>>> Asian Update

Asian Mid-session Update: Japan upgrades industrial output while CPIs hit fresh multi-month lows


***Economic Data***
- (JP) JAPAN DEC NATIONAL CPI Y/Y: 2.4% V 2.3%E; CPI EX FRESH FOOD Y/Y: 2.5% (9-month low) V 2.6%E
- (JP) JAPAN JAN TOKYO CPI Y/Y: 2.3% V 2.2%E; CPI EX FRESH FOOD Y/Y: 2.2% (10-month low) V 2.2%E
- (JP) JAPAN DEC OVERALL HOUSEHOLD SPENDING Y/Y: -3.4% V -2.3%E; 9th month of decline
- (JP) JAPAN DEC VEHICLE PRODUCTION Y/Y: -2.5% V -12.2% PRIOR
- (JP) JAPAN DEC PRELIMINARY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION M/M: 1.0% V 1.2%E; Y/Y: 0.3% V 0.3%E
- (JP) JAPAN DEC JOBLESS RATE: 3.4% V 3.5%E (lowest since Aug 1997); Job to applicant ratio 1.15 v 1.12e
- (AU) AUSTRALIA DEC PRIVATE SECTOR CREDIT M/M: 0.5% V 0.5%E; Y/Y: 5.9% V 5.9%E
- (AU) AUSTRALIA Q4 PPI Q/Q: 0.1% V 0.2% PRIOR; Y/Y: 1.1% V 1.2% PRIOR
- (NZ) New Zealand Dec M3 Money Supply Y/Y: 6.3% v 5.8% Prior
- (SG) SINGAPORE Q4 PRELIMINARY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 1.9% V 2.0%E
- (SG) Singapore Dec Credit Card Bad Debts (SGD): 23.5M v 24.7M Prior; Credit Card Billings: 4.37B v 3.82B Prior
- (KR) SOUTH KOREA DEC INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION M/M: 3.0% V 0.9%E; Y/Y: +0.4% V -1.7%E
- (KR) SOUTH KOREA DEC CYCLICAL LEADING INDEX CHANGE: 0.2% v 0.0% PRIOR

***Index Snapshot (as of 03:30 GMT)***
- Nikkei225 +0.8%, S&P/ASX +0.9%, Kospi flat, Shanghai Composite -1.0%, Hang Seng -0.1%, Mar S&P500 -0.3% at 2,012

***Commodities/Fixed Income***
- Apr gold +0.4% at $1,261, Mar crude oil +0.1% at $44.57/brl, Mar copper -0.5% at $2.44/lb
- GLD: SPDR Gold Trust ETF daily holdings rise 5.7 tonnes to 758.4 tonnes; highest since Oct 16th
- (JP) BOJ offers to buy ¥400B in 1-3yr JGBs, ¥400B in 3-5yr JGBs, ¥400B in 5-10yr JGBs and ¥2.5T in T-bills
- (AU) Australia MoF (AOFM) sells A$700M in 2.75% bonds due 2024; Avg yield: 2.4315%; Bid-to-cover: 3.84x
- (US) Weekly Fed Balance Sheet Total Assets for week ending Jan 28th: $4.50T v $4.51T prior; M1 y/y change: 9.5% v 9.4% w/w; M2 y/y change: 5.8% v 5.8% w/w

***Market Focal Points/FX***
- Falling oil prices continued to weigh on inflation in Japan, sending core nationwide and Tokyo CPIs to 9- and 10-month lows respectively. Analysts are speculating that eventually, lower energy costs will translate into higher spending, but that development is yet to materialize. Meanwhile, Japan is approaching the consumption tax hike rolloff in April, which could send annual CPI levels back to negative territory and further dampen Abenomics objective of 2% inflation target. Recall a recent Nikkei survey has already stated that some 60% of respondents do not believe Abenomics policies had any significant impact on economy. Other economic datapoints in Japan were similarly troubling. Household consumption fell y/y for the 9th straight month, and Industrial Output missed consensus, which did not stop the govt from raising economic assessment on production to "gradually recovering". The skeptical disconnect between soft economic data and upbeat govt sentiment is translating into a USD/JPY retreat - the pair is down some 60pips from the highs below 117.90.

- Going into next week's RBA policy decision, analysts appear to be increasingly divided on whether the Aussie central bank will cut rates or simply shift to a much more dovish stance, particularly in light of the much more accommodative than anticipated position adopted this week by the RBNZ. AUD/USD briefly fell 25pips to 0.7760 on reports that nearly half of surveyed economists see RBA cutting rates by as early as March and a quarter expect a cut next month. Treasurer Hockey said noted markets and economy need to adjust to falling AUD, adding that a flexible economy can actually benefit from currency weakness.

- Shanghai Composite is down for the 4th straight day and on pace for its first lower weekly close in 10 weeks, as headwinds from recent scrutiny into margin trading are finally translating into more tangible retreat. According to a survey, fund managers reduced their suggested equity allocation for the next three months to 82.8% from 85.9%, and increased their suggested bond allocation to 6.8% from 5.1% in the prior month. Separately, Ministry of Finance reported 2014 Fiscal Spending rose 8.2%, while Revenue was up 8.6%. A-shares are down 1% on the day going into the final hour of trading.

***Equities***
US markets:
- ICPT: Receives breakthrough therapy designation From FDA for Obeticholic Acid for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) with Liver Fibrosis; +28.9% afterhours
- GIMO: Reports Q4 $0.18 v $0.08e, R$51.3M v $43.1Me; +18.4% afterhours
- SYNA: Reports Q2 $1.46 v $1.22e, R$464M v $448Me; +12.7% afterhours
- AMZN: Reports Q4 $0.45 v $0.24e, R$29.3B v $29.8Be; Amazon Prime global membership +53% in 2014; +12.2% afterhours
- MTW: To split into Two independent companies, Cranes and Foodservices businesses; +8.4% afterhours
- BIIB: Reports Q4 $3.74 v $3.76e, R$2.64B v $2.65Be; +7.4% afterhours
- QLGC: Reports Q3 $0.36 v $0.28e, R$140.2M v $138Me; +7.2% afterhours
- NGVC: Reports Q1 $0.16 v $0.14e, R$146M v $143Me; +6.8% afterhours
- V: Reports Q1 $2.53 v $2.50e, R$3.38B v $3.34Be; To split stock 4 for 1, effective March 19th; +4.6% afterhours
- EMN: Reports Q4 $1.64 v $1.54e, R$2.35B v $2.33Be; Guides FY15 EPS "similar to 2014" (~$7.07 v $7.43e); +2.0% afterhours
- BRCM: Reports Q4 $0.76 v $0.87e, R$2.14B v $2.12Be; +1.7% afterhours
- GOOG: Reports Q4 $6.88 v $7.13e, R$14.5B v $14.8Be; +1.5% afterhours
- LUK: Macquarie Group said to be in talks to acquire Jefferies commodities and financial derivatives unit Pru Bache; Terms not disclosed - press; flat afterhours
- MCHP: Reports Q3 $0.64 v $0.62e, R$536M v $526Me; -0.8% afterhours
- SCSC: Reports Q2 $0.68 v $0.66e, R$807.0M v $795Me; -2.5% afterhours
- GDOT: Reports Q4 $0.16 v $0.17e, R$150.6M v $151Me; -4.3% afterhours
- DECK: Reports Q3 $4.50 v $4.52e, R$784.7M v $811Me; -14.3% afterhours

- SHAK: Confirms to price 5M shares of IPO at $21/shr, above $17-19/shr expected range

Notable movers by sector:
- Financials: Shizuoka Bank 8355.JP +2.4% (9-month results); Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings 8309.JP +2.2% (9-month results); Shinsei Bank 8303.JP +5.4% (9-month results); ORIX Corp 8591.JP -3.1% (9-month results)
- Materials: Newcrest Mining NCM.AU +0.2% (Q2 production results); BC Iron BCI.AU -3.1% (Q2 production results); Whitehaven Coal WHC.AU -3.7% (H1 results); Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp 5401.JP -3.4% (9-month results); RUSAL 486.HK +1.2% (FY14 production results)
- Energy: Tohoku Electric 9506.JP +3.2% (9-month results)
- Industrials: China Shipping Container 2866.HK +2.1% (FY14 guidance); China Automation Group 569.HK -8.0% (FY14 guidance); Fuji Electric Holding 6504.JP +3.3% (9-month results); Daihatsu Motor 7262.JP +3.1% (9-month results); Yamato Holdings 9064.JP +6.5% (9-month results)
- Technology: Toshiba Corp 6502.JP +3.7% (9-month results); NEC Corp 6701.JP -6.4% (9-month results); Kyocera Corp 6971.JP -2.9% (9-month results)
- Telecom: Softbank 9984.JP -3.3% (Alibaba Q4 results)

>>> After Hours : AMZN +14%, BIIB +6.9%, V +4.6%, GOOG +1.9%

After Hours Summary: AMZN +14%, BIIB +6.9%, V +4.6%, GOOG +1.9%, DECK -13.9%, ALGN -9.7% following earnings/guidance

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings: GIMO +18.2%, AMZN +14%, SYNA +11.7%, MITK +8.6%, MTW +7.6%, BIIB +6.9%, NGVC +6.8%, QLGC +5.2%, V +4.6%, BRCM +2.7%, AVNW +2.2%, EMN +2%, GOOG +1.9%, CPHD +1.7%, GSIT +0.6%, RVBD +0.3%, ISBC +0.1%, VR +0.1%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: BAMM +34.1% (Anderson Bamm Holdings filed amended 13D; offered to purchase 100% of outstanding shares at $2.75 a share), ICPT +30.7% (received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from FDA for obeticholic acid for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with liver fibrosis), INUV +16.9% (disclosed that its wholly owned subsidiary Vertro and Google (GOOG) entered into a Google Services Agreement effective as of February 1, 2015), MTW +7.6% (announced intent to separate into two independent publicly-traded companies), MNOV +5.0% (received new patent convering MN-029 (denibulin) di-hydrochloride in Japan), V +4.4% (announced 4-for-1 split; co also reported earnings)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings: COOL -23.9%, DECK -13.9%, TUES -9.9%, ALGN -9.7%, HA -8%, CPSI -5.6%, INVN -5.1%, JDSU -4.8%, GDOT -4.3%, HBI -3.3%, UIS -2.7%, SCSC -2.5%, RHI -1.2%, PKI -0.9%, MCHP -0.8%, CTCT -0.8%, SWI -0.7%, LEG -0.7%, HNNA -0.5%, KFX -0.1%, CB -0.1%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: ADES -12.2% (announced KPMG has resigned as the Company's independent accounting firm; expects its shares to be delisted by Nasdaq), AHT -1.6% (announced offering of 9.5 mln shares of common stock) 

>>> Google misses by $0.25, misses on revs

Google misses by $0.25, misses on revs

Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $6.88 per share, $0.25 worse than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $7.13; revenues rose 15.2% year/year to $18.1 bln vs the $18.44 bln consensus.

GOOG Site Revenues +18% compared to +20% in Q3.

* Revenues and Monetization
Sites Revenues - Our sites generated revenues of $12.43 billion, or 69% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014. This represents an 18% increase over fourth quarter 2013 sites revenues of $10.54 billion.
Network Revenues - Our partner sites generated revenues of $3.72 billion, or 20% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014. This represents a 6% increase over fourth quarter 2013 network revenues of $3.52 billion.
Other Revenues - Other revenues were $1.95 billion, or 11% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014. This represents a 19% increase over fourth quarter 2013 other revenues of $1.65 billion.
International Revenues - Our revenues from outside of the United States totaled $10.23 billion, representing 56% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 58% in the third quarter of 2014 and 56% in the fourth quarter of 2013.
* Paid Clicks and Cost per Clicks
Paid Clicks increased approximately 14% y/y and 11% q/q.
Cost-Per-Click decreased approximately 3% y/y and q/q. Cost-per-click for Google sites decreased approximately 8% y/y and q/q.
* Expenses
Operating expenses, other than cost of revenues, were $6.78 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, or 37% of revenues, compared to $5.03 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, or 32% of revenues.
Free cash flow was $2.81 billion compared to $2.98 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. We expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures.

>>> US Close Dow+1,31% S&P+0,95% Nasdaq+0,98% Russell+1,28%

Closing Market Summary: Stocks Snap Two-Day Losing Streak Amid Upbeat Earnings

The stock market endured a volatile session on Thursday, but a steady rebound off morning lows helped the major averages register their first gain in three days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average paced the advance (+1.3%) while the S&P 500 (+1.0%) reclaimed its 100-day moving average (2,010).

Equities faced some selling pressure at the start amid continued weakness in crude oil. The energy component set a fresh January low in the $43.60/bbl area, but was able to charge back to unchanged by the pit close. That rebound improved the overall risk tolerance and helped the S&P 500 find support just a point above its January low (1988.12). Dip buyers entered the picture about 90 minutes after the start of the session, which helped all ten sectors rebound off their lows.

The materials space (+1.4%) finished in the lead thanks to better than expected earnings from Dow Chemical (DOW 45.02, +1.99). The stock spiked 4.6% and gave a boost to its peers. Meanwhile, the other commodity-related sector—energy (+0.2%)—was the weakest performer.

Elsewhere, the discretionary sector (+1.3%) outperformed throughout the session after several major components reported earnings. Homebuilders surged after PulteGroup (PHM 21.82, +1.24) and Ryland Group (RYL 39.62, +2.95) reported better than expected results with iShares Dow Jones US Home Construction ETF (ITB 25.86, +0.83) spiking 3.3%. Heavily-weighted Ford (F 14.85, +0.39) and McDonald's (MCD 93.27, +4.49) also rallied after the former beat estimates while the latter announced the retirement of its Chief Executive Officer. The broad strength within the sector overshadowed an 8.8% loss in the shares of Alibaba (BABA 89.81, -8.64) after the company missed revenue expectations.

Similarly, the industrial sector (+1.2%) outperformed while technology (+1.1%) overtook the broader market into the close. Top-weighted names like Apple (AAPL 118.90, +3.59), IBM (IBM 155.48, +3.93), and Microsoft (MSFT 42.01, +0.82) jumped between 2.0% and 3.1%, which helped overshadow a 10.3% decline in Qualcomm (QCOM 63.69, -7.30) brought on by disappointing guidance for the fiscal year.

When the dust settled, four of six cyclical sectors ended ahead of the S&P 500 while the utilities sector (+1.3%) represented the only outperformer on the countercyclical side.

Treasuries spent the day in a steady retreat with the 10-yr yield climbing four basis points to 1.76%.

Today's participation was a bit above average as 843 million shares changed hands at the NYSE floor.

Economic data was limited to jobless claims and pending home sales:
  • The initial claims level dropped to 265,000 for the week ending January 24 from an upwardly revised 308,000 (from 307,000) while the consensus expected a decline to 301,000 
    • Not only did the drop break three consecutive weeks above 300,000, but the initial claims level fell to its lowest level since April 2000 o As it has for the past several months, the Department of Labor reported that there were no special factors impacting the report 
    • The continuing claims level declined to 2.385 million from an upwardly revised 2.456 million (from 2.443 million) while the consensus expected a drop to 2.429 million 
  • Pending home sales for December fell 3.7% while the consensus expected an increase of 0.6% 
Tomorrow, the advance reading of Q4 GDP (consensus 3.2%) will be released at 8:30 ET alongside the Q4 Employment Cost Index (consensus 0.5%). The Chicago PMI report for January (consensus 58.0) will cross the wires at 9:45 ET while the final reading of the January Michigan Sentiment Index will be reported at 9:55 ET (consensus 98.2).
  • Nasdaq Composite -1.1% YTD 
  • Russell 2000 -1.1% YTD 
  • S&P 500 -1.8% YTD 
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average -2.3% YTD

(BUS) The Manitowoc Company Announces Intent to Separate Into Two Independent Pu


BFW 01/29 21:04 Manitowoc to Split Into Two Companies
BN 01/29 21:14 *MANITOWOC TO AMEND BY-LAWS TO ELIMINATE CLASSIFIED BOARD
BN 01/29 21:02 *MANITOWOC SEES SEPARATION OF CRANES & FOODSERVICE
BN 01/29 21:01 *MANITOWOC SEES SPIN-OFF COMPLETED IN 1Q OF '16
BFW 01/29 21:01 *MANITOWOC TO SEPARATE INTO TWO INDEPENDENT PUBLICLY-TRADED COS.
BN 01/29 21:01 *MANITOWOC SEES TAX-FREE SPIN-OFF OF FOODSERVICE BUSINESS
BN 01/29 21:01 *MANITOWOC SEES SEPARATION THROUGH TAX-FREE SPIN-OFF
BN 01/29 21:01 *MANITOWOC TO SEPARATE INTO TWO INDEPENDENT PUBLICLY-TRADED COS.
BN 01/29 21:01 * MANITOWOC CO. REPORTS INTENT TO SEPARATE INTO TWO INDEPENDENT

The Manitowoc Company Announces Intent to Separate Into Two Independent Publicly-Traded Companies
2015-01-29 21:01:00.236 GMT

The Manitowoc Company Announces Intent to Separate Into Two Independent
Publicly-Traded Companies

Separation Expected to Generate Value for Shareholders by Creating Two Strong,
Industry-Leading Companies

Accelerates Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2014 Financial Results Conference
Call in Order to Discuss Separation; Call to be Held Today at 6:00 p.m. EST

Business Wire

MANITOWOC, Wis. -- January 29, 2015

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW) (“Manitowoc” or the “Company”) today
announced that its Board of Directors has approved a plan to pursue a
separation of the Company's Cranes and Foodservice businesses into two
independent, publicly-traded companies. The Company currently anticipates
effecting the separation through a tax-free spin-off of the Foodservice
business and expects the spin-off to be completed in the first quarter of
2016, creating two separate, industry-leading companies with distinct
enterprise strategies.

“Manitowoc’s management team and our Board of Directors regularly evaluate and
explore opportunities to optimize the Company’s performance and create value
for shareholders,” commented Glen E. Tellock, chairman and chief executive
officer of the Company. “Manitowoc has taken and continues to take actions to
enhance returns, including margin expansion initiatives, re-investment in our
businesses, and utilization of our free cash flow to de-lever our balance
sheet. We believe the separation of Cranes and Foodservice will position these
businesses to take advantage of anticipated long-term improvement in demand
and other opportunities in their respective markets.”

Tellock continued, “Over the past several years, we have transformed Manitowoc
and worked to build two strong business platforms within one enterprise, and
each business enjoys global leadership and is positioned for sustainable
growth and value creation. After a comprehensive evaluation, including a
thorough review of the current and projected operating environments for the
two segments, we have determined that the Cranes and Foodservice businesses
are best-suited to realize their full potential on a standalone basis.”

Two Industry-Leading, Independent Public Companies with Distinct Strengths

The Cranes business, which reported annual revenue of $2.3 billion in the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014, is one of the world’s largest
providers of lifting equipment for the global construction industry, including
lattice-boom cranes, tower cranes, mobile telescopic cranes, and boom trucks.
The business holds leading market positions and highly recognized brands,
including Manitowoc, Grove, National Crane, Potain, Shuttlelift and Crane Care
brand names. The business operates 37 facilities in 18 countries and generates
nearly 60% of its revenue from non-U.S. markets. Through its extensive global
footprint, strategic focus on product innovation, and strong after-market
support, the Cranes business is well-positioned to take advantage of expected
improving demand in the residential and non-residential construction markets
to generate long-term growth in revenue and net income.

The Foodservice business, which reported annual revenue of $1.6 billion in the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014, is one of the world’s leading
innovators and manufacturers of commercial foodservice equipment serving the
ice, beverage, refrigeration, food prep, and cooking needs of restaurants,
convenience stores, hotels, hospitals, and other institutions. The business
has a worldwide network of 120 distributors serving dozens of well-recognized
restaurant chains. The business promotes more than 24 industry-leading brands,
including Manitowoc, Garland, Convotherm, Cleveland, Lincoln, Merrychef,
Frymaster, Delfield, Kolpak, Kysor Panel, Servend, Multiplex, KitchenCare,
Inducs, Koolaire and Manitowoc Beverage System, and has a global presence that
spans five continents and more than 80 countries. Through its broad range of
innovative products, expansion of its global network, and launch of
sustainability initiatives, the Foodservice business is expected to enhance
profitability and generate strong cash flow.

Benefits

The Company determined to pursue the separation of the two businesses in order
to:

* Position each business to pursue individual strategies as market
conditions improve;
* Enable each business to attract a long-term investor base appropriate for
the particular operational and financial characteristics of each entity;
* Enable investors to value each company separately; and
* Enhance the flexibility of each business to pursue distinct capital
structures and capital allocation strategies to meet the individual needs
of each business.

Manitowoc expects to continue to execute its stated strategy and capital
allocation plans as management works through the execution of the separation,
resulting in further deleveraging from now until completion of the
transaction. As a result, Manitowoc expects each independent company to have a
capital structure and credit rating consistent with that of Manitowoc today.

Transaction Information

Additional information on structure, management, governance, and other
significant matters will be provided at a later date. The proposed separation
is subject to customary conditions, including receipt of legal opinions
concerning the tax-free nature of the transaction, effectiveness of
appropriate filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and final
approval by the Company's Board of Directors.

The Company notes that there can be no assurance that a separation will
ultimately occur or, if one does occur, as to its terms or timing. Any
transaction of this type is dependent on numerous factors that include the
macroeconomic environment, credit markets, and equity markets.

Governance Enhancements

Manitowoc also announced today that the Board has approved amendments to the
Company’s by-laws to eliminate its classified board structure on a phased-in
basis commencing with the elections occurring at the Company’s 2015 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. It is also expected that the spun-off business will
have an annually elected Board of Directors upon completion of the separation
and an overall corporate governance structure that is in line with best
practices.

Currently, the Manitowoc Board is divided into three classes, with each
director class serving a staggered term of three years. Under the terms of the
declassification, all current directors would serve the remainder of their
terms and thereafter become subject to election each year by shareholders. The
change would go into effect beginning with those directors whose terms expire
at the 2015 Annual Meeting. As of the 2017 Annual Meeting, all Board members
will be subject to annual election.

“The Board regularly reviews its corporate governance practices to ensure it
is operating efficiently, effectively, and in the best interests of
shareholders,” said Tellock. “We believe that strong governance practices help
support value creation and that now is the appropriate time to enhance our
governance and ensure that our investors have a regular opportunity to express
their confidence in the performance of the Board and management. The Board
believes that this action is in the best interest of the Company and its
shareholders.”

Advisors

Goldman, Sachs & Co. is serving as financial advisor and Foley & Lardner LLP
and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP are serving as legal advisors to
the Company.

Investor Conference Call

Today at 6:00 p.m. ET (5:00 p.m. CT), Manitowoc’s senior management will
review the proposed separation as well as discuss its fourth-quarter and
full-year results announced separately today. All interested parties may
listen to the live conference call via the Internet by going to the Investor
Relations area of Manitowoc’s Web site at http://www.manitowoc.com. A replay
of the conference call will also be available at the same location on the Web
site.

About The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Founded in 1902, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. is a multi-industry, capital
goods manufacturer with 92 manufacturing, distribution, and service facilities
in 25 countries. The company is recognized globally as one of the premier
innovators and providers of crawler cranes, tower cranes, and mobile cranes
for the heavy construction industry. Manitowoc is also one of the world's
leading innovators and manufacturers of commercial foodservice equipment,
which includes 24 market-leading brands of hot- and cold-focused equipment. In
addition, both segments are complemented by a slate of industry-leading
product support services. In 2014, Manitowoc’s revenues totaled $3.9 billion,
with approximately half of these revenues generated outside of the United
States.

Forward-looking Statements

This press release includes "forward-looking statements" intended to qualify
for the safe harbor from liability under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained in this press release that are
not historical facts, including statements about the separation of the Company
into two independent publicly-traded companies, the nature and impact of such
a separation, and the capitalization of the two independent companies, are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on the current
expectations of the management of the company and are subject to uncertainty
and changes in circumstances. Forward-looking statements include, without
limitation, statements typically containing words such as "intends,"
"expects," "anticipates," "targets," "estimates," “should” and words of
similar import. By their nature, forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance or results and involve risks and uncertainties because
they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the
future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and
developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results and
developments to differ materially include, among others:

* possible negative effects on the Company’s business operations, assets or
financial results as a result of the planned separation of the Company
into two independent publicly-traded companies;
* capitalization of the two independent companies;
* unanticipated changes in revenues, margins, costs, and capital
expenditures;
* the ability to significantly improve profitability;
* the ability to direct resources to those areas that will deliver the
highest returns;
* uncertainties associated with new product introductions, the successful
development and market acceptance of new and innovative products that
drive growth;
* the ability to focus on the customer, new technologies, and innovation;
* the ability to focus and capitalize on product quality and reliability;
* the ability to increase operational efficiencies across each of
Manitowoc’s business segments and to capitalize on those efficiencies;
* the ability to capitalize on key strategic opportunities and the ability
to implement Manitowoc’s long-term initiatives;
* the ability to generate cash and manage working capital consistent with
Manitowoc’s stated goals;
* the ability to convert order and order activity into sales and the timing
of those sales;
* pressure of financing leverage;
* matters impacting the successful and timely implementation of ERP systems;
* foreign currency fluctuations and their impact on reported results and
hedges in place with Manitowoc;
* changes in raw material and commodity prices;
* unexpected issues associated with the quality of materials and components
sourced from third parties and the resolution of those issues;
* unexpected issues associated with the availability and viability of
suppliers;
* the risks associated with growth;
* geographic factors and political and economic conditions and risks;
* actions of competitors;
* changes in economic or industry conditions generally or in the markets
served by Manitowoc;
* unanticipated changes in customer demand, including changes in global
demand for high-capacity lifting equipment; changes in demand for lifting
equipment and foodservice equipment in emerging economies, and changes in
demand for used lifting equipment and foodservice equipment;
* global expansion of customers;
* the replacement cycle of technologically obsolete cranes;
* the ability of Manitowoc's customers to receive financing;
* foodservice equipment replacement cycles in national accounts and global
chains, including unanticipated issues associated with refresh/renovation
plans by national restaurant accounts and global chains;
* efficiencies and capacity utilization of facilities;
* issues relating to the ability to timely and effectively execute on
manufacturing strategies, including issues relating to new plant
start-ups, plant closings, and/or consolidations of existing facilities
and operations;
* issues related to workforce reductions and subsequent rehiring;
* work stoppages, labor negotiations, labor rates, and temporary labor
costs;
* government approval and funding of projects and the effect of
government-related issues or developments;
* the ability to complete and appropriately integrate restructurings,
consolidations, acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances, joint
ventures, and other strategic alternatives;
* realization of anticipated earnings enhancements, cost savings, strategic
options and other synergies, and the anticipated timing to realize those
savings, synergies, and options;
* unanticipated issues affecting the effective tax rate for the year;
* unanticipated changes in the capital and financial markets;
* risks related to actions of activist shareholders;
* changes in laws throughout the world;
* natural disasters disrupting commerce in one or more regions of the world;
* risks associated with data security and technological systems and
protections;
* acts of terrorism; and
* risks and other factors cited in Manitowoc's filings with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Manitowoc undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or
otherwise. Forward-looking statements only speak as of the date on which they
are made. Information on the potential factors that could affect the company's
actual results of operations is included in its filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Contact:

The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
Carl J. Laurino, 920-652-1720
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
or
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher
Nick Lamplough, 212-355-4449

-0- Jan/29/2015 21:01 GMT

(Mediapart) Airbus est menacé par une affaire de commissions occultes

pdf attached - stock still trading in New York, trading on highs {EADSY US Equity DES<GO>}

Englis version at the bottom of the bbg

Airbus est menacé par une affaire de commissions occultes

Un contrat de 10 milliards de dollars portant sur la livraison de 160 Airbus, signé en 2007, a-t-il donné lieu à un système de commissions occultes ? Deux intermédiaires turcs accusent le groupe aéronautique. La brigade financière enquête. Mediapart a obtenu un document manuscrit attribué au numéro trois du groupe, fixant le niveau des commissions à 250 millions de dollars.

Avec des créanciers comme ceux-là, le groupe Airbus est mal tombé. Deux hommes d’affaires turcs, Sinan Gursoy, 60 ans, et Okan Tapan, 67 ans, intermédiaires occasionnels du groupe aéronautique européen, ont déposé plainte à Paris en avril dernier pour « abus de confiance » contre Airbus après lui avoir réclamé, en vain, le paiement des commissions qu’ils attendaient sur la vente de 160 avions à la Chine. L’enquête, qui vient d’être confiée à la Brigade financière, met au jour un nouveau système de commissions occultes mis en place pour décrocher le marché chinois.

Ce sujet pourrait s’avérer plus qu’embarrassant au plan diplomatique. Manuel Valls, en voyage officiel en Chine, a en effet visité jeudi l’usine d’assemblage d’A320 construite par le groupe européen à Taijin, près de Pékin, en partenariat avec les Chinois. Et les deux intermédiaires turcs ont, semble-t-il, bien l’intention de révéler la face cachée de ce succès industriel. Ils ont en effet décidé de communiquer une partie de leurs archives à la police et aux juges, et notamment un document manuscrit attribué au directeur de la stratégie et du marketing du groupe, Marwan Lahoud, qui fixait, en 2007, le montant des commissions à 2,5 % du chiffre d’affaires du marché chinois.

Lors d’un rendez-vous à l’hôtel Raphaël à Paris, le dirigeant du groupe aurait lui-même mis noir sur blanc les pourcentages de commission à verser en cas de vente. Ce feuillet permettait aux deux Turcs d’espérer une rétribution de 250 millions de dollars, qu’ils devaient partager avec un troisième homme, un intermédiaire ouïghour très introduit à Pékin, Dilsat Atus. Au lieu de quoi, ils n’ont reçu que 2 millions de dollars chacun.

Ces nouvelles investigations ont de quoi inquiéter Airbus, puisque les archives des intermédiaires semblent témoigner des pratiques illégales du groupe en Turquie et en Chine. Alors même qu’une autre information judiciaire est déjà en cours sur les ventes de satellites et d’hélicoptères par le groupe Airbus au Kazakhstan, en 2009 et 2010. Dans ce dossier, les juges Roger Le Loire et René Grouman enquêtent sur le rôle de l’oligarque Patokh Chodiev et sur ses liens avec plusieurs dirigeants d’EADS, au premier rang desquels Marwan Lahoud.

Pour ce dernier, qui a été à la tête des plus importants groupes d’armement français – Aérospatiale, MBDA et enfin EADS –, c’est une tempête judiciaire qui s’annonce.

Marwan Lahoud, patron d&#039;EADS international, lors d&#039;un déplacement au Kazakhstan, en compagnie d&#039;un intermédiaire.
Marwan Lahoud, patron d'EADS international, lors d'un déplacement au Kazakhstan, en compagnie d'un intermédiaire. © DR
Marwan Lahoud était directeur général délégué de la stratégie et de l’international d’EADS lorsqu’il a lui-même rencontré les intermédiaires turcs en juillet et octobre 2007, dans l’affaire chinoise. Et c’est en novembre de la même année que l’accord commercial ouvrant la voie à la vente des appareils à la Chine a été conclu, lors d’une visite de Nicolas Sarkozy à Pékin. La vente porte sur 110 avions mono-couloir (A 319, A 320 et A 321) et 50 appareils à deux allées (A 330), à livrer à la Chine entre 2011 et 2016.

Dans leur plainte, les intermédiaires précisent que les conditions de leur collaboration ont été « scellées », avec EADS en 2007, lors de « deux rencontres à l’hôtel Raphaël, avenue Kléber à Paris ». « À l’occasion du second rendez-vous, M. Marwan Lahoud rédigeait un document manuscrit, fixant en fonction du nombre d’appareils à commercialiser le montant des honoraires » qu’ils recevraient. « Ce document indique, de la main de M. Marwan Lahoud – outre ses coordonnées et mails rédigés de sa main –, le descriptif des appareils et les fourchettes de commission », assurent les plaignants.

Comme on le voit ci-dessous, ce document – obtenu par Mediapart – fixe la rétribution des intermédiaires entre 0,5 % à 2,5 % du chiffre d’affaires, selon le nombre d’appareils vendus.

Le feuillet manuscrit attribué à Marwan Lahoud. Au milieu, ses coordonnées qui, selon son entourage, seraient de sa main.
Le feuillet manuscrit attribué à Marwan Lahoud. Au milieu, ses coordonnées qui, selon son entourage, seraient de sa main. © DR
Contacté par Mediapart, l’entourage de M. Marwan Lahoud a confirmé avoir « rencontré MM. Tapan et Gursoy à deux reprises, en 2007 ». Cependant, il indique « n'avoir remis aucun document aux intermédiaires, hormis ses coordonnées sous forme manuscrite ». Comme celles figurant justement au beau milieu du document conservé par les intermédiaires.

Marwan Lahoud n’assume donc pas la paternité des fourchettes de commissions inscrites sur ce papier. « M. Marwan Lahoud prend une position pour le moins risquée, surtout s’agissant d’un document manuscrit sur deux pages, où l’écriture est bien évidemment identique, tant sur ses coordonnées que sur le reste du document », commente Me Jérôme Boursican, l’avocat des deux intermédiaires. « Si cela est nécessaire, une expertise graphologique pourra être ordonnée, (ce) qui permettra vraisemblablement de raviver la mémoire de monsieur Lahoud sur les engagements qu’il a pris pour le compte d’EADS. »

Depuis l’an 2000, et l’adoption par la France des directives anticorruption de l’OCDE, les pourcentages de commission figurant sur ce document – rapportés à ce marché – sont désormais hors normes, et toute corruption d’agents publics étrangers formellement interdite.

Pour l’heure, le groupe d’aéronautique n’a encore pas été sollicité par les enquêteurs. Mais les plaignants ont fourni d’autres documents à l’appui de leur dénonciation. Et notamment diverses conventions en bonne et due forme, signées par EADS avec DOS, la petite société des intermédiaires – dont le nom reprend les initiales des prénoms des trois hommes d’affaires, Dilsat, Okan et Sinan.

Le 25 avril 2008, le patron d’EADS Chine, Dominique Barbier, précise ainsi dans une convention de consultant qu’« EADS a décidé de solliciter l’appui et les services de DOS » qui a prouvé son « excellente capacité de lobbying » « tant auprès des compagnies aériennes qu’auprès des diverses commissions qui dirigent la République populaire chinoise ». Il ajoute que le choix de DOS par EADS a été « judicieux » puisque la France et la Chine ont signé un accord commercial (general trade agreement) lors de la visite du président français en Chine en novembre 2007. Les intermédiaires avaient au passage été chargés de surveiller les évolutions du Parti communiste chinois, lors de son 17e congrès – en octobre 2007. Ce document fait apparaître la somme de 8 millions de dollars, comme une « avance » à payer, non récupérable, représentant 0,12 % du marché.

Dans le trio d’intermédiaires, Dilsat Atus, qui disposait de hautes introductions en Chine, était initialement « employé » par les deux autres. Selon le site Intelligence Online, qui a souligné son rôle en faveur d’Airbus, Atus est « proche de la famille de Qiao Shi », ancien chef des services de sécurité sous Deng Xiaoping, puis président de l’Assemblée nationale populaire – entre 1993 et 1998. Chez Airbus, on reconnaît l’importance des introductions d’Atus à Pékin, et « l’embarras » que risque de provoquer en Chine l’éventuelle investigation le concernant.

Dilsat Atus était tellement performant qu’EADS a eu l’idée de s’associer directement avec lui, tout en remerciant les deux autres, moyennant le paiement de 2 millions de dollars chacun – et leur sortie du capital de la société DOS. C’est cette initiative qui provoque aujourd’hui la plainte et les ennuis du groupe.

Les deux intermédiaires avaient pris pour argent comptant « l’engagement » du patron d’EADS Chine « de continuer le versement régulier des commissions décrites par M. Lahoud, via des mécanismes de leasing ou autres » après leur avoir versé leurs 2 millions. Quelques années auparavant, EADS avait tenu parole lors de la vente de 34 Airbus A320 à la société Turkish Airlines, pour 2,2 milliards d’euros.

Le groupe, qui leur devait 18 millions d’euros dans l’affaire turque, avait choisi de dissimuler une partie des commissions. Fin 2005, Airbus avait ainsi « imposé » aux deux intermédiaires qu'ils lui établissent les factures « d’un projet fictif de construction de pipeline en mer Caspienne pour une valeur de près de 5 millions de dollars, projet de pipeline qui n’a jamais vu le jour ». Les intermédiaires ont communiqué à la justice ces factures fantaisistes acquittées par Airbus.

L&#039;une des fausses factures, d&#039;un million de dollars, établies à la demande d&#039;Airbus sur un projet de pipeline fantôme.
L'une des fausses factures, d'un million de dollars, établies à la demande d'Airbus sur un projet de pipeline fantôme. © DR

Dans l’affaire chinoise, les hommes d’affaires turcs restent sans nouvelles du groupe après avoir reçu 2 millions chacun, en mai 2009 et janvier 2010. Et leurs relances restent lettre morte. Ils comprennent finalement qu’ils ont été sortis du jeu, et il leur faut peu de temps pour découvrir que leur ancien associé Dilsat Atus a créé une société de leasing à Hong Kong, dont EADS est devenue partenaire en octobre 2009. Cette société, China Word Aviation Leasing (CWAL), est devenue la joint-venture de l’intermédiaire ouïghour avec le groupe d’aéronautique. L’un des bras droits de Marwan Lahoud, Olivier Brun, dirigeant de la division Service Marketing Organisation (SMO) d’EADS – chargée des « réseaux » internationaux à l’exportation – est présent au conseil d’administration de l’entité chinoise aux côtés de l’intermédiaire. Olivier Brun apparaissait déjà comme l’un des artisans financiers du contrat kazakh.

La présence au sein de CWAL d’une entité basée aux îles Caïmans (D&A Global investment group) donne à penser aux plaignants turcs que leur part de commissions s’est évaporée à destination de ce paradis fiscal, pour finir entre les mains de leur ancien associé et d’EADS. Leur plainte évoque même l’éventualité de « rétrocommissions au bénéfice d’associés ou de dirigeants de la société EADS ».

Le groupe aéronautique, de son côté, certifie que China Word Aviation Leasing a été un projet réel de développement d’une activité de leasing en Chine. Plusieurs avions auraient été achetés et loués à des compagnies d’aviation chinoises, via CWAL Irlande, mais l’affaire n’aurait généré qu’un chiffre d’affaires décevant et de maigres bénéfices. « Ce n’est pas une coquille vide, assure-t-on, même si les objectifs n’ont pas été atteints. En outre, il n’est pas interdit à Airbus de s’associer à une société basée dans un paradis fiscal. »


English Translation

Airbus is threatened by a matter of kickbacks

A contract of $ 10 billion for the delivery of 160 Airbus, signed in 2007, he has led to a system of kickbacks? Two Turkish intermediaries accuse the aerospace group. The financial police investigation. Mediapart has obtained a document manuscript attributed to number three in the group, setting the level commissions to $ 250 million.

With creditors such as these, the Airbus group fell ill. Two Turkish businessmen, Sinan Gursoy, 60, and Okan Tapan, 67, intermediate casual European aerospace group, filed a complaint in Paris last April for "breach of trust" against Airbus after having called in vain the payment of commissions they waited for the sale of 160 aircraft to China. The survey, which has been entrusted to the Financial Guard, reveals a new system of kickbacks in place to win the Chinese market.

This topic could be more embarrassing diplomatically. Manuel Valls, an official visit to China, in fact, on Thursday visited the assembly plant A320 built by the European group Taijin, near Beijing, in partnership with the Chinese. And two Turkish intermediaries, it seems, intend to reveal the face of this industrial success. They have decided to disclose some of their archives to the police and judges, including a handwritten document attributed to the director of strategy and marketing group, Marwan Lahoud, staring in 2007, the amount of commissions 2.5% of sales in the Chinese market.

During a visit to the Hotel Raphael in Paris, the leader of the group itself had put black on white the commission percentages to be paid in case of sale. This leaflet allowed two Turks to expect a reward of $ 250 million, they had to share with a third man, a Uighur through very introduced in Beijing, Dilsat Atus. Instead, they received only $ 2 million each.

These new investigations are of concern Airbus, since the intermediate archives seem to indicate illegal practices of the group in Turkey and China. Even that another criminal investigation is underway on sales of satellites and helicopters by the Airbus group in Kazakhstan in 2009 and 2010. In this case, the judges Roger Le Loire and Rene Grouman investigate the role of oligarch Patokh Chodiev and its links with several EADS leaders, chief among them Marwan Lahoud.

For the latter, which was at the head of the largest French armament groups - Aerospace, MBDA and EADS finally - is a judicial coming storm.

Marwan Lahoud, EADS International boss, during a trip to Kazakhstan, accompanied by an intermediary.
Marwan Lahoud, EADS International boss, during a trip to Kazakhstan, accompanied by an intermediary. © DR
Marwan Lahoud was appointed deputy CEO of Strategy and International EADS when he himself met with Turkish intermediaries in July and October 2007, in the Chinese case. And it was in November of the same year that the trade agreement paving the way for the sale of equipment to China was reached during a Nicolas Sarkozy's visit to Beijing. The sale includes 110 single-aisle aircraft (A 319, A 320 and A 321) and 50 aircraft with two aisles (A 330), to be delivered to China between 2011 and 2016.

In their complaint, the intermediate state that the conditions of their collaboration were "sealed" with EADS in 2007, when "two meetings at the Hotel Raphael Avenue Kléber in Paris." "On the occasion of the second meeting, Marwan Lahoud wrote a handwritten document setting based on the number of devices to market the fees" they would receive. "This paper shows, from the hand of Mr. Marwan Lahoud - besides contact information and mails written in his own hand - the description of the devices and commission bands", say the plaintiffs.

As shown below, this document - obtained by Mediapart - determine the remuneration of intermediaries between 0.5% to 2.5% of revenue, depending on the number of units sold.

The leaf manuscript attributed to Marwan Lahoud. In the middle, contact information, which in his entourage, would be of his hand.
The leaf manuscript attributed to Marwan Lahoud. In the middle, contact information, which in his entourage, would be of his hand. © DR
Contacted by Mediapart, Marwan Lahoud's entourage confirmed to have "met with Messrs. Tapan and Gursoy twice, in 2007 ". However, it says "have not given any documents to intermediaries, except contact information in handwritten form." Just like those listed in the middle of the document retained by intermediaries.

Marwan Lahoud does not assume paternity ranges of commissions listed on this paper. "Marwan Lahoud takes a position to say the least risky, especially in the case of a two-page handwritten document, where writing is obviously identical in both its coordinates on the rest of the document," commented Jérôme Me Boursican, counsel for the two intermediate. "If necessary, a handwriting expert can be ordered (that) which likely will revive the memory of Mr. Lahoud on commitments made on behalf of EADS. »

Since 2000 and the adoption by France of the OECD anti-corruption guidelines, commission percentages contained in this document - reported in this market - are now outside the norm, and corruption of foreign public officials prohibited .

For now, the aerospace group still was not solicited by the investigators. But the complainants provided additional documentation in support of their termination. Including various conventions in good and due form, signed by EADS with DOS, the small company intermediaries - whose name the initials of the first names of the three businessmen, Dilsat, Okan and Sinan.

April 25, 2008, the boss of EADS China, Dominique Barbier and accurate in a consulting agreement that "EADS has decided to seek the support and DOS services" which has proven its "excellent lobbying capacity" "as with airlines as among various committees who run the Chinese People's Republic. "He added that the choice of DOS EADS was "sensible" since France and China signed a trade agreement (general trade agreement) during the visit of French President to China in November 2007. Interim passage had been loaded to monitor developments in the Chinese Communist Party, in its 17th Congress - in October 2007. It shows the sum of $ 8 million, as "advance" to pay unrecoverable, representing 0.12% of the market.

In the intermediate trio Dilsat Atus, which had high introductions in China, was initially "employed" by the other two. According to the site Intelligence Online, which highlighted its role in favor of Airbus, Atus is "close to the family of Qiao Shi," former head of the security services under Deng Xiaoping, then president of the National People's Congress - from 1993 and 1998. at Airbus, we recognize the importance of introductions Atus in Beijing, and the "embarrassment" that may result in China concerning the possible investigation.

Dilsat Atus was so powerful that EADS had the idea to partner with him directly, while thanking the other two, on payment of $ 2 million each - and they exit the DOS company's capital. It is this initiative that causes the complaint today and troubles of the group.

The two intermediate had taken for granted "engagement" boss of EADS China "to continue the regular payment of commissions described by Mr. Lahoud, through leasing or other mechanisms" after they paid their $ 2 million. A few years ago, EADS had kept his word on the sale of 34 Airbus A320 to the company Turkish Airlines, for 2.2 billion euros.

The group, which was their € 18 million in the Turkish case, had chosen to conceal part of the commissions. End of 2005, Airbus had thus "forced" to both intermediaries to establish her bills "a fictitious project Caspian pipeline construction for a value of almost 5 million pipeline project that has never have happened. "Intermediate communicated to justice those fancy invoices paid by Airbus.

One of the false invoices, one million dollars, established at the request of Airbus on a ghost pipeline.
One of the false invoices, one million dollars, established at the request of Airbus on a ghost pipeline. © DR

In the Chinese case, the Turkish businessmen have no news of the group after receiving 2 million each in May 2009 and January 2010. And their raises unheeded. They finally understand that they were out of the game, and it takes them some time to discover that their former partner Dilsat Atus created a Hong Kong leasing company in which EADS has become a partner in October 2009. The company, China Word Aviation Leasing (CWAL), became the joint venture through Uighur with the aerospace group. One of Lahoud rights arm, Olivier Brun, head of the division Service Marketing Organization (SMO) of EADS - loaded "networks" international export - is present to the Board of Directors of the Chinese entity alongside the intermediary. Olivier Brun had already appeared as one of the architects of the Kazakh financial contract.

The presence in CWAL an entity based in the Cayman Islands (D & C Global investment group) suggests to the Turkish plaintiffs than their share of commissions evaporated to this tax haven, finally in the hands of their former partner and EADS. Their complaint even mentions the possibility of "kickbacks to the associated profit or EADS company executives."

The aerospace group, for its part, certifies that China Aviation Leasing Word was a real project of developing a leasing business in China. Several aircraft were purchased and leased to Chinese airlines, via CWAL Ireland, but the case would have generated a disappointing sales and meager profits. "This is not an empty shell, we are assured, even if the objectives have not been achieved. In addition, it is not forbidden to Airbus to partner with a company based in a tax haven

(Mediapart) Airbus is threatened by kickbacks allegations

Airbus is threatened by kickbacks allegations

A contract of $ 10 billion for the delivery of 160 Airbus, signed in 2007, he has led to a system of kickbacks? Two Turkish intermediaries accuse the aerospace group. The financial police investigation. Mediapart has obtained a document manuscript attributed to number three in the group, setting the level commissions to $ 250 million.

Exclusive - Ackman poised to win Zoetis board seats: sources

Exclusive - Ackman poised to win Zoetis board seats: sources

Thu Jan 29, 2015 4:42pm GMT


By Svea Herbst-Bayliss

BOSTON (Reuters) - Hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management is pressing for seats on animal health company Zoetis Inc's (ZTS.N) board of directors, with an eye to pushing through cost cuts and a possible merger, according to sources on both sides of the negotiations.

Pershing Square, the $18 billion fund run by activist billionaire William Ackman, became the biggest shareholder in Zoetis last year, spending about $1.54 billion for an 8.5 percent stake, and has been holding behind-the-scenes talks over the makeup of the board ahead of a Feb. 12 deadline for nominations.

Zoetis, which was spun out of Pfizer in 2013 and has been a public company for less than two years, is to report earnings on Feb. 11.

Three sources familiar with the negotiations, said Pershing Square could get two seats on the new Zoetis board. The sources asked not to be named because they are not permitted to discuss them publicly.

Two of the sources said Zoetis may increase the size of its board from nine to 11 to accommodate the Pershing Square representatives, and said the new board members could push for better cost controls and ultimately a sale to another firm. The sources said that the two sides are still talking.

Zoetis and Pershing Square declined to comment.

Ackman's approach to Zoetis is similar to increasingly popular strategies chosen by other powerful activist investors like Carl Icahn and Nelson Peltz, who have been quietly demanding changes at companies around the board room table.

Some of Ackman's past moves have been marked by more fiery public campaigns, including his efforts to convince Botox maker Allergan Inc. (AGN.N) to sell to rival Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX.TO) last year. Pershing Square was the biggest owner in Allergan, making a bet that turned out to be his firm's most profitable to date even though Allergan refused to combine with Valeant and sold itself instead to Actavis Plc (ACT.N). Pershing Square had no board seats at Allergan.

Two sources said a Pershing Square contingent on the new Zoetis board could push for a sale of Zoetis in due time. Valeant has been mentioned by industry investors as a possible buyer even though Valeant's chief executive, Michael Pearson, has denied interest in Zoetis.

They said that one of the new Zoetis board members would likely be Pershing Square partner and Ackman business school friend William Doyle, who introduced the billionaire investor to Pearson before the Allergan bet.

Doyle is a former McKinsey & Co. consultant with a science background who as a board member could provide valuable insight into possible suitors who might want to bid for Zoetis down the line, one of the sources said.

Shares of Zoetis, which has a market capitalization of $22 billion, have gained 38 percent during the company's less than two-year lifetime.

Ackman's past shows he's willing to wait for a bigger payoff. He held a stake in liquor company BEAM for 3-1/2 years, for example, before it was taken over a year ago by Suntory, yielding him a 72 percent gain.

In a letter to clients late last year, Ackman called Zoetis a "scarce asset" and compared it to BEAM.

Pershing Square, which was one of the top-performing large hedge funds in 2014, with a 38 percent return, is to hold its annual investor dinner in New York on Thursday. Some more discussion of the Zoetis investment, code-named "Superman" by Ackman's team before the investment became public, is possible.

Ackman built his stake in Zoetis at the same time that former Pershing Square analyst Scott Ferguson built a 1.6 percent stake through his hedge fund Sachem Head Capital Management.

(Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Leslie Adler)