Barron's : AI Data Centers Need More Power Right Now. These Companies Can Delive

AI Data Centers Need More Power Right Now. These Companies Can Deliver It.
A new group of players in the AI power race are posting huge stocks gains. Their futures look bright.

Key Points
  • A new group of companies, including Caterpillar and Cummins, are benefiting from the urgent need for on-site power solutions for data centers.
  • The shift is driven by tech companies’ need for rapid power access and political pressure to reduce data centers’ reliance on the main grid.
  • Companies like Bloom Energy, Liberty Energy, and Pro Petro are repurposing existing technologies or offering fuel cells to provide quick, localized power for data centers.

or more than a year, a handful of companies have racked up huge stock gains by riding the hottest theme in energy investing—artificial intelligence power demand. They are the owners of power plants that send electrons to the grid, such as Constellation Energy, Vistra, and Talen Energy, and the manufacturers of big turbines that generate electricity, like GE Vernova and Siemens Energy.

Those companies are still bound to benefit from AI demand. But their stocks are starting to flatten out or fall, a sign investors have begun to look elsewhere. The stocks of a new group of firms have lately been surging and could take a more central role as the AI race takes shape. They include companies not usually associated with electricity generation, including construction giant Caterpillar; engine maker Cummins; oil services firms Baker Hughes, Liberty Energy, and ProPetro Holding; and alternative-energy company Bloom Energy.

The shift is being driven by two main factors: a need for speed and a change in the politics of electricity.

The speed angle is self-evident. Tech companies need to get their data centers plugged in today, or risk being stuck with expensive Nvidia chips that aren’t connected to electricity. The biggest challenge for Microsoft now is getting access to electricity, said CEO Satya Nadella on a recent podcast. “It’s the ability to get the builds done fast enough, close to power. If you can’t do that, you may actually have a bunch of chips sitting in inventory that I can’t plug in. In fact, that is my problem today.”

At the same time, politicians in both parties have become hypersensitive to electricity inflation, which played a role in this month’s election wins by Democrats in New Jersey, Virginia, and Georgia, and looms large before next year’s midterm congressional races. In some states, data centers have been blamed for causing electricity prices to rise, because utilities need to spend money on building transmission lines and power plants to serve them. One way to alleviate that concern is for data centers to rely less on the normal electricity grid to power their sites. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, for instance, has proposed that data-center projects that can arrange for their own on-site power sources should get fast-tracked.


Such a policy—and the need for speed—plays into the hands of companies like Caterpillar, Baker Hughes, and Cummins, all of which make engines or turbines that have historically been used in other business lines. Caterpillar’s natural-gas turbines and specialized engines are used in areas like energy to pump fuels through pipelines, for instance. But they can also be repurposed to provide electricity for data centers.

Unlike big turbines made by companies like GE Vernova that can generate over 500 megawatts of power, Caterpillar’s most powerful units have 39 megawatts of capacity, and they are considered much less efficient than the state-of-the-art turbines made by bigger players. But with big turbines on back order for years, data-center players will take whatever they can get their hands on. The repurposed gear can be trucked quickly to data centers and rigged up on site.

Meta Platforms chose to use Caterpillar’s turbines at an Ohio data center that will be built so that it can operate off the electricity grid. Stargate, the massive data center project backed by OpenAI, is also using Caterpillar turbines at its Texas facility. Cummins, known for making engines for trucks and heavy machinery, is now supplying them to Digital Realty, the world’s largest data-center provider.

Caterpillar announced at its investor day on Nov. 4 that it’s doubling its production of engines and increasing its capacity to build gas turbines by 2.5 times by 2030. J.P. Morgan analyst Tami Zakaria wrote last month that Caterpillar’s power business could add at least $10 to its annual earnings per share in the next three years. Caterpillar earned $21.92 per share in 2024. Zakaria sees the stock rising to $730 from a recent $576.

Oil services companies have also been unlikely winners from this trend. Both Liberty Energy and ProPetro, best known for their expertise in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, have jumped headlong into the data- center game. They have access to turbines through their oil businesses and are planning to use them to serve tech companies. Before this, their stocks were in the dumps because of a slowdown in oil drilling. But in recent weeks, they have started inking data-center deals, and the stocks are flying.

Similar dynamics have helped Bloom Energy, which makes fuel cells that work like batteries. They can provide on-site power for all sorts of users, from data centers to industrial sites. Bloom has made deals with companies such as Oracle to deploy its fuel cells, and the stock has quintupled this year. Companies that need power quickly can simply buy Bloom’s fuel cells, which are about the size of large refrigerators, instead of waiting for permission to connect to the grid. “We are entering the age of BYOP—bring your own power,” said KR Sridhar, CEO of Bloom Energy, on the company’s earnings call. “We love this proposition.”

Enthusiasm for these new stocks has drawn attention away from some of the old winners, like GE Vernova and Vistra. Both are down by double-digits over the past month. In GE Vernova’s case, investors should consider the dip an opportunity, writes J.P. Morgan analyst Mark Strouse.

Similarly, Angie Storozynski, an analyst at Seaport Research Partners, has Buy ratings on Constellation, Vistra, and Talen, despite her concerns that they haven’t signed enough data-center deals lately. She thinks those companies still have advantages in the data-center race because they’re proven operators of baseload generation. But she expects that their advantages will erode with time. “It will not last forever,” she says. “I’m trying to be patient.”

The data-center race has entered a new stage. The clock is ticking.

Barron's : Berkshire Without Buffett: What’s Next for the Company and the Stock

Berkshire Without Buffett: What’s Next for the Company and the Stock
As the legendary investor prepares to step down as CEO, here’s what his designated successor, Greg Abel, should do to bring Berkshire into the 21st century.

Key Points
  • Warren Buffett will step down as Berkshire Hathaway’s CEO after 60 years, with Greg Abel taking over, though Buffett will remain chairman.
  • Berkshire Hathaway stock has risen 11% in 2025, lagging behind the S&P 500’s 16% gain, and has underperformed the index over the past three, 10, and 15 years.
  • Berkshire Hathaway has a market value over $1 trillion, nearly $50 billion in after-tax earnings power, and over $350 billion in cash.

It’s the end of an era for Berkshire Hathaway as Warren Buffett prepares to step aside as CEO. Investors shouldn’t worry about the change—in fact, they should welcome it.

The CEO succession promises to be one of the most closely watched in American business. After 60 years at the helm, the 95-year-old Buffett will pass the baton to Greg Abel, his handpicked successor. Buffett won’t be disappearing from the scene—he will remain chairman and plans to be in the office every day at Berkshire’s Omaha, Neb., headquarters to offer advice—but the company won’t be the same.

Nor should it. Buffett fans might not like to hear it, but the CEO transition is coming at a good time. Buffett has slowed down in recent years and grown increasingly cautious. Berkshire’s massive cash holdings have been a drag on performance; Buffett has been selling stock, when he should have been buying; and recent acquisitions have left much to be desired. Berkshire stock has risen 13% in 2025, lagging behind the S&P 500’s 16% gain, and it has underperformed the index over the past three, 10, and 15 years. It’s a very un-Buffett-like performance.

Enter Abel. The 63-year-old executive and Berkshire veteran has spoken at the company’s annual meeting, but he’s something of an unknown quantity. He ran Berkshire’s energy operations before becoming vice chairman and head of the company’s vast non-insurance businesses in 2018. He has Buffett’s trust. But for Abel to succeed, he can’t follow his mentor’s lead.

If the case for investing in Berkshire once rested on Buffett, it will now have to thrive as a “normal” company, and it should do some things it never had to: pay a dividend, hold quarterly earnings conference calls, and perhaps even move to index some of Berkshire’s equity investments. Berkshire needs to become a different company—and it must play to Abel’s strengths.


“Abel has a strong operational and financial management background,” says Cathy Seifert, a CFRA analyst. “He doesn’t have professional money-management experience, and he doesn’t have the Street cred like Buffett.”

Buffett’s Street cred was built up over 60 years, and despite the recent weakness, he is leaving Berkshire in great shape. The company has a market value of over $1 trillion, nearly $50 billion of after-tax earnings power from a diverse group of businesses, a $300 billion equity portfolio led by Apple and American Express, and what Buffett calls a Fort Knox balance sheet with over $350 billion in cash.

Berkshire is also the world’s largest conglomerate, at a time when conglomerates have fallen out of favor. Property-and-casualty insurance is its most important division—it accounts for a quarter of revenue and about half its value—and includes Geico, the No. 3 auto insurer in the country. The other key units include Burlington Northern Santa Fe, one of the two big railroads west of the Mississippi River; Berkshire Hathaway Energy, a large electric utility that also owns natural-gas pipelines; and a real estate brokerage business. Each is probably worth $100 billion or more.

Then there are dozens of other divisions, including Lubrizol (chemicals), Pilot (truck stops), Precision Castparts (aircraft parts), and odds and ends like International Dairy Queen, Duracell batteries, and NetJets, a leader in fractional private-jet travel. Assessing the whole, Buffett wrote this past week in a Thanksgiving letter to Berkshire shareholders that Berkshire’s businesses in aggregate have “moderately better than average prospects led by a few non-correlated and sizable gems.”


Buffett’s performance hasn’t met the “moderately better than average” bar in recent years. While he is renowned for his acquisition skills, the past decade and a half of takeovers has been disappointing. Lubrizol’s earnings are no higher than when Berkshire bought the company for $9.7 billion in 2011, and Berkshire’s stake in Kraft Heinz —the successor to Heinz—is worth less than the $9 billion Berkshire put into the investment. Precision Castparts is now worth more than the $37 billion that Berkshire paid for it, but it has taken 10 years to get there, and almost any other aerospace-related investment would have done better—even Boeing. Berkshire’s $13 billion purchase of Pilot looks fair, not great, while the 2022 purchase of insurer Alleghany for under $12 billion is one of the few real winners. Overall, Berkshire would have done much better to put the $80 billion it plowed into the five buys into an S&P 500 index fund.

Berkshire, moreover, is a 20th-century company without a meaningful tech subsidiary and just one sizable tech equity investment, a $76 billion stake in Apple. New winning equity investments in the past five years have been few, aside from a group of Japanese trading companies, and Berkshire sold numerous stocks in 2020-22 at a fraction of their current prices, including JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.

Buffett also cashed out a $100 billion gain on his best investment, Apple, but has left about $50 billion on the table given Apple’s subsequent gains, Barron’s estimates. The Apple sales are partly responsible for Berkshire’s $350 billion-plus in cash—a figure that even Buffett has conceded is high. “Berkshire missed the stock market rally while hoarding cash,” says Jim Shanahan, an Edward Jones analyst.

Still, there is some trepidation over Buffett’s impending departure. Berkshire stock has lagged behind the S&P 500 by over 20 percentage points since Buffett made the surprise announcement at the company’s annual meeting in May that he would step down at year end. Some of the “Buffett premium” has leaked out of the stock. Since then, Berkshire stock has dropped 5%, while the S&P 500 has gained 20%.

Buffett, though, isn’t stepping away completely. Along with remaining chairman, he plans to keep a “significant amount” of Berkshire stock until Abel establishes himself. Buffett owns just under 14% of the company—a stake worth $150 billion—and holds about 30% of the vote because nearly all of his stake consists of class A supervoting shares, as opposed to the B shares favored by most individual investors. He’s giving away about 5% of that stake annually.

Abel, for his part, is no slouch. While Buffett has taken a more hands-off approach—he preferred investing to managing—Abel is a capable operational and financial manager whom the Oracle of Omaha credits with improving the performance of Berkshire’s subsidiaries. Buffett has repeatedly expressed confidence in Abel and his ability to guide Berkshire, a view he reiterated this past week, writing in his Thanksgiving letter that he is a “great manager, a tireless worker and an honest communicator. Wish him an extended tenure.”

But even Buffett had Charlie Munger, Berkshire’s late vice chairman, to help him. Abel, who will address Berkshire investors in the annual shareholder letter around March 1, hasn’t said much about whom he plans to lean on as he takes command of the Berkshire empire. The company has some strong executives, but certain key people could follow Buffett into retirement. Besides Abel, Berkshire’s most important executive is Ajit Jain, 74, the head of insurance operations, a brilliant insurance risk assessor and a Buffett confidant for nearly 40 years. He may retire in the next year or two. Potential replacements are the Berkshire insurance executives Kara Raiguel of reinsurer General Re and Joe Brandon of Alleghany.


Then there are investment managers Todd Combs, 54, and Ted Weschler, 64, who now run about 10% of the $300 billion equity portfolio, with Buffett handling the rest. When they joined Berkshire more than a decade ago, Buffett said they would take it over when he stepped aside, but he later said in annual meetings that Abel should run the portfolio, raising questions about Weschler and Combs’ future role. Combs also has run Geico, Berkshire’s auto insurance unit, for six years, but that job—which was supposed to be temporary—could be nearing an end with Geico’s financial revival in the past two years.

Berkshire has no functions common in big corporations, such as investor relations, public relations, or corporate counsel, and Abel may want to add some of these areas and get help running Berkshire. He could also draw on former colleagues from his tenure at Berkshire’s utility business, including Adam Wright, who now heads Berkshire’s Pilot truck-stop unit. Abel might also do something un-Berkshire-like, and look outside the company for talent.

With conglomerates on the outs with investors who prefer pure-play companies, some will argue that Berkshire should be broken up. But it’s a tribute to Buffett that the number of companies seeking to become more Berkshire-like by combining insurance and investments keeps growing. That includes heavyweight asset managers such as Apollo Global Management, KKR, and Brookfield, as well as investors like Bill Ackman, who wants to build a mini-Berkshire with a real estate company, Howard Hughes Holdings. In Berkshire, investors can buy the real thing, with all of its advantages.

“Every activist and investment banker will argue that, in a world without Warren and Charlie, Berkshire’s unorthodox structure shouldn’t persist. I think Berkshire is worth defending,” said Chris Davis, an investment manager and Berkshire board member in a 2023 Barron’s interview. Davis said the board’s role will be to protect Berkshire’s culture.

Abel, though, should consider spinoffs or sales of smaller businesses. Berkshire is too big to be managed optimally. It has over 60 subsidiaries, but only 10 really matter. He should also loosen some of Buffett’s strictures on acquisitions, but stick with what he knows. Berkshire, for instance, hasn’t participated in corporate auctions, and that limits its flexibility. Buffett, though, has been willing to buy anything if he liked the business and the price was right. Abel should focus on his circle of competence, notably energy and utilities. Berkshire’s recent $9.7 billion deal to purchase Occidental Petroleum’s chemical business is in keeping with that approach.

Even with its current business mix, Berkshire should be able to top the S&P 500—assuming intelligent capital allocation—especially if index returns are more moderate than the 14% annual gains over the past decade. Here’s the math: Berkshire’s stock price has long followed growth in its shareholder equity, or book value. With its earnings power, and assuming modest stock market gains, Berkshire should be able to generate high-single-digit annual growth in book value in coming years, and that could translate into similar gains in the stock. This all makes Berkshire a good choice for conservative investors.


“The thing that gives me comfort is the absolute financial strength of the company,” says Bill Stone, chief investment officer of Glenview Trust. “It owns a diversified group of businesses, and the balance sheet is amazing. You sleep well at night owning it.” Buffett underscored the safety of Berkshire, writing this past week that “Berkshire has less chance of a devastating disaster than any business I know.”

Edward Jones’ Shanahan is bullish, given what he sees as the company’s reasonable valuation of about 1.5 times book value. That is admittedly in line with its average of the past five years. It trades for about 22 times this year’s earnings—in line with the overall market. Berkshire watchers focus on a measure called “look-through earnings,” which gives it credit for the profits of the companies in its equity portfolio. That adjusted price/earnings ratio is in the high teens.

Abel will have some tough decisions to make, starting with what to do with Berkshire’s cash hoard. It’s one thing for the company to bank hundreds of billions of dollars with Buffett in charge, but investors may want Abel to offer a plan to bring it down. A big acquisition seems unlikely given the elevated stock market. Abel’s plan could include buying back stock—Berkshire hasn’t repurchased shares since May 2024—but it should also pay a dividend, something the company hasn’t done since paying a tiny one in the late 1960s and nearly every non-tech megacap company does. Investors have been comfortable letting Buffett invest Berkshire’s cash and earnings, but with Abel at the helm, the argument for resisting a dividend breaks down.

A 2% dividend would cost Berkshire about $20 billion annually—less than 50% of its operating earnings. Even with that payout, Berkshire’s cash levels wouldn’t decline. That even argues for a potential special dividend. The downside for Buffett is that he would have to pay over $500 million a year in taxes if Berkshire paid a 2% dividend, given the size of his stake. That isn’t a reason not to pay one, though. A dividend is likely after Buffett’s death, so why not pay one now.

Abel will also have to decide what to do with Berkshire’s investment portfolio. Buffett has said that if Berkshire can’t top the market, investors might as well buy a low-fee S&P 500 index fund. It’s something Abel should consider with part of Berkshire’s equity portfolio. Berkshire’s stock-picking record in the past decade has been mixed: a big hit with Apple and Japanese trading companies, but several misses, including buying a big stake in Occidental stock before it bought the chemical business. Combs and Weschler probably have underperformed, too, with the latter believed to be responsible for two longtime portfolio underperformers, DaVita and Sirius XM Holdings.

Abel could also name a chief investment officer to oversee Berkshire’s entire portfolio, which is dominated by stocks. He could also start building a bond portfolio, like other insurers who park most of their investments in fixed-income securities. Berkshire runs a “barbell” portfolio of cash—over $350 billion—and stocks—$300 billion—and just $17 billion of bonds.

Abel’s ultimate success will depend on establishing his credibility—and Berkshire’s—without Buffett. He should start by buying more Berkshire stock. While nearly all of Buffett’s net worth is in Berkshire, that’s unlikely the case for Abel. He bought about $100 million of stock in late 2022 and early 2023, and his total stake is now worth $175 million.

That’s bigger than what most CEOs own. His net worth, however, is likely close to $1 billion after he sold a 1% stake in Berkshire Hathaway Energy back to the company for nearly $900 million in cash in 2022, and he earns more than $20 million a year. Buying stock at current levels would be a sign of confidence and commitment by Abel to Berkshire holders.

He should hold quarterly earnings conference calls, which would allow investors to better evaluate the complex company. He should also provide better financial disclosure by regularly releasing profit numbers on Lubrizol and other businesses, something Berkshire currently doesn’t do. More information on the insurance operations would be helpful, too, including policy trends at Geico.


More than anything, Abel must spin a new story. Buffett has said there are three million Berkshire shareholder accounts, a huge figure that somewhat overstates the number of individual investors. The company will need a new base to replace an aging group of individual holders. To attract them, Abel will need to articulate a vision for a post-Buffett Berkshire. It could be something like this:

“I plan to build on the platform that Warren Buffett created and use Berkshire’s durable and ample earnings for investments, acquisitions, share repurchases, and dividends. Berkshire will be a more focused company under my leadership, with greater financial transparency, and maintain a Fort Knox balance sheet.

“I realize I can’t be Warren Buffett. But with the help of our talented managers, I pledge to improve our subsidiaries and turn what is the largest conglomerate in the world into the best-run conglomerate. My goal is to attract a new generation of investors to Berkshire and position the company to produce market-beating returns over time.”

With over 80% of its revenue from the U.S. and a group of diversified businesses, Berkshire is the closest thing to a mutual fund in the stock market, and it should remain a worthwhile investment.

As long as Abel proves able.

>>> Engaged Capital (Glenn Welling) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F

Engaged Capital (Glenn Welling) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New CGNX BL positions
Highlights from Q3 2025 filing as compared to Q2 2025 (all amounts are approximate):
  • New: CGNX (855K), BL (454K)
  • Increased: VFC (5.9 mln from 5.4 mln), BRCC (13936K from 13536K), PTLO (5069K from 4832K), GXO (978K from 897K)
  • Maintained: YETI (2.2 mln), FRPT (619K)
  • Decreased: EVH (5.7 mln from 5.9 mln)

>>> Tiger Global discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New NTSK M

Tiger Global discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New NTSK MDB NFLX FIGR KLAR BLSH ARX GEMI FIG positions, Exits ZKH LLY NVO CRWD, Added to CPNG XYZ AMZN CPAY FLUT AVGO GEV
Highlights from Q3 2025 filing as compared to Q2 2025 (all amounts are approximate):
  • New: NTSK (500K), MDB (341K), NFLX (202K), FIGR (200K), KLAR (175K), BLSH (100K), ARX (75K), GEMI (70K), FIG (60K), VIA (15K)
  • Increased: CPNG (15.8 mln shares from 13.6 mln shares), XYZ (4.4 mln from 3.9 mln), AMZN (11.0 mln from 10.7 mln), CPAY (1.8 mln from 1.5 mln), FLUT (3.7 mln from 3.5 mln), AVGO (2.9 mln from 2.7 mln), GEV (1.2 mln from 1.1 mln)
  • Maintained: GRAB (92.9 mln shares), SE (16.0 mln), NVDA (11.7 mln), GOOGL (10.6 mln), MSFT (6.55 mln), APO (6.2 mln), TTWO (5.8 mln), LRCX (5.3 mln), TSM (4.6 mln), VEEV (2.4 mln), APP (2 mln), ZS (1.7 mln), SPOT (1.3 mln)
  • Exited: ZKH (from 8 mln shares), LLY (1.5 mln), NVO (1.3 mln), CRWD (0.5 mln)
  • Decreased: META (2.8 mln shares from 7.5 mln shares), RDDT (4.7 mln from 6.15 mln), Z (5.05 mln from 6.23 mln), SHW (330K from 1.2 mln), ZG (783K from 1 mln)

>>> Duquesne (Stanley Druckenmiller) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13

Duquesne (Stanley Druckenmiller) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New STUB CLF FIGR AMZN CRH positions, Exited WBD ENTG BCS CZR COHR KMI CCC
Highlights from Q3 2025 filing as compared to Q2 2025 (all amounts are approximate):
  • New: STUB (4.3 mln shares), CLF (2.7 mln), FIGR (2.1 mln), EEM (1.9 mln), AEVA (1.8 mln), PCG (1.65 mln), COGT (1.06 mln), KBE (482K), AMZN (437K), CRH (394K), SMTC (302K), FWONK (288K), SYF (262K), VST (234K), CMG (233K), POST (176K), ARM (168K), SNDK (166K), PTGX (160K), SEI (146K), GPC (144K), DKS (132K), GOOGL (102K)
  • Increased: NAMS (1.9 mln shares from 0.8 mln shares), TBBB (1.18 mln from 0.36 mln), BAC (0.99 mln from 0.3 mln), TEVA (16.59 mln from 15.97 mln), CPNG (4.6 mln from 4.1 mln), ELVN (0.95 mln from 0.46 mln), DOCU (1.69 mln from 1.29 mln), QSR (1.1 mln from 0.75 mln), OPCH (978K from 637K), TWLO (513K from 200K), LEN (279K from 90K), WAB (302K from 171K), DHI (205K from 77K), CRS (220K from 127K)
  • Maintained: VRNA (1 mln shares), TSM (0.77 mln)
  • Exited: WBD (from 6.5 mln shares), ENTG (1.65 mln), BCS (1.55 mln), CZR (1.4 mln), COHR (1.16 mln), KMI (1.1 mln), CCC (1.0 mln)
  • Decreased: NU (1.45 mln shares from 3.42 mln shares), DAKT (1.44 mln from 3.08 mln), U (0.88 mln from 1.77 mln), YPF (115K from 704K), CHYM (43K from 467K), EQT (895K from 1253K), FLUT (115K from 405K), ROKU (822K from 1101K), WWD (633K from 849K), C (515K from 666K), STX (86K from 197K), SE (274K from 310K), ARGT (254K from 268K)

Reuters : Activist investor Irenic builds stake in Papa John's, sources say

Activist investor Irenic builds stake in Papa John's, sources say

  • Unclear what Irenic might want to push for
  • Size of hedge fund's stake not known
  • Irenic appears at time of uncertainty for Papa John's

NEW YORK, Nov 14 (Reuters) - Activist investor Irenic Capital Management built a stake in Papa John's (PZZA.O), opens new tab during the third quarter, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday, adding a fresh dimension to mounting speculation about the pizza chain's future.

Generally, when an activist hedge fund builds a new holding, it signals interest in forcing management to consider alternatives. But it was not immediately clear what changes, if any, Irenic will seek at Papa John's.

A representative for Irenic declined to comment, while a representative for Papa John's did not respond to a request for comment. The size of Irenic's stake was not known.

The stake could be made public when Irenic makes its 13F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which requires fund managers to detail their ownership in publicly traded U.S. companies for a given three-month period.

Potential buyers have been circling the pizza chain for months but may have been frightened off as U.S. consumers are pulling back on spending at quick-serve restaurant chains like Papa John's.

Apollo Global (APO.N), opens new tab recently withdrew an offer to take the chain private at $64 a share, Reuters reported earlier this month, helping send the company's stock tumbling.

With no offer on the table, Papa John's CEO Todd Penegor told analysts on last week's quarterly earnings call that while the board would certainly look at all proposals, it was now moving ahead on executing its own strategy.

Industry analysts and investors said they supported Penegor's candid and pragmatic assessment, helping the stock price recover some.

Its shares seesawed this week after a website called ABC Money published a report on Monday saying there was a new bid for the company, driving its stock north. Its shares tumbled on Tuesday after other media outlets dismissed the story as a hoax. A source close to Papa John's confirmed that the report was false.

Some investors said Papa John's remains a desirable property but given new economic uncertainties, it might take time for potential bidders to come to an appropriate price.

Irenic was founded by former Elliott Investment Management executive Adam Katz and former Indaba Capital Management executive Andy Dodge and has been involved when companies like Arconic, Barnes and Couchbase went private and mounted activist engagements at News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab and Theravance Biopharma

Reuters : Activist investor Irenic builds stake in Papa John's, sources say

Activist investor Irenic builds stake in Papa John's, sources say

Unclear what Irenic might want to push for
Size of hedge fund's stake not known
Irenic appears at time of uncertainty for Papa John's

NEW YORK, Nov 14 (Reuters) - Activist investor Irenic Capital Management built a stake in Papa John's (PZZA.O), opens new tab during the third quarter, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday, adding a fresh dimension to mounting speculation about the pizza chain's future.

Generally, when an activist hedge fund builds a new holding, it signals interest in forcing management to consider alternatives. But it was not immediately clear what changes, if any, Irenic will seek at Papa John's.

A representative for Irenic declined to comment, while a representative for Papa John's did not respond to a request for comment. The size of Irenic's stake was not known.

The stake could be made public when Irenic makes its 13F filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which requires fund managers to detail their ownership in publicly traded U.S. companies for a given three-month period.

Potential buyers have been circling the pizza chain for months but may have been frightened off as U.S. consumers are pulling back on spending at quick-serve restaurant chains like Papa John's.

Apollo Global (APO.N), opens new tab recently withdrew an offer to take the chain private at $64 a share, Reuters reported earlier this month, helping send the company's stock tumbling.

With no offer on the table, Papa John's CEO Todd Penegor told analysts on last week's quarterly earnings call that while the board would certainly look at all proposals, it was now moving ahead on executing its own strategy.

Industry analysts and investors said they supported Penegor's candid and pragmatic assessment, helping the stock price recover some.

Its shares seesawed this week after a website called ABC Money published a report on Monday saying there was a new bid for the company, driving its stock north. Its shares tumbled on Tuesday after other media outlets dismissed the story as a hoax. A source close to Papa John's confirmed that the report was false.

Some investors said Papa John's remains a desirable property but given new economic uncertainties, it might take time for potential bidders to come to an appropriate price.

Irenic was founded by former Elliott Investment Management executive Adam Katz and former Indaba Capital Management executive Andy Dodge and has been involved when companies like Arconic, Barnes and Couchbase went private and mounted activist engagements at News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab and Theravance Biopharma

>>> Scopia Capital discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New NVRI

Scopia Capital discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New NVRI BRZE AZTA positions
Highlights from Q3 2025 filing as compared to Q2 2025 (all amounts are approximate):
  • New: NVRI (953K), BRZE (689K), AZTA (488K), BALL (436K), TRU (262K), KVYO (248K), KKR (234K), CAE (198K), ELV (38K),
  • Increased: VVV (993K from 516K), ENS (371K from 239K), BATRK (300K from 187K)
  • Exited: INDV (1655K), MAGN (1011K), MRCY (447K), AL (208K), TSM (122K), LESL (98K), BIO (95K), TPICQ (66K), MDB (57K), HUM (21K)
  • Decreased: PTON (2.4 mln from 4.4 mln), KBR (444K from 1.2 mln), SGI (204K from 734K), CC (2886K from 3355K), HLIT (2563K from 3032K), CTVA (622K from 850K), SN (405K from 558K), PRMB (979K from 1111K), JBHT (106K from 235K), VSTS (2785K from 2897K)

>>> Impactive Capital (Lauren Taylor Wolfe and Christian Alejandro Asma) disclo

Impactive Capital (Lauren Taylor Wolfe and Christian Alejandro Asma) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New IWM position, Exited WDC
Highlights from Q3 2025 filing as compared to Q2 2025 (all amounts are approximate):
  • New: IWM (0.61 mln shares)
  • Maintained: CLVT (43.03 mln shares), CNXC (4.38 mln), VAC (4.05 mln), WMS (1.66 mln), ABG (1.25 mln)
  • Exited: WDC (3.57 mln shares)
  • Decreased: SLM (7.23 mln shares from 8.03 mln shares), ETSY (3.24 mln from 3.55 mln), WEX (2.2 mln from 2.4 mln)

>>> Corvex Management (Keith Meister) discloses updated portfolio positions in 1

Corvex Management (Keith Meister) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New CX DIS CCL positions
Highlights from Q3 2025 filing as compared to Q2 2025 (all amounts are approximate):
  • New: CX (8.6 mln shares), DIS (1.31 mln), CCL (1.29 mln), UNP (678K), CRM (15K)
  • Increased: QSR (2.41 mln shares from 0.87 mln shares), IAC (2.79 mln from 2 mln), AMZN (0.98 mln from 0.68 mln), ORCL (0.35 mln from 0.1 mln)
  • Maintained: VSTS (18.8 mln shares), AQN (6.18 mln), SWX (5.03 mln), FTRE (4.51 mln), MDU (4.18 mln), ILMN (3.83 mln), WGS (3.06 mln), LLYVA (1.01 mln), HSII (1 mln),
  • Exited: IAS (from 2.62 mln shares), CSX (1.75 mln), SRE (1.06 mln), NSC (0.3 mln), GOOGL (0.23 mln), LNG (0.06 mln), IWM (0.01 mln)
  • Decreased: DLTR (0.54 mln shares from 0.98 mln shares), MGM (5.39 mln from 5.63 mln)