FT : Bank traders lose big on AbbVie-Shire bets

Bank traders lose big on AbbVie-Shire bets

City of London trading desks at several big investment banks lost money after the collapse of AbbVie’s $54bn takeover offer for Shire, raising fresh questions about whether banks are skirting a ban on making speculative bets with their own funds.
Banks including Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Barclays and Goldman Sachs suffered losses from holding large positions in Shire stock when AbbVie withdrew its offer for the UK drug company in October, sending Shire shares tumbling in value.

While investment banks are permitted under the so-called Volcker rule to hold inventories of shares to sell on to their clients, senior bankers said it was not typical to hold such a large exposure to a single company in a takeover situation solely for market making purposes.
Citi lost in the region of $20m, and Credit Suisse about $6m, people familiar with the positions said. The other banks’ losses were unclear.
“It is difficult to justify this sort of activity as normal market making,” said one senior investment banker in London. Barclays, Credit Suisse, Citi and Goldman Sachs all declined to comment.
Betting on AbbVie’s offer for Shire being completed was one of the largest hedge fund trades of this year. Several of the biggest and most well-resourced hedge funds lost tens of millions of dollars when the deal fell apart amid pressure from the US government over AbbVie’s aim to relocate its tax domicile to the UK.
Citi, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Barclays are all large market makers in Shire shares, meaning they regularly hold inventory of the company’s shares.
Citi and Goldman Sachs’ corporate finance arms, which are separated from their trading desks by so-called Chinese walls, were also advising Shire on the approach from AbbVie.
After investment banks relied on government support during the financial crisis, regulators introduced new rules in the US to prevent them from speculating using their own capital, a practice known as proprietary trading.
Many banks have since said they no longer engage in any form of proprietary trading, and have spun off the once-sprawling divisions that used to trade in this way.
The Volcker rule, named after former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker and which bans banks from proprietary trading, was one of the centrepieces of the US Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation of 2010 following the collapse of Lehman Brothers two years earlier.
“This is a dirty secret in London,” said one hedge fund manager. “Everyone knows that the trading desks at the banks take positions in these sorts of deals through their market making operations.”
Regulators have jousted with banks over where the line is drawn between legitimate market making, in which they buy and sell securities on behalf of clients, and proprietary trading. Banks argue that overly strict regulation would hinder their ability to serve their clients.
The final version of the Volcker rule, which was delayed by four years as banks lobbied over its wording, gave market makers a greater amount of flexibility on activities that involve buying and selling shares and bonds on behalf of clients.

FT : Accor signs deal for China expansion

Accor signs deal for China expansion

Accor has signed a strategic alliance with China Lodging Group in a move that is set to more than double the number of its hotels in the fast-growing Chinese market within five years.
The alliance will bring together the French hotel group’s brands, which include Ibis and Mercure, with China Lodging’s 1,900 existing hotels in China, the companies said on Sunday.

China Lodging, also known as Huazhu, said it would open between 350 and 400 new hotels under Accor’s budget and mid-scale brands in the coming years, significantly boosting the French group’s presence in the world’s most populous country.
Accor, the world’s sixth-biggest hotel group with 3,700 hotels in more than 90 countries, already has 144 hotels in China — about 100 of them in the budget and mid-scale categories.
In a statement, Sebastien Bazin, Accor’s chairman and chief executive officer, said that the alliance would “strengthen our leadership in the Chinese market over the long term”.
As part of the agreement, Accor’s economy and mid-scale hotels in China will become part of Huazhu, which will also become Accor’s master franchisee for the China region. In return, Accor will take a 10 per cent stake in the company as well as a seat on Huazhu’s board.
The two companies said that Huazhu would take a 10 per cent stake in Accor’s luxury and upscale hotels in China, though the Paris-based group will continue to own and develop them.
The two companies also said that they would link their loyalty programmes, giving members in each programme access to a global network of 5,600 hotels. Mr Bazin said that linking the programmes was “key to our digital transformation”.
The alliance caps a dynamic period in the year or so since Mr Bazin took over at Accor. First came the plan in November last year to turn his back on the “asset-light” model followed by so many of his competitors, which involves selling properties to concentrate on hotel management.
Then, in May, Accor announced that it had agreed to acquire close to 100 hotels in Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland for €900m as part of a lease buyback programme to boost its real estate portfolio.
In October, the group said like-for-like revenue in the third quarter increased 4.6 per cent compared with a year ago to €1.5bn.

WSJ : Sydney Cafe Siege Sparks Terror Fears


Sydney Cafe Siege Sparks Terror Fears

SYDNEY—Large parts of central Sydney were in lockdown Monday after at least one gunman took hostages in a cafe and placed an Islamic flag in the window, sparking concerns a terrorist attack was under way.

Authorities sealed off surrounding streets, evacuated people from buildings, and suspended several rail routes into and out of the city after the incident began around 9:45 a.m. at the Lindt Chocolate Café in Martin Place in the heart of the business district.

New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione confirmed that an armed offender was holding an undisclosed number of hostages in a building in the Martin Place area. Police hadn’t had contact with the offender and were still determining his motivation, but a terrorist attack couldn’t be ruled out, the commissioner said.

As many as 40 people were thought to be held in the cafe, a popular stop for shoppers seeking Christmas gifts. Photographs broadcast on television showed people inside with their hands pressed against the window.

It wasn’t clear if anyone inside was linked to hard-line Islamic groups, such as Islamic State, which have been the focus of a crackdown by authorities in recent weeks.

Police declined to say how many people are thought to be in the store, but local media quoted the head of Lindt & Sprungli in Australia, the owner of the cafe, as saying there may have been up to 10 staff and 30 customers inside when the armed man entered. Company officials couldn’t be reached for comment.

Martin Place is a pedestrian area that connects some of the city’s main shopping areas—and isn’t far from big attractions such as the Sydney Opera House and the city’s main ferry terminal. The incident comes days before the Christmas holiday, when the area gets especially busy.

“We don’t yet know the motivation of the perpetrator,” Prime Minister Tony Abbott said in Canberra. “We don’t know whether this is politically motivated, though obviously there are some indications that it could be.” The prime minister said New South Wales state police were responding to the incident with strong support from federal agencies.

The black flag placed in the cafe window was inscribed with the shahadah, a profession of Muslim faith, which is spoken in mosques daily. That flag has been used previously by al Qaeda and by Jabhat al Nusra in Syria. The flag isn’t banned in Australia.

Mr. Abbott earlier said he’d convened a meeting of the security inner circle in his cabinet to discuss the response to the incident. Australian police haven’t confirmed they are involved in an antiterror operation.


Martin Place is the location of restaurants, the central bank and offices of companies including Commonwealth Bank of Australia and the Channel 7 television station. A spokeswoman for Macquarie Group Ltd. said the investment bank was relocating some staff from its building at 50 Martin Place to other premises in the city, while other employees would work from home for the day. Several other companies also closed their offices and told staff to go home, or made the decision to remain behind locked doors.

Sydney’s Opera House was among the buildings evacuated as part of the police response to the siege, as police boats patrolled the nearby harbor. The country’s share market fell on the uncertainty, as did the Australian dollar.

“I have lived in Sydney my whole life and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Liz Riley, an 18-year-old hospitality worker, who worked nearby. “You don’t think this is the type of thing that would happen here.”

At a cafe opposite Sydney’s busy ferry terminal, Circular Quay, manager Michael Salvartzis appeared upset. The CQ Cafe is normally open 365 days a year, and this is the first time in the five years he has been running it that he’s had to close down.

“Lock up, guys, we have to lock up,” he yelled at his staff, who were still serving cappuccinos and fruit smoothies to tourists sitting on tables in the sun. “Last orders, this is it. The whole CBD is locking up. We have to do it. It’s an order.”

Islamic community leaders expressed shock and anger at the siege. Australia has experienced sweeping terrorism raids recently, in addition to the police shooting of an 18 year-old Islamic State sympathizer in September. Muslim leaders fear the latest development risks igniting community tension, and may lead to acts of random retaliation.

Earlier Monday, the Federal Police arrested a 25-year-old man from a northern Sydney suburb on suspicion of financing terrorism, but police later said there was no link to the current siege.

Around 70 men have had their passports confiscated in recent months due to suspicions they planned to leave the country to fight for Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, authorities say.

“The most important thing is the safety and well-being of the hostages,” said Nail Aykan, General Manager of the Islamic Council of Victoria. “But there are also repercussions for prejudice-motivated crime—we don’t want a domino effect into wider society,” he said.

Australia is home to about 476,000 Muslims, many of whom fled violence in Lebanon in the 1970s and ’80s. Many built prosperous lives and worked to promote assimilation in mosques and community centers, inviting politicians to speak and holding open houses for people of other faiths.

An ambulance enters the cordoned off area on Elizabeth Street. Groups of firefighters and police officers wait near the edge of the perimeter. ENLARGE
An ambulance enters the cordoned off area on Elizabeth Street. Groups of firefighters and police officers wait near the edge of the perimeter. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Many Muslim leaders trace today’s extremism in part to December 2005, when a fight between young Muslim men and two white lifeguards on a suburban beach near Sydney led to a demonstration that drew some 5,000 whites, some of whom chanted racist slogans and viciously attacked dark-skinned beachgoers.

In the days that followed, gangs of youths, mainly of Arab descent, rampaged across Sydney’s predominantly white suburbs, smashing windows with machetes, baseball bats and other weapons.

Mr. Abbott urged people to remain calm. “The whole point of politically motivated violence is to scare people out of being themselves,” he said. “We have to appreciate that even in a society such as ours, that there are people who would wish to do us harm. That’s why we have police and security organizations of the utmost professionalism that are ready and able to respond to a whole range of situations.”

WSJ : PetSmart to Be Acquired by BC Partners-Led Group

PetSmart to Be Acquired by BC Partners-Led Group
Investor Group to Pay About $8.25 Billion

PetSmart Inc. agreed to be bought by a group led by BC Partners Inc. for about $8.25 billion, in the largest private-equity buyout of the year.

The group agreed to pay $83 a share for the pet-supply retailer, according to a statement. Besides BC, the group includes some of its limited partners as well as Longview Asset Management LLC, which controls a roughly 9% stake in PetSmart and under the deal would continue to hold some of that.

BC prevailed in the auction over rival buyout firm Apollo Global Management LLC.

PetSmart began contemplating a sale this summer amid pressure to do so from shareholders including Longview and activist investor Jana Partners LLC.

Jana disclosed a 9.9% stake in the company in July. Days after that, Longview, a longtime PetSmart investor, sent the board a letter urging it to hire bankers to consider a deal or other options.

The takeover would be a rare private-equity buyout in a year in which such firms have been priced out of the mergers-and-acquisitions market by lofty stock prices.

PetSmart, which was founded in 1987, has about 1,350 stores, more than half of which contain full-service veterinary hospitals, according to securities filings.

The Phoenix retailer has given up market share to competitors such as Target Corp. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc., as well as e-commerce giant Amazon.com Inc.

A number of retailers have come under pressure in recent years as consumers changed shopping habits and began shopping online more. Last year, office-supply retailers Office Depot Inc. and OfficeMax Inc. merged. In the dollar store category, both Dollar General Corp. and Dollar Tree Inc. are currently trying to buy Family Dollar Stores Inc.

(BFW) BC Partners-Led Consortium to Buy PetSmart for $8.7 Billion


BFW 12/14 21:12 *BC PARTNERS-LED CONSORTIUM TO BUY PETSMART FOR $8.7 BILLION
BN 12/14 21:12 *BC PARTNERS-LED CONSORTIUM TO BUY PETSMART FOR $8.7 BILLION

BC Partners-Led Consortium to Buy PetSmart for $8.7 Billion
2014-12-14 21:15:50.209 GMT


By Dan Hart
(Bloomberg) -- Group to pay $83-shr in cash representing
~39% over July 2 closing price, acquiring group says in
statement.
* Statement: {NSN NGLC1CMEQTXC <GO>}

Link to Company News:{2496Z LN <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{PETM US <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the reporter on this story:
Dan Hart in Washington at +1-202-624-1870 or
dahart@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
John Simpson at +1-416-203-5726 or
jsimpson12@bloomberg.net

>>> Crude Crash Set To Continue After Arab Emirates Hint $40 Oil

Crude Crash Set To Continue After Arab Emirates Hint $40 Oil Coming Next
In space, no one can hear you scream... unless you happen to be Venezuela's (soon to be former) leader Nicolas Maduro, who has been doing a lot of screaming this morning following news that UAE's Energy Minister Suhail Al-Mazrouei said OPEC will stand by its decision not to cut crude output "even if oil prices fall as low as $40 a barrel" and will wait at least three months before considering an emergency meeting.
In doing so, OPEC not only confirms that the once mighty cartel is essentially non-existant and has been replaced by the veto vote of the lowest-cost exporters (again, sorry Maduro), but that all those energy hedge funds (and not only) who hoped that by allowing margin calls to go straight to voicemail on Friday afternoon, their troubles would go away because of some magical intervention by OPEC over the weekend, are about to have a very unpleasant Monday, now that the next oil price bogey has been set: $40 per barrell.
Luckily, this will be so "unambiguously good" for the US consumer, it should surely offset the epic capex destruction that is about to be unleashed on America's shale patch, in junk bond hedge funds around the globe, and as millions of high-paying jobs created as a result of the shale miracle are pink slipped.
According to Bloomberg, OPEC won’t immediately change its Nov. 27 decision to keep the group’s collective output target unchanged at 30 million barrels a day, Suhail Al-Mazrouei said. Venezuela supports an OPEC meeting given the price slide, though the country hasn’t officially requested one, an official at Venezuela’s foreign ministry said Dec. 12. The group is due to meet again on June 5. 
“We are not going to change our minds because the prices went to $60 or to $40,” Mazrouei told Bloomberg at a conference in Dubai. “We’re not targeting a price; the market will stabilize itself.” He said current conditions don’t justify an extraordinary OPEC meeting. “We need to wait for at least a quarter” to consider an urgent session, he said.
And with OPEC’s 12 members pumped 30.56 million barrels a day in November, exceeding their collective target for a sixth straight month, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait this month deepened discounts on shipments to Asia, feeding speculation that they’re fighting for market share amid a glut fed by surging U.S. shale production.
The above only focuses on the (unchanged) supply side of the equation - and since the entire world is rolling over into yet another round of global recession, following not only a Chinese slowdown to a record low growth rate, but also a recession in both Japan and Europe, the just as important issue is where demand will be in the coming year. The answer:much lower.
OPEC's unchanged production level, a lower demand growth forecast from the International Energy Agency further put the skids under oil on Friday, raising concerns of possible broader negative effects such as debt defaults by companies and countries heavily exposed to crude prices. There was also talk of the price trend adding to deflation pressures in Europe, increasing bets that the European Central Bank will be forced to resort to further stimulus early next year.
And while the bankruptcy advisors and "fondos buitre" as they are known in Buenos Aires, are circling Venezuela whose default is essentially just a matter of day, OPEC is - just in case its plan to crush higher cost production fails - doing a little of the "good cop" routing as a Plan B.
According to Reuters, OPEC secretary general tried to moderate the infighting within the oil exporters, saying "OPEC can ride out a slump in oil prices and keep output unchanged, arguing market weakness did not reflect supply and demand fundamentals and could have been driven by speculators."
Ah yes, it had been a while since we heard the good old "evil speculators" excuse. Usually it appeared when crude prices soared. Now, it has re-emerged to explain the historic plunge of crude.
Speaking at a conference in Dubai, Abdullah al-Badri defended November's decision by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries to not cut its output target of 30 million barrels per day (bdp) in the face of a drop in crude prices to multi-year lows.

 

"We agreed that it is important to continue with production (at current levels) for the ... coming period. This decision was made by consensus by all ministers," he said. "The decision has been made. Things will be left as is."

 

Some say selling may continue as few participants are yet willing to call a bottom for markets.
There is some hope for the falling knife catchers: "Badri suggested the crude price fall had been overdone. "The fundamentals should not lead to this dramatic reduction (in price)," he said in Arabic through an English interpreter. He said only a small increase in supply had lead to a sharp drop in prices, adding: "I believe that speculation has entered strongly in deciding these prices.""
Unfortunately for the crude longs, Badri is lying, as can be gleaned from the following statement:
Badri said OPEC sought a price level that was suitable and satisfactory both for consumers and producers, but did not specify a figure. The OPEC chief also said November's decision was not aimed at any other oil producer, rebutting suggestions it was intended to either undermine the economics of U.S. shale oil production or weaken rival powers closer to home.

 

"Some people say this decision was directed at the United States and shale oil. All of this is incorrect. Some also say it was directed at Iran and Russia. This also is incorrect," he said.
Well actually... "Saudi Arabia's oil minister Ali al-Naimi had told last month's OPEC meeting the organization must combat the U.S. shale oil boom, arguing for maintaining output to depress prices and undermine the profitability of North American producers, said a source who was briefed by a non-Gulf OPEC minister."
And as Europe has shown repeatedly, not only is it serious when you have to lie, but it is even worse when you can't remember what lies you have said in the past. That alone assures that the chaos within OPEC - if only for purely optical reasons - will only get worse and likely lead to least a few sovereign defaults as the petroleum exporting organization mutates to meet the far lower demand levels of the new normal.
In the meantime, the only question is how much longer can stocks ignore the bloodbath in energy (where there has been much interstellar screaming too) because as we showed on Friday, despite the worst week for stocks in 3 years, equities have a long way to go if and when they finally catch up, or rather down, with the crude reality...

Recode.net : FBI: Iran Hackers May Target U.S. Energy, Defense Firms

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has warned U.S. businesses to be on the alert for a sophisticated Iranian hacking operation whose targets include defense contractors, energy firms and educational institutions, according to a confidential agency document.

The operation is the same as one flagged last week by cyber security firm Cylance Inc as targeting critical infrastructure organizations worldwide, cyber security experts said. Cylance has said it uncovered more than 50 victims from what it dubbed Operation Cleaver, in 16 countries, including the United States.

The FBI’s confidential “Flash” report, seen by Reuters on Friday, provides technical details about malicious software and techniques used in the attacks, along with advice on thwarting the hackers. It asked businesses to contact the FBI if they believed they were victims.

Cylance Chief Executive Stuart McClure said the FBI warning suggested that the Iranian hacking campaign may have been larger than its own research revealed. “It underscores Iran’s determination and fixation on large-scale compromise of critical infrastructure,” he said.

The FBI’s technical document said the hackers typically launch their attacks from two IP addresses that are in Iran, but did not attribute the attacks to the Tehran government. Cylance has said it believes Iran’s government is behind the campaign, a claim Iran has vehemently denied.

An FBI official did not provide further details, but said the agency routinely provides private industry with advisories to help it fend off cyber threats.

The Pentagon and National Security Agency had no immediate comment.

Tehran has been substantially increasing investment in its cyber capabilities since 2010, when its nuclear program was hit by the Stuxnet computer virus, widely believed to have been launched by the United States and Israel.

Cyber security professionals who investigate cyber attacks said that they are seeing evidence that Iran’s investment is paying off.

“They are good and have a lot of talent in the country,” said Dave Kennedy, CEO of TrustedSEC LLC. “They are definitely a serious threat, no question.”

Iranian hackers are increasingly being blamed for sophisticated cyberattacks.

Bloomberg Businessweek on Thursday reported that Iranian hacker activists were responsible for a devastating February 2014 attack on casino operator Las Vegas Sands Corp, which crippled thousands of servers by wiping them with destructive malware. It said the hackers sought to punish Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson for comments he made about detonating a nuclear bomb in Iran.

(BFW) CGG Board Found None of Technip Proposals Created Value for Co.


CGG Board Found None of Technip Proposals Created Value for Co.
2014-12-14 20:03:10.398 GMT


By John Simpson
(Bloomberg) -- CGG says it was open to dialogue with
Technip after unsolicited approach on Nov. 10, but determined
that none of the proposed options “were creating value for the
company and its shareholders.”
* CGG says it remains confident in its future as an
independent co., noting that 3Q results show “important
progresses achieved and milestones met” and balance sheet
strengthened
* Says it is in position to “weather current difficult market
conditions while fully benefiting from future geoscience
market rebound”
* NOTE: Earlier, Technip Doesn’t Intend to File a Tender Offer
for CGG Link
Link to Statement:Link
Link to Company News:CGG FP <Equity> CN <GO>
Link to Company News:TEC FP <Equity> CN <GO>

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
John Simpson at +1-416-203-5726 or
jsimpson12@bloomberg.net

WWD : Pambianco Study: Armani, Zegna, Dolce & Gabbana Best Suited for IPOs

Pambianco Study: Armani, Zegna, Dolce & Gabbana Best Suited for IPOs

MILAN — Investors thirsty for a piece of Italian fashion and design could have many enticing options to choose from if only Italy’s entrepreneurs were a bit less averse to the stock market.

Closely-held Giorgio Armani, Gianni Versace, Missoni and Renzo Rosso’s OTB — among others — all have the necessary qualifications for successful stock market listings, according to research by Pambianco Strategie di Impresa, which Thursday published its fourth annual report on the 50 most “listable” Italian fashion and luxury goods firms.

While there are about a dozen new entries (and an equivalent number of departures) the list remains anchored around what Pambianco president Carlo Pambianco called a “hard core” of 29 firms, which have been in the list each year. (These, however, don’t seem inclined to make the jump from “listable” to listed.)

During a conference held at Italy’s Stock Exchange to present the research, Pambianco said the firms on the top-50 list could be ready for an initial public offering within three to five years.

Unsurprisingly, Giorgio Armani came in at the top of the list for the second year in a row, followed by Ermenegildo Zegna (which recently announced the separation of its real estate unit, leading to some speculation that it might be gearing up for a listing — promptly squashed by the men’s wear giant) and Dolce & Gabbana. Armani certainly is the juggernaut in the group, with 2013 sales of 2.2 billion euros, or $2.7 billion at current exchange, almost twice number-two-ranked Zegna’s 1.3 billion euros, or $1.6 billion.

Rounding out the top five most “listable” firms are — also in the same positions as last year — cosmetics retailer Kiko and high-end men’s wear maker Stefano Ricci.

Aside from fashion, Pambianco issued its second 15 most “listable” design firms, which uses the same ranking criteria as the fashion and luxury goods top 50. The top three spots this year go to Flos (second in 2013), Kartell (first in 2013) and B&B Italia (same as last year). Other famous design names, including Artemide, Minotti and Poliform, were reconfirmed, while Arper (in 7th place) and Trend (13th) are newcomers.

Pambianco explained that the methodology used to create the rankings is based on assigning points to eight factors — including sales and profitability growth, brand awareness, company size and distribution network reach. Based on a maximum possible score of 100, in the fashion and luxury goods rankings, Armani scored 81.4 points, Zegna scored 79.8 and Dolce & Gabbana came in with 76.5.

While most companies were repeats, new entries include Corneliani, Valentino, Pinko and Trussardi. Brands including Slowear, Santoni, Marcolin and Alviero Martini were left out this year.

Luca Peyrano, head of capital markets at Borsa Italiana, said there was great interest on the part of foreign investors in “made in Italy.” The last four fashion-luxury goods listings in Milan raised a combined 1.2 billion euros, or $1.5 billion, while investors demanded shares worth up to 25 billion euros, or $31 billion, he said, adding: “I can’t think of a single better reason to list on the stock market.”

If all the 65 companies in the two Pambianco rankings (fashion and design) sought stock market listings they would likely raise more than 12 billion euros, or $15 billion, and have a combined market capitalization of more than 40 billion euros, or $50 billion, he said. “We [Milan] could become the stock market with the highest level of attractiveness for listings in the sector.”

Giovanni Tinuper, a PWC partner who collaborated with Pambianco on the research, said that Italy’s fashion, luxury goods and design industries are worth some 65 billion euros, or $81 billion, in annual sales and generate more than 600,000 jobs.

Despite the obvious advantages of a stock market listing — not only in terms of raising capital, but also in terms of brand awareness and access to high-quality managerial skills — Italian entrepreneurs seem to remain mostly averse to the Bourse. Some apparently think it is too challenging for their companies, some fear handing over control to outsiders. “We know the word ‘listing’ generates anxiety in entrepreneurs,” said Peyrano, joking, as he pointed out that — while being a fairly disciplinary process — preparations for IPOs are not necessarily more complex than selling shares to private equity funds. “We would like the ‘hard core’ to soften up a bit, to go from ‘listable’ to listed.”

Peyrano explained that Borsa Italiana’s Elite program is designed “to help firms open up to outside capital, through stock market listings, but also by preparing them for sales to private equity, for debt offerings and even for mergers and acquisitions.”

One entrepreneur at the event, Domenico Menniti, head of fashion brand Harmont & Blaine, which recently opened its capital to a private equity firm and aims for a stock market listing sometime around the end of 2017 or early 2018, said that the Elite program is “hard work” and “lacks psychological support.” He said that for firms considering a listing, it was “worrying” to see how a company like Tod’s SpA’s shares could be hammered over the past year “for no clear reason.” Peyrano retorted that Tod’s owner Diego Della Valle “is probably very calm. He’s already been through periods where his company’s shares were overvalued and undervalued with respect to the fundamentals.” The important thing, he said, is to have a medium to long-term view.

In the end, however, above all it’s about ambition. If a company is happy with sales of some 1.5 to 2 billion euros, or $1.9 to $2.5 billion, “then, as an entrepreneur, I’m settling for second best,” Peyrano said, adding: “It’s not so much a question of necessity, but of entrepreneurship, of growing abroad and giving myself the tools which will allow me to break into foreign markets, grow and increase my profitability.”

One firm thinking about an IPO is women’s wear and accessories maker Kocca, ranked 47th in this year’s top 50, the same position as last year. Based in Nola, near Naples, not far from Harmont & Blaine, chief executive Andrea Miranda told WWD the company has almost completed the Elite program and is considering whether to open its capital to private equity funds (“we get contacted frequently”) or to list. “If we do list, our main aim would be to raise funds for international growth and we would definitely list in Italy,” Miranda said. Kocca will end 2014 with around 55 million euros, or $68 million, in sales and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of around 15 percent. By 2017, Miranda said he sees sales hitting a maximum of 75 million euros, or $93 million.

Meanwhile, another Italian brand — leather goods maker Fedon — is soon to list its shares on Milan’s AIM market for small and medium-size companies, Pambianco News reported Wednesday. Fedon is not new to the stock market: The company has been listed on Paris Euronext since 1988. The dual listing would serve also to increase the brand’s visibility.