(BFW) Volkswagen Says Chairman Piech and Wife Resign From Posts


Volkswagen Says Chairman Piech and Wife Resign From Posts
2015-04-25 16:04:06.826 GMT


By Cornelius Rahn
(Bloomberg) -- Volkswagen Chairman Ferdinand Piech is
resigning his position on the supervisory board, as well as all
other offices at the carmaker, with immediate effect, according
to statement from the company.
* Piech’s wife Ursula is also resigning all mandates
* Deputy Chairman Berthold Huber assumes Piech’s post on an
interim basis


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Cornelius Rahn in Berlin at +49-30-70010-6212 or
crahn2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Kenneth Wong at +49-30-70010-6215 or
kwong11@bloomberg.net

>>> Ariad in talks to end proxy battle, sources say

DEAL REPORTER

Ariad in talks to end proxy battle, sources say

Ariad Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ARIA) and activist investor Sarissa Capital Management are in active discussions to end a proxy fight, two people familiar with the situation said.

If an agreement is reached, it could be announced as soon as next week, they said. A settlement may include a timetable for the retirement of longtime Ariad CEO Harvey Berger, which Sarissa has demanded, the people said.

Because the talks are fluid, however, the people cautioned that there was still a possibility that the parties could fail to reach an agreement.

Greenwich, Connecticut-based Sarissa is the largest shareholder in Ariad, with a 6.85% stake. The fund is led by former Icahn Capital and Viking Global Investors portfolio manager Alex Denner, who was appointed to the Ariad board in February of last year.

Last February, Sarissa announced it would nominate three directors for Ariad’s board and that it would seek the “imminent retirement” of Berger, who has served as chairman and CEO since 1991. It also said that “any potential settlement of a potential proxy contest must include the CEO’s retirement”.

Ariad and Sarissa representatives declined to comment.

Should no agreement be reached, Sarissa will pursue its plan to run a slate of three directors for the Ariad board at its annual general meeting in coming months, said one of the people.

Sarissa’s candidates include Richard Mulligan, a Sarissa co-founder, Anna Protopapas, a former Millennium Pharmaceuticals executive, and Bernhard Ehmer, the CEO of Biotest (XETRA:BIO). They are being put forth as alternatives to CEO Berger and two others.

Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Ariad sells Iclusig, a treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia, and it is developing drugs to treat cancer and other diseases.

The company, which has a market value of USD 1.8bn, suffered a blow in October 2013 when Iclusig was pulled from the US market by the FDA for several months to change prescribing information. Its shares fell that month from USD 18.22 to as low as USD 2.20. They were trading at USD 9.78 on Friday.

(Reuters) Sky approached Mediaset to buy pay-TV unit: sources

(Reuters) - The Italian unit of Sky Plc approached Italian broadcaster Mediaset to buy its unprofitable pay-TV business Mediaset Premium but was rebuffed, according to two sources close to the matter.

However, one of the sources said on Friday informal contacts were being maintained between Sky Italia and the Italian broadcaster controlled by former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi.

Mediaset Premium last year won exclusive rights to broadcast Champions League soccer matches in Italy for an estimated 700 million euros ($760 million), stretching its cost base but giving it a powerful commercial advantage over Sky Italia.

A spokesman for Sky Italia declined to comment. "The company does not comment on rumors," he said.

A spokesman for Mediaset said he was unable to confirm the report.

Discussions over the possible sale of the pay-TV operation come at a time when the 78-year-old media tycoon Berlusconi is taking steps to reshape his business empire which also includes soccer club AC Milan.

The sources also said Qatar's Al Jazeera had resumed contacts with Mediaset over the pay-TV business. Al Jazeera was not immediately available for comment.

Last year Mediaset said it was in talks with France's Vivendi, Al Jazeera and others to cooperate in the pay-TV business. However in March this year it said negotiations had ended without success.

Mediaset currently owns 89 percent of the pay-TV unit after Spain's Telefonica bought an 11 percent stake last year in a deal that valued the whole business at 900 million euros.

Telefonica has an option to sell the stake back if Mediaset finds another partner, sources familiar with the situation said last year.

Some analyst say the Italian market is too small for two big pay-TV players such as Sky and Mediaset Premium, meaning that without a tie-up profitability could remain under pressure as costs for rights increase and consumption declines.

Revenues at Mediaset Premium fell 2.5 percent to 538.4 million euros in 2014. In March the company said the business would return to profit after reaching break even next year.

(MacRumors) iPhone 6s, Apple's next-generation iPhone, coming fall 2015

iPhone 6s, Apple's next-generation iPhone, coming fall 2015


AT A GLANCE
Apple is expected to unveil its next-generation iPhones in the fall of 2015, and they may come with some impressive camera improvements.

POSSIBLE FEATURES
A9 processor
Improved camera
Same design as iPhone 6
16 GB, 64 GB, and 128 GB capacity
Force Touch
Gold, Silver, and Space Gray colors

What We Expect

Apple's iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, released in September, have only been available for a few months, but rumors about the next-generation iPhone are already trickling in. It's likely Apple will continue its 2014 trend, offering the 2015 iPhone in two separate sizes -- one larger and one smaller.

It's not clear what Apple will call its 2015 iPhones, but Apple may stick to its long running "S" naming scheme (which has been around since 2009), calling the new phones the iPhone 6s and the iPhone 6s Plus. iPhone 6s Plus is a mouthful though, so it is possible that this might be the year that we get a new naming format. One analyst believes Apple might call its next-generation phone the "iPhone 7" due to the significance of the new changes being implemented, but it's far too early in development to know for sure.

We don't have many details on the next-generation iPhone yet, but because it's an "S" year and because the iPhone was just redesigned, it's likely the update will focus on internal improvements rather than a new external look. There may be at a couple external change, though. There's been a rumor that Apple could add a new color option to its iPhone lineup in 2015 -- pink. We've also seen a rumor suggesting Apple might opt to use the same 7000 series aluminum used in the Apple Watch in the next-generation iPhone. The aluminum is 60% stronger than standard aluminum but still lightweight.

iphone6-stock-photo
In the past, "S" upgrades have brought features like Siri, Touch ID, new processors, and camera improvements. Based on these past updates, we can assume that at the very least, the 2015 iPhones will receive new, more powerful A9 processors produced by Samsung to improve performance and some form of camera enhancement. There have also been a lot of rumors suggesting the next-generation iPhones will gain the Force Touch feature first introduced with the Apple Watch.

More RAM is also something we may see, as Apple debuted the iPad Air 2 with 2GB of RAM, up from 1GB. Many thought the iPhone 6 would see 2GB of RAM, but it did not, leaving the possibility open for the iPhone 6s.

The two new devices will also continue to offer features that have become integral to the iPhone, including Touch ID support, NFC for Apple Pay, 802.11ac Wi-Fi capabilities, and LTE Advanced.

Rumored Features

FORCE TOUCH

Several rumors have suggested the new iPhone 6s could incorporate the "Force Touch" capabilities first introduced with the Apple Watch, which is able to distinguish between a light tap and a harder press, enabling new gestures. Apple appears to be slowly adding Force Touch to its products, and recently, the company introduced both a 12-inch Retina MacBook and an updated 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro with Force Touch trackpads.

One rumor has suggested Force Touch could be limited to the iPhone 6s Plus, which is not out of the realm of possibility as the iPhone 6 Plus does have features not included in the iPhone 6. For example, the iPhone 6 Plus is the only device with optical image stabilization.

KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo believes that the next-generation iPhone will have a capacitive Force Touch sensor underneath the backlight. He claims that the hardware design of the Force Touch included in the iPhone may work differently than Force Touch in the Apple Watch and 12-inch Retina MacBook.

Instead of directly detecting the pressure applied by a finger on the screen, Force Touch hardware in the iPhone might monitor the contact area where a finger presses to determine how much pressure is being applied.

CAMERA IMPROVEMENTS

Some rumors have hinted that the iPhone 6s could bring Apple's "biggest camera jump ever" in the form of a possible two-lens system that would allow Apple to offer DSLR quality images in its iPhone, but other rumors have disagreed that Apple plans to introduce a two-lens system, sticking instead with the same 8-megapixel sensor found in previous iPhones.

Apple recently acquired LinX Imaging, a camera technology company specializing in cameras for mobile devices that are able to produce DSLR-quality images by using multi-aperture arrays.

LinX technology also introduces much-improved low-light photo taking capabilities, and due to depth mapping, it can even created 3D images from still photographs. It's possible LinX's camera technology could be used in the next-generation iPhones

.
BETTER TOUCH ID

Touch ID may even see some improvements. According to KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the iPhone 6s will feature an upgraded Touch ID module with reduced reading errors to enhance the Apple Pay experience.

A SAPPHIRE DISPLAY

iPhone 6 rumors focused heavily on a potential sapphire display that did not materialize due to production issues, and there have already been some whispers suggesting Apple will use sapphire displays produced by Foxconn for the next-generation iPhone. No new sapphire deals have come to light, though, so it is somewhat unlikely we'll see sapphire in the iPhone 6s.

4-INCH IPHONE 6C?

There have been conflicting rumors concerning the addition of a new 4-inch iPhone 6c to Apple's 2015 lineup. Several rumors coming out of the Asian supply chain have suggested there will be a newly designed 4-inch iPhone "6c" released in 2015, but other reports have called these rumors incorrect, including a recent note from reliable KGI securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. For more on the iPhone 6c rumors, check out our iPhone 6c roundup.

FT : BAE Systems considers sale of US consultancy unit


BAE Systems is weighing up a potential sale of its US consultancy division after being approached by potential bidders, Britain’s biggest defence company said on Friday.
The division — which consists of 9,000 people who advise US government agencies on IT, operations and warfare, and help the military accomplish its missions — generates about £1bn in annual revenue for BAE.

Any sale would be consistent with BAE’s strategy of increasing its focus on selling products to the private sector after cuts in defence spending by western governments.
BAE has appointed Stone Key Partners and Morgan Stanley as strategic advisers for a review of the three businesses that form part of its US consultancy division: global analysis and operations; global IT solutions; and integrated electronics and warfare systems.
BAE’s shares rose 2.3 per cent to close at 515p on Friday.
The company has been hit by several years of cuts in defence spending by the US, which is BAE’s most important market by revenue, generating almost £6bn in sales last year.
It also faces uncertainty in the UK, BAE’s second most important market, in the run-up to the May general election — because of the risk the next government could squeeze defence spending.
BAE stressed that although it was exploring a sale of its US consultancy division after interest from potential buyers, there was no certainty a disposal would go ahead.
“BAE Systems regularly reviews its business portfolio and operations to remain optimally aligned with key markets and to maximise value for customers and shareholders,” the company said.
One analyst claimed the US consultancy division had been a disappointment to BAE because it had not generated enough profit.
“There’s quite a lot of egg on BAE’s face,” the analyst said. “They puffed this business . . . it has not got particularly high margins and is not a very high quality business.”
Its US consultancy division would sit better with companies that specialised in outsourcing and facilities management, the analyst added.
BAE Systems said: “These are good, profitable businesses delivering a high single-digit return on sales.”
In February, BAE reported underlying earnings before interest, tax and amortisation of £1.7bn for 2014, down almost 12 per cent compared with 2013. Sales fell 8.5 per cent to £16.6bn.

(Barron's) U.S. Money Managers Turn Cautious



U.S. Money Managers Turn Cautious

Money managers have reined in their optimism since the fall, but they see bargains in Europe, energy, tech.



America’s money managers have developed a fear of heights. Doctors might call it acrophobia, but investors call it a logical response to a stock market that has more than doubled in the past six years, and now sits just below an all-time high. This widespread wariness is evident in Barron’s latest Big Money poll, in which a record 50% of respondents categorize themselves as neutral about the market’s prospects through year end. That’s the highest neutral reading since the spring of 2005, when 40% were sitting on the fence, and a sharp increase from last fall’s 31%.

A record 50% of Big Money managers say they are neutral about the prospects for stocks this year; 45% call themselves bullish, and 5% claim to be bears. Illustration: Scott Pollack for Barron’s

“We see more tentativeness than we did last year, and more withdrawal requests,” says Douglas MacKay, founder of Broadleaf Partners in Hudson, Ohio, with $170 million under management. “There’s just not that urgency to get in. Your average investor isn’t putting money into stocks.”

Our poll would seem to confirm as much, with 65% of managers saying that their clients are neutral on stocks, and 10% indicating they’re bearish. Chris Wang, director of research at Runnymede Capital Management in Morristown, N.J., which oversees $200 million, thinks he understands why. Wang considers himself bullish, and believes that expansionary monetary policies, corporate mergers, and share buybacks could propel stocks higher still. “But investors have reason to be cautious,” he says. “This is the sixth year of a bull market. Is the economy slowing? How soon will the Federal Reserve raise interest rates? These are questions that worry investors.”

The market’s valuation is also a concern. Seventy-one percent of Big Money managers say that stocks are fairly valued, while just 8% consider them undervalued. The Standard & Poor’s 500 is trading at 17.4 times this year’s expected earnings of $121.17, on the high side relative to its history.

While Wall Street analysts expect S&P profits to rise less than 1% this year, according to Thomson Reuters, the Big Money managers aren’t entirely pessimistic. Seventy-four percent expect earnings to increase by 1% to 5%, and 25% peg growth at 6% to 10%. Just 36% of poll respondents look for the market’s price/earnings ratio to expand in 2015, compared with 45% who see no change, and 19% who forecast multiple compression.

Robert Maynard, chief investment officer of the $15 billion Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho, or Persi, calls the market “fully valued to slightly overvalued, but not stunningly so.” He expects a combination of economic growth, stock buybacks, and dividends to produce a total return of 9% this year, or 7% on an inflation-adjusted basis.

THE BULLS’ CAMP is home to 45% of Big Money managers this spring, about on par with the spring of 2007, but down from 59% last fall. Based on their mean prediction, the bulls expect the Dow Jones industrials to rally about 4% through the middle of 2016, ending this year at 18,824, en route to 19,531. The S&P 500 similarly could tack on 8%, they estimate, hitting 2282 by June 30, 2016, while the Nasdaq Composite could add almost 7%, to 5382.

Most poll respondents are upbeat about the global economy, with 68% expecting the recovery to strengthen in the next 12 months. They look for continued growth in the U.S. economy, with 39% predicting a 2.5% increase in gross domestic product, and 42% putting GDP gains at an annualized 3% or 3.5% in the year ahead. Fourth-quarter GDP increased at an annualized rate of 2.2%; the Commerce Department will release first-quarter numbers on April 29.

Consistent with their rosier economic outlook, most Big Money managers expect an unemployment rate of 5.5% to 5%, just about half the level in 2009, in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Eighty-six percent expect the three-year-old housing recovery to continue. The housing market sent conflicting signals last week: The National Association of Realtors reported that existing-home sales rose 6.1% in March, to the highest level in 18 months, while the Commerce Department said that new-home sales fell 11.4% that month, the biggest drop in more than 18 months.

“We believe there is more juice left in the U.S. economy, and we expect it to push stock prices higher,” says Kaleialoha Cadinha-Pua’a, president and CEO of Honolulu-based Cadinha & Co., which oversees $1 billion. “The U.S. stands to deliver 3.5% GDP growth,” she adds, calling it a “safe haven” for investment assets in an increasingly risky world.

Company-specific developments, from mergers and spinoffs to buybacks and dividend hikes, also encourage the bulls. “A lot of things going on in the market give me comfort,” says David Marcus, co-founder of Evermore Global Advisors in Summit, N.J., which manages $400 million. “Big companies in the U.S. are transforming their operations, breaking up and spinning off new businesses, and focusing on their best businesses.”

Marcus, the survey’s most bullish respondent, puts the Dow at 24,700 by mid-2016, and the Nasdaq at 6,125. Lower fuel costs mean lower operating costs for companies—another plus, he says.

Robert Turner, chairman of Turner Investments in Berwyn, Pa., which manages $1 billion, has been bullish for several years and sees no reason to rein in his optimism. “To have a severe correction, you need severe excesses, and I just don’t see them,” he says. “Stocks trade at a reasonable multiple of expected earnings. Even the yield on the S&P 500 is on par with the yield on the 10-year Treasury, which doesn’t happen often.”

The S&P is yielding 1.96%, compared with the 10-year Treasury’s 1.99%.

Turner favors the work of Dan Wantrobski, a technical analyst at Janney Capital Markets in Philadelphia, who says “the expansion cycle” has much further to run. Demographics, he notes, point to a coming boom, as the 90 million members of the millennial generation approach family-formation age and start looking to buy and furnish homes. Moreover, the stock market typically has peaked at P/E multiples much higher than today’s, Wantrobski says.

THE BIG MONEY managers are most bullish about the prospects for European and U.S. stocks, and real estate. They are mostly bearish on U.S. Treasuries, U.S. corporate bonds, and commodities. More than 70% expect equities to be the best-performing asset class in the next 12 months, while 13% think that real estate will lead the pack.

The managers see the biggest investment opportunities in energy, European, and technology stocks, and the greatest risks in bonds, biotechs, and emerging-market stocks. They expect consumer cyclicals, health care, energy, financials, and technology to perform best among S&P 500 sectors, although, to be fair, a fourth of the managers look for energy stocks to bring up the rear.

The Big Money pros see little change in oil prices this year; their mean forecast for West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S. benchmark, is $54.45 a barrel, compared with a recent spot price of $57.74. Gold, too, has relatively few fans in this crowd, with poll respondents looking for the metal to end the year around $1,170 an ounce, below last week’s $1,178.

Nearly half of the Big Money managers say Europe will be the best-performing stock market in the next 12 months—and that’s after European shares, as measured by the Stoxx Europe 600 index, have rallied 20% this year, in tandem with the European Central Bank’s $1 trillion bond-buying program. Marcus, of Evermore, notes that the euro’s collapse in the past year, relative to the dollar, is bringing an export advantage to European multinationals.

The common currency slid from $1.39 in May 2014 to $1.07 last week, and 70% of Big Money managers expect the downward trend to persist.

Jason Norris, executive vice president of research at Portland, Ore.–based Ferguson Wellman Capital Management, with $4.2 billion in assets, says he has been scouring European markets for bargains. “U.S. markets have outperformed global markets by 70% these past few years,” he says. “Investors expect some reversion to the mean. Easy money in Europe promises higher equity prices, [whereas] the U.S. is on the verge of tightening monetary policy.”

The valuation differential also is a draw, he says, noting that European equities trade for roughly 15 times expected earnings.

BARRON’S CONDUCTS the Big Money poll every spring and fall, with the help of Beta Research in Syosset, N.Y. The latest survey, e-mailed in late March, drew responses from 143 money managers across the country, representing some of the nation’s largest investment firms and pension funds, as well as many smaller investment boutiques.

What might send U.S. stocks sharply higher in the next 12 months? Nearly half of the managers cite rising corporate profits, while 22% point to a lack of action by the Federal Reserve. Most Big Money managers expect the central bank to begin raising short-term interest rates in the fourth quarter of 2015 or first-quarter 2016—a view that much of the rest of Wall Street also has adopted in the past month, based on recent, less-than-stellar economic reports. This will mark the first change in the Fed’s rate target since December 2008, and the first increase since June 2006.

Only 25% of respondents expect the stock market to slide in the six months following the Fed’s tightening, while 55% predict that stocks will rise. A majority of managers predict that the 10-year Treasury bond will yield 2.5% or 3% a year from now, although 27% see little change from today’s near-2%. Looking out five years, however, more than 40% expect the 10-year to yield 4% or more.

With interest rates at historic lows—and government bond yields negative in key European markets—the managers are split as to whether their fixed-income portfolios will generate positive returns this year. Fifty-six percent say that the U.S. bond market is exhibiting bubble characteristics, although that doesn’t mean a correction is near. “There is a bond bubble unless the Fed says otherwise,” one manager said in write-in comments. “If the Fed continues to suppress yields, there is no bubble. If the Fed does what it should, bond prices will fall as fast as the Fed will allow.”

Interest-rate suppression will end, “but the start date has been pushed out, and many now believe the process will take longer than originally expected,” wrote poll respondent John Boland, a principal with Maple Capital Management, a $650 million-in-assets firm in Montpelier, Vt., in a recent newsletter.

Boland describes a difficult backdrop filled with “troubling disconnects.” Corporate profits are going down, he notes, but people are calling for stock prices to go up. At the same time, the flow of earnings news could bring more stock-price volatility. Boland, who labels himself neutral, looks for the Dow Jones industrials to hit 18,750 by year end, but retreat to 17,000 in the first half of 2016.

A MERE 5% of the Big Money men and women are self-described bears today, down from 10% six months ago. The higher the market has climbed, it seems, the more ambivalent erstwhile bears have grown.

While more than 75% of the managers think stocks will correct by at least 10% in the next 12 months, most likely driven lower by a geopolitical crisis or earnings shock, the bears are a class apart: They don’t see a rebound thereafter. To the contrary, they expect the Dow to slide 7% by the middle of next year, to 16,788. The S&P 500 could fall 8%, to 1935, in that span, they say, and the Nasdaq could give up 8%, to 4633.

“We look for negative returns in the coming months,” says David Villa, chief investment officer of the $105 billion State of Wisconsin Investment Board. “We’ve had a really strong run in the U.S. All the talk of rates going up at the end of the year will reverse momentum.” Villa asserts that U.S. equities are 10% overvalued, while European stocks are attractive. “For example, we really like European grocers, but find North American grocers’ shares unattractive,” he says. Villa expects the Dow to tumble to 17,250 by year end, but rebound to 18,630 in the first half of 2016.

Ralph Segall, a principal with Chicago-based Segall, Bryant & Hamill, with $9.7 billion under management, projects the Dow will fall as low as 16,800 by the end of this year, and climb back to 17,500 by June 2016. The selloff could be driven by earnings disappointments and the expectation of higher interest rates, he says. Segall sees particular risk in passive investment products, such as index funds and exchange-traded funds, which have garnered huge popularity in the bull market. They could quickly lose ground as the market grows more volatile.

“The public and institutions sound as convinced about the virtues of indexing as they did about the virtues of tech investing at the height of the bubble,” he comments. “It will all end badly, I fear.”

DESPITE THEIR concern about the market’s advance to rarified heights, the Big Money pros find plenty of stocks to like. Their top picks this spring include Apple (ticker: AAPL),Dow Chemical (DOW), American Airlines Group (AAL), Celgene (CELG), and General Motors (GM), among others.

Dow Chemical shares have been relatively flat for the past year, and recently closed at $51. But David Becker, president of Northern Oak Wealth Management in Milwaukee, which manages $630 million, has a $60 target price. He expects earnings per share to rise 20% in 2016 and 2017, and lauds management’s efforts to shift to higher-margin, noncyclical businesses from commodity chemicals.

Dow pays an annual dividend of $1.68, and yields 3.33%. The company also has a buyback program. Technically, says Becker, the stock is breaking out of a consolidation phase that lasted more than a decade.

As much as investors like dividend payments—Dow Chemical’s have been on the rise for the past four years—they also see other compelling uses for corporate cash. For example, 35% of Big Money respondents think capital spending is the best use of corporate cash today, and 11% favor acquisitions. That compares with 34% who regard dividend payments as the best investment, and 20% who prefer buybacks.

The managers see a lot of froth in biotech stocks, but Celgene, a $95 billion-market-cap giant, could be a smart way to play the industry’s rapid growth. Spun out of chemical maker Celanese in 1986, Celgene is best known for cancer treatments, and has one of the broadest pipelines in the biotech business. The company bought a number of small biotech outfits, and shareholder-friendly management has actively repurchased shares.

At a recent $116, Celgene trades for 19 times next year’s expected earnings of $6.32 a share. Geoffrey Porges, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, has a price target of $155 a share, and says the stock is “set up nicely to rally.”

GM is a favorite of William Harnisch, president of Peconic Partners, which oversees $533 million in assets. The auto maker’s shares are trading around $36, or for a well-below-market valuation of seven times estimated 2016 earnings of $5.17 a share. Harnisch thinks the stock is worth at least $50, and says the market has yet to see past the company’s recent recall problems.

Nor do investors understand just how well GM is doing in truck manufacturing, he adds. In many ways, Harnisch says, GM is a stealth technology company, and a leader in computer-enhanced “connected” vehicles designed for superior performance and safety.

Robert Medway, a principal in New York’s Royal Capital Management, which manages about $100 million, prefers lesser-known stocks, and says relatively high valuations have forced bargain hunters to move into “special situations and orphan stocks that trade down because of some basic misunderstanding or disagreement.”

McDermott International (MDR), an oil-infrastructure specialist, is one example, he says. The stock was hit most recently by the plunge in oil prices, but the company has stable long-term contracts with prime producers, Medway notes.

ASK ANY GROUP of people what they think of Apple, and opinions of its products and stock will be mixed. While 81% of Big Money respondents view the company favorably, and some call its stock a favorite, others label the shares among the market’s most overvalued.

The managers also consider Tesla Motors (TSLA), Amazon.com (AMZN), Facebook(FB), and the casual-dining chain Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) to be among the market’s most overvalued names, as they did last fall, even though Tesla and Chipotle have fallen 4% and 1% since late October, and Facebook is up 9%. Amazon is another story; it’s up 28% in the past six months, to $390, and fetches a cool 165 times next year’s expected earnings.

Chipotle trades for a comparatively reasonable 31 times estimated profits, but that is too rich by far for James Pappas, chief investment officer of James Pappas Investment Counsel, which manages $30 million in Longboat Key, Fla. “This is not a cure for cancer; it is a burrito chain whose growth is starting to slow,” he says.

Pappas notes that Chipotle’s $19.7 billion stock market capitalization values each of its 1,800 stores at a lofty $12 million. The restaurants produce an annual profit of $250,000 each. Viewed another way, that’s just a 2% return, akin to the 10-year Treasury yield, but with a lot more risk.

Pappas expects the Dow to hold steady for the rest of this year at about 18,000, before climbing to 19,200 by mid-2016—an implied gain of just under 7%.

POLITICS ARE HARD to escape these days, even if you try. What happens in the Capitol, and on the hustings, is of keen interest to the nation’s investment managers, especially given Washington’s growing influence on Wall Street. If the Big Money folks could write the script, 39% would like to see the White House and Congress focus most urgently on tax reform, and presumably on lowering the nation’s corporate tax rate.

Another 29% argue that reform of entitlement programs is the top priority, while 11% contend it is reductions in federal spending. Only 6% consider immigration reform the most pressing issue before Congress.

At this early juncture, 79% of Big Money managers expect Hillary Clinton to be the Democrats’ candidate for president in 2016. Just half of poll respondents think Jeb Bush will carry the banner for the Republicans, with another 20% putting high odds on Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. No matter who runs, 66% predict that the Republican candidate will win.

The markets could look a lot different—or not—by the time the next president reports for duty. In the meantime, the nation’s professional money managers have their work cut out, especially given stocks’ valuation and the uncertainty surrounding the Fed’s next rate move. Eighty-two percent of Big Money managers say they’re beating the market this year—a good batting average. We’ll let you know how they’re doing, and what they’re thinking, when we check back with them in the fall.

(Barron's) Petrobras Looks Fully Priced

Petrobras Looks Fully Priced
The hobbled Brazilian oil giant’s stock accurately reflects some good news and the substantial risks it still faces.

Bad news has become good news for Brazil’s Petrobras.

Otherwise known as Petróleo Brasileiro (ticker: PBR), the state-controlled oil producer and refiner has been embroiled in a corruption scandal that has netted scores of company insiders, politicians, and contractors. The investigation isn’t over yet, but auditors and the Petrobras board finally agreed last week on much-delayed results for 2014. The net result: a loss of $7.4 billion, or 56 cents per U.S.-traded share, following a huge impairment charge of $16.7 billion.

Petrobras shares, however, rallied 13% last week to a recent $9.95, contributing to a 36% climb so far this year. The shares are still down a lot over a 12-month span, and, by some measures, the valuation is attractive. But the recent gains have made the stock pretty fully valued in light of the potential for more problems. We’d steer clear.

The $7.4 billion figure included only $2.5 billion in corruption-related losses, much less than some analysts expected. But the book is not closed on the multiyear Car Wash scheme, in which contractors and Petrobras leaders allegedly conspired to rig bids and pocket money. Witnesses are still taking the stand. The company reports first-quarter results in May. Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff, who headed the Petrobras board for a time and has denied any knowledge of the scheme, is still vulnerable; protesters have demanded impeachment proceedings.

AS BIG A PRICE as the company has paid, it remains laden with more than $130 billion in debt. Petrobras corralled some $12 billion in loans from entities including the China Development Bank in recent weeks, and that should help cover 2015 obligations. By releasing results for 2014 before April 30, Petrobras averted a disaster in which debt would have come due early, and it can reopen the door to capital markets. But spending less on exploration—Petrobras’ oil riches are buried beneath deepwater salt beds—means future profits will suffer.

Petrobras plans to sell assets worth roughly $14 billion in 2015 and 2016. It won’t pay a dividend this year, which is of no matter to the traders and short-sellers who have battled over the stock in the past year.

The collapse in oil prices—the international Brent benchmark is hovering near $64.85 per barrel—affects the entire industry, but Petrobras’ retrenchment is austere, writes Raymond James Analyst Pavel Molchanov.

The shares do hold some appeal. Petrobras’ price/earnings ratio is about 10 times estimated 2015 earnings, while companies in the iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF (EWZ) trade at above 16 times. The broader MSCI Emerging Markets index trades at about 13 times.

But Esty Dwek, global strategist at Loomis Sayles Investments in London, tells Barron’s via e-mail that much of the good news appears priced in.

“Head winds remain, which will keep volatility elevated going forward,” writes Dwek. “The impairment charge was lower than most estimates, but the asset sales planned remain hurdles…ongoing questions about the company’s credit rating and whether it remains investment grade are likely to keep uncertainty high. The road ahead remains long for Petrobras, and it is unlikely to be smooth.”

Ultimately, this crisis could make Petrobras more shareholder friendly. If oil prices rise, so will the stock. For now, the mistrust runs about as deep as its oil assets, some of which may have to be sold to the highest bidder.

(Barron's) Market Winners and Losers in the U.K. Election

Market Winners and Losers in the U.K. Election
Postelection winners could be telecoms, like BT. Utilities could be at risk.

The United Kingdom goes to the polls May 7 with the outcome more unpredictable than at any election in recent memory. No single party is likely to win enough support to govern alone, so the country seems destined for days or even weeks of political horse-trading while parties haggle over the composition of a new coalition.

Uncertainty spells bad news for the markets. London’s benchmark FTSE 100 index has climbed a respectable 7% in 2015, and the FTSE 250, which is a more accurate indicator of the domestic market, is ahead almost 10%. But their performances have been overshadowed by headline-grabbing double-digit gains in Europe, stoked by loose monetary policy and a weakening common currency.

Most investment banks recommend an Underweight position on U.K. equities, and investors could do well to stay on the sidelines while the politics play out. The Conservative Party, which has governed in coalition with the Liberal Democrats for the past five years, may have a narrow edge on its rivals. As the election date nears, the party, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, could pick up enough support from uncommitted voters to forge a new alliance.

For investors, it could be the best outcome. Conservative policies are more business-friendly than those of their rivals. Michael Spencer, chief executive of interdealer brokerage ICAP (ticker: IAP.UK) and a former Conservative Party treasurer, earlier this month warned he could relocate his company outside the U.K. if Labour wins the election. Of course, he could be scaremongering.

THE CONSERVATIVES and Labour are expected to win the biggest shares of the 650 seats up for grabs, but opinion polls indicate neither will surpass 325, which would secure an outright majority. Economic hardship and political disaffection have siphoned support to minority parties, bringing to an end for now the era of one-party rule.

Despite dwindling support for the Liberal Democrats, the Conservatives could scrape together enough backing from other parties to cobble together an administration. It probably wouldn’t be the most stable, however.

Cameron and treasury chief George Osborne won plaudits for returning the economy to growth after a crushing recession. Gross domestic product last year expanded 2.8%, more than twice the 1.3% average for the European Union. But austerity measures proved painful and unpopular.

An alternative could be a Labour-led coalition with support from the Scottish Nationalist Party. Riding high on a hard-fought but ultimately unsuccessful referendum for Scottish independence, the SNP could gain enough seats to be kingmaker.

What would be the price of SNP backing? It could be more money for investment in Scotland, or even another shot at independence.

Regardless of the makeup of the next administration, one of its priorities will be addressing a current-account deficit equivalent to 5.5% of GDP, the largest among the Group of Seven nations, and a budget deficit of 5.3%.

The Conservatives are looking to balance the books by 2020. They would keep tax revenue constant while reducing government spending in a return to austerity. Labour pledges to reduce the budget deficit every year. It says it will trim public spending but not as aggressively as the Conservatives, and it will increase tax revenue by closing loopholes and reversing a top-rate cut for high earners. Austerity and higher taxes won’t go down well. With borrowing costs so low, the best course could be to push back the timetable for getting the books to tally, thereby easing the pain.

Another issue for the new government could be the U.K.’s membership in the European Union. Cameron has promised to hold a referendum in 2017 if the Conservatives are re-elected. A U.K. exit from the EU is unthinkable, but a risk, nonetheless.

That casts a long shadow over the British pound, which has fallen in value against the dollar in the run-up to the vote. Sterling traded at $1.513 Friday, down 2.6% against the dollar in 2015. An interest-rate rise, likely in the second half of 2015, could slow the currency’s decline. And with high employment and rising wages, more incremental hikes can be expected.

A CONSERVATIVE WIN could benefit St. James Place (STJ.UK), which provides high-end wealth-management services, because the party won’t raise taxes on high-net-worth individuals. Insurer Prudential (PRU.UK) could profit from a weaker pound. It generates about 45% of operating profit before tax in the U.K., and is also raising its Asian exposure.

Utilities could be vulnerable if Labour wins. The party has said it would seek a price freeze on utility bills. Telecoms, however, may avoid additional regulation. Both parties recognize the importance to the U.K. of an advanced 4G and fiber infrastructure. BT Group (BTA.UK) may be a clear winner.

NY Post : FTC expected to approve $27B tobacco deal

Big Tobacco can breathe easy.
The Federal Trade Commission is expected to approve Reynolds American’s $27 billion purchase of Lorillard by a vote of four to one, despite the objections of some agency staff, The Post has learned.
The deal will combine the second- and third-largest cigarette makers, and two of the three most popular brands among young adults, Newport and Camel.
Regulatory approval will clear the way for a three-way transaction that will reshape the tobacco industry. Reynolds and Lorillard also agreed to sell five brands for $7 billion to Imperial.
While there was some skepticism the FTC would approve the deal, the companies argued that the sale of Winston, Kool and other smaller brands would build Imperial into a strong No. 3 player.
Imperial, which has little presence in the US, also persuaded regulators that it can build its business here based on its success overseas, a source said.
While antitrust officials have looked askance at other mega-mergers in the cable and food industries, tobacco is an already tightly controlled industry that generates huge tax revenue.
Even so, critics have called on regulators to block the deal, in part because of concerns about marketing tobacco to children.
Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, warned last year that the merger could “increase the power of these companies to market to kids.”
Reynolds did not return calls. The FTC declined comment.