FT : Telegram finances propped up by crypto gains as founder fights charges

Telegram finances propped up by crypto gains as founder fights charges

Revenue leapt to $525mn in first half of 2024 before chief Pavel Durov was detained over alleged criminality on platform

Telegram has told investors that the detainment of chief executive Pavel Durov by French police has had no “material impact” on the messaging app’s operations, as financial disclosures showed that the surging value of its crypto holdings is increasingly underpinning its business.

According to unaudited financial statements seen by the Financial Times, which have not been previously reported, Telegram reported huge gains in the value of its digital assets in the first half of 2024, which rose to $1.3bn compared with nearly $400mn at the end of last year.

The filings suggest that this rise, together with proceeds it booked from selling Toncoins — a cryptocurrency with which it has close ties — and a further Toncoin-related deal have all helped create a financial buffer for the Dubai-based company after it was shaken by Durov’s legal troubles.

Telegram was rocked in August when its founder was detained by French authorities in Paris. He faces a number of preliminary charges over Telegram’s alleged failure to address alleged criminality on the platform. One of the charges is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and Durov remains on bail in the country. 

The company wrote in the disclosures to investors, which are dated October 22, that the matter “did not have a material impact on Telegram operations and the group’s business activities”, noting that the allegations were targeting its founder rather than the company itself. 

Telegram declined to comment on the disclosures.

According to its financial statements, Telegram made $525mn in revenue in the six months to the end of June, up 190 per cent from the same period in 2023.

Nearly half of the revenue — or $225mn — came from a one-time deal with an unnamed party, according to the documents. Under the terms of the deal, Telegram “received remuneration” in exchange for allowing the cryptocurrency Toncoin to be the exclusive method for small businesses to buy advertising on the app. The exclusivity agreement was terminated on October 1, the documents said.

Toncoin was originally developed in-house at Telegram. However, it is now developed by an open-source community after the project ran into regulatory troubles with the US Securities and Exchange Commission in 2020.

An ecosystem of groups now build on the Ton blockchain or invest in Ton-related ventures, some of which have close ties to Telegram and Durov.

Telegram said in the disclosures that it “holds a significant quantity of Toncoins and is exposed to changes in Toncoin market value”, acknowledging that here had been volatility in the price since Durov’s detainment. Toncoin is trading about 10 per cent lower since Durov was detained.

The company made $353mn in proceeds from the sale of digital assets in the first half of the year to June, and has sold $348mn in Toncoin since then.

It also posted a post-tax profit of $335mn in the first half of this year. The figures dwarf the $342mn in revenues that it booked for the full year of 2023 on losses of $173mn, in a sign that Telegram was on the path to its first annual profit prior to Durov’s detainment.

Experts have warned that Telegram, which is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, could struggle to bring in future advertising revenues given it is now linked to alleged child sexual abuse material and terrorist content.

The company said in the disclosures that it “stands behind its practices in content moderation and co-operation with judicial authorities in strict compliance with the applicable French laws”, but also said it was upgrading its content review practices and expanding its moderation team. 

Telegram is fully owned by Durov, who sits on a multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency fortune, but the company has raised about $2.4bn in debt financing set to mature in 2026. According to the documents, in September 2024 Telegram used a part of its overall proceeds to buy back some of its own bonds for $124.5mn.

While Telegrams bonds are still trading below face value, they have recovered from their initial sell-of following Durov’s detainment, quoted at 95 cents on the dollar, having plunged as low 87 cents in August.

Speaking to the Financial Times earlier this year, Durov said Telegram, which only has about 50 employees, was increasing its monetisation efforts through ads and subscriptions. This follows the typical business model of rival social media and messaging platforms such as Meta and X, with the founder suggesting the company could float in 2026.

Advertising revenue roughly doubled to a record $120mn in the first half of the year while premium subscriptions brought in $119mn, compared with $32mn in the same period last year, according to Telegram’s financial disclosures.

One person familiar with the matter said that the company had taken advantage of favourable market conditions to profitably divest some of its cryptocurrency reserves.

However, the person said that this was tactical and not part of its longer-term monetisation strategy, which remained selling ads and premium subscriptions.

>>> US After Hours Summary: SMTC +13.4%, WWD +11.4% up big on earnings; LESL -19

After Hours Summary: SMTC +13.4%, WWD +11.4% up big on earnings; LESL -19.1%, A -1.3%, ZM -1.1% heading lower on quarterly numbers

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: SMTC +13.4%, WWD +11.4%, CENT +1.1%, FLNC +0.9%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: RUM +4% (announces Bitcoin treasury strategy), DAN +2.8% (appoints new CEO, to sell highway business, reiterates FY24 guidance), GEV +0.9% (secures contract from Powerlink to supply equipment in Australia), AOSL +0.6% (dismisses public accounting firm; appoints new firm), MREO +0.6% (stock offering), VSTO +0.3% (shareholders approve CSG transaction)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: LESL -19.1%, BLBD -4.8%, ENTA -2.3%, A -1.3%, ZM -1.1% (also increases repurchase plan)

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: ALEC -30.8% (AL002 INVOKE-2 Phase 2 trial results), ATRO -14.8% ($150 mln convertible senior notes offering), KSS -4.7% (CEO to step down; appoints new CEO), MAC -2.2% (stock offering), BCYC -1% (to present data), ZBH -0.8% (FDA approval for Oxford Cementless Partial Knee), GH -0.7% (unanimous verdict that Natera engaged in false advertising), SEM -0.1% (completes spin-off of Concentra)

>>> US Close Dow +0.99% S&P +0.30% Nasdaq +0.27% Russell +1.47%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The stock market started this holiday-shortened week on an upbeat note, responding favorably to President-elect Trump's nomination of Scott Bessent for Treasury Secretary. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (+1.0%), Russell 2000 (+1.5%), and S&P Mid Cap 400 (+1.5%) logged decent gains while the S&P 500 (+0.3%) and Nasdaq Composite (+0.3%) trailed their peers.

The relative underperformance of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite reflected some rotation out of influential names that are sitting on huge gains since the start of the year. NVIDIA (NVDA 136.02, -5.93, -4.2%), which is still 174.7% higher this year, and Tesla (TSLA 338.59, -13.97, -4.0%), which is up 36.3% in 2024, were among the key players in that regard.

Mr. Trump's pick to lead the Department of the Treasury is perceived as "market-friendly" due to his background as a hedge fund manager, which fueled the overall upside bias in the equity market. According to The Wall Street Journal, Bessent has expressed his priority to advance the Trump administration tax-cut proposals.
The bond market also rallied due to optimism that Mr. Bessent, while focusing on tax cuts, will also focus on reducing the national debt, cutting the budget deficit to 3% of GDP, and advocating for a more gradual approach to tariffs in order to prevent runaway inflation.

The 10-yr yield dropped 15 basis points to 4.27% and the 2-yr yield dropped ten basis points to 4.27%. Also, the U.S. Treasury kicked off this week's note auction slate with a stellar $69 billion 2-yr note offering.

The everything rally in the stock market left nine of the S&P 500 sectors higher led by real estate (+1.3%), which reacted to the drop in rates. The consumer discretionary sector was the next best performer, gaining 1.0%.

The energy sector was the weakest performer, dropped 2.0% as oil prices slid following news that Israel and Hezbollah could be nearing a ceasefire agreement. WTI crude futures settled 3.3% lower at $68.93/bbl.
There was no US economic data of note.
  • Nasdaq Composite: +26.9%
  • S&P 500: +25.5%
  • S&P Midcap 400: +21.9%
  • Russell 2000: +20.5%
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +18.7%

Looking ahead, Tuesday's economic calendar features:
  • 9:00 ET: September FHFA Housing Price Index (prior 0.3%) and September S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index (Briefing.com consensus 4.7%; prior 5.2%)
  • 10:00 ET: November Consumer Confidence (consensus 113.0; prior 108.7) and October New Home Sales (consensus 718,000; prior 738,000)

FT : Starbucks has been outclassed by local rivals in China

Starbucks has been outclassed by local rivals in China
Coffee giant would benefit from a helping hand from a local partner

Starbucks’ determination to capture the attention of the Chinese consumer extended to offering a pork-flavoured latte in the country earlier this year. The limited edition drink is made of espresso, steamed milk and Dongpo braised pork flavour sauce topped with extra sauce and pork meat as garnish. Such product “innovation”, however, hasn’t cut it: operating in the country is no easy task, particularly given fierce local competition.

Starbucks had almost 7,600 outlets in China as of late September and the country accounts for about a fifth of the group’s global total. It is still expanding in China, increasing the number of its stores by more than a tenth in the latest financial year. Starbucks had a 14 per cent market share of China’s café market in 2022, according to the most recent available data.

That makes it an attractive target for Chinese groups, including domestic coffee chains. Starbucks, which is reported to be exploring options for its Chinese operations — including the possibility of selling a stake in the business — would also benefit from a helping hand from a local partner.

The buyer, if not already in the coffee chain business, would have to be prepared to deal with extreme competition, which is now hotter than ever thanks to two local rivals: Luckin Coffee and Cotti. These Chinese rivals are a step ahead in terms of local trends, including automation — and offer much cheaper coffee too.

The pace of growth of domestic coffee chains has been impressive in the past year. Luckin’s performance has been especially strong. It has proved sceptics, who once saw its ultra-cheap coffee prices and high costs as a flawed business model, wrong this year. Luckin Coffee’s operating margin hit 15.3 per cent in the latest quarter as net revenues rose more than 40 per cent to $1.5bn, adding to annual sales that nearly doubled last year. It opened 1,400 new stores in the latest quarter, bringing its total to 21,300. Meanwhile, signs of the pressure are showing with same-store sales at Starbucks down 14 per cent in China last quarter.



Automation, a rapidly growing trend in the local coffee chain industry, is helping margins during a time when costs are rising, especially delivery, sales and marketing expenses. Cotti, which has grown rapidly since it was founded in 2022, is pushing out coffee-making robots. Luckin has fully automated pour-over coffee machines. Luckin’s coffee robots and unmanned coffee shops were key to maintaining growth during the pandemic.

Valued at an industry multiple, the Chinese operations of Starbucks could be worth about $12bn. Like the different drinks on the menu, each market increasingly requires distinct strategies to stay ahead of the competition.

FT : The reunion of BP and Transocean is sending a signal to the oil market

The reunion of BP and Transocean is sending a signal to the oil market
Tight market for oil rigs might restrain supply even if producers pull back from projects

There is a feeling of déjà vu about BP’s big new oil project. Not just because the company is returning to the Gulf of Mexico, 15 years after the Deepwater Horizon accident killed 11 people, spilled 5mn barrels of oil and cost the company more than $60bn. 

It is also because it is drilling its new Kaskida field, where oil sits about six miles below the surface of the sea at an incredibly high pressure, with the same company that owned Deepwater Horizon: Transocean.

This time around, the drillship is called the Deepwater Atlas. Before you raise your eyebrows at the reunion, BP had little choice; Transocean was the only company with an available drillship capable of handling the high pressure of the oil reservoir.

Indeed BP was forced to pay a high price, roughly $635,000 a day, to secure the Deepwater Atlas, since Transocean’s fleet is almost fully booked. Its chief executive said last month that its rigs are 97 per cent booked for next year and 86 per cent for the first half of 2026. He boasted that the company had a backlog of work worth $9.3bn. 

Since the start of 2022, the average day rate for floating oil rigs has risen by more than 40 per cent according to analysts tracking the industry at Rystad, an energy consultancy. Since renting a rig accounts for between 20 per cent and 40 per cent of the cost of developing an oilfield, the rise in prices, combined with rig availability, has implications for how much oil is going to come on to the market over the next few years.

The number of future rig contracts is already falling as companies, fretting over a possible oversupply of oil, exercise restraint in starting new projects. The worries have seen the share prices of some leading rig operators fall nearly 30 per cent in the last year, despite the current boom.

The story of the Deepwater Atlas illustrates the boom and bust of the market. The ship was commissioned from a yard in Singapore in 2014, back when the price of oil was more than $115 a barrel and companies were falling over themselves to find and develop more offshore oil. But almost as soon as work started on the $1bn vessel, the oil market collapsed as Saudi Arabia fought a price war against oil from the US shale patch and Russia.


Contractors quickly learnt how vicious the cycle can be; plenty of oil companies simply walked away from their contracts. How much oil the world would need in the future was increasingly unclear as oil companies diverted some spending to low-carbon projects and the Covid-19 pandemic hit demand and introduced the idea that gas-guzzling commuters might prefer to work from home. Transocean put the Deepwater Atlas deal on ice for years, only taking delivery in 2022.

The supply-demand balance now looks better for the oil rig companies. There has been significant consolidation in the offshore supply chain, plenty of older rigs have been scrapped and few companies are brave enough to place new orders.

And offshore oil is back, particularly in the US, Brazil and Guyana, but also in Africa and Asia. This year, oil companies will spend more than $100bn on offshore projects, rising to nearly $140bn in 2027, according to Rystad. With more deepwater oil being extracted, some analysts are now even expecting a glut of oil to hit the market in the next few years. By the end of the decade, the International Energy Agency thinks there may be as much as 8mn barrels a day of spare capacity, an amount never seen outside of the Covid pandemic.

Much depends on how quickly the demand for oil fades, especially in China, where consumers are switching rapidly to electric cars. But the tightness of the rig market may also point to constraints on supply. Offshore projects take years to develop and often over a decade to break even. If oil prices wane, they get put on ice while oil companies focus on cheaper and easier prospects.

Since April, despite wars in Europe and the Middle East, the price of crude has fallen more than 15 per cent, as traders fret over the Chinese economy. Rystad believes that three-quarters of the offshore projects looked at by oil majors will be approved at a $60 price for crude. Rig owners are also bullish. Transocean says some of its customers have boasted they can make a 20 per cent return even at $40 oil. 

But for rig operators to invest in new capacity, and to brave their shareholders’ reticence about capital spending, it will take several years of stable oil prices, as well as an expectation that the world’s oil needs can only be met from offshore drilling. That still looks like a tough call at the moment.

FT : UK air taxi company Vertical Aerospace wins $50mn lifeline from creditor

UK air taxi company Vertical Aerospace wins $50mn lifeline from creditor
Founder loses control to US distressed debt investor Mudrick Capital with debt to equity swap

UK entrepreneur Stephen Fitzpatrick will cede control of Vertical Aerospace, the air taxi start-up he founded, as part of a rescue deal with its largest creditor, ending a protracted fight for the future of the company.

Vertical said on Monday it had secured up to $50mn in new funding from Mudrick Capital, a US distressed debt investor, staving off a cash crunch at the Bristol-based company, which employs about 300 people.

As part of the agreement, about $130mn of loans from Mudrick Capital — half of the outstanding amount — will be converted into equity at $2.75 a share, reducing Vertical’s debt. The repayment date for the balance will be extended to December 2028.

The deal will make Mudrick Capital, founded by Jason Mudrick in 2009, the largest shareholder in Vertical with a stake of just over 70 per cent. Fitzpatrick’s stake will fall from 70 to around 20 per cent and he will remain on the board as a non-executive director. Vertical will continue to operate from the UK. 

Stuart Simpson, chief executive of Vertical, said the deal, which has been under discussion for months, would strengthen Vertical’s balance sheet and pave the way for a fresh fundraising round.

As part of the commitment, Mudrick will invest $25mn upfront and backstop another $25mn that will be reduced by any amounts raised from third parties. Fitzpatrick reserves the option to invest a further $25mn. 

Simpson said the most important part of the agreement was “deleveraging the balance sheet”, adding that the convertible loan notes had been an “impediment to raising equity”.

The future of Vertical, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has been in the balance for months as its cash reserves dwindled to $60mn at the end of September. Its shares closed at $4.79 on Friday.

Simpson said the new funding would give Vertical enough “runway through to the end of 2025”.

Mudrick said the agreement “underscores our appreciation of Vertical Aerospace’s position in the [electric vertical take-off and landing] sector”. 

Fitzpatrick, who is best known in the UK for founding Ovo Energy, welcomed the deal. He set up Vertical in 2015 after becoming convinced of the merits of air taxis while stuck in a traffic jam in São Paulo. 

The company is one of a number of flying-taxi companies that went public as special purpose vehicles in 2021, attracting billions of dollars of investment. Most, however, have struggled with high development costs and regulatory approval. German start-up Lilium, which was also listed on the NYSE, filed for insolvency this month. 

Vertical has been testing its VX4 vehicle, which will have a range of up to 100 miles, a cruise speed of 150mph and capacity for four passengers. Simpson said the company was committed to bringing its air taxi to market in 2028, describing the timeline as “realistic”.