(BFW) BC Partners-Led Consortium to Buy PetSmart for $8.7 Billion


BFW 12/14 21:12 *BC PARTNERS-LED CONSORTIUM TO BUY PETSMART FOR $8.7 BILLION
BN 12/14 21:12 *BC PARTNERS-LED CONSORTIUM TO BUY PETSMART FOR $8.7 BILLION

BC Partners-Led Consortium to Buy PetSmart for $8.7 Billion
2014-12-14 21:15:50.209 GMT


By Dan Hart
(Bloomberg) -- Group to pay $83-shr in cash representing
~39% over July 2 closing price, acquiring group says in
statement.
* Statement: {NSN NGLC1CMEQTXC <GO>}

Link to Company News:{2496Z LN <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{PETM US <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the reporter on this story:
Dan Hart in Washington at +1-202-624-1870 or
dahart@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
John Simpson at +1-416-203-5726 or
jsimpson12@bloomberg.net

>>> Crude Crash Set To Continue After Arab Emirates Hint $40 Oil

Crude Crash Set To Continue After Arab Emirates Hint $40 Oil Coming Next
In space, no one can hear you scream... unless you happen to be Venezuela's (soon to be former) leader Nicolas Maduro, who has been doing a lot of screaming this morning following news that UAE's Energy Minister Suhail Al-Mazrouei said OPEC will stand by its decision not to cut crude output "even if oil prices fall as low as $40 a barreland will wait at least three months before considering an emergency meeting.
In doing so, OPEC not only confirms that the once mighty cartel is essentially non-existant and has been replaced by the veto vote of the lowest-cost exporters (again, sorry Maduro), but that all those energy hedge funds (and not only) who hoped that by allowing margin calls to go straight to voicemail on Friday afternoon, their troubles would go away because of some magical intervention by OPEC over the weekend, are about to have a very unpleasant Monday, now that the next oil price bogey has been set: $40 per barrell.
Luckily, this will be so "unambiguously good" for the US consumer, it should surely offset the epic capex destruction that is about to be unleashed on America's shale patch, in junk bond hedge funds around the globe, and as millions of high-paying jobs created as a result of the shale miracle are pink slipped.
According to Bloomberg, OPEC won’t immediately change its Nov. 27 decision to keep the group’s collective output target unchanged at 30 million barrels a day, Suhail Al-Mazrouei said. Venezuela supports an OPEC meeting given the price slide, though the country hasn’t officially requested one, an official at Venezuela’s foreign ministry said Dec. 12. The group is due to meet again on June 5. 
“We are not going to change our minds because the prices went to $60 or to $40,” Mazrouei told Bloomberg at a conference in Dubai. “We’re not targeting a price; the market will stabilize itself.” He said current conditions don’t justify an extraordinary OPEC meeting. “We need to wait for at least a quarter” to consider an urgent session, he said.
And with OPEC’s 12 members pumped 30.56 million barrels a day in November, exceeding their collective target for a sixth straight month, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait this month deepened discounts on shipments to Asia, feeding speculation that they’re fighting for market share amid a glut fed by surging U.S. shale production.
The above only focuses on the (unchanged) supply side of the equation - and since the entire world is rolling over into yet another round of global recession, following not only a Chinese slowdown to a record low growth rate, but also a recession in both Japan and Europe, the just as important issue is where demand will be in the coming year. The answer:much lower.
OPEC's unchanged production level, a lower demand growth forecast from the International Energy Agency further put the skids under oil on Friday, raising concerns of possible broader negative effects such as debt defaults by companies and countries heavily exposed to crude prices. There was also talk of the price trend adding to deflation pressures in Europe, increasing bets that the European Central Bank will be forced to resort to further stimulus early next year.
And while the bankruptcy advisors and "fondos buitre" as they are known in Buenos Aires, are circling Venezuela whose default is essentially just a matter of day, OPEC is - just in case its plan to crush higher cost production fails - doing a little of the "good cop" routing as a Plan B.
According to Reuters, OPEC secretary general tried to moderate the infighting within the oil exporters, saying "OPEC can ride out a slump in oil prices and keep output unchanged, arguing market weakness did not reflect supply and demand fundamentals and could have been driven by speculators."
Ah yes, it had been a while since we heard the good old "evil speculators" excuse. Usually it appeared when crude prices soared. Now, it has re-emerged to explain the historic plunge of crude.
Speaking at a conference in Dubai, Abdullah al-Badri defended November's decision by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries to not cut its output target of 30 million barrels per day (bdp) in the face of a drop in crude prices to multi-year lows.

 

"We agreed that it is important to continue with production (at current levels) for the ... coming period. This decision was made by consensus by all ministers," he said. "The decision has been made. Things will be left as is."

 

Some say selling may continue as few participants are yet willing to call a bottom for markets.
There is some hope for the falling knife catchers: "Badri suggested the crude price fall had been overdone. "The fundamentals should not lead to this dramatic reduction (in price)," he said in Arabic through an English interpreter. He said only a small increase in supply had lead to a sharp drop in prices, adding: "I believe that speculation has entered strongly in deciding these prices.""
Unfortunately for the crude longs, Badri is lying, as can be gleaned from the following statement:
Badri said OPEC sought a price level that was suitable and satisfactory both for consumers and producers, but did not specify a figure. The OPEC chief also said November's decision was not aimed at any other oil producer, rebutting suggestions it was intended to either undermine the economics of U.S. shale oil production or weaken rival powers closer to home.

 

"Some people say this decision was directed at the United States and shale oil. All of this is incorrect. Some also say it was directed at Iran and Russia. This also is incorrect," he said.
Well actually... "Saudi Arabia's oil minister Ali al-Naimi had told last month's OPEC meeting the organization must combat the U.S. shale oil boom, arguing for maintaining output to depress prices and undermine the profitability of North American producers, said a source who was briefed by a non-Gulf OPEC minister."
And as Europe has shown repeatedly, not only is it serious when you have to lie, but it is even worse when you can't remember what lies you have said in the past. That alone assures that the chaos within OPEC - if only for purely optical reasons - will only get worse and likely lead to least a few sovereign defaults as the petroleum exporting organization mutates to meet the far lower demand levels of the new normal.
In the meantime, the only question is how much longer can stocks ignore the bloodbath in energy (where there has been much interstellar screaming too) because as we showed on Friday, despite the worst week for stocks in 3 years, equities have a long way to go if and when they finally catch up, or rather down, with the crude reality...

Recode.net : FBI: Iran Hackers May Target U.S. Energy, Defense Firms

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has warned U.S. businesses to be on the alert for a sophisticated Iranian hacking operation whose targets include defense contractors, energy firms and educational institutions, according to a confidential agency document.

The operation is the same as one flagged last week by cyber security firm Cylance Inc as targeting critical infrastructure organizations worldwide, cyber security experts said. Cylance has said it uncovered more than 50 victims from what it dubbed Operation Cleaver, in 16 countries, including the United States.

The FBI’s confidential “Flash” report, seen by Reuters on Friday, provides technical details about malicious software and techniques used in the attacks, along with advice on thwarting the hackers. It asked businesses to contact the FBI if they believed they were victims.

Cylance Chief Executive Stuart McClure said the FBI warning suggested that the Iranian hacking campaign may have been larger than its own research revealed. “It underscores Iran’s determination and fixation on large-scale compromise of critical infrastructure,” he said.

The FBI’s technical document said the hackers typically launch their attacks from two IP addresses that are in Iran, but did not attribute the attacks to the Tehran government. Cylance has said it believes Iran’s government is behind the campaign, a claim Iran has vehemently denied.

An FBI official did not provide further details, but said the agency routinely provides private industry with advisories to help it fend off cyber threats.

The Pentagon and National Security Agency had no immediate comment.

Tehran has been substantially increasing investment in its cyber capabilities since 2010, when its nuclear program was hit by the Stuxnet computer virus, widely believed to have been launched by the United States and Israel.

Cyber security professionals who investigate cyber attacks said that they are seeing evidence that Iran’s investment is paying off.

“They are good and have a lot of talent in the country,” said Dave Kennedy, CEO of TrustedSEC LLC. “They are definitely a serious threat, no question.”

Iranian hackers are increasingly being blamed for sophisticated cyberattacks.

Bloomberg Businessweek on Thursday reported that Iranian hacker activists were responsible for a devastating February 2014 attack on casino operator Las Vegas Sands Corp, which crippled thousands of servers by wiping them with destructive malware. It said the hackers sought to punish Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson for comments he made about detonating a nuclear bomb in Iran.

(BFW) CGG Board Found None of Technip Proposals Created Value for Co.


CGG Board Found None of Technip Proposals Created Value for Co.
2014-12-14 20:03:10.398 GMT


By John Simpson
(Bloomberg) -- CGG says it was open to dialogue with
Technip after unsolicited approach on Nov. 10, but determined
that none of the proposed options “were creating value for the
company and its shareholders.”
* CGG says it remains confident in its future as an
independent co., noting that 3Q results show “important
progresses achieved and milestones met” and balance sheet
strengthened
* Says it is in position to “weather current difficult market
conditions while fully benefiting from future geoscience
market rebound”
* NOTE: Earlier, Technip Doesn’t Intend to File a Tender Offer
for CGG Link
Link to Statement:Link
Link to Company News:CGG FP <Equity> CN <GO>
Link to Company News:TEC FP <Equity> CN <GO>

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
John Simpson at +1-416-203-5726 or
jsimpson12@bloomberg.net

WWD : Pambianco Study: Armani, Zegna, Dolce & Gabbana Best Suited for IPOs

Pambianco Study: Armani, Zegna, Dolce & Gabbana Best Suited for IPOs

MILAN — Investors thirsty for a piece of Italian fashion and design could have many enticing options to choose from if only Italy’s entrepreneurs were a bit less averse to the stock market.

Closely-held Giorgio Armani, Gianni Versace, Missoni and Renzo Rosso’s OTB — among others — all have the necessary qualifications for successful stock market listings, according to research by Pambianco Strategie di Impresa, which Thursday published its fourth annual report on the 50 most “listable” Italian fashion and luxury goods firms.

While there are about a dozen new entries (and an equivalent number of departures) the list remains anchored around what Pambianco president Carlo Pambianco called a “hard core” of 29 firms, which have been in the list each year. (These, however, don’t seem inclined to make the jump from “listable” to listed.)

During a conference held at Italy’s Stock Exchange to present the research, Pambianco said the firms on the top-50 list could be ready for an initial public offering within three to five years.

Unsurprisingly, Giorgio Armani came in at the top of the list for the second year in a row, followed by Ermenegildo Zegna (which recently announced the separation of its real estate unit, leading to some speculation that it might be gearing up for a listing — promptly squashed by the men’s wear giant) and Dolce & Gabbana. Armani certainly is the juggernaut in the group, with 2013 sales of 2.2 billion euros, or $2.7 billion at current exchange, almost twice number-two-ranked Zegna’s 1.3 billion euros, or $1.6 billion.

Rounding out the top five most “listable” firms are — also in the same positions as last year — cosmetics retailer Kiko and high-end men’s wear maker Stefano Ricci.

Aside from fashion, Pambianco issued its second 15 most “listable” design firms, which uses the same ranking criteria as the fashion and luxury goods top 50. The top three spots this year go to Flos (second in 2013), Kartell (first in 2013) and B&B Italia (same as last year). Other famous design names, including Artemide, Minotti and Poliform, were reconfirmed, while Arper (in 7th place) and Trend (13th) are newcomers.

Pambianco explained that the methodology used to create the rankings is based on assigning points to eight factors — including sales and profitability growth, brand awareness, company size and distribution network reach. Based on a maximum possible score of 100, in the fashion and luxury goods rankings, Armani scored 81.4 points, Zegna scored 79.8 and Dolce & Gabbana came in with 76.5.

While most companies were repeats, new entries include Corneliani, Valentino, Pinko and Trussardi. Brands including Slowear, Santoni, Marcolin and Alviero Martini were left out this year.

Luca Peyrano, head of capital markets at Borsa Italiana, said there was great interest on the part of foreign investors in “made in Italy.” The last four fashion-luxury goods listings in Milan raised a combined 1.2 billion euros, or $1.5 billion, while investors demanded shares worth up to 25 billion euros, or $31 billion, he said, adding: “I can’t think of a single better reason to list on the stock market.”

If all the 65 companies in the two Pambianco rankings (fashion and design) sought stock market listings they would likely raise more than 12 billion euros, or $15 billion, and have a combined market capitalization of more than 40 billion euros, or $50 billion, he said. “We [Milan] could become the stock market with the highest level of attractiveness for listings in the sector.”

Giovanni Tinuper, a PWC partner who collaborated with Pambianco on the research, said that Italy’s fashion, luxury goods and design industries are worth some 65 billion euros, or $81 billion, in annual sales and generate more than 600,000 jobs.

Despite the obvious advantages of a stock market listing — not only in terms of raising capital, but also in terms of brand awareness and access to high-quality managerial skills — Italian entrepreneurs seem to remain mostly averse to the Bourse. Some apparently think it is too challenging for their companies, some fear handing over control to outsiders. “We know the word ‘listing’ generates anxiety in entrepreneurs,” said Peyrano, joking, as he pointed out that — while being a fairly disciplinary process — preparations for IPOs are not necessarily more complex than selling shares to private equity funds. “We would like the ‘hard core’ to soften up a bit, to go from ‘listable’ to listed.”

Peyrano explained that Borsa Italiana’s Elite program is designed “to help firms open up to outside capital, through stock market listings, but also by preparing them for sales to private equity, for debt offerings and even for mergers and acquisitions.”

One entrepreneur at the event, Domenico Menniti, head of fashion brand Harmont & Blaine, which recently opened its capital to a private equity firm and aims for a stock market listing sometime around the end of 2017 or early 2018, said that the Elite program is “hard work” and “lacks psychological support.” He said that for firms considering a listing, it was “worrying” to see how a company like Tod’s SpA’s shares could be hammered over the past year “for no clear reason.” Peyrano retorted that Tod’s owner Diego Della Valle “is probably very calm. He’s already been through periods where his company’s shares were overvalued and undervalued with respect to the fundamentals.” The important thing, he said, is to have a medium to long-term view.

In the end, however, above all it’s about ambition. If a company is happy with sales of some 1.5 to 2 billion euros, or $1.9 to $2.5 billion, “then, as an entrepreneur, I’m settling for second best,” Peyrano said, adding: “It’s not so much a question of necessity, but of entrepreneurship, of growing abroad and giving myself the tools which will allow me to break into foreign markets, grow and increase my profitability.”

One firm thinking about an IPO is women’s wear and accessories maker Kocca, ranked 47th in this year’s top 50, the same position as last year. Based in Nola, near Naples, not far from Harmont & Blaine, chief executive Andrea Miranda told WWD the company has almost completed the Elite program and is considering whether to open its capital to private equity funds (“we get contacted frequently”) or to list. “If we do list, our main aim would be to raise funds for international growth and we would definitely list in Italy,” Miranda said. Kocca will end 2014 with around 55 million euros, or $68 million, in sales and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of around 15 percent. By 2017, Miranda said he sees sales hitting a maximum of 75 million euros, or $93 million.

Meanwhile, another Italian brand — leather goods maker Fedon — is soon to list its shares on Milan’s AIM market for small and medium-size companies, Pambianco News reported Wednesday. Fedon is not new to the stock market: The company has been listed on Paris Euronext since 1988. The dual listing would serve also to increase the brand’s visibility.

>>> What to look at this Week End ( 13th & 14th of Dec. )


Macro :
- OPEC El-Badri: OPEC has no set price for oil; Failure by members to invest may push the prices back above $100/brl again 
- Abe Faces Policy Balancing Act After Commanding Election Victory
- United Kingdom Affirmed at AA+ By Fitch
- ECB Poised to Move to QE in Early 2015, S&P Economists Reiterate
- Greece Close to Exiting Bailout Program: Samaras in Real News
- ECB's Weidmann (Germany): Risk of spiralling deflation is very low; Current falling prices due to energy-cost decrease
- Qatar Stocks Enter Bear Market as Dubai Erases 2014 Gains on Oil

Keep an eye on :
- AIR FP : Airbus to Hand Over First A350 to Qatar on Dec. 22, Cos. Say
- ALV GY : Manulife & Allianz to Co-Invest Up to $1b in U.S. Real Estate
- ALO FP : Alstom’s Kron Seen as Possible Candidate for Sanofi Top Job: JDD
- O2C GY : C.A.T. Oil Says Bid Document Contains Errors
- CGG FP : Technip Doesn’t Intend to File a Tender Offer for CGG
- CBK GY : Commerzbank to Raise Prices for Corporate Clients: Handelsblatt
- GET FP : Eurostar attracts offers from CIC and GIC
- ICAD FP : Icade sells 36 Mr. Bricolage stores to Tikehau Capital for EUR 126m
- KER FP : Kering appoints Marco Bizzarri as CEO of Gucci; seeks new creative director
- LHA GY : Lufthansa Board Split on Future of Core Business, Spiegel Says
- POM FP : Plastic Omnium’s 2014 Profitability Should Beat Last Year’s 7.7%
- SGO FP : Saint Gobain Wants Sika Mgmt to Stay, Haelg Tells SchweizAmS
- SAN FP : Alstom’s Kron Seen as Possible Candidate for Sanofi Top Job: JDD
- SIK VX : Saint Gobain Wants Sika Mgmt to Stay, Haelg Tells SchweizAmS
- SYNN VX : Syngenta Expects China Approval for MIR 162 Corn in Near Future
- TEC FP Technip Doesn’t Intend to File a Tender Offer for CGG
- TEF SM : Telefonica Aims to Improve German Network Quality: Handelsblatt
- TSCO LN : Tesco Planning Disposal of Unused Properties: Sunday Telegraph

(BN) Risk Is Back for Hedge Funds Chasing Glut of Mergers: Real M&A


Risk Is Back for Hedge Funds Chasing Glut of Mergers: Real M&A
2014-12-14 17:00:01.0 GMT


(for a Real M&A column news alert: {SALT REALMNA <GO>}.)

By Tara Lachapelle, Angus Whitley and Brett Foley
(Bloomberg) -- Merger-arbitrage traders didn’t have enough
risk last year. This year, they got more than their share -- and
it’s not going away.
Companies announced $2.8 trillion of acquisitions, making
2014 the busiest year since before the financial crisis.
Unprecedented amounts of money were spent in some industries,
such as pharmaceuticals, and the transactions skewed larger than
at any other time this century, according to data compiled by
Bloomberg. The slew of deals gave merger-arbitrage traders
plenty to wager on, after last year’s scarcity of profit
opportunities.
The explosion of megamergers brought volatility back to the
investing strategy. The deals have been fraught with challenges,
from regulatory scrutiny to the plummeting price of oil and the
government’s attempt to deter tax inversions. Betting on them
didn’t always pay off. More than $100 billion of potential
takeovers unexpectedly blew up, like when drugmaker AbbVie Inc.
called off its $55 billion purchase of Shire Plc. That burned
merger-arbitrage funds, some of which will end the year at a
loss even as stocks around the world surge.
“Drought conditions turned into basically flood conditions
this year,” Louis Meyer, a New York-based event-driven analyst
for Oscar Gruss & Son Inc., said in a phone interview.
“Volatility is good, but it can be a double-edged sword. The
positive aspect is you do have deals and the trend seems to be
continuing. On the other hand, you’ve had real risk emerge and
portfolio managers can no longer work on cruise control.”

Merger Spreads

This is how merger arbitrage is supposed to work: Company A
announces that it’s buying Company B. Over the time that it
takes for the deal to close, the target’s stock should rise to
the same price as the acquirer’s offer. Traders take positions
to capture that spread and reap a profit when the deal is
completed.
There was too much investor money chasing too few
transactions in 2013, so spreads were very tight and profits
were small. Acquisitions that were pending completion around
this time last year had a median spread of just 1.7 percent,
compared with 4 percent now, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
In the U.S., the largest deals have some of the widest
spreads. Oilfield-services provider Baker Hughes Inc. is trading
about 11 percent below Halliburton Co.’s $38 billion offer as
oil prices have continued to slump. Regulatory risk has left
gaps of more than 5 percent in other big deals including the $26
billion merger of cigarette makers Reynolds American Inc. and
Lorillard Inc., AT&T Inc.’s $66 billion purchase of DirecTV, and
Comcast Corp.’s $68 billion takeover of Time Warner Cable Inc.,
the biggest transaction of the year.

Deal Blowups

All the activity is good for investors who speculate on
deals, unless of course the situations unravel. Two days this
year dealt huge blows to traders. On Aug. 6, Sprint Corp. ended
talks to buy T-Mobile US Inc., and Twenty-First Century Fox Inc.
withdrew its bid for Time Warner Inc. Then in October, AbbVie
got cold feet over its Shire deal, which would have been the
largest tax inversion on record. Shire’s stock plunged 28
percent in two days.
“There have been an unusually large number of deal
cancellations recently making it very difficult to generate
positive returns,” Keith Moore, an analyst for MKM Partners,
said in a note to clients after AbbVie-Shire broke down. This
week, describing the risk-arbitrage environment, he said “a lot
of comments come to mind: difficult, volatile, surprising,
unpredictable or the ultimate roller-coaster ride.”
The Bloomberg Global Merger Arbitrage Hedge Funds Index was
climbing in the first half of 2014, but is now down 1 percent
for the year. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has gained 8.3
percent.

Going Global

Deals are on the rise in other parts of the world, too,
with a 31 percent jump in European takeovers and a 33 percent
increase in Asia. Europe hasn’t seen as many large transactions
stumble, with the exception of Pfizer Inc.’s failed cross-border
pursuit of London-based AstraZeneca Plc. Spreads also haven’t
been as wide in Europe as in North America and Asia, though
European deal activity probably will pick up next year.
In Asia, the perils have often outweighed the potential
rewards. Investors have attached more risk to Australian deals
than those in any other Asian market, according to data compiled
by Bloomberg. The chances of picking the final outcome may be
too slim, even for traders who specialize in betting on
potential takeovers, said Tristan K’Nell, Sydney-based head of
trading at Quay Equities.
“Definitely you want to see some upside, but just in the
short term, we’re probably seeing a little too much risk to
actually put the deals together,” he said by phone.

Iron Slump

The price of iron ore, Australia’s biggest export, has
plummeted about 49 percent this year and investors are concerned
about an economic slowdown in China, the world’s biggest buyer
of the commodity and Australia’s largest trading partner.
Economic growth in Australia unexpectedly slowed for a second
straight quarter in the three months ended September.
Goodman Fielder Ltd., Australia’s largest baker, is trading
8.1 percent below the value of a bid from palm oil producer
Wilmar International Ltd. and Hong Kong investment group First
Pacific Co. That offer had already been cut after the suitors
studied Goodman’s accounts and the deal still needs Chinese
regulatory approval.
Bradken Ltd., an Australian supplier of mining equipment,
is trading 12 percent shy of a reduced A$872 million offer from
Bain Capital Asia and Pacific Equity Partners. Transfield
Services Ltd., the builder of Melbourne’s Gateway Bridge, is 13
percent under the value of an initial A$1 billion bid from
Ferrovial SA.

‘Zero Tolerance’

Some deals in Australia have fizzled before terms have been
set. Private equity suitors including KKR & Co. failed to follow
through with initial offers of A$3.4 billion for Treasury Wine
Estates Ltd., the maker of Penfolds Grange wine. And an
indicative bid of as much as A$1.1 billion for Australian
standards company SAI Global Ltd. from Pacific Equity Partners
also never led to a final offer.
“There is zero tolerance” regarding transactions where an
agreement hasn’t yet been reached, James Santo, a special
situations trader at Aviate Global in Sydney, said by
phone.“Even in the event of a binding agreement, you want to
see low regulatory risk and a high chance of completion.”
As a rule, traders would prefer an environment with more
deals, even if it means more volatility. That said, it takes a
lot of work and a broad set of skills to navigate the risks and
still make money.
Arbitrage “requires a full tool belt just to compete,”
Meyer at Oscar Gruss said. “We’re back in an environment where
all of a sudden, all the tools need to be taken out of the belt
because they’re all going to be needed.”

For Related News and Information:
Merger Speculators Taking $20 Billion Bath as Deals Come Asunder
Day of $100 Billion in Deals Evokes Exxon-Mobil Merger: Real M&A
John Paulson Leads Deal Magicians Amid Tighter Spreads: Real M&A
Live Merger-Arbitrage Spreads: MARB <GO>
Real M&A columns: NI REALMNA <GO>
Top deal stories: DTOP <GO>

To contact the reporters on this story:
Tara Lachapelle in New York at +1-212-617-8911 or
tlachapelle@bloomberg.net;
Angus Whitley in Sydney at +61-2-9777-8643 or
awhitley1@bloomberg.net;
Brett Foley in Melbourne at +61-3-9228-8721 or
bfoley8@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Beth Williams at +1-212-617-2307 or
bewilliams@bloomberg.net
Mohammed Hadi

FT : Maurice Lévy tries to pick up Publicis after failed deal with Omnicom

Maurice Lévy tries to pick up Publicis after failed deal with Omnicom

The latest phrase to enter Maurice Lévy’s vocabulary is “to be ubered” and the head of Publicis Groupe, one of the world’s largest advertising groups, is using it with alarming frequency.
“Everyone is starting to worry about being ubered,” Mr Lévy tells the Financial Times in an interview, referring to the car-hailing app that is trying to upend the traditional taxi industry. “It’s the idea that you suddenly wake up to find your legacy business gone . . . clients have never been so confused or concerned about their brands or their business model.”

Mr Lévy’s own sector is no exception.
The “digital tsunami”, as he calls it, has caused more upheaval to advertising than at any time since the advent of radio and television. The rise of competitors such as Google and Facebook has changed the way people consume information. This has presented huge challenges to the likes of Publicis, whose brands include Saatchi & Saatchi and Leo Burnett, as well as interactive agencies such as Razorfish.
The failure in May of Publicis’s planned $35bn mega-merger with US rival Omnicom, seen at the time as a logical “size matters” response to the tsunami, has only underscored the scale of the challenge.
So how does Mr Lévy intend to survive and prosper in this brave new world? One answer is that he is doing what every other company is: hiring mathematicians and data scientists to help deliver the specific algorithms clients need to reach specific consumers.
“We employ geeks, techies and gamers,” he says. “Today, advertising campaigns are so highly targeted that they are often not even seen by the general public.”
Another answer came last month when Mr Lévy announced that the group would acquire Sapient, the Boston-based consultancy that specialises in digital but also provides business and technology services to the capital and commodity markets.
At the time the deal was announced, Mr Lévy called Sapient the “crown jewel” in omni-channel commerce and consulting. He told the FT that the all-cash $3.7bn acquisition, which he expects to close in the first quarter of next year, would break down the doors of other sectors just as digital is bringing the advertising world closer to the lucrative realms of consultancy and IT.
“It gives us a full set of services,” he says.
Advertising chart
Publicis certainly needs a lift. The Paris-based group, founded by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet in 1926, has notched up several quarters of disappointing growth. Sales were €1.75bn between July and the end of September — an organic growth of just 1 per cent compared with a year earlier.
By contrast, US rival Interpublic reported organic growth during the same period of 6.3 per cent. Even more galling, Omnicom grew at a spirited 6.5 per cent.
Mr Lévy says that his group’s poor recent performance is directly related to the failed tie-up. “We involved our people more than they [Omnicom] did, we believed more in the merger, we invested more time and passion,” he says. “We were pregnant with the idea of the merger and so have suffered while they enjoyed good growth.”
Mr Lévy says Publicis is reverting to maximising organic growth. Last week, he restated medium-term targets, promising shareholders that revenue would grow two percentage points, on average, higher than the rest of the industry in coming years. He also promised to increase operating margins — 16.2 per cent this year before including Sapient — by between 200 and 400 basis points.
But in a world in which most people agree that size matters, analysts are sceptical that Publicis’s planned acquisition of Sapient provides the necessary boost in scale. Sapient’s $1.26bn in revenues last year are small compared with Publicis’s €6.95bn, for example. Contrast all of that with the now-shattered dream of bonding with Omnicom’s roughly $14.6bn in annual revenues.
Advertising chart
Moreover, Sapient’s business may be mainly digital — boosting Publicis’s overall revenues from digital to more than 50 per cent of the total well before its 2018 target — but it is also highly concentrated in the US. That will do little to expand the group’s footprint in emerging markets, which last year accounted for less than a quarter of the Paris-based group’s overall revenue.
Analysts also question whether the convergence opportunities in consulting and technology that Mr Lévy has signalled will materialise. Bernstein Research, for example, recently argued that consulting companies tend to be highly specialised and their deep knowledge of their sector already allows them to provide the value-added services Mr Lévy has identified.
The report, entitled “Christmas came early . . . to Sapient”, a reference to the 19.5 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation at which Publicis’s offer values the company, concluded: “The crossover between financial services and digital marketing is not natural or convincing.”

Publicis shares fell on the day it announced the acquisition. The stock is down about 11 per cent since the start of the year. Meanwhile, Omnicom shares are up 4.2 per cent over the same period. Shares in Havas, Publicis’s much smaller Paris rival, are up 13.6 per cent. Of Publicis’ main rivals, only UK-based WPP has seen its shares fall this year — though only by 4.4 per cent.
With the verdict still unclear on the Sapient acquisition, there is nevertheless one thing on which everyone agrees: the deal does nothing to resolve the puzzle of succession.
A tie-up with Omnicom would have provided the 72-year-old Mr Lévy with an elegant solution, crowning his 27 years at the top of Publicis with the biggest merger in advertising history and gradually handing over the reins to John Wren, his counterpart at Omnicom.
As things stand, Mr Lévy has had to buy time to find the right replacement by extending his original retirement date by 18 months until the group’s annual general meeting in May 2017.
Sitting in his office, connected by a door to the impeccably preserved room — complete with Picassos and a Giacometti — from which Bleustein-Blanchet used to run things, Mr Lévy says that choosing his successor is a job for Publicis’s board.
And it is one that he insists will begin at the end of next year. In the meantime, he says, his responsibility is to ensure that there is an internal candidate ready in time.
Has he already started that process?
“I have never stopped,” he replies.
Digital tsunami blurs the lines
The “digital tsunami”, as Maurice Lévy calls it, has blurred the razor-sharp lines that once separated IT from advertising, forcing the world’s biggest marketing groups to partner with software companies.
In September, Publicis announced an alliance with Adobe, the US technology group, to offer a range of digital marketing tools.
The “Always-On Platform”, as Publicis calls it, will help clients manage their campaigns across devices as well as to measure their effectiveness. The company says it will also help them to target potential customers more effectively.
In the same month, Omnicom announced a strategic alliance with Salesforce.com, the San Francisco-based cloud computing company, to provide customers with a range of customer relations management tools.
The alliances do not involve any equity, sending a clear message to investors in the advertising groups that the companies do not intend to sink money into acquiring IT companies.
But they illustrate the growing importance of providing digital tools to support the growing demand for targeted, online campaigns. The days of the blockbuster television advertising campaign are not yet over. But it seems clear that the era of digital campaigns that are highly targeted to specific people are here to stay.

FT : Abe wins mandate to continue but not all Japanese convinced

Abe wins mandate to continue but not all Japanese convinced

Shinzo Abe did not seem jubilant, or even terribly relieved.
Instead, when Japan’s prime minister spoke on television late on Sunday evening, a couple of hours after exit polls suggested that he had secured another four years at the helm of the world’s third-largest economy, his tone was subdued.

“We have received an endorsement for the last two years of the Abe administration,” he said. “But we must not be conceited.”
A little humility was probably in order. When Mr Abe’s Liberal Democratic party swept to power two years ago, it was with about 1.7m fewer votes in single-member districts than it had won in 2009, when it came up against a resurgent Democratic party. This time, the LDP won even less popular support than it had in 2012, as its voting share looked set to remain stable while turnout dropped to a new record low of about 52 per cent, from 59.3 per cent last time.
After all the rigmarole of a snap election likely to have cost about Y60bn ($505m), the LDP ended up about where it started, with 290 seats in the 475-seat lower house. Together with its coalition partner, Komeito, it has retained the two-thirds majority needed to override the upper house, where opposition parties are stronger.
“Mr Abe has passed a midterm examination,” said Harukata Takenaka, a professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo. “The final test is yet to come.”
The prime minister had billed the poll as a referendum on his sweeping economic programme, also known as “Abenomics”, which is aimed at ridding Japan of deflation.
Mr Abe is from a wealthy family so he has no idea that ordinary people are feeling bullied. Only big companies and people who own stocks have benefited from ‘Abenomics.’ It is unfair
- Yukio Kanno, 73
Yet even among the people who went out to vote on an unusually cold December day — Tokyo saw its first winter snowfall about three weeks earlier than average — there was broad ambivalence towards the big stimulus efforts. According to exit polls carried out by NHK, the national broadcaster, there was a fairly even split between people who said they valued “Abenomics” (52 per cent) and those who said they did not (46 per cent).
Despite a lot of talk from Mr Abe that his reflationary drive is “the only way” for Japan, large swaths of voters have yet to experience benefits through higher wages. For many, the most obvious effect remains the collapse in the yen, which has boosted companies’ profits but pushed up people’s cost of living — a squeeze exacerbated by April’s increase in the consumption tax from 5 per cent to 8 per cent.
“Mr Abe is from a wealthy family so he has no idea that ordinary people are feeling bullied,” said Yukio Kanno, a 73 year-old pensioner from the western Tokyo district of Matsudo, who cast a vote for the centre-right Japan Innovation Party, formed from a split of other minority groups just three months ago. “Only big companies and people who own stocks have benefited from ‘Abenomics.’ It is unfair.”
Meanwhile, many voters say they are worried that Mr Abe may use an extended mandate not to push for longer-term structural reforms to boost Japan’s competitiveness — the so-called “third arrow” of Abenomics — but to pursue matters closer to his heart, such as redrafting the country’s pacifist constitution.
Rie Yamanaka, a 32 year-old tax accountant who backed the JIP in her central-Tokyo district of Koto on Sunday morning, said that she welcomes Mr Abe’s basic ideas to perk up the economy, but is “scared” by his assertive foreign policy, which has strained Japan’s relations with China and South Korea.
“During the last election campaign, there was not much talk about revising the constitution,” she said, alluding to Mr Abe’s move earlier this year to loosen rules on how Japan’s self-defence forces can be deployed to support allies. “But once the LDP got an overwhelming number of seats, Mr Abe’s behaviour changed. It makes me wonder if the party is really OK.”
The prime minister gave a glimpse of these broader interests on Sunday evening, when he argued that the election had not been merely about Abenomics but was a vote on “which party should govern.”
Reworking Japan’s constitution was the LDP’s “long-held wish,” he said. Over the next few years, he would “work towards deepening public understanding on constitutional revision.”