>>> US Close Dow +0.14% S&P +0.42% Nasdaq +0.57% Russell +1.32%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The stock market was back on a winning track today after modest declines yesterday, which broke an eight-session winning streak for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite. The Russell 2000 outperformed its peers, rising 1.3%. The S&P 500 logged a 0.4% gain and the Nasdaq Composite settled 0.6% higher.

Volume was below-average at the NYSE again today, reflecting an ongoing lack of conviction. Still, advancers had a 3-to-1 lead over decliners at the NYSE and a 5-to-2 lead at the Nasdaq.

Today's release of revisions to nonfarm payrolls for the April 2023-March 2024 period, which ultimately garnered a muted response from equities, showed that there were 818,000 fewer nonfarm payroll positions than previously thought, creating some concern that the labor market has been softening for a longer period than previously thought.

The stock and bond markets also had muted reactions to today's $16 billion 20-yr bond auction, which met good demand, and the release of the minutes from the July 30-31 FOMC meeting. The minutes were highlighted by the Fed's comments that a rate cut was "plausible" at the meeting, suggesting a September cut was all but guaranteed.

The 10-yr note yield settled four basis points lower at 3.78% and the 2-yr note yield declined seven basis points to 3.92%.

The upside bias in the stock market was supported by shares of Target (TGT 159.25, +16.04, +11.2%), which surged after reporting earnings and raising its full-year earnings outlook has contributed to the upside bias. TJX (TJX 120.23, +6.92, +6.1%) also traded higher after reporting earnings and raising its full-year comparable sales guidance.

TGT and TJX were among the top performing stocks in the S&P 500. This price action boosted the consumer staples (+0.6%) and consumer discretionary (+1.2%) sectors.
  • Nasdaq Composite: +19.4% YTD
  • S&P 500: +17.8% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +9.7% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +8.5% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +7.1% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:
  • Weekly MBA Mortgage Applications Index -10.1%; Prior 16.8%

Thursday's economic lineup features:
  • 8:30 ET: Weekly initial (consensus 225,000; prior 227,000) and continuing (prior 1.864 million) jobless claims
  • 9:45 ET: August preliminary S&P Global US Manufacturing PMI (prior 49.6) and S&P Global US Services PMI (prior 55.0)
  • 10:00 ET: July Existing Home Sales (consensus 3.9 million; prior 3.89 million)
  • 10:30 ET: EIA Natural Gas Inventories (prior -6 bcf)

>>> Snowflake beats by $0.02, beats on revs, slightly raises FY25 product revenu

Snowflake beats by $0.02, beats on revs, slightly raises FY25 product revenue guidance, reaffirms non-GAAP operating margin guidance; Authorized the repurchase of additional $2.5 bln of common stock (135.03 +3.11)
  • Reports Q2 (Jul) earnings of $0.18 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.02 better than the FactSet Consensus of $0.16; revenues rose 28.9% year/year to $868.8 mln vs the $851.72 mln FactSet Consensus.
  • Product revenue for the quarter was $829.3 million, representing 30% year-over-year growth.
  • Net revenue retention rate was 127% as of July 31, 2024. The company now has 510 customers with trailing 12-month product revenue greater than $1 million and 736 Forbes Global 2000 customers, representing 28% and 5% year-over-year growth, respectively.
  • Remaining performance obligations were $5.2 billion, representing 48% year-over-year growth.
  • Guidance: Co sees Q3 product revenue of $850-$855 mln and non-GAAP operating margin of 3%. Slightly raises FY25 product revenue guidance to $3.356 bln from $3.30 bln, reaffirms non-GAAP operating margin guidance of 3%.
  • Stock Repurchase Program: In August 2024, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of an additional $2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock under the stock repurchase program and extended the expiration date of the stock repurchase program from March 2025 to March 2027

Le Monde : Russian Oligarch Mikhail Fridman Demands €14.5 Billion from Luxembour

Russian Oligarch Mikhail Fridman Demands €14.5 Billion from Luxembourg
Targeted by the sanctions of the European Union but cleared by the European judiciary, the head of the Alfa Group wants to recover his assets. However, the freezing of his assets remains in effect.

He is one of the 1,706 Russians affected by the fourteen packages of European sanctions imposed on Moscow since the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Mikhail Maratovich Fridman, co-shareholder of the Alfa Group and holder of a fortune estimated at at least €11.3 billion, received a favorable judgment from the European Union Court on April 10. The judges ruled that it could not be proven that he had supported the decision-makers responsible for the war in Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea.

Buoyed by this ruling, the oligarch, described by the European Council as a close associate of President Vladimir Putin, now intends to take the next step: he is demanding that the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, which validated and applied the European sanctions, return all his assets, as well as provide financial compensation for the "irreversible and catastrophic damage" caused to his business. In total, he is asking for $16 billion (€14.5 billion).

The information, revealed on August 14 by the Brussels-based site EUobserver.com, has been confirmed in Luxembourg. When questioned by Le Monde, the office of Prime Minister Luc Frieden gave a terse response: "Mr. Mikhail Fridman has initiated arbitration proceedings, and the government is currently analyzing the request and the next steps with its legal advisors."

Support for the War Against Ukraine
Assisted by a team of lawyers, including those from Omnia Strategy, the London-based firm led by Cherie Blair, wife of former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair, and in Paris by the Kiejman-Marembert law firm, the head of Alfa (banking and insurance), who is also an investor in telecommunications, energy, and water treatment, is demanding that the dispute be resolved under the rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). This body, established in 1966, aims to harmonize and unify international commercial law.

The case is certainly embarrassing for the Grand Duchy, whose gross domestic product was €79.3 billion in 2023. Mr. Fridman's advisors argue that Luxembourg violated the guarantees offered by a bilateral agreement concluded in 1989 with Moscow, which also protects his investments in several other countries: the United Kingdom—where the businessman lives in a mansion and where he created the investment fund LetterOne—Ukraine, where he was born, as well as Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.

In one of the rare interviews he has given to journalists, Mr. Fridman told Bloomberg in March 2022 that the European decision had "stunned" him. "If EU officials believe I can approach Putin and tell him to stop the war, they are wrong. The distance between him and me is like between the Earth and the cosmos," he said. In the summer of 2023, British authorities had authorized a partial unfreezing of his bank accounts for his "current expenses" (€350,000), as revealed by The New York Times.

The European Council's decision to sanction the oligarch was based on a series of findings, including the fact that Mr. Fridman and his associate, Piotr Aven, had supported the war against Ukraine. Alfa Bank and Alfa Insurance, in which the two men are co-shareholders, provided loans to arms manufacturers and insured the Russian National Guard in the occupied Ukrainian areas, as well as military bases.

No Criticism of the Kremlin Leader
Mr. Fridman argued that he had resigned from his positions in Russian companies—though without selling his shares. He also denied any involvement in a conflict that he had initially called a "tragedy," while refraining from criticizing Vladimir Putin. Although he did not attend the oligarchs' meeting called by the Russian president on the day of the Ukraine invasion, February 24, 2022, he did return to Moscow in the fall of 2023, without expressing any criticism of the Kremlin leader.

In Brussels, the European Council still considers that Mr. Fridman belongs among the individuals targeted by the sanctions. Its decision was confirmed in March. The oligarch's assets remain frozen, and lifting this freeze would require a unanimous decision by the 27 member states.

Several dozen Russians are currently attempting to be removed from the list, and European judges have ruled in some cases that being a close associate of Vladimir Putin, having played a role in the country's economy, or having family ties to a regime supporter are not sufficient reasons to justify an asset freeze.

Sometimes deemed ineffective, the sanctions remain, in reality, one of the few effective tools of common foreign policy, with the office of High Representative Josep Borrell claiming that they deprive Moscow of €400 billion in annual revenues. Russian opposition figures, including those close to Alexei Navalny, are calling for the sanctions to be accompanied by a new mechanism: they should, in their view, only be lifted if the individuals concerned publicly break with the Putin regime.

Le Monde : L’oligarque russe Mikhaïl Fridman réclame 14,5 milliards d’euros au L

L’oligarque russe Mikhaïl Fridman réclame 14,5 milliards d’euros au Luxembourg
Visé par les sanctions des Vingt-Sept mais blanchi par la justice européenne, le patron du groupe Alfa veut obtenir la restitution de ses biens. Le gel de ses avoirs a néanmoins été maintenu.

Il figure sur la liste des 1 706 Russes concernés par les quatorze paquets de sanctions européennes qui ont visé Moscou depuis le début de l’invasion de l’Ukraine en février 2022. Mikhaïl Maratovitch Fridman, coactionnaire du groupe Alfa et détenteur d’une fortune estimée à au moins 11,3 milliards d’euros, a toutefois bénéficié, le 10 avril, d’un jugement favorable du Tribunal de l’Union européenne. Les juges ont estimé qu’on ne pouvait démontrer qu’il avait soutenu les décideurs responsables de la guerre en Ukraine et de l’annexion de la Crimée.

Fort de cet arrêt, l’oligarque, présenté par le Conseil européen comme un proche du président Vladimir Poutine, entend désormais passer à l’étape suivante : il réclame du grand-duché de Luxembourg, qui a validé et appliqué les sanctions européennes, la restitution de tous ses biens, ainsi qu’une compensation financière pour le « dommage irréversible et catastrophique » subi par son activité. Soit au total 16 milliards de dollars (14,5 milliards d’euros).

Révélée le 14 août par le site bruxellois EUobserver.com, l’information est confirmée à Luxembourg. Interrogé par Le Monde, le cabinet du premier ministre, Luc Frieden, a apporté une réponse laconique : « M. Mikhaïl Fridman a entamé une procédure d’arbitrage, le gouvernement est en train d’analyser la demande et les prochaines étapes avec ses conseillers juridiques. »

Soutien à la guerre contre l’Ukraine
Assisté par une batterie de juristes, dont ceux d’Omnia Strategy, la société dirigée à Londres par Cherie Blair, l’épouse de l’ex-premier ministre travailliste, et, à Paris, par le cabinet Kiejman-Marembert, le patron d’Alfa (banque et assurances), par ailleurs investisseur dans la téléphonie, l’énergie et le traitement de l’eau, réclame que le litige soit tranché en vertu des règles de la Commission des Nations unies pour le droit commercial international (UNCITRAL). Cette instance créée en 1966 vise à l’harmonisation et à l’unification du droit commercial international.

L’affaire est évidemment embarrassante pour le grand-duché, dont le produit intérieur brut était de 79,3 milliards en 2023. Les conseillers de M. Fridman soutiennent que le Luxembourg a violé les garanties qu’offrait un accord bilatéral conclu en 1989 avec Moscou et protégeant aussi ses investissements dans une série d’autres pays : le Royaume-Uni – où l’homme d’affaires vit dans un manoir et où il a créé le fonds d’investissement LetterOne –, l’Ukraine, où il est né, ainsi que l’Allemagne, les Pays-Bas, ou bien encore l’Espagne.

Dans l’un des rares entretiens qu’il a eus avec des journalistes, M. Fridman confiait en mars 2022 à l’agence Bloomberg que la décision européenne l’avait « stupéfait ». « Si les responsables de l’UE croient que je peux approcher Poutine et lui dire d’arrêter la guerre, ils se trompent. La distance entre lui et moi, c’est comme entre la terre et le cosmos », affirmait-il. A l’été 2023, les autorités britanniques avaient autorisé un dégel partiel de ses comptes bancaires pour ses « dépenses courantes » (350 000 euros), avait révélé le New York Times.

La décision de sanctionner l’oligarque prise par le Conseil européen s’appuyait sur une série de constats dont le fait que M. Fridman et son associé, Piotr Aven, avaient apporté un soutien à la guerre contre l’Ukraine. Alfa Banque et Alfa Assurances, dont les deux hommes sont coactionnaires, fournissaient des crédits à des industriels de l’armement et assuraient la garde nationale russe dans les zones ukrainiennes occupées, ainsi que des bases militaires.

Pas de critiques contre le chef du Kremlin
M. Fridman a fait valoir qu’il avait démissionné de ses postes dans des sociétés russes – sans toutefois vendre ses participations. Il a également nié toute implication dans un conflit qu’il avait, au début, qualifié de « tragédie », tout en ne critiquant pas Vladimir Poutine. S’il n’avait pas participé à la réunion des oligarques convoquée le jour même de l’invasion de l’Ukraine, le 24 février 2022, par le président russe, il était toutefois revenu à Moscou à l’automne 2023, sans formuler de critiques contre le chef du Kremlin.

A Bruxelles, le Conseil européen estime toujours que M. Fridman a donc sa place parmi les personnalités visées par les sanctions. Sa décision a été confirmée en mars. Le gel des avoirs de l’oligarque est actuellement maintenu et sa levée supposerait une décision à l’unanimité des Vingt-Sept Etats membres.

Plusieurs dizaines de Russes tentent actuellement d’être rayés de la liste et les juges européens ont estimé, dans certains cas, qu’avoir été un proche de Vladimir Poutine, avoir joué un rôle dans l’économie du pays ou avoir un lien de parenté avec l’un des soutiens du régime n’était pas un élément suffisant pour justifier un gel des avoirs.

Parfois jugées inopérantes, les sanctions demeurent, en réalité, l’un des rares outils véritables de la politique étrangère commune, les services du haut représentant Josep Borrell assurant qu’elle prive Moscou de 400 milliards d’euros de rentrées annuelles. Les opposants russes, dont les proches d’Alexeï Navalny, demandent qu’elles soient assorties d’un nouveau mécanisme : elles devraient, selon eux, n’être levées que si les personnes concernées expriment publiquement leur rupture avec le régime de Poutine.

The Information : Nvidia’s Aggressive Sales Tactics Will Backfire, Says Rival

Nvidia’s Aggressive Sales Tactics Will Backfire, Says Rival

The Takeaway
• Tenstorrent CEO says gigantic AI data centers might not be a winning move
• Companies could get stuck with unnecessarily expensive hardware
• Nvidia’s Cuda software is a ‘swamp, not a moat’

The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating accusations by customers and rivals of Nvidia, including Advanced Micro Devices, that the artificial intelligence chip designer is behaving in an anti-competitive way, including in how it bundles its products.

One longtime rival argues that while Nvidia’s sharp edged tactics don’t appear to be illegal, they will eventually hurt its business.

“When people start complaining to you about what you’re selling them, that seems like a bad thing,” said Jim Keller, CEO of AI chip developer Tenstorrent and a former chip executive at AMD, Intel, Tesla, Broadcom and Apple.

Customers feel pressured to buy Nvidia’s networking gear in order to guarantee themselves access to the company’s vaunted AI server chips, for instance, causing resentment, he said.

“I’ve talked to many people who are seriously not happy about that, because it’s not what they wanted,” Keller said in a conference call with The Information subscribers on Tuesday. “Fundamentally, you should be in business to make the best technology…and then people love to pay for that.”

Still, he defended Nvidia’s “enviable position, which isn’t” illegal.

“They invested for 10 years before AMD even thought about” graphics-focused chips, which now power everything from automated driving software to ChatGPT, he said.

An Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement that “Nvidia wins on merit, as reflected in our benchmark results and value to customers, and customers can choose whatever solution is best for them.” An AMD spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Keller’s current company, Tenstorrent, builds chips and software for training and running AI models. In contrast with Nvidia’s graphics processing units, Tenstorrent’s chips are built with multiple small central processing units in each chip that can independently decide what data to process or deprioritize. That means they are cheaper and less power-hungry than Nvidia’s GPUs, Keller has said.

Additionally, Tenstorrent differentiates itself from other chip designers by using RISC-V, an open-sourced chip design that competes with those made by Arm and Intel. The startup also licenses its technology to companies such as LG and the Leading-Edge Semiconductor Technology Center, a Japanese government-sponsored research center.

Founded in 2016, the startup has raised more than $380 million to date, and was recently in talks with Samsung to raise at least $300 million at a $2 billion pre-investment valuation.

But Tenstorrent and its ilk face a tough battle against Nvidia. Some of Nvidia’s dominance comes from its software for writing machine learning apps, Cuda, which only works with Nvidia’s own chips—making app developers less likely to switch to alternatives.

Keller said Cuda’s permanence is far from guaranteed.

Cuda “is a swamp, not a moat,” he said, because the software has become so complicated to use.

Cuda has “lots and lots of libraries and code, and so when people say, ‘well, just run Cuda,’ it’s like, well, have you ever looked at it?” Keller said.

As a result, he said, Cuda could go the way of Unix operating systems, which were replaced by easier-to-use, open-source Linux software in the 2000s. That move contributed to the downfall of leading companies including IBM, HP, Sun Microsystems and Silicon Graphics, he said.

Already, startups like Modular have emerged to try to weaken Cuda’s grip and make it easier for developers to run and train AI models on different types of chips.

Supercomputer Race

During the subscriber call, Keller also questioned the effectiveness of some of the AI-focused data centers, also known as supercomputing clusters, that companies such as Microsoft, Meta Platforms and OpenAI are planning to launch as a way to improve the capabilities of AI.

Although he agrees with AI “scaling laws”—a belief that the more compute power and data used to train AI will lead to faster improvements—he said that gigantic, expensive data centers might not be the winning move.

Rapid improvements in AI hardware and software could soon lead to new AI models that require less computational power, leaving companies stuck with unnecessarily expensive hardware, he said.

“There could be a model published next month that takes computation [costs] down ten times,” Keller said. Decades ago, “Sun, Digital Equipment and Silicon Graphics all made small computers that were easy to use and they got bigger and bigger and more and more expensive, and then the technology shifted and [the companies] literally all went bankrupt.”

With growing skepticism about the returns AI developers will generate from their investments in developing it, he said the industry could also end up in a similar situation to the internet bubble, in which millions of miles of fiber-optic cables were left gathering dust.

“Semiconductors are cyclical,” Keller said. “Every time there's an upcycle, sooner or later, somebody builds too much capacity. And then when there's a crash, everybody says, ‘you should have seen that coming.’”

He added that “this kind of [asset] bubble, the shape is recognizable which means change will come, but the thing no one can predict is when,” he said.

The biggest developers are also likely willing to lose a lot of money in an attempt to capture as much market share as possible, which could also artificially prolong the AI bubble, he said.

“There’s already a gap between what people are paying to train models versus what they're charging [customers to use AI products]...they’re already over their skis.”

The Information : Meta’s Search for AI Clout Takes It Into New Terrain

Meta’s Search for AI Clout Takes It Into New Terrain

The Takeaway
• Meta’s Llama model trails rivals on AWS
• Company relies on cloud providers to pitch models to businesses
• Meta is in talks with Snowflake about possible deal

Meta Platforms knows how to get brands like Away and Temu to buy advertisements on Facebook and Instagram. If the company’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is to succeed at his goal of becoming a leader in artificial intelligence, though, Meta’s going to have to quickly learn a new skill: how to pitch software to big businesses.

Zuckerberg wants to turn Meta’s large language model, Llama 3, into the industry standard for AI. Initially he has relied mostly on other tech companies to handle selling the software to customers, with mixed results so far.

Llama has struggled to gain traction on Amazon Web Services, the No. 1 cloud provider, which offers a variety of LLMs to businesses. Anthropic’s Claude is the most popular model on the platform, according to a person with knowledge of the situation. Salespeople at Microsoft, meanwhile, typically pitch Llama only to customers with existing data expertise, such as companies with their own in-house engineers and data scientists, according to a Microsoft employee.

Those factors could put pressure on Meta to figure out how to build its own enterprise sales and marketing team to pitch its products directly to business, something it has shown little stomach for in the past. For a time it pitched its Workplace communications platform to businesses through a dedicated sales team, but Meta didn’t consider Workplace a business priority and this year said it would shut the platform down.

A Meta spokesperson said the company had worked with a large number of partners for the launch of Llama 3.1 in July. They included AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Nvidia, Databricks, Snowflake, Groq and Dell, among others.

Some in the industry are upbeat about Meta’s prospects. “Right now, people are excited because of [the] Lamborghini. That’s OpenAI,” said Laurent Gil of Cast AI, a company that helps businesses cut their cloud costs. “Everybody wants to buy the Lamborghini. But Llama 3 is creating the Toyota. And guess what? There are more Toyotas than Lamborghinis,” he said.

Gil said most businesses don’t know which models to use and get caught up in the “hype” around OpenAI. He argued that Meta will win out because companies will recognize Llama as a lower-cost, high-quality alternative to the proprietary models.

Meta is working on ways to get more businesses to use Llama. In recent weeks, Meta executives have been in discussions with Snowflake about expanding on an existing Llama sales arrangement by allowing customers of the data analytics giant to train custom versions of Llama using their own data on Snowflake’s platform, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.

It doesn’t help that Llama ranks behind rivals like OpenAI, Google and Anthropic, according to the Chatbot Arena, a project from research group Lmsys and the University of California that evaluates AI models.

Yet some businesses are embracing Llama. Goldman Sachs is on track to spend over $1 million this year running Llama on Microsoft’s Azure cloud, primarily to automate coding, according to someone familiar with the company. (Goldman has used a range of other LLMs, The Information has previously reported.) Amazon, meanwhile, has said Japanese bank Nomura and outsourcing company TaskUs are using Llama through AWS.

“Meta is teaching businesses how to build their own large language models,” said Vin Vashishta, an AI advisor to companies.

AWS Talks

Meta is spending tens of billions on new AI chips to expand its computing capacity for its AI push. Precisely how that effort will generate a return is hazy.

Meta isn’t planning on directly charging either consumers or businesses for its LLMs, which are released as open-source software, unlike the models developed by OpenAI, Google and others. (Zuckerberg has, however, hinted at the possibility of Meta sharing in the revenue of the cloud firms that sell Llama.)

Zuckerberg has said Meta can utilize AI to improve its advertising business. More broadly, if Meta can make Llama the industry standard, it can undercut the efforts of rival companies with the same goal.

In a blog post last month, Zuckerberg likened Meta’s open-source strategy to past successful efforts to develop the Linux operating system as the industry standard for both cloud computing and mobile devices.

To broaden the distribution for Llama on various other companies’ platforms, Zuckerberg has had to navigate the complexities of the tech industry, where companies frequently must partner with their competitors in various ways.

Google—whose cloud unit offers Llama to its customers—competes with Meta in digital advertising, for instance. Microsoft, whose Azure cloud unit also offers Llama, has partnered with OpenAI, whose large language models compete with Llama. Amazon, though, already has a close relationship with Meta.

Amazon has long been a major advertiser on Meta. Last year, Amazon partnered with Meta to allow people to buy Amazon products through ads on Facebook and Instagram without leaving the social media sites.

Meta is also a longstanding customer of AWS. It has been using Amazon for small cloud tasks for about a decade. In recent months, executives from Amazon and Meta have been negotiating a potential deal that would boost Meta’s spending on AWS, likely to more than $1 billion per year, making Meta one of the service’s largest customers, according to a person involved in the discussions. Meta currently spends between $250 million and $500 million on AWS and Azure cloud services, according to The Information’s Cloud Database.

As part of the deal under discussion, Meta is also pushing AWS for discounted access to graphics processing units, including those from Nvidia, the person said. GPUs are the specialized AI chips used in training LLMs. Meta and AWS did not comment on the talks.

Meta has already ordered 350,000 Nvidia H100 chips for delivery by the end of this year, Zuckerberg said on an Instagram live video in January. In the same video, Zuckerberg said Meta was building a “massive amount of infrastructure” to support its AI plans.

Business History

Meta and AWS have already worked together on selling an enterprise product.

Around 2019, the two companies partnered on selling PyTorch, an open-source software library Meta built to create AI applications. Over the course of several years, PyTorch ended up as the most popular research-focused product in a market that also included Google’s TensorFlow, a similar open-source product, three former Meta employees said.

Things between Meta and AWS didn’t always go smoothly. During the PyTorch efforts, employees at Meta grew frustrated with AWS’ sales operation, two former Meta employees said. Some felt AWS was too slow to push PyTorch out to enterprise customers, the former employees said.

AWS provides Llama through its Bedrock platform, which offers customers a variety of different LLMs. AWS’ pitch is that it offers several models and lets customers pick what they want. Other models available include Amazon’s own Titan and models from Anthropic and Cohere.

An Amazon spokesperson said the company believes having a choice of foundation models is important, and a single model will not be right for every use case.

A Meta spokesperson said the company is “very happy with the [AWS] collaboration,” but did not comment on the rates of uptake for Llama 3.1.

TechCrunch : Bodies of Autonomy founder Mike Lynch and his daughter recovered fr

Bodies of Autonomy founder Mike Lynch and his daughter recovered from sunken Bayesian yacht

Grim news coming in from Sicily, Italy. Mike Lynch, the U.K. investor and founder of IT company Autonomy, has been identified as one of two bodies recovered from the Bayesian, the yacht that sunk off the coast of Sicily early Monday, according to several reports coming out of the country that cite the chief of Civil Protection, Salvo Cocina.

Lynch’s daughter, Hannah, has also been identified.

The news caps off a grim few days of events. The boat, registered to Lynch’s wife, Angela Bacares, quickly capsized in the early hours of Monday after it was struck by a tornado-like water column. Bacares was among the 15 survivors, but three bodies have now been found and four more are still being recovered from the wreck. Those yet to be found include the international chairman of Morgan Stanley bank, his wife, a lawyer from New York who worked with Lynch, and his wife.

As we previously reported, the Bayesian was on a voyage to celebrate Lynch’s acquittal in a criminal fraud trial in the U.S. earlier this summer. That trial also involved a co-defendant, Stephen Chamberlain.

In a tragic coincidence, Chamberlain was hit by a car last Saturday and died of his wounds earlier this week.

Lynch was one of the most well-known and colorful figures in the U.K. technology world — sometimes referred to as the “Bill Gates of U.K. tech.”

HP acquired Lynch’s enterprise technology firm Autonomy in 2011 for $11 billion — a major milestone for U.K. technology and one of the biggest tech M&A deals at the time. But it quickly turned sour, and HP sued Lynch and Autonomy’s director of finance, Chamberlain, arguing it was misled in the transaction.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2024
Join 10,000+ startup & VC leaders, gain insights from tech giants, engage in 300+ Roundtables & Breakouts
San Francisco | October 28-30
Register with a Discount
HP claimed that the deal led to a $4 billion+ loss — money it then demanded from Lynch and Chamberlain. Lynch (pictured above, left) and his co-defendant long asserted that they acted in good faith and were being made into scapegoats over a merger gone bad.

That legal drama went on for more than a decade and involved a host of other thorny chapters, including Lynch’s extradition to the U.S. over the DoJ criminal suit (the one that only recently concluded with acquittal) and a lot of very bad publicity for him. It also included a second, civil case that took place in 2022 in the U.K., which Lynch lost.

The U.S. criminal case, where Lynch and Chamberlain were charged with 15 counts of fraud and conspiracy and could have spelled jail for the pair, went to trial earlier this year in San Francisco. Then finally, in June, Lynch and Chamberlain were acquitted.

In the interim years, Lynch built up a profile in the U.K. as a prominent investor, most prominently as the founder of Invoke Capital.

The VC firm was the biggest investor in cybersecurity firm Darktrace, a connection that was not without its own controversy. It also invested in Sophia Genetics, Featurespace and Luminance, among others. And it appeared that this is the route that he had been planning to continue to pursue.

“I am elated with today’s verdict and grateful to the jury for their attention to the facts over the last 10 weeks. My deepest thanks go to my legal team for their tireless work on my behalf,” Lynch said at the time of the acquittal in June. “I am looking forward to returning to the U.K. and getting back to what I love most: my family and innovating in my field.”

Our thoughts go out to Lynch’s (and Chamberlain’s) family, friends and colleagues. We have also reached out to Lynch’s spokespeople and will update this post as we learn more.