TechCrunch : GrabTaxi, Uber’s SoftBank-Backed Rival In Southeast Asia, Tests Cou

GrabTaxi, Uber’s SoftBank-Backed Rival In Southeast Asia, Tests Courier Service

GrabTaxi, the Uber rival backed by SoftBank, is trialling a next-day delivery service as it experiments with logistics-related offerings beyond its core taxi-hailing business in Southeast Asia.

The ‘Parcel-Document’ service quietly went live in Bangkok, Thailand, this week in partnership with e-commerce company AlphaFAST. GrabTaxi customers can summon a courier inside the GrabTaxi application in the same way that they’d order a taxi (see below). The document will be delivered the next day if booked before 3pm. It is initially charged at a flat rate: paperwork and documents cost 35 THB (just over $1), while parcels are 35 THB to 70 THB based on size.

GrabTaxi works with regular taxis and limousine private hire cars for its GrabTaxi and GrabCar services, but the company is using AlphaFAST’s fleet of scooters for this pilot.

GrabTaxi actually has a motorbike taxi service in Vietnam — that’s another of its trials — so it seems conceivable that the two could be compatible in the future, should it choose to launch them in new cities.

GrabTaxi declined to comment on record about this experiment, but, since it is leaning on a partner for resources, this looks like a low risk way to gauge demand for delivery services.

CEO Anthony Tan told TechCrunch that the firm would experiment with new services in the wake of SoftBank’s $250 million investment in it last December, and this is one of the first ideas to be floated. Another is Uber-like cashless payments, which is set to be trialled in Singapore.

Uber has offered bicycle couriers in New York, but ‘UberRush’ is yet to expand into Southeast Asia, or indeed any countries outside of the U.S..

GrabTaxi isn’t the only SoftBank-backed taxi app firm to take a leaf from the Uber playbook of late. Ola launched a food delivery service in four cities in India last week.

Telegraph : Europe blocks desperate Greek attempt to stay afloat

Europe blocks desperate Greek attempt to stay afloat
Eurozone says it is "legally impossible" to return €1.2bn in rescue funds to cash-strapped Athens

The Greek government will not receive €1.2bn (£883m) in European rescue funds after the bloc's officials ruled the Leftist government had no legal claims on the cash.
Athens requested a return of the funds it said were erroneously handed to creditors from Greece's own bank recapitalisation fund, the Hellenic Financial Stability Facility (HFSF).
The transfer was originally arranged by the previous Greek administration.
But eurozone offcials have blocked the claim, saying it is "legally impossible" transfer the money back to the debt-stricken country.
"There was agreement that, legally, there was no over payment from the HFSF to the EFSF," said a fund spokesman.
Germany's finance ministry was also reluctant to allow the release, claiming there was "no reason" to make the transfer.
The decision is a further blow to the Greek government's attempts to stay afloat over the next few weeks.
Athens has been scrambling to make repayments to its creditors and continue to pay wages and pensions. The government now faces another €450m cash squeeze at the beginning of April.

As part of its efforts to stay solvent, the Leftist government has also requested a €1.9bn transfer of profits held by the European Central Bank, from the holdings of its Greek debt.
So far, the ECB has rebuffed all Greek pleas to alleviate their cash squeeze. The central bank has moved to officially ban the country's banks from increasing their holdings of short-term government debt.
Greek banks are being kept alive through the provision of an expensive form of emergency liquidity (ELA) which is rapidly being used up as capital flees the country. The ECB decided to incrementally raise the limit on ELA to €71bn on Wednesday, according to reports.

WSJ : China Bank Blues Just Getting Started

Chinese banks are slowly admitting they have a few bad loans stuffed in their balance sheets. Investors should brace for more.

Two of the country’s big four state-owned lenders have now reported full-year 2014 earnings, and both showed rising costs from soured loans. Net profit, which for some time has grown in double digits, rose last year by just 8% for both Bank of China and Agricultural Bank of China, known as AgBank. Their figures show that a profit pothole formed at the end of the year, with implied fourth-quarter net profit rising just 5% for Bank of China and 4% for AgBank.

More worryingly, nonperforming loans for the year rose 37% at Bank of China and 42% at AgBank. Midsize lender China Citic Bank, which reported earlier this month, saw nonperforming loans rise 43%.

Bank of China’s relative outperformance may be due to its bigger overseas exposure. At 27% of total assets, its international book is bigger than any competitor. Its overall nonperforming loan ratio came to 1.18%, below average for the sector, but the domestic NPL ratio was 1.47%.

These numbers would look even worse if lenders weren’t actively disposing of nonperforming loans by selling them to the asset-management companies set up in the 1990s to bail out the banks. An AgBank executive told reporters Tuesday the firm sold more than 26 billion yuan ($4.2 billion) worth of nonperforming loans to these companies last year, at 37 cents on the dollar.

An industry-wide nonperforming loan ratio of 1.29% at the end of last year, up from 1% a year earlier, may not sound so bad. But few investors believe the figures.

So it could be seen as welcome news that the banks are recognizing problem loans and disposing of hopeless assets. The problem is that no one knows how bad things will get.

In all likelihood, China is only at the early stages of a negative credit cycle. Economic growth is still slowing, and conditions in the property market are worsening. AgBank told analysts it thinks nonperforming loans are likely to peak in the second half of this year or in 2016, according to Barclays.

Resilient net interest margins, which rose in 2014 for both Bank of China and AgBank, are unlikely to be maintained. Interest rate cuts, and the gradual loosening of deposit rates, will squeeze margins going forward. This could reduce overall bank earnings by up to 3.9% this year and 10.5% in 2016, according to Barclays. The situation would intensify if People’s Bank of China Gov. Zhou Xiaochuan is right that deposit rates could be fully liberalized by the end of this year.

Bulls argue that Chinese bank stocks are cheap, hovering around book value. But that has been the case for years. With the outlook darkening on interest rates and loan quality, there’s no relief in sight.

WSJ : Vivendi Investors Shouldn’t Double Down with Bolloré

Vivendi Investors Shouldn’t Double Down with Bolloré
The attempt by Vivendi’s chairman to double his voting rights looks alarming

Vincent Bolloré is playing up to a stereotype.

The Vivendi chairman is under fire from activist investor Peter Schoenfeld, who wants the French company to pay a €9 billion ($9.9 billion) special dividend out of proceeds from asset sales, rather than hoarding cash for possible deals.

Given the lack of a clear vision for Vivendi’s future, active debate over how Vivendi should use its cash hoard has merit. Even investors willing to back Mr. Bolloré should welcome it. For while they might hope that everyone is in this together, Mr. Bolloré, also Vivendi’s largest shareholder, seems intent on tightening his grip.

Vivendi late Tuesday unsurprisingly asked shareholders to vote against Mr. Schoenfeld’s resolutions for its April meeting.

Nor would the company back a separate motion. Smaller French fund PhiTrust wants Vivendi to amend its bylaws so the so-called Florange law, passed last year, would not apply. This peculiarly French rule grants double voting rights to shareholders who have held their stock for more than two years. In the past, French companies could decide, with investors’ approval, to introduce such rights for longer-term investors, and about half the members of the CAC 40 index did so. Under the new law, those shareholders are set to get them by default, unless a motion is passed to prohibit this.

In theory, the law encourages long-term investing, limiting the influence of short-term speculators. In reality, it does no such thing. To qualify for double votes, investors must hold their stock in registered form, where effectively the shares are registered with and sometimes managed by the issuing company.

Even long-term institutional investors are reluctant to tie up their stock in this way: the shares must be converted into bearer form were they ever to be sold. The benefits, beyond not paying custodial fees, are dubious: For example, oil major Total’s website trumpets a “personal invitation” to shareholder meetings.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the rules merely tighten the grip of insiders and families who hold big stakes, or cement France’s network of supposedly strategic cross-shareholdings between its largest companies. And Vivendi is rare among France’s largest companies, particularly those without direct government involvement, in seeking to move from single to double voting.

From April 2016, two years after the law was adopted, Mr. Bolloré would get double votes on the 5% stake he has owned over that time, plus the votes on the 3% he bought recently after Vivendi’s stock fell sharply. That 3%, in turn, would quality for double votes after two years.

Mr. Bolloré’s Vivendi shareholding should align his interests with investors when it comes to his deal-making plans—especially in a market where valuations increasingly look stretched. Instead, by supporting double voting he casts himself as the billionaire industrial investor trying to grasp greater control.

That, if nothing else, should give all Vivendi shareholders pause for thought.

(BFW) Telefonica’s GVT Takeover Approved by Brazil Cade W/Restrictions


BFW 03/25 15:09 *TELEFONICA'S GVT TAKEOVER APPROVED BY BRAZIL CADE W/RESTRICTION
BN 03/25 15:08 *TELCO BREAKUP APPROVED BY BRAZIL'S CADE

Telefonica’s GVT Takeover Approved by Brazil Cade W/Restrictions
2015-03-25 15:14:16.952 GMT


By Anna Edgerton and Christiana Sciaudone
(Bloomberg) -- Brazil antitrust regulator, known as Cade,
also approved Telco SpA breakup; announcements made after voting
session in Brasilia today.
* Restrictions include:
* Telefonica can’t hold stake in Telecom Italia
* Vivendi can’t have influence in Telefonica Brasil or
increase stake in co.
* Vivendi can’t have influence in Telefonica Brasil or
increase stake in co.</li></ul>
* Vivendi committed to reducing its influence and not share
information of Telefonica and Telecom Italia: Cade
* NOTE: March 20: Telefonica renounced definitively all
“political rights” related to TI Link
* NOTE: Feb. 18: Cade technical team recommended deal to be
approved w/restrictions; also recommended approval of
separate deal involving breakup of holding co. Telco, which
has stake in Telecom Italia Link
* Telefonica owns stake in Telco and would hold direct
stake in Telecom Italia once Telco is dissolved
* Telefonica to use Telecom Italia stake as part of
payment to Vivendi for GVT
* Deals, once approved, will result in Vivendi holding
direct stake in both Telefonica Brasil and Telecom
Italia
* Deals, once approved, will result in Vivendi holding
direct stake in both Telefonica Brasil and Telecom
Italia</li></ul>
* NOTE: Telefonica Brasil said to plan 1.26b-euro share sale
to back its Spanish parent in GVT takeover, people with
knowledge of the matter told Bloomberg News on March 19 Link
* NOTE: Telefonica agreed to buy GVT from Vivendi for 7.7b
euros last yr



Link to Company News:{GVTT3 BZ <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{TEF SM <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{VIV FP <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{VIVT4 BZ <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{TIT IM <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{TIMP3 BZ <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the reporter on this story:
Anna Edgerton in Brasilia at +55-61-3329-1614 or
aedgerton@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Katerina Petroff at +44-20-3525-0733 or
kpetroff@bloomberg.net

>>> Yoigo expresses interest in Orange's potential divestitures to get EC cleara

Yoigo expresses interest in Orange's potential divestitures to get EC clearance 

Swedish telecom group TeliaSonera’s Spanish unit Yoigo has expressed interest in the assets that the French group Orange may be forced to sell in order to get approval for its acquisition of Jazztel, Europa Press reported. The Spanish-language report cited unspecified sources from Yoigo and said that the company has held discussions with the European Commission about the matter.

Talks are confidential and no official information has leaked about any potential concessions Orange may agree to in order to acquire Jazztel, the report went on to say. The EC’s objections to the deal are not known, but market sources speculate that the French group may have to sell fixed telecoms assets in both fiber and copper.

Orange’s outstanding assets could also be targeted by the Spanish operator MasMovil, which has also taken part in discussions in Brussels about Jazztel’s sale, the report went on to say.

Orange is the Spanish market’s largest alternative operator, the report noted.

A previous unsourced report said Orange has offered to transfer its network to MasMovil and Yoigo to get the European Commission’s (EC) approval of its planned acquisition of Jazztel.

Europa Press

(Challemges) Between Rothschild cousins, war is declared. (Google transaltion)



EXCLUSIVE - between the two branches of this financial dynasty, there is now talk through a lawyer. An invaluable asset is at stake: his surname. Decryption.

A bomb. The Edmond de Rothschild Group will sue the Paris branch, David de Rothschild, accused of 'pre-empt' the famous family -patronyme.

This is the first stunt Ariane de Rothschild, became President of the Executive Committee of the Edmond de Rothschild Group on 31 January. A recovery in family hands after the start of an external manager, Christophe de Backer. And the first time a woman runs a bank of the dynasty.

Benjamin's wife de Rothschild, son of Edmond, pilot his group from the shores of Lake Geneva, the nerve center for three generations. Far from the Avenue of Messina, the Paris headquarters of Rothschild & Cie, headed by David de Rothschild cousin and whose side holding, Paris Orleans, defines itself in its financial presentation as "parent Rothschild Group". The drop of water too.

Impairment misperceived

A first incident, a priori trivial, revealed the tension -régnait between houses. It is necessary to know that the two groups are cross 8% stake; Remember the boost given by Edmond de Rothschild when the young David went up a bank in Paris, after the nationalization of 1982. Since then, each year, accounting rules require to evaluate these investments. A mere formality.

But in late 2013, while Paris starts to rustle the depreciation of € 22 million spent by David because of bad business of his cousin Benjamin and his manager Christophe de Backer. The latter then breaks the silence. In the columns of the World, he speaks of "low blow". What will make a great noise. One year later, on both sides is minimized. And it emphasizes the "courteous distance" between institutions. Each home.

"Concordia, Integritas, Industria" Benjamin and David de Rothschild defend their common currency. To do good business, it is of course to be honest; but do not chip family harmony. Both men are somehow too different to compete. Aside from common ancestors, and some features of the family- elegance, blue eyes, penchant for philanthropy - they share little.

At 72, David de Rothschild reign with courtesy on mergers and acquisitions. Its "boutique" of the 1980s, he made a European empire financial advice. Benjamin de Rothschild, 51, weighs at least ten times more than his cousin with a fortune estimated by Challenges to 2.9 billion euros. Billionaire extraordinary, he plays with codes and can let his staff meeting last Christmas drink that "all those who left the group are enc ...".

Each character and each territory. The private Swiss bank side, the investment bank French side. But over the years, the two groups, however, made some inroads into the preserve of the other. Rothschild & Cie has developed management activities, while Edmond de -Rothschild maintains a small team of mergers and acquisitions and moved to the City, David's conquest of Earth Rothschild. This has in turn sought an adventure in Israel preserve of Benjamin.

Old grudges

Sign of the deterioration of relations, Rothschild & Cie has no administrator at Benjamin de Rothschild; which itself has not managed to get a seat at David. For deaf litigation divides the two groups. Off the record, on balance. Old jealousies?

As in all families, the Rothschilds carry around resentment. The younger branch, which resulted in Benjamin would feed an old complex with respect to the elder branch, that of David. And marriages would have helped. David de Rothschild married a perfect Italian aristocrat, while Edmund and his son Benjamin married commoners.

But near the two men swept the analysis: "David and Benjamin are well above that. The stakes are elsewhere. »

Elsewhere? We must therefore look towards the most valuable assets of the -dynastie: his surname. In Paris, Rothschild -David battled to get his name after the nationalization of the family bank. It was not until the arrival in power of Edouard Balladur for him to earn the right to use this magic name. We also had to agree with the younger branch.

Failure of mediation

By contract, each bank can be called Rothschild, provided they do not carry the name alone. Preceded by the name Edmond (carried by his father and great-grandfather) in Benjamin de Rothschild, is followed in the establishment founded by -David, the reference "& Cie". Thirty years later, discussions between the two families on the use of the mark were reopened.

But mediation failed. One of the objectives of Christophe de Backer, former HSBC, was to streamline the sign of his bank to facilitate its international expansion. But David preempted Rothschild Group, which nevertheless sounded good. The current battle is fought by the Queen of the heart of this chess game: Ariane de Rothschild, assisted by its General Secretary, Olivier Colom, a former diplomat.

Hosted by the duty to pass on to his four daughters a healthy and sustainable group, Benjamin's wife wants guarantees. What type? "The key to all this is the transmission. The great fear of Ariadne is that David's heirs ever be tempted to sell "decodes a lawyer.

Capital of shadows game

In an interview in May 2014 with his wife Point, Benjamin was also dropped: "We would like to especially avoid one day they sell their company with the name Rothschild. "A pretty stone in the garden cousins," who do not have the right to monopolize the name. " And the son of Edmond perspective the ongoing bickering: "For three generations there was friction between the different branches of the family. »

True, but rarely at this point. The concern of Rothschild Geneva -repose on one fact: the capital position of the Edmond de Rothschild Group is simpler than that of the bank's cousin. Benjamin is the sole heir to a lineage that had the good taste to generate, in every generation, an only son. It is rich and his own master.

The side of David, the situation is more collegial. In 2008, the bank was able to reunite two hundred years after their separation, the English and French branches. A master stroke.

But his son Alexander, its successor, will own a share of the capital alongside Eric de Rothschild, his cousin, and heirs of the English branch, the son of Evelyn. The heir must also reckon with the appetites of the managing partners who bring business.

A game of shadows to the delight of an officer of the historical competitor Lazard: "The acute crisis of succession that we have finally emerged after many years is looming at Rothschild ..." His comments "insane" t judge -on the side of Rothschild & Cie.