>>> US Close Dow -0.42% S&P -0.36% Nasdaq -0.31% Russell -0.49%

Closing Market Summary: Dow Snaps Winning Streak as Indices Pull Back

The major averages ended the Thursday affair under moderate selling pressure, pulling back from their recent rally to new all-time highs. The heavyweight industrial group (-1.0%) paced the retreat as weaker-than-expected quarterly reports and guidance weighed on the sector. Additionally, a leg lower in oil futures and the weakness in the financial (-0.5%) and technology (-0.5%) groups added to the negative tone. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.4%) finished in-line with the S&P 500 (-0.4%) and behind the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%).

The major averages began the day on a flat note as investors weighed a plethora of earnings reports and recently-released economic data. The European Central Bank released its latest policy statement this morning, deciding to maintain its assets purchase program and its interest rate corridor. The decision was largely expected after the Bank of England stated earlier in the month that it was too early to assess the economic impact of the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union. However, ECB President Mario Draghi stated that the central bank is ready to act should the need arise.

Equity indices teetered near their flat lines into the late morning as leadership from heavily-weighted technology (-0.5%) and health care (+0.4%) kept the market afloat. However, the benchmark index ebbed lower through the afternoon as a persistent downturn in crude oil weighed on equities. The S&P 500 (-0.4%) violated technical support near the 2166 price level in the early afternoon, drifting to the 2160 area. The major averages inched off that level in the final hour as eight sectors finished in the red. Materials (-0.6%), energy (-0.9%), and industrials (-1.0%) underperformed while the remaining decliners finished with losses between 0.3% (consumer staples) and 0.5% (technology). Conversely, health care (+0.4%) and utilities (+0.6%) finished above their flat lines.

The Dow Jones Transportation Average (-1.3%) finished well behind the benchmark index as airlines lagged. The U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS 22.25, -0.79) fell 3.4% as disappointing results and guidance from Southwest Air (LUV 37.32, -4.71) weighed. The company stated that third-quarter revenue per available seat mile is expected to decline between 3.0% and 4.0% year-over year. Separately, Union Pacific (UNP 90.93, -3.19) underperformed among rail names after lowering its full-year volume estimates.

Defense names underperformed in the broader industrial sector (-1.0%) as Lockheed Martin (LMT 254.14, -2.53) and Raytheon (RTN 134.90, -3.28) fell by 1.0% and 2.4%, respectively. Today's loss extended Lockheed's post-earnings retreat to 0.8%. Elsewhere, General Electric (GE 32.59, -0.19) ticked lower by 0.6% ahead of tomorrow morning's earnings report. The broader sector has declined 0.9% this week, compared to a 0.2% gain in the benchmark index.

The high-beta chipmakers displayed relative weakness, evidenced by the 1.3% decline in the PHLX Semiconductor Index. In the group, Intel (INTC 34.27, -1.42) fell by 4.0% after disappointing investors with its top-line results. Conversely, iPhone supplier Qualcomm (QCOM 59.98, +4.16) rallied 7.5% after beating top- and bottom-line estimates for the quarter.

The heavyweight health care sector (+0.4%) outperformed amid relative strength in biotechnology. The sub-group traded higher in sympathy with Biogen (BIIB 282.45, +20.04) after the company reported top- and bottom-line beats for the quarter. Health care service plans also outperformed after Humana (HUM 171.53, +13.12) increased its outlook for the year. However, it is worth mentioning that the sub-group was under early selling pressure after the Department of Justice announced that it is seeking to block mergers between Anthem (ANTM 139.00, +3.53) & Cigna (CI 140.32, +7.21) and Aetna (AET 118.30, +1.81) & Humana.

The U.S. Dollar Index (96.94, -0.26) settled modestly lower as the euro and the yen gained ground against the greenback. The single currency ticked higher by 0.1% against the buck (1.1022) while the dollar/yen pair finished lower by 1.1% (105.76). The move in the yen was prompted by commentary out of Japan, which called into question the size and nature of potential easing measures.

The Treasury complex finished higher with yields slipping throughout the group. The yield on the 10-yr note settled lower by three basis points at 1.56%.

Today's trading volume was below the recent average as fewer than 803 million shares changed hands on the NYSE floor.

Today's economic data included weekly initial claims, July Philadelphia Fed Survey, FHFA Housing Price Index for May, Existing Home Sales for June, and June Leading Indicators:

  • Initial claims for the week ending July 16 were 253,000 (consensus 265,000), a decrease of 1,000 from the prior week.
    • The initial claims reading was the lowest it has been since mid-April, which belies the fact that initial claims are close to their lowest levels over the past 45 years.
    • This suggests employers are very comfortable with the size of their existing workforces even if they are not altogether comfortable increasing their headcount with new, full-time employees.
    • There were no special factors influencing the initial claims reading, which held below 300,000 for the 72nd straight week -- the longest streak since 1973!
    • The four-week moving average for initial claims fell to 257,750 from 259,000
  • Continuing claims for the week ending July 9 dropped to 2.128 million from 2.153 million in the prior week.
    • The four-week moving average for continuing claims dropped to 2.141 million, a decrease of 2,750 from the prior week.
  • The Philadelphia Fed Index produced a headline disappointment for July, falling to -2.9 (consensus 5.0) from 4.7 in June.
    • The indexes for new orders, shipments, and unfilled orders all moved back into an expansion mode.
    • New orders rose from -3.0 to 11.8; shipments increased from -2.1 to 6.3; and unfilled orders jumped from -12.6 to 1.9.
    • The current employment index remained in a state of contraction; however, the pace of contraction slowed noticeably, evidenced by a reading of -1.6 for July versus -10.9 for June.
    • Separately, there was an uptick in the diffusion index for future general business activity, which increased four points to 33.7, bringing it close to its five-year average of 35.9.
  • The FHFA Housing Price Index for May rose 0.2%, which followed an increase of 0.3% in April.
  • Existing home sales increased 1.1% in June to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.57 million (consensus 5.50 million). 
    • The most encouraging aspect of the June report was that first-time buyers accounted for 33% of home sales, which was up from 30% in May and marked the highest share since July 2012.
    • The high-price obstacle didn't go away in June, which produced a 4.8% increase in the median existing-home price for all housing types to $247,700.
    • That is the 52nd straight month of year-over-year gains and tops May's peak median sales price of $238,900.
    • Price support continues to be underpinned by limited supply and it doesn't sound as if there will be a meaningful break in the pricing trend on the near horizon.
    • To that end, unsold inventory is at a 4.6-month supply at the current sales pace versus 4.7 months in May.
    • Individual investors, who account for many cash sales, purchased only 11% of homes in June, which is the lowest since July 2009. Their reduced interest is likely a reflection of high-price constraints.
    • Single-family home sales increased 0.8% in June to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.92 million while existing condominium and co-op sales rose 3.2% to 650,000 units on the same basis.
    • On a regional basis, existing home sales declined 1.3% in the Northeast, increased 3.8% in the Midwest, remained unchanged in the South, and jumped 1.7% in the West.
    • Existing home sales in May were revised from 5.53 million to 5.51 million.
  • The Conference Board's Leading Economic Index for June increased 0.3%, which was right in-line with the consensus estimate and followed on the heels of an unrevised 0.2% decline for May.
    • Every component index contributed to the monthly increase, with the exception of the average workweek in manufacturing (-0.07 percentage points) and average consumer expectations for business conditions (unchanged).
    • The largest contributors to the Leading Economic Index for June were average weekly initial claims (0.15 percentage points) and the interest rate spread (0.14 percentage points).
    • The two components estimated by the Conference Board -- manufacturers' new orders for consumer goods and materials and nondefense capital goods orders excluding aircraft -- were tagged as contributing 0.02 percentage points and 0.03 percentage points, respectively.
    • Over the first half of the year, the Leading Economic Index increased 0.3% (about a 0.6% annual rate), which is roughly the same pace seen in the second half of 2015, according to the Conference Board.
    • Separately, the Coincident Economic Index increased 0.3% in June after being unchanged in May. The Lagging Index, meanwhile, decreased 0.1% on the heels of a 0.4% increase in May.

There is no economic data of note scheduled to be released tomorrow.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
: LUV -5.5%, SHW -5.2%, INTC -3.3%, VMI -3.1%, KMI -2.8%, DNKN-2.5%, UNP -2.3%, MLNX -2.2%, DISH -1.9%, AXP -1.3%, AXP -1.3%, DHI -1.2%, ADPT -0.8%, DOV -0.8%

M&A news: CTO -2% (concludes review of strategic alternatives, did not receive any expressions of interest; also reported earnings)

Select Airline related names showing weakness after weak earnings by peers: RYAAY -2.6%, UAL -2%, DAL -1.8%,JBLU -1.5%, HA -1.1%

Other news:
  • OPTT -14.4% (following another day of huge gains -- up more than 70% yesterday)
  • BKEP -10.4% (commences 3 mln unit offering of common units representing limited partner interests of the Partnership
  • OPGN -8.1% (pulling back following strength yesterday attributed to M&A speculation
  • BDC -7.2% (prices 4.5 mln depositary shares at $100.00 per share)
  • UBA -5.4% (commences 2.75 mln common stock offering)
  • CTO -2% (Consolidated-Tomoka Land announces Board has 'not received any expressions of interest in acquiring the Company that contained an indication of value that would provide a meaningful premium for shareholders')
  • TSLA -1.8% (Elon Musk unveils 'Master Plan pt2', says major component can't be done well with Tesla and SolarCity (SCTY) as different companies)
  • SPU -1.8% ( SkyPeople International Holdings discloses 57.5% active stake, confirms stock purchase agreement announced 7/18 )
  • LPI -1.3% (Laredo Petroleum expects to report a loss on derivatives of ~$68.5 million, including ~$45.0 million net cash received on settlements of matured derivatives, net of deferred premiums paid)
  • HAWK -0.9% (intends to offer $425 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2022 through a private placement; to enter into an amended and restated credit agreement for a $700 mln credit facility)
Analyst comments: GHL -1.9% (downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
: SPKE +9.5%, (expects Q2 adjusted EBITDA of $10.0 -12.0 mln - far exceeding co's expectations), FNF +8.6%, URI +8.3%, ASPS +7.7%, QCOM +7.6%, TBI +7.3%, CAMT +7.3%, ECA +6.6%, VAC+6.6%, GM +6.4%, BIIB +5.7%, EBAY +5.1%, (also announces $2.5 bln buyback), PHM +4.1%, DPZ +4.1%, NURO+3.4%, IMAX +3.1%, HXL +2.9%, HBHC +2.2%, PPG +2.2%, NEM +2%, ADS +1.4%, CCK +1.2%, DWCH +1%, (reports Q3 results, initiates process to explore and evaluate a broad range of strategic alternatives), PKG +1%, SNA +1%

M&A news:
  • RLYP +58.6% (to be acquired by Galenica for $32 per share)
  • JOY +17.4% (to be acquired by Komatsu (KMTUY) for $28.30 per share)
Select metals/mining stocks trading higher: MT +3.1%, RIO +3%, AU +2.8%, AUY +2.8%, DRD +2.7%, BHP +2.5%,BBL +2.4%, ABX +1.8%, FCX +1.8%, GDX +1.2%, X +1.1%

Other news:
  • KNDI +5.7% (announces that Kandi Electric Vehicles Group Co plans to sell 1,500 electric vehicles to two cities in China)
  • BLDP +5.3% (signs follow-on technology solutions agreement with leading global automotive OEM )
  • ARAY +5% (announces preliminary results from phase II trial evaluating once-daily accelerated partial breast irradiation in patients treated with the TomoTherapy System)
  • ADXS +4.2% (announces Fast Track designation from the FDA for its lead immunotherapy candidate)
  • LGIH +4.1% (LGI Homes will replace Krispy Kreme Doughnuts in the S&P SmallCap 600 July 27 after the close )
  • VALE +1.2% (reaches 86.8 Mt of iron ore production in the second quarter of 2016, 9.3 Mt higher than in 1Q16)
Analyst comments:
  • NOK +0.5% (added to Conviction Buy List at Goldman)
  • AMZN +0.5% (target raised to $900 from $790 at Goldman)

(TechCrunch) Tesla and Uber have more in common than you might think

Elon Musk’s new master plan catapults Tesla into a new market; car-sharing.
While the idea of Tesla car-sharing seems new, it is not the first time the company’s cars, coupled with autonomous technology, have come up in discussions about the sharing economy.
Back in 2015, Steve Jurvetson, a partner at Uber investor DFJ, told an audience that Uber’s Travis Kalanick had indicated he would buy every Tesla car produced if they could be made autonomous by 2020.
These were the days when it appeared a Uber and Tesla partnership could be on the horizon. Musk himself paused long enough on an earnings call to raise suspicions when discussing the possibility of such a partnership.
These days, it seems that Uber has gone its own way in developing an autonomous car solution. And with today’s announcement from Musk, it appears Tesla is doing the same.
“You will also be able to add your car to the Tesla shared fleet just by tapping a button on the Tesla phone app and have it generate income for you while you’re at work or on vacation, significantly offsetting and at times potentially exceeding the monthly loan or lease cost,” said Musk in his post.
Companies like Uber and Lyft have more in common with Tesla than would appear at first glance. Uber specifically has been quite vocal about its long-term vision and its need for autonomous vehicles.
Both Uber and Tesla used an initial product or service to enter a market with serious barriers to entry. For Uber, ride-sharing required serious human capital and powerful regulatory influence. Tesla needed to build a mass-produced automobile from scratch.
Uber is still burning cash in China and Tesla still needs to follow through on its costly Gigafactory, but for the most part, both companies have been successful in what they initially set out to do. Both companies have an expensive obsession with driverless cars. Uber is pushing to hire top talent from Carnegie Mellon and other top universities to develop and test autonomous technologies.
This puts Uber on a collision course with Tesla, but this is not new. Tesla is only completing the puzzle by using car-sharing as a means to boost vehicle utilization rates. Both companies are betting on autonomous driving to reduce transportation costs.

Uber needs costs low to open up transportation access to groups outside their current market. This means increasing availability in low-density regions, and ultimately convincing everyday Americans to ditch car-ownership. Tesla needs to decrease the cost of driving to increase access to electric vehicles and ultimately reduce electricity needs and the overall carbon footprint.
The greatest benefits of the sharing economy have yet to be seen. On the surface, companies like Uber are providing income to previously unemployed segments of the middle class. In the future, when car-sharing becomes automated, the greatest market efficiencies will come from reduced transportation costs. Kalanick himself has noted in the past that the most expensive part of an Uber ride is the driver. Ride-sharing can only replace car-ownership if prices decrease further.
Uber doesn’t need autonomous cars in the same way it needs market share in China, but the space provides long-term sustainability for the company. Similarly, Tesla could sustain itself on its current trajectory, but Tesla can achieve long-term relevancy with such an endeavor. For both companies, autonomous driving presents another high-growth opportunity that will continue to attract and retain top talent.
The key for both companies will be ensuring that their core-businesses are not neglected by means of future investment. Musk made it clear in his plan that opportunities exist in the near-term to develop public-transportation and cargo solutions that will ease the company towards its longer term goals.
The collision between the two companies is still far off. Just because Uber and Tesla are riding the same trend, the contest is not a zero-sum game. As Google and others increase spending on autonomous driving, the entire ecosystem benefits. Keeping an eye on R&D spending overall will be quite introspective into the strategies of all companies in the space.
Tesla can compete. Winning, on the other hand, is a matter of hedging the right bets on what the future of transportation will look like. 20 years from now, it’s unlikely we will have an interest in outright purchasing an electric car or paying a hefty fee to be driven around in a gas guzzler.
We have reached out to both Uber and Lyft for comment and will update this post if we receive word from them.

>>> Marriot Vacations beats by $0.06, misses on revs; reaffirms FY16 EPS guidanc

Marriot Vacations beats by $0.06, misses on revs; reaffirms FY16 EPS guidance (68.46)
  • Reports Q2 (Jun) earnings of $1.08 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.06 better than the Capital IQ Consensus of $1.02; revenues rose 1.7% year/year to $429.95 mln vs the $438.3 mln Capital IQ Consensus.
  • Co reaffirms guidance for FY16, sees EPS of $4.43-4.78, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $4.51 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate. Adjusted EPS increased from the previous guidance of $4.31 to $4.66 due entirely to a reduction in shares outstanding.
  • Co reaffirmed FY16 adjusted EBITDA guidance of $261-276 mln.
  • "Our second quarter results, including contract sales, were solid and in line with our expectations...And even more importantly, contract sales growth gained momentum as we moved through the second half of the quarter. Additionally, tour activations for the second half of 2016 are substantially ahead of this time last year, and four of our six new sales centers are open and gaining momentum, giving us confidence that we will achieve our 2016 goals and are well positioned for solid growth in the years to come."

NY Post : ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ was financed with stolen money: feds

‘Wolf of Wall Street’ was financed with stolen money: feds

“The Wolf of Wall Street” didn’t just tell the story of a crooked stockbroker who scammed millions of dollars that he blew on drugs and hookers — the Leonardo DiCaprio movie was itself financed with stolen money, the feds charged Wednesday.

A civil suit filed by the US Justice Department demands all future profits, royalties and distribution proceeds from the Oscar-nomi­nated 2013 flick on the grounds that it was part of an international money-laundering scheme involving a development firm set up by the prime minister of Malaysia.

“This is a case where life imitated art,” said US Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell.


In a series of interrelated complaints, the feds are seeking a total $1 billion in assets paid for with money allegedly stolen by corrupt Malaysian officials and their associates from 1Malaysia Development Berhad, also known as 1MDB.

The fund “was created to promote economic development . . . with the ultimate goal of improving the well-being of the Malaysian people,” but “unfortunately and tragically, a number of corrupt officials treated this public trust as a personal bank account,” US Attorney General Loretta Lynch said.

The assets include five swank Manhattan properties: penthouses in the Time Warner Center and Walker Tower, condos in the Park Laurel building and at 118 Greene St., and a stake in the Park Lane Hotel.

More than $100 million of the loot also allegedly went to produce “The Wolf of Wall Street,” which has raked in more than $392 million in ticket sales worldwide. It is director Martin Scor­sese’s highest-grossing film.

“Of course, neither 1MDB or the Malaysian people saw a penny of profit from that film or the other assets purchased with funds ­siphoned from 1MDB,” Caldwell said.

“Instead, that money went to relatives and associates of the corrupt officials of 1MDB and others.”

Caldwell said the suit targets only the movie’s future earnings because the feds aren’t “able to seize anything retroactively.”

“The Wolf of Wall Street” spent six years in development hell due to its salacious, R-rated subject matter before it was finally green-lighted by a virtually unknown production company, Red Granite Pictures, which footed almost all the costs, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The suit identifies infamous party animal Low Taek Jho — better known as “Jho Low” — as a key figure in the film’s funding, noting that he personally distributed more than $10 million for the project.

The Los Angeles federal court filing notes that Low got a full-screen “special thanks” in the closing credits and was among three people singled out as “collaborators” during DiCaprio’s acceptance speech when he won the 2014 Golden Globe Award for Best Actor in a Motion Picture.

DiCaprio also gave shoutouts to Riza Aziz, the stepson of Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak and a co-founder of Red Granite, and to Joey McFarland, Red Granite’s other co-founder.

The suit also alleges that DiCaprio — who is identified only as “a lead actor in ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ ” but can be identified through the complaint’s description — went gambling with Low, Aziz and McFarland at The Venetian Las Vegas on July 15, 2012. The foursome had more than $1.15 million in 1MDB funds with which to gamble. It was ­deposited into Low’s account.

The suit says Red Granite bankrolled “The Wolf of Wall Street” with 1MDB funds funneled into a Swiss bank account held in the name of Good Star Limited.

Cash was then transferred into various accounts at City National Bank in Los Angeles and doled out to pay the film’s production costs.

“These funds are directly traceable to the $700 million wire transfer and $330 million wire transfers unlawfully diverted from 1MDB to the Good Star account,” the suit says.

Specific payments included 17 separate transfers, totaling $3.9 million, to the Scorsese-owned Sikelia Productions company, $48 million to an unidentified film-industry management firm and at least $4.1 million to various visual-effects companies.

About $2.5 million went to the Screen Actors Guild, and another $80,000 was paid to a charter-yacht company, the suit says.

One of the most memorable scenes in “The Wolf of Wall Street” features DiCaprio — portraying real-life stock fraudster Jordan Belfort — being questioned by FBI agents aboard a yacht docked off Battery Park City.

Sources told The Post that Low “lavished money” on DiCaprio. “He would give him half a million bucks to come to a Vegas party on a private plane and all the chips on the house. They also asked Scorsese, who turned them down,” the source said.

Lynch said more than $3 billion was scammed from 1MDB, but officials have so far been able to trace only $1 billion through American financial systems.

Reps for DiCaprio and Scorsese didn’t return requests for comment, but Red Granite issued a statement saying “none of the funding it received four years ago was in any way illegitimate and there is nothing in today’s civil lawsuit claiming that Red Granite knew otherwise.”

In addition to funding “The Wolf of Wall Street,” staggering amounts of stolen cash were spent on luxuries that the feds are seeking to have forfeited, including:

* A $5.5 million Vincent van Gogh drawing.
 * Two paintings by Claude Monet valued at $92.5 million.
* A $240 million stake in the Park Lane Hotel at 36 Central Park South.
* The $50.9 million penthouse at the Walker Tower in Chelsea.
* A $35 million Bombardier jet.
* The $44.8 million L’Ermitage hotel in Beverly Hills.
* A $30.5 million penthouse at the Time Warner Building at 80 Columbus Circle, which was bought sight unseen.

Starting in 2009, Low made headlines for spending millions in clubs with celebrities for whom he was footing the bill, including Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, Jamie Foxx and DiCaprio, who accompanied him on yachts, jets, casinos, nightclubs and ski trips all over the world.