>>> US After Hours Summary: PSMT +7.1%, LEVI +5.6% higher on earnings; BYD to se

After Hours Summary: PSMT +7.1%, LEVI +5.6% higher on earnings; BYD to sell 5% equity interest in FanDuel to FLUT

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: PSMT +7.1% (also evaluating Chile as a potential new market), LEVI +5.6% (also increases dividend), SAND +0.3%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: RCAT +15% (drone stocks higher on Fox news report that Defense Sec Hegseth has issued orders to fast-track drone production), VOR +3.5% (names new CFO), AVAV +3.5% (drone stocks higher on Fox news report that Defense Sec Hegseth has issued orders to fast-track drone production), ADC +1.7% (increases dividend), APAM +0.9% (reports June AUM), LUCK +0.8% (acquires real estate underlying 58 locations), AIOT +0.2% (launches AI risk intervention application), FTK +0.2% (files for $200 mln mixed securities shelf offering; also files for 6.25 mln share offering by selling shareholder), R +0.2% (increases dividend), MRK +0.1% (FDA approves BRAVECTO QUANTUM from Merck animal health), LMT +0.1% (awarded a $197.5 mln modification to a previously awarded US Navy contract)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: FEIM -6%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: CIVB -9.8% (to acquire The Farmers Savings Bank; launches stock offering), BG -6.2% (stock offering by selling shareholders), TKNO -2.5% (files for $225 mln mixed securities shelf offering), AB -2.4% (reports June AUM), HBM -2.2% (temporarily suspends operations in Snow Lake due to wildfire), IVZ -1.2% (reports June AUM), TOL -0.1% (names new CFO), AGM -0.1% (Farmer Mac announces departure of CFO)

The Information : Why New U.S. Crypto Rules Will Reverberate Globally

Why New U.S. Crypto Rules Will Reverberate Globally
Stablecoin legislation set to pass next week will boost the use of crypto payments as well as the influence of the dollar.

The Takeaway
• New rules are expected to boost confidence in stablecoins
• Dollar-backed cryptocurrencies are already growing fast in countries with volatile currencies
• Stablecoins pegged to dollars will boost influence of U.S. currency globally

The most important cryptocurrency bill in history could become law next week, but its immediate effect on everyday Americans will be negligible. Instead, the biggest impact will occur overseas, where it will boost both crypto and the dollar in the global economy.

The law will bolster confidence in stablecoins, cryptocurrencies pegged to a traditional asset, generally the U.S. dollar. Individuals and businesses across the world—from Argentina to Turkey—have embraced stablecoins to deal with volatile currencies, avoid capital controls and make payments.

The rise of stablecoins, such as Tether’s USDT, the dominant token, and Circle’s USDC, pose risks to national financial systems because they bypass banks, are hard for regulators to control and increase the role of the dollar in overseas economies. Drug dealers and money launderers also use stablecoins to move cash, making it harder for governments to fight illicit activities.

“When the Trump government came into power, it gave legitimacy to stablecoins,” said Ife Johnson, co-founder and CEO of Juicyway, a Nigerian payments startup. Stablecoins have grown rapidly in countries with volatile currencies such as Nigeria; they give people easy access to dollars.

In Argentina, a nation that has suffered nearly every kind of financial crisis, stablecoins are increasingly popular. Micaela Scapino, a 24-year-old software engineer who lives in Cordoba, Argentina’s second-largest city, said she now keeps almost all of her savings in stablecoins.

“I feel really comfortable and safe having my money in currencies like this…not being worried about if my pesos are worth less this month,” Scapino said in a video chat from her home, a duplex with a backyard that she shares with her boyfriend. She now keeps little in her traditional bank account. “Less than 10,000 pesos,” she said.

She works remotely for a Chilean fintech company and is paid in stablecoins through Deel, a payroll startup that specializes in remote workers. She nearly tripled her salary when she took the job last year, in part because she’s effectively getting paid in dollars.

To pay rent for their three-bedroom house, she converts her stablecoins at the beginning of each month into 1.2 million pesos (about $950) using Belo, a local crypto app. Over the last weekend, she paid for two bottles of Coca-Cola and a bag of ice at a supermarket by scanning a QR code with the app, which instantly converted her Tether stablecoins into 12,400 pesos (roughly $10).

Stablecoin providers typically back the cryptocurrencies with short-term Treasurys and other safe, liquid dollar-based assets, linking them to the U.S. currency. One pitch for the bill in Congress is that it will increase demand for Treasurys at a time when the U.S. needs to sell a lot more of them to fund rising budget deficits.

“It’s a win-win-win for everyone involved: the private sector, the Treasury, consumers,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a post on X last month, urging the passage of stablecoin legislation.

The bill is likely to be approved by the House next week, which it has dubbed Crypto Week in support of President Donald Trump’s pro-crypto policies. The measure has had bipartisan support in both chambers, in part because the crypto industry has become a big election donor, backing friendly candidates and attacking unfriendly ones.

Pinn Lawjindakul, a Lightspeed Venture Partners investor who focuses on Southeast Asia, said the U.S.’s pro-crypto pivot has boosted consumer confidence in stablecoins and spurred startups into the market. “There’s a huge pent-up need for U.S. dollars in emerging economies that constantly see their currency devalue,” she said. “There’s way stronger trust now in stablecoin technology.”

She is tracking stablecoin adoption in countries like Malaysia, the Philippines and Indonesia, which have had volatile currencies and have a large base of remote employees who often work for U.S. companies.

Consumers and businesses in emerging markets like these have long wanted to hold assets in dollars but have struggled with domestic regulations and difficulty getting the U.S. currency. Stablecoins avoid those problems. However, the shift to dollar-backed stablecoins could pose a threat to the weakest currencies and the financial systems of those countries.

“It’s more efficient to dollarize with stablecoins as opposed to physical cash,” said Nic Carter, founding partner at crypto venture firm Castle Island Ventures, who invests in stablecoin-related startups. “As we look forward to the next 10 years…I think you will see it happen at scale, and it will topple certain sovereign currencies.”

Bank for International Settlements, a Switzerland-based organization owned by the world’s central banks, has warned that stablecoins without regulation could pose a risk to financial stability and monetary sovereignty. Countries could face potentially destabilizing capital flows via stablecoins while also being tightly linked to the dollar’s performance, which is largely driven by the U.S. economy. The dollar is down about 10% this year against a basket of currencies, one of its worst years in decades.

Tether is by far the biggest winner in the global shift to stablecoins. It has about a 90% market share by volume in real-world payments, according to data from Artemis, a crypto analytics firm. Stablecoin payments volume globally jumped to $51 billion in 2024—a rise of over 75% in a year—and is on track to reach more than $72 billion this year, according to Artemis.

Tether’s Ambitious Plans

Stablecoins companies can throw off big profits. Last year, Tether, which has $159 billion in stablecoins outstanding, earned more than $13 billion in profits with little more than 100 employees. Companies like Tether make their money from interest earned on the assets that back their tokens. Unlike bank accounts or money market funds, stablecoins typically don’t pay interest to their holders.

At a private event Tether hosted in May for clients and partners at the JW Marriott Marquis Hotel in Dubai, CEO Paolo Ardoino outlined the company’s ambitious expansion plans. He listed 22 use cases for its stablecoin, including saving in dollars; fast, cheap remittances; hedging against inflation; and microloans.

For Tether, the push to diversify beyond crypto trading is critical: Its USDT stablecoins could be de-listed by exchanges in the U.S. if it can’t comply with auditing and reserve requirements under the new stablecoin legislation. Tether has said it plans to launch a separate stablecoin for the U.S. market, while growing USDT usage in the rest of the world.

Tether is using its vast profit to build up a portfolio of companies. It sees commodity trading—which often involves paying for multimillion-dollar cargoes of oil, metals and food to sellers in emerging markets—as the next leg of growth for its stablecoin. Commodities are typically priced in dollars. In March, Tether bought a majority stake in the New York Stock Exchange–listed agricultural giant Adecoagro, one of the biggest land owners in Argentina. That could lay the groundwork for Tether to get into providing financing and stablecoin payments in commodity trading.

But Tether has also been under criticism because drug dealers and terrorist organizations have used its stablecoin to move money. The company estimates it has more than 400 million users across the world, but for most of them it doesn’t verify identity since they don’t interact directly with it, instead buying the tokens on exchanges or from brokers. Tether says it collaborates with law enforcement agencies to freeze assets when needed.

Nigeria’s Juicyway has ridden the stablecoin boom, growing deposits to $64 million in June from $6 million a year earlier. It acts as an exchange, mostly for businesses needing dollars or naira, the Nigerian currency. It uses stablecoins to settle most of these transactions, a service provided by Stripe-owned Bridge, which helps companies convert dollars into stablecoins in order to transfer money faster than international bank wires.

Companies in markets like these are trying to influence regulations. Yellow Card, the largest stablecoin payment company in Africa, is providing input for a bill in Kenya, said CEO Chris Maurice.

“People are using this technology, and it’s not something that you can stop,” he said. “That’s one important thing for regulators to remember.”

FT : Heat deaths in England could rise 50-fold in next half-century, study warns

Heat deaths in England could rise 50-fold in next half-century, study warns
Cooler homes and cities are needed to mitigate the dangers of rising temperatures, say researchers

Heat-related deaths in England and Wales would rise 50-fold over the next half-century if climate change is severe and adaptations are minimal, according to research that lays bare the need to prepare for higher temperatures. 

Fatalities would climb six-fold under even the most optimistic scenario as the planet warms and an ageing population becomes more vulnerable, says the study published in the journal PLoS on Thursday.  

Back-to-back heatwaves this summer have underscored how initiatives from urban planning to the building and upgrading of homes have historically paid little heed to the threat of ever hotter summers. 

“Our research shows how increases in heat-related deaths are not just a consequence of rising temperatures — they’re also driven by how we build our cities, care for vulnerable populations and address social inequality,” said Rebecca Cole of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and lead author of the paper.

“Concerted adaptation strategies are required, well in excess of those over the last 30 years,” she added.

The researchers forecast the impact of 15 different scenarios. They adjusted for demographics, regional climate variations, potential power outages, and different levels of warming and adaptation including shutters and active cooling systems.

The current baseline of 634 annual heat-related deaths would soar to 10,317 in the 2050s and 34,027 in the 2070s, under a worst-case scenario. That would include 4.3C of warming above pre-industrial temperatures by the end of the century. The world is currently on course to reach 2.9C of warming by 2100 even with existing government pledges to tackle climate change. 

The most optimistic scenario, including 1.6C of warming, would still drive deaths up to 3,007 a year in the 2050s and 4,592 in the 2070s, the study found.

The projections highlight how the balance of danger from heat and cold is likely to shift across Europe as the climate changes. Spring 2025 was the sunniest and warmest on record in Britain, while last month ranked as the hottest June on record in England.


British homes have generally been built and modified to protect against extreme cold, which is estimated to cause thousands of deaths each year. In the UK, millions of properties are built of brick, which absorbs heat slowly but retains it for longer than other materials.  

“UK homes have traditionally been designed to retain heat, and government retrofit schemes necessarily focus on energy efficiency and insulation,” Cole said.

Construction rules that came into force in 2022 require new residential buildings to be built to mitigate the risk of overheating. Housing association tenants can speak to their council if excess heat means that their property is in a dangerous condition, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said. 

Another issue is a lack of state subsidies for one of the main types of heat pumps that can be used for cooling buildings, as well as heating.

Johann Beckford, senior policy adviser at the Green Alliance think-tank, said the government should extend its support to air-to-air heat pumps, which it looked at in a recent consultation.

“These heat pumps that can cut our emissions and make our homes more comfortable during high heat events,” he said.

A separate, rapid study published this week found that there were an estimated 2,300 heat-related deaths in Europe between June 23 and July 2, including 263 in London alone. 

The research warned that relatively small increases in temperatures during hot spells can trigger big surges in deaths. Many fatalities occurred in homes and hospital settings among already vulnerable people, particularly the elderly, and are often not reported, the study said. 

Many deaths are caused by strain on the cardiovascular system, rather than heat directly, said Portsmouth university’s Mike Tipton, an expert on the effects of weather conditions. This is because the human body attempts to “offload heat” by increasing blood flow to the skin and decreasing it to soft internal organs. 

People with cardiovascular problems or who are chronically dehydrated could experience dizziness or feel light-headed, he said. “They might faint or fall. They’re more likely to form clots.”

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: “We know that keeping homes cool in hot weather is just as important as heating them in the winter.

“That’s why we have consulted on including air-to-air heat pumps under the Boiler Upgrade Scheme, and our response will be published in due course.”

FT : Saylor’s latest strategy for Strategy: selling new shares to pay dividends

Saylor’s latest strategy for Strategy: selling new shares to pay dividends
Isn’t there a word for that?

Michael Saylor’s company Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, doesn’t just believe in bitcoin — it has staked its entire future on it. Since pivoting from enterprise software to crypto back in August 2020, it has transformed into a bitcoin investment vehicle, with its shares surging more than 25-fold. But beneath the euphoria lies a capital structure that’s becoming increasingly self-referential.

Strategy’s approach to financing has had three key elements. First, it has issued ever larger amounts of common stock to raise money for buying bitcoin, taking advantage of its shares trading at roughly twice the company’s net asset value (NAV). 

Second, it has issued huge sums of convertible bonds, exploiting the high volatility of its own shares to secure phenomenally favourable terms. Initially these convertibles were secured against its bitcoin holdings, but today the outstanding bonds are unsecured, removing the risk of margin calls. If the share price fails to rise enough for the bonds to convert, the company still has to repay the money, but maturities have been pushed out, giving Strategy breathing room (at least until the first investor put in September 2027) even if bitcoin prices drop sharply. 

Third, it has issued three classes of perpetual preferred shares — Strike (STRK), Strife (STRF) and Stride (STRD) — with high, discretionary dividends, some of which can be paid in kind.

The logic was simple: raise as much money as possible to buy bitcoin. Strategy is now by far the largest corporate holder of bitcoin anywhere. Yet its latest move may mark a shift.

Earlier this week, Strategy announced a $4.2bn at-the-market offering of Stride. On the surface, it looks like yet another bid to raise cash for more bitcoin purchases. But tucked away in the announcement was a telling clause: proceeds may also be used to pay dividends on other classes of preferred shares, namely Strife and Strike (Alphaville emphasis added):

Strategy intends to use the net proceeds from the ATM Program for general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of bitcoin and for working capital, and may also use the net proceeds for the payment of dividends to holders of its 10.00% Series A Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share and 8.00% Series A Perpetual Strike Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

This isn’t a refinancing, where a company swaps expensive capital for cheaper funding. Nor is it a typical dividend recapitalisation, where a company borrows to pay shareholders dividends. A dividend recap usually assumes the business generates enough cash to support more debt. Strategy’s legacy software division doesn’t produce enough free cash flow to cover these preferred dividends, and bitcoin, of course, pays no income.

Instead, this manoeuvre is something different. Strategy is effectively reserving the right to use money from new securities to prop up old ones, reassuring investors that it can keep issuing fresh paper to cover dividend payments. This in turn is meant to give them confidence to buy the future rounds of preferred shares.

The whole structure rests on two pillars. First, Strategy’s market capitalisation consistently trades above the value of its bitcoin holdings — a rare occurrence in what’s supposed to be an efficient market. The best explanation for the NAV premium is that Saylor commands a loyal following and his bitcoin strategy has a powerful narrative momentum. Second, Strategy must maintain perpetual access to capital markets. It needs to keep finding new buyers for its paper, whether common stock, convertible bonds, or preferred shares. 

Dependence on these two factors carries obvious risks. The company has no hedge, no diversified income, and no plan B. Its fate hinges on the assumption that capital will always be available and bitcoin’s price will either rise or, at the very least, stay elevated. A prolonged downturn or shut-off from funding could force the unthinkable: selling bitcoin to meet dividend payments. This would represent an existential crisis for a “buy and HODL” maximalist.

For now, the music plays on. Bitcoin’s rally boosts both Strategy’s NAV and the stock’s premium to NAV, and investors continue to clamour for Saylor’s paper. But each new layer of financial engineering makes the structure shakier. Strategy has proven its approach pays off in a bull market. The question is whether it can withstand the storm when the tide inevitably turns.

FT : Trading firms Virtu and Citadel Securities clash over new options exchange

Trading firms Virtu and Citadel Securities clash over new options exchange
Virtu lends its support to IEX after Ken Griffin’s firm criticised planned exchange’s ability to cancel and reprice trades

Virtu Financial has come out against rival Citadel Securities’ attempts to block the opening of a new US options exchange, as the high-speed trading giant wades into a dispute over market structure that has sucked in some of Wall Street’s biggest names.

The disagreement hinges on the implementation of a 350-microsecond so-called “speed bump” that US exchange operator IEX — made famous by the Michael Lewis’s bestseller Flash Boys — hopes will protect traders on its proposed exchange from buying and selling options at stale prices.

This mechanism will allow IEX to cancel and reprice a small proportion of orders, but critics of the plan, including billionaire Ken Griffin’s Citadel Securities, say it would end up harming ordinary investors while enriching IEX’s shareholders and market makers.

New York-headquartered Virtu on Wednesday wrote to the Securities and Exchange Commission in support of IEX, which says it wants to shield investors from the cost of latency arbitrage — the exploitation by high-frequency traders of the microseconds it takes prices to reflect broader market moves.

Virtu’s intervention comes three weeks after Citadel Securities criticised what it described as IEX’s “nefarious” and “unlawful” plan “to introduce an unprecedented quote cancelling scheme” into the ballooning US options market, in a letter to the SEC.

Retail broker Charles Schwab, the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have also said that IEX’s plan to launch a new equity options exchange should not be approved. 

But in its letter, Virtu said IEX’s proposal “represents a well-intentioned effort to advance” market transparency and improve “the investor experience”. 

It added: “The introduction of new trading venues has the potential to promote competition, foster innovation and possibly deliver better trading outcomes for all market participants.” Virtu was co-founded by Doug Cifu and Vincent Viola, former chair of the New York Mercantile Exchange and the owner of ice hockey team the Florida Panthers.

Citadel Securities and IEX have clashed before. In 2015, Citadel Securities sought to block IEX’s application for registration as a national securities exchange, writing at the time that a new entrant would “create confusion for the marketplace, and for retail investors in particular”. 

Citadel’s attempt was ultimately unsuccessful, although 11 years later IEX remains a small player in US equities, with a market share of roughly 2.6 per cent, according to the firm.

Citadel’s latest attempt to shut down IEX’s planned move into the options market has drawn the ire of pressure group We The Investors, which wrote to the SEC on the subject earlier this month.

“Almost 10 years since the first comment letters were filed against the IEX Equities exchange application, and all we have are the same tired, recycled arguments,” said WTI chief technology office Dave Lauer in the letter.

“It has become clear that despite critics’ attempts to rewrite history and pretend that there is no such thing as latency arbitrage, such arbitrage does exist, and exploits both geographical and technological latencies in order to earn profits for the fastest traders to the detriment of slower traders,” he added.

John Ramsay, chief market policy officer at IEX, said: “For the people who complain that the quotes will be inaccessible, it’s worth asking inaccessible to whom and for what purpose. If the answer is they’ll be inaccessible to people who are using latency arbitrage, that is exactly the point.”