Les Echos : Sauvetage d’Areva : vers un feu vert sous conditions de Bruxelles

Une décision de la Commission européenne sur le plan de sauvetage du groupe nucléaire public devrait intervenir dans l’après-midi. Selon nos informations, Areva devrait dans un premier temps faire appel à un prêt d’actionnaire de l’Etat.

Le cours de l'action d'Areva a été suspendu ce midi à la demande du groupe, dans la perspective de la publication d'un communiqué, a indiqué Euronext. Selon nos informations, la Commission européenne s'apprête à rendre une décision sur le plan de restructuration présenté par le groupe et son premier actionnaire, l'Etat. Selon deux sources, la Commission européenne autoriserait le plan de sauvetage sous conditions. Celles-ci, liées au rachat des actifs d'Areva NP (la branche Réacteurs) par EDF, obligeraient le groupe nucléaire public à solliciter dans un premier temps un prêt d'actionnaire auprès de l'Etat.

Dans ses plans initiaux, Areva prévoyait une augmentation de capital de 5 milliards d'euros dès le mois de février. Pour autoriser une aide d'Etat massive (4,5 milliards d'euros sur les 5 milliards de recapitalisation), les services de la commissaire européenne à la Concurrence souhaiteraient d'abord étudier le dossier de rachat des actifs d'Areva NP par EDF, selon ces sources. L'électricien public a déposé mi-novembre une offre ferme valorisant ces actifs 2,5 milliards d'euros. Mais cette offre est soumise à plusieurs conditions suspensives, notamment l'examen par l'Autorité de sûreté nucléaire de la conformité de la cuve de l'EPR en construction à Flamanville (Manche). Bruxelles souhaite également vérifier que cette acquisition par EDF soit bien conforme aux règles en matière de concentration et de concurrence.

Mi-décembre, Areva et son premier actionnaire l'Etat (à 86 %) avaient transmis aux services de la commissaire européenne à la Concurrence les derniers éléments du plan de sauvetage. Outre l'offre ferme d'EDF pour reprendre les actifs de la division Réacteurs, Areva avait présenté l'offre d'investisseurs -les japonais MHI et JNFL, pour 10 % du capital de NewCo soit 500 millions d'euros.

>>> Chipotle Mexican Grill follow up: Sees Q4 EPS well below consensus with impr

Chipotle Mexican Grill follow up: Sees Q4 EPS well below consensus with improvement in December sales as comps eased; adds $100 mln to buyback
Sees Q4 EPS $0.50-0.58 vs $0.98 Capital IQ Consensus; revs $1.035 bln vs $1.05 bln Capital IQ Consensus; comps -4.8% vs. ests near -3.5%.
  • Comparable restaurant sales for the quarter decreased 4.8%, which includes the benefit of 0.5% related to previously deferred revenue that was recognized in the fourth quarter. Comparable restaurant sales decreased 20.2% in October 2016, decreased 1.4% in November 2016, and increased 14.7% in December 2016. Sales comparisons are lapping an easier compare due to lower sales levels in November and December 2015.
  • Operating margin 13-14%. "During the quarter we incurred higher expenses compared to our originally-forecasted amounts in other operating costs, driven by increased promotional spend and costs related to testing television advertising. Our marketing and promotional expenses during the quarter totaled ~4.7% of sales. We also incurred higher food costs compared to our originally-forecasted amounts as a result of increased market costs for avocados."
  • This report is also filed to announce that Chipotle's Board of Directors has authorized repurchases of Chipotle common stock with a total aggregate purchase price of $100 million, exclusive of commissions. This repurchase is in addition to previously announced repurchase authorizations totaling $2.1 billion.

WSJ : Alibaba Is Better at Selling Than Buying

Alibaba Is Better at Selling Than Buying
At $2.6 billion, a 42% premium, a bigger stake in department-store operator Intime Retail is no bargain

Alibaba has gone shopping again—and picked up another nonbargain.

The New York-listed Chinese e-commerce titan said it will pay up to $2.6 billion to raise its stake in Hong Kong-listed Chinese department-store operator Intime Retail to around 74% from 28%.

Even for a company with a $230 billion market cap, that’s a lot to pay for a deal that probably won’t work. But it is in keeping with Alibaba’s scattershot approach. The company has spent nearly $30 billion on acquisitions since 2015, according to Dealogic, and while some deals have made strategic sense—like last year’s $1 billion investment in Lazada, an e-commerce company with a strong presence in Southeast Asia—many others serve no obvious purpose. Among the businesses it has jumped into: a soccer club, film studios and a Hong Kong newspaper.

Alibaba ended September with $3 billion in net cash, down from $12 billion in 2015, despite generating billions in cash every year from its core e-commerce business.

While looking to get in on the “next big thing” is natural for a technology company, it is hard to argue that a brick-and-mortar retailer qualifies. But Alibaba, having followed its initial 2014 Intime investment by paying a premium price of $4.5 billion for 20% of Chinese electronics chain Suning Commerce Group in 2015, is now looking to double down on Intime at a 42% premium. That’s an above-peer 23 times forward earnings for a company whose sales has been sliding.

Alibaba, still in the red on Suning, says it can integrate Intime’s online and offline customer data and improve inventory efficiency.

“Online to offline,” or O2O, has been a tech buzzword in China in the past few years, as its biggest tech companies spend billions on mobile services that let users to hail taxis, order food or buy movie tickets. But there’s a difference between operating a taxi-hauling app and running a department store or shopping mall.

And unlike Amazon, which sells directly to consumers, Alibaba acts merely as an online platform for merchants. Actually running a retail operation with inventories adds to the company’s risks.

This will be a pricey shopping trip for Alibaba.

Reuters - London banks' Brexit battle heads to Europe

London banks' Brexit battle heads to Europe


Banks with large London operations say they will step up lobbying European officials because they are running out of arguments to convince the British government the industry needs single market access after Britain leaves the European Union.

Banks have focussed on pressuring British officials to push for as much market access as possible since voters decided seven months ago to leave the EU. They held fewer meetings with European officials, according to several senior sources in the financial services industry.

The focus is shifting because after scores of meetings and research reports, banks, which say they may begin moving staff and operations out of London in the next few months if there is no clarity, feel they are running out of new points to make.

Prime Minister Theresa May said on Sunday she was not interested in Britain keeping "bits" of its EU membership, interpreted by some as signalling she will favour immigration controls over access to the single market.

Banks are now planning a new round of lobbying to highlight how a hard Brexit could harm the EU and the UK. They have identified French politicians, EU regulators and government officials, as key groups to win over.

"The battle for Britain is over, the battle for France is about to begin," said one senior lobbyist.

Another senior lobbyist for one of the major global banks said he will spend more time in Brussels this year to target the EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier and his teams as well as Didier Seeuws, a Belgian diplomat, who is helping coordinate the Brexit negotiations.

Another lobbyist said he is planning to visit Paris to meet with French politicians and regulators later this month.

Britain's position as Europe's financial centre is emerging as one of the main collision points in the Brexit talks. Some European politicians see an opportunity to challenge British dominance of finance after decades of viewing its free-wheeling "Anglo-Saxon" model of capitalism with suspicion.

EU leaders like French President Francois Hollande have said they plan to weaken Britain's grip on finance by, for instance, demanding the lucrative business of clearing euros should move to the euro zone.

Finance is Britain's most important industry, accounting for about a tenth of its economic output and is its biggest source of business tax revenue.

EUROPE'S INVESTMENT BANKER

But Britain also acts as "the investment banker for Europe", Bank of England Governor Mark Carney said in November, with more than half the equity and debt raised for European governments and companies done in the UK.

Banks will argue that Europe depends on the strength and the depth of the financial sector in London to service its economy and companies. If access to the EU is cut off, regional financial stability could be in jeopardy, they will say.

UK-based banks had total outstanding loans of more than 1.1 trillion pounds to European companies and governments at the start of 2016.

The British government has also privately appealed to financial organisations to make their case in Europe if they want a transitional period where their ability to operate in the EU would be phased out gradually over several years.

Finance minister Philip Hammond told a meeting of finance executives at the end of November they should lobby European governments if they want to secure a post-Brexit transitional deal, according to two people who were present.

Hammond made the comments at the annual dinner of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Wholesale Financial Markets and Services, attended by executives from the major British and international banks, according to the people who attended.

"He basically said we need a transitional deal to avoid a cliff edge effect, but the EU also needs to argue for it," one person at the dinner said. "He was implying that we need to help the government prepare the ground."

A Treasury spokesman, when asked for comment, reiterated Hammond's previous statements to lawmakers that Europe will harm itself if they use Brexit to undermine London's position as the region's principal financial centre.

Bankers say more work is needed on forging a consensus between Britain and Europe on what any transitional deal may look like. European officials say they will not discuss such a deal before Britain triggers Article 50 of the EU's Lisbon Treaty to start the process of leaving the EU.

"Everyone has a different definition of what it means in Europe and within Whitehall. We're trying to get a common view on what transition means," one of the lobbyists said.

The British government's relationship with business has gradually improved after months of friction after the vote.

It hit a low point during the Conservative party conference in October when May attacked a "rootless" international elite and officials privately suggested banks would get no special favours in the Brexit negotiations.

Nevertheless, banks feel they have largely finished putting forward their case for single market access.

"We feel we've been lobbying the UK government to death. We've presented every piece of evidence, every report, research, you name it," one of the lobbyists said.

"We've been repeating ourselves for a month or two now... What else do they really need from us now?"

One government official, who asked not to be named, said regular dialogue with the finance sector will continue, but the number of meetings may reduce.

"The door is open if people want to talk to us. There is not an arbitrary point at which speaking to people is no longer helpful," the person said. "But it has been intense, as we wanted it to be, and that intensity may ease."

Reuters - Italy arrests two for hacking into email accounts of ECB's Draghi, for

Italy arrests two for hacking into email accounts of ECB's Draghi, former Italy PM Renzi

Jan 10 Italian police arrested two people on Tuesday for hacking into thousands of email accounts, including those of European Central Bank President Mario Draghi and former prime minister Matteo Renzi.

"There were tens of thousands of email accounts hacked, and among them were accounts belonging to bankers, businessmen and even several cardinals in the Vatican," Roberto Di Legami, director of the specialised cyber police unit that conducted the investigation, told Reuters.

How the information may have been used is still under investigation, he said. It is still not clear exactly how much information was collected and how important it may have been, he said.

Police have sequestered a server in Rome containing thousands of files, but 99 percent of the data was stored in the United States, Di Legami said. The information will be shipped back in coming days but it will take some time before it can be analysed.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up: GNVC +61.8%, ILMN +13%, VRX +12%, CUDA +9.4%, ARRY +8.1%, SSI +5.7%, RIO +5.5%, CLF +5%, PSTI+4.8%, VALE +4.7%, BBL +4.7%, MT +4.1%, AKS +3.6%, BIO +3%, PTX +2.7%, CNDT +2.4%, XRX +2.2%, X +2.2%, MDRX+2%, TACO +1.7%, PTCT +1.2%, KITE +1%, VOXX +0.9%

Gapping down: HGG -23.7%, AKER -22.6%, WMB -8.8%, FRSH -7.1%, WPZ -6.4%, WDFC -5.8%, BOOT -5.4%, ATW -5.2%,CIO -4.3%, CRAY -4.2%, HALO -4.1%, DB -2.4%, SCVL -2.3%, ABMD -2.2%, ZLTQ -2.1%, DM -1.5%, FLDM -1%, ICLR -0.5%

Le Monde : Fibre : Orange « n’est pas responsable de l’impéritie de ses concurre

Fibre : Orange « n’est pas responsable de l’impéritie de ses concurrents »
Pierre Louette, directeur général délégué de l’opérateur de téléphonie, chargé de la régulation, répond aux critiques de Sébastien Soriano, le patron de l’Arcep.

L’Arcep vous reproche d’avoir une position trop dominante dans la fibre. Que lui répondez-vous ?
Ce reproche nous paraît très injuste et fondé sur une erreur d’analyse. Le régulateur communique de façon excessive. Il ne faut pas jouer avec des entreprises cotées en Bourse. Entre 2015 et 2018, nous aurons investi 4,5 milliards d’euros dans la fibre. Faut-il que l’on arrête ? Plutôt que d’évoquer notre supposé monopole, il faudrait plutôt parler des erreurs stratégiques et des errements de nos concurrents. Iliad s’est lancé dans la fibre en 2007 en même temps qu’Orange. Quand nous avons commencé à nous déployer dans les zones très denses, tout le monde pouvait le faire. SFR, qui a connu plusieurs actionnaires, a changé d’avis. Nous ne sommes pas responsables de l’impéritie de nos concurrents. Depuis, ceux qui le souhaitent, peuvent se rattraper. Iliad a cofinancé la construction de 5 millions de prises haut débit FTTH. Ceux qui ne l’ont pas fait sont évidemment très en retard.
Le régulateur propose aussi, comme le demande SFR, de revoir les accords de cofinancement dans les zones moins denses. Qu’en pensez-vous ?
Je rappelle que ces accords, qui prévoient qu’Orange déploie la fibre sur 80 % de ces zones, contre 20 % pour SFR, avaient à l’époque reçu la bénédiction de l’Autorité de la concurrence et du gouvernement auquel le président de l’Arcep appartenait. Je ne suis pas particulièrement favorable à la révision de ces accords. Tout à coup, SFR, qui était concentré sur son réseau câblé, trouve des vertus à fibre. Je ne suis pas comptable de ce changement de pied. Cela va être difficile d’aller dire à un tas de communes que, finalement, on ne va pas leur installer la fibre.
L’Arcep veut aussi réguler Orange sur le marché des entreprises…
L’Arcep n’est-elle pas trop volontariste par rapport au rythme des entreprises ? Nous sommes en pourparlers avec l’opérateur Kosc et très confiants dans notre capacité à signer prochainement un contrat avec eux. Il y aura ainsi, comme le souhaite le régulateur, un nouvel opérateur de gros sur le marché.
En zones rurales, des opérateurs vous reprochent de commercialiser uniquement les offres sur votre réseau…
Naturellement, nous sommes le primo-accédant à notre réseau. Mais il n’est pas fermé. Il est vrai que cela coûte de l’argent de commercialiser une offre de détail sur le réseau d’un autre opérateur. C’est un choix d’entreprise. Quant au fait de proposer des « offres activées » (prêtes à l’emploi) aux autres opérateurs, cela n’est pas imposé par l’Arcep. Cela demanderait d’ailleurs pas mal d’investissement complémentaire dont l’utilité est a priori très marginale.
L’Arcep reproche aux opérateurs d’être en retard dans le déploiement du très haut débit. Est-ce justifié ?
Il faudrait savoir : nous investissons trop ou pas assez ? C’est l’Europe en général qui a pris du retard. L’Espagne, en revanche, a de l’avance, grâce à une simplicité administrative et à des coûts peu élevés. En France, la loi Lemaire promulguée en 2016 propose des simplifications administrative. Nous avons été plus lents, et je remarque que celui qui nous le reproche aujourd’hui était conseiller du ministre [chargé du plan très haut débit – M. Soriano était directeur de cabinet de Fleur Pellerin, ministre déléguée du numérique de 2012 à 2014]. C’est bizarre de critiquer une politique à laquelle on a contribué