panel where I was judging the work of young designers, a brand whose clothes looked like a random blend of rebellion signifiers presented itself as “subcultural”. When I asked the two young designers what subculture meant to them, they had no answer.

The philosopher Fredric Jameson, who examined the pernicious effect of postmodernism in his 1991 book Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, wrote, “From the postmodern side of the divide . . . the ‘end of history’ here simply means that anything goes.” To translate this into fashion business terms, “anything goes” means anything sells. Indeed, this is what it feels like when $1,150 cotton T-shirts and $750 flip-flops pass for high-end fashion. If we are at the end of fashion history, it is truly a dispiriting one.

Is there a way out of this malaise? It seems the current luxury fashion downturn is sending a strong signal that the industry has alienated a lot of people. You can see this in the virtual demise of Off-White, whose assets were unloaded by LVMH in 2024, and in the lukewarm reception of Demna’s Gucci, whose postmodern irony worked at Balenciaga just five years ago.

The young in particular — having realised that they missed out on the golden age of creativity — often prefer to buy second-hand. But shopping is not enough. If we want to improve fashion, we must create a new ecosystem, one that returns to the idea that pushing aesthetic boundaries is the only way forward. It will be hard, but postmodernism has made us forget something else: creativity is not supposed to be easy.