>>> Alliance Trust former chairman weighs in against activist Elliott Advisors

Alliance Trust former chairman weighs in against activist Elliott Advisors

Alliance Trust’s former chairperson, Lesley Knox, is supporting her successor, Katherine Garrett-Cox, against activist shareholder Elliott Advisors, The Sunday Telegraph reported.

Knox wrote to the newspaper expressing her scepticism that Elliott is a long-term investor and adding that a buyback proposed by the activist would be detrimental to other shareholders in the UK-listed investment company.

The ex-chair stressed that she is investing in Alliance Trust for the long term to fund her pension and is seeking certainty of returns rather than volatile performance and a high level of investment risk, the item reported.

Elliott is nominating three new non-executives to the board of Alliance Trust and the matter will be put to a vote at the company’s annual general meeting on 29 April, the report said, adding that Knox stated she will vote not to elect the three nominees.

Alliance Trust is hoping to persuade its shareholders not to vote for Elliott’s proposals, and the company’s position is strengthened by Knox’s comments, the report said.

Sunday Telegraph

WWD : The Kooples Said to Be Drawing Interest From Private Equity

PARIS — Hot French fashion chain The Kooples is the latest “affordable luxury” property to get private equity players into a lather.

According to sources, General Atlantic’s chief executive officer William E. Ford met with Kooples executives in Paris last month, and private equity fund Permira has also kicked the tires.

Reached on Thursday, Kooples ceo Nicolas Dreyfus told WWD he has met with many private equity funds that are attracted by the retailer’s strong results and growth prospects, confirming the meetings with General Atlantic and Permira. But he said there is no official sale process and no bank has been given a mandate to explore a possible sale.

Founded in 2008 by brothers Alexandre, Laurent and Raphael Elicha, The Kooples is ramping up expansion in the U.S. and tracking double-digit growth.

In a recent interview, Dreyfus said the brand was logging same-store sales growth of 9 percent in the U.S. and the brand was on track to finish its fiscal year ending Aug. 31 with sales of $28 million in the U.S. and Canada.

The company is forecasting total sales of 220 million euros, or $267.4 million at current exchange, this fiscal year, which represents 20 percent growth year-on-year in reported terms and a same-store sales increase of 9 percent.

Dreyfus predicted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of 38 million euros, or $46.2 million, for the period, and this will help fund the firm’s expansion.

In 2011, the Elichas sold a 20 percent stake in the company’s capital to private equity fund LBO France, the first of many transactions involving fast-growing French labels with a high fashion quotient and an “affordable luxury” positioning.

LBO declined to comment Thursday. It is understood the fund has also received expressions of interest, but not launched any formal process.

TA Associates acquired a 30 percent stake in Zadig & Voltaire in 2012, and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. bought a 65 percent stake in SMCP, parent of the Sandro, Maje and Claudie Pierlot chains, in 2013, signaling heightened investor interest in the segment.

Alongside BDT Capital Partners, General Atlantic made a minority investment in Tory Burch, an American fashion brand with attainable positioning, in late 2012.

The Kooples recently opened its fifth American boutique on SoHo’s Mercer Street, its second store in New York. The brand — whose preppy clothes have a rock ’n’ roll slant and are aimed at couples — is also carried by Saks Fifth Avenue and Nordstrom, as well as specialty stores.

The Kooples operates about 150 wholly owned stores in Europe and boasts a total of 360 sales points worldwide.

RTR - Holcim was interested in HeidelbergCement before Lafarge clipboard

Holcim was interested in HeidelbergCement before Lafarge clipboard

ZURICH, April 5 (Reuters) - Holcim studied late 2013 the possibility of a takeover bid for German HeidelbergCement before opting for its proposed merger with the French Lafarge, reported Sunday the Swiss newspaper SonntagsZeitung.

The then president of the Swiss cement, Rold Soiron, had contacts with the major shareholder of HeidelbergCement, Ludwig Merckle, said the Sunday paper on the basis of two sources.

"Just before his talks with Lafarge, Soiron discussed a merger with Heidelberg," said one of them. "Heidelberg has declined to blame proposal to obtain a merger of equals."

A spokesman for Holcim has declined to comment and HeidelbergCement could not be reached immediately.

The merger between Holcim and Lafarge, expected to create the world's biggest cement, was announced in April 2014 but was plunged into doubt in recent weeks, the Swiss party challenged the terms of the merger.

Holcim and Lafarge agreed to renegotiate a new exchange ratio of more favorable actions for the Swiss part but some investors, including Russian billionaire Filaret Galtchev second shareholder of the Swiss group with 10.8% of the capital, continue to challenge .

The uncertainty also concerns the choice of the Director General of the future group LafargeHolcim, Bruno Lafont, Lafarge's boss, who agreed under pressure to give up this position only to be non-executive co-chairman.

Holcim shareholders will vote on the project on May 8

In an interview published this weekend by the newspaper Le Monde, Bruno Lafont ensures that the merger "is not in danger."

>>> Israel PM Netanyahu: Reiterates opposition to Iran nuclear agreement as a "b

Israel PM Netanyahu: Reiterates opposition to Iran nuclear agreement as a "bad deal" that "endangers" Israel - CNN 
- Says: "It doesn't roll back Iran's nuclear program... It keeps a vast nuclear infrastructure in place. Not a single centrifuge is destroyed. Not a single nuclear facility is shut down, including the underground facilities that they built illicitly. Thousands of centrifuges will keep spinning enriching uranium. That's a bad deal.... I think it will also spark an arms race with the Sunni states."

>>> O2 CEO calls for EU reforms to enable cross-border mergers

O2 CEO calls for EU reforms to enable cross-border mergers 

O2 chief executive Ronan Dunne has called for reforms to European regulations, to enable cross-border merger deals which will progress European mobile networks, the Irish Examiner reported. Dunne said more mergers are required if Europe’s networks are to become as advanced as networks in North America.

Cross-border deals will facilitate investment into new mobile networks, as well as increasing use of wireless data, Dunne said. He added that UK-based O2’s Spanish owner Telefonica and other telecoms groups operating in a number of countries would then be well placed to consolidate smaller companies in the sector.

The current fragmentation of the market discourages acquirers, the CEO said.

The report noted that the GBP 10.25bn (EUR 13.95bn) sale of O2 to Hutchison Whampoa was agreed by Telefonica last week. The British company will be combined with Hutchison’s UK-based Three to create the country’s largest wireless operator.
Irish Examiner

FT : Million face 60% UK income tax ‘trap’

Million face 60% UK income tax ‘trap’

More than 1m UK taxpayers are expected to be caught in an income tax “trap” in less than four years, whereby those earning £100,000 a year lose their tax-free personal allowance and face a marginal rate of 60 per cent.
Under the coalition government, the number of people affected by this quirk in the tax system has risen by a third, from 588,000 in 2010-11 to a projected 791,000 in 2014-15, official figures show. If this trend continues, they will swell to 1.06m by 2018-19.

The situation arises because the tax-free personal allowance — currently set at £10,000 — tapers off for those with income above £100,000.
Since 2010, for every £2 earned above this threshold, £1 of the allowance is removed, meaning that high earners face an additional tax rate of 20 per cent (the “lower” tax rate) on up to £20,000 of income. This is on top of the “higher” rate of 40 per cent that they must pay above a threshold of £42,385 — for the tax year that has just begun.
Earnings between £100,000 and £120,000, therefore, face a marginal rate of 60 per cent.
“It makes what is otherwise a progressive income tax system regressive,” said Dermot Callinan, UK head of private client advisory at KPMG.
More taxpayers are now paying this 60 per cent rate as a result of the “fiscal drag” that sets wage inflation against the static £100,000 threshold.
Patricia Mock, a tax director at Deloitte, pointed out that as the personal allowance had risen from £6,475 in 2010 so the band of income on which this 60 per cent effective rate was paid had widened. The tax-free allowance is set to rise further — to £11,000 by 2017-18, meaning income between £100,000 and £122,000 will be affected.
Ms Mock said the de facto 60 per cent rate was quite hard to address: “You could have a cliff edge for the personal allowance, but that would arguably be less fair than a taper.”
George Bull, senior tax partner for Baker Tilly, said the anomaly was regarded as “a bit of a trap”, adding: “Politically, there is a sense it’s a price that higher-paid individuals have to pay as part of a fairness agenda.”
Mr Callinan said the issue encouraged people to “look more closely at their personal pensions contributions”.
Taxpayers in this position who put an extra £1,000 into their pension pot, before tax, can do so at a net cost of £400. The removal of the personal allowance also makes it beneficial for bonuses to be paid over more than one tax year, and makes charitable giving attractive. Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, said many people earning just under £100,000 took such measures.
The share of overall income tax paid by higher earners has increased significantly during this parliament.
The total paid by those earning above £100,000 is projected to rise to £63.9bn in 2014-15, according to HM Revenue & Customs, up from £47.3bn in 2010-11.
This represents an increase in their share of total contributions from 31 to 38 per cent.

WSJ : Can Music Change the Way Your Wine Tastes?

Can Music Change the Way Your Wine Tastes?
Studies show music can influence which wines you buy and how they taste when you’re drinking them. Lettie Teague conducts a few nonscientific experiments of her own
I WENT WINE SHOPPING recently in New Jersey. Bruce Springsteen was playing on the store’s sound system—naturally. The Boss is an inescapable musical presence in his home state. Why not in a wine shop? But maybe because “Glory Days” isn’t one of my favorites (my tastes, Bruce-wise, tend toward “Thunder Road”), I found the music distracting. Instead of focusing on the Chablis selection, I was rifling through alternate Springsteen tunes in my head. Was this really what the retailer wanted me to do?

Several studies produced over the past couple of decades demonstrate how music can influence the wines people buy—and even how a wine’s taste is perceived. A 1999 study by members of the psychology department at the University of Leicester, published in the Journal of Applied Psychology, analyzed 82 wine buyers in a suburban English supermarket. The team found that when shoppers heard French music in the store, French wine outsold German wine by a ratio of five to one. Likewise, when German music was playing, German wines sold well. (No mention was made of California wines, but maybe Beach Boys music was hard for an English supermarket to track down.)

Adrian North, now head of psychology at Curtin University in Perth, Australia, coauthored this study. In 2010, he conducted another while he was a professor at the Heriot-Watt University, in Edinburgh, that combined drinking wine and listening to various types of music. Professor North recruited 125 men and 125 women, all under age 25, to drink Chilean Cabernet and Chilean Chardonnay while listening to four types of music.


The music ranged from powerful and heavy to mellow and soft, played briefly while participants tasted the wines. For readers who might want to try this experiment at home, the powerful and heavy music was Carl Orff’s cantata “Carmina Burana”; the subtle and refined piece was Tchaikovsky’s “Waltz of the Flowers”; a Nouvelle Vague cover of Depeche Mode’s “Just Can’t Get Enough” fit the “zingy and refreshing” category; and “Slow Breakdown,” by Michael Brook, was the mellow and soft selection.

It turned out the music did have a measurable impact on the impression of the wine: When lively music was playing, the group overwhelmingly found the wine to be lively, and when powerful music was playing, the wine seemed powerful as well. When the music was mellow and soft, the participants found the same qualities in their glasses.

These studies certainly seemed to demonstrate that music could influence how people perceived or purchased a particular wine or type of wine. But did the findings hold true in everyday life? Does music influence the way wine tastes and smells for most wine drinkers? Does playing certain music really put people in the mood to buy certain types of wine, or is it really just a background soundtrack that you either like or dislike?

I decided to ask some wine professionals I know who are equally passionate about music and wine. My first call was to David Stevens, a wine merchant by day and rock musician by night. Mr. Stevens and his wife, Monica, own 750 Wines in St. Helena, Calif., and Mr. Stevens plays in a band with several Napa winemakers. The Stevenses consider music so important, it’s one of nine topics on a questionnaire they send private clients when scheduling a tasting. (Other questions poll standard predilections such as favorite wines and price range.) What is the most common musical preference? “Classic rock,” said Mr. Stevens. And the least? “I think we’ve had one group ask for opera.”

Mr. Stevens said if clients like the music playing, they might be inclined to like the wine they’re tasting, too, and he thinks people respond to music they are comfortable with, or “what they were brought up on.” Music also helps bring their guard down, noted Mr. Stevens, and that probably makes them more receptive to buying. Was there any music that didn’t have that effect? “Hip-hop would be totally distracting,” he said.

And yet at Charlie Bird in New York, which has one of the city’s best wine lists, partner Robert Bohr plays hip-hop almost exclusively. As far as he’s concerned, hip-hop can only improve the taste of a wine. “Hip-hop makes me happy so I’m probably liking the wine more when I’m listening to it,” said Mr. Bohr, who also manages private wine collections. At least at Charlie Bird, hip-hop doesn’t have the effect Mr. Stevens predicted. Last time I dined there, a room full of talkative, wine-drinking diners effectively drowned out the music.

And then there is City Winery, where wine and music are on equal footing. A restaurant, winery and music space, City Winery was founded in 2008 in Manhattan by owner Michael Dorf, who went on to open three more locations in Chicago, Napa and Nashville.

“I believe there is a direct correlation between the music in your ears and the wine in your glass,” Mr. Dorf said. He’s even editing a book on pairing wine and music that will be published later this summer. A sample entry from the book pairs Al Green with Amarone della Valpolicella, the big, rich red from Veneto, Italy. “If Al Green were to sing a wine into existence, you’d better believe it would be this deliciously smooth Amarone,” reads the text.

Mr. Dorf cited some real ways he’s seen music influence customers’ choices of wine. “With bands with a heavy bass line, we’ll sell more Syrah and more California Cabernets,” he said. When bands with a “higher tone” play, sales of white wine go up.

Mr. Dorf has noticed other correlations. For example, when singer-songwriters such as Steve Earle or Suzanne Vega play, New World wines—from places like California and Oregon—sell very well. Older bluegrass musicians tend to move Old World wines, from Italy and France. There was one exception to these rules: “In Chicago, they drink everything,” said Mr. Dorf. “They skew the results.”

Mark Snyder owns Angels’ Share, a New York-based wine distributor, and is the founder of Brooklyn’s Red Hook Winery. He’s also a classically trained guitarist who once toured with Peter Frampton and Ringo Starr and still works with Billy Joel. Did Mr. Snyder think music influenced a taster’s perception of wine? He said he could draw associations and justifications for why a piece of music might fit a wine. (“It’s light on its feet, it’s bright,” he offered, as if making a note of a wine or a piece of music.) But he eschewed directives such as “Drink Chianti with Billy Joel” or “Bordeaux is good with Chopin,” saying it would be like “telling someone what to feel when they looked at a painting.”

I sought the opinion of one more person: musician and vintner Boz Scaggs. I figured a man who had both a vineyard in Napa and multiplatinum albums might have some valuable insight.

I caught up with Mr. Scaggs just before his new album, “A Fool to Care,” made its debut earlier this week. Did he think music could influence how someone perceived a wine? “I don’t see why not,” replied Mr. Scaggs. Could he be more definitive? “There might be a bottle of Châteauneuf-du-Pape that goes well with my outlook on life,” he offered, which didn’t exactly answer my question. Had Mr. Scaggs ever tasted his own wine listening to his own music and found one tune made it taste one way and one song another way? He had not.

I decided to try it myself. I bought a bottle of the 2009 Scaggs Vineyard Mt. Veeder Montage ($45), a red Rhône-style blend of Mourvèdre, Grenache and Syrah. Then I downloaded a couple of songs from his 1976 album, “Silk Degrees,” and served the wine (label concealed) to three friends.

We tasted it with the first and second songs. Everyone agreed the character of the wine was soft and approachable but possessed a some-what short finish, although my friend Richard said the first song (the famous and funky but relatively slow “Lowdown”) made the wine seem a bit simple. My friend Marilyn agreed, while the last taster, Robin, found the opposite to be true. Richard further opined that the second Boz Scaggs tune (“It’s Over,” an up-tempo heartbreak song) made the wine “more complete” and made the finish seem less abrupt. We re-tasted the wine. I thought Richard was right—the emotion of the song seemed to fill the wine out.

Perhaps our little exercise didn’t prove much beyond a certain subjective truth: When wine and music are combined, the reaction is an entirely personal one. For example, according to Gary Fisch, owner of Gary’s Wines & Marketplace in Wayne, N.J., where I heard that Bruce tune, Springsteen is the music his customers prefer. “That’s the generation of the customers,” he said. Mr. Fisch agreed that music definitely influenced shopping behavior, or in his case, shopping avoidance. “There are some stores I won’t shop in because I hate the music,” he said.

WSJ : Sharp Seeks to Spin Off LCD Panel Unit

Sharp Seeks to Spin Off LCD Panel Unit

Troubled Japanese electronics provider plans to ask government-supported investment fund for help

TOKYO—Sharp Corp., the troubled Japanese electronics provider, is moving to spin off part of its panel-making unit and plans to ask a government-supported investment fund for help, several people familiar with the matter said.

The unit to be spun off makes small- and medium-size liquid crystal display screens for smartphones. Demand for the screens is growing, but Sharp has struggled to compete with South Korean providers such as LG Display and domestic rival Japan Display Inc., which has been marketing its panels aggressively to makers of low-cost handsets in China.

As part of the plan, Sharp is seeking a capital injection from Innovation Network Corp. of Japan, a fund overseen by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry that was created to support the country’s electronics industry. The fund previously invested in Japan Display, which was created from a merger of panel operations of several other Japanese electronics giants.

A Sharp spokesman said the company is considering various restructuring options including those for the panel business, but “has not made any decisions.”

Sharp hopes the spinoff plan, along with staff reductions and other cost cuts, will help secure new financial aid from lenders. The banks already hold more than ¥600 billion ($5 billion) in Sharp debt.

Sharp said in February it would post a loss of ¥30 billion, instead of the ¥30 billion profit it had previously expected, for the business year ended March 31. Along with the panel business, Sharp’s domestic consumer electronics business has struggled of late. It has been hurt by the weak yen, because much of what it sells in Japan it makes overseas.

Sharp is putting the finishing touches on the broader restructuring and plans to unveil it in May. But a person familiar with the situation said the company might announce the spinoff before then.

Sharp hopes to retain control of its panel-making business even after cash injections by external parties, but analysts say the step could be a prelude to industrywide consolidation, especially if Innovation Network Corp. gets involved. When the fund spearheaded the creation of Japan Display in 2012 from LCD units of Sony Corp., Hitachi Ltd. and Toshiba Corp., Sharp declined to join.

Besides the Japanese fund, Foxconn—the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer officially known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.—has been exploring investment and partnership opportunities possibly involving Sharp. The Japanese company has said the door is open, but under a previous commitment to purchase Sharp’s shares at ¥550 a share. They closed Friday at ¥231.

FT : Boost for Uber as Brussels considers regulation of ride sharing

Boost for Uber as Brussels considers regulation of ride sharing

Uber has received a boost in its struggle to overcome regulatory barriers after the European Commission gave the clearest indication yet that it is considering ways to regulate the ride-sharing service at a European rather than national level.
Plans for an in-depth study into the European taxi market to “provide the necessary background for the commission to decide on the need for — and possible character of — any further action at EU level” emerged in a private letter from the commissioner for transport.

The commission, which received complaints from Uber after it was banned in France and Germany, told the FT it supported the development of new and innovative mobility services.
While services such as Uber should not circumvent national rules, member states have to respect the general principles of EU law such as proportionality, non-discrimination and freedom of establishment, the commission said.
Uber has endured a rocky regulatory ride since launching in Europe in 2012, with its drivers facing fines or having their cars impounded. While it is legal in some countries, such as the UK, in others it operates in a “grey” market, where its legality is unclear.
The letter was sent from Violeta Bulc, who oversees transport regulation, to the chairman of the European Parliament’s transport committee. In it, the commissioner said that taxi regulations were “currently” dealt with at a national level, which had led to variances in the cost and service of taxis as well as inconsistent rules on Uber within the single market.
Ms Bulc wrote: “As a result, the regulation and market situation differs from one member state to another and even from one city to another”.
In Amsterdam, Uber’s European headquarters, the authorities raided the taxi app’s office late last month, questioning staff for more than six hours.
UberPOP, the low-cost service that lets drivers use their private cars to pick up riders, is banned in the country, which has led to Uber racking up €100,000 of fines — the maximum allowed under Dutch law.
Violent disputes between Uber drivers and licensed taxi drivers have flared up across Europe, with Uber drivers being attacked in some cities.
In Brussels, where UberPOP is illegal, some Uber drivers refuse to pick up passengers near taxi ranks in case taxi drivers vandalise their car or report them to the police.
The San Francisco-based group has fought back in recent months, lodging complaints with the commission aimed at the French, German and Spanish governments, which have tried to limit or ban the service.
In France last week, a court granted Uber a reprieve by referring the case to the country’s highest appeal court, meaning that the company’s UberPOP drivers could continue to operate in the interim.
The regulation of US technology groups in Europe has come under increased scrutiny in recent months after President Barack Obama accused the European regulators of protectionism.

>>>> Anker’s Jump Starter Portable Charger brings cars and iPhones back to life

Anker’s Jump Starter Portable Charger brings cars and iPhones back to life in emergencies

jumpstarter-1

Anker specializes in accessories that deliver uncommon value. Like gigantic batteries that cost as little as small ones. Six-port USB chargers that are less expensive than two Apple one-port chargers. And iPhone battery cases that outperform rivals sold for twice the price. So it’s only natural that the company would leverage its power expertise to go beyond resuscitating little Apple devices and assist with real emergencies. With roughly the same footprint as its Astro E7 — a battery capable of fully recharging any iPad Air twice — the same-priced Jump Starter Portable Charger ($80) goes in a slightly different direction. You still get a pretty big 10,000mAh battery that can charge two Apple devices at once, but instead of E7’s third USB port, Anker includes jumper cables that can bring dead cars back to life.

Like all of the Anker products I’ve covered, Jump Starter is thoughtfully designed, efficiently packaged, and aggressively priced relative to competing products. Moreover, unlike some of the cobbled-together 3-in-1 accessories I’ve tested, its feature set actually addresses a related collection of problems a driver may have. But it’s not as much of an iPad-charging powerhouse as Astro E7; it’s best-suited to iPhone users. So is it the right battery pack for you? Read on…



Key Details:

Hard plastic box contains the battery, jumper cables, and chargers for home and auto use
10,000mAh cell recharges iPad Air almost once, iPhone twice
Twin USB ports can handle two devices at one time (slowly)
12V/400-Amp output can bring most car batteries back to life
Powerful flashlight can be used as a strobing emergency signal

jumpstarter-7

Most of Anker’s accessories come in nice cardboard packages that I really appreciate for their minimalism and recyclability. Jump Starter takes the same concept further by not requiring you to dispose of anything: the packaging is a solid, latch-shut plastic box that can keep all or some of the included pieces safe in your car, with a handle for easy transportation. Combined with the roughly 6.8″ by 3″ by 1.2″ Jump Starter battery itself, which has been ruggedized with hard matte plastic and rubber bumpers, there’s a very good chance that the components here will look very close to new after extended use.

jumpstarter-6

By contrast with Anker’s Astro E7, which includes only a battery, drawstring carrying case, and micro-USB cable, Jump Starter includes a 1-Amp wall power adapter, a 0.8-Amp car power adapter, and jumper cables, plus a micro-USB cable and the aforementioned box. These extra components substantially explain why Jump Starter’s battery is 10,000mAh versus the same-priced Astro E7’s 25,600mAh cell; a separate version sold for $10 more bumps the power up to 12,000mAh if you need the extra juice. One of my only two Jump Starter gripes: both of the included power adapters are lower-powered than they could be, so Jump Starter requires 3-4 hours to recharge using its circular 1-Amp power input. By comparison, Astro E7 recharges at 2-Amp speeds and uses a more common micro-USB connector.

jumpstarter-5

Unless you have a car with a finicky battery that you’re not planning to replace, most of Jump Starter’s use will be with USB-connected devices, and even for this purpose, it’s better-equipped than many $80 USB batteries. Anker’s 10,000mAh cell has enough energy to fully recharge any iPhone (including the iPhone 6 Plus, shown for size comparison purposes below) twice, with smaller iPhones recharging roughly three times. If you’re planning to use Jump Starter only for emergencies, that’s enough iPhone power to last for a full day of active calling, more than enough talk time to get out of most emergency situations.

jumpstarter-2

On the other hand, Jump Starter’s iPad performance isn’t as amazing. I tested it with a completely discharged first-generation iPad Air, and found that it was able to restore 97% power — very close to a full recharge. The iPad Air 2 will receive a full recharge with a little juice left over. But even though one of the two USB ports promises iPad-friendly 2.1-Amp output, versus the other at 1-Amp output for iPhones, both ports actually ran at 1-Amp speeds. It took the better part of a day to recharge the iPad Air using Jump Starter, which definitely is not the case with Astro E7.

jumpstarter-10

Anker did significantly upgrade one element found in Astro E7 and a surprising number of other USB batteries: the flashlight. I often feel that LED flashlights built into batteries are gimmicky — a “feature creep” item that companies include because they can, rather than for a defined purpose. But Jump Starter’s flashlight has an obvious virtue in emergency situations, particularly if you discover that your car battery’s dead at night. As shown below, Anker has boosted the light’s power significantly over Astro E7, enabling it to serve as a very bright and large source of illumination; tapping the unit’s power button lets you cycle through solid light and two speeds of emergency strobing. Again, it’s a thoughtful and practical little bonus feature.

jumpstarter-9

Jump Starter’s signature feature is its ability to jump start a car, and though there are caveats, it’s capable of handling common situations. When you connect the included jumper cables, it switches automatically from the 5V/1A and 2.1A output needed by Apple devices to the 12V/400Amp output needed to start cars, with what Anker says is enough energy (when fully charged) to jump start 3-Liter gas or 2.5-Liter diesel engines 10 or more times. It’s also worth noting that only one of its four blue bars (25% power remaining) needs to be filled for Jump Starter to work, which means that you needn’t worry about topping it off every day or week; the included car charger can be used for this purpose if you’re concerned. A light on the charger lets you know that it’s ready to go.

jumpstarter-4

I waited for a car battery failure for two months before reviewing this unit, and (unfortunately?) wasn’t able to test the feature myself. But the consensus from Amazon reviewers has been extremely positive, including reports of successfully jumpstarting everything from four wheelers to small and mid-sized cars with both this unit and its larger brother. Big trucks can be charged as well, though they’ll drain Jump Starter’s power reserves faster. A relatively small number of people have had jumper cable length issues with specific vehicles, but with an overall rating of 4.7/5 stars, the satisfaction levels here are high. If your car battery looks like the one shown in the photo below, the cable length should be fine.

jumpstarter-8

If I was personally picking between Anker’s Astro E7 and Jump Starter batteries purely for iPad use, Astro E7 would certainly be the easier choice: it delivers more Apple device recharging power at faster speeds for the same price point, while possessing a nearly identical footprint and markedly less thickness. But Jump Starter isn’t just an iPad battery. Users in need of a true “on the road emergency” battery will find everything they might need: the ability to bring a car back to life, enough spare power (and speed) to refuel a dead or dying iPhone, and a good flashlight with the option of signaling flashes. You can select the option that’s best for your personal needs, but if jump starting a car is one of them, the right choice is obvious.

Manufacturer:
Anker Price:
$80 Compatibility:
All iPads,* iPhones, USB iPods