(BFW) *TIWEL IS OBLIGED TO MAKE MANDATORY OFFER TO BUY ALL SULZER SHRS


BN 08/03 05:04 *SULZER SAYS OFFERED PRICE WILL NOT INCLUDE PREMIUM
BN 08/03 05:02 *SULZER SAYS INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE WILL REVIEW TENDER OFFER
BN 08/03 05:01 *TIWEL IS OBLIGED TO MAKE MANDATORY OFFER TO BUY ALL SULZER SHRS
BN 08/03 05:01 *TIWEL HOLDING IS OBLIGED TO MAKE MANDATORY OFFER
BN 08/03 05:00 *RENOVA GROUP'S STAKE EXCEEDS 33 1/3%

*TIWEL IS OBLIGED TO MAKE MANDATORY OFFER TO BUY ALL SULZER SHRS
2015-08-03 05:05:36.227 GMT

--NADINE SKOCZYLAS

-0- Aug/03/2015 05:05 GMT

(BFW) Nokia to Sell HERE to German Carmakers for EU2.8b


MORE: Nokia to Sell HERE to German Carmakers for EU2.8b
2015-08-03 05:29:06.973 GMT


By Claudia Rach
(Bloomberg) -- BMW, Daimler, Audit will hold equal stake in
HERE, none of them seeks majority interest, BMW says in
statement.

* BMW sees HERE deal closing in 1Q 2016
* Nokia says to focus on merger with Alcatel-Lucent
* HERE 1H op profit EU28m
* HERE defined liabilities seen “slightly” below EU300m
* HERE to operate as co. business until transaction closes
* Nokia statement
* NOTE: Nokia to sell HERE to BMW, Audi, Daimler for EU2.8b

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Claudia Rach in Berlin at +49-30-70010-6219 or
crach1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-3525-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net

>>> Asian Update

Asian Mid-session Update: China manufacturing PMIs hit multi-month lows

***Economic Data***
- (CN) CHINA JULY MANUFACTURING PMI: 50.0 (5-month low) V 50.1E; NON-MANUFACTURING PMI: 53.9 (5-month high) V 53.8 PRIOR
- (CN) CHINA JULY CAIXIN/MARKIT MANUFACTURING PMI: 47.8 V 48.3E; ( 5th month of contraction and 2-year low)
- (JP) JAPAN JULY FINAL MANUFACTURING PMI: 51.2 V 51.4 PRELIM
- (KR) SOUTH KOREA JULY MANUFACTURING PMI: 47.6 V 46.1 PRIOR
- (KR) SOUTH KOREA JUNE CURRENT ACCOUNT: $12.2B V $8.6B PRIOR
- (AU) AUSTRALIA JUL ANZ JOB ADVERTISEMENTS M/M: -0.4% V +1.2% PRIOR
- (AU) AUSTRALIA JUN HIA NEW HOME SALES M/M: +0.5% V -2.3% PRIOR
- (AU) AUSTRALIA JUL TD SECURITIES INFLATION M/M: 0.2% V 0.1% PRIOR; Y/Y: 1.6% (8-month high) V 1.5% PRIOR
- (AU) AUSTRALIA JULY CORELOGIC RPDATA HOUSE PRICES M/M: +2.8% V +2.1% PRIOR
- (AU) AUSTRALIA JUL AIG MANUFACTURING INDEX: 50.4 V 44.2 PRIOR
- (ID) INDONESIA JULY MANUFACTURING PMI: 47.3 V 47.8 PRIOR

***Index Snapshot (as of 02:30 GMT)***
- Nikkei225 -0.5%, S&P/ASX -0.4%, Kospi -0.8%, Shanghai Composite -1.4%, Hang Seng -0.8%, Sept S&P500 -0.1% at 2,097

***Commodities/Fixed Income***
- Dec gold -0.2% at $1,092/oz, Sept crude oil -0.7% at $46.81/brl, Sept copper -0.4% at $2.35/lb
- (JP) BOJ offers to buy ¥70B in JGBs with maturity less than 1-yr, ¥240B in 10-25yr JGBs, and ¥140B in JGBs with maturity over 25-yr

***Market Focal Points/FX***
- Asian markets are tracking the selloff in US markets on Friday to the downside, though the soft economic data in the month-turning PMI-filled session are also weighing on sentiment. China markets are seeing particularly steep losses, entering midday break with down nearly 2.5%. Over the weekend the official manufacturing PMI hit 5-month lows, with notable deterioration in Output, Backlog, and Input Prices components. Official non-manufacturing PMI rose a decimal to a 5-month high, however the SME-centril Caixin out on Monday was also a disappointment at a 2-year low. Markit economist said the data "signalled that both domestic and foreign demand had softened in the latest survey period, as highlighted by new export work also falling in July after a slight pick up in June (as) employment fell due to company down-sizing policies that were implemented in light of softer client demand (and) average input costs faced by Chinese manufacturing companies declined again and the rate of reduction accelerated to the sharpest seen since April." Over the weekend, PBoC research director warned that China economy would remain under pressure in H2, while regulators announced an inquiry for some of the China-owned brokers' trading records in Hong Kong and Singapore to seek out the culprits behind "malicious" short selling.

- In other key economic datapoints Japan PMI remained in expansion, albeit slightly lower than the preliminary levels. Economists noted growth in new orders resumed, supporting further increases in both output and employment with "stronger demand conditions and the securing of new clients leading to the latest expansion." In Australia, TD inflation gauge hit a 8-month high and home sales bounced while labor market tightened amid sequential decline of jobs advertisements. Reserve Bank of Australia is on tap with a rate decision upcoming in tomorrow's session and widely expected to keep rates unchanged at 2.00%.

- With Greek bourses set to reopen, there was more backlash against German hardliners pushing Athens to the brink of euro exit. France Fin Min Sapin said Germany was wrong to propose a Grexit, and even Bundesbank member Buch said the discussion of Grexit was "tiring". Separate report in Greek press indicating the govt will seek €24B in the first tranche of the bailout aid as part of the €86B program, as negotiations are expected to conclude later this month.

***Equities***
- Consumer discretionary: Huafu Top Dyed Melange Yarn Co 002042.CN +1.7% (H1 result)
- Financials: Xiandai Investment Co 000900.CN +0.6% (H1 result); Mizuho Financial Group 8411.JP -1.6% (Q1 result); Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group 8306.JP -1.9% (Q1 result); Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group 8316.JP -1.2% (Q1 result)
- Industrials: Hebei Sailhero Environmental Protection High-tech Co 300137.CN +5.2%, Beijing SDL Technology Co 002658.CN +10.0% (Beijing selected to host 2022 winter Olympics); Xi'an Tian He Defense Technology Co 300397.CN -10.0% (H1 result); Fuji Heavy Industries 7270.JP -3.7% (Q1 result); Aisin Seiki Co 7259.JP -3.8% (Q1 result); Mitsubishi Heavy Industries 7011.JP +0.6% (Q1 result); Honda Motor Co 7267.JP +8.3% (Q1 result); Sumitomo Chemical Co 4005.JP -6.1% (Q1 result)
- Energy: Tap Oil TAP.AU -5.6% (strategic review); JX Holdings 5020.JP -3.8% (Q1 result)
- Materials: Citic Resources 1205.HK -3.3% (H1 result); Atlas Iron AGO.AU +5.7% (Q4 result)
- Healthcare: Jiangzhong Pharmaceutical Co. 600750.CN -7.2% (H1 result); Zhejiang NHU Co Ltd 002001.CN -1.0% (H1 result)
- Technology: Sharp Corp 6753.JP +1.2% (Q1 result, to exit TV business in Americas)

(BFW) Avenue’s Lasry Says It’s a Good Time to Buy European Bank Debt



Avenue’s Lasry Says It’s a Good Time to Buy European Bank Debt
2015-08-02 18:16:50.337 GMT


By Freeman Klopott
(Bloomberg) -- Banks are under pressure from European
Central Bank to deleverage and reduce their debt, billionaire
co-founder of Avenue Capital Group Marc Lasry said on “Wall
Street Week” on Sunday.

* “When you’ve got regulatory pressure to sell, you’ve got
to sell”: Lasry

* “Now, we’re buying from people who are selling more because
they’re being forced to, as opposed to why they think it’s a
good decision”: Lasry
* As result, he said he’s able to buy debt for 60c to 70c,
gets par in return after restructuring over 2 to 3 yrs

Story Link:NSN NSGVLK6JTSE8<GO>


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Freeman Klopott in Albany at +1-518-426-9921 or
fklopott@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Andrea Snyder at +1-202-624-1831 or
asnyder5@bloomberg.net
Joe Sabo

>>> Former Greece Fin Min Varoufakis: Spain may become the next Greece if it has

Former Greece Fin Min Varoufakis: Spain may become the next Greece if it has to deal with the same austerity policies - Spanish press 
- Says: "Spaniards need to look at their own economic and social situation and based on that evaluate what their country needs, independently of what happens in Greece or wherever... The danger of becoming Greece is always there and it will become reality if the same mistakes that were imposed on Greece are repeated."

WSJ : KKR Founder Jerome Kohlberg Dies at 90

KKR Founder Jerome Kohlberg Dies at 90
Financier was an architect of the leveraged buyout and built a leading private-equity firm with Henry Kravis and George Roberts

Jerome Kohlberg, an architect of the leveraged buyout and co-founder of private-equity giant KKR & Co., has died. He was 90.Jerome Kohlberg, an architect of the leveraged buyout and co-founder of private-equity giant KKR & Co., has died. He was 90.

Mr. Kohlberg died at his Martha’s Vineyard home on Thursday after a long battle with cancer, according to Kohlberg & Co., the firm he founded after he left KKR in 1987.

“Jerry led an amazing life and leaves a tremendous legacy in business, philanthropy and family,” Samuel P. Frieder, Kohlberg & Co.’s managing partner, said in a note to the firm’s investors on Friday.

Mr. Kohlberg died at his Martha’s Vineyard home on Thursday after a long battle with cancer, according to Kohlberg & Co., the firm he founded after he left KKR in 1987.

“Jerry led an amazing life and leaves a tremendous legacy in business, philanthropy and family,” Samuel P. Frieder, Kohlberg & Co.’s managing partner, said in a note to the firm’s investors on Friday. 

Mr. Kohlberg founded Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. in 1976 with Henry Kravis and George Roberts. The three men, who worked together in Bear, Stearns & Co.’s corporate-finance division, launched the firm with just $120,000 in capital, according to the book “Merchants of Debt: KKR and the Mortgaging of American Business,” by former Wall Street Journal reporter George Anders.
“Jerry was a real visionary, having played an important role in developing the private equity model in the 1960s, and he was a true mentor to George Roberts and me,” Mr. Kravis said in a statement emailed on Saturday.

While at Bear Stearns, Mr. Kohlberg developed the so-called bootstrap deal, a type of buyout of companies owned by older founders. The structure allowed families to avoid huge estate taxes upon the founder’s death while still keeping a stake in the business.

In the early 1970s, Mr. Kohlberg expanded the bootstrap deal to buy the unwanted units of old-line industrial companies that made products like bricks and wires, a history chronicled in the 1990 book “Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco.” He used banks loans to cover a large portion of the purchase price, much the same way a family would use a mortgage to buy a house.

After its founding, KKR began targeting bigger fish. The firm completed the first buyout of a major publicly traded company in 1979.

KKR grew rapidly in its first 10 years amid the takeover boom of the 1980s. By 1985, it accounted for about a third of the entire leveraged buyout business, the Journal reported in 1986. It did $6 billion worth of deals that year, including the buyouts of broadcaster Storer Communications Inc. and Union Texas Petroleum, the firm’s first foray into the energy industry.

The next year, KKR completed the largest leveraged buyout then on record: the $6.2 billion acquisition of Chicago-based food and consumer products company Beatrice Cos.

As KKR’s star climbed, Mr. Kohlberg grew uneasy with his partners’ desire to pursue companies more aggressively, according to a 1988 Journal article. A champion of friendly deals, he also was wary of Mr. Kravis’s plan to begin quietly buying small stakes in target companies.

Mr. Kohlberg left the firm in 1987. “It was a divorce,” a friend of all three men told the Journal. Their disagreements “just caused them to grow apart.”

Mr. Roberts in a statement emailed on Saturday said he and Mr. Kravis are “proud that our firm’s name is Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. Jerry will be missed and remembered by many.”

Mr. Kohlberg and his son, James Kohlberg, founded Kohlberg & Co., which went on to specialize in buying midsize companies. He also continued to invest in KKR’s deals, including the $25 billion RJR Nabisco buyout, according to “Merchants of Debt.”

In 1989, Mr. Kohlberg sued KKR, claiming Messrs. Kravis and Roberts illegally reduced his stake in four companies KKR bought between 1979 and 1985. The suit was later settled and terms weren’t revealed.

Mr. Kohlberg continued to keep a low profile after leaving KKR. A father of four, he was a “homebody” who “dressed simply, led a quiet family life, and spent his free time playing tennis or reading thick volumes of fiction or biography,” Bryan Burrough and John Helyar wrote in “Barbarians at the Gate.”

He retired from Kohlberg & Co. in 1994. His son, James, is the firm’s chairman but devotes most of his time to outside activities including venture capital investments, according to the firm’s website.

An active philanthropist, Mr. Kohlberg supported a broad array of causes with his wife, Nancy, but they shunned public announcements of their donations. “If you put your name on a building, you feel a little self-conscious, a little tasteless,” Mr. Kohlberg told the Journal for a 2008 story on anonymous giving.

Still, he was passionate about the causes he supported. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, Mr. Kohlberg took up the cause of people who were in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure and worked with banks to get troubled loans refinanced, he told the Vineyard Gazette, the Martha’s Vineyard newspaper he bought in 2010.

He also was a longtime supporter of an effort to change campaign finance laws.

Mr. Kohlberg, who served in the Navy during World War II, urged lawmakers to beef up the GI Bill to fully fund the education of veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In a 2008 Wall Street Journal op-ed, he credited the GI Bill with allowing him to earn a bachelor’s degree from Swarthmore College, a business degree from Harvard University and a law degree from Columbia University.

“I deeply believe that we have a moral responsibility to provide today’s returning veterans with the same educational opportunities that my generation received,” he wrote.

>>> IHG mulling bids for Movenpick, Fairmont; IHG’s talks with Starwood failed d

IHG mulling bids for Movenpick, Fairmont; IHG’s talks with Starwood failed due to regulatory concerns 

InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG) is mulling takeover offers for Canadian rival Fairmont and Swiss competitor Movenpick, The Sunday Times reported. The newspaper cited insiders who said IHG had yet to decide whether to approach either target. IHG’s management team is “conservative” and would not be drawn into an expensive bid battle, according to one source cited by the newspaper.

IHG, an FTSE-100 hotels operator, on 30 July said it was not in discussions regarding an offer for Stamford, Connecticut-based rival Starwood Hotels and Resorts [NYSE:HOT]. The denial followed a Financial Times report the same day that said IHG and Starwood were in preliminary talks about a deal, with Bank of America Merrill Lynch advising IHG on the talks.

The Sunday Times cited senior City sources who said Starwood and IHG had talks earlier in the year regarding a potential deal. The discussions did not go any further due to regulatory problems, the sources added.

The article noted talk that Starwood is now conducting a formal sale process. Insiders cited by the newspaper said the French hotels operator Accor and Parsippany, New Jersey-based counterpart Wyndham Worldwide (NYSE:WYN) are interested in in buying Starwood.

Fairmont began a sale process this year with Deutsche Bank advising, the report said. The Qatar government holds a majority stake in Fairmont.

Insiders cited by the report said IHG would be competing against sovereign wealth funds from Asia if it decided to make offers for Movenpick and Fairmont.

IHG refused to comment, while Movenpick and Fairmont did not reply when asked for comment, the article said. Deutsche Bank refused to comment, according to the report.

InterContinental Hotel Group’s market capitalisation stood at GBP 6.37bn (EUR 9.06bn) at the close of trading in London on Friday, 31 July.
Sunday Times

>>> RSA Insurance board holding out for 600p per share offer from Zurich

RSA Insurance board holding out for 600p per share offer from Zurich 

RSA Insurance Group’s board is believed to be holding out for a takeover bid from Zurich Insurance Group for a minimum of 600p per share, The Sunday Telegraph reported. The newspaper do not cite a source for the claim.

Zurich last week confirmed that it was thinking about making an offer for RSA, an FTSE 100 Insurance company. Reports last week said Zurich was considering an offer of 550p per share, the item noted.

An offer at 550p per share would be more than 20% higher than RSA’s undisturbed share price prior to the emergence of takeover speculation, the item said. The report noted, however, that FTSE takeover targets have typically commanded 30% premiums, with recent deals involving casualty and property insurers being agreed at premiums of more than 40%.

Is it is likely, therefore, that Zurich would need to increase its offer to secure the RSA board’s backing, the article said.

The investment banks Goldman Sachs and Robey Warshaw are advising RSA, the report said. The advisers are now focusing on a valuation of RSA, according to the newspaper.

It is understood that RSA’s brokers JPMorgan and Bank of America Merrill Lynch are also involved, the item said.

Investment bankers at Morgan Stanley are advising Zurich, the report added.

A Sunday Express report cited a source close to RSA who said the board would think about entering negotiations with Zurich if a suitable offer was forthcoming. The RSA board would have to consider an offer pitched at 616p per share, or GBP 6.2bn (EUR 8.82bn), the source added. The source cited deal values involving insurance companies and FTSE-100 companies across the board for the valuation.

Separately, the Sunday Express cited an analyst who said RSA will announce a 236% increase in pre-tax profits to GBP 232m in its interim financial report on Thursday, 6 August. RSA will also declare a 3.3p per share interim dividend, the analyst said.

RSA Insurance Group’s share price closed 3p down at 514p in London on Friday, 31 July, giving the company a market capitalisation of GBP 5.22bn.
Sunday Telegraph, Sunday Express

NY Post : Hillary Clinton’s tax plan would be ‘devastating': critics

Almost doubling short-term capital-gains tax rates — recently proposed by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton — would hurt the economy because investment taxes are already excessive, critics say.
“Her proposal would have a devastating effect on capital formation. She is absolutely out to lunch,” says Arthur Laffer, a Reagan administration supply-side economist.
The Clinton plan calls for the tax rate on short-term capital gains — the sale of properties held for less than two years — from the current average of 28.6 percent to 39.6 percent on high-income earners.
“The mainstream of economists want growth. That means there should be less taxes on investments,” says Mark Bloomfield, president of the American Council for Capital Formation.
“This could create economic stagnation as some people decide to hold on to investments for longer periods,” says Scott Ehrenpreis, a principal with Friedman LLP, heading its tax controversy group.
But Ehrenpreis says the issue is whether the proposal would create jobs, while a market observer says it would create more money for the government.
Greg McBride, a financial analyst with Bankrate.com, says raising investment taxes will generate more revenue for the government but “won’t do much to change investor behavior.” He says investors will adjust and hold on to the securities longer.
The proposal, supporters note, would affect only the top 5 percent of wage-earners — those making about $464,000 a year for married couples and $413,000 for singles.
The Clinton rate would then go on a sliding scale, with the capital gains rate reduced to 24 percent over five years. After six years of holding a property before selling, taxpayers would pay what is today the highest tax — 20 percent.
Clinton lists another reason for higher taxes. In a briefing paper, she says her goal is to end the “tyranny” of the short-term investor. This is someone who frequently buys and sells. This investor speculates at the expense of long-term investing. That, she says, hurts workers who need higher pay.
“Corporate profits are at near-record highs, but they are not showing up in the wages of everyday Americans,” she wrote.
“That’s in part because too many pressures in our economy today are pushing businesses toward short-termism — a focus on the next earnings report or the short-term share price, rather than the sources of long-term growth and lasting value: workers and their skills, R&D and physical capital,” Clinton says.
She complains that today, about 75 percent of capital gains “go to those earning more than $1 million a year.”

(ZeroHedge) We're Not All Gordon Gecko - Dan Loeb Defends 'The Activist' Investo

We're Not All Gordon Gecko - Dan Loeb Defends 'The Activist' Investor

Excerpted from Third Point LLC's letter to investors,

Lately, a varied chorus of powerful union bosses, politicians and candidates, an asset management company executive, and a few ivory tower types have asserted that activism is short term in nature, engaged in by “hit and run” investors who care only about making a quick buck while leaving a company and its employees in ruins.
They assert that activists blackmail their targets to choke off long-term growth initiatives like research and development in favor of financial gimmicks that artificially and temporarily inflate share prices.
It might surprise people to hear that we agree completely that the sort of activism they describe is abominable. Luckily, it does not really exist, and certainly not at Third Point.

Activists today are very different from corporate raiders of the ‘80’s (about whom these criticisms might have been leveled fairly). Our activist investments, which we consider to be those in which we seek to use our minority shareholding to obtain board seats, have been some of our most complex and have been held for well over the one year threshold identified as offensive by the critics. In almost every example – from Ligand to Yahoo to Sotheby’s – our influence has contributed meaningfully to the sustainability and growth of the companies in question. In each of the three investments above, for example, we brought in all-star CEOs and gave them extensive runway to implement ambitious turnaround plans that would take years to come to fruition. A strong CEO with a coherent operating plan can create value for shareholders along the way as their plans are implemented. Our investors have benefitted from our ability to install visionary leaders like John Higgins, Marissa Mayer, and Tad Smith.

Not every politician is a critic. As you may recall, the case we made for good governance, and implicitly activism, in Japan two years ago was later adopted by Prime Minister Abe and his policy makers to successfully encourage economic momentum and wage growth. His approach has been a success, as better corporate governance principles have led companies like Fanuc to adopt more shareholder friendly approaches and led to increased foreign investments in individual Japanese companies and the overall market.

We believe that activism serves an important function not only for our investors, but also for capital markets and society in general. The success of America’s large and robust capital markets – the greatest in the world – rests on a framework based on principles of democracy like freedom of speech, transparency, and rule of law. The reason that companies (with the exception of a few in the tech space) are able to raise capital so smoothly is because investors understand that a governance structure known as a board is in place to hold management accountable, be responsible for management’s fair compensation, and oversee important capital and strategic decisions. The fact that shareholders have the right to vote for or sometimes remove directors is critical to the ecosystem of the capital markets.

We are proud of the returns we have generated from being engaged, constructive, and sometimes “activist” investors, and even more so that our activities have led to more efficient organizations that are better able to compete, grow, and innovate. We hope the critics will educate themselves about how activists contribute to the American economy. Regardless, we believe the environment for constructive engagement with management teams is one of our more exciting areas of opportunity today and look forward to further successes in this strategy.

* * *

Thanks to our long and successful track record, we have a particular advantage in the area of shareholder activism. We are confident that opportunities will continue to exist to bring our owner’s perspective on capital allocation, profitability, and strategy to corporations.We will also continue to serve as an agent of change in extreme cases, when corporate boards are unable to make necessary management changes due to incompetence or unwillingness to take action.