WsJ : Fed Rate Rise Could Come ‘Relatively Soon’ as Data Point to Stronger Econo

Fed Rate Rise Could Come ‘Relatively Soon’ as Data Point to Stronger Economy
Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen testified to Congress amid some of the best government data in decades on housing, jobless claims and inflation
President-elect Donald Trump is preparing to take office amid signs the U.S. economy is growing stronger as the year ends and the Federal Reserve is nearing its next increase in short-term interest rates.

Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen on Thursday said a rate increase could come “relatively soon,” and her remarks were followed by some of the best government data in decades on housing, jobless claims and inflation. The news bolstered expectations the Fed will lift its benchmark short-term rate at its next policy meeting on Dec. 13-14.

“The economy has made further progress this year” toward the Fed’s employment and inflation goals, Ms. Yellen said in testimony before Congress’s Joint Economic Committee.

The Fed chief said the results of the U.S. presidential election hadn’t changed officials’ view following their last policy meeting that the case for a rate increase had strengthened.

“To my mind, the evidence we’ve seen since that time remains consistent with the judgment the [Fed’s policy] committee reached in November,” she said, noting that incoming data supports their expectations for strengthening economic growth, an improving labor market and rising inflation.
U.S. housing starts and permits for new construction both rose in October, a sign residential construction is ramping up to meet steady demand. Housing starts rose 25.5% last month, the best gain in more than three decades, while permits increased 0.3%, the Commerce Department said.

The number of Americans filing for unemployment claims fell last week to the lowest level since November 1973, the Labor Department said. A measure of the number of people on unemployment rolls fell below 2 million for the first time since 2000.

Meanwhile, U.S. consumer prices increased in October from a year earlier at the fastest rate in two years, the latest sign inflation pressures in the economy are firming. The consumer-price index advanced a seasonally adjusted 0.4% from a month earlier, the Labor Department said. Excluding the volatile costs of food and energy, so-called core prices rose 0.1%.

“U.S. economic growth appears to have picked up from its subdued pace earlier this year,” Ms. Yellen said shortly before the data were released.

Ms. Yellen quashed speculation that she may step down next year following the election of Mr. Trump, who called the chairwoman “highly political” earlier this year and accused her of keeping interest rates low to try to help Democrats. Ms. Yellen has refuted such accusations.

Asked about the possibility she may leave before her four-year term as chairwoman ends on Jan. 31, 2018, Ms. Yellen said: “It is fully my intention to serve out that term.”

Lawmakers also pressed Ms. Yellen to weigh in on what Mr. Trump’s proposed fiscal policies, including infrastructure spending and new tax cuts, mean for the economy and interest rates.

Ms. Yellen said that “when there is greater clarity” about what those policies will entail, the Fed policy committee will have to factor in the effect of those plans on unemployment, growth and inflation, and adjust their outlook accordingly.

She acknowledged there have been significant market moves following the election, which she said appear to be investors anticipating that a fiscal spending package could boost inflation and lead to the Fed raising rates faster. But she cautioned that there will be a great deal of uncertainty around those plans “for some considerable time.”

“Things could turn out very differently, we understand, and we will simply watch what decisions are made and factor them into our thinking going forward,” she said.

Asked whether the possibility of fiscal stimulus next year could warrant a delay in raising rates, possibly until January, Ms. Yellen said: “I would think that the judgment the committee reached in November remains the appropriate one.”

Fed officials decided to hold off on raising interest rates at their meeting earlier this month after judging that there was “somewhat more room” for the labor market to improve than they had expected at the beginning of the year, Ms. Yellen said. The central bank still sees “scope for some further improvement,” she said.

Since their last meeting, Fed officials have also seen several other pieces of reassuring data: wages grew 2.8% in October, the fastest annual pace since June 2009, and employers continued to add jobs at a steady clip. Americans boosted their spending at retail stores in October, and September sales were higher than previously estimated, marking the strongest two-month stretch of sales in at least two years.

“Absent significant negative economic news over the next month, the market’s assessment of the likelihood of [a rate increase] in December seems plausible,” Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said in Portland, Maine, on Tuesday.

Fed officials have left their benchmark federal-funds rate unchanged this year after raising it in December 2015 to a range between 0.25% and 0.50%. Traders in futures markets put the odds of a rate rise next month at 90.6% on Thursday morning before Ms. Yellen’s testimony was released, according to CME Group.

Officials held off on a rate increase in November in part because of worries about market volatility that could stem from the U.S. presidential election.

While Mr. Trump’s victory stunned many investors, stocks have largely reacted positively to the news and risen on speculation that a Trump administration could usher in new infrastructure spending and tax cuts. Bond prices, however, have fallen on expectations of higher inflation.

“A single policy rate increase, possibly in December, may be sufficient to move monetary policy to a neutral setting,” St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, a voting member of the Fed’s policy committee, said in London Wednesday. Mr. Bullard added that his outlook for the economy hasn’t changed since the Nov. 8 election.

Ms. Yellen warned that the Fed can’t hold rates too low for too long for fear it could encourage “excessive risk-taking and ultimately undermine financial stability.” If that were to happen, the central bank might have to raise rates more abruptly to prevent the economy from overheating, she said.

The decision to hold rates steady this month did “not reflect a lack of confidence in the economy,” she said. Rather, the Fed sees many encouraging signs.

Unemployment was at a low 4.9% last month. Average monthly job growth so far this year is still well above estimates of the pace necessary to absorb new entrants into the labor force, Ms. Yellen said. The share of adults in the labor force—holding or seeking jobs—has held steady this year, reflecting that the economy has had “more room to run” than officials had anticipated, she said.

Additional employment gains could help push the labor-force participation rate up further and help boost wages, she said. Ms. Yellen said she was troubled by persistent disparities in jobless rates for whites and African-American and Hispanic workers, as well as racial gaps in the median household income.

Ms. Yellen said she continues to expect the evolution of the economy will warrant only gradual increases in short-term rates over time, in part because the so-called neutral rate of interest—the rate at which the economy is operating at its full potential without overheating—appears to be quite low.

With the current fed-funds rate only slightly below the estimates of the neutral rate, monetary policy is likely just moderately stimulative, Ms. Yellen said. That means “the risk of falling behind the curve in the near future appears limited, and gradual increases in the federal-funds rate will likely be sufficient to get to a neutral policy stance over the next few years,” she said.

Ms. Yellen largely reiterated what officials said following their Nov. 1-2 meeting that they needed “some” further evidence that the economy is improving before raising rates again.

Some officials have continued to call for caution as the Fed weighs when to proceed with rate increases, arguing that there may still be room for the jobless rate to fall further without sparking inflation.

“We obviously don’t want to be pushing on the brakes harder than we need to in order to continue the trend of moderate growth,” Fed governor Daniel Tarullo said at The Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council event Tuesday

>>> US After Hours Summary: ANW +13%, NTAP +11% following earnings/gui


After Hours Summary: ANW +13%, NTAP +11% following earnings/guidance, HAIN +10% on audit committee finding no evidence of intentional wrongdoing... FSLR -12%, CSCO -5% following earnings/guidance

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: ANW +13.2%, NTAP +10.7%, GFF +2.9% (ticking higher - also increases quarterly dividend)

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: HAIN +9.8% (independent audit committee review was completed with no evidence of intentional wrongdoing; begun to implement a remediation plan to strengthen its internal controls and organization), PIP +3.4% (ticking higher; receives a final payment from SIGA Technologies of $83.9 million which fully satisfies the judgment owed to PharmAthene), TREE +2.1% (acquires CompareCards for up to $130 mln)

Shipping names extending recent gains in after hours: SINO +18.9%, DCIX +14.3%, GLBS +4%

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: FSLR -11.9% (raises 2016 EPS guidance; 2017 ERS, revenue, and shipment guidance below expectations), CSCO -4.7%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: VUZI -32.3% (Vuzix receives letter from Intel stating that it no longer desires to pursue a strategic relationship), LEI -25.5% (files prospectus supplement increasing prior S-3 offering of common stock on behalf of selling shareholders), ACRS -10.1% (announces a $65 mln underwritten public offering of common stock), STL -3.9% (offering 3.8 mln shares of common stock in a registered public offering), PLNT -3.8% (commences 15 mln common stock offering by selling stockholders), PFGC -3.7% (files for common stock shelf offering and announces secondary offering of 10 mln shares of common stock by certain stockholders, including affiliates of The Blackstone Group), TERP -1.3% (announces extensions until March 2017 to regain Nasdaq compliance; D. E. Shaw affirms 6.7% active stake, says is evaluating various potential transactions with one or both of the Issuer and SunEdison)

Solar names are trading lower following First Solar (FSLR) guidance/update: CSIQ -4.3%, SPWR -3.6%, TSL -3.3%, TAN -1.7%, JKS -1.1%

>>> US Close Dow -0.33% S&P -0.25% Nasdaq -0.14% Russell -0.18%


Closing Market Summary: Stocks Finish Little Changed Amid Profit Taking

The major averages ended the midweek affair on a mixed note as investors continued to fine-tune their post-election positioning. The Nasdaq Composite (+0.4%) finished ahead of the S&P 500 (-0.2%) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.3%). The three indices are now up between 2.0% and 4.0% in November.

Equity indices diverged at the start of the session as profit-taking activity weighed on the post-election landscape. Investors continued to book profits on their reflationary trades, leading to pull backs in financials (-1.4%; month-to-date: +10.7%), industrials (-0.7%; month-to-date: +6.6%), and materials (-0.1%; month-to-date: +3.4%).

In addition, the top-weighted technology sector (+0.9%; month-to-date: -1.0%) rebounded after last week's underperformance, which occurred as investors left sector mainstays in favor of stocks better positioned for large-scale public works projects.

The S&P 500 (-0.2%) finished modestly lower with eight groups losing ground. The financial (-1.4%) sector rounded out the board while telecom services (+1.0%), technology (+0.9%), and consumer discretionary (+0.5%) outperformed.

Banking names continued to underperform in the financial sector (-1.4%) as Dow component JPMorgan Chase (JPM 77.40, -1.96) fell 2.5%. Banks rallied in the immediate aftermath of the election as a steepening yield curve boosted earnings prospects for the group. There has also been a fair amount of speculation regarding the Trump Administration reducing regulations for the industry. JPMorgan Chase remains up 11.8% so far this month.

The energy space (-0.9%) slid amid a downtick in crude oil futures. WTI crude fell 0.7% ($45.56/bbl; -$0.31) after the Department of Energy released a bearish inventory report. The EIA reported that crude oil inventories increased by 5.27 million barrels (consensus: +1.48 million) while gasoline stockpiles rose by 0.74 million barrels (consensus: -0.41 million). However, losses were held in check by some positive jawboning from Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak.

The Dow Jones Transportation Average (-0.7%) also saw some profit taking as rail names narrowed their recent gains. Union Pacific (UNP 98.01, -1.10) finished lower by 1.1%, narrowing its month-to-date gain to 11.2%. In the broader industrial sector (-0.7%), Lockheed Martin (LMT 263.35, -2.58, -1.0%) trimmed its November gain to 6.8%.

In the consumer discretionary space (+0.5%), shares of discount retailer Target (TGT 76.03, +4.59) rallied 6.4% after the company reported a bottom-line quarterly beat and issued better-than-expected comparable sales guidance for the fourth quarter. Separately, Dow component Disney (DIS 99.12, +1.41) rose 1.4% after being upgraded to "Buy" from "Hold" at Deutsche Bank.

The Treasury complex finished on a modestly higher note while the 30-yr bond outperformed, recovering early losses after a lukewarm inflation reading. The October Producer Price Index (PPI) came in flat while the index for final demand, less food and energy, fell 0.2%. The headline index is up 0.8% year-over-year while the core reading checks in at 1.2% year-over-year. Despite today's four-basis point decline, the 30-yr yield (2.92%) is up 34 basis points so far in November. For its part, the 10-yr yield ended unchanged at 2.22%.

Today's trading volume was below the average of 924 million as fewer than 869 million shares changed hands at the NYSE floor.

Today's economic data included the weekly MBA Mortgage Index, October PPI, October Industrial Production/Capacity Utilization, and the November NAHB Housing Market Index: 

  • The MBA Mortgage Index indicated that mortgage applications fell 9.2% in the week ending November 12. This followed a 1.2% decline in the prior week.
  • The Producer Price Index for October was unchanged (consensus +0.3%) while the index for final demand, less food and energy, was down 0.2% ( consensus +0.2%).
  • Industrial production was unchanged in October (consensus +0.2%) after declining a downwardly revised 0.2% (from +0.1%) in September.
    • The capacity utilization rate slipped to 75.3% (consensus 75.5%) from an unrevised 75.4% in September.
  • The NAHB Housing Market Index for November came in at 63 from an unrevised 63 in October. The consensus expected the reading to come in at 64.0.

Tomorrow's economic data will include the 8:30 ET release of CPI for October (consensus +0.4%), October Housing Starts (consensus 1178k) and Building Permits (consensus 1200k), weekly initial claims (consensus 257k), and the Philadelphia Fed Survey for November (consensus 7.0). On a separate note, Fed Chair Janet Yellen is scheduled to testify before the Joint Economic Committee tomorrow at 10:00 ET. This will be Chair Yellen's first opportunity to address monetary policy since the election.

  • Russell 2000: +14.6% YTD
  • Dow Jones: +8.3% YTD
  • S&P 500: +6.5% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite: +5.7% ytd

FT : Rio faces new questions about giant Guinea project



From: LAURENT CHEKROUN (MAKOR SECURITIES LO) At: 11/16/16 02:34:46
Subject: FT : Rio faces new questions about giant Guinea project
Rio faces new questions about giant Guinea project
Company lawyers found emails about $10.5bn payment to consultant more than a year ago

Rio Tinto’s lawyers uncovered more than a year ago internal emails about a questionable $10.5m payment to a consultant, but the mining company did not alert law enforcement authorities and investors about the matter until last week.

The Anglo-Australian group said on November 9 it had notified authorities after discovering emails from 2011 that referred to the payment to the consultant, who helped head off a threat to Rio’s claim to the giant Simandou iron ore project in Guinea.

In the emails, seen by the Financial Times, Alan Davies, the executive in charge of Simandou, discusses with Tom Albanese, then chief executive, and Sam Walsh, then head of iron ore, paying a $10.5m fee to François Polge de Combret, a former top French banker and classmate of Guinea’s president.

Following an internal inquiry begun in August, Rio said last week it had referred the matter to law enforcement authorities in the UK, the US and Australia. The company now faces years of scrutiny and the risk of large fines if it is found to have broken anti-corruption laws.

Rio has suspended Mr Davies, the only one of the three executives in the email chain still at the company. He has not responded to requests for comment.

Rio said last week it discovered the emails in August, after they were anonymously posted online.

But two people with knowledge of the matter told the FT that the emails had been uncovered last year by lawyers working for the company on a legal dispute about the Simandou project.

The law firm, Quinn Emanuel, declined to comment. It reported to the department of Debra Valentine, the Rio executive in charge of legal and regulatory matters.

Ms Valentine had been due to retire next May but stepped down early following last week’s revelations. She could not be reached for comment.

The dispute over Simandou dates back to 2008, when the Guinean dictator of the day stripped Rio of the rights to the northern half of the project and handed them to BSG Resources, the mining arm of Israeli diamond tycoon Beny Steinmetz’s family conglomerate. BSGR went on to agree a $2.5bn deal to bring in Vale of Brazil as its partner.

In 2011, Rio secured its claim to the remaining half of Simandou with a $700m payment to the then new government of President Alpha Condé — a deal which, the emails indicate, Mr de Combret helped to facilitate. The ex-Lazard banker declined to comment.

In 2014, an inquiry launched by the Condé government concluded that BSGR had won its rights to half of Simandou through a bribery scheme. The government cancelled those rights and has yet to reissue them.

Rio reacted in April 2014 by bringing a racketeering lawsuit in New York in which it claimed BSGR, Mr Steinmetz, Vale and others had conspired to steal its Simandou rights.

The case was thrown out on a technicality in November 2015 but not before the parties had embarked on discovery — the process whereby claimants and defendants exchange material ahead of a trial.

An October 2014 court filing by Vale’s lawyers specified the information it wanted Rio to hand over. One section demanded: “All Documents regarding or constituting communications between Rio Tinto and any Third Party relating to Rio Tinto’s rights to Simandou Blocks 1 and 2.”

This was a reference to the half of the deposit that had been taken from Rio and handed to BSGR.

The 2011 emails that triggered the internal inquiry by Rio in August appear to fall squarely within the scope of Vale’s request for disclosure.

For instance, Mr Davies writes in one of the emails that, thanks to Mr de Combret’s efforts, “there is also now a glimmer of possibility that we may be able to move ourselves into a useful position in relation to [blocks] 1 and 2”.

People with knowledge of the matter said Rio’s lawyers came across the emails as they compiled documents to be disclosed in the discovery process.

It is unclear whether, after Quinn Emanuel found the emails, Ms Valentine’s department took any action, or contacted Mr Walsh, who in January 2013 had succeeded Mr Albanese as chief executive.

The FT has been unable to obtain comment from Mr Walsh, who stepped down as Rio chief executive in July. Mr Albanese has declined to comment.

Following Rio’s disclosures last week, Guinea’s government said it “had no knowledge, at the time in 2011, that Mr Polge de Combret acted in any capacity on behalf of … Rio Tinto”.

It added that it had “received no specific allegation of corruption” but that it would “follow any development in the self-reporting procedures initiated by Rio Tinto closely and will conduct all investigations that may be necessary to assist the relevant authorities with their mission”.

Jean-Sébastien Jacques, Rio’s current chief executive, told staff this week that the company did not take “lightly” a decision to contact regulators about the $10.5m payment to Mr de Combret. He added the company was taking “this situation very seriously”.

BSGR has always maintained it did nothing wrong in Guinea and that it was the victim of a plot by the government and its allies to confiscate its rights illegally. The company has seized on recent allegations of bribery against the Condé government in a separate legal case as well as Rio’s disclosures last week to argue that it is being vindicated.

>>> Bayer - Completes placement of €4B mandatory convertible not

Bayer - Completes placement of €4B mandatory convertible notes with institutional investors
- The notes will be issued at par with a coupon of 5.625% per annum.
- The minimum conversion price has been set at €90.
- The maximum conversion price has been set at €108, representing a maximum conversion premium of 20%.
- The notes will mature on 22-Nov-19.
- BofA Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan are acting as Joint Global Coordinators and Joint Bookrunners.

FT: RWE and Eon find fortunes diverge

RWE and Eon find fortunes diverge

Hiving off ‘dirty’ gas and coal-fired power stations seems to have been a mistake


Three months ago, investors wanting exposure to Germany’s utilities had a choice of two leading companies. Now, after one of the biggest restructurings the German power industry has seen, they have four.

Both RWE and Eon have divided themselves in two, creating respectively the entities Innogy and Uniper, which listed within less than a month of each other on the Frankfurt stock exchange.

Suddenly, an industry that seemed to be in perpetual crisis has something to brag about. Shares in Innogy and Uniper have risen since their flotations.


For Stephan Lehrke, senior partner at Boston Consulting Group, the utilities “are now looking to the future” and can start thinking about growth options, as well as even mergers and acquisitions. “The risks are still there but they’re manageable now,” he says.

The restructuring has radically redrawn the German energy landscape by splitting it into two parts — ostensibly a “clean” one and a “dirty” one. RWE and Uniper have the old gas and coal-fired power stations that symbolise Germany’s fossil fuel past, while Eon and Innogy hold the clean, green businesses such as infrastructure and renewables. The original companies, Eon and RWE, are still operating the nuclear assets and are liable for any bills and future clean-up costs.

“We’re allowing investors the option to position themselves in one or the other risk class,” Johannes Teyssen, chief executive of Eon, said in an interview earlier this year.

The Innogy and Uniper listings come after a long period when their parent companies were seen as near-hopeless basket cases, as they staggered like wounded giants from the impact of Germany’s revolutionary embrace of renewables — the so-called Energiewende, “energy turning point”.

RWE and Eon found the power generated from their coal and gas-fired plants squeezed out of the market by heavily subsidised wind and solar energy.

The companies were also affected by a decline in the wholesale price of electricity and Germany’s decision, in the wake of the 2011 Fukushima disaster in Japan, to close all its nuclear power stations by 2022.


They face another hit. Last month the government confirmed an announcement that it made in April that Germany’s four nuclear energy companies — RWE and Eon along with Vattenfall and EnBW — should pay a combined €23.6bn into a state-controlled fund to cover the cost of storing Germany’s nuclear waste. This is €6.2bn more than the four had provisioned for.

The storage cost problem is make-or-break for RWE and Eon. Guido Hoymann, a utilities analyst at Bank Metzler, says the flotations of Innogy and Uniper pale into insignificance next to the nuclear issue. Reaching a mutually-acceptable solution on storage costs “is critical for the future of both companies”, he says, and “key to their survival”.

It is one of the reasons why, for Eon, the spin-off of Uniper has proved to be something of a false dawn. “Eon hoped that its shares would re-rate after the [Uniper] IPO,” says Roland Vetter, head of research at PraXis Partners, a utilities-focused investment fund. “But people have woken up to the fact that its balance sheet is stretched.”

The nuclear problem is one of the main factors in that.

Eon had more bad news last week when it announced a widening net loss of €9.3bn in the first nine months of the year, after booking an impairment charge of €6.1bn against Uniper. But Bernstein analyst Deepa Venkateswaran says the results were not all bad: Eon also announced that a potential capital raising to finance the additional cost of the nuclear clean-up would be capped at €1.3bn — analysts had expected it to be as high as €2bn — and said it had ruled out the option of a dilutive rights issue.

RWE owns 75 per cent of something worth €20bn, Eon owns 46 per cent of something worth €4bn
Roland Vetter
For RWE, on the other hand, the outlook has improved since Innogy’s flotation. The listing valued Innogy at €20bn, more than twice RWE’s current market capitalisation and five times more than the market value of Uniper. It raised €5bn, €2bn of which goes to Innogy and €3bn to RWE — a useful infusion of cash.

Meanwhile, RWE will retain 75 per cent of the new company. “Then, if it gets into financial trouble, or if it needs money to help it meet its nuclear liabilities, it can just sell more Innogy stakes,” says one industry consultant who follows the German utilities closely.

In the view of some analysts, RWE’s strategy of hiving off the green assets — rather than following the example of Eon and spinning off the conventional power stations — has proved to be the more sensible approach.

“RWE owns 75 per cent of something that is worth €20bn, while Eon owns 46 per cent of something that is worth €4bn,” says Mr Vetter.