FT : From cars to handbags: can Renault’s Luca de Meo revive Gucci owner Kering?

From cars to handbags: can Renault’s Luca de Meo revive Gucci owner Kering?
Italian transformed motor group but views are split on whether his methods will work in luxury sector

Luca de Meo was among the French business elite celebrating the opening of the 2024 Olympic Games at a party hosted by luxury group LVMH at its five-star Cheval Blanc hotel in Paris last July.

The Renault chief executive joined LVMH patriarch Bernard Arnault and top executives such as Louis Vuitton chief Pietro Beccari. But few expected that within a year the motor industry veteran would end up with the top job at LVMH’s longtime rival: Kering.

The Italian is set to leave Renault next month to become boss of Kering, the struggling owner of Gucci and Saint Laurent, from mid-September.  

While de Meo has spent his entire career in the car industry, he has been making discreet overtures to the luxury industry for some time, according to two people with knowledge of the situation.

He cemented his reputation by leading a turnaround of Renault, which he took over in 2020 when it was still reeling from the departure of Carlos Ghosn the previous year. Ghosn had been ousted following his arrest in Japan on charges he denies, later making a daredevil escape to Lebanon in a musical instrument box.

Since de Meo took over in July 2020 Renault’s share price has almost doubled, while Volkswagen’s has fallen by a third and Stellantis’s has been almost flat. Renault’s operating profit margin improved from a loss in 2020 to a record 7.6 per cent last year.

As he moves from one top French company to another and prepares to steer another corporate turnaround, the question is whether de Meo’s lack of experience selling handbags and high heels will help or hinder his attempt to revive Kering.

“Luxury is a bit different from carmakers” said one luxury executive, who said de Meo was “a big captain of industry and a real star” who could still succeed in his new role.

“Kering isn’t lacking in creativity, but in structure and discipline,” the person said.

A combination of strategic mis-steps and a global slowdown in demand for high-end handbags and watches has left Kering in a difficult position. Flavio Cereda, fund manager and luxury specialist at GAM, said Kering had to “do something big” to address the situation.

Kering’s slowdown follows several years of strong growth. Revenues increased by a third to a peak of €20.4bn between 2018 and 2022, driven by the boom in luxury demand in China and the success of Gucci.

But Gucci, which accounts for about half of group revenues and two-thirds of operating income, has since fallen out of favour with few timeless products to offset industry downturns or changes in fashion trends.

Kering’s second-biggest brand, Saint Laurent, has also been struggling. A €3.5bn deal for niche perfumer Creed is among the acquisitions that have raised questions about Kering’s dealmaking, along with a series of expensive real estate purchases. It is now selling stakes in some of the buildings as it seeks to reduce debts. 

In March, shares dropped 12 per cent in a day as Kering appointed designer Demna Gvasalia as Gucci’s creative head after his predecessor lasted just two years in the role.

While the shares rose 11.8 per cent on Monday after news of de Meo’s appointment, they are still down by more than 60 per cent in the past three years, reducing the Paris-listed group’s market value to €24.1bn. 

Bernstein analyst Luca Solca said de Meo’s top priorities should be reviewing the team and strategy at Gucci, the group’s biggest brand, as well as cutting debt and refocusing investments.

At Renault, de Meo cut costs and improved the product range, including the release of the popular Renault 5, one of its most affordable electric vehicles.

Some question whether his experience with cost-cutting and product engineering will yield the same results in the luxury industry, where sales are often driven by emotion and aspiration as much as quality.

But others point out that a number of top managers have come from outside the sector: Antonio Belloni, former group managing director of LVMH, came from diaper and detergent maker Procter & Gamble, and Louis Vuitton’s Beccari from industrial and consumer products group Henkel. 

People close to Kering say François-Henri Pinault, the scion of Kering’s controlling family who de Meo will replace as chief executive, wants the new hire to deploy his business development and marketing acumen to revive the group’s fortunes. Operating income fell by almost half in 2024.

Pinault, who will remain as chair, a role he previously held alongside his duties as chief executive, said on Monday that de Meo was “not only a great developer . . . but also very operational with a deep understanding of the value chain [in his industry]”.

“He will do that here . . . while bringing his new way of looking at things, which will be very precious,” he added.

People who have worked with de Meo describe him as a street smart, ambitious leader who turned Renault’s relative lack of clout into an asset.

The group’s European focus has left it less exposed to the US tariffs and market share loss in China, while he used partnerships with other providers such as a combustion engine tie-up with Geely to get around Renault’s lack of scale.

For Kering, De Meo was “hardly a ‘plug and play’ appointment but it’s a start, finally”, said GAM’s Cereda. “In the end, it’s still about a product offering that is just not working at this time.”

Known to have a taste for sharp suits and Swiss watches, de Meo’s management style has not always sat well with colleagues, with his ego said to have caused friction at times. “De Meo’s problem is de Meo,” said an executive in the auto industry. 

But one person who has advised de Meo said he was good at spotting his weaknesses and hiring people to either compensate for expertise he lacks, or to “keep him in check”.

People close to the group hope the Milan-born de Meo’s French and Italian cultural ties will help him cultivate rapport between Kering’s French head office and its operations in Italy, where there have been tensions over the direction of the company, according to several people with knowledge of the situation. 

However, he has a long road ahead. “It’s very difficult to turn around a brand like Gucci once you’ve destroyed its image . . . When you lose the consumer like that it takes time to regain them,” said one French banker. 

Another challenge will be to build a strong relationship with Pinault, who has over two decades transformed Kering from a retail and fashion conglomerate into a leading pure luxury player. 

Pinault had been thinking about changes to Kering’s governance, including splitting the chair and CEO roles since 2023, quietly sounding out candidates for chief executive. But it was not until he met with de Meo through recruitment firm Jouve in recent months that he felt he had identified the right person. 

Pinault insisted on Monday that de Meo would be “a full CEO, with all the empowerments I had”.

“I will be fully involved in strategic orientation as chair of the board . . . but I won’t step in and short-circuit the new CEO,” he said, before adding: “I don’t expect a revolution.”

FT : Spotify’s Daniel Ek leads €600mn investment in defence start-up Helsing

Spotify’s Daniel Ek leads €600mn investment in defence start-up Helsing
German drone maker valued at €12bn to become one of Europe’s most valuable tech groups

Spotify founder Daniel Ek is leading a €600mn investment in Helsing, valuing the German defence tech group at €12bn and making it one of Europe’s most valuable start-ups.

The deal comes as the Munich-based start-up is expanding from its origins in artificial intelligence software to produce its own drones, aircraft and submarines.

Helsing is benefiting from a surge of investment in defence groups, as a highly charged geopolitical environment spurs nations all over the world to increase military spending and the war in Ukraine triggers a rethink of battlefield technology.

Prima Materia, the investment company founded by Ek and early Spotify investor Shakil Khan in 2020, made the first significant investment into Helsing in 2021, months before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Now Prima Materia is “doubling down”, Ek told the FT. It is leading the start-up’s latest investment alongside existing backers including Swedish defence group Saab and venture capitalists Lightspeed Ventures, Accel, Plural and General Catalyst.

The deal brings its total capital raised to €1.37bn

“The world is being tested in more ways than ever before. That has sped up the timeline” for Helsing’s financing, Ek said, pointing in particular to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, where drones and other AI-powered systems have been deployed at scale for the first time.

“There’s an enormous realisation that it’s really now AI, mass and autonomy that is driving the new battlefield,” said Ek. “We can’t understate the implications of that for this conflict [in Ukraine] or really any conflict going forward.”

Four-year-old Helsing’s valuation has more than doubled since it raised €450mn less than a year ago. The latest investment, which is made through a combination of traditional equity and other financing, values the company at around €12bn, according to people familiar with the matter.

The figure ranks Helsing among the five most valuable private tech companies in Europe. The company declined to comment on its valuation.

The deal comes after California-based start-up Anduril recently raised $2.5bn at a $30.5bn valuation. European drone makers Quantum Systems and Tekever were both valued at more than €1bn last month.

Helsing has sold thousands of strike drones, produced in its own facility in southern Germany, to Ukraine. It has also secured contracts the UK, Germany and Sweden.

The company recently completed successful test flights of its autonomous air combat system, which piloted a Saab fighter jet, and unveiled plans for a fleet of unmanned surveillance submarines.

“We’re now at an inflection point . . . where we are going from a software company to an all-domain, AI software and hardware company,” said Ek, who also chairs Helsing.

Helsing was founded in 2021 by Torsten Reil, a video games entrepreneur, Gundbert Scherf, a former German defence ministry official, and Niklas Köhler, an AI researcher. The trio has vowed not to sell the company and instead plans to go public in the future.

Helsing has struck partnerships with Saab to incorporate its AI software into the Swedish defence group’s systems, as well as with Paris-based Mistral to build out its platform’s decision-making capabilities. However, a partnership with German military giant Rheinmetall, announced in 2022, fizzled last year.

Ek’s initial investment into Helsing triggered a backlash against Spotify, the digital music service he co-founded in 2006 and still runs as chief executive. But he said he was not worried about the potential threat of another boycott.

“I’m sure people will criticise it and that’s OK,” Ek said. “Personally, I’m not concerned about it. I focus more on doing what I think is right and I am 100 per cent convinced that this is the right thing for Europe.”

>>> US After Hours Summary: Solar stocks under pressure on Reuters report that S

After Hours Summary: Solar stocks under pressure on Reuters report that Senate GOP seeks to end credits, RUN -27.5%, SEDG -23%, ENPH -15.5%, FSLR -10%; MMYT -10.8% on offering and deal to buy shares from TCOM

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: APPS +10.6%, LEN +3.5%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: BLND +1.7% (BLND and ONIT expand partnership), MUSA +0.9% (operations update), FITB +0.6% (authorizes new 100 mln share repurchase program), CNC +0.5% (Senate Republicans issue Medicare/Medicaid proposals), RKLB +0.3% (adds two new missions), HUM +0.2% (Senate Republicans issue Medicare/Medicaid proposals), BA +0.1% (US clears potential $2bln sale of fighter jet parts to Australia, according to Reuters), ANET +0.1% (names former FSLY CEO as its new COO), HIPO +0.1% (to repurchase $14.5 mln in shares from Lennar)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: None

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: RUN -27.5% (Senate tax committee proposes full phase-out of solar and wind energy tax credits, according to Reuters), SEDG -23% (Senate tax committee proposes full phase-out of solar and wind energy tax credits, according to Reuters), ENPH -15.5% (Senate tax committee proposes full phase-out of solar and wind energy tax credits, according to Reuters), MMYT -10.8% (files for ordinary share offering; to repurchase MMYT shares from TCOM), FSLR -10% (Senate tax committee proposes full phase-out of solar and wind energy tax credits, according to Reuters), RDW -9.5% (commences $200 mln common stock offering), TCOM -5.4% (to sell MMYT shares to MMYT), CTRI -4.6% (SWX commences 9.5 mln share offering of CTRI common stock), BLDP -2.8% (CEO to step down, names new CEO), TPC -0.9% (awarded $34 mln project), CVS -0.7% (Senate Republicans issue Medicare/Medicaid proposals), ONIT -0.4% (BLND and ONIT expand partnership), KKR -0.3% (to acquire Zenith Energy), AMBC -0.1% (provides timing update on sale of its legacy financial guarantee business), MKL -0.1% (announces new leadership appts as part of a strategic regional realignment), MSFT -0.1% (tensions with OpenAI reach boiling point, according to WSJ), CSTL -0.1% (collaboration and license agreement with SciBase), UNH -0.1% (Senate Republicans issue Medicare/Medicaid proposals)

>>> US Close Dow +0.75% S&P +0.94% Nasdaq +1.52% Russell +1.12%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The stock market regrouped today and reclaimed a portion of the losses it suffered Friday, comforted somewhat by an understanding that the Israel-Iran conflict remains relatively contained and has not led to any major disruption in oil supply lines.

In a related development, press reports suggested today that Iran is working diplomatic channels to try to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Israel, although Israel has not expressed similar overtures.

The latter point notwithstanding, the stock market was imbued with a positive bias that was the strongest at today's open, which carried the S&P 500 as high as 6,050. Buyers, though, didn't maintain that early conviction. The major indices trended lower from those opening highs in a gradual manner over the remainder of the session but still ended the day comfortably above the unchanged line.

The gains were fortified by the outperformance of the mega-cap stocks, which registered in the leadership of the information technology (+1.5%), communication services (+1.5%), and consumer discretionary (+1.2%) sectors. The Vanguard Mega-Cap Growth ETF (MGK) was up 1.3% versus a 0.9% gain for the S&P 500.

Separately, the semiconductor stocks were the standout performers, particularly Advanced Micro Devices (AMD 126.40, +10.24, +8.82%), which rallied on a CNBC report that the company might have secured a GPU deal with Amazon (AMZN 216.17, +4.07, +1.92%). The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index surged 3.0%, leaving it up 23.3% for the quarter.

On the flip side, defense stocks and energy shares retreated from Friday's leadership positions as the market's angst about the Israel-Iran conflict eased.

The S&P 500 energy sector (-0.3%) traded lower in conjunction with WTI crude futures (71.83, -1.33, -1.8%). Relative weakness was also seen in the more defensive-oriented utilities (-0.5%), health care (-0.4%), and consumer staples (+0.02%) sectors.

Breadth figures favored advancers over decliners by a less than 2-to-1 margin at the NYSE and Nasdaq, with a narrowing in that edge as the session progressed.
  • S&P 500: +2.6% YTD
  • Nasdaq: +2.0% YTD
  • DJIA: -0.1% YTD
  • S&P 400: -2.7% YTD
  • Russell 2000: -4.8% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:
  • The Empire State Manufacturing Survey for June was weaker than expected at -16.0 (consensus -6.6; prior -9.2), with the indexes for new orders and shipments both declining. This was the fourth consecutive decline in manufacturing activity in New York State; however, firms turned positive about conditions for the next six months.

WWD : New Kering CEO Luca de Meo Seen Bringing a ‘Fresh Vision’ to Luxury Group

New Kering CEO Luca de Meo Seen Bringing a ‘Fresh Vision’ to Luxury Group
Francois-Henri Pinault, who has held the CEO title since 2005, is to remain chairman of the family-controlled luxury group. De Meo is expected to start on Sept. 15.

As the new chief executive officer of Kering effective Sept. 15, Renault executive Luca de Meo is expected to bring a fresh vision to a luxury sector facing myriad headwinds and “structural changes.”

“He will bring new ways of looking at things,” Francois-Henri Pinault said of his successor during a conference call Monday evening to elaborate on the changing of the guard.

Pinault, who has held the CEO title since 2005 and navigated the family-controlled conglomerate through multiple transformations, traversing both buoyant and challenging periods, is to maintain the chairman role.

“I will be fully involved in the strategic orientation of the group as chairman… but I will not step in and short-circuit the CEO in his prerogatives regarding the priorities, the organization or the key appointments of the group,” Pinault said.

That leaves de Meo to orchestrate a turnaround at the troubled luxury giant, dragged down by a steep slowdown at cash-cow brand Gucci, and worrisome wobbles at Saint Laurent and McQueen.

Pinault said the “fit and chemistry between us was obvious within one or two minutes,” lauding de Meo as a “developer” who “brings a global perspective on markets and growth” as well as an “affinity with the product side” and a knack for “revitalizing brands.”

Exane BNP Paribas analyst Antoine Belge asked if Kering would maintain the current management structure, forged in 2023 when Pinault promoted Saint Laurent CEO Francesca Bellettini to deputy CEO in charge of brand development, and chief financial officer Jean-Marc Duplaix to deputy CEO and chief operating officer.

Pinault allowed that de Meo, who spent his whole career in automotive firms, does not know the luxury fashion industry “so he will need strong support and strong expertise around him, and we have that inside the group, starting with Jean-Marc and Francesca.”

However, as a “fully-fledged CEO,” de Meo “will have to set his own priorities, to look at the organization of the group, to look at the key position of the group.”

That said, “we are not slowing down all the action plans defined for 2025,” Pinault added. These include the strategic repositioning of the brands, debt management, and the refinancing of real-estate assets.

In a statement, de Meo said he was “approaching this new professional challenge with enthusiasm, eagerness, and confidence, inspired by the strength of the group’s brands and the expertise of its people. I am convinced that together we will continue to make Kering an essential player in the luxury industry.”

Shares in Kering surged 11.8 percent on Monday on the expectation of management succession, with several equity analysts giving a thumbs up.

“Kering needs change, as performance has continued to deteriorate,” Bernstein’s Luca Solca said in a research note, highlighting that the French company’s share price has fallen 28 percent in 2025 year-to-date and 78 percent from its peak in mid-2021, “largely driven by shrinking sales at its main brand, Gucci, which has been undergoing a multi-year metamorphosis.”

Citi’s Thomas Chauvet trumpeted de Meo’s credentials.

“De Meo is perceived to have largely contributed to Renault’s turnaround through product newness, technological innovation, (electric vehicle) transition shift, brand elevation, and a return to growth and profit,” Chauvet wrote, while cautioning that “execution of luxury brand turnarounds has become more complex, lengthy, costly and far less public-market-friendly in the past few years.”

He explained that this reflects “consumer preference for top brands rather than those in transition and significant P&L disruption from greater investment commitment and lower cost flexibility.”

“There is still a considerable amount of work ahead at Gucci and Saint Laurent (~80 percent of group EBIT combined, pre-central costs) to rejuvenate both brands and generate a steady stream of revenue and cash flow for the group,” wrote Chauvet.

Kering posted a 14 percent decline in first-quarter revenues, with Gucci down 25 percent, Saint Laurent 9 percent and “other houses,” which includes Balenciaga, McQueen, Pomellato and Brioni, off 11 percent.

Solca argued that brand management and marketing are de Meo’s forte, “which dovetails with what the luxury industry does – for which he seems passionate.”

“We were well aware of his affinity for the luxury space, in particular his passion for complicated Swiss watches that we discussed with him at the end of a Renault event in March 2022,” Solca noted. “It is not hard to imagine how intriguing he found the Kering opportunity.”

In a second report issued after the conference call, Solca argued that de Meo “could enact significant change. Key priorities on our list would include resolving the inherent tension in the deputy co-CEO roles, strengthening the leadership team at Gucci, and restructuring or streamlining group and brand-level capex commitments.”

Renault Group revealed Sunday that de Meo had decided to “step down and pursue new challenges outside the automotive sector,” with his departure date set for July 15. Shares in Renault fell 8.7 percent Monday on the news.

The Italian executive has spent five years leading Renault and boasts 30 years in the industry at brands including Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Toyota, Volkswagen and Seat.

Kering has recruited industry outsiders in the past to run its fashion business. What was then Gucci Group famously recruited Robert Polet from Unilever’s ice cream and frozen foods division as its president and CEO from 2004 to 2011.

Still, it marks a significant change for Pinault to take a step back after 20 years and hand the CEO reins back to a non-family member.

In 2005, Pinault had succeeded Serge Weinberg at what was then PPR, a retail conglomerate that was still relatively new in the luxury space.

Pinault was previously president of Fnac — PPR’s music, book and home electronics chain — and had orchestrated the acquisition of the Surcouf electronics chain in the late-Nineties.

When he assumed the management helm of the group he accepted that PPR faced skepticism in the industry for its lack of experience in the luxury realm.

At the time, he said the solution was “to have the best professionals in charge of those businesses: the right teams at the right level. It’s much more a state of mind. You have to be surrounded by very good professionals. If we had taken the decisions without the luxury professionals we have in the group, that would have been dangerous.”

Pinault certainly had an eventful tenure, transforming the family-controlled group by spinning off its retail chains and changing its name to Kering in 2013. It was the parent of a fleet of international brands specializing in fashion and accessories across the luxury and sport-lifestyle segments, the divisions built around Gucci and Puma, respectively.

Originally an acronym for Pinault-Printemps-Redoute, PPR began edging out of retail in 2006 when it sold the Printemps department store chain, following up with a listing for African trading company CFAO in 2009 and a sale of the Conforama furniture chain to Steinhoff International in 2010.

In that vein, Kering would end up exiting the sport-lifestyle business, selling off its stakes in Puma, Electric and Volcom to become a pure luxury player in 2019.

Pinault enjoyed many big years in his tenure, perhaps none bigger than 2023.

That was the year he took beauty in-house; acquired Creed; invested in Valentino and forged a strategic alliance with Qatari investment group Mayhoola; recruited new designers for Gucci and McQueen; parted ways with longtime Gucci executive Marco Bizzarri, and entrusted Saint Laurent president and CEO Francesca Bellettini with overseeing all the brands in the French group’s portfolio.

More recently, the executive has been rueful, telling shareholders at the company’s annual meeting last April that he was unhappy with Kering’s results and share price performance. “I am totally committed to making sure the stock price recovers by restoring financial performance, not in the very short term, but in a sustainable manner in order to generate a stock price that is less volatile and more solid in the months and years to come,” he said.

Kering is banking on its star Balenciaga designer Demna to speed the turnaround at Gucci, where he starts as creative director next month, with his first designs to be unveiled during Milan Fashion Week in September.

Demna’s successor Pierpaolo Piccioli is to show his first Balenciaga designs in September. Louise Trotter is also to make her debut this fall at Bottega Veneta, which logged a 4 percent uptick in the first quarter.ew

The Information : DoorDash and Uber’s Behind-the-Scenes Delivery Battles

DoorDash and Uber’s Behind-the-Scenes Delivery Battles

The Takeaway
• DoorDash held talks with Trendyol before Uber announced deal
• Uber and DoorDash vie over table-booking services as new growth area
• DoorDash, Uber and Prosus face tough market share battles in U.K., Italy, France

A recent delivery dealmaking frenzy in Europe has kicked off a race between DoorDash, Uber and investment firm Prosus, as the three firms aim to grab more business in the already fiercely competitive market.

Some of that has been playing out publicly, with a series of rapid-fire announcements. But behind the scenes, U.S. delivery archrivals DoorDash and Uber have also been fighting over some of the same deals. DoorDash made overtures to Trendyol Go, a Turkish delivery service Uber wound up agreeing to buy most of, people familiar with the matter said, while the rivals also competed on expanding into restaurant reservations.

DoorDash has long been battling Uber to defend its position as the dominant food-delivery service in the U.S., where it has more than 60% of the market. But the two firms’ rivalry is also intensifying overseas, most visibly with DoorDash’s recent $4 billion deal to buy U.K.-based Deliveroo. The acquisition gives DoorDash a foothold in several big countries where Uber Eats is beating it, including France and Germany.

Europe has long been a tantalizing but tough delivery market—it’s big but mostly slow-growing, with consumer adoption of food delivery lagging U.S. trends. Homegrown European food-delivery firms have stagnated in recent years, and some have shuttered or sold particularly poor-performing segments, setting in motion a changing of the guard in ownership.

At the same time, DoorDash and Uber, whose Uber Eats is the No. 2 delivery service in the U.S., are looking to wring more revenue from restaurants and delivery customers in the U.S. and other big existing markets. That’s prompted both to seek ways to link up table-booking and delivery services.

Recent months saw a head-spinning series of announcements on both fronts. In February, investment firm Prosus said it would acquire Amsterdam-based Deliveroo competitor Just Eat Takeaway.com for roughly $4.3 billion cash, making Prosus the biggest delivery group outside the U.S. and China. Just Eat has been trying to stem its losses and focus on profitability in recent years—it sold off its U.S. Grubhub business to food startup Wonder in November.

Then in early May, DoorDash announced its planned all-cash Deliveroo acquisition, along with a deal to buy OpenTable competitor SevenRooms for $1.2 billion. That same day, Uber said it was acquiring a majority stake in Turkish delivery service Trendyol Go for $700 million in cash.

“Now, it looks like Just Eat is going to get some fresh capital behind it. Uber Eats is now trying to continue to grow share there. It’s kind of now or never” for DoorDash to expand in Europe, said Michael Morton, an analyst at MoffettNathanson.

Leading up to those announcements, DoorDash and Uber went head-to-head on deals and partnerships. Trendyol was close to finalizing a deal to sell most of the delivery business to Uber when DoorDash approached Trendyol in recent months about a potential deal, a person familiar with the negotiations said.

Ultimately Uber prevailed. Trendyol Go represents a small addition for Uber, with $2 billion in gross bookings in 2024, less than 5% of Uber’s nearly $43 billion in overall ride-hailing and delivery volumes. However, Trendyol is fast-growing, with bookings surging 50% year on year in 2024.

DoorDash taking the plunge on Deliveroo, which it reportedly explored buying last year before balking on price, also explains the timing of its SevenRooms acquisition. That deal could add higher-margin software revenue and further lock restaurants into working with DoorDash, which could help it defend its U.S. business while it pursues European expansion.

SevenRooms sells booking and management software to high-end venues like Mandarin Oriental hotels and Wolfgang Puck restaurants. DoorDash will combine that software with its delivery-management software, a person who worked on the strategy said. DoorDash is also weighing the addition of table booking to its main consumer delivery app, the person said. The two companies had previously teamed up on a pilot in 2022 of similar reservation features.

Since then DoorDash had approached OpenTable, a bigger competitor to SevenRooms, about a commercial partnership. And Uber also started discussions with OpenTable earlier this year, a person with direct knowledge of the talks said.

By March, Uber announced that it was teaming up with OpenTable to pair their services in countries including the U.S., Canada and the U.K. And in May, days after the DoorDash-SevenRooms announcement, OpenTable and Uber unveiled more details about their partnership, including adding OpenTable reservations to Uber Eats’ app and discounts on Uber rides to OpenTable-booked meals.

“OpenTable evaluates hundreds of partners a year. With Uber, there was an immediate rapport and mutual vision when the teams met to discuss a collaboration. We admire their partnership philosophy and Uber’s focus on winning the right way,” an OpenTable spokesperson said in a statement.

Prosus, DoorDash and Uber didn’t provide statements.

Fresh Firepower

DoorDash, for its part, has indicated it’s prepared to spend heavily for Deliveroo to win share, since its overall U.S.-dominated business is profitable. That’s a change from how Deliveroo has operated recently.

Deliveroo turned a profit in 2024 after operating at a loss for most of its history, generating positive free cash flow. But its gross order volume grew 6% to roughly $10 billion, a slowdown from recent years and below its overall order growth rate.

DoorDash expanded outside the U.S. in 2022, with a roughly $8 billion acquisition of Finland-founded Wolt, which focuses on smaller Eastern European countries. It has nearly quadrupled European order volume to around $11.5 billion since, but it loses money there on an adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization basis, according to MoffettNathanson estimates.

Prosus, the biggest shareholder in Tencent, has cash on hand from selling some of its stake in the Chinese tech giant. Its Just Eat Takeaway deal is its first outright acquisition in Europe, where Prosus has a minority stake in Berlin-based Delivery Hero.

Just Eat is bigger than Deliveroo in Europe, with over $21 billion in order volumes in 2024, but grew orders just 1% year over year. Prosus plans to restart growth by spending on technology and improved customer service.

Uber, like DoorDash, is operating profitably overall but hasn’t made a big delivery acquisition in Europe previously. Instead, it’s used its ride-hailing business, which operates in 28 European countries, as a launchpad for delivery. Uber hasn’t disclosed whether its European operations are profitable.

The Trendyol deal offered Uber a quick way into a newer, fast-growing market for delivery, a person who worked on the strategy said. Uber also has faced challenges in its ride-hailing business in Turkey, where regulators banned it between 2019 and 2021.

Tough Battles Ahead

All three contenders now face a tough and likely expensive battle growing or defending delivery businesses across Europe.

Food-delivery companies need to attract customers, restaurants and drivers in each city or market—spending on brand building, driver incentives and customer discounts—while also complying with local worker regulations and EU competition laws.

“There’s not a lot of synergies in the traditional sense for buying cross-border food-delivery assets, where there’s no branding synergies,” said Morton, the MoffetNathanson analyst. “The person in the East Village doesn’t care about your restaurant inventory in London.”

At the same time, fresh firepower behind Just Eat and Deliveroo will inflame longstanding country rivalries. In the U.K., for instance, there’s already a tight three-way battle between Just Eat, Uber Eats and Deliveroo, with each taking roughly a third of market share, according to YipitData.

In Italy, meanwhile, Deliveroo has roughly 40% share, just ahead of Delivery Hero–owned Glovo. And in France, Uber Eats has roughly 65% market share, YipitData shows, and Deliveroo has roughly 35%.

Analysts say delivery consolidation in Europe is likely done for now. Still, they haven’t ruled out Chinese firm Meituan, which operates the world’s largest food-delivery business and could be tempted to break into Europe.

Meituan launched food deliveries outside mainland China in 2023 with its own service, Keeta. That service started with Hong Kong, where it underpriced firms including Deliveroo, which wound up exiting that market earlier this year. Meituan expanded to Saudi Arabia and plans to add Brazil later this year, but it hasn’t said anything about Europe yet.

FT : Hedge fund Millennium valued at $14bn in minority stake sale talks

Hedge fund Millennium valued at $14bn in minority stake sale talks
Izzy Englander’s group working with Petershill Partners as it opens up to external investors for the first time

Millennium Management, one of the world’s largest hedge funds, is in talks about selling a minority stake to external investors at a $14bn valuation, as it presses ahead with plans to open up its ownership for the first time.

People familiar with the discussions said that Millennium was working with Goldman Sachs’ Petershill Partners to identify potential buyers for a 10-15 per cent equity stake in Millennium’s management company. It is the first time a formal valuation has been put on the hedge fund.

Petershill, which is operated by Goldman, buys minority stakes in alternative investment firms and is targeting both its own clients and the largest investors in Millennium’s fund with the deal.

The deal would secure Millennium one of the top valuations of any hedge fund manager, according to two people familiar with the situation.

Millennium and Petershill declined to comment.

New York-based Millennium, which has more than $75bn in assets under management, is one of a select group of hedge fund giants that operates across asset classes.

The so-called multi-manager has more than 320 investment teams investing within a tight risk framework, and competes with the likes of Ken Griffin’s Citadel and Steve Cohen’s Point72.

The discussions with external investors come as Millennium is working on a plan to open up the ownership of the management company to its top executives for the first time by distributing equity to its key people.

Millennium is also talking to BlackRock about a strategic partnership that could lead to the world’s largest asset manager taking a small equity stake.

In recent years its septuagenarian founder Izzy Englander, who has kept sole ownership of Millennium for its 36-year history, has taken several steps to institutionalise the business and prepare it for life without him. 

Millennium has secured its capital base by moving the vast majority of investors into a long-term share class, increasing the time it takes them to exit their investment with the hedge fund from one year to five.

Englander has also built out Millennium’s leadership team with a series of senior hires from Goldman Sachs, explored diversifying the business with new strategies, and changed its fee structure so that investors are now required to pay a minimum fee regardless of the fund’s performance.

Annual fees, on top of expenses, are now about 1 per cent of assets or 20 per cent of investment gains, something bankers described as akin to a management fee. 

Hedge funds are typically valued on the basis of their management fees — around 1-2 per cent of overall assets — and the performance fees they generate. Management fees are seen as more predictable revenues and are ascribed a higher valuation by the market than sometimes volatile performance fees. 

An adviser to private capital groups said that multi-manager hedge funds — even those such as Millennium with capital that has been locked up for a few years — typically receive a lower multiple on their management fees than the multiple for the management fees of private equity firms. They also usually have lower performance fees. 

“If you put it all together it is a significantly lower multiple business than a well established private equity firm,” they said. “But investors could still be enamoured with the brand.”

The adviser said that “the publicly listed private equity firms trade for mid teens to low 20s multiple of cash flow. A hedge fund will be significantly less than that.” 

Millennium’s flagship fund gained 15.1 per cent last year and is up about 0.4 per cent this year through May, investors said. It has recorded annualised gains of about 14 per cent since inception.

WSJ : Gucci Owner Picks Auto Executive for One of Global Luxury’s Top Jobs

Gucci Owner Picks Auto Executive for One of Global Luxury’s Top Jobs
Renault’s Luca de Meo faces a ‘titanic challenge’ at Kering, analyst says

Key Points
  • Kering is set to name Luca de Meo, Renault’s CEO, as chief executive, replacing Francois-Henri Pinault, people familiar with the matter said.
  • De Meo refocused Renault, slimming its model range and boosting profitability in electric vehicles.
  • Kering’s shares, which have fallen steeply from a peak earlier this decade, rallied on the likely appointment.

PARIS—François-Henri Pinault, the billionaire heir who spent two decades transforming Kering KER 11.76%increase; green up pointing triangle into a luxury powerhouse, is stepping back as chief executive officer, hoping an auto-industry veteran can pull Gucci and Saint Laurent out of a slump.

Kering on Monday named departing Renault chief Luca de Meo as CEO, ending months of speculation about a possible leadership change at the French fashion group, which also owns Bottega Veneta, Balenciaga and Alexander McQueen.

Pinault, who took charge in 2005 from his father, oversaw Kering’s shift from a sprawling retail conglomerate to a focused luxury player. The move paid off handsomely during the boom years, but it has since run into trouble.

Now, Pinault said, Kering was “ready for a new stage in its development.” He praised de Meo’s “experience at the helm of an international listed group, his sharp understanding of brands, and his sense of a strong and respectful corporate culture.”

De Meo will take the helm on Sept. 15, subject to shareholder approval, Kering said. His last day at Renault RNO -8.69%decrease; red down pointing triangle will be July 15. Pinault will remain chairman.

For Kering, the move represents a gamble at a precarious moment. Once a leader in European luxury, the group now lags behind rivals such as Hermès and Bernard Arnault’s LVMH by a widening margin.

Gucci, Kering’s biggest brand by revenue, has stumbled in China and lost ground to many competitors. Saint Laurent has also struggled, weighed down by a smaller wholesale business and a tougher U.S. market. Kering’s market value has dropped about 70% from a high three years ago.

“De Meo has a titanic challenge ahead of him,” said Luca Solca, analyst at Bernstein. “Investors will need to hear what it is that de Meo plans to do and digest how soon his plans can be realized.”

Kering investors welcomed the news. Kering shares rose 12% in Paris on Monday, after reports of the likely appointment emerged, while Renault stock fell 8%.

Pinault, who met de Meo a few months ago, told analysts he had been laying the groundwork to split the roles of chairman and CEO for a number of years, a process that accelerated in recent months. He brought in two headhunters to help identify a successor.

In addition to retaining the chairman’s role, Pinault and his family hold a 42% shareholding and about 60% of the company’s voting rights. The holding accounts for the bulk of the family’s fortune, estimated at just under $20 billion.

With the 58-year-old de Meo, Kering is betting that an executive who revitalized car marques can do the same for handbags and ready-to-wear clothes.

De Meo has more than three decades of experience in the automotive industry, building a strong reputation as a brand builder and marketer. He helped turn Fiat’s modern 500 into a cultural icon, carved out Seat’s sporty Cupra line, and refocused Renault by slimming its model range and boosting profitability in hybrids and electric vehicles.

De Meo is also no stranger to craftsmanship: He collects intricate Swiss watches and counts Pietro Beccari, CEO of LVMH’s Louis Vuitton brand, as a close friend—a bond cemented over regular padel matches.

Still, running a carmaker and leading a luxury conglomerate demand different skills. Success in autos relies heavily on industrial scale, efficiency and engineering excellence. High fashion, by contrast, depends more on narrative, cultural cachet and the unpredictable chemistry between designers and audiences. A luxury leader must be able to manage a stable of creative directors, handle viral social-media moments and safeguard brand mystique.

Reviving underperforming brands has become more complex and costly, with investors wary of turnaround stories and consumers gravitating toward established leaders, said Thomas Chauvet, luxury analyst at Citi. He said Kering faces a long road to restore momentum at Gucci and Saint Laurent and secure steady growth and cash flow.

Pinault has been candid about the need for bold action and has shaken up Kering over the past two years. He named two deputy CEOs and became more involved in so-called brand-elevation strategies, which aim to ensure that every action taken builds the brand’s long-term standing, in areas from real estate to marketing and product development.

At Gucci, which made up almost half of sales and more than 60% of core profit last year, a new CEO took over in the fall. A new creative director, Demna Gvasalia of Balenciaga, is due to take over the creative reins in July.

FT Lex : Gucci owner Kering’s new CEO is a surprisingly good fit

Gucci owner Kering’s new CEO is a surprisingly good fit
It would not hurt the luxury group to have a more traditional approach to governance

What does a mass-market carmaker have in common with a luxury goods provider? Investors may well be pondering that question as they digest news that Luca de Meo, lifetime car executive and architect of Renault’s nifty turnaround, has quit to lead Gucci parent company Kering. 

In theory, there is little overlap between the two jobs. True, at the very top of the heap, businesses selling super-premium cars and buttery-soft handbags do seem to have converged — as evidenced by the high margins and high valuations of Ferrari and Hermès. 

But the distance between Renault and Kering is much greater. While Renault has brushed up its product offering, the French carmaker’s turnaround was, in essence, about cost and capacity cuts. Luxury, meanwhile, is about growing sales — something that Kering’s ailing Gucci brand is failing to do. 


Dig a little deeper, and de Meo’s appointment makes more sense. For one thing, while luxury’s equity story is not centred on efficiency, a little discipline never goes amiss. Kering could probably do with some. UBS forecasts that Gucci sales this year will be about 30 per cent lower than in 2018, while its store count at the end of last year was about 13 per cent higher. Financially, too, Kering is more thinly stretched than its peers, with 2024 net debt of more than twice its ebitda, and has embarked on a programme to offload stakes in its real estate portfolio.

Nor would it hurt Kering to have a more traditional approach to governance. Major shareholder François-Henri Pinault occupies the chair and chief executive seats, with two deputy CEOs reporting to him. Such structures are perhaps palatable when companies do well, but become less so when their sales are sinking. The appointment of a new, experienced chief executive will help allay concerns. 

Even in the rarefied world of luxury, bosses need an eye for high-end talent as well as high-end fashion. Perhaps in recognition of this, the sector has started to appoint more outsiders. Chanel picked Leena Nair from Unilever for the top job in 2021, while Audemars Piguet plumped for Ilaria Resta, whose career had been built on consumer goods and fragrance, in 2023. Ferrari has performed strongly since the 2021 appointment of Benedetto Vigna, an electric components expert from STMicroelectronics with no prior luxury experience. 

All this suggests that, while making cars is different to making couture, running a company is a transferable skill — which helps explain why Renault hit the skids on Monday morning, while Kering gained almost 12 per cent to about €24bn.


As de Meo goes one way, other executives might yet go the other. Mass-market car manufacturing is becoming commoditised; design will become an increasingly important competitive differentiator. The ascent of Tesla in part shows this is already the case. If the auto industry seeks new executive talent, the world of luxury may not be a bad place to look.

FT Lex : European bank M&A is hard, but sometimes stars align

European bank M&A is hard, but sometimes stars align
Some of the continent’s biggest potential combinations remain, to varying degrees, stuck

Attempts to merge European banks are becoming more common. Most recent deals, though, will require a major stakeholder to be dragged kicking and screaming — be it the target, a national government, or both — if they are to close. BPCE’s €6.4bn acquisition of Portuguese lender Novo Banco is that rare case: a bank tie-up that pleases almost everyone. 

French lender BPCE says buying Novo Banco from its private equity owner Lone Star is part of the broader project of “European banking consolidation” necessary for boosting the continent’s economic growth. It is true that the continent could use the efficiencies, both for customers and shareholders, that come with having more big banks. But for that to happen, many interests must coalesce.

In this case, they have. BPCE, which owns Natixis and a pair of French retail banking businesses, is getting extra scale and geographic diversification at a relatively low price. The price of 1.3 times Novo Banco’s net assets looks high, but then the lender, formed from the remnants of failed Banco Espírito Santo in 2014, is unusually profitable by Eurozone standards. Valued as a multiple of earnings, the price is in line with the sector, even factoring in the premium.


For Lone Star, meanwhile, the deal crystallises an extremely profitable investment in one swoop. It could probably have ultimately earned more through an initial public offering, but the stake was already eight years old, a long time for private equity investors. And Lone Star looks to be making almost six times its initial €1bn investment from the sale of its 75 per cent stake plus previous dividends.

Portugal’s government, which was a minority shareholder, may have preferred a listing too, in an ideal world, but the more likely alternative to BPCE’s bid would have been a takeover by Spain’s CaixaBank. Since Portugal already relies heavily on Spanish banks, a source of some political consternation, a French owner looks like the lesser of two evils. 

It will be tricky to get the stars to align in the same way for further cross-border bank deals, however strong their logic. European governments, encouraged by high-profile figures like former central bank chief Mario Draghi, support European banking champions in theory, but nationalistic interests often get in the way in practice. 

Some of Europe’s biggest potential combinations remain, to varying degrees, stuck. Look at the resistance to UniCredit’s stakebuilding in Commerzbank, or the drama created even by domestic deals like BBVA’s attempt to buy Sabadell. Those deals still face political obstacles. But if bets like BPCE’s pay off, opposition will look increasingly counter-productive.