Fwd:FT : Swiss voters reject 50% inheritance tax for the super-rich



From: Laurent Chekroun (MAKOR CAPITAL MARKET) At: 11/30/25 18:57:33 UTC+1:00
Subject: FT : Swiss voters reject 50% inheritance tax for the super-rich
Swiss voters reject 50% inheritance tax for the super-rich
Overwhelming majority opposed wealth tax in contentious referendum

Swiss voters on Sunday overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to impose a 50 per cent inheritance levy on the super-rich, in a contentious referendum that came as governments around the world wrestle with how to tax the wealthy.

More than 80 per cent rejected the initiative, with about 42 per cent of the population participating by Sunday afternoon. Opponents of the measure had feared that a narrow defeat would invite other similar tax proposals in years to come.

The referendum, one of the most divisive in recent Swiss political memory, comes amid a global split between countries competing to lure wealthy families with fiscal incentives and those seeking to tax what they see as excessive fortunes.

The proposal from the far-left Young Socialists party would have introduced a federal inheritance and gift tax of 50 per cent on estates and transfers above SFr50mn (£47mn), marking a dramatic break from Switzerland’s tradition of decentralised, low-burden taxation. Revenue would have been earmarked for climate-related spending. 

The federal government opposed the initiative, warning it would damage Switzerland’s appeal as a stable home for internationally mobile wealth. The proposal was originally drafted to be retroactive — a clause that provoked a fierce backlash from business groups and tax lawyers and was later softened.

The move prompted deep anxiety among Swiss family offices and wealthy residents, some of whom were reviewing relocation options this year ahead of the vote, the Financial Times reported in June. Economists and lawyers warned the measure could affect succession planning for family-owned companies whose wealth is tied up in illiquid assets.

Frédéric Rochat, managing partner at Swiss private bank Lombard Odier, said the unequivocal result showed “Swiss common sense had prevailed”.

“Swiss people like to see their country’s policies remain stable [and] predictable,” he said. “They reject base populism that makes unnecessary noise.”

A “Yes” vote would have been a “significant change” to the Swiss tax landscape, said Philipp Zünd, tax expert at KPMG in Switzerland.

“Swiss voters have reinforced Switzerland’s reputation as a stable business hub,” he said.

The Swiss vote lands at a moment when governments’ approaches to wealthy individuals have diverged sharply.

In some financial centres the race to attract rich families is accelerating. Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong and Singapore are offering tax concessions and light-touch regulation to draw single-family offices — the private investment vehicles of the global super-rich. Hong Kong, which hosted an estimated 2,700 family offices in 2023, aims to attract 200 more by the end of 2025.

Elsewhere, countries are tightening rules or increasing levies. Italy has drawn a surge of arrivals under its flat-tax regime for foreign income, centred on Milan, but the government announced in October it plans to increase the levy by a further 50 per cent to €300,000 from next year.

In her first Budget last year, UK chancellor Rachel Reeves hit the super-rich by confirming the abolition of “non-dom” status, which allowed UK residents who declared their permanent home as being overseas to avoid paying UK tax on foreign income and gains.

Swiss lawyers said the referendum proposal had undermined Switzerland’s chances of attracting tax exiles from the UK following the non-dom change, with many opting for Italy rather than Switzerland.

Meanwhile, in late October the French parliament voted to reject a Socialist proposal for a tax of 2 per cent on wealth of more than €100mn. Another proposal for a 3 per cent tax on wealth over €10mn was also rejected.

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • Infineon (IFX TH) -1.2%
  • Siemens Energy (ENR TH) -1.2%
  • Airbus (AIR TH) -2.1%
    • Airbus Enters Last Weeks of the Year Facing a Cosmic Distraction
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -3.4%
    • US Says Ukraine Talks Productive as Witkoff Heads to Russia
MDAX:
  • Lanxess (LXS TH) -1.4%
  • Aurubis (NDA TH) -1.9%
  • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -2%
    • US Says Ukraine Talks Productive as Witkoff Heads to Russia
  • RENK Group (R3NK TH) -2.4%
    • US Says Ukraine Talks Productive as Witkoff Heads to Russia
  • Puma (PUM TH) -3.5%
SDAX:
  • Stratec (SBS TH) +4%
  • Hamborner REIT (HABA TH) +1.5%
  • Deutz (DEZ TH) -1.3%
  • ProSieben (PSM TH) -1.4%
  • PNE AG (PNE3 TH) -1.6%
  • Mutares (MUX TH) -1.8%
  • GFT (GFT TH) -1.8%

FT : Trading firm XTX donates £26mn for maths research at UK universities

Trading firm XTX donates £26mn for maths research at UK universities
Billionaire Alex Gerko says Britain is missing out on top academic talent

Billionaire Alex Gerko has criticised British governments for failing to fund maths research, as his trading firm XTX Markets donated £26mn to seven UK universities. 

“Despite successive governments’ pro-innovation rhetoric, years of underfunding in mathematics research have caused UK universities to miss out on too much of the world’s top talent,” Gerko said. 

XTX said on Monday it would donate £26.37mn to fund more than 100 PhD and postdoctoral pure maths research positions at universities across the UK. 

“This programme may help to fill the gap, but leaving strategically vital funding to philanthropy is a dereliction of duty,” Gerko added.

Gerko is one of the UK’s richest people and the country’s biggest individual taxpayer, according to Sunday Times estimates. The Russia-born entrepreneur gained a maths PhD in Moscow and later founded XTX in London in 2015, building it into one of the UK’s top private businesses. Gerko earned £682mn from XTX’s profits last year. 

The funding will be split between the universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Bristol, Edinburgh, Liverpool, Warwick and Imperial College London. The institutions will themselves choose which students to admit, with the money funding university places starting in 2026, 2027 and 2028.

British universities are facing a long-term funding squeeze. Fewer enrolments from international students due to more stringent immigration rules are also affecting university finances.

About 41 per cent of institutions will fail to balance their books next year despite an inflation-linked rise in tuition fees, according to recent government figures. 

XTX’s donation will vary depending on the university and the trading firm declined to disclose the split between institutions. The University of Cambridge said the donation would help it appoint about 10 PhD students and up to two postdoctoral researchers in each of the coming three years.

Gerko has long cared about maths education. He founded children’s charity Axiom Maths in 2022 and, alongside his wife Elena, is funding the creation of a specialist maths secondary school in Mill Hill, North London, which is set to open to pupils next year. 

The billionaire is often critical of UK politicians and has spoken out against funding cuts in maths education. XTX pointed to government figures showing that just 41 per cent of a promised £300mn in government funding for mathematical sciences was allocated before the programme was cancelled in 2022.

Simon Coyle, head of philanthropy at XTX, pointed to cuts in the numbers of the UK’s Centres for Doctoral Training, which are research centres for PhD candidates, saying that maths funding “is being decimated”.

“If you take the government’s goals and strategies at face value, they imply a significant need for more mathematicians and quantitative talent,” he said. He pointed to the government’s pushes on cyber security, defence and AI, adding that AI in particular “is basically maths . . . fundamentally that is maths talent”.

“It shouldn’t fall to philanthropy to be filling the gaps for what are nationally strategic, critical issues,” Coyle added.

FT : Black Forest Labs: one-year-old German start-up challenges AI giants

Black Forest Labs: one-year-old German start-up challenges AI giants
Low-profile group has quickly emerged as a top developer of image generation technology

German start-up Black Forest Labs has quietly raised more than $450mn since it was founded last year, as the low-profile group quickly emerged as one of the world’s top developers of artificial intelligence image generation.

The group, which was founded in the medieval town of Freiburg, has tripled its valuation in little more than a year to $3.25bn in its latest $300mn funding round. The cash will fuel its plan to take on Google and ByteDance in a market that promises to upend industries from advertising to Hollywood.

While other AI start-up leaders such as OpenAI’s Sam Altman have sought the limelight, Black Forest co-founder and chief executive Robin Rombach told the Financial Times he is keen to “let the product speak for itself”.

In just 15 months, the group has already struck a lucrative deal with Meta as well as partnerships with creative toolmakers Adobe and Canva. Rombach said it plans to use the new investment to boost its computing infrastructure and build out its commercial team.

Black Forest is one of the few European companies developing its own AI models, alongside Paris-based Mistral. Rombach said being headquartered outside the “super hype” of San Francisco — where AI firms are raiding each other’s talent with huge pay offers — is “the best thing that we have done so far”, as it helps the team stay “super focused”.

Its fundraising comes as demand for image-editing AI systems has exploded over the past year, driven by big advances in the technology.

Many AI researchers believe that Black Forest’s Flux models already rival Google’s Nano Banana and ByteDance’s Seedream image systems — despite both having larger computing resources, thousands of engineers and extensive video libraries from YouTube and TikTok to provide training data.

Investors say this is due to the expertise of Rombach and his Black Forest team, who previously developed a breakthrough technology for image generation known as Stable Diffusion.

“In the summer of 2022 when the internet blew up with hyper-realistic image generation, that was in no small part as a result of their work,” said Nathan Benaich, an early investor in Black Forest at Air Street Capital.

Rombach met the team that would later become his co-founders years earlier, while they were studying for their PhDs at LMU Munich and the University of Heidelberg. They put out a series of research papers focused on the AI technique of “latent diffusion”, which Rombach describes as “basically the foundation for a lot of the [generative AI] technology that is being built within this space”.

He notes that his university’s limited computing equipment forced him and his classmates to innovate. “We were running on super tiny GPUs on consumer grade hardware,” he said. “To get really good performance out of that, we had to come up with an algorithm that was more efficient.”

Early traction with the academic and research community spurred Rombach to scale up the technology for commercial use, joining London-based start-up Stability AI alongside fellow AI researchers from LMU and Heidelberg in 2022.

“Only a handful of people on the planet know how to advance the frontier of general [AI] models. Robin and team as the inventors of latent diffusion have that advantage,” said Anjney Midha, a venture partner at Andreessen Horowitz, whose new firm AMP jointly led Black Forest’s latest financing alongside Salesforce Ventures.

But after Stability AI ran into difficulties, Rombach and several of his colleagues left in 2024 to found Black Forest. It quickly raised funding from investors including Andreessen Horowitz and General Catalyst.

Jeannette zu Fürstenberg, who leads General Catalyst’s European business, said that staying in Freiburg helped the start-up keep “grounded”. “It’s a very distinct group of people,” she said. “The best companies become an almost cult-like tight-knit group.”

What started as a team of around 10 people has now grown to 50 full-time staff, mainly in Freiburg with a growing presence in San Francisco.

Rombach said that releasing some versions of its Flux model under an “open source” licence, meaning they can be used and modified freely for certain applications, has been vital for winning over developers and giving customers more control over their data and intellectual property. The cost for developers to access Flux is also significantly cheaper than Google’s Nano Banana.

Improvements to the latest Flux model include preserving individuals’ likenesses as the AI technology places them in realistic or imagined situations, as well as combining several different images to create a new one.

One person who has worked with members of Black Forest’s team warned that while the start-up’s small size gave it a key advantage in speed, it may lack a long-term technical edge.

“The people running this lab have made, quite objectively, very big contributions to the field,” the person said. “Other than that, in generative AI, it’s hard to survive as a small lab.”

One early investor, Michael Ovitz, co-founder of Creative Artists Agency, has helped Rombach and his team make connections in Hollywood, even though many studios are still wary of AI tools following the 2023 writers’ strike.

“We treat IP as a pretty serious matter,” Rombach said. “Our goal is to work with creators and creatives to augment them and help them create something novel, not replace something that exists.”

FT : Billionaire Benettons strike private capital merger in expansion push

Billionaire Benettons strike private capital merger in expansion push
Family holding company has agreed to merge its asset management arm 21 Invest with Milan-based Tages

Italy’s billionaire Benetton family is combining its private capital business with a rival, as it embarks on an ambitious plan to triple its assets under management to €10bn in the next five years.

Edizione, the family’s holding company, has agreed to merge its asset management arm 21 Invest with Milan-based Tages to create 21 Next, which will be controlled by Edizione and will manage a combined €3bn in assets. 

Alessandro Benetton, 61, scion of the family which owes its fortune to the United Colors of Benetton fashion brand, will chair the group. Tages co-founder Panfilo Tarantelli, 70, will serve as chief executive.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Benetton said he sees asset management becoming a much larger part of Edizione’s holdings and that 21 Next will seek to expand both organically and through further consolidation of private capital firms.

“We are launching this project at a very favourable moment because there is a transition happening in the [private capital] industry,” Benetton said, arguing that the days of buyout firms simply adding leverage and selling companies to generate large returns were over.

“Now it’s much harder than before, it’s a technological issue with what is going on with the impact of AI as well as a talent issue.” Edizione is better suited to making operational improvements to deliver better returns at portfolio companies given its history, he added.

As part of the deal, Edizione will provide an initial €500mn of seed capital to the newly formed firm.

FT : Stellantis car production in France set for 11% drop by 2028

Stellantis car production in France set for 11% drop by 2028
Unions expect owner of Peugeot and Fiat brands to manufacture fewer vehicles at all its factories

Production at Stellantis’ French factories is set to drop over the next three years, as the maker of Peugeot, Fiat and Jeep vehicles suffers a sharper manufacturing slowdown than European rivals.

The number of units being produced at the company’s five assembly factories in France is predicted to fall by 11 per cent between 2025 and 2028, according to trade union estimates based on presentations by Stellantis last week.

Production reached more than 661,000 vehicles in 2025, a recovery from the low of 565,000 in 2024 when high inventories and a slowdown in demand affected the company.

But Stellantis expects that production will fall at all five assembly factories over the next three years, meaning sales would dip to less than 590,000 in 2028, according to the union figures seen by the Financial Times.

Stellantis has been hit harder than many other carmakers by a slowdown in demand in Europe.

A report by McKinsey for automotive suppliers representative group Clepa on Thursday estimated production of light vehicles in Europe would fall 6 per cent to 8.9mn between 2024 and 2028.

According to the report, European car production in 2024 was more than 30 per cent below levels in 2017, and in that time Stellantis had the steepest drop in growth of any major automobile manufacturer on the continent.

Stellantis chief executive Antonio Filosa told the FT in November: “[The overall European market] lost 3mn cars from pre-Covid to now. This is the equivalent of the capacity of 10 automaker plants. We cannot afford to lose another 3mn cars.”

Stellantis’ French output is set to be lowest at its Poissy plant in the Île-de-France region, which includes Paris. The site has been used as a car factory for various brands since 1937.

It employs 2,000 people but currently produces two models approaching the end of their lifecycle in 2028, by which point vehicle manufacturing is set to fall to 55,000, against more than 90,000 in 2025.

Stellantis last week announced an investment of €20mn in metal work and recycling at the plant, which would amount to 200 jobs.

A decision on whether to continue car production after 2028 will be taken in the first half of 2026, but “the factory will not close”, Stellantis said.

The commitment was welcomed by unions but workers’ representatives noted that jobs were at risk because no new vehicles were allocated to be produced at the site.

“It’s not a panacea. There’s no new project to make cars,” said Laurent Oechsel, representative of the CFE-CGC union, who added that unions were waiting for more details of Filosa’s strategy in the new year.

Fabrice Jamart, representative of the more hardline CGT union, added: “For me, it’s playing to the gallery, to say ‘We are doing something, we’re taking care of you, don’t worry.’ Then when the axe falls, it will be too late.”

Filosa will outline his strategy to turn Stellantis around in the new year, having taken over as chief executive in June.

He is among car bosses lobbying the European Commission to relax its planned ban on new sales of combustion engine cars in 2035.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has urged the European Commission to scrap the proposed ban and allow the production of hybrid vehicles beyond the deadline.

Stellantis declined to comment on its production forecasts but Filosa said of the move by Merz: “We now have a great opportunity to rethink the rules and reconcile Europe’s three key objectives: decarbonisation, industrial resilience that protects jobs and strategic autonomy, and affordability.”

FT : Will Volkswagen’s radical revamp be enough?

Will Volkswagen’s radical revamp be enough?
A year after revealing plans for capacity cuts and job losses in Germany, some think more retrenchment is needed

Saying goodbye to Volkswagen was a hard decision for Martin Maatz. Accepting the car maker’s voluntary redundancy offer after 15 years at the company’s Dresden factory involved a lot of “hand wringing”, the 40-year-old tells the FT.

Getting a job at Volkswagen had been a “dream” for him. The German auto giant “was simply the brand with the biggest draw,” he recalls, before adding that its image has “suffered a lot in recent years”.

Maatz, who works on the assembly line and acts as a shop steward, is one of 35,000 German workers whose jobs will disappear by the end of the decade, under a sweeping cost-cutting plan.

That deal, struck with the country’s powerful labour unions last year, was a milestone. It will lead to more than one in four domestic roles at the VW brand being axed and — for the first time in its 88-year history — the end of car production at one of its sites in Germany.

Volkswagen is struggling to adjust to the rise of electric vehicles, big sales declines in China and lacklustre demand in Europe. Its chief executive, Oliver Blume, warned at the time that the core VW brand faced an unprecedentedly “serious situation”.

“The general conditions haven’t improved. In fact, they’ve gotten worse”, says Stefan Bratzel, director of the Center of Automotive Management in Germany. The crisis has spilled over to the carmaker’s premium marques, Porsche and Audi, which historically have driven high growth and rich profits. US President Donald Trump has imposed tariffs on imported cars.

These will cost Volkswagen up to €5bn this year alone, putting it among the hardest hit carmakers in the world. “US tariffs, in particular, are having a lasting negative impact on our results,” chief financial officer Arno Antlitz tells the FT.


Auto industry experts are now asking whether last year’s landmark cost-cutting plan will be enough. “Another multibillion-euro funding gap has emerged,” says Helena Wisbert, professor for automotive economics at the Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences in Wolfsburg, the Lower Saxony city long dominated by the auto giant.

She questions whether the fragile compromise between Volkswagen and its powerful labour unions will hold until 2030, and says the carmaker could be forced to sell off business units or make more drastic cuts.

“I’m curious to see what Volkswagen comes up with, because this major cost-saving programme has already examined all possible cost reduction options.”

Analysts polled by Reuters forecast that the group’s net profit will more than half to €5.2bn this year compared to last. Porsche, the maker of the iconic 911 rear-engined sports car, fell into a loss in the third quarter after writing off €1.8bn because of delays to new electric vehicle models.

Even if a forecast rebound materialises as expected, Volkswagen’s group profit in 2027 will still be 16 per cent below its post-pandemic peak in 2023.

Its shares have dropped 60 per cent from the highs of 2021, wiping out €94bn in market capitalisation and making it one of the worst performing German blue-chips.

The group has responded by vowing to improve profits by €6bn by the end of the decade, with €2bn of the uplift coming from a long-term wage deal with unions that limits pay rises and trims perks, as well as another 15,000 job cuts at other business units.

“We must accelerate the implementation of the existing programmes and increase our efforts on the cost side — without making any concessions on the products,” Antlitz says.

Rival German carmakers BMW and Mercedes-Benz have also been hit hard by the downturn in China sales and the imposition of tariffs. But Volkswagen, the global symbol of German carmaking prowess, is more reliant on lower-margin mass market cars and employs a disproportionately large number of staff in Germany — two-fifths work there, even though only 19 per cent of its vehicles are manufactured domestically. Production costs in the country are among “the highest worldwide”, says Wisbert.

In China, Volkswagen has sought to shore up its position by localising development and says it can halve production costs for a new battery car compared with Germany, thanks to lower labour costs, quicker development times and stronger supply chains for key components.

For many, the surprise is that the company’s dramatic retrenchment has taken so long. Maatz, who will undertake a training course before looking for another job in the auto sector, says “it’s been a long time since anyone expected another outcome”.

The glass-walled “transparent factory” in Dresden where Maatz worked was conceived as a showcase for both German reunification and Volkswagen’s engineering prowess.

It was a pet project of Ferdinand Piëch, who spent more than two decades as chief executive and then chair and died in 2019. He was the grandson of Ferdinand Porsche, who had designed the cheap and dependable “people’s car” that handed Germany’s 1930s Nazi government a propaganda coup and gave Volkswagen its name.


But it was the domineering and autocratic Piëch, who took over at Volkswagen in 1993 during a profitability crisis, who transformed the group into a sprawling portfolio of automotive and truck brands and built up its commanding position in the Chinese market.

Piëch slashed procurement costs by squeezing suppliers and widened the group’s global footprint by acquiring luxury brands such as Bentley and Lamborghini and truckmakers MAN and Scania.

He and his protégé Martin Winterkorn, who became chief executive in 2007, pursued a grandiose vision of becoming the world’s biggest mobility group. In 2012, the enlarged group reported €25.5bn in pre-tax profit, the highest ever for a listed German company, and would later dethrone Toyota as the world’s biggest carmaker by volume.

During this era, sales growth and profitability was driven by high-margin premium brands such as Audi and Porsche — and its spectacular success in China. Volkswagen was a pioneer there, setting up the Shanghai Volkswagen Automotive Company, or SAIC, as early as 1984.

In the years leading up to the Covid-19 pandemic, Volkswagen cashed in close to €5bn of profit annually from its joint ventures. China became the single biggest market for Porsche and Audi, with the country’s nouveaux riches snapping up gas-guzzling luxury sedans and SUVs.

Piëch’s obsession with engineering expertise, detail and quality played well in premium models, such as the 570-horsepower Porsche Cayenne that famously towed a 285-tonne Airbus A380 across Paris airport in 2017.


But his managerial priorities did not wring the same benefits from the group’s main volume marque. Profitability at the Volkswagen brand was underwhelming even in better times for the wider group. Its operating margin averaged 3.2 per cent across the five years before the coronavirus pandemic, just half of management’s current target and far behind that of Škoda, another of the group’s volume brands whose manufacturing base is largely outside Germany.

The transparent factory came to symbolise such shortcomings. It was originally built to produce the flagship Phaeton, a luxury sedan named for a mythological Greek god with some variants costing €90,000 or more. But the car, widely derided as boring and overpriced, was a commercial flop and production finally ceased in 2016.

By that time Volkswagen was embroiled in a much deeper crisis. Early in 2015, Piëch and Winterkorn had a spectacular falling out, with Piëch quitting as chair of the group’s supervisory board as a result. Winterkorn resigned later that year, after US authorities discovered that the group had installed software to detect when diesel-engined cars were being tested for emissions and alter engine performance to ensure they complied.

“Dieselgate” erupted into one of the biggest frauds in German corporate history and dragged Volkswagen into a maelstrom of litigation around the world that has so far resulted in over €30bn worth of fines and settlements.

Former Audi boss Rupert Stadler pleaded guilty to fraud in 2023 and was handed a suspended jail sentence and fined €1.1mn. Proceedings against Winterkorn were suspended this year due to the former chief executive’s poor health.

The long years of success, particularly in China, “masked many structural problems in Wolfsburg”, says Bratzel. Governance experts and investors link Volkswagen’s many blunders to its byzantine corporate structure.

It has two classes of shares. The Porsche-Piëch family controls 53 per cent of the voting rights through its holding of ordinary shares. The Qatar Investment Authority owns a further 17 per cent. But most other institutional shareholders are reduced to owning so-called preference shares, which are far more liquid but do not carry votes.

VW is not “transparent” with its shareholders and its supervisory board is not truly independent, according to Ingo Speich, head of corporate governance at VW shareholder Deka Investment. He is also unhappy that such a large and complex conglomerate has, for the past three years, been run by a part-time chief executive, since Blume also runs Porsche — a role he will pass on only at the end of this year.

VW said it met all corporate governance requirements and that the supervisory board acted “in shareholders’ best interests”.

The state government of Lower Saxony, which Bratzel describes as economically “dependent” on Volkswagen, holds another 20 per cent of the voting rights. It also has a special veto on key decisions and can name two supervisory board members that do not require approval from other shareholders.

Another 10 seats on the 20-member supervisory board are held by workers representatives, as is normal at larger German companies. That means the two entities which share a desire to preserve jobs are able to outvote the representatives of the Porsche-Piëch family and the QIA.

Despite their control of the voting rights, “the owners cannot do what they want,” says Bank of America auto analyst Horst Schneider, adding that Volkswagen’s current cost-cutting plan might not be “sufficiently ambitious” and that its eventual scope would “depend on what management could do with the unions”.

After the Phaeton was abandoned, the Dresden factory was converted into a laboratory for VW’s electrification efforts, producing an electric version of the Golf hatchback and more recently the battery-powered ID.3.

But with an annual output of just 6,000 vehicles, the plant accounts for a tiny fraction of the group’s global output. Doubling up as a showroom, it is visited by tens of thousands of tourists a year who watch the live production through its massive glass walls.


After all production stops in mid-December, the site is set to become an “innovation campus” for Dresden’s Technical University, although VW plans to maintain a presence. Heiko Rabe, who joined Volkswagen almost 25 years ago and now works in the visitor centre, plans to stay on. But the looming end of carmaking was “sobering” for 300 or so remaining employees at the factory, he says.

A similar fate awaits for the much larger Osnabrück plant, which employs 2,300 staff and produced 35,000 vehicles last year. In mid-2027, the production of the final model made there — the T-Roc convertible — will end, and Volkswagen has not named a new model for the site.

Instead it is searching for a buyer, with defence group Rheinmetall initially expressing an interest but later pulling back. “Unless some kind of miracle happens, it will be extremely difficult [to save Volkswagen car production in Osnabrück],” says Jürgen Placke, the head of the local works council.

He insists that the site’s issues are not caused by German wage levels but poor managerial decisions. The Osnabrück factory has long specialised in low-volume niche models, and was the birthplace of the famous Karmann Ghia sports car in the 1950s. But demand for convertibles has been declining around the world.

When running at full capacity, the plant was not only profitable but — according to Volkswagen’s own internal benchmarking — “a top performer”, union representatives stress. They blame management’s flawed model strategy and the lack of EV models that appealed to consumers for the crisis.

The situation has become so dire that even Volkswagen’s headquarters in Wolfsburg — which has for decades been the largest car factory in Europe, cranking out more than half a million cars — will be stripped of two of its four production lines. Overall, the VW brand is slashing production capacity in Germany by 40 per cent, shutting production lines for 734,000 vehicles.

A year since agreeing the cuts, the company says it has made some palpable progress. It identified 70 per cent of the German workers who will leave by 2030. Factory costs at three of its largest sites — Wolfsburg, Emden and Zwickau — have been cut by 30 per cent on average already, it adds.

There are other positive signs, too. Drivers in Europe have started to warm to Volkswagen’s new electric vehicles, even as a wave of cheap imported Chinese cars threatens to undercut them. One in every four battery-powered vehicles sold in Europe so far this year has been produced by the German group.

In its home country, the VW brand’s electric car sales have risen by almost three-quarters so far this year, partly at the expense of Tesla, whose sales have halved. Some of its models, including the mid-sized ID.7 sedan, are regarded as being among the best battery-powered vehicles.

“We are currently very successful in the electric segment. That was not always the case,” says Alexander Sauer-Wagner, head of the German Volkswagen and Audi dealership association. He hopes that smaller and cheaper electric models, planned for launch over the coming two years, will bring a “big boost” to sales. He stresses that a strong offering in the entry segment was a must. “That’s ultimately what makes Volkswagen strong.”

Optimists point to Volkswagen’s overall heft as it owns some of the industry’s most coveted and emotional global brands, boasts deep engineering expertise and, despite the financial impact of dieselgate, still has a robust balance sheet; its automotive division had €31bn of net cash and short-term deposits at the end of September.

For the VW brand, “things are already looking up”, says Wisbert. “It has already reached the bottom.”

The information : Databricks Boosts Sales Forecast, Driving Valuation to $134 Bi

Databricks Boosts Sales Forecast, Driving Valuation to $134 Billion

The Takeaway
  • Databricks seeks $5 billion at $134 billion valuation, 32 times sales
  • Databricks projects 55% sales growth, but gross margin has fallen to 74%
  • CEO Ali Ghodsi has warned of an AI bubble despite Databricks’ growth from AI

Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi has been more vocal than other Silicon Valley executives about the dangers of an AI bubble. His company’s new $5 billion round of fundraising, at a higher valuation than ever, epitomizes the risks and rewards of the boom: While sales are growing faster than forecast, AI development costs are squeezing gross profit margins.

Privately held Databricks began asking investors for cash two weeks ago in a fundraising round that values the company at $134 billion, which is roughly 32 times this year’s expected sales of about $4.1 billion, according to investor documents and a person familiar with the matter. Last year, Databricks raised cash at 24 times that year’s sales, and the year before, at 26 times.

Investors appear to be willing to give Databricks a higher multiple because it has been able to continue a streak of several years with a more than 50% growth rate, an unusually fast pace among mature software firms.

In fact, the company has increased its sales projections at least twice this year, according to the documents and the person. In September, it revised its sales projection from $3.8 billion to $4 billion, before revising it upward again slightly. It now expects sales to grow by 55% this year.

At the same time, the company has told investors its gross margin is falling faster than anticipated, to 74% compared to an earlier plan for 77%, due to increasing usage of its AI products.

Overall, Databricks is operating at roughly breakeven, anticipating about $10 million in free cash flow this year. That’s a big improvement from when the company was burning hundreds of millions in cash a year, as recently as 2023. But it’s far less profitable, by the measure of free cash flow margin, than similarly sized public companies like Palantir and Snowflake.

Databricks’ valuation puts it in the middle of the pack relative to some of its rivals. Snowflake and Datadog are valued at 21 times and 16 times expected sales, respectively. Palantir, a favorite stock among retail traders, is the only publicly traded software firm with a richer valuation, more than 90 times this year’s expected sales.

Databricks sells a data lake, a type of database for storing different types of corporate data. Recently, it has been trying to win more business by convincing customers they can use its AI agents to automate human resources and IT service management tasks, replacing more traditional software. Databricks has said it derives about a quarter of its revenue from AI products.

The company has close ties with OpenAI, one of its biggest customers. In September, Databricks said it would spend $100 million on OpenAI models over several years. It’s previously told investors its top 10 customers collectively make up less than 15% of its usage.

Bubble Warning

While touting how his own company has benefited from AI sales, CEO Ali Ghodsi, a co-founder, has warned investors that other AI executives have become overexuberant about the near-term capabilities of AI. In an interview with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon in September, Ghodsi said, “It’s early days. That’s why we’re in a bubble, right?”

He added that Databricks was benefiting from customers moving quickly to try to automate more business tasks. “The only thing I don’t know is if there is a big correction, that could set us back,” he added.

What concerns some investors more immediately is rising costs. Databricks’ gross margin fell to about 74% in the third quarter from 79% in the same period last year. The decline was due to increasing expenses tied to running a new cloud storage offering for customers and buying graphics processing units to run small AI models, the company told investors recently.

Publicly traded software firms with similar data infrastructure businesses, such as Snowflake, have also reported declining gross margins in recent quarters.

Ghodsi has been happy to raise money privately while pushing off an initial public offering that would be one of the most highly anticipated listings in tech in years. Databricks is the fifth most valuable private tech company in the U.S., after OpenAI, SpaceX, Anthropic and xAI. Its $10 billion funding round last December was among the largest ever by a private company.

Insight Partners, a tech investment firm that buys shares in public and private companies, is an existing investor in Databricks and is expected to lead the new round and invest at least $500 million. The company would use the capital from the new funding round to buy back shares from employees while covering taxes related to the share sales.