>>> Updated Tesla Model S with more features, higher price coming soon


Updated Tesla Model S with more features, higher price coming soon
Tesla's Model S sedan changed the world's perceptions on what an electric car could be. Four years later, it's finally getting some much-needed updates -- and a price hike.

When the Tesla Model S hit the roads way back in 2012, it convinced a lot of people that a battery-powered car could be genuinely good to drive and not just good for the environment. Now, that car is about to get a refresh that could be unveiled as early as next week.

According to sources inside the company, Tesla will be making a series of updates to the Model S with the goals of both simplifying manufacturing and adding some more luxury-minded appointments. That latter part is important as the Model S will soon face what could be its strongest competition yet: Tesla's own Model 3. These updates will also help boost its standing against increasingly attractive (though non-EV) options from BMW, Audi and Mercedes-Benz, cars that generally offer far more refined interiors.

The most immediate change, according to our sources, will be a slight visual refresh on the nose. It won't look exactly like the Model X or Model 3, we're told, but it will bring the car closer to the frontal treatments of those cars. LED headlights will also provide a cleaner look up front, while some additional paint colors will join the configurator.

On the inside, the Model S will move to the same front seats found in the Model X, meaning ventilation will be an option. The car will receive some new interior storage compartments, including pockets in the door -- an addition current owners will appreciate.

We're told that Tesla is cleaning out the last of the previous generation's production parts now and that the refreshed Model S could debut as early as next week. Our sources say a price increase will come with these updates, but the amount remains to be seen.

When asked about the upcoming Model S refresh, a Tesla spokesperson provided the following statement:

We don't comment on rumor or speculation about future releases. Tesla is constantly innovating and adding new features to our vehicles to perpetually improve Tesla vehicles for our existing and future customers. We price our vehicles consistently throughout the world which requires us to adjust pricing to foreign currency exchange rates. We have let customers know that some price changes will take effect in early April. We always encourage those interested in purchasing Model S to place their order so they can start enjoying the many benefits of Model S today.

Needless to say, we'll bring you more updates on the Model S refresh as we get them.

>>> Barrons weekend update: positive on TOL, STX, AAPL

Barrons weekend update: positive on TOL, STX, AAPL 

Cover story: Pimco co-founder Bill Gross, who now runs JUCAX at Janus Capital, "doesn't think much of the central-bank policies that have repressed rates, punished savers, and failed to ignite economic growth, and says the Fed must begin to raise rates in coming years to keep the economy on track." 

Features: 1) Positive on TOL: Homebuilder's expansion into the luxury condominium sector in cities such as New York during recent years has paid off, but recent concern on Wall Street is overdone, and shares could offer 40% upside; 2) Positive on STX: Shares of hard-drive maker are down by 38% during the past 12 months, but the growth of cloud storage should create greater demand, the dividend looks safe, and the stock could return 20%; 3) Positive on AAPL: Slow growth, primarily tied to the iPhone, has sent shares down, but at $108 they're undervalued and could hit $150 in a year for a return of 40% because of strong recurring revenue from the company's growing services business.

Tech Trader: Cautious on MU: Things aren't likely to improve anytime soon for maker of DRAM chips, with Samsung boosting production even as prices fall, much like the Saudis have done with oil; Micron won't decrease production as it moves to a new manufacturing technology that should bring down costs and help profits. 

Trader: "Macroeconomic factors have influenced the market over the past few weeks," says David Lefkowitz of UBS Wealth Management Americas, "but when Q1 earnings start flowing this week, there will be more stock-specific activity"; Cautious on WWE: Company is profitable, has little debt, and a 3% dividend, but it isn't growing as fast as many investors believe, and shares have a high valuation; Cautious on BHI: It's remains uncertain whether the merger with HAL will proceed, even though both companies say they will "vigorously content" the Justice Department antitrust suit seeking to halt it. 

Mutual Fund Quarterly: Story says investors should avoid "smart beta" exchange traded funds, because their strategies have grown more expensive and risk crashing if they return to historical valuations; Profile of Primecap Management, a $100B firm with six mutual funds that have beat at least 86% of their peers during the past decade; A look at how to choose the best dividend ETFs, which offer a variety of yields and returns; "In a quarter that saw one of the biggest market reversals in the history of the S&P 500, actively managed mutual funds failed to keep up with the index. Value, commodity, and emerging-markets funds did best." 

Small Caps: Positive on OI: Shares of the world's largest maker of glass bottles are down 50% from a June 2014 high, making them attractive for investors, who could see 25% upside and expanded profit margins. 

Follow-Up: Positive on DIS: Problems arising from the planned departure of chief operating officer Tom Staggs should be manageable, and are more than offset by good news elsewhere in the company; Cautious on NEM: Stock has risen 62% on a jump of more than 15% in the price of gold, but despite signs of promise, shares aren't cheap, and investors should consider taking profits now. 

European Trader: Positive on Carrefour: Shares of French retailer "have been marked down in 2016, but worries about its growth prospects may be overblown, and the stock could offer a 20% upside." Asian Trader: The recent influx of money into Asia, and rising share prices there, present a challenge for investors, especially bargain-hunters. 

Emerging Markets: Emerging-market corporate bonds in countries such as India and Indonesia offer 5% annual returns and little risk (Positive on MercadoLibre, Naspers, Bharti Airtel, EMB, DBLEX). 

Commodities: Despite heavy production in the U.S., Canada, and Kurdish-controlled Iraq and a weak global economy, it's likely crude supplies will tighten, driving prices higher. 

Streetwise: Companies that will benefit from the government's newly imposed fiduciary rules for advisors include firms such as SCHW and AMTD that were already profiting from low fees.

FT : Luxury eyewear in the spotlight as brands focus in on sector

Luxury eyewear in the spotlight as brands focus in on sector

All eyes are on the $90bn global eyewear industry and the personalities fighting for a piece of it.
A once sleepy sector dominated by two groups — Italy’s Luxottica in frames, and Essilor of France in lenses — is being transformed into a hot bed of corporate activity because it is the convergence point of fashion and health trends, favourable demographics and the internet.

Its prospects for growth are attracting the attention of players from other industries. Gucci designer Alessandro Michele’s latest catwalk concepts paired ball gowns with globe-shaped nerd glasses while watchmaker Nick Hayek is selling brightly-coloured sunglasses to match his Swatch watches.
But the big question is how the incumbents will react. Leonardo Del Vecchio, billionaire founder and executive chairman of Luxottica, which owns the Ray-Ban and Oakley brands, has returned to the helm of his group at the age of 80. Investors are watching to see how Mr Del Vecchio will play out his last hand in an industry that he in effect created as a younger man.
“We are at a moment in the industry when you have to do something unexpected. We are at a crossroads of technology and changes in consumer patterns of behaviour,” says Carlo Alberto Carnevale-Maffè, an expert on corporate change at Milan’s Bocconi University’s School of Management.
The main factor driving change is demographic shifts, especially in Asia.
Of the 7.3bn people in the world today, 63 per cent are considered to be in need of vision correction, but only 1.9bn have purchased glasses, contact lenses or surgery. More than 2.5bn are still in need, particularly in Asia, Africa and Latin America, according to industry data.
Meanwhile, the risks of damage from increasingly potent sunshine, UV and blue light are pushing sunglasses from being considered a “nice to have” item to a “must have” among emerging middle classes.
The longer-term outlook for the industry is “optimistic” with a compound annual growth rate of 2.5 per cent forecast for 2015 to 2020, says May Ling Tham, head of personal accessories and eyewear research at Euromonitor.
“We are even more convinced that eyecare is a fantastic business to be in as powerful drivers are likely to make richer an already rich industry,” write Citi analysts Mauro Baragiola and Thomas Chauvet.
The industry is also carving out a niche in the luxury products sector. Analysts estimate that annual sales of high-end sunglasses and spectacles — those priced at €200 and more — are worth €13bn and rising.
“Thanks to being linked to celebrities, eyewear products have been accepted as mainstream,” says Anna Cheng, eyewear industry analyst for Euromonitor.

Still, the current picture is not looking quite so pretty. Last year, overall industry sales fell 6 per cent as revenue was hit by currency fluctuations. Demand from Asia is ramping up, however, while the internet is also disrupting traditional retail networks. Consumers are buying more eyewear online, which has left the industry leaders on the back foot. And fashion groups such as Kering, the owner of Gucci, are “trying their hand” at building independent eyewear operations rather than licensing brands to traditional suppliers.
All these challenges are increasing the pressure on the sector leaders to do deals, say analysts and industry executives. “The industry is in flux,” says Luca Solca, analyst at Exane BNP Paribas.
At the epicentre of the ferment in the eyewear industry is its biggest personality, Mr Del Vecchio. Luxottica is the global leader with €7.7bn in sales and 78,000 employees. In addition to owning premium sunglasses brands — Ray-Ban and Oakley — the group also includes the Sunglass Hut retail chain and serves as the manufacturer for Armani, Prada and Chanel among many others.
Mr Del Vecchio has returned to the front line after seeing the departure of three chief executives in the past 18 months, including Andrea Guerra, Luxottica’s well-regarded chief executive of 10 years. Mr Del Vecchio is a lionised figure in Italian business, worth €20bn, who built his business after being orphaned and having spent his childhood partly in a poorhouse.
But his unexpected return has triggered a scattering of top executives beneath the C-suite and thrown into question the future of the group. Shares have dropped 20 per cent this year, even as Mr Del Vecchio has insisted the group is in “excellent hands”.
“I am not back to solve critical issues, but to fully seize new opportunities in retail, emerging markets, e-commerce and in our key brands such as Oakley and Ray-Ban,” said Mr Del Vecchio this month in a recorded speech to analysts. He said he will return to a non-executive role in a few years.
Luxottica insiders say the impression they have is that Mr Del Vecchio is back to do deals. He was the driving force behind the company’s transformative 1990s acquisitions of LensCrafters, Ray-Ban and Sunglass Hut. Luxottica this month said it plans to invest more than €1.5bn to revitalise and expand its business, a move that will, in the short term, hit its outlook for earnings growth.
Professor Carnevale-Maffe argues that it typically “takes an entrepreneur to make bold decisions”. But he notes that the return of Mr Del Vecchio, who distanced himself from management a decade ago, has reignited the “classic problem of an entrepreneur unable to detach himself from his creation”.

The potential megadeal that hangs over the sector would be a tie-up of Luxottica and Essilor, which has €5.7bn in sales and 58,000 staff. Analysts and bankers say a deal between two groups that each have a market capitalisation of about €23bn would create a company able to seize opportunities in both vision correction and sunglasses. A combination might also provide a natural successor to Mr Del Vecchio.
However, the two companies have been around the block before,
Essilor, led by French-Canadian chairman and chief executive Hubert Sagnierès, 60, approached Luxottica around three years ago to do a deal, according to insiders. The French group, which then was focused on healthcare, saw a combination as a way to get access to consumers. Luxottica saw little benefit and “closed the talks after a few months”, says one person familiar with the matter.
Today, Essilor is almost finished becoming a consumer-facing company. If a deal with Luxottica does not materialise, bankers and industry executives suggest Essilor could look to a smaller manufacturer such as Safilo, the Italian maker behind Polaroid and high-end eyewear maker for Céline, Dior and now Swatch.
If Essilor managed a buyout of Safilo, it would “be a game-changer for the industry”, says one industry insider, because it would put Essilor and Luxottica in direct competition.
Safilo is the industry’s third-largest player with €3bn in sales, increasingly squeezed between the titans, says Citi’s Mr Baragiola. But its chief executive, Luisa Delgado, a former head of P&G in the Nordics and a board member of Ikea, is representative of the new blood coming into the eyewear industry.
Since becoming chief executive in 2013, she has begun moving group manufacturing back from China to Padua in Italy as the company seeks to carve out an independent future as a high-end manufacturer.
In addition to producing expensive eyewear for designer brands, Ms Delgado is also pushing into the lower priced but rapidly growing “mass cool” segment. There, glasses usually retail for around €100 or less, putting them in reach of millennial spenders.
“It is like [clothing retailer] Zara, which had you buying maybe three pairs of trousers when you really only needed one,” she explains.
Ms Delgado says she is not in takeover talks, but adds: “We are constantly looking around like all companies to see something that is interesting, or not.”
If Safilo opts to be a buyer, analysts speculate that it could consider smaller manufacturers such as the US’s Marchon, or Italians De Rigo and Marcolin as possible targets.
The industry is also bracing for the impact of French luxury group Kering’s decision in 2014 to take back control of its eyewear business, including the Gucci brand. Kering has said it expects positive earnings contribution from 2017, although industry insiders say it will have a tough time building up manufacturing from scratch despite heavy investment.
Nonetheless, last month in Milan, Marco Bizzarri, chief executive of Gucci, the business mastermind behind the turnround of the “Double G” luxury brand, said at an industry event that the brand saw accessories such as jewellery and eyewear as a huge growth opportunity.
Watch this space.

WSJ : Dubai Developer Emaar Plans New ‘World’s Tallest’Tower

Dubai Developer Emaar Plans New ‘World’s Tallest’ Tower

New tower will be ‘a notch taller’ than current title holder, the Burj Khalifa

A simulation of the new Emaar Properties development in Dubai, "The Tower," designed by Santiago Calatrava Valls and planned to be the world's tallest, being slightly higher than current title holder, the Burj Khalifa.ENLARGE
A simulation of the new Emaar Properties development in Dubai, "The Tower," designed by Santiago Calatrava Valls and planned to be the world's tallest, being slightly higher than current title holder, the Burj Khalifa. PHOTO: EMAAR PROPERTIES

DUBAI—Dubai’s flagship developer Emaar Properties on Sunday unveiled plans to construct the world’s tallest tower in the Middle Eastern emirate, set to rise slightly above the Burj Khalifa that currently holds the title.

The announcement by Emaar underlines Dubai’s ambition to establish itself as a global investment and tourism hub by often pursuing futuristic megaprojects such as artificial islands off its coast or an indoor ski slope.

Emaar aims to deliver the tower, which won't be for residential use but contain an observation deck and possibly a small hotel, before Dubai hosts the World Expo fair in 2020. It will be situated in a yet-to-be built 6-square-kilometer residential and retail district next to Dubai’s creek and adjacent to a wildlife sanctuary.

“It [the height] will probably be announced when we open the tower but it will be a notch taller than the Burj Khalifa,” said Mohamed Alabbar, chairman of Emaar, at a preview event. The Burj Khalifa, also built by Emaar, currently tops out at 828 meters.

The building named as “The Tower” has been designed by Santiago Calatrava Valls, a Spanish-Swiss architect who also worked on the railway station at the rebuilt World Trade Center site in New York. The tower’s design is inspired by a lily and a minaret, the spire-like structure next to a mosque usually used for the Muslim call for prayer, according to Emaar.

With the new project, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia appear to be in a race toward building the world’s tallest tower. Jeddah Economic Co. expects to open the world’s future tallest skyscraper, which will comprise condominiums, office space and hotel rooms, by 2019.

Emaar’s plans for the new tower also come at a time when over the past year Dubai’s property market has lost some of its luster, after strongly rebounding from a devastating real estate crash that hit the region with the global financial crisis in 2009.

“Cycles happen in all economies, in all cities world-wide,” said Mr. Alabbar.

The Burj Khalifa, following completion in 2010, spurred development in downtown Dubai, a neighborhood that is now prime real estate. The Burj itself has become a tourist attraction and the city’s most marketable landmark.

WSJ : Germany’s Schäuble: Time Is Near to End Central Banks’ Easy-Money Policies

Germany’s Schäuble: Time Is Near to End Central Banks’ Easy-Money Policies

Finance Minister makes remarks amid growing criticism in Germany of European Central Bank

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble called on governments in Europe and the U.S. to encourage their central banks to gradually exit easy-money policies, in the strongest sign yet of Berlin’s growing impatience with the ultralow interest rates of the European Central Bank.

“There is a growing understanding that excessive liquidity has become more a cause than a solution to the problem,” Mr. Schäuble said, comparing the move away from easy-money policies to ending a drug addiction.

The unusually blunt comments from Chancellor Angela Merkel’s closest political ally come as the ECB has repeatedly ramped up its stimulus in recent months, seeking to support economic growth in the face of rising global headwinds and financial-market volatility.

While Mr. Schäuble’s opposition to the ECB’s monetary policy is well known, the veteran politician has voiced his criticism more openly lately, suggesting Berlin is growing impatient amid a mounting popular backlash against a policy that has depleted the returns on the savings of millions of Germans.

Government officials and central bankers are preparing to converge on Washington, D.C., next week for the Spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund, where they are expected to discuss policies to revive global growth.

Speaking in Kronberg near Frankfurt late Friday at a prize ceremony organized by a German economic think tank, Mr. Schäuble said he had just discussed central-bank policies with his U.S. counterpart, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew.

“I just said to Jack Lew that you should encourage the Federal Reserve and we should encourage the European Central Bank and the Bank of England in a concerted action, to carefully but slowly exit,” Mr. Schäuble said. In the U.S., the Treasury secretary doesn’t have authority over the Federal Reserve, which is tasked with setting monetary policy.

The ECB has twice ramped up its €1.5 trillion stimulus since December, most recently in March, when it rolled out a series of rate cuts, cheap loans for banks and an acceleration of bond purchases. Top ECB officials have stressed in recent days that they are ready to do even more to support the bloc’s economy.

Meanwhile Federal Reserve officials have signaled that the U.S. central bank will raise rates only gradually until the global economy picks up steam, according to the minutes of their March policy meeting. Japan’s central bank stunned the markets in January by setting the country’s first negative interest rates.

The ECB’s actions have faced growing criticism in Germany, where the economy and labor market are in robust health, but ultralow rates have hurt savers setting money aside for retirement.

Despite Germany’s insistence on central-bank independence, Mr. Schäuble has expressed growing concern about easy money policy in recent months. “I am not happy about low interest rates. I would prefer higher interest rates,” Mr. Schäuble said on Friday. He said he would meet ECB President Mario Draghi next week to discuss how to counter the growing criticism of ECB policies in Germany.

Jens Weidmann, who sits on the ECB’s governing council as president of Germany’s Bundesbank, opposed the ECB’s latest package of measures, which he has said went “too far.”

Mr. Schäuble also laid part of the blame for the rise of the populist Alternative for Germany at the ECB’s door. In state elections last month, the party made historic gains at the expense of Chancellor Merkel’s Christian Democrats and her coalition partners, the Social Democrats.

“I said to Mario Draghi…be very proud: you can attribute 50% of the results of a party that seems to be new and successful in Germany to the design of this [monetary] policy,” Mr. Schäuble said.

Peter Praet, the ECB’s top economist, hit back at the bank’s German critics on Thursday, arguing that its actions since June 2014 have “led to a substantial easing of financial conditions” that supported economic growth. Without them, eurozone inflation would have been around half a percentage point lower in 2016 and 2017 than the ECB currently forecasts, excluding the measures adopted last month, he said.

“[They say] money is worthless,” Mr. Praet said of the ECB’s German critics. “Thank you very much, give it to me if it is worthless.”

One major concern in Berlin is the recent debate about helicopter money, an extreme form of stimulus that involves direct distribution of money by central banks to the public. The concept has risen to prominence in recent months as central banks across advanced economies seek new ways to drive up stubbornly low inflation and convince investors they haven’t run out of policy ideas.

Mr. Draghi said last month that helicopter money was “a very interesting concept,” but his top officials have since sought to pour cold water on the idea.

“We are not considering anything of that sort,” ECB Vice President Vítor Constâncio told a committee of European lawmakers on Thursday.

German magazine Der Spiegel on Saturday cited unnamed finance ministry officials as saying that the government would consider legal action against the ECB if it adopted helicopter money.

A finance ministry spokesman said Saturday that the central bank was independent in its decisions, but that such “independence only exists within the limits of its legally given mandate.”

“It’s not true that the government is examining legal moves,” the spokesman said.

FT : YouTube music terms put labels in a spin

YouTube music terms put labels in a spin

Universal, Sony and Warner seek new relationship with Google-owned video site

After more than a decade of falling album sales and the further loss of revenues to digital piracy, the world’s three biggest music labels are facing a new challenge: a showdown with video site YouTube — and one that has profound implications for the global recording industry.
Over the coming months, Universal Music Group, Sony Music and Warner Music are each due to negotiate new licensing deals with the Google-owned video platform. None of the three music companies has commented in public, but each appears keen to “reset” its relationship with a service that has, to date, paid them relatively little for their content.
In terms of the amount of music streamed on-demand, YouTube has been a knockout hit — drawing more regular listeners and viewers than the likes of Spotify and Apple Music combined. “YouTube is free and is outperforming all the other music streaming services,” says Mark Mulligan, analyst with Midia Research.

However, music executives say their industry has not benefited from YouTube’s success. “We make peanuts from the ads,” says one, adding that YouTube Red, the paid-for subscription service launched last year, has yet to gain real traction.
Of greatest concern is the disparity between the amount of music listened to for free on the site and the revenues those tracks generate from advertising.
Last October, Jimmy Iovine, the head of Apple Music — and the former chief executive of Interscope Records — told the Vanity Fair New Establishment conference that YouTube was responsible for 40 per cent of all music consumption but generated only 4 per cent of the industry’s revenues. “They know that doesn’t work,” he said. “But do they care? I have no idea.”
At present, YouTube licenses music from Vevo, a music site controlled by Sony and UMG, and has separate deals with the labels and Warner Music. Meanwhile, users around the world upload unlicensed music on an hourly basis.
All of that music has made YouTube the world's biggest music platform. And it is still growing: the number of songs streamed for free on US ad-supported sites, of which YouTube is by far the biggest, rose 101 per cent in 2015. By contrast, associated revenues to the music industry increased 31 per cent, according to the Recording Industry Association of America.
In the US, ad-supported streaming earned even less for the music industry last year than sales of vinyl albums — prompting disbelief among senior industry figures. “Technology giants have been enriching themselves at the expense of the people who actually create the music,” claimed Cary Sherman, the RIAA’s chairman and chief executive, last week.
For the music industry, the favoured new format is paid-for subscription streaming. Paid-for, or premium, tiers operated by Spotify and Apple Music generate much better returns for music labels than advertising-supported services. “The monetisation from ad-supported is less than one-tenth of what we get from paid-for streaming music,” explains one senior music executive.
Nevertheless, YouTube insists comparisons between ad-supported music and paid-for subscription services are “apples to oranges”. In a statement released last week in response to the RIAA’s annual figures, it pointed to the more than $3bn it had paid the music industry. “That number is growing year on year,” it said.
A person close to YouTube says it is able to generate money from casual music fans who would never pay for an album or a streaming service. “Only about 20 per cent of people have historically been willing to pay for music,” the person argues. “YouTube is helping artists and labels monetise the remaining 80 per cent that were not previously monetised.”
He adds that the global advertising market is now worth $200bn — giving music acts plenty of potential to earn a bigger piece of the pie. “This is a tremendous opportunity,” he says,

Still, the labels are unhappy that they are not receiving more of the advertising revenues currently generated on YouTube. So the big question is whether they have the leverage to demand a bigger share.
Music now represents as much as 35 per cent of all YouTube traffic, according to Mr Mulligan, a mix of licensed music videos and tracks illegally uploaded by users.
If the companies that owned the legal rights to that music threatened to take it elsewhere — or make YouTube take it down — might the video site them an improved deal?
It is not clear that the music companies have the stomach for such a fight. Refusing to grant YouTube licences for music videos would not stop the video site's users from uploading music illegally. And the legal responsibility for spotting such illegally uploaded content rests with the music labels themselves. They must issue a “takedown notice” to YouTube, which is obliged to remove the track.
However, as soon as an illegally uploaded version of a track is removed, it usually quickly appears somewhere else. “Asking for illegal music to be taken down is like playing constant ‘whack-a-mole’,” says Mr Mulligan.
Critics say YouTube could do much more to filter out music-based content that has been uploaded illegally. “It has the technology to block pornography and other inappropriate content,” points out Jonathan Taplin, director of the Annenberg Innovation Lab at the University of Southern California. “It could use the same tools to screen out every piece of music that hasn’t been specifically licensed.”
Under the law as it stands, YouTube is protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which gives websites "safe harbour" from prosecution if they are found to be hosting unlicensed content. This has led several music stars — ranging from Katy Perry and Bootsy Collins to Barry Manilow — to support campaigners for a reform of the DMCA.

But with DMCA reform not likely to happen imminently, the three big music companies want better terms from YouTube.
One option that they have floated is to hold new tracks off the site for a period of six weeks to compel the keenest fans to either buy them as a download or take out a paid subscription. Such “windowing” of content is commonplace in Hollywood, says Prof Taplin. “The movie business has worked this way for years . . . it would make a big difference in music.”
Any tightening of the free music available on YouTube could also give the labels leverage in another contentious debate: how much of their music is offered free on Spotify, to attract users who might later be converted into paying subscribers. Most of the Swedish group’s near 100m active users listen for free, with roughly 30m paying. The labels — and the likes of singer Taylor Swift — want to increase this number and limit the free service but Spotify has, so far, resisted.
A person close to Spotify says it might reassess this policy, but only if there was less free new music available on YouTube.
While the labels prepare for a fight, YouTube remains convinced its model can work for everybody. Plenty of people disagree — particularly with the idea that it does not affect the number of people prepared to pay for music. “You can look for any music that you are interested in and find it on YouTube — that has to harm the paid services,” says James McQuivey, analyst with Forrester Research. “There’s never been a commodity in the world where giving it away for free didn’t affect people’s willingness to pay.”
Sound strategy: Vevo plans paid music streaming
With Spotify and Apple Music battling it out for supremacy in subscription streaming, is there space for Vevo to establish itself as a player? The music video business — which is majority-owned by the world’s two largest music companies, Universal Music Group and Sony Music — is working on a paid service, with the aim of launching it by the end of this year.
Vevo does not have the rights to Warner Music content, which means it will probably have to bring the label on board or come to a licensing agreement before launch.
Still, Erik Huggers, the former BBC and Intel manager who was hired as chief executive last year, is keen to launch a subscription offering that would have an emphasis on original video content, using documentaries and other programmes to supplement its music videos.
With Spotify, Apple Music and Facebook keen to carry more music-related video content, and YouTube recently launching paid service Red, a Vevo launch comes at a competitive time for the streaming industry.

FT : US faces ‘disastrous’ $3.4tn pension funding hole

The US public pension system has developed a $3.4tn funding hole that will pile pressure on cities and states to cut spending or raise taxes to avoid Detroit-style bankruptcies.
According to academic research shared exclusively with FTfm, the collective funding shortfall of US public pension funds is three times larger than official figures showed, and is getting bigger.

Devin Nunes, a US Republican congressman, said: “It has been clear for years that many cities and states are critically underfunding their pension programmes and hiding the fiscal holes with accounting tricks.”
Mr Nunes, who put forward a bill to the House of Representatives last month to overhaul how public pension plans report their figures, added: “When these pension funds go insolvent, they will create problems so disastrous that the fund officials assume the federal government will have to bail them out.”
Large pension shortfalls have already played a role in driving several US cities, including Detroit in Michigan and San Bernardino in California, to file for bankruptcy. The fear is other cities will soon become insolvent due to the size of their pension deficits.
Joshua Rauh, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a think-tank, and professor of finance at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, who carried out the study, said: “The pension problems are threatening to consume state and local budgets in the absence of some major changes.
“It is quite likely that over a five to 10-year horizon we are going to see more bankruptcies of cities where the unfunded pension liabilities will play a large role.”
The Stanford study found that the states of Illinois, Arizona, Ohio and Nevada, and the cities of Chicago, Dallas, Houston and El Paso have the largest pension holes compared with their own revenues.
In order to deal with the large funding shortfall, many cities and states will have to increase their contributions to their pension funds, either by raising taxes or cutting spending on vital services.
Olivia Mitchell, a professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, told FTfm last month that US public pension plans face “grave difficulties”.
“I do believe that US cities and towns will continue to suffer, and there will be additional bankruptcies following the examples of Detroit,” she said.
Currently, states and local governments contribute 7.3 per cent of revenues to public pension plans, but this would need to increase to an average of 17.5 per cent of revenues to stop any further rises in the funding gap, the research said.
Several cities and states, including California, Illinois, New Jersey, Chicago and Austin, would need to put at least 20 per cent of their revenues into their pension plans to prevent a rise in their deficits, while Nevada would have to contribute almost 40 per cent.
Mr Rauh’s study claims the “true extent” of funding problems in US public pension system has been obscured because plans calculate both their costs and liabilities on the assumption they will achieve returns of between 7 and 8 per cent a year. The academic believes this rate is “wildly optimistic and unlikely to be achieved”.
Mr Rauh said a more realistic return rate, based on US Treasury bond yields, was around 2-3 per cent a year.
However, Hank Kim, executive director at the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems, a trade association for public pension plans in the US, called Mr Rauh’s study a “manipulation of arithmetic”.
“The [public pension] plans are in good shape and are headed to being in even better shape,” he said.
Mr Kim added that public pension funds set their return targets at 7.5 per cent because that is what they have been able to achieve historically.
US public pensions recorded an average annual return of 7.3 per cent in the 10 years to the end of June 2014, according to Cliffwater, an investment consultancy.
“Over a long-term trend, that 7.5 per cent return rate is absolutely feasible,” he said.

FT : ‘Systemic’ antibiotics crisis troubles big investors

Big investors managing $1tn of assets have called on the world’s largest food companies to end the excessive use of antibiotics in their meat supply chains, amid fears “systemic overuse” of these drugs is damaging human health and hurting financial returns.
Fast food retailers McDonald’s and Domino’s Pizza, JD Wetherspoon, the British pub chain, and seven other global restaurant groups have been contacted by the coalition of 54 asset managers and pension funds.

The coalition includes Aviva Investors, the £290bn UK fund house, Natixis Asset Management, the €331bn French asset manager, and Coller Capital, the private equity firm.
These investors have urged companies to stop their meat and poultry suppliers using antibiotics that are vital for human health, after the World Health Organisation warned that irresponsible use is leading to a “post-antibiotic era”.
The concern is that the use of antibiotics in livestock is causing antibiotic resistance in humans. The WHO said in 2014 that antibiotic resistance is a “threat so serious that it threatens the achievements of modern medicine”. “Common infections and minor injuries which have been treatable for decades can once again kill,” the organisation warned.
Abigail Herron, head of responsible investment engagement at Aviva Investors, said her company sees antibiotic resistance as a “systemically important” issue because the UK fund house has “exposure to pharmaceutical companies, food retailers and food producers”.
“We face potentially unmitigated health and financial impacts if the excessive use of antibiotics in livestock production is not addressed,” she said.
“It is pretty scary. Resistance to antibiotics is developing far faster than antibiotics are being developed. We need to be preserving what antibiotics we have left and not using them [in food production].”
Around half of all antibiotics produced in the UK are given to livestock, with the figure rising to 80 per cent in the US, the coalition said. Antibiotics are typically given to prevent disease in animals, such as chickens and pigs, reared in close quarters.
Jeremy Coller, chief investment officer of Coller Capital and founder of the Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return (Fairr) Initiative, which aims to highlight poor farming standards to investors, added that food producers that do not reduce antibiotic use are likely to face costly regulation in future.
“These large food companies are key ingredients in the portfolios of most of our pensions and savings — thus it is a case of proper risk management to ask them to work out how they will meet this challenge,” he said.
The investor coalition said half of the 10 restaurant companies contacted have no publicly available policies in place on how they manage or mitigate antibiotic overuse in their supply chains.
Catherine Howarth, chief executive of ShareAction, a responsible investment charity that brought the investor collation together with the Fairr Initiative, said: “For a long period, restaurants in this group of companies have relied on meat where the animals are closely confined and are fed antibiotics to prevent disease. This is becoming a supply-chain risk.”
In response to the coalition’s concerns, JD Weatherspoon said that “antibiotics are only used on prescription by a qualified vet and never as growth promoters” in its food chain.
Domino’s said its suppliers are only allowed to use antibiotics when necessary to treat disease.
McDonald’s said it is “monitoring, controlling and reducing the use of antibiotics among chickens in our supply chain”. “We have a policy that bans the use of the highest-priority critically important antibiotics for human medicine, as designated by [the] WHO, in our chicken supply chain by 2018,” it added.

>>> Enel looks to conclude talks over buying stake in Metroweb in two-three week

Enel looks to conclude talks over buying stake in Metroweb in two-three weeks - Il Sole 24 Ore

Enel, the listed Italian utilities group, is looking to conclude talks over taking a stake in Metroweb, the Italian fibre optic operator in the next two-three weeks, Italian language daily Il Sole 24 Ore reported. The unsourced report added that a technical meeting was held on the matter on 8 April that was attended by Tommaso Pompei, the CEO of Enel Open Fiber, the subsidiary through which Enel would buy the stake and Renato Ravanelli, the CEO of F2i, the infrastructure fund that currently holds 53.8% of Metroweb.

Enel is being advised by JPMorgan while Metroweb has Banca Imi as advisor, it said.

The report said that if the talks are successful, Enel will take a 48-49% stake in a newco containing Metroweb and its subsidiaries instead of the 30% holding that had been rumoured before. It was unclear whether the newco would include Metroweb Milano, which operates Milan's fibre optic network, it said.

A 46.2% stake in Metroweb is held by FSI, the investment fund controlled by CdP, the holding of the Italian Treasury, the report noted.

Telecom Italia, which had previously been in negotiations to take control of Metroweb, is seeking to return to the table and has contacted Cdp on the matter, the report said. TI could make a formal offer prior to Enel inking a deal, it said.

TI had been looking for a 67% stake in the newco with an option to increase that to 100%, the report said.

As previously reported, Metroweb is seeking to raise EUR 2.5bn to extend a fibre optic network to 250 towns and cities.

Il Sole 24 Ore